Backup of NATURE FAUNE VOL 23 ISSUE 2
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Collaborative Management Models in Africa
Collaborative Management Models in Africa Peter Lindsey Mujon Baghai Introduction to the context behind the development of and rationale for CMPs in Africa Africa’s PAs represent potentially priceless assets due to the environmental services they provide and for their potential economic value via tourism However, the resources allocated for management of PAs are far below what is needed in most countries to unlock their potential A study in progress indicates that of 22 countries assessed, half have average PA management budgets of <10% of what is needed for effective management (Lindsey et al. in prep) This means that many countries will lose their wildlife assets before ever really being able to benefit from them So why is there such under-investment? Two big reasons - a) competing needs and overall budget shortages; b) a high burden of PAs relative to wealth However, in some cases underinvestment may be due to: ● Misconceptions that PAs can pay for themselves on a park level ● Lack of appreciation among policy makers that PAs need investment to yield economic dividends This mistake has grave consequences… This means that in most countries, PA networks are not close to delivering their potential: • Economic value • Social value • Ecological value Africa’s PAs are under growing pressure from an array of threats Ed Sayer ProtectedInsights areas fromare becoming recent rapidly research depleted in many areas There is a case for elevated support for Africa’s PA network from African governments But also a case for greater investment from -
Ghana Forest and Wildlife Policy
REPUBLIC OF GHANA GHANA FOREST AND WI LDLIFE POLICY Ministry of Lands and Natural Resources Accra- Ghana 2012 Ghana Forest and Wildlife Policy © Ministry of Land and Natural Resources 2012 For more information, call the following numbers 0302 687302 I 0302 66680 l 0302 687346 I 0302 665949 Fax: 0302 66680 t -ii- Ghana Forest and Wildlife Policy CONTENTS ABBREVIATIONS AND ACRONYMS ... ... .. .............. .. ..... ....... ............ .. .. ...... .. ........ .. vii ACKNOWLEDGEMENT ................................................................. .......................... viii FOREWORD ........................................................................................... ...................... ix 1.0 PREAMBLE ............ .. .................................................................. .............................. ! 2.0 Overview Of Forest And Wildlife Sector ..... ............................ .................... ... 3 2 .1 Forest and Wildlife Conservation 3 2.1.1 Forest Plantation Development 4 2.1.2 Collaborative Forest Management 5 2.2 Challenges and Issues in the Forest and Wildlife Sector 2.3 National Development Agenda and Forest and Wildlife Management 2.4 International Concerns on the Global Environment 9 3.0 THE POLICY FRAMEWORK ......................... .. ............................................ ........ 10 3.1 Guiding Principles 10 4 .0 THE FOREST AND WILDLIFE POLICY STATEMENT ............................ ......... 12 4 .1 Aim of the Policy 12 4.2 Objectives of the Policy 12 5.0 Policy Strategies ............ -
Linking FLEGT and REDD+ to Improve Forest Governance
ETF r n i s s u e N o . 5 5 , m a R c h 2 0 1 4 n E w s 55 RodeRick Zagt Linking FLEGT and REDD+ to Improve Forest Governance EuropEan Tropical ForEsT ResEarch Network EuRopEan TRopIcaL ForesT REsEaRch NetwoRk ETFRN News Linking FLEGT and REDD+ to Improve Forest Governance IssuE no. 55, maRch 2014 This publication has been produced with the financial assistance of the European commission’s Thematic programme for Environment and sustainable management of natural Resources, Including Energy; the European Forest Institute’s Eu REDD Facility; the German Federal ministry for Economic cooperation and Development (BmZ); and the Government of the netherlands. The views expressed herein are the sole responsibility of the authors and can in no way be taken to reflect the views of ETFRn, Tropenbos International, the European union or the other participating organizations. published by: Tropenbos International, wageningen, the netherlands copyright: © 2014 ETFRn and Tropenbos International, wageningen, the netherlands Texts may be reproduced for non-commercial purposes, citing the source. citation: Broekhoven, Guido and marieke wit (eds.). (2014). Linking FLEGT and REDD+ to Improve Forest Governance. Tropenbos International, wageningen, the netherlands. xx + 212 pp. Editors: Guido Broekhoven and marieke wit Final editing and layout: Patricia halladay Graphic Design IsBn: 978-90-5113-116-1 Issn: 1876-5866 cover photo: women crossing a bridge near kisangani, DRc. Roderick Zagt printed by: Digigrafi, Veenendaal, the netherlands available from: ETFRn c/o Tropenbos International p.o. Box 232, 6700 aE wageningen, the netherlands tel. +31 317 702020 e-mail [email protected] web www.etfrn.org This publication is printed on Fsc®-certified paper. -
African Parks 2 African Parks
African Parks 2 African Parks African Parks is a non-profit conservation organisation that takes on the total responsibility for the rehabilitation and long-term management of national parks in partnership with governments and local communities. By adopting a business approach to conservation, supported by donor funding, we aim to rehabilitate each park making them ecologically, socially and financially sustainable in the long-term. Founded in 2000, African Parks currently has 15 parks under management in nine countries – Benin, Central African Republic, Chad, the Democratic Republic of Congo, the Republic of Congo, Malawi, Mozambique, Rwanda and Zambia. More than 10.5 million hectares are under our protection. We also maintain a strong focus on economic development and poverty alleviation in neighbouring communities, ensuring that they benefit from the park’s existence. Our goal is to manage 20 parks by 2020, and because of the geographic spread and representation of different ecosystems, this will be the largest and the most ecologically diverse portfolio of parks under management by any one organisation across Africa. Black lechwe in Bangweulu Wetlands in Zambia © Lorenz Fischer The Challenge The world’s wild and functioning ecosystems are fundamental to the survival of both people and wildlife. We are in the midst of a global conservation crisis resulting in the catastrophic loss of wildlife and wild places. Protected areas are facing a critical period where the number of well-managed parks is fast declining, and many are simply ‘paper parks’ – they exist on maps but in reality have disappeared. The driving forces of this conservation crisis is the human demand for: 1. -
Human-Wildlife Conflicts
Nature & Faune Vol. 21, Issue 2 Human-Wildlife Conflicts Editor: M. Laverdière Assistant Editors: L. Bakker, A. Ndeso-Atanga FAO Regional Office for Africa [email protected] www.fao.org/world/regional/raf/workprog/forestry/magazine_en.htm FOOD AND AGRICULTURE ORGANISATION OF THE UNITED NATIONS Accra, Ghana 2007 The designations employed and the presentation of material in this information product do not imply the expression of any opinion whatsoever on the part of the Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations concerning the legal or development status of any country, territory, city or area or of its authorities, or concerning the delimitation of its frontiers or boundaries. The views expressed in this publication are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of the Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. All rights reserved. Reproduction and dissemination of material in this information product for educational or other non-commercial purposes are authorized without any prior written permission from the copyright holders provided the source is fully acknowledged. Reproduction of material in this information product for resale or other commercial purposes is prohibited without written permission of the copyright holders. Applications for such permission should be addressed to the Chief, Electronic Publishing Policy and Support Branch, Communication Division, FAO,Viale delle Terme di Caracalla, 00153 Rome, Italy or by e-mail to [email protected]. ©FAO 2007 Nature & Faune Vol. 21, Issue 2 Table of Contents Page Editorial 1 News News in Africa 2 News Worldwide 3 FAO News 5 Thematic News in Africa 6 Thematic News Worldwide 6 Special Feature Human-Wildlife Conflict: A Case for Collaboration 8 Madden, F. -
Forest Conservation for Communities and Carbon: the Economics of Community Forest Management in The
Forest conservation for communities and carbon: the economics of community forest management in the Bale Mountains Eco-Region, Ethiopia Charlene Watson May 2013 Thesis submitted in fulfilment of the degree of Doctor of Philosophy London School of Economics and Political Science 1 Declaration of work This thesis is the result of my own work except where specifically indicated in the text and acknowledgements. The copyright of this thesis rests with the author. Quotation from it is permitted, provided that full acknowledgement is made. This thesis may not be reproduced without my prior written consent. Photos are the authors own, as are the figures generated. I warrant that this authorisation does not, to the best of my belief, infringe the rights of any third party. May 2013 2 Abstract Forest conservation based on payments anchored to opportunity costs (OCs) is receiving increasing attention, including for international financial transfers for reduced emissions from deforestation and degradation (REDD+). REDD+ emerged as a payment for environmental service (PES) approach in which conditional payments are made for demonstrable greenhouse gas emission reductions against a business-as-usual baseline. Quantitative assessments of the OCs incurred by forest users of these reductions are lacking. Existing studies are coarse, obscure the heterogeneity of OCs and do not consider how OCs may change over time. An integrated assessment of OCs and carbon benefits under a proposed community forest management (CFM) intervention linked to REDD+ is undertaken in Ethiopia. The OCs of land for the intervention are estimated through household survey and market valuation. Scenarios explore how OCs are likely to change over the intervention given qualitative conservation goals and available land-use change information. -
7. Willingness to Pay for Systematic Management of Community Forests for Conservation of Non-Timber Forest
CHAPTER 7 WILLINGNESS TO PAY FOR SYSTEMATIC MANAGEMENT OF COMMUNITY FORESTS FOR CONSERVATION OF NON-TIMBER FOREST PRODUCTS IN NIGERIA’S RAINFOREST REGION Implications for poverty alleviation NNAEMEKA A. CHUKWUONE# AND CHUKWUEMEKA E. OKORJI## # Centre for Entrepreneurship and Development Research and Department of Agricultural Economics, University of Nigeria Nsukka ## Department of Agricultural Economics, University of Nigeria Nsukka E-mail: [email protected] Abstract. Despite the importance of non-timber forest products (NTFP) in sustaining livelihood and poverty smoothening in rural communities, they are highly depleted and poorly conserved. Besides, conservation initiatives in Nigeria to date are rarely participatory. Even community forests, the main source of NTFP, are poorly conserved. Therefore, to enhance participatory conservation initiatives, this study determines the willingness of households in forest communities in the rainforest region of Nigeria to pay for systematic management of community forests using the contingent-valuation method. A multistage random-sampling technique was used in selecting 180 respondent households used for the study. The value-elicitation format used was discrete choice with open-ended follow-up questions. A Tobit model with sample selection was used in estimating the bid function. The findings show that some variables such as wealth category, occupation, number of years of schooling and number of females in a household positively and significantly influence willingness to pay. Gender (male-headed households), start price of the valuation, number of males in a household and distance from home to forests negatively and significantly influence willingness to pay. Incorporating these findings in initiatives to organize the local community in systematic management of community forests for NTFP conservation will enhance participation and hence poverty alleviation. -
Bangweulu Hunting Memo Who: This Brief Document Is for the Public
Bangweulu Hunting Memo Who: This brief document is for the public (to be placed on our website), key donors and partners who have a stake or vested interested in sustainable use of wildlife resources. Background Bangweulu Wetlands is a vast wetland ecosystem that is situated in north-eastern Zambia, covering an area of 6,000 km2. Bangweulu is unique in that it is a Game Management Area (GMA) and a community- owned protected wetland, home to 50,000 people who retain the right to sustainably harvest its natural resources and who depend on the natural resources the park provides. These wetlands and the adjoining lake Bangweulu are biologically significant. The area has been declared a RAMSAR site and contains diverse flora and fauna, including more than 433 bird species. The GMA encompasses most of the distribution of the endemic black lechwe antelope, as well as several other iconic species unique to the area, including the shoebill stork, and remnant elephant and buffalo populations. This landscape has been managed by the Bangweulu Wetlands Management Board (BWMB) since 2008. The Board is a partnership between conservation organisation African Parks, the Zambia Department of National Parks and Wildlife (DNPW), as well as six Community Resource Boards associated with each Chiefdom. The mission of BWMB is to restore the functioning of the Bangweulu ecosystem, a critical wetland habitat of rich biodiversity that provides socio-economic benefits to the local communities. Prior to the partnership with African Parks, rampant poaching and unrestricted fishing had depleted the area’s natural resources, including the black lechwe population. -
Forest Investment Program Ghana
FOREST INVESTMENT PROGRAM GHANA: PUBLIC-PRIVATE PARTNERSHIP FOR THE RESTORATION OF DEGRADED FOREST RESERVE THROUGH VCS AND FSC CERTIFIED PLANTATIONS USD 10 million May 2016 TABLE OF CONTENTS TABLE OF CONTENTS I ACRONYMS II COVER PAGE 1 BACKGROUND 4 PROJECT DESCRIPTION 11 FIT WITH FIP INVESTMENT CRITERIA 15 CONCLUSION AND RECOMMENDATIONS 19 ANNEX 1: INVESTMENTS IN SUSTAINABLE FORESTRY – A BRIEF PRESENTED TO AFDB’S CREDIT COMMITTEE 19 i ACRONYMS AfDB African Development Bank CIF Climate Investment Funds DSCR Debt Service Coverage Ratio ESAP Environmental Assessment Procedures FAO Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations FC Ghana Forest Commission FIP Forest Investment Program FSC Forest Stewardship Council FWP Forest and Wildlife Policy 1994 GoG Government of Ghana IP Investment Plan ISS Integrated Safeguards System ITTO The International Tropical Timber Organization NFPDP National Forest Plantation Development Program PPP Public-Private Partnership REDD+ Reducing Emissions from Deforestation and Forest Degradation VCS Verified Carbon Standard ii COVER PAGE Public-Private Partnership for the restoration of Degraded Forest Reserve through VCS and FSC Certified Plantations. 1. Country/Region: Ghana 2. CIF Project ID#: (Trustee will assign ID) 3. Source of Funding: FIP PPCR SREP 4. Project/Program Title: Ghana: Public-Private Partnership for the restoration of Degraded Forest Reserve through VCS and FSC Certified Plantations. 5. Type of CIF Investment: Public Private Mixed 6. Funding Request in million Grant: Non-Grant: USD equivalent: USD 10 million Concessional Loan 7. Implementing MDB(s): African Development Bank 8. National Implementing Not Applicable. Agency: 9. MDB Focal Point and Headquarters- Focal Point: TTL: Project/Program Task Gareth Phillips Richard Fusi [email protected] / Team Leader (TTL): [email protected] / Leandro Azevedo [email protected] 10. -
Achievements of the Center for International Forestry Research
Achievements of the Center for International Forestry Research (CIFOR) 1998–2005 Achievements of the Center for International Forestry Research (CIFOR) 1998–2005 © 2005 by CIFOR All rights reserved. Published in 2005 Cover photo by Daniel Tiveau Published by Center for International Forestry Research Jl. CIFOR, Situ Gede, Sindang Barang Bogor Barat 16680, Indonesia Tel.: +62 (251) 622622; Fax: +62 (251) 622100 E-mail: [email protected] Web site: http://www.cifor.cgiar.org Contents Highlights 1 Forests & Governance 1 Environmental Services & Sustainable Use of Forests 1 Forests & Livelihoods 2 Multi-programme/General 3 I. Introduction 4 II. CIFOR and the Mission of the CGIAR 6 III. National and Local Impacts 8 A. Major multi-country research projects 8 Causes of deforestation 8 Criteria and indicators of sustainable forest management (C&I) 9 Forest Finance and Pulp and Paper 11 Non-timber forest products (NTFPs) 14 Adaptive collaborative management (ACM) 16 Decentralisation of Forest Management 19 Secondary forests and forest rehabilitation 20 Adoption of sustainable management practices in natural forests 22 Creating mechanisms for national policy debates 23 B. The Malinau Research Forest (MRF) in Indonesia 23 C. Building research capacity in developing countries 25 IV. Infl uencing Global Actors 29 A. Infl uencing large global actors 29 Multilateral agencies and inter-governmental processes 29 B. Infl uencing broad global audiences 42 Forest Policy Experts Listserve (POLEX) 43 Publications 44 CIFOR in Google Scholar 48 International Workshops and Conferences 48 Mass Media 49 CIFOR Web Page 52 VIII. Conclusion 53 Achievements of the Center for International Forestry Research (CIFOR) 1998–2005 Highlights Forests & Governance The Forest Stewardship Council (FSC) used research on criteria and indicators of sustainable forest management (C&I) by CIFOR and its partners as an input to the standards it used to certify 5.8 million ha of forest in the tropics. -
Private Governance of Protected Areas in Africa: Case Studies, Lessons Learnt and Conditions of Success
Program on African Protected Areas & Conservation (PAPACO) PAPACO study 19 Private governance of protected areas in Africa: case studies, lessons learnt and conditions of success @B. Chataigner Sue Stolton and Nigel Dudley Equilibrium Research & IIED Equilibrium Research offers practical solutions to conservation challenges, from concept, to implementation, to evaluation of impact. With partners ranging from local communities to UN agencies across the world, we explore and develop approaches to natural resource management that balance the needs of nature and people. We see biodiversity conservation as an ethical necessity, which can also support human wellbeing. We run our own portfolio of projects and offer personalised consultancy. Prepared for: IIED under contract to IUCN EARO Reproduction: This publication may be reproduced for educational or non-profit purposes without special permission, provided acknowledgement to the source is made. No use of this publication may be made for resale or any other commercial purpose without permission in writing from Equilibrium Research. Citation: Stolton, S and N Dudley (2015). Private governance of protected areas in Africa: Cases studies, lessons learnt and conditions of success. Bristol, UK, Equilibrium Research and London, UK, IIED Cover: Private conservancies in Namibia and Kenya © Equilibrium Research Contact: Equilibrium Research, 47 The Quays Cumberland Road, Spike Island Bristol, BS1 6UQ, UK Telephone: +44 [0]117-925-5393 www.equilibriumconsultants.com Page | 2 Contents 1. Executive summary -
Godere (Ethiopia), Budongo (Uganda) and Kakamega (Kenya)
EFFECTS OF ANTHROPOGENIC DISTURBANCE ON THE DIVERSITY OF FOLIICOLOUS LICHENS IN TROPICAL RAINFORESTS OF EAST AFRICA: GODERE (ETHIOPIA), BUDONGO (UGANDA) AND KAKAMEGA (KENYA) Dissertation Zur Erlangung des akademischen Grades eines Doktors der Naturwissenschaft Fachbereich 3: Mathematik/Naturwissenschaften Universität Koblenz-Landau Vorgelegt am 23. Mai 2008 von Kumelachew Yeshitela geb. am 11. April 1965 in Äthiopien Referent: Prof. Dr. Eberhard Fischer Korreferent: Prof. Dr. Emanuël Sérusiaux In Memory of my late mother Bekelech Cheru i Table of Contents Abstract……………………………………………………………………………….......…...iii Chapter 1. GENERAL INTRODUCTION.................................................................................1 1.1 Tropical Rainforests .........................................................................................................1 1.2 Foliicolous lichens............................................................................................................5 1.3 Objectives .........................................................................................................................8 Chapter 2. GENERAL METHODOLOGY..............................................................................10 2.1 Foliicolous lichen sampling............................................................................................10 2.2 Foliicolous lichen identification.....................................................................................10 2.3 Data Analysis..................................................................................................................12