DOCSLIB.ORG

(Public Pack)To Follow Agenda Supplement for Development Control Committee, 07/03/2017 18:30

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
(Public Pack)To Follow Agenda Supplement for Development Control Committee, 07/03/2017 18:30 DEVELOPMENT CONTROL COMMITTEE TUESDAY, 7TH MARCH 2017, 6.30 PM COUNCIL CHAMBER, TOWN HALL, CHORLEY I am now able to enclose, for consideration at the above meeting of the Development Control Committee, the following reports that were unavailable when the agenda was published. Agenda No Item A 16/00926/FULMAJ - BRINSCALL MILL ROAD, WHEELTON (Pages 27 - 44) B 16/00633/OUTMAJ - GLEADHILL HOUSE STUD, GLEADHILL (Pages 45 - 60) HOUSE, DAWBERS LANE, EUXTON E 16/00510/OUTMAJ - CHARTER LANE, CHARNOCK RICHARD (Pages 61 - 78) F 17/00038/FULMAJ - CHORLEY RUGBY UNION CLUB, (Pages 79 - 82) CHANCERY ROAD, ASTLEY VILLAGE, CHORLEY, PR7 1XP 4 APPEALS AND OTHER DECISIONS (Pages 83 - 104) Report of the Director (Customer and Digital) enclosed. GARY HALL CHIEF EXECUTIVE Electronic agendas sent to Members of the Development Control Committee If you need this information in a different format, such as larger print or translation, please get in touch on 515151 or chorley.gov.uk Meeting contact Nina Neisser on 01257 515118 or email [email protected] This page is intentionally left blank Agenda Page 27 Agenda Item 3a APPLICATION REPORT – 16/00926/FULMAJ Validation Date: 31 October 2016 Ward: Pennine Type of Application: Major Full Planning Proposal: Rehabilitation centre, comprising pool complex, gym and therapy building, seventeen accommodation cabins, car park, access road, running (sprint) track and associated plant. Location: Land 100M East Of Wheelton House Brinscall Mill Road Wheelton Case Officer: Mrs Helen Lowe Applicant: Ms Ann Nikolakis Agent: John Welbank Consultation expiry: 1 December 2016 Decision due by: 10 February 2017 _______________________________________________________________________________________ Members will recall that determination of this application was deferred at the previous DC Committee to allow a site visit to take place. The applicant has provided additional information to support the application which is summarised below. The original report, and addendum to that report then follow. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION PROVIDED BY THE APPLICANT The applicant has provided a very detailed response to the committee report which is summarised below: Planning policy: The applicant comments that the main issue seems to be prioritisation of Local Plan policy BNE2 above the Core strategy plus the Rural Development SPD. Within the Core Strategy, ‘Policy 1: Locating Growth’ there is the allowance for exceptional circumstances. The applicant notes that the committee report accepts that there are no sequentially preferable sites and that there is unlikely to be any impact on existing town centre facilities. On this basis the applicant suggests that the requirements of the Rural Development SPD have been met. The applicant considers that an urban or even urban fringe environment will simply not provide the functional requirements for the business. Landscape Impact Assessment : The applicant states that the simple reason that an assessment was not undertaken is because it wasn’t requested following the pre application enquiry and they were only asked for some landscape artists impressions which were provided. They state that the first time they were aware about this when they read the committee report. Ecology and trees: The applicant still rejects the reference to ‘sites of high ecological value’ and contends that there is no detail on what was being suggested. They feel that generally poor ecological advice has been provided that is not backed up with any evidence. With regard to trees, they are happy to increase tree planting and work with the tree officer to come up with an Agenda Page 28 Agenda Item 3a acceptable mitigation strategy and suggest that this could include some additional habitat creation but without knowing what this needs to be its difficult for them to assess. Around 140 ‘low value’ trees would be removed. They applicant has confirmed that they would be happy to plant an additional 500 elsewhere. Suggested species could include oak, alder and birch. They have confirmed that they would be happy for a condition to be applied to produce a tree mitigation plan that was acceptable to the tree officer. Highways: The applicant considers that there are lots of highway issues that they don’t agree with including policy, local roads etc. Again they would be happy to relook at design providing they are reasonable and only involved the applicant’s land – suggestions are made in the response and the applicant considers that this could be subject to an agreeable condition. The applicant contends that comments made by the Highways Department ignore national planning guidance with regard to rural developments The supplied Transport Statement and Green Travel Plan included detailed sections on pedestrian, cycle, public transport options and highway accident. It provided estimates for access and trip generation and a Transport Management Plan identifying percentage of patients and staff using the various forms of transport to and from the site along with timings. The Green Travel Plan detailed how the site would provide its own minibus service for both staff and patients, how this service would be encouraged and marketed and the monitoring processes that would be put in place so that the service can be improved over time. On this basis the applicant suggests that the Transport Statement should be more than sufficient information for an assessment to be made. RESPONSE The following consultees have responded to the additional information that has been provided: LCC Highways: The highway authority uses thresholds based on size or scale of land use to determine whether or not a development proposal should be accompanied by a Transport Assessment or a Transport Statement. As a guide, for the proposed use class, any development in excess of 1500M2 must be accompanied by a Transport Assessment (TA) and a Travel Plan. The scale of the current proposal is 4203m2 which is far in excess of the guide threshold, yet in the further information provided; the applicant seems insistent that, the Transport Statement (TS) which accompanied the application submission was sufficient and should be accepted. However, as explained in the highways response, the TS is a simplified version of the required TA which would have provided a more comprehensive and systematic process setting out the transport issues of the development. If the TA had been submitted, it would have helped identify the measures to be taken to deal with the anticipated transport impacts of the development and also measures to be taken to improve accessibility of the site by walking, cycling and use of public transport. By failing to submit a TA, the transport issues have not been fully appraised and suitable mitigation measures have not been identified. As explained, the applicant appears not to have given consideration to whether or not a safe and suitable access to the site can be achieved for all people as the NPPF requires of large developments as proposed. In the further information submitted, the applicant appears to assume that the site would always be accessed via Chapel Lane and as such, did not see the need for an assessment to be made of Tithebarn Lane, which seems inappropriate. The applicant did not carry out any assessment of the junction of the A674 Blackburn New Road and Chapel Lane to see how the proposed development would impact the junction. To reiterate, the NPPF requires developments that generate significant movements to be located where there would be little need to travel and where use of sustainable transport modes can be maximised, including public transport use. As pointed out, the site is located in an area of low accessibility. The only two roads in the area have no footways and no improvements are proposed to the public rights of way and the only proposed cycle route in the area for improved accessibility of the site. It is noted that the applicant proposes improvements to the access for Agenda Page 29 Agenda Item 3a better visibility and two passing places along the site access. While these measures are welcomed, they are not considered adequate for improved accessibility of the site. The applicant has therefore not sufficiently exploited opportunities for use of sustainable transport modes and that the cumulative highway impacts have not been appropriately quantified and assessed. It is therefore recommended that approval of the application be resisted. GMEU have commented that they do not have anything further to add to their previous comments as no new information has been provided. As previously stated the mitigation put forward for the impact of the proposal is limited and overall there appears to be no compensation for the loss of the habitats present. OTHER MATTERS The HSE have commented that it has been identified that the swimming pool and gym are of vulnerable construction. Part of these structures fall within the vulnerable building safeguarding zone. The HSE are, therefore, reviewing the justification of the safeguarding zones and will provide a full response in due course. Comments are awaited from the Council’s Parks and Open Spaces Officer (a qualified Landscape architect) and will be reported on the addendum. Conclusion On the basis of the above, it is still considered that the applicant has failed to demonstrate that the proposal would not give rise to any undue harm to highway safety or give rise to harmful ecological impacts. It is the responsibility of the applicant to provide supporting information and appropriate mitigative measures, not to rely upon these to be provided by the consultees as they appear to suggest in the additional information that has been submitted since the last Committee meeting . In summary, the it is still considered that the proposal is not appropriate in an area of other open countryside. No further information to demonstrate the need for the facility has been provided, such as information from Salford University, that it is stated the applicant is working with.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • 5. Network Planning for Walking
    Central Lancashire Walking and Cycling Delivery Plan 5. Network Planning for Walking The future walking network has been derived through identifying those areas which would benefit from creating a sustainable link between trip origins and trip destinations within a reasonable walking distance of approximately 2km. Trip origins predominantly include densely populated residential areas and trip destinations include educational, employment and retail areas which are likely to attract a significant number of trips. As part of this process, funnel routes have been identified which incorporate the route which most pedestrians will follow to access a particular destination, however given the diverse nature of pedestrian movements, the routes do not extend into particular destinations since the route of each individual user will vary depending on their individual trip origin/end. In alignment with LCWIP guidance, Core Walking Zones have also been identified from identifying the area within each town which encompasses the greatest amount of trip attractors and therefore likely the generate the greatest levels of walking. The Four Core Walking Zones (CWZ) identified are: • Preston CWZ; • Lostock Hall CWZ; • Leyland CWZ; and • Chorley CWZ. 41 Central Lancashire Walking and Cycling Delivery Plan 5.1 Proposed Walking Routes 5.1.1 Preston Core Walking Zone Figure 5-1 Preston CWZ / Funnel Routes The Preston CWZ proposals will improve facilities for both pedestrians and cyclists alike, making it safer and easier to access Preston inner city centre, UCLAN, Cardinal Newman College, and transport hubs such as Preston Railway and Bus Stations. Measures predominantly involve pedestrian priority / informal streets, to improve the safety and accessibility of the town centre for pedestrians.
    [Show full text]
  • Faircloughhouse
    Chorley, Lancashire, PR7 4EX FAIRCLOUGHHOUSE TO LET High Quality Office Accommodation • Modern purpose built offices • Secure site with gatehouse • Deceptively well located for road and rail links • Excellent car parking with 1 space per 187 ft2 of accommodation • Workshop/storage unit accommodation available • Flexible offer with a range of accommodation options subject to terms 2 9,138 – 42,030 ft (849 – 3,905 m2) on a site of 1.27 ha (3.13 acres) ESCENT A DESCRIPTION 6 W 100.6m ES The property comprises purpose built office accommodation over 3 floors T H O UG A 6 located within three wings (the south wing added at a later date). The HT O N property was constructed around 1991 and is of steel frame construction with R O A D solid floors, suspended ceilings and Cat II lighting. The external walls are of 3 2 brick / block cavity construction with glazing in the form of continuous bands. 5 9 The building benefits from two separate main entrances enabling the property 2 to be multi let therefore the floors are easily sub-divisible by floor or by wing. The 1 4 7 building has undergone a considerable amount of refurbishment externally and the final wing of the building was refurbished in 2006. Fairclough 3 96.9m 7 House 3 5 3 7 a The internal specification of the building includes the following: 33 • Full air conditioning 2 5 • Category II lighting T ST Depot CHURCH ST GABBO PH • Perimeter trunking 6 4 • Passenger lift serving all floors RE E • Canteen T A separate industrial unit on the site is constructed with a steel frame and 96.9m 2 is clad externally with profile metal sheeting and is fitted out as a number of 3 1 small cellular offices along with storage accommodation.
    [Show full text]
  • Moorland Gate Business Park A6/M61, OFF COWLING ROAD, CHORLEY, PR6 9DR to LET/IMMEDIATELY AVAILABLE
    WAREHOUSE, OFFICE & LAND OPPORTUNITIES FROM 268 SQ FT ( 25 SQ M) TO 27,007 SQ FT ( 2,509 SQ M) Moorland Gate Business Park A6/M61, OFF COWLING ROAD, CHORLEY, PR6 9DR TO LET/IMMEDIATELY AVAILABLE Business development situated in the heart of the North West of England Adjacent to the M61 Secure estate with barrier entry Excellent transport links Direct links to Manchester, Bolton and Preston Description Availability The estate comprises a mix of industrial units Offices and warehouse units together with a single and three-storey office are available ranging from building. There is also a small gate house which has 268 sq ft up to 25,578 sq ft. been converted to office use. A large area of hard- standing is used for truck or bus storage and a further Please see attached schedule area of 2 acres provides open storage. of availability. Plot 3 6 On-site parking for approximately 130 cars is adjacent to the offices. There is good vehicle access throughout the site for HGVs. The estate has a single point of entry A6 7 7c 7a provided with gatehouse and barrier entry system. M61/J8 There is a range of warehousing on site to suit small B6228 businesses as well as larger logistics/manufacturing Moorland Gate Plot 2 operations. The larger units benefit from minimum 8.8m Business Park 3 4 5 eaves heights and all units benefit from solid concrete floors, lighting, drive-in loading doors, three phase Brooke Street electricity and excellent external circulation space. WCs and offices are also available on site.
    [Show full text]
  • Overview and Scrutiny Task Group - Tourism and Promoting Chorley
    Overview and Scrutiny Task Group - Tourism and Promoting Chorley Agenda and Reports For consideration on Wednesday, 12th October 2011 In Committee Room 1, Town Hall, Chorley At 6.00 pm This page is intentionally left blank Town Hall Market Street Chorley Lancashire PR7 1DP 07 October 2011 Dear Colleague OVERVIEW AND SCRUTINY TASK GROUP - TOURISM AND PROMOTING CHORLEY - WEDNESDAY, 12TH OCTOBER 2011 You are invited to attend a meeting of the Overview and Scrutiny Task Group - Tourism and Promoting Chorley to be held in Committee Room 1, Town Hall, Chorley on Wednesday, 12th October 2011 commencing at 6.00 pm . AGENDA 1. Apologies for absence 2. 2. Declarations of Any Interests Members are reminded of their responsibility to declare any personal interest in respect of matters contained in this agenda. If the interest arises only as result of your membership of another public body or one to which you have been appointed by the Council then you only need to declare it if you intend to speak. If the personal interest is a prejudicial interest, you must withdraw from the meeting. Normally you should leave the room before the business starts to be discussed. You do, however, have the same right to speak as a member of the public and may remain in the room to enable you to exercise that right and then leave immediately. In either case you must not seek to improperly influence a decision on the matter. 3. Minutes (Pages 1 - 2) To confirm the enclosed minutes of the Overview and Scrutiny Task Group – Tourism and Promoting Chorley meeting held on 14 September 2011.
    [Show full text]
  • Preferred Options
    Preferred Options Site Allocations and Development Management Policies Development Plan Document – Appendices November/December 2011 C O N T E N T S Appendix 1 – Development Management Policies ......................................................1 Appendix 2 – Preferred Sites To Be Taken Forward .................................................11 Appendix 3 – Proposed Sites Not To Be Taken Forward ..........................................19 Appendix 4a – Central Lancashire Submission Core Strategy, Infrastructure Delivery Schedule Tables....................................................................................22 Appendix 4b – South Ribble Infrastructure, taken from the Central Lancashire Submission Core Strategy, Infrastructure Delivery Schedule (Appendix 4a).......30 Appendix 5 – Retail Maps..........................................................................................33 Leyland.................................................................................................................. 33 Penwortham .......................................................................................................... 34 Bamber Bridge....................................................................................................... 35 Tardy Gate............................................................................................................. 36 Longton.................................................................................................................. 37 Kingsfold...............................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Chorlev Lynx Rugby League Football Club
    CHORLEV LYNX RUGBY LEAGUE FOOTBALL CLUB NORTHERN FORD PREMIERSHIP NORTHERN FORD Chorley Lynx vOldham Sunday 14th July 2002 Kick-Off S.OOp .m. Match Sponsor: Kevills Solicitors Match Ball &Programme Sponsor: D. Stringfellow Plastering Contractors pnmmummp Box Sponsor: Digital Sales Producers and suppliers of high quality bread, rolls and confectionary. Specialists in barmcakes, batons, soup rolls and plaits. Suppliers to the NHS, Catering Companies, Hotels and Shops BAKERY SHOP OPEN DAILY 8.30 a.m. -1.30 p.m. Baker Street, CoppuU PR7 5UH Telephone: 01257 471101 Fax: 01257 471082 Chorley Lynx vOldam o CHORLEY m LYNX RUGBY LEAGUE FOOTBALL CLUB OFFICIALS WELCOME from Chairman Henry Morris Chairman: Ibday we welcome Oldham to Victory Park for HENRY MORRIS what we fully expect to be as usual avery tough Directors: match. GERRY HAMILTON JOHN MARK STUART SMART Chris Hamilton the Oldham Chairman u n f o r t u n a t e l y h a s r e c e n t l y l o s t h i s h e a d c o a c h Club Secretary: M I C K W E A R M O U T H John Harbin to Oldham Football Club, but Iam sure Chris will turn this negative into aPositive Chorley Sporting Club Manager: as he has faced difficult situations. D E N N I S R A M S D A L E Head Coach: At Chorley we always welcome the G R A E M E W E S T knowledgeable Oldham supporters and Ihope you enjoy your day out at Victory Park.
    [Show full text]
  • Question and Answer Session with Some of Our Year 11
    I S S U E 1 OCTOBER 2016 Dear Parents and Carers 89% of pupils with 91% - 95% attendance achieved 5+ A*- C HIGHLIGHTS What a fantastic start to the including English and Maths term we have had! p.3 Welcome Year 66% of pupils with 86%-90% 7! Our Year 7 pupils are set- attendance achieved 5+ A*- C tling in well and quickly be- including English and Maths p. 4 Meet the new coming part of ‘Team St School Council Michael’s’. They look ex- 14% of pupils with attendance tremely smart in their new below 85% achieved 5+ A* - C p. 6 Results Day uniforms, are trying many including English and Maths question and answer session Celebrations of the extra-curricular en- with some of our Year 11 richment activities on offer We are looking forward to pupils in their Religious Edu- p.7-8 Christian and making new friends. celebrating with Year 11 on cation lessons. We will end Values Enrichment Wednesday 30th November our term on Friday with a Day Pupils in other year groups when Mrs Julie Heaton, for- Eucharist service available for are responding to the chal- mer headteacher, will be pupils in addition to our usual p.11 Visit from the lenges of their studies: Year our principal guest at Worship services. Bishop 11 commencing their final Awards Evening, when year with us, both Years 9 GCSE certificates and prizes Mr Chadwick and Miss p.13 The Breck and 10 embarking on their will be distributed. Sephton have embraced their Foundation GCSE courses and Year 8, new roles as Deputy who will begin to start It is such an honour to lead Headteachers.
    [Show full text]
  • Infrastructure Delivery Schedule
    Report of Meeting Date Central Lancashire LDF Joint LDF Officer Team 23 June 2010 Joint Advisory Committee INFRASTRUCTURE DELIVERY SCHEDULE PURPOSE OF REPORT 1. To inform Members of the Infrastructure Delivery Schedule. RECOMMENDATION(S) 2. For Members to endorse the approach in producing the Schedule. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY OF REPORT 3. The Infrastructure Delivery Schedule aims to identify the essential strategic infrastructure required to deliver the Publication Core Strategy Strategic Sites and Locations as well as the broader distribution and quantity of residential and employment development. The draft Schedule represents work in progress but will be essential supporting material for the Inspector's examination of the Core Strategy. 4. It has been difficult to reach a clear understanding with the various infrastructure providers and now with the prospect of public sector financial cuts it is far less certain what resources will be available from national funding sources. This will place a greater reliance on developers to fund infrastructure. The Core Strategy proposes a levy/tariff type approach to securing developer contributions for infrastructure to make up for funding shortfalls that are not able to be met directly by infrastructure providers or by other means. Further work will need to be done to fully assess the economic viability of levy/tariff levels for different types of development once it is clear how local authorities can introduce such a mechanism. REASONS FOR RECOMMENDATION(S) (If the recommendations are accepted) 5. To make members aware of the proposed Infrastructure Delivery Schedule. ALTERNATIVE OPTIONS CONSIDERED AND REJECTED 6. None Central Lancashire Local Development Framework Report Template BACKGROUND 7.
    [Show full text]
  • Investing in Your Home Pages 5-8
    StreetTalkIssue 21 – Spring 2018 News from Progress Housing Group Investing in your home pages 5-8 Charity football match Manchester City Legends vs Progress Housing Group staff, Saturday 12 May, kick off 2pm at Lancashire FA in Leyland. Visit www.progressgroup.org.uk/mascot to register your child to be a mascot on the day. Data Protection - change is coming page 9 Annual gardening competition 2018 page 17 Building Better Opportunities page 21 Welcome to your Head Office: Sumner House, tenants´ newsletter 21 King Street, Leyland, Lancashire, PR25 2LW Open Monday to Friday StreetTalk Reception 8.30am-4.30pm Warwick House, This issue gives you important Kilnhouse Lane, Lytham St Annes, FY8 3DU information about our maintenance Monday to Thursday and improvements programme for Reception 9.30am-12.30pm Friday - closed the year ahead (see page 5-8). Progress Connect 03333 204555 Find out in the Independent Times section on page 13 to 16 what Monday to Friday 8am-6pm activities and events tenants living in our independent living schemes have planned for the coming months. Live web chat Monday to Friday 9am-5pm An article on page 9 explains that the Data Protection Act is being Repairs 03333 204555 updated and this brings with it new rules and regulations on how we [email protected] can communicate with you. We will no longer be able to send you www.progressgroup.org.uk StreetTalk unless you have specifically requested it. Please can you take Website five minutes to complete and return a newsletter consultation form on www.progressgroup.org.uk page 12, many thanks! Email [email protected] As always, we are delighted to receive your contributions to StreetTalk.
    [Show full text]
  • Central Lancashire Community Infrastructure Levy
    CENTRAL LANCASHIRE COMMUNITY INFRASTRUCTURE LEVY DRAFT REGULATION 123 LIST October 2012 ______________________________________________________________________ Central Lancashire covers the administrative areas of Preston City Council, South Ribble Borough Council and Chorley Council This page is intentionally left blank Central Lancashire Community Infrastructure Levy Introduction The following list is in draft form and therefore does not enjoy any formal status. It has been prepared purely for illustrative purposes in association with the consultation and subsequent Examination of the Community Infrastructure Draft Charging Schedules that are being progressed to adoption by the Central Lancashire Authorities of Preston, South Ribble and Chorley. The purpose of the list is to demonstrate the broad range and type of infrastructure that it is likely the authorities will seek to spend CIL funds upon. This is a ‘living’ document and will be the subject of on-going update and monitoring. Regulation123 List for 2013/14 CIL Regulation 123 restricts the use of planning obligations for infrastructure that will be funded in whole or in part by the Community Infrastructure Levy, to ensure no duplication between the two types of developer contributions. Regulation 123(2) of the Community Infrastructure Levy Regulation 2010 states, ‘A planning obligation may not constitute a reason for granting planning permission for the development to the extent that the obligation provides for the funding or provision of relevant infrastructure’. A CIL charging authority is expected to publish a list of infrastructure that it intends will benefit from CIL on its website. The Central Lancashire Authorities can review this list at least once a year as part of its monitoring of CIL collection and expenditure.
    [Show full text]
  • Master Pages 2-18 2011
    UNCONTROLLED WHEN PRINTED Introduction This Depot Appendix has been developed based on an idea from Newcastle Depot and after consultation at Driver Manager Group and Local Operations Focus Group it was decided that it should be rolled out across the company as best practice. This Depot Appendix should be used in conjunction with all other publications which include: your Rule Book, Sectional Appendix, Professional Driving/Conductor Handbook and Traction Manuals. Special thanks must go to all concerned in the production of this publication including all the Instructor Drivers and D.T.M.s at Manchester Piccadilly and especially to Buxton Driver Don Coffey who has spent an enormous amount of time at his computer working on the graphics. Early in 2013 various ammendments were made which included the new contact details for BTP and also a lot of information that would be useful to conductors and this resulted in it being issued to them also. Index Subject Page Number Introduction 2 Telephone Numbers: Main Numbers and Control 3 Telephone Numbers: Signaller Phone Numbers 4 Local Instructions 5 Multi-SPAD Signals 5 Areas of Low Adhesion 6 Northern Lines of Route Risk Assessment 6 Hot Spots! 7 Semaphore signal number guide 8 OFF Indicators 9-10 Northern Contingency Plan 11 Station Address and Post Codes 12-14 Its behind You 15 Easy Access Area (EEA's) 16 ECO Driving 17-18 Fire and Hazchem Module Attached Your modules each contain an index Attached Notes We have been made aware that some of the ground position lights in these maps do not exactly replicate the actual signal at the location.
    [Show full text]
  • Agenda Reports Pack PDF 248 KB
    Chief Executive’s Office Please ask for: Miss R Hawes Direct Dial: (01257) 515118 E-mail address: [email protected] Your Ref: Our Ref: RH/AJS Town Hall Doc ID: Market Street Date: 19 July 2005 Chorley Lancashire Chief Executive: PR7 1DP Jeffrey W Davies MA LLM Dear Councillor A meeting of the Disability Liaison Group is to be held in the Committee Room, Town Hall, Chorley on Monday, 25th July, 2005 commencing at 5.45 pm . A buffet tea will be provided from 5.15pm. I hope that you will be able to attend. AGENDA 1. Welcome 2. Apologies for Absence 3. Minutes of the last meeting a) To confirm as a correct record the minuted of the meeting of the Disability Liaison Group held on 18 April 2005 (enclosed) (Pages 1 - 4) b) Matters arising not otherwise on the agenda 4. Access to Chorley Borough Council Services by DIsabled People Discussion item. 5. Update on Town Hall/Lancastrian Alterations Discussion with Strzala Architects 6. Ongoing Issues (Pages 5 - 8) A schedule prepared by the Head of Property Services is enclosed listing issues that have been considered at past meetings of the Liaison Group and summarising the action that has either been taken by Officers or is proposed to be instigated on matters in respect of: Pavements, Dropped Kerbs, Road Crossings, General Highway Issues, Parking and Other Issues. Continued…. (01257) 515151 Fax (01257) 515150 www.chorley.gov.uk 7. Communication Discussion Item. 8. Any other item(s) the Chair decides is/are urgent Yours sincerely z Chief Executive Distribution 1.
    [Show full text]