Saturn V Flight Manual

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Saturn V Flight Manual SATURN V FLIGHT MANUAL SA 5O7 THIS PUBLICATION REPLACES MSFC-MAN-607 DATED 16 AUGUST 1969 FOR VEHICLE SA-607; HOWEVER MEFC-MAN.607 DATED I5 AUGUST 19611 REMAINS THE BASE LINE MAN_:,_,_ FOR SA.61M ANO SA-rd)9. 15 AUGUST1969 CHAN6ED50CTOItln t969 "1 I:"_1D! ................................... ° 15 AU6UST1969 CHAHSED 50CTOItEI 1969 ___J r. _ r Reproduction for Hn-gowrmwnt uoe of t_ inl_m_ti4m of lilust_iege mmtsl_d in this publication Is not permitted without s_ifi¢ _qn_nI! of the Jsoui_ service. line in the outer margtns oY the page. TOT_J.NUMBEROF PAGESIN THIS PUBLICATION IS 246, CONSISTING OF THE FOLLOMING: lie Imue * 1]tie ........................... S OCt 1969 * A .............................. $ Oct 1969 6-2 ............................... Oripal i................. • 6-3 .............................. $ Oct 1969 64 Itum 6-10 ....................... Orqinal *',,00 ,,, O_J_d °6-11 tlml 6-12 .................... $Oct 1967 * ill. .S Oct 1969 6-13 thin 6-16 ...................... Ol_q_.l • 6-17 ............................. $ Oct 1969 I-1 thru 1-3 ........................ * i-4 ............................. $ Oct 1969 6-18 tluu 6-33 ...................... O_inal I-S 6-34 Blank ......................... "_i_inal "'''°°''''''' .......... ° ,.°..,, O_i_ • I-6 ............................. 5 Oct 1969 7-1 tent 7-21 ....................... O_l_nal • 7-22 ............................ 5 Oct 1q69 1-7 thru 1-9 ........................ Original 7-23 .............................. Orisinat * !-i0 Blank ......................... Original • 7-24 thru 7-25 .................... 5 Oct 1969 * 2-1 thru 2 20 ..................... 5 Oct 1969 • 3-1 ............................. $ Oct 1969 7-26 thru 7-30 ...................... O_inal 8-1 tima 8-20 ....................... OriginaJ 3-2 thru 3-10 ....................... Original • 8-21 tlma 8-23 .................... 5 OCt 1969 * 3-11 thru 3-22 .................... 5 Oct 1969 8-24 tluru8-26 ...................... Ori_nal * 3-23 Added ...................... 5 Oct 1969 9-i thin 9-13 ....................... Ori_nal • 3-24 Blank Added ................. 5 Oct 1969 • 9-14 _ 9-16 .................... 5 OCt 1969 4-1 thru 4-3 ........................ Oristnal 9-17 * 4-4 ............................. 5 Oct 1969 .......... Ori_nal 4-5 thru 4-23 ....................... Original • 10-1 thru 10-7 .................... 5 OCt 1969 0 4-24 Bia_l,. ......................... Original • 1041Bhmk ....................... 5 Oct 1969 5-1 thru 5-28 ....................... Original • A-! thru &-4 ...................... 5 Oct 1969 • 5-29 ............................. 5 Oct 1969 • B-i thai B-3 ..................... 5 Oct 1969 • 5-30 Blank ....................... 5 Oct 1969 • B-4 Blank ........................ •Oct 1969 * 6-1 ............................. 5 Oct 1969 • Index ! thn_ Index 7 ............... 5 Oct 1969 • Index 8 Blank .................... 5 Oct 1969 * The asterisk indicates pages changed, added, or deleted by the current change. B-I NASA Chanired 5 October 1969 tmr TABLEOFCONTENTS --cTuoH i Page General Del_flptteo ........................... I-1 SECTION II Performance ................................ 2-1 SECTION III Emergeacy Detectiqm end Precedms ................ 3-1 SECTION IV S-IC Stoge " • e • • • • • • e e e e e e e e ................. 4-1 SECTION V S-II Stage .................................. 5-1 SECTION Vl S-IVB Stage ................................. 6-1 SECTION VII Instrument Unit .............................. 7-1 SECTION VIII Ground Support Interface ......................... 8-1 SECTION IX Mission Control Monitoring ....................... 9-1 SECTION X Mission Yorioblos end Constraints ...... • ---....... .10-1 APPENDIX A Abbreviations and Acronyms °" " "°ee o'.ee..ee .eu..o A-I APPENDIX II Btbliogr_y ................................ B-I INDEX Alphobeticol .............................. Index I ( i/ii O &ATUItN V FLIOHT MAIWtAL | IIA.607 FOREWORD This manual was prepared to provide the astronaut with a sk_le mwce reference as to the characteristics and functions of the SA-$07 bunch vehicle and AS-S07 flight mission. Data on the SA-$08 and SA-509 launch vehicles and missions is included, however the 15 Aulpm 1969 manual serves as the baseline manual for these two vehicles. A change to the 15 August 1969 manual, incorporating the latest released data, w/ll be reJeued for etch vehicle, SA-$08 and SA-509, approximately 30 days prior to their respective leunch dates. The manual provides general miss/on and performance d|ita, emergency detection system information, a description of each stage and the IU, lind 8 general discussion of ground support facilities, equipment, and mimuon control. A bibliography identifies edait_,t_al references ff a !i more comprehensive study is de.red. Major hardware associated differences between the Saturn V launch vehicles SA-506 through ( SA-$09 are annotated in the manual. They are identified by reference numbers in the adjacent to the new information. These reference numbers refer to footnotes which are located at the end of each section. This manuat is for information only and is not a control document. If a conflict shoukl be discovered between the manual and a control document, the control document will rule. Recommended changes or corrections to this manual should be forwarded, in writing, to the Saturn V Systems Engineering Management Office (PM-SAT-E) MSFC, Attention: Mr. H. P. Lloyd; or the Crew Safety and Procedures Branch (CF-24), MSC. Attention: Mr. D. K. Warren. REVISION NOTE Manual MSFC-MAN-507, dated 15 August 1_69, was based on the G mimion. The information in this manual describes the vehicle configuration and mission characteristics as defined for the H-I nlission and was prepared from information available approximately thirty days prior to 5 October 1969, Each page changed to make this revision is identified by a change note at the bottom of the page. Changes of technical significance are identified on these pages by a black bar in the marBin opposite the change. Nontechnical changes such as recompt_ition of pages to accommodate new information, minor rewrite to clarify meaning and correction of typographical errors ave not identified by change bars. Changed 5 October 1969 IIIi1_ 1 i liimal ETmI I II __ TAll.| OF _ VEHICLE DESIGN GROUND RULES SATURN F SYS'I'£M DESCRIPTION .............. I-I LA vcHv mcL ossc irno ....... Nae s,4verv,,No NSTRUMelVr,,.I KI I I Safety criteria are identified by Air Force Eastern Test Range PERCEPTIBLE PRELA UNCH EVENTS ............ 1-9 (AI_:_['R) SafeW Manual 1274 and AFETR Regnlatior. 127-9. SATURN V IIYITEM DEI_RIPTION Crew safety coe._leratlom requil_d the development of an EmerlKSIcy Detection System (EDS) with equipment located The Saturn V system in its broadest scope includes throughout (he I_unch vehicle to detect emergency conceptual development, design, manufacture, conditions as they develop. If an emergency condition is transportation, assembly, test, and launch. The primary detected, this system will either initiate an automatic abort mimlon of the Saturn V launch vehicle, three-stage-to.m_pe sequeace, o5"display critical data to the flight crew for tl_ir boost hunch of an Apollo Spacecraft, establbhed the basic anab_ andreection. concept. This minion ! :eludes a suborbital start of the third stage (S-IVB) engine for final boost into earth orbit and Each powelrecl stage is defined with dual redundant range subsequent reignition to provide sufficient velocity for escape safety equipment which will effect engtne cutoff and miuiom including the lunar missions. propeSant dispersion in ,the event of a launch abort after liftoff. Engine cutoff results from closing valves and LAUNCH VEHICLE DEVELOPMENT terminating the flow of fuel and oxidizer. Propellant is disperaed by detonating linear-shaped charges, .thereby The Saturn launch vehicles are the product of a long longitudinally opening the propellant tanks. evolutionary process stemming from initial studim in 1957 of the Redstone and Jupiter missiles. Eady conceptual studies SuqwS_ration included outer proven missiles such as Thor and Titan, and conddered payloads ranging from earth orbiting satellites to The separation of the launch vehkle stages in flight required manned spacecraft such as Dynasoar, Mercury, Gemini. and desfljn studies Involving consideration of many parameters. eventually Apollo. such as time of separation, vehicle position, vehicle attitude. 'singieor dual plane separation, and the type. qnantity.and location of ordnance. The Saturn V launch vehicle evolved from the earlier Saturn vehicles as a result of the decision in 1961 to proceed with the Apollo manned hmar mission. As the Apollo mission The launch vehicle stages separate in flight by explosively definition became clear, conceptual design studies were severing a circumferential separation joint and firing made, considering such parameters as structural dynamics, retrococket motors to decelerate the spent stage. Stage stalPng dynamics, and propvlsiun dynamicL separation is initiated when stage thrust decay_ to a vah0e equal to or less than 10% of rated thrust. A short crest mode is used to allow sep_r_.._on of the spent stage, and to effect Design trade-offs were made in certain areas to optimize the ullage settling of the _cces_,e stage prior to engine ignitio|,. launch vehicle design, based on minion requirements. The beat combination of design parameters for liquid propellant A delayed dual plane separation is employed between the vehicles resulted in low accelerations and low dynamic
Recommended publications
  • Mobile Launcher Moves to Vehicle Assembly Building EGS MONTHLY HIGHLIGHTS
    National Aeronautics and Space Administration EXPLORATION GROUND SYSTEMS HIGHLIGHTS SEPTEMBER 2018 Mobile Launcher Moves to Vehicle Assembly Building EGS MONTHLY HIGHLIGHTS 3 Mobile launcher on the move 4 In the driver’s seat 5 Prepping for Underway Recovery Test 7 6 Employees, guests view ML move MOBILE LAUNCHER ON THE MOVE NASA’s mobile launcher is inside High Bay 3 at the Vehicle Assembly Building (VAB) on Sept. 11, 2018, at NASA’s Kennedy Space Center in Florida. Photo credit: NASA/Frank Michaux NASA’s mobile launcher, atop crawler-transporter 2, traveled from Launch Pad 39B to the Vehicle Assembly Building at the agency’s Kennedy Space Center in Florida, on Sept. 7, 2018. Arriving late in the afternoon, the mobile launcher stopped at the entrance to the VAB. Early the next day, Sept. 8, engineers and technicians rotated and extended the crew access arm near the top of the mobile launcher tower. Then the mobile launcher was moved inside High Bay 3, where it will spend about seven months undergoing verification and validation testing with the 10 levels of new work platforms, ensuring that it can provide support to the agency’s Space Launch System (SLS). The 380-foot-tall structure is equipped with the crew access Cliff Lanham, NASA project manager for the mobile launcher, takes a break arm and several umbilicals that will provide power, environmental to attend the employee event for the mobile launcher move to the Vehicle control, pneumatics, communication and electrical connections Assembly Building on Sept. 7, 2018, at NASA’s Kennedy Space Center in Florida.
    [Show full text]
  • Chapter 4: Environmental Consequences of Alternatives
    Final Constellation Programmatic Environmental Impact Statement 4. ENVIRONMENTAL CONSEQUENCES OF ALTERNATIVES The potential environmental consequences of both the National Aeronautics and Space Administration’s (NASA) Proposed Action (Preferred Alternative) to continue preparations for and to implement the Constellation Program, and the No Action Alternative, not continue preparations for nor implement the Constellation Program, are summarized in Chapter 2 and are presented in detail in this Chapter. In addition, this Chapter presents in Cumulative Impacts (see Section 4.3) the potential environmental consequences of two overlapping but individual NASA actions: implementing the Constellation Program and close-out of the Space Shuttle Program. 4.1 ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS OF THE PROPOSED ACTION (PREFERRED ALTERNATIVE) Under the Proposed Action, NASA would continue preparations for and implement the Constellation Program. This Program would involve activities at many U.S. Government and commercial facilities. Although detailed aspects of the Constellation Program and the full scope of the activities that might occur at each facility are not fully known, the activities described in Section 2.1 present enough information to broadly estimate the nature of the potential environmental impacts that might occur if NASA implements the Proposed Action. Figure 2-2 presents a high-level summary of the major Constellation Program activities that would be expected to occur at each of the primary U.S. Government facilities, as well as commercial facilities with the potential for significant environmental impacts. Given the long-term nature of the Constellation Program, and NASA’s desire to utilize as much of the Space Shuttle Program infrastructure as practicable, it is expected that over time, many of the existing facilities currently used by the Space Shuttle Program and planned to be used for the Constellation Program would require maintenance, upgrading, renovation, and/or replacement.
    [Show full text]
  • Merritt Island National Wildlife Refuge
    Merritt Island National Wildlife Refuge Comprehensive Conservation Plan U.S. Department of the Interior Fish and Wildlife Service Southeast Region August 2008 COMPREHENSIVE CONSERVATION PLAN MERRITT ISLAND NATIONAL WILDLIFE REFUGE Brevard and Volusia Counties, Florida U.S. Department of the Interior Fish and Wildlife Service Southeast Region Atlanta, Georgia August 2008 TABLE OF CONTENTS COMPREHENSIVE CONSERVATION PLAN EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ....................................................................................................................... 1 I. BACKGROUND ................................................................................................................................. 3 Introduction ................................................................................................................................... 3 Purpose and Need for the Plan .................................................................................................... 3 U.S. Fish And Wildlife Service ...................................................................................................... 4 National Wildlife Refuge System .................................................................................................. 4 Legal Policy Context ..................................................................................................................... 5 National Conservation Plans and Initiatives .................................................................................6 Relationship to State Partners .....................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Human Exploration and Operations: AA Perspective
    Human Exploration and Operations: AA Perspective Bill Gerstenmaier | April 22, 2013 Exploration is Human and Robotic 2 Mazlan Othman Director of the United Nations Office for Outer Space Affairs Former Director General of Angkasa, the Malaysian National Space Agency 3 68 Countries Have Participated in ISS Utilization Germany Israel Macedonia Ghana Italy Malaysia Argentina Peru Greece Japan Mali Australia Poland Guatemala Kazakhstan Mexico Austria Portugal Belarus Republic of Korea Belgium Republic of South Africa Bermuda Romania Bolivia Russia Brazil Senegal Bulgaria Slovenia Canada Spain Chile Sweden China Switzerland Columbia Taiwan Croatia Thailand Czech Republic Trinidad and Tobago Denmark Turkey Dominican Republic Ukraine Ecuador United Kingdom Egypt Uruguay Fiji United States Finland Venezuela Hungary Luxembourg The Netherlands Vietnam France India Kenya New Zealand Indonesia Kuwait Nigeria Ireland Lebanon Norway 4 Cube Satellites After Deployment from ISS The JEM Small Satellite Orbital Deployer being released from the airlock and extended into space in preparation to jettison satellites. 5 15 Countries Contributed to the First Results from Alpha Magnetic Spectrometer “The exact shape of the spectrum…extended to higher energies, will ulmately determine whether this spectrum originates from the collision of dark maer parcles or from pulsars in the galaxy. The high level of accuracy of this data shows that AMS will soon resolve this issue.” Credit: CERN Press Office release on paper in Physical Review Leers 6 CASIS Center for the Advancement of Science in Space CASIS Portfolio • Life Sciences • Earth observation / Remote sensing • Materials Science NASA released a Cooperative Agreement Notice (CAN) on February 14, 2011 for a • Technology Development (new) non-profit entity “to develop the capability to implement research and development projects utilizing the ISS National Board of Directors Laboratory.” The objectives stated in the CAN • The current CASIS Board was appointed in November, included: 2012.
    [Show full text]
  • DEC. 71999 National Park Service
    NFS Form 10-900 RECEIVED 2280 0MB No. 10024-0018 (Oct. 1990) United States Department of the Interior DEC. 71999 National Park Service NAT REGISTER OF HISTORIC PLACES National Register of Historic Places ' NATIONAL PARK SERVICE Registration Form This form is for use in nominating or requesting for individual properties and districts. See instructions in How to Complete the National Register of Historic Places Registration Form (National Register Bulletin 16A). Complete each item by Marking "x" in the appropriate box or by entering the information requested. If an item does not apply to the property being documented, enter "N/A" for "not applicable." For functions, architectural classification, materials, and areas of significance, enter only categories and subcategories from the instructions. Place additional entries and narrative items on continuation sheets (NPA Form 10-900a). Use a typewriter, word processor, or computer, to complete all items.______________________________________ 1. Name of Property________________________________ historic name Crawlerway_____________________________________________ other names/site number 8BR1689_______________________________ 2. Location street & number NASAr John F. Kennedy Space Center _not for publication city or town Kennedy Space Center______________ _______ _vicinity state Florida code FL county Brevard code_QM zip code 32899 3. State/Federal Agency Certification As the designated authority under the National Historic Preservation Act, as amended, I hereby certify that this X nomination ___ request for determination of eligibility meets the documentation standards for registering properties in the National Register of Historic Places and meets the procedural and professional requirements set forth in 36 CFR Part 60. In my opinion, the property X meets ___ does not meet the National Register criteria.
    [Show full text]
  • Mission Task Checklist
    MISSION TASK CHECKLIST Entryway Discovery (page 2) Astronaut Encounter (page 3) Astronaut Autograph (page 3) Where in the World? (page 4) Mission Patch (page 5) Wild Neighbors (page 6) NASA Speak (page 7) Journey To Mars: Explorers Wanted (page 7) The Orion spacecraft is the Science On A Sphere (page 8) crew vehicle NASA is Move the Galaxy (page 8) currently developing for future deep-space missions. Mapping Survey (page 9) Crew Conference (page 10) Shuttle Launch Experience (page 15) EXPEDITION Bus Tour (page16) Touch the Moon (page16) LOGBOOK Energy for the Future (page 11-12) From Sketchpad to Launchpad (page 13) Team Name: ______________________________ ISS Live! (page 14) Rocket Garden Rap (page 17) Commander (teacher): ______________________ Rocket Search (page 18) Pilot (chaperone): __________________________ Mission Specialist 1 (MS1): ________________________ For more cool information and activities, visit www.nasa.gov and click on the “For Students” tab! Mission Specialist 2 (MS2): ________________________ Mission Specialist 3 (MS3): ________________________ Mission Specialist 4 (MS4): ________________________ MISSION TASK: Rocket Search LOCATION: Rocket Garden Expedition 321 YOU ARE GO FOR LAUNCH The rockets on display here are real, space worthy rockets left over from the early days of space exploration. Unlike the space shuttle, they are all “expendable” rockets, which means they were designed to be used only once. Some of these were Welcome the Kennedy Space Center Visitor Complex, the only place surplus, while others were designed for missions that were later canceled. on Earth where human beings have left the planet, traveled to Find the following items in the Rocket Garden and in the Word Search puzzle.
    [Show full text]
  • STS-135: the Final Mission Dedicated to the Courageous Men and Women Who Have Devoted Their Lives to the Space Shuttle Program and the Pursuit of Space Exploration
    National Aeronautics and Space Administration STS-135: The Final Mission Dedicated to the courageous men and women who have devoted their lives to the Space Shuttle Program and the pursuit of space exploration PRESS KIT/JULY 2011 www.nasa.gov 2 011 2009 2008 2007 2003 2002 2001 1999 1998 1996 1994 1992 1991 1990 1989 STS-1: The First Mission 1985 1981 CONTENTS Section Page SPACE SHUTTLE HISTORY ...................................................................................................... 1 INTRODUCTION ................................................................................................................................... 1 SPACE SHUTTLE CONCEPT AND DEVELOPMENT ................................................................................... 2 THE SPACE SHUTTLE ERA BEGINS ....................................................................................................... 7 NASA REBOUNDS INTO SPACE ............................................................................................................ 14 FROM MIR TO THE INTERNATIONAL SPACE STATION .......................................................................... 20 STATION ASSEMBLY COMPLETED AFTER COLUMBIA ........................................................................... 25 MISSION CONTROL ROSES EXPRESS THANKS, SUPPORT .................................................................... 30 SPACE SHUTTLE PROGRAM’S KEY STATISTICS (THRU STS-134) ........................................................ 32 THE ORBITER FLEET ............................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Three Events Occurred During This Period Which Together Constitute A
    7.3 METEOROLOGICAL AND OCEANIC INSTRUMENTATION AT SPACEPORT FLORIDA – OPPORTUNITIES FOR COASTAL RESEARCH William P. Roeder, Diana L. Hajek, F. Clay Flinn, George A. Maul*, and Michael E. Fitzpatrick 45th Weather Squadron * Department of Marine and Environmental Systems Patrick Air Force Base, FL Florida Institute of Technology Melbourne, FL 1. INTRODUCTION 2.1 Complex Space Launch Weather Requirements The east central coast of Florida has a collection of Weather has a large impact on many aspects of unique and dense meteorological and oceanographic space launch, including: launch operations ground sensors. Data from these instruments are routinely processing operations in preparation for launch, post- saved and thus represent a special resource for coastal launch, various special missions, and routine 24/7 atmospheric and oceanic research. This is especially weather watch and warning responsibilities. true for thunderstorm prediction and convective During launch countdowns, the 45 WS forecasts processes, since central Florida is ‘Lightning Alley’ for and evaluates the Lightning Launch Commit Criteria the U.S. This is an area extremely rich in atmospheric (LCC) and User LCC (Hazen et al., 1995). The boundary layer interactions and subsequent Lightning LCC are a set of complex rules to avoid thunderstorm formation during the summer. Likewise, rocket-triggered lightning (Roeder et al., 1999). All US the nearby coastal waters are dynamically complex. Air Force and NASA space launches use the same The Gulf Stream flows nearby and can cause large Lightning LCC. horizontal sea-surface and vertical sea-to-air The User LCC are limits for three weather temperature gradients that vary in complex patterns categories: 1) near surface winds so the rocket can over space and time with large meteorological and safely clear the launch tower, 2) ceiling and visibility for biological impacts.
    [Show full text]
  • Exploration Systems Development
    EXPLORATION SYSTEMS DEVELOPMENT COMBINED MONTHLY REPORT August 2018 Orion: AA-2 Pre-Flight Prep Work Underway SLS: New RS-25 Test Series Begins EGS: Mobile Launcher Moves Toward EM-1 www.nasa.gov ORION 4 Orion, Meet Bridenstine 5 To the Moon, Crew! 6 AA-2 Pre-Flight Prep Work Underway 7 Successful Test Proves Important Step To Safeguard Astronauts 7 Testing Verifies Communications for Orion Missions Beyond the Moon 8 Orion Team Breezes Through the Windy City 9 New KSC Astronaut Training Experience Is Out of This World! 9 Scouts Complete First Virtual Reality Merit Badge With Orion 9 Orion’s Survival Kit for Deep Space 10 Supplier Spotlight: Taylor Devices, Inc. SPACE LAUNCH SYSTEM 12 Bridenstine: SLS Is “Key Piece Of American Architecture” 13 Administrator Wraps Up 3-Day NASA Tour At Marshall 14 Big Voice Test Shows All Systems “Go” 15 SLS on the Road: Events in Chicago 16 What’s New in SLS Social Media 17 New RS-25 Test Series Begins 17 Spaceflight Partners: Metalwerks, Inc. EXPLORATION GROUND SYSTEMS 19 Mobile Launcher Moves Toward Exploration Mission-1 20 NASA Administrator Jim Bridenstine Visits Kennedy Space Center, Tours EGS Facilities 22 Jeremy Parsons Presented Center Director’s Award 23 Navy Divers Train in the Neutral Buoyancy Laboratory at Johnson Space Center 23 Orion Crew Access Arm 2 ESD Combined Report August 2018 ORION AUGUST 2018 Orion, Meet Bridenstine NASA Administrator Jim Bridenstine made his way around different NASA Centers across the U.S. to meet employees and learn more about how each Center specifically supports NASA’s missions.
    [Show full text]
  • Crawler Transporters
    National Aeronautics and Space Administration Crawler Transporters credit to the individuals who designed the However, in September 2003, a crack was A Kennedy Space Center crawler transport- found on an original Marion shoe. In the fol- ers is the fact they did not embark on exotic lowing months, additional inspections revealed schemes that might have taken years to develop that this crack was not an isolated occurrence, and would have cost many times more. Instead, prompting the acceleration of new shoe pro- they used existing and proven concepts that curement activities. Subsequent NASA/United Facts were modified and ingeniously applied to the Space Alliance analysis revealed the existing Apollo program requirements. shoes were experiencing fatigue failures due to Construction of the crawlers as separate internal manufacturing flaws that dramatically and independent of the mobile launch platform reduced the service life of the shoes. structures proved both prudent and visionary in In December 2003, the development of light of future requirements of the transporters. more restrictive design specifications was initi- Spanning multiple programs, the crawlers have ated to prevent the manufacturing flaws found truly become the workhorses of the Complex 39 in the existing shoes. ME Global of Duluth, area. They continue to function well in the 21st Minn., was the only domestic supplier that century using the basic design initiated in 1962. proposed to manufacture all of the required NASA shoes within both the quality and schedule Crawler Transporter requirements. In mid-May 2004, ME Global Tread Belt Shoes was contracted to produce all of the required Each transporter travels on eight tracked replacement shoes pending successful qualifica- tread belts, each containing 57 tread belt tion of the company’s production process.
    [Show full text]
  • 2013 Spaceport News Summary
    2013 Spaceport News Summary The 2013 Spaceport News used the above banner for the year. Introduction The first issue of the Spaceport News was December 13, 1962. The 1963, 1964 and 1965 Spaceport News were issued weekly. The Spaceport News was issued every two weeks, starting July 7, 1966, until the last issue on February 24, 2014. Spaceport Magazine, a monthly issue, superseded the Spaceport News in April 2014, until the final issue, Jan./Feb. 2020. The two 1962 Spaceport News issues and the issues from 1996 until the final Spaceport Magazine issue, are available for viewing at this website. The Spaceport News issues from 1963 through 1995 are currently not available online. In this Summary, black font is original Spaceport News text, blue font is something I added or someone else/some other source provided, and purple font is a hot link. All links were working at the time I completed this Spaceport News Summary. The Spaceport News writer is acknowledged, if noted in the Spaceport News article. From The January 11, 2013, Spaceport News On page 2, “Kennedy's future bright with full plate for 2013”. Part of the feature, by Bob Cabana, states: “During the past year, Kennedy Space Center made great strides in transitioning from a historically government-only launch facility to an affordable, sustainable, multiuser spaceport for both government and commercial customers… We have a great future ahead, including a full plate for 2013… Coming up later this month is the launch of a TDRS satellite scheduled to lift off from Cape Canaveral Air Force Station… Page 1 We also are moving ahead with plans for NASA's Commercial Crew Program.
    [Show full text]
  • Spm May 2017
    May 2017 Vol. 4 No. 5 National Aeronautics and Space Administration KENNEDY SPACE CENTER’S magazine GOING UP CubeSats among 7,600 pounds of cargo delivered to space station on Orbital ATK's CRS-7 mission Earth Solar Aeronautics Mars Technology Right ISS System & Research Now Beyond National Aeronautics and Space Administration KENNEDY SPACE CENTER’S SPACEPORT MAGAZINE NASA’S LAUNCH CONTENTS SCHEDULE 4 �������������������CubeSats touching new heights in space research Date: No Earlier Than May 31 Mission: SpaceX CRS-11 Cargo Mission to 8 �������������������Cassini’s Kennedy legacy began 20 years ago International Space Station Description: An uncrewed SpaceX Dragon spacecraft, carrying crew supplies and 10 ����������������NASA celebrates 50th anniversary of Launch Complex 39B station hardware, will lift off on a Falcon 9 rocket from Launch Complex 39A at Kennedy Space Center. MARK PETRUZZELLO 16 ����������������Students develop robotic code in Swarmathon challenge Date: No Earlier Than June I am a field operations manager with CORE Engineering Mission: ICON & Construction Inc. (CORE), working as a contractor 23 ����������������Crawler-Transporter 2 takes test drive along crawlerway (Ionospheric Connection Explorer) Description: The Ionospheric Connection at Kennedy Space Center. My responsibilities include Explorer will study the frontier of space: the serving as the field operations manager for environmental 24 ����������������Students launch high-powered K class rocket dynamic zone high in our atmosphere where assessment and remediation projects and site Earth weather and space weather meet. ICON will launch from Kwajalein Atoll aboard superintendent for construction projects across Kennedy 27 ����������������Lunar, Martian greenhouses mimic those on Earth an Orbital ATK Pegasus. and Cape Canaveral Air Force Station, or CCAFS.
    [Show full text]