Apartment (Flat) in Deryneia, Famagusta for Sale

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Apartment (Flat) in Deryneia, Famagusta for Sale €92,000 Web Reference: #31953 Covered Area: 71m2 Bedrooms: 2 Bathrooms: 1 Toilets: 1 Parking Spaces: 1 Completion Year: 2001 Furnished Kitchen Air Condition Amathountos 32, Zana Complex, Shop 5, Ayios Tychonas, Limassol 4532, Cyprus t: +357 7000 0889 - fax: +357 25 312073 w: www.1stclass-homes.com - e: [email protected] Apartment (Flat) in Deryneia, Famagusta for Sale Amathountos 32, Zana Complex, Shop 5, Ayios Tychonas, Limassol 4532, Cyprus t: +357 7000 0889 - fax: +357 25 312073 w: www.1stclass-homes.com - e: [email protected] Apartment (Flat) in Deryneia, Famagusta for Sale Property Description A Beautiful 2 Bedroom Apartment in Deryneia, Famagusta. This 71 sqm flat is on the first floor and has a 5sqm balcony in which has access both from the living room and the master bedroom. The view from the balcony is beautiful and calm, the ideal place to have your coffee in the morning. The apartment consists of an open plan kitchen living room, 2 bedrooms, a common bathroom-toilet and is fully furnished. Additionally, is one step away from Paralimni municipality and the Kapparis area. So, the area is quiet, all the amenities are nearby, it is close to the beach and has its own private parking. What more can you ask for? Title deeds Available. Dherynia offers several facilities like monuments, landmarks and points of reference, such as Byzantine churches, Folklore Museum, Monuments Heroes, Outdoor Amphitheatre, Sports Centre, City Park, City Hall, the Cultural Centre of Occupied Famagusta. The region’s General Hospital is located in the village and the house is in the center of the village which offers short distance to all the amenities of the village. Location: Amenities: 100m Sea: 3km Public transport: 200m Protaras Marine: 5km Airport: 45km Amathountos 32, Zana Complex, Shop 5, Ayios Tychonas, Limassol 4532, Cyprus t: +357 7000 0889 - fax: +357 25 312073 w: www.1stclass-homes.com - e: [email protected].

Copy Link

Recommended publications

Famagusta Debate
BRIEFING PAPER Number 7387, 16 November 2015 By Arabella Lang Famagusta debate Inside: 1. The Famagusta dispute 2. Cyprus settlement negotiations 3. Appendix www.parliament.uk/commons-library | intranet.parliament.uk/commons-library | [email protected] | @commonslibrary Number 7387, 16 November 2015 2 Contents Summary 3 1. The Famagusta dispute 4 1.1 Backbench business debate 4 1.2 What happened to Famagusta? 4 1.3 Proposals 5 2. Cyprus settlement negotiations 6 2.1 UN negotiations 6 Recent developments 6 Up to 2014 7 2.2 Cyprus-EU relations 8 2.3 Cyprus-UK relations 10 3. Appendix 12 3.1 European Parliament declaration 12 3.2 Security Council resolutions 12 Cover page image copyright: Chamber-070 by UK Parliament image. Licensed under CC BY 2.0 / image cropped. 3 Famagusta debate Summary The House of Commons is debating a Backbench Business motion on Famagusta on 16 November 2015. It calls for the Cypriot city of Famagusta to be returned by Turkey to its ‘lawful inhabitants’. After the Turkish invasion of Cyprus in 1974, Famagusta became part of the ‘Turkish Republic of North Cyprus’ (TRNC). The TRNC operates a large free port and zone at Famagusta, although the Republic of Cyprus has declared this closed. A section of Famagusta called Varosha has remained closed off by the Turkish military since 1974, becoming a ghost town. Famagusta is often seen as one of the keys to a permanent settlement for Cyprus and to unblocking Turkey’s stalled EU accession process. UN-sponsored negotiations for a permanent settlement for Cyprus restarted in 2015 following the election of a new leader in the TRNC.
[Show full text]
Dual Naming of Sea Areas in Modern Atlases and Implications for the East Sea/Sea of Japan Case
Dual naming of sea areas in modern atlases and implications for the East Sea/Sea of Japan case Rainer DORMELS* Dual naming is, to varying extents, present in nearly all atlases. The empirical research in this paper deals with the dual naming of sea areas in about 20 atlases from different nations in the years from 2006 to 2017. Objective, quality, and size of the atlases and the country where the atlases originated from play a key role. All these characteristics of the atlases will be taken into account in the paper. In the cases of dual naming of sea areas, we can, in general, differentiate between: cases where both names are exonyms, cases where both names are endonyms, and cases where one name is an endonym, while the other is an exonym. The goal of this paper is to suggest a typology of dual names of sea areas in different atlases. As it turns out, dual names of sea areas in atlases have different functions, and in many atlases, dual naming is not a singular exception. Dual naming may help the users of atlases to orientate themselves better. Additionally, dual naming allows for providing valuable information to the users. Regarding the naming of the sea between Korea and Japan present study has achieved the following results: the East Sea/Sea of Japan is the sea area, which by far showed the most use of dual naming in the atlases examined, in all cases of dual naming two exonyms were used, even in atlases, which allow dual naming just in very few cases, the East Sea/Sea of Japan is presented with dual naming.
[Show full text]
Cyprus Tourism Organisation Offices 108 - 112
CYPRUS 10000 years of history and civilisation CONTENTS CONTENTS INTRODUCTION 5 CYPRUS 10000 years of history and civilisation 6 THE HISTORY OF CYPRUS 8200 - 1050 BC Prehistoric Age 7 1050 - 480 BC Historic Times: Geometric and Archaic Periods 8 480 BC - 330 AD Classical, Hellenistic and Roman Periods 9 330 - 1191 AD Byzantine Period 10 - 11 1192 - 1489 AD Frankish Period 12 1489 - 1571 AD The Venetians in Cyprus 13 1571 - 1878 AD Cyprus becomes part of the Ottoman Empire 14 1878 - 1960 AD British rule 15 1960 - today The Cyprus Republic, the Turkish invasion, 16 European Union entry LEFKOSIA (NICOSIA) 17 - 36 LEMESOS (LIMASSOL) 37 - 54 LARNAKA 55 - 68 PAFOS 69 - 84 AMMOCHOSTOS (FAMAGUSTA) 85 - 90 TROODOS 91 - 103 ROUTES Byzantine route, Aphrodite Cultural Route 104 - 105 MAP OF CYPRUS 106 - 107 CYPRUS TOURISM ORGANISATION OFFICES 108 - 112 3 LEFKOSIA - NICOSIA LEMESOS - LIMASSOL LARNAKA PAFOS AMMOCHOSTOS - FAMAGUSTA TROODOS 4 INTRODUCTION Cyprus is a small country with a long history and a rich culture. It is not surprising that UNESCO included the Pafos antiquities, Choirokoitia and ten of the Byzantine period churches of Troodos in its list of World Heritage Sites. The aim of this publication is to help visitors discover the cultural heritage of Cyprus. The qualified personnel at any Information Office of the Cyprus Tourism Organisation (CTO) is happy to help organise your visit in the best possible way. Parallel to answering questions and enquiries, the Cyprus Tourism Organisation provides, free of charge, a wide range of publications, maps and other information material. Additional information is available at the CTO website: www.visitcyprus.com It is an unfortunate reality that a large part of the island’s cultural heritage has since July 1974 been under Turkish occupation.
[Show full text]
1 Memorandum Ownership Status of Hotels and Other
MEMORANDUM OWNERSHIP STATUS OF HOTELS AND OTHER ACCOMODATION FACILITIES IN THE OCCUPIED PART OF THE REPUBLIC OF CYPRUS The Ministry of Foreign Affairs of the Republic of Cyprus hereby publishes a list1 of hotels situated in the Turkish occupied part of Cyprus. The majority of these hotels belong to Greek Cypriot displaced persons who were forced to leave their properties following the Turkish invasion of 1974 or have been built illegally on properties belonging to displaced Greek Cypriots, in violation of the latter’s property rights and without their consent. A number of hotels belong to Turkish Cypriots or have been built on land belonging to Turkish Cypriots. The European Court of Human Rights, in its Judgment of 18 December 1996, on the individual application of the Greek Cypriot displaced owner from Kyrenia, Mrs. Titina Loizidou, against Turkey, and in the Fourth Interstate Application of Cyprus against Turkey of 10 May 2001, upheld the rights of the refugees to their properties. In the Loizidou case, the Court ordered the Government of Turkey to compensate the applicant for the time period of deprivation of use of her property and to provide full access and allow peaceful enjoyment of her property in Kyrenia. The right of the displaced owners to their properties was reconfirmed in the decision of the European Court of Human Rights (Dec. 2005) regarding the application of Myra Xenides- Arestis v. Turkey, and has since been repeatedly reconfirmed in a multitude of cases brought by Greek Cypriot owners of property in the occupied part of Cyprus against Turkey]. It should also be reminded that, according to the United Nations Principles on Housing and Property Restitution for Refugees and Displaced Persons (the Pinheiro principles) “all refugees and displaced persons have the right to have restored to them any housing, land or property of which they were arbitrarily or unlawfully deprived..”.
[Show full text]
Agia Napa Monastery
Agia Napa Monastery 1 The monastery of Agia Napa and its namesake village are located in the Famagusta district, in southeast Cyprus. The name Napa derives from the ancient Greek word “Napi”, which means wooded valley or canyon. The word is mentioned in Homer’s Iliad, in Pindar’s Pythian Odes, and later in the Christian hymnology. In the past, there was lush vegetation in that part of the Famagusta district, whereas in the area where the village and monastery exist today there used to be an idyllic wooded valley with springs. In ancient times there was a Greek city named Thronoi in that valley, and a temple dedicated to Aphrodite. With the advent of Christianity, the city declined and all that remained eventually was ruins. However, the valley with its dense forest and plentiful water supply became popular with hunters, who converged here in search of game. When the miraculous icon of Virgin Mary was found, the word spread quickly to the neighbouring villages and the cave in that remote valley became a shrine and a sacred pilgrimage for the Orthodox Christians of the area. That icon was named “The Icon of Agia Napa”, i.e. the icon of Virgin Mary of the Forest, and the shrine was named “Agia Napa”. The area around the Monastery was uninhabited until 1790, when a group of people arrived there, having fled Thessaloniki because of an outbreak of cholera. Of that group, only Nicholas Kemitzis and his son survived. The son later married a Cypriot girl from the village of Panagia, located in the hills north of the monastery, where the water of Agia Napa flows from.
[Show full text]
“Borders/ Debordering”
“BORDERS/ DEBORDERING” number 83/84 • volume 21, 2016 EDITED BY HELENA MOTOH MAJA BJELICA POLIGRAFI Editor-in-Chief: Helena Motoh (Univ. of Primorska) Editorial Board: Lenart Škof (Univ. of Primorska), Igor Škamperle (Univ. of Ljubljana), Mojca Terčelj (Univ. of Primorska), Miha Pintarič (Univ. of Ljubljana), Rok Svetlič (Univ. of Primorska), Anja Zalta (Univ. of Ljubljana) Editorial Office: University of Primorska, Science and Research Centre, Institute for Philosophical Studies, Garibaldijeva 1, SI-6000 Koper, Slovenia Phone: +386 5 6637 700, Fax: + 386 5 6637 710, E-mail: [email protected] http://www.poligrafi.si number 83/84, volume 21 (2016) “BORDERS/DEBORDERING” TOWARDS A NEW WORLD CULTURE OF HOSPITALITY Edited by Helena Motoh and Maja Bjelica International Editorial Board: Th. Luckmann (Universität Konstanz), D. Kleinberg-Levin (Northwestern University), R. A. Mall (Universität München), M. Ježić (Filozofski fakultet, Zagreb), D. Louw (University of the Free State, Bloemfontain), M. Volf (Yale University), K. Wiredu (University of South Florida), D. Thomas (University of Birmingham), M. Kerševan (Filozofska fakulteta, Ljubljana), F. Leoncini (Università degli Studi di Venezia), P. Zovatto (Università di Trieste), T. Garfitt (Oxford University), M. Zink (Collège de France), L. Olivé (Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México), A. Louth (Durham University), P. Imbert (University of Ottawa), Ö. Turan (Middle-East Technical University, Ankara), E. Krotz (Universidad Autónoma de Yucatán / Universidad Autónoma de Metropolitana-Iztapalapa),
[Show full text]
FOURTH SECTION CASE of LORDOS and OTHERS V
FOURTH SECTION CASE OF LORDOS AND OTHERS v. TURKEY (Application no. 15973/90) JUDGMENT (merits) STRASBOURG 2 November 2010 FINAL 11/04/2011 This judgment has become final under Article 44 § 2 (c) of the Convention. It may be subject to editorial revision. LORDOS AND OTHERS v. TURKEY JUDGMENT (MERITS) 1 In the case of Lordos and Others v. Turkey, The European Court of Human Rights (Fourth Section), sitting as a Chamber composed of: Nicolas Bratza, President, Lech Garlicki, Ljiljana Mijović, David Thór Björgvinsson, Ján Šikuta, Päivi Hirvelä, Işıl Karakaş, judges, and Fatoş Aracı, Deputy Section Registrar, Having deliberated in private on 5 October 2010, Delivers the following judgment, which was adopted on that date: PROCEDURE 1. The case originated in an application (no. 15973/90) against the Republic of Turkey lodged with the European Commission of Human Rights (“the Commission”) under former Article 25 of the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms (“the Convention”) by thirteen Cypriot nationals, Mr Constantinos G. Lordos, Mr Kikis L. Christofides, Mr Zacharias Spiridonos, Mr Stavros Ioannou, Mr Areti G. Ionides, Mr Michalis Evangelides, Mr Loizos D. Loizides, Mr Christos Hadjimanolis, Mr Panayiotis Sergis, Mr Georgios Misirlis, Mr Georgios Rouvas, Mrs Eleni (alias Lenia) Antoniadou and Mr Stelios Mandrides (“the applicants”), on 20 December 1989. 2. The applicants were represented by Mr A. Demetriades, a lawyer practising in Nicosia. The Turkish Government (“the Government”) were represented by their Agent, Mr Z.M. Necatigil. 3. The applicants alleged, in particular, that the Turkish occupation of the northern part of Cyprus had deprived them of their homes and properties and that they had been the victims of discrimination on grounds of their ethnic origin and religious beliefs.
[Show full text]
693 No. 743. the EXCHANGE CONTROL LAWS, 1952 and 1954
693 No. 743. THE EXCHANGE CONTROL LAWS, 1952 AND 1954. ORDER MADE BY THE FINANCIAL SECRETARY UNDER SECTION 2 (I). In exercise of the powers vested in me by section 2 (1) of the Exchange Control Laws, 1952 and 1954 (hereinafter referred to as " the Laws "), I, the Financial Secretary, hereby order as follows :— .1. This Order may be cited as the Exchange Control (Authorized Dealers) Order, 1954. · .-...- 2. The persons specified in the Schedule hereto are hereby authorized to act for the purposes of the Laws as authorized dealers in relation to gold and foreign currency. 3. The Exchange Control (Authorized Dealers) Order, 1953, is hereby Gazette: revoked. ' Suppl. No 18.9.1953. SCHEDULE. The Ottoman Bank. Barclays Bank D.C.O. The Ionian Bank Limited. The Bank of Cyprus Limited. The Popular Bank of Limassol Limited. National Bank of Greece and Athens. The Turkish Bank of Nicosia Limited. Turkiye Is, Bankasi A.§. Made this 28th day of December, 1954. A. F. BATES, (M.P. 1100/5 I/M.) Financial Secretary'. ? EXPLANATORY NOTE. ■■, {This Note is not part of the Order, but is intended to indicate its , general purport). Ρ This Order lists the banks authorized to deal in g9ld and foreign currency and differs from the previous Order in that Turkiye ί§ Bankasi A.§. has been added to the Schedule of the Order. No. 744. THE TREE PLANTING (VILLAGE AREAS) LAW. CAP. 175. NOTIFICATION MADE UNDER SECTION 17. Lefkoniko (Famagusta) Fund. In exercise of the powers vested in me by section 17 of the Tree Planting (Village Areas) Law, I hereby establish a fund for the village of Lefkoniko in the District of Famagusta (hereinafter called the " Fund") into which shall be paid all fines recovered under the said Law for offences committed within the Tree Planting Area of the village of Lefkoniko as described in the Order of the Commissioner of Famagusta published in Supplement No.
[Show full text]
Authentisch Route 1
Zypern Authentisch Route 1 Sicherheit Autofahren in Zypern Nur Gemütliche DIGITALE Unterkünfte auf dem Land Ausgabe Tipps Nützliche Informationen Erforschen Sie den Ostteil Zyperns Agia Napa – Kap Greco – Protaras – Paralimni – Deryneia – Frenaros – Avgorou – Die Grüne Linie Entlang (Überquerung nahe Achna) – Xylotymvou – Ormideia – Xylofagou – Liopetri – Agia Napa Route 1 Agia Napa – Kap Greco – Protaras – Paralimni – Deryneia – Frenaros – Avgorou – Die Grüne Linie Entlang (Überquerung nahe Achna) – Xylotymvou – Ormideia – Xylofagou – Liopetri – Agia Napa Milia Arnadi Spathariko Pigi Santalaris Aloda Peristerona Agios Maratha M E S A O R I A Limnia Sergios Salamis Pyrga Apostolos Prastio Varnavas Stylloi Egkomi AMMOCHOSTOS BAY Gaidouras Engkomi Tumulus AMMOCHOSTOS Kouklia (FAMAGUSTA) Acheritou Kalopsida Makrasyka Deryneia Achna Dam Frenaros Paralimni Avgorou Achna Sotira Pernera Xylotymvou Neolithic Liopetri Protaras Settlement Ε4 Agia Ormideia Agia Napa Napa Potamos Xylofagou Liopetriou Cape Gkreko Cape Pyla LARNAKA BAY scale 1:300,000 0 1 2 4 6 8 10 Kilometers KERYNEIA Prepared by Lands and Surveys Department, Ministry of Interior, Kypros 2015. RLegendeeference AMMOCHOSTOS AutobahnMotorway NaturpfadeNatural Tr a(Start)ils (Start of) HauptstraßeMain Road PicknickplätzePicnic Sites NebenstraßeSeconary R oad LeuchtturmLighthous e LARNAKA EuropäischerEuropean L oFernwanderwegng distance E4 ArchäologischeArchaeologica Stättel Sites path E4 NaturpfadNatureTrail KircheChurch BezirksgrenzeDistrict Boundary KlosterMonastery SouveränerBritish
[Show full text]
S/5764 English Page 2
ORIGN?L: ENGIXSH REPORT BY THE SECRETARY-GENER;\L'IO m SECURITY COUNCIL ON THE UNITED NATIONS OPERATION IN CYPRUS, FOR THE PERIOD 26 APRIL To 8 JUNE 1964 INTRODUCTION 1. In accordance with the resolution of the Security Council of 4 March 1964 (S/5575), the United Nations Peacekeeping Force in Cyprus was assembled and placed under the command of Lt. General P.S. Gyani of India. After an initial period devoted to deployrcent, the Force became operational on 27 March 1964. The Security Council resolution states that it is the task of the Force, in the interest of international peace and security, (a) to prevent a recurrence of fighting; (b) to contribute to the maintenance and restoration of 1s.w and order; (c) to contribute to a return to norEal conditions. 2. On 11 Muy 1964, Mr. &do Plaza of Ecuador was appointed by the Secretary- General as his Special Representative in Cyprus to conduct discussiol!s and negotiations with the parties concernad towards achieving the objectives of UNFICYPrs mandate as outline& in paragraph 4 of the Secretary-General*s Report to the Security Council on 29 Jippril 1964. 3. The present report covers the period from 26 .!pril 1964 to 9 June 1964. Cn some occasions, and in order to present a more comprehensive ad clear picture, some actions during all the period of UIKFICYP*s presence in Cyprus are reported. The report comprises the following sections: I. Military Situation II. Political :$spects III. Economic, Social and Judiciary dspects IV. UNFIcYP's Progranae of Action (as set fort11 in paragraph 3 of annex I of Security Council document S/5671) V.
[Show full text]
Table of Contents
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT REPORT GROUP C – FAMAGUSTA AREA TABLE OF CONTENTS 1. INTRODUCTION ............................................................................................................................. 1 1.1. CONTRACT FOR ENGINEERING SERVICES.....................................................................................1 1.2. PURPOSE OF STUDY ...................................................................................................................2 2. INSTITUTIONAL FRAMEWORK FOR EIA............................................................................................ 3 2.1. ENVIRONMENTAL ORGANISATION IN CYPRUS...............................................................................3 2.1.1. CENTRAL GOVERNMENT LEVEL............................................................................................3 2.1.2. LOCAL LEVEL......................................................................................................................4 2.1.3. NON GOVERNMENTAL ORGANISATIONS ................................................................................5 2.2. CYPRUS NATIONAL LAW 57(I)/2001 ON EIA ................................................................................5 2.2.1. OBLIGATION FOR EIA STUDY................................................................................................5 2.2.2. CYPRUS NATIONAL LAW 57(I)/2002 ON EIA.........................................................................5 2.3. OTHER NATIONAL LAWS .............................................................................................................6
[Show full text]
S/2017/1008 Security Council
United Nations S/2017/1008 Security Council Distr.: General 28 November 2017 Original: English Strategic review of the United Nations Peacekeeping Force in Cyprus Report of the Secretary-General I. Introduction 1. The present report is submitted pursuant to Security Council resolution 2369 (2017), in which the Council requested a strategic review of the United Nations Peacekeeping Force in Cyprus (UNFICYP) focused on findings and recommendations for how UNFICYP should be optimally configured to implement its existing mandate, based exclusively on a rigorous evidence-based assessment of the impact of UNFICYP activities. 2. In line with the request of the Security Council, the review focused on an assessment of the key functions, tasks, and activities of UNFICYP, and their respective impact. At the same time, the review assessed the Force’s existing capacity and capabilities in an effort to ensure that it would be optimally configured to fulfil its mandated tasks. II. Methodology 3. The strategic review was led by an external expert, Wolfgang Weisbrod-Weber, former Special Representative of the Secretary-General for Western Sahara. Mr. Weisbrod-Weber was supported by a review team consisting of representatives from the Departments of Peacekeeping Operations, Field Support, Political Affairs and Safety and Security of the Secretariat, as well as staff of UNFICYP. 4. The UNFICYP review process was conducted in three stages. First, consultations were undertaken, at both Headquarters and UNFICYP, with relevant stakeholders, including representatives of the Greek Cypriot and Turkish Cypriot communities and of the Member States concerned, on the proposed objectives, methodology and timeline of the strategic review.
[Show full text]