Setting of Esther

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Daniel and Jeremiah Esther 610 600 590 580 570 560 550 540 530 520 510 500 490 480 470 460 450 440 430 420 410 400 Amel-marduk 561-560 Labashi-marduk 556 Xerxes II 425-424 Cambyses Nabopolassar Nebuchadnezzar 605-562 Nabonidus 556-536 Cyrus 539-530 Darius I 521-486 Xerxes I 486-465 Artaxerxes I 465-424 Darius II 423-404 625-605 529-522 Nergal-shal-usur 559-557 Belshazzar 553-539 Smerdis 522 ESTHER Sogdianus 424-423 DANIEL 12 - 8 - Dan 3 Dan Dan 2 Dan 4 Dan 7 Dan 6, 9 5, Dan 10 Dan The The statue dream, 604 Fiery furnace, c603 The tree dream, c571 Vision of four beasts, 553 Vision of ram &goat, 551 Fall of Babylon, 539 Lion’s den Reading of Jeremiah, 539 Vision of the end, 536 , 538 , Deportation, Deportation, 605 st 1 Deportation, 597 Deportation, Deportation, 587 Deportation, Sheshbazzar nd rd Letters sent from Jews at 2 3 Elephantine to Yohanan, high priest in Jerusalem, 410 and 407 Nehemiah returned to Artaxerxes, Artaxerxes, 433 Nehemiah toreturned visit of Nehemiah, Nehemiah, 432 visit of visit of Nehemiah, 445 visitof Nehemiah, return, return, led by st nd Return of Ezra, 458 of Return Ezra, 1 2 st JEREMIAH 1 Walls of 29 25 Temple Jerusalem rebuilt Jer Jer Message Message to exiles, 597 Prophecy Prophecy of captivity, 605 rebuilt, Temple foundation laid 520-516 443 Jehoiakim 609-598 HAGGAI NEHEMIAH Jehoiachin 608-597 Zedekiah 597-587 flight585 to Forced Egypt, ZECHARIAH EZRA MALACHI 44 Jer Prophecy Prophecy against refugees in Egypt Setting of Esther 540 530 520 510 500 490 480 470 460 450 440 430 478 BC 482 BC Esther 2:16 474 BC Esther 1:5-22 Esther chosen as Esther 3:7 New Year’s Festival, Queen Haman determines to Queen Vashti rejected destroy the Jews 483 BC 473 BC Esther 1:1-3 Esther 9:17 Military banquet planning Planned destruction of the war with Greece Jews turned to victory Cambyses Cyrus 539-530 Darius I 521-486 Xerxes I 486-465 Artaxerxes I 465-424 529-522 Smerdis 522 492 BC 490 BC 479 BC 466 BC First attack on Defeat at Lost battle of Lost battle of Athens failed Marathon Mycale Eurymedon , 538 , 486 BC 480 BC Rebellion of 484 BC May - leaves for Greece; Egypt Reconquest June - arrives at Hellespont; August - arrives in Therma, battle Sheshbazzar of Egypt of Thermopylae; September - Athens taken, battle of Salamis lost 445 visitof Nehemiah, st 1 Nehemiah returned to Artaxerxes, Artaxerxes, 433 Nehemiah toreturned 482 BC Nehemiah, 432 visitof return, ledreturn, by nd Return of458 Ezra, 2 st Babylon rebels 1 Walls of and destroyed Temple Jerusalem rebuilt rebuilt, Temple foundation laid 520-516 443 HAGGAI NEHEMIAH ZECHARIAH EZRA MALACHI.

Copy Link

Recommended publications

Kings & Events of the Babylonian, Persian and Greek Dynasties
KINGS AND EVENTS OF THE BABYLONIAN, PERSIAN, AND GREEK DYNASTIES 612 B.C. Nineveh falls to neo-Babylonian army (Nebuchadnezzar) 608 Pharaoh Necho II marched to Carchemesh to halt expansion of neo-Babylonian power Josiah, King of Judah, tries to stop him Death of Josiah and assumption of throne by his son, Jehoahaz Jehoiakim, another son of Josiah, replaced Jehoahaz on the authority of Pharaoh Necho II within 3 months Palestine and Syria under Egyptian rule Josiah’s reforms dissipate 605 Nabopolassar sends troops to fight remaining Assyrian army and the Egyptians at Carchemesh Nebuchadnezzar chased them all the way to the plains of Palestine Nebuchadnezzar got word of the death of his father (Nabopolassar) so he returned to Babylon to receive the crown On the way back he takes Daniel and other members of the royal family into exile 605 - 538 Babylon in control of Palestine, 597; 10,000 exiled to Babylon 586 Jerusalem and the temple destroyed and large deportation 582 Because Jewish guerilla fighters killed Gedaliah another last large deportation occurred SUCCESSORS OF NEBUCHADNEZZAR 562 - 560 Evil-Merodach released Jehoiakim (true Messianic line) from custody 560 - 556 Neriglissar 556 Labaski-Marduk reigned 556 - 539 Nabonidus: Spent most of the time building a temple to the mood god, Sin. This earned enmity of the priests of Marduk. Spent the rest of his time trying to put down revolts and stabilize the kingdom. He moved to Tema and left the affairs of state to his son, Belshazzar Belshazzar: Spent most of his time trying to restore order. Babylonia’s great threat was Media.
[Show full text]
Ancient Persia: a Concise History of the Achaemenid Empire, 550-330 Bce Pdf, Epub, Ebook
ANCIENT PERSIA: A CONCISE HISTORY OF THE ACHAEMENID EMPIRE, 550-330 BCE PDF, EPUB, EBOOK Matt Waters | 274 pages | 20 Jan 2014 | CAMBRIDGE UNIVERSITY PRESS | 9780521253697 | English | Cambridge, United Kingdom Ancient Persia: A Concise History of the Achaemenid Empire, 550-330 BCE PDF Book The Achaemenid Empire takes its name from Achaemenes, the eponymous founder of the dynasty. The history of ancient Iran stretches back millennia. A clear and enjoyable primer on the Persian empire. The Murashu archive helps us understand how military obligations were fulfilled. Jewish exiles from Babylonia returned to Jerusalem and rebuilt the temple that had been sacked by the Babylonian king NebuchadnezzarII in Apr 16, Michael Cayley rated it liked it Shelves: history. Parsa, more specifically equivalent with modern Fars, is dominated by the southern part of the Zagros Mountains — a chain running northwest to southeast across western Iran — save for the coastal region along the Persian Gulf and the low- lying plains of Khuzistan, wherein is found the ancient city of Susa. Xerxes, the expander of the realm 8. Get A Copy. The former could be granted as long as it did not contravene the latter. Moving eastward beyond the Zagros one encounters the Iranian Plateau and the forbidding salt deserts of central Iran. Some scholars have ingeniously reconciled joint Athenian and Persian claims on much of western Anatolia by assuming that the city-states in question paid tribute not only to Athens — which is attested to varying degrees through the latter half of the fifth century — but also to the Persian satrap. This is not only filial piety but such works were expected of any king.
[Show full text]
Alexander and the 'Defeat' of the Sogdianian Revolt
Alexander the Great and the “Defeat” of the Sogdianian Revolt* Salvatore Vacante “A victory is twice itself when the achiever brings home full numbers” (W. Shakespeare, Much Ado About Nothing, Act I, Scene I) (i) At the beginning of 329,1 the flight of the satrap Bessus towards the northeastern borders of the former Persian Empire gave Alexander the Great the timely opportunity for the invasion of Sogdiana.2 This ancient region was located between the Oxus (present Amu-Darya) and Iaxartes (Syr-Darya) Rivers, where we now find the modern Uzbekistan and Tajikistan, bordering on the South with ancient Bactria (present Afghanistan). According to literary sources, the Macedonians rapidly occupied this large area with its “capital” Maracanda3 and also built, along the Iaxartes, the famous Alexandria Eschate, “the Farthermost.”4 However, during the same year, the Sogdianian nobles Spitamenes and Catanes5 were able to create a coalition of Sogdianians, Bactrians and Scythians, who created serious problems for Macedonian power in the region, forcing Alexander to return for the winter of 329/8 to the largest city of Bactria, Zariaspa-Bactra.6 The chiefs of the revolt were those who had *An earlier version of this paper was presented at the Conflict Archaeology Postgraduate Conference organized by the Centre for Battlefield Archaeology of the University of Glasgow on October 7th – 9th 2011. 1 Except where differently indicated, all the dates are BCE. 2 Arr. 3.28.10-29.6. 3 Arr. 3.30.6; Curt. 7.6.10: modern Samarkand. According to Curtius, the city was surrounded by long walls (70 stades, i.e.
[Show full text]
Holy Bible 1 1:1 536 »
1 1 12 25 Holy_bible_1 536 1:1 1 » 2 « 77 12 25 599 11 » 12 13 14 « 17 13 24 2 12 11 » 13 14 15 16 17 « 2 539 1 609 3 536 1 606 8 527 9 597 5 517 4 587 7 515 6 585 586 586 10 537 11 467 12 457 8 527 457 1 Nebuchadnezzar II Listen (help·info) (c 634 – 562 BC) was a ruler of Babylon in the Chaldean Dynasty, who reigned c. 605 BC – 562 BC. According to the Bible, he conquered Judah and Jerusalem, and sent the Jews into exile. He is credited with the construction of the Hanging Gardens of Babylon. He is featured in the Book of Daniel and is also mentioned in several other books of the Bible. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nebuchadrezzar_II 2 The Battle of Opis, fought in September 539 BC, was a major engagement between the armies of Persia under Cyrus the Great and the Neo-Babylonian Empire under Nabonidus during the Persian invasion of Mesopotamia. At the time, Babylonia was the last major power in western Asia that was not yet under Persian control. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Battle_of_Opis 1 45 3 http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cyrus_II_the_Great The accession of Cyrus the Great of Persia in 538 BCE made the re- establishment of a Jewish http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Second_Temple 1 24 2 4 587 BC—Jerusalem falls to the Babylonians, ending the Kingdom of Judah. The http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/587_BC 519 517 5 http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Achaemenid_Empire 6 The First Temple was destroyed by the Babylonians in 586 BC when they sacked the city.
[Show full text]
Hans Van Wees, University College London THUCYDIDES on EARLY
1 Hans van Wees, University College London THUCYDIDES ON EARLY GREEK HISTORY The introduction to Thucydides’ history was wrong-headed and stylistically inept, according to the historian and literary critic Dionysius of Halicarnassus. This ‘proem’ would have been much better, he thought, if Thucydides had not ‘stretched it out to 500 lines’ but skipped straight from chapter 1 to chapter 21. So convinced was Dionysius that he proceeded to quote the whole of the remaining introductory text to show how well it read without the padding (On Thucydides 19-20). No modern reader will agree: the text that our critic wanted to edit out, a sweeping history of Greece known as ‘the Archaeology’ (archaiologia, ‘account of ancient times’), is now universally regarded as a landmark of historical analysis. But Dionysius did have a point: a more conventional introduction along the lines he preferred could have worked perfectly well. Thucydides could have begun with his claim that the Peloponnesian War was the ‘greatest’ war ever fought (1.1.1-2), addressed the difficulty of finding reliable evidence (1.1.3, 1.21-22), and concluded that the Peloponnesian War was the greatest war because it lasted much longer than the previous greatest conflict, the Persian War, and involved ‘sufferings’ (pathēmata) greater than ever before in the same span of time (1.23.1-3). Notable ‘sufferings’ were certainly an important feature of Thucydides’ narrative, dramatically evoked, carefully analysed, or both, as in the case of civil war and plague (see Ch. 1, this volume). So what need was there to insert a long account of early Greece? The purpose of the Archaeology is to introduce another dimension of Thucydides’ history: the analysis of power.
[Show full text]
Or Politics Matters the Book of Esther
1 Esther is not Yester… or Politics Matters The Book of Esther: A New Interpretation Robert Case Faith Presbyterian Church, Tacoma, WA 2017 Introduction “Lawrence of Arabia Overture” “Lawrence of Arabia Overture” was writing in l962 by Maurice Jarre for the Oscar winning movie, Lawrence of Arabia starring: Peter O'Toole, Anthony Quinn, Omar Shariff, Alec Guiness, Anthony Quail, Jack Hawkins and directed By David Lean. Considered by some critics to be the greatest movie ever made, The movie is a 1962 epic historical drama film based on the life of T. E. Lawrence. The film was nominated for ten Oscars in 1963; it won seven. The film depicts Lawrence's experiences in the Arabian Peninsula during World War I, in particular his attacks on Aqaba and Damascus and his involvement in the Arab National Council. Its themes include Lawrence's emotional struggles with the personal violence inherent in war, his own identity, and his divided allegiance between his native Britain and its army and his new-found comrades within the Arabian desert tribes. In 1991, Lawrence of Arabia was deemed "culturally, historically, or aesthetically significant" and selected for preservation in the United States Library of Congress National Film Registry. The overture is played by the London Philharmonic Orchestra. Maurice Jarre wrote all the music for Lawrence and won his first Oscar. His second collaboration with David Lean on Doctor Zhivago in 1965 earned him another Oscar. He collaborated with Lean again on Ryan's Daughter in 1970 and A Passage to India in 1984 for which he received his third Academy Award.
[Show full text]
Cyrus the Younger and Artaxerxes II, 401 BC: an Achaemenid Civil War Reconsidered
chapter 7 Cyrus the Younger and Artaxerxes II, 401 BC: An Achaemenid Civil War Reconsidered John W. I. Lee Cyrus the Younger’s attempt in 401 BC to wrest the Achaemenid throne from his older brother King Artaxerxes II ranks among the pivotal moments of ancient West Asian history.1 The story really begins with the death of Cyrus’ and Artaxerxes’ grandfather Artaxerxes I (465–424). Artaxerxes I’s son and chosen successor Xerxes II faced immediate opposition from two half-brothers, Sogdianus and Ochus. Sogdianus assassinated Xerxes and seized power while Ochus raised an army to challenge Sogdianus. With the support of high-ranking Persians including Sogdianus’ own cavalry commander Arbarius and Arshama the satrap of Egypt, Ochus won out, ruling as Darius II from 424/3 to 405/4.2 Darius II and his wife Parysatis had many children, the eldest being Arses (born before 424) and his younger brother Cyrus, who was born after Darius became king. Darius prepared Arses as his successor while sending Cyrus west to Anatolia in 407 BC to oversee imperial responses to the ongoing Peloponnesian War between Athens and Sparta. When Darius II died in late 405 or early 404, Arses took the throne as Artaxerxes II. The new king arrested Cyrus on charges of plotting against him but their mother Parysatis intervened, enabling Cyrus to return to his base at Sardis.3 With Artaxerxes distracted by revolt in Egypt and possibly elsewhere, Cyrus secretly built up strength for an attempt on the throne. Early in 401 BC, hav- ing assembled perhaps 40,000 troops including some 12,000 mostly Greek mercenaries, Cyrus set out from Sardis under the pretext of punishing rebels 1 This chapter forms part of a larger project on civil war and revolt in Achaemenid Persia.
[Show full text]
ARTAXERXES III OCHUS and His Reign
't\ Class __lil^^-^^ Book_ —A\^ Gopyrightl^"._- COPYRIGHT DEPOSIT. ARTAXERXES III OCHUS AND His Reign WITH SPECIAL CONSIDERATION OF THE OLD TESTAMENT SOURCES BEARING UPON THE PERIOD ^, AN INAUGURAL DISSERTATION SUBMITTED TO THE PHILOSOPHICAL FACULTY OF THE UNIVERSITY OP BERN IN CANDIDACY FOR THE DOCTOR'S DEGREE BY NOAH CALVIN HIRSCHY OP BERNE, INDIANA ACCEPTED BY THE PHILOSOPHICAL FACULTY UPON THE PROPOSAL OF PROFESSOR DR. K. MARTI PROFESSOR DR. G. TOBLER BERN DEAN JULY 16. 1907 CHICAGO THE UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO PRESS 1909 Copyright igog By The University of Chicago Published May igog Composed and Printed By The University of Chicago Press Chicago, Illinois, U. S. A. LIBRARY Of CONGRESS! Two Copies Received I my ! 9 1809 ( iC'-OiiS lA ^AC. ,'.0. PREFACE In this attempt to gather all the historic data of a dark and weary period of the world's history on which the sources of information are rather indefinite and unsatisfactory, it may at first appear that too much attention is paid to the general historic situation. But when we remember that some of the biblical sources claimed for the reign of Ochus are placed by scholars at different periods from the eighth to the first century, then this objection loses its force. The final solution of the acceptance or rejection of the Old Testament sources for this period seems to the writer to depend very largely on the clearness of our conception of the history of the last seven centuries before the Christian era. The reign of Ochus forms only a fragment of the two and a fourth centuries of Persian suprem- acy.
[Show full text]
Basil I's Genealogy and Byzantine Historical Memory of The
Artaxerxes in Constantinople: Basil I’s Genealogy and Byzantine Historical Memory of the Achaemenid Persians Nathan Leidholm HE EMPIRE FOUNDED by Cyrus the Great in 550 BCE proved to be exceptionally long-lasting in its impact on T subsequent polities throughout much of the ancient and medieval world. The memory of ancient Persia and its mean- ing were constantly made and re-made for centuries from Western Europe to India and beyond. Its impact was so great that modern scholars have even coined a term to describe it: ‘Persianism’. Rolf Strootman and Miguel John Versluys have recently collected a number of essays dedicated to the concept, which is designed to encapsulate “the ideas and associations revolving around [Achaemenid] Persia and appropriated in specific contexts for specific (socio-cultural or political) rea- sons.”1 The empire encouraged and accommodated a wide range of ideological purposes across several linguistic, religious, and political communities from antiquity to the present. In- deed, Garth Fowden once described large portions of antiquity as “living in the shadow of Cyrus.”2 Yet the medieval Roman Empire, Byzantium, has been largely absent from these discus- sions. The Byzantines maintained a knowledge of and interest in 1 R. Strootman and M. John Versluys, “From Culture to Concept: The Reception and Appropriation of Persia in Antiquity,” in Persianism in An- tiquity (Stuttgart 2017) 9. 2 G. Fowden, Empire to Commonwealth: Consequences of Monotheism in Late An- tiquity (Princeton 1993) 3–4. ————— Greek, Roman, and Byzantine Studies 60 (2020) 444–471 Article copyright held by the author(s) and made available under the Creative Commons Attribution License CC-BY https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ NATHAN LEIDHOLM 445 the Persian past throughout the empire’s history, employing and drawing from this past in ways that went beyond simple antiquarianism.
[Show full text]
Background & Overview
Background & Overview AUTHOR: It doesn’t explicitly say & we can’t be certain but tradition links MORDECAI to the book. • Josephus tells us that Mordecai was the writer • Other possible candidate: Nehemiah (see below) or Ezra (Augustine suggested him) o He served Artaxerxes (465-424), the successor of Xerxes (486-464) o He could’ve Known of the events in Esther (especially Purim) either through living them or hearing about them by his parents o Nehemiah would’ve had access to the royal archives and been an educated man BACKGROUND: Esther’s family would have been one of the many Israelite families NOT to return to Israel choosing instead to remain in Persia. In the city of Susa. The 1st group of Jews returns ~536 BC. • The Persian empire was expansive – from Europe’s Balkan peninsula to India. DATE OF WRITING: I’d say mid to late 5th C (~464-415) (took place in the time of King Xerxes before that) PURPOSE OF WRITING: Historical account of God’s preservation of His people even as they are in a distant land (God’s providence extends beyond all boundary and circumstance.) Which leads to the themes… Providence (God’s) – The foreseeing and guardianship of God MAJOR THEMES FOR US TO KEEP BEFORE US: over His creatures...a manifestation of His divine care or direction. 1.) God’s deliverance (in hardship). 2.) Man’s courage/obedience in the face of intense trial 3.) How to respond in scary, difficult & uncertain times. 4.) The providence of God! BIBLE TIMELINE: Assyrians Babylonians (~722 BC) (~586 BC) United Divided Into exile Return to Creation Abraham Moses Judges Israel Israel Israel Judah the land Christ ESTHER Middle East Power Player Nebuchadnezzar Alexander the Great Assyrians // Babylonians // Medes/Persians // Greeks // Romans (967-664) (625-539) (550-330) (334-308) (330- ) ** During the book of Esther, the Medes/Persians were the world power of the day… Persian Kings: Reign(ish): Important biblical event: Cyrus II “the Great” ========> 550-529 ====> Jews to return & rebuild temple (Ezra 1-4:5; 2 Chron.
[Show full text]
Brief Flow of History
Brief Flow of History (The following is a very brief flow of history from the second beast—the bear—Medo- Persian Empire to the end of the third beast – the leopard – Greece; it is taken from various historical accounts—it is designed to give the Spirit Filled believer who desires to see how The Four Winds burst forth on the Great Sea.) We will start off with the point that the great Persian Empire desired to conquer into Europe. This is where the next two beast were already forming—Greece and Rome. KINGS OF PERSIA Achaemenes; Teispes, the Great King, King of Anshan; Cyrus I; Cambyses I, married Mandane, daughter of Astyages of Media; Cyrus II (549–530 B.C.), known as Cyrus the Great, King of Anshan and King of Persia; started returning Jews back to Jerusalem Cambyses II (529–522); conquered Egypt; Pseudo-Smerdis (Gautama), usurper (522–521); Darius I (521–486), known as Darius Hystaspes or Darius the Great; Had the temple rebuilt in Jerusalem. Xerxes I (486–465), the Ahasuerus of the book of Esther; During his reign the prophets Zechariah, Haggai, are active Artaxerxes II (465–424), also known as Artaxerxes Longimanus (Ezra 7:1– 8; Neh. 2:1); Sent Nehemiah back to rebuild the city of Jerusalem. 2013-07-14 Sunday Message ”A Brief Flow of History” Page 1 Xerxes II (424); Darius II (423–404); Malachi –last book of OT written 435-415 Artaxerxes II (404–359); Jerusalem completed in 396 bc Artaxerxes III (359–338); Arses (338–335); Darius III (335–331), last Persian king defeated by Alexander the Great From this time on we have the inter-testament period, no more prophets until the incarnation.
[Show full text]
Orientalism, Postcolonialism, and the Achaemenid Empire: Meditations on Bruce Lincoln’S Religion, Empire, and Torture1
ORIENTALISM, POSTCOLONIALISM, AND THE ACHAEMENID EMPIRE: MEDITATIONS ON BRUCE 1 LINCOLN’S RELIGION, EMPIRE, AND TORTURE HENRY P. COLBURN Benedetto Croce’s dictum that all history is contemporary history is nowhere better exemplified than in Bruce Lincoln’s 2007 book, Religion, empire, and torture: the case of Achaemenian Persia, with a postscript on Abu Ghraib. This book, despite its foregrounding of an ancient empire, is by Lincoln’s own admission the product of his ‘anguish and outrage concerning the American imperial adventure in Iraq’.2 But rather than criticizing American actions directly, he does so through an extended case study of the Achaemenid Persian Empire. Though Lincoln’s main thesis merits much consideration, this case study is the focus of the present paper, because of the severe methodological flaws that inform it, and their potentially insidious consequences. Indeed, their insidiousness is made all the more worrisome because of the book’s largely uncritical reception. The ten Anglophone reviews known to me appear in a wide range of scholarly journals, many serving academic specialties far outside of classics, ancient history, and Near Eastern studies, and only two of them even recognize some of the methodological issues.3 Even more troubling, this book was the recipient of the 2007 Frank Moore Cross Award given by the American Schools of Oriental Research.4 This organization’s endorsement of such a misinformed and biased study demonstrates that despite the efforts of scholars in the field of Achaemenid studies, outdated and inappropriate ideas about the empire still persist among well informed and well meaning scholars of antiquity.
[Show full text]