DOCSLIB.ORG

Which Canadian Registered Charities Spent Money on “Political Activities” and How Much Did They Spend in 2012?

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Which Canadian Registered Charities Spent Money on “Political Activities” and How Much Did They Spend in 2012? www.globalphilanthropy.ca Which Canadian Registered Charities Spent Money on “political activities” and how much did they spend in 2012? By Mark Blumberg (September 6, 2014) We recently reviewed the T3010 information for 2012. The database was prepared by the Charities Directorate of CRA in June 2014 and covers about 85,477 charities which is almost all of the 2012 T3010 returns. Canadian registered charities were required to disclose on the 2012 T3010 “Did the Charity Carry on Political Activities During the Fiscal Year?” (line 2400) and “Enter the Total Amount spent by the Charity on these activities” (line 5000) Please review my caveats at the end about the reliability and usage of T3010 information. Also we have prepared a detailed article which discusses the unreliability of answers to the political questions on the T3010 entitled How accurate are the T3010 charity returns when it comes to political activities?: http://www.canadiancharitylaw.ca/index.php/blog/comments/how_accurate_are_the_t3010_registered_charity_information_returns/ Here is a list of Canadian registered charities that identified they carry on political activities with their legal name, the province that the charity is based in, whether they carried on political activities, the total amount spent by the charity on political activities, the total amount spent on charitable/admin/fundraising and total expenditures. The total amount declared by charities on their T3010 that they spent on political activities is approximately $21,983,000. Therefore, it is just shy of $22 million. To put that in perspective the charity sector spent over $220 billion in 2012 and for every $1,000 it spent on charitable activities it spent $1 on political activities. 1 www.globalphilanthropy.ca Here are some articles that we have written over the last couple of years dealing with Canadian charities and political activities that may provide some context: Focus by media on CRA political activity audits - some preliminary thoughts New blog on Political Activities and Canadian charities Andrew Coyne: “Problem with charities isn’t their politics, it’s their generous tax credit” Partial Glimpse at 2013 T3010 Filings Dealing with Political Activities by Canadian Charities Charity Commission forces “environmental” charity to set up campaigning arm Further T3010 descriptions of political activities by Canadian registered charities Political activities self-assessment tool CRA releases new T3010 (13) for registered charities with fiscal year ends after January 1, 2013 CRA updates Guidance on Political Activities for Canadian registered charities (CPS-022) Which Canadian Charities Spent Money on “political activities” and how much did they spend (2011) How accurate are the T3010 charity returns when it comes to political activities? 2 www.globalphilanthropy.ca Political Canadian Charity Provin Activities Charitable Management Total # City ce Y/N Political Total Revenue Programs and Admin Fundraising Expenditures DUCKS UNLIMITED 1. CANADA/CANARDS ILLIMITES STONE CANADA WALL MB Y $3,514,417.00 $88,780,855.00 $65,630,849.00 $1,763,467.00 $16,932,615.00 $87,841,348.00 WORLD VISION CANADA-VISION MISSISS 2. MONDIALE CANADA AUGA ON Y $1,987,929.00 $399,402,571.00 $319,400,511.00 $20,533,728.00 $54,827,710.00 $400,203,813.00 MULTIPLE SCLEROSIS SOCIETY OF 3. CANADA / SOCIÉTÉ CANADIENNE DE TORONT LA SCLÉROSE EN PLAQUES O ON Y $1,567,584.00 $52,306,856.00 $26,071,025.00 $3,497,759.00 $20,533,335.00 $51,669,703.00 TORONT 4. THE UNITED CHURCH OF CANADA O ON Y $918,450.00 $41,558,000.00 $36,505,433.00 $4,060,962.00 $1,943,968.00 $53,207,000.00 UNITED ISRAEL APPEAL OF CANADA TORONT 5. INC O ON Y $910,570.00 $50,780,016.00 $51,132,887.00 $5,100,762.00 $652,373.00 $57,947,579.00 CANADIAN CANCER SOCIETY / MONTR 6. SOCIÉTÉ CANADIENNE DU CANCER EAL QC Y $865,613.00 $31,762,158.00 $13,643,457.00 $837,592.00 $9,736,994.00 $31,727,902.00 CANADIAN CANCER SOCIETY / TORONT 7. SOCIÉTÉ CANADIENNE DU CANCER O ON Y $840,868.00 $61,264,412.00 $43,306,565.00 $1,772,552.00 $2,722,395.00 $60,128,001.00 ASSOCIATION OF UNIVERSITIES & OTTAW 8. COLLEGES OF CANADA A ON Y $671,300.00 $34,635,100.00 $31,032,400.00 $2,351,200.00 $34,489,100.00 FEDERATION OF CANADIAN 9. MUNICIPALITIES - FEDERATION OTTAW CANADIENNE DES MUNICIPALITES A ON Y $667,400.00 $39,370,000.00 $3,243,900.00 $25,024,700.00 Organisation Catholique Canadienne MONTR 10. pour le Développement et la Paix EAL QC Y $561,108.00 $27,099,787.00 $18,376,304.00 $4,707,354.00 $552,238.00 $29,097,045.00 CANADIAN CANCER SOCIETY / VANCO 11. SOCIÉTÉ CANADIENNE DU CANCER UVER BC Y $425,691.00 $39,124,328.00 $14,764,207.00 $1,561,743.00 $10,408,429.00 $30,992,071.00 CANADIAN CANCER SOCIETY / 12. SOCIÉTÉ CANADIENNE DU CANCER HALIFAX NS Y $421,922.00 $9,326,203.00 $2,248,318.00 $548,802.00 $2,420,798.00 $6,375,840.00 3 www.globalphilanthropy.ca CANADIAN CANCER SOCIETY / SAINT 13. SOCIÉTÉ CANADIENNE DU CANCER JOHN NB Y $362,024.00 $5,916,737.00 $2,483,061.00 $364,646.00 $1,897,452.00 $5,870,218.00 CANADIAN CANCER SOCIETY / CALGAR 14. SOCIÉTÉ CANADIENNE DU CANCER Y AB Y $293,970.00 $18,858,322.00 $5,402,056.00 $489,553.00 $10,018,873.00 $18,223,952.00 THE ASSOCIATION OF FACULTIES OF MEDICINE OF CANADA / 15. L'ASSOCIATION DES FACULTES DE OTTAW MEDECINE DU CANADA A ON Y $279,433.00 $4,233,195.00 $3,385,959.00 $567,057.00 $4,232,449.00 TORONT 16. FAMILY SERVICE TORONTO O ON Y $266,249.00 $21,151,318.00 $18,631,514.00 $2,131,136.00 $16,006.00 $21,044,906.00 The Canadian National Institute For 17. The Blind - L'Institut national TORONT canadien pour les aveugles O ON Y $256,880.00 $84,919,350.00 $56,835,922.00 $2,427,748.00 $13,407,341.00 $81,652,482.00 ENVIRONMENTAL DEFENCE CANADA TORONT 18. INC. O ON Y $251,985.00 $3,608,893.00 $2,213,312.00 $417,089.00 $632,417.00 $3,516,303.00 CANADIAN FOODGRAINS BANK ASSOCIATION INC/ASSOCIATION DE 19. LA BANQUE CANADIENNE DE WINNIP GRAINS INC. EG MB Y $246,688.00 $44,236,149.00 $21,592,123.00 $2,107,117.00 $825,686.00 $39,521,216.00 VANCO 20. TIDES CANADA INITIATIVES SOCIETY UVER BC Y $238,073.00 $13,233,462.00 $13,487,420.00 $559,820.00 $122,865.00 $14,586,693.00 PARKINSON SOCIETY 21. CANADA/SOCIETE PARKINSON TORONT CANADA O ON Y $236,423.00 $9,397,630.00 $3,723,842.00 $1,146,565.00 $2,277,783.00 $8,617,600.00 CANADIAN CANCER SOCIETY / TORONT 22. SOCIÉTÉ CANADIENNE DU CANCER O ON Y $218,000.00 $100,340,000.00 $34,308,000.00 $3,207,000.00 $41,153,000.00 $102,498,000.00 VANCO 23. THE DAVID SUZUKI FOUNDATION UVER BC Y $210,917.00 $9,282,164.00 $6,120,036.00 $520,366.00 $1,918,936.00 $8,770,255.00 VANCO 24. ALZHEIMER SOCIETY OF B.C. UVER BC Y $207,710.00 $7,014,542.00 $3,579,986.00 $591,440.00 $889,234.00 $5,928,119.00 ALZHEIMER SOCIETY OF CANADA - TORONT 25. SOCIETE ALZHEIMER DU CANADA O ON Y $195,419.00 $18,294,695.00 $6,564,047.00 $513,243.00 $3,997,542.00 $19,211,153.00 4 www.globalphilanthropy.ca OTTAW 26. OXFAM CANADA A ON Y $194,969.00 $31,668,163.00 $26,844,065.00 $2,485,408.00 $2,597,782.00 $32,122,224.00 FORT THE FORT MCMURRAY CATHOLIC 27. MCMUR BOARD OF EDUCATION RAY AB Y $193,987.00 $65,411,155.00 $63,343,745.00 $2,209,155.00 $65,746,887.00 THE GEORGE CEDRIC METCALF TORONT 28. CHARITABLE FOUNDATION O ON Y $180,000.00 $6,660,881.00 $884,707.00 $968,232.00 $6,027,630.00 VANCO 29. VANCOUVER FOUNDATION UVER BC Y $171,260.00 $121,557,880.00 $4,923,998.00 $1,514,191.00 $55,622,539.00 MONTR 30. Fédération de l'Âge d'Or du Québec ÉAL QC Y $161,803.00 $4,048,993.00 $1,753,806.00 $856,181.00 $465,792.00 $4,125,357.00 MENNONITE CENTRAL COMMITTEE WINNIP 31. CANADA EG MB Y $142,662.00 $31,617,445.00 $29,116,971.00 $906,469.00 $324,738.00 $30,595,632.00 WORLD WILDLIFE FUND CANADA 32. FONDS MONDIAL POUR LA NATURE TORONT CAN ADA O ON Y $142,539.00 $23,495,250.00 $17,207,143.00 $963,842.00 $5,510,670.00 $24,441,548.00 WINNIP 33. MENNONITE CHURCH CANADA EG MB Y $131,652.00 $4,987,372.00 $3,229,091.00 $911,867.00 $162,720.00 $5,037,466.00 THE CHRISTIAN REFORMED CHURCH 34. IN NORTH AMERICA-CANADA BURLIN CORPORATION GTON ON Y $126,270.00 $6,219,813.00 $4,448,055.00 $347,185.00 $79,136.00 $6,829,829.00 ENGINEERS WITHOUT BORDERS (CANADA) 35.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • 2018 02 22 REVISED Regional Council Agenda
    CHAIR: F. DALE MEMBERS: G. CARLSON B. CROMBIE J. DOWNEY C. FONSECA The Council of the G. GIBSON A. GROVES Regional Municipality of Peel N. IANNICCA J. INNIS REVISED AGENDA L. JEFFREY Date: Thursday, February 22, 2018 J. KOVAC M. MAHONEY Time: 9:30 AM S. MCFADDEN th M. MEDEIROS Place: Council Chamber, 5 Floor G. MILES Regional Administrative Headquarters E. MOORE 10 Peel Centre Drive, Suite A M. PALLESCHI C. PARRISH Brampton, Ontario K. RAS P. SAITO B. SHAUGHNESSY For inquiries about this agenda or to make arrangements for accessibility J. SPROVIERI accommodations including alternate formats, please contact: R. STARR Christine Thomson at (905) 791-7800, ext. 4582 or at A. THOMPSON [email protected]. Agendas and reports are available at www.peelregion.ca/council Region of Peel Council Agenda Thursday, February 22, 2018 1. ROLL CALL 2. DECLARATIONS OF CONFLICTS OF INTEREST 3. APPROVAL OF MINUTES 3.1. February 8, 2018 Regional Council meeting 4. APPROVAL OF AGENDA 5. PUBLIC ANNOUNCEMENTS SPONSORED BY A MEMBER OF COUNCIL 6. DELEGATIONS 6.1. Jim Faught, Communications Director; Tom O'Callaghan, Deputy Project Director and Commercial Manager; Aitor Arbesu, Design Build Director; and Vicente Valencia, Chief Executive Officer, LINK427, Presenting the Highway 427 Expansion Project (See also Items Related to Public Works – Item 10.1) 6.2. Amanjot Singh, Senior Engineer, Water and Climate Change Science, Credit Valley Conservation Authority, Presenting the Impacts of Road Salt on Water Bodies 7. CONSENT AGENDA All items listed with an asterisk (*) are considered to be routine and non-controversial by Council and will be approved by one resolution.
    [Show full text]
  • A Developmental Evaluation Primer
    A Developmental Evaluation Primer Jamie A.A. Gamble The J.W. McConnell Family Foundation About the Foundation Established in 1937 by philanthropist and entrepreneur John Wilson McConnell, The J.W. McConnell Family Foundation funds projects in Canada that foster citizen engagement, build resilient communities and have the potential for national scale or impact. A Developmental Evaluation Primer Jamie A.A. Gamble Our vision at The J.W. McConnell Family Foundation is a Canada where all people have the opportunity to develop their potential and contribute to the betterment of their communities and country. Over the years, the ways to achieve this have evolved; what remains central to its purpose is the importance of community, how people contribute, and the Foundation's need to make choices in its granting decisions, to take risks, to learn and to be engaged with its grantees. In the process of developing and supporting programs, the Foundation has come to appreciate better the importance of innovation, the exploring of new and effective ways of addressing intractable social problems, and the challenge of ensuring that these new approaches are sustained. The J.W. McConnell Family Foundation A Developmental Evaluation Primer The J.W. McConnell Family Foundation Table of contents Foreword 4 Sponsors of the Developmental Evaluation Workshops 7 1 Introduction to Developmental Evaluation 10 1.1 What is Developmental Evaluation? 12 1.2 Myths about Developmental Evaluation 21 1.3 Assessing Conditions for DE 25 2 Applying Developmental Evaluation 29 2.1 Who is the Developmental Evaluator? 36 2.2 Skills of the Developmental Evaluator 40 2.3 DE Tools 46 2.4 Issues and Challenges 53 2.5 Future Potential: Directions for DE 57 About the Author 59 Appendix A: Comparing DE to Traditional Evaluation 61 Appendix B: Participating Organizations 63 The J.W.
    [Show full text]
  • Advocacy on the Agenda: Preparing Voluntary Boards for Public Policy
    Advocacy on the Agenda: Preparing voluntary boards for public policy participation Acknowledgements Volunteer Canada gratefully acknowledges the author, Annette Hegel, as well as the writing and editing contributions of the following people: Paddy Bowen, Volunteer Canada Louise Chatterton Luchuk Liz Weaver, Volunteer Hamilton We also wish to thank United Way of Canada-Centraide Canada for their collaborative contribution and the following members of the Advisory Committee for their valuable work on this project: Noella Beausoleil, United Way of Canada-Centraide Canada Bruce Burrows, Railway Association of Canada Dr. Janice Forsyth, United Way of Windsor-Essex Maryann Istiloglu, Parkinson Society Canada Ruth MacKenzie, Volunteer Canada Allan Rix, Centre for Voluntary Sector Research and Development Penelope Rowe, Community Services Council of Newfoundland Kathryn Tregunna, Canadian Healthcare Association The Social Development Partnerships Program of Human Resources Development Canada is pleased to have provided financial support to this project. The views expressed in this publication do not necessarily reflect those of Human Resources Development Canada. Aussi disponibles en français. Please note: This document has been translated into French but does not reflect the distinct characteristics of québécois policies and public policy development. This is a literal translation and is not to be considered as a socio-political interpretation. ISBN 0-9733191-2-7 © Volunteer Canada, 2003 Table of Contents Making the case for public policy involvement . .3 The boards’ role in advocacy and policy making . .5 Benefits to society and the organization . .7 Civic participation . .7 Capacity building . .7 Mission . .7 Challenges . .9 Resource allocation—human and financial . .9 Public positioning . .9 Capacity . .9 Funding considerations .
    [Show full text]
  • LOGITERM NEWS All You Need to Know About Terminotix Products Number 3, May 2008
    TERMINOLOGY ALIGNMENT FULL-TEXT BITEXTS TERM EXTRACTION PRETRANSLATION LOGITERM NEWS All you need to know about Terminotix products Number 3, May 2008 LOGITERMWEB 4.0 TERMINOTIX AND BEETEXT PARTNERSHIP Terminotix is proud to announce that version 4.0 of its Terminotix and Beetext have formed a partnership to powerful LogiTermWeb software will be available in create and provide computer-assisted translation June. This long-awaited version includes major solutions. Montreal-based Beetext is known for its enhancements and new features such as the following: translation request management software, Flow. Significantly faster document indexing and Terminotix has designed a LogiTermWeb application searching program interface (API) for Beetext Flow, thereby An integrated search page with tabs for broadening the Terminotix range of computer-assisted LogiTermWeb databases, Termium and other translation solutions and professional services. resources Numerous companies use Beetext Flow to effectively A combined Pretranslation-LogiTrans function that manage translation requests. The integration of Flow can perform both operations simultaneously and LogiTermWeb makes it possible to automate A new tool to insert LogiTrans output back into document analysis and pretranslation using Microsoft Excel and Microsoft PowerPoint files LogiTermWeb Bitext and Terminology databases. For A new tool to align manually-selected passages in a more detailed information, please write to us at text [email protected]. Filters to fine-tune bitexts as they are being created An editor for making alignment corrections ANEW PRESIDENT A new terminology record creation tool with integrated context and Terminology database Micheline M. Cloutier has appointed Jean-François lookup functionality Richard as president of Terminotix and member of the For more information on LogiTermWeb 4.0, please Executive Committee (chaired by Ms.
    [Show full text]
  • A Short History of Voluntary Sector-Government Relations in Canada
    A Short History of Voluntary Sector-Government Relations in Canada BY PETER R. ELSON* A Short History of Voluntary Sector-Government Relations in Canada The purpose of this article is to present an overview of the history of volun- tary sector-government relations in Canada. This is a rich history, which is often overlooked and chronically underappreciated. This historical overview will cov- er dominant themes within each of five periods in the evolution of the voluntary sector-government relations in Canada: 1) the emergence of the federal state and moral charity; 2) the political and social reformation in the late 1800s and early 1900s; 3) the rise of the welfare state and the voluntary sector following WWII; 4) the fall and rise of voluntary sector-government relations, which covers the period from the mid 1970s to the present day; and 5) an analysis of contemporary voluntary sector-government relations. The Emergence of the Federal State and Moral Charity The pre-Confederation period in Canada can be divided into three distinct re- gional trajectories: Atlantic Canada, Upper Canada, and Lower Canada. Survival in Canada’s harsh climate and sparsely populated landscape depended on indi- vidual determination, a communal spirit, and strategic political and economic alliances. These alliances were more often than not with aboriginal peoples who inhabited North America for thousand of years before European explorers arrived (Hall, Barr, Easwaramoorthy, Sokolowski, & Salamon, 2005; Thompson, 1962). It was with the arrival of European settlers in Atlantic Canada, New France, and Upper Canada that formal governance structures, processes and services, such as social services, education, and welfare, started to take shape.
    [Show full text]
  • Moving Beyond Laissez Faire Philanthropyi
    From Crisis to Opportunity: Moving Beyond Laissez Faire PhilanthropyI EVERT A. LINDQUIST Department ofPolitical Science, University of Toronto Canada's voluntary sector is under great stress. Protracted constitutional nego­ tiations and continuing economic difficulties have put considerable pressure on the federal government to contain spending on, or devolve responsibility for, a range of human service programs embracing the broad categories of health, education, welfare, and culture. However, from a fiscal standpoint, devolving program responsibilities to lower levels of government only shifts the painful choices to provincial and local leaders. An alternative strategy is to rely more heavily on private donors (individuals, corporations and founda­ tions) and providers to deliver services once administered by governments. Yet a steadily deteriorating economy and government cutbacks have caused requests for support to skyrocket and overwhelm donors, many of whom feel squeezed by the recession and the broader economic restructuring in train. For those who support, work in, and are served by the voluntary sector, these developments are ominous. For many social activists and human service providers there has been a bright spot in the continuing constitutional struggle: the movement to entrench a social charter or covenant will probably succeed.2 Indeed, even if the consti­ tutional negotiations were to fail, it seems likely that there would be consider­ able pressure to adopt social charters in the resulting jurisdictions; however, this advance may well be symbolic. Charters simply set out principles and the obligations of governments to their citizens; they do not ensure that human service providers will receive, despite increasing demands, more support from the government nor do they delineate what responsibilities citizens, corpora­ tions and foundations should assume in this regard.
    [Show full text]
  • A State of the Art Review of Income Security Reform in Canada
    IDRC tib. 4 0 i ao Working Series Paper #4 A State of the Art Review of Income Security Reform in Canada Jane Pulkingham Simon Fraser University and Gordon Ternowetsky University of Northern British Columbia This document is disseminated as part of a Working Paper Series of IDRC's Assessment of Social Policy Reforms (ASPR) Programme Initiative. ASPR draws on the knowledge and experience of a wide variety of experts. Documents made available through the Working Paper Series are intended to contribute to the debate around ASPR's areas of research. The views expressed in this paper are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect those of the International Development Research Centre or ASPR. IDRC/CRDI Ottawa, Canada April, 1998 INTERNATIONAL DEVELOPMENT RESEARCH CENTRE Ottawa / Cairo / Johannesburg / Montevideo / Nairobi / New Delhi / Singapore Ak.Gf r 3 t 2 "= 1 PREFACE A State of the Art Review: Income Security Reform in Canada INTRODUCTION In both the North and South today, in the context of broader social policy reform trends, increasing attention is being devoted to the revision of social security systems. Globalization, demographic shifts, employment trends and growing poverty underlie a re-examination of the capacity of these systems to protect the basic welfare of societies. Moreover, these reforms are occurring in the context of neo-liberal adjustment and conservative fiscal strategies. Whether in developing or OECD countries, social security systems-- encompassing pension programs, social assistance plans, income support programs and social transfers-- are being considered in light of growing concerns with the limited capacities of states, pre-occupations with affordability and sustainability, a preference for the allocative efficiency of the market, and ideologies which delegate greater responsibility for social welfare to communities and individuals.
    [Show full text]
  • Suncor Energy Foundation – Finaical Statements 2015
    Suncor Energy Foundation Financial Statements December 31, 2015 April 5, 2016 Independent Auditor’s Report To the Board of Directors of Suncor Energy Foundation We have audited the accompanying financial statements of Suncor Energy Foundation, which comprise the statement of financial position as at December 31, 2015 and the statements of operations and changes in net assets and the statement of cash flows for the year then ended, and the related notes, which comprise a summary of significant accounting policies and other explanatory information. Management’s responsibility for the financial statements Management is responsible for the preparation and fair presentation of these financial statements in accordance with Canadian accounting standards for not-for-profit organizations, and for such internal control as management determines is necessary to enable the preparation of financial statements that are free from material misstatement, whether due to fraud or error. Auditor’s responsibility Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements based on our audit. We conducted our audit in accordance with Canadian generally accepted auditing standards. Those standards require that we comply with ethical requirements and plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free from material misstatement. An audit involves performing procedures to obtain audit evidence about the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. The procedures selected depend on the auditor’s judgment, including the assessment of the risks of material misstatement of the financial statements, whether due to fraud or error. In making those risk assessments, the auditor considers internal control relevant to the entity’s preparation and fair presentation of the financial statements in order to design audit procedures that are appropriate in the circumstances, but not for the purpose of expressing an opinion on the effectiveness of the entity’s internal control.
    [Show full text]
  • United Way of Greater Victoria: Connecting with Millennials
    Journal of Business Cases and Applications Volume 15 United Way of Greater Victoria: Connecting with Millennials Dr. Rebecca Grant University of Victoria ABSTRACT This is a live case, based on the experiences of fundraisers for the United Way of Greater Victoria (UWGV). It is set in Autumn, 2015 – prime season for fundraising. Runs for cancer research and treatment, lotteries for hospital charities, and many more, filled the landscape in Greater Victoria. It was also the season of United Way workplace campaigns, the major fundraising effort of UWGV) It Brittany Decker, Director Community Campaign, was considering once again how long the organization could sustain itself by relying on donations from the workplace. As the donor population aged, it seemed increasingly important to connect with Millennials, Canadians between the ages of 18 and 30. While the United Way’s mission – to improve lives and build community – was important, traditional fundraising didn’t seem to resonate with Millennials. Students are challenged to develop a strategy whereby could UWGV become a charity of choice for new, young donors? Keywords: Not-for-profit; social media; charity; Millennial; fundraising Note: A full teaching note is available on request directly from the author at [email protected] Copyright statement: Authors retain the copyright to the manuscripts published in AABRI journals. Please see the AABRI Copyright Policy at http://www.aabri.com/copyright.html United Way of Greater Victoria, Page 1 Journal of Business Cases and Applications Volume 15 INTRODUCTION Autumn was prime time for fundraising. Runs for cancer research and treatment, lotteries for hospital charities, and many more, filled the landscape.
    [Show full text]
  • PRISM::Advent3b2 8.00
    CANADA House of Commons Debates VOLUME 140 Ï NUMBER 030 Ï 1st SESSION Ï 38th PARLIAMENT OFFICIAL REPORT (HANSARD) Tuesday, November 23, 2004 Speaker: The Honourable Peter Milliken CONTENTS (Table of Contents appears at back of this issue.) All parliamentary publications are available on the ``Parliamentary Internet Parlementaire´´ at the following address: http://www.parl.gc.ca 1691 HOUSE OF COMMONS Tuesday, November 23, 2004 The House met at 10 a.m. COMMITTEES OF THE HOUSE AGRICULTURE AND AGRI-FOOD Mr. Paul Steckle (Huron—Bruce, Lib.): Mr. Speaker, I have the Prayers honour to present, in both official languages, the first report of the Standing Committee on Agriculture and Agri-Food. In accordance with its order of reference of Friday, October 8, the ROUTINE PROCEEDINGS committee has considered votes 1, 5, 10, 15, 20, 25, 30, 35 and 40 under Agriculture and Agri-Food in the main estimates for the fiscal (1000) Ï year ending March 31, 2005 and reports the same, less the amounts [English] granted in interim supply. ORDER IN COUNCIL APPOINTMENTS *** Hon. Dominic LeBlanc (Parliamentary Secretary to the PETITIONS Leader of the Government in the House of Commons, Lib.): Mr. Speaker, I have the honour to table, in both official languages, a CANADIAN FORCES HOUSING AGENCY number of order in council appointments recently made by the government. Mr. Jay Hill (Prince George—Peace River, CPC): Mr. Speaker, as has become a pattern here, it is a privilege to present yet another *** petition on behalf of our military families. Ï (1005) The petition was sent in by citizens of Borden, Levack, Onaping and Schreiber, Ontario.
    [Show full text]
  • UNE ÉTUDE DE CAS DE LA RADIO COMMUNAUTAIRE À MONTEVIDEO (URUGUAY) Er À MONTRÉAL (QUÉBEC)
    UNIVERSITÉ DU QUÉBEC À MONTRÉAL MÉDIA CITOYENS: UNE ÉTUDE DE CAS DE LA RADIO COMMUNAUTAIRE À MONTEVIDEO (URUGUAY) Er À MONTRÉAL (QUÉBEC) MÉMOIRE PRÉSENTÉ COMME EXIGENCE PARTlELLE DE LA MAÎTRISE EN COMMUNICATION PAR EVAN L1GHT JANVIER 2007 UNIVERSITÉ DU QUÉBEC À MONTRÉAL A MEDIA OF C1TIZENS : A CASE STUDY OF COMMUNITY RADIO IN MONTRÉAL (QU~:Bf:C) AND MONTEV1DEO (URUGUAY) THESIS SUBMIITED IN PARTIAL FULFILLMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS fOR THE DEGREE OF MASTER lN COMMUNICATION BY EVAN L1GHT JAl UARY 2007 UNIVERSITÉ DU QUÉBEC À MONTRÉAL Service des bibliothèques Avertissement La diffusion de ce mémoire se fait dans le respect des droits de son auteur, qui a signé le formulaire Autorisation de reproduire et de diffuser un travail de recherche de cycles supérieurs (SDU-522 - Rév.01-2006). Cette autorisation stipule que «conformément à l'article 11 du Règlement no 8 des études de cycles supérieurs, [l'auteur] concède à l'Université du Québec à Montréal une licence non exclusive d'utilisation et de publication de la totalité ou d'une partie importante de [son] travail de recherche pour des fins pédagogiques et non commerciales. Plus précisément, [l'auteur] autorise l'Université du Québec à Montréal à reproduire, diffuser, prêter, distribuer ou vendre des copies de [son] travail de recherche à des fins non commerciales sur quelque support que ce soit, y compris l'Internet. Cette licence et cette autorisation n'entraînent pas une renonciation de [la] part [de l'auteur] à [ses] droits moraux ni à [ses] droits de propriété intellectuelle. Sauf entente contraire, [l'auteur] conserve la liberté de diffuser et de commercialiser ou non ce travail dont [il] possède un exemplaire.» AVANT-PROPOS Within the following pages, 1 examllle the l'oies, potentials and limitations of community radio.
    [Show full text]
  • 2016-UWCC-Annual-Report-EN.Pdf
    STR NGER TOGETHER LEVERAGING OUR COLLECTIVE STRENGTH 2016 Annual Report STR NGER TOGETHER 01 2016 REVIEW 17 LEADERSHIP 06 SPECIAL THANKS 19 OUR TEAM 08 OUR COMMITMENT 21 ACROSS CANADA 09 FINANCIAL REPORT 2016 REVIEW MESSAGE FROM THE CHAIR Enhancing our relevance and sustainability coast to coast in 2016, seeking to explore new ways of working together. Regional and AND THE PRESIDENT & CEO For our National Office, United Way Centraide provincial forums aimed to define the future Canada, and local United Way Centraide offices of our Movement’s organizational structure, The United Way Centraide across the country, 2016 was a year focused energizing local leaders to embark on their on increased collaboration and foundational Movement draws its strength own change agendas. change in our Movement structures. In the from our ability to work together ongoing pursuit of our 10-Year Strategic The 2016 Annual General Meeting signaled Directions – aiming to build our relevance the introduction of our new Membership collectively. Our focus on improving and sustainability in a highly competitive and and Trademark License Agreements, and the lives in local communities is rapidly changing environment – we continued approval of a new formula to fund our national our collective work to strengthen the future of work. Each of these developments will continue bolstered by the collaboration our Movement and that of the communities to play a significant role in our accountability to we serve. one another within the Movement, and to our that takes place on a wide variety communities. Transforming for effectiveness of scales – from regional and Building a stronger brand As we strive to increase our impact in local provincial, to national and global.
    [Show full text]