Intersections and Innovations Change for Canada's Voluntary And
Total Page：16
File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
2018 02 22 REVISED Regional Council Agenda
CHAIR: F. DALE MEMBERS: G. CARLSON B. CROMBIE J. DOWNEY C. FONSECA The Council of the G. GIBSON A. GROVES Regional Municipality of Peel N. IANNICCA J. INNIS REVISED AGENDA L. JEFFREY Date: Thursday, February 22, 2018 J. KOVAC M. MAHONEY Time: 9:30 AM S. MCFADDEN th M. MEDEIROS Place: Council Chamber, 5 Floor G. MILES Regional Administrative Headquarters E. MOORE 10 Peel Centre Drive, Suite A M. PALLESCHI C. PARRISH Brampton, Ontario K. RAS P. SAITO B. SHAUGHNESSY For inquiries about this agenda or to make arrangements for accessibility J. SPROVIERI accommodations including alternate formats, please contact: R. STARR Christine Thomson at (905) 791-7800, ext. 4582 or at A. THOMPSON [email protected]. Agendas and reports are available at www.peelregion.ca/council Region of Peel Council Agenda Thursday, February 22, 2018 1. ROLL CALL 2. DECLARATIONS OF CONFLICTS OF INTEREST 3. APPROVAL OF MINUTES 3.1. February 8, 2018 Regional Council meeting 4. APPROVAL OF AGENDA 5. PUBLIC ANNOUNCEMENTS SPONSORED BY A MEMBER OF COUNCIL 6. DELEGATIONS 6.1. Jim Faught, Communications Director; Tom O'Callaghan, Deputy Project Director and Commercial Manager; Aitor Arbesu, Design Build Director; and Vicente Valencia, Chief Executive Officer, LINK427, Presenting the Highway 427 Expansion Project (See also Items Related to Public Works – Item 10.1) 6.2. Amanjot Singh, Senior Engineer, Water and Climate Change Science, Credit Valley Conservation Authority, Presenting the Impacts of Road Salt on Water Bodies 7. CONSENT AGENDA All items listed with an asterisk (*) are considered to be routine and non-controversial by Council and will be approved by one resolution. -
Featured Items
400,000 km Club Shelburne Maintenance Pays... It’s true Stronger maintenance Together. makes your car spring back to life. Shop FSHELBURNE’Sr NEWSPAPERee SINCE 1875Press Local. Today Friday Saturday Sunday Monday www.shelburnefreepress.ca Sun/Cloud Sun/Cloud Sun Rain Rain MAINTENANCE OFFER* SPRING • Tire rotation • ComprehensiveJust South of Primrose multi-point on Highway visual 10 inspection 519-925-2847 .75(Tax) Mailing Registration No. 40005412 Thursday, September 3, 2020 Volume 145, No. 36 • Oil, lube, and fi lter 400,000 KM CLUB - MAINTENANCE PAYS... Service centre information here IT COSTS 42% MORE MONEY TO FIX WHAT IS “BROKEN” Dave Besley VS PERFORMING PREVENTATIVE MAINTENANCE * Details in-storeSales Representative NAPA • • ShelburneP • 519-925-2761 y Dave e Besley, t a 24 n c MONTHS Sales Representativea e 40,000 KM r r o a [email protected] M W 126 Mainind St. E. Shelburne 519-925-2761 [email protected] Dave Besley, Sales Representative ONTO“I have buyers 126 Main St. E. Shelburne 519-925-2761 STAGElooking in your area:3! [email protected] Call Dave today.” “I have buyers WE’RE GETTING looking in your area: THERE, SHELBURNE! • 2015 Royal LePage Call Dave today.” TOP 3% OFDiamond SALES AwardIN MARKETPLACE Recipient - Top 3% in Marketplace • 2015 Royal LePage • One of Top Two Agents Diamond Award Recipient - Davein sales Besley volume for 2015 - Top 3% in Marketplace Royal LePage Shelburne • One of Top Two Agents Sales Representative in sales volume for 2015 - 519-925-2761 Royal LePage Shelburne CINSURANCEREW BROKERSSON At This Time, Crewson Insurance is asking that you Keep Calm, Don’t Panic GoWithCrowe.com &We’re Stay Here Home.To Help! 110 Adeline Street, Shelburne 519.925.3145 | crewsoninsurance.com Life Happens….We can HELP! 50% discount on our commission for the month of May Now is NOT the right time to sell your home, however we would like to help those who find it essential. -
Lehigh University's Project Impact: an Environmental Management Case Study
The Higher Education Center for Alcohol and Other Drug Prevention Funded by the U.S. Department of Education, with supplemental funding from The Robert Wood Johnson Foundation Reprinted from Journal of Drug Education and Awareness, 2003, Vol. 1, pp. 59-75, with permission of Nova Science Publishers, Inc., 400 Oser Avenue, Suite 1600, Hauppauge, NY 11788. Tel: 631- 231-7269; Fax: 631-231-8175; e-mail: [email protected], [email protected]; Web: www.novapublishers.com. Reprinted by the Higher Education Center for Alcohol and Other Drug Prevention • (800) 676-1730 • www.higheredcenter.org 60 John W. Smeaton, Madalyn C. Eadline, Brenda Egolf and William DeJong LEHIGH UNIVERSITY'S PROJECT IMPACT: AN ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT CASE STUDY High-risk drinking has been a long-standing problem on U.S. college campuses. According to national surveys of college students conducted by the Harvard School of Public Health, approximately 44% of college students engage in heavy, episodic drinking, which is defined for males as five or more drinks in a row within a two-week period, and as four or more drinks for females. 1, 2 About half of these heavy drinkers, or about one in five students overall, can be classified as frequent heavy drinkers, meaning that they drink at this level three or more times during a two-week period. These drinkers account for approximately 68% of all alcohol consumption by U.S. college students. 3 Progress in reducing heavy, episodic drinking among college students has been slow. One positive note is an increase in the percentage of students who abstain from drinking. -
What in the World 2020
Level 1 (Grades 5 and up) Th eWE Controversy Black Lives Matter Pandemic Update Th e Search for a COVID Vaccine 2020/2021: Issue 1 A monthly current events resource for Canadian classrooms Routing Slip: (please circulate) What in the World What in the World? Level 1, 2020/2021: Issue 1 Mission Statement PUBLISHER LesPlan Educational Services Ltd. aims to help teachers develop Eric Wieczorek students’ engagement in, understanding of, and ability to EDITOR-IN-CHIEF critically assess current issues and events by providing quality, Janet Radschun Wieczorek up-to-date, aff ordable, ready-to-use resources appropriate for ILLUSTRATOR use across the curriculum. Mike Deas CONTRIBUTORS Vivien Bowers Krista Clarke Denise Hadley Rosa Harris Jacinthe Lauzier Alexia Malo Catriona Misfeldt David Smart What in the World? © is published eight times during the school year by: LesPlan Educational Services Ltd. #1 - 4144 Wilkinson Road Victoria BC V8Z 5A7 www.lesplan.com [email protected] Phone: (toll free) 888 240-2212 Fax: (toll free) 888 240-2246 Twitter: @LesPlan Subscribe to What in the World? © at a cost of $24.75 per month, per school. Copyright and Licence I have had many parents comment to me Th ese materials are protected by copyright. about how great they think What in the Subscribers may copy each issue for use by World? is, and they look forward to each all students and teachers within one school. Subscribers must also ensure that the materials are month’s issue coming home...Th is is a great not made available to anyone outside their school. resource for a small country school to Complimentary sample explore the global issues that aff ect us all. -
Why Do Parties Cooperate in Presidentialism?
WHY DO PARTIES COOPERATE IN PRESIDENTIALISM? ELECTORAL AND GOVERNMENT COALITION FORMATION IN LATIN AMERICA ¿Por qué los partidos cooperan en sistemas presidenciales? Formación de coaliciones electorales y de gobierno en América Latina KENNETH BUNKER Universitá degli Studi di Milano [email protected] Cómo citar/Citation Bunker, K. (2019). Why do parties cooperate in presidentialism? Electoral and government coalition formation in Latin America. Revista de Estudios Políticos, 186, 171-199. doi: https://doi.org/10.18042/cepc/rep.186.06 Abstract The purpose of this article is to explore coalition formation in presidential sys- tems using evidence from Latin America. It puts forward three hypotheses based on formateur power, electoral structures and party systems to explore when and why electoral and government coalition formation occurs. It uses evidence stemming from eighteen democratic presidential regimes in Latin America from 1980 to 2010. It looks at 100 elections and 407 aggregate years of democratic government. It anal- yses data organized in a cross-sectional time-series fashion through a logit function with random effects and robust standard errors. It finds that in democracies with weak presidents, restrictive electoral rules and highly fragmented party systems, the president will seek the support of multiple parties. While the effective number of par- ties is the most important determinant, rules related to legislative elections are more important predictors of electoral coalitions, and those related to presidential elections are more important predictors of government coalitions. The findings in this article are important insofar as yielding critical insight into partisan strategies in both the run-up to elections and the maintenance of governments, as well as contributing to a general theory of coalition formation. -
A Developmental Evaluation Primer
A Developmental Evaluation Primer Jamie A.A. Gamble The J.W. McConnell Family Foundation About the Foundation Established in 1937 by philanthropist and entrepreneur John Wilson McConnell, The J.W. McConnell Family Foundation funds projects in Canada that foster citizen engagement, build resilient communities and have the potential for national scale or impact. A Developmental Evaluation Primer Jamie A.A. Gamble Our vision at The J.W. McConnell Family Foundation is a Canada where all people have the opportunity to develop their potential and contribute to the betterment of their communities and country. Over the years, the ways to achieve this have evolved; what remains central to its purpose is the importance of community, how people contribute, and the Foundation's need to make choices in its granting decisions, to take risks, to learn and to be engaged with its grantees. In the process of developing and supporting programs, the Foundation has come to appreciate better the importance of innovation, the exploring of new and effective ways of addressing intractable social problems, and the challenge of ensuring that these new approaches are sustained. The J.W. McConnell Family Foundation A Developmental Evaluation Primer The J.W. McConnell Family Foundation Table of contents Foreword 4 Sponsors of the Developmental Evaluation Workshops 7 1 Introduction to Developmental Evaluation 10 1.1 What is Developmental Evaluation? 12 1.2 Myths about Developmental Evaluation 21 1.3 Assessing Conditions for DE 25 2 Applying Developmental Evaluation 29 2.1 Who is the Developmental Evaluator? 36 2.2 Skills of the Developmental Evaluator 40 2.3 DE Tools 46 2.4 Issues and Challenges 53 2.5 Future Potential: Directions for DE 57 About the Author 59 Appendix A: Comparing DE to Traditional Evaluation 61 Appendix B: Participating Organizations 63 The J.W. -
Advocacy on the Agenda: Preparing Voluntary Boards for Public Policy
Advocacy on the Agenda: Preparing voluntary boards for public policy participation Acknowledgements Volunteer Canada gratefully acknowledges the author, Annette Hegel, as well as the writing and editing contributions of the following people: Paddy Bowen, Volunteer Canada Louise Chatterton Luchuk Liz Weaver, Volunteer Hamilton We also wish to thank United Way of Canada-Centraide Canada for their collaborative contribution and the following members of the Advisory Committee for their valuable work on this project: Noella Beausoleil, United Way of Canada-Centraide Canada Bruce Burrows, Railway Association of Canada Dr. Janice Forsyth, United Way of Windsor-Essex Maryann Istiloglu, Parkinson Society Canada Ruth MacKenzie, Volunteer Canada Allan Rix, Centre for Voluntary Sector Research and Development Penelope Rowe, Community Services Council of Newfoundland Kathryn Tregunna, Canadian Healthcare Association The Social Development Partnerships Program of Human Resources Development Canada is pleased to have provided financial support to this project. The views expressed in this publication do not necessarily reflect those of Human Resources Development Canada. Aussi disponibles en français. Please note: This document has been translated into French but does not reflect the distinct characteristics of québécois policies and public policy development. This is a literal translation and is not to be considered as a socio-political interpretation. ISBN 0-9733191-2-7 © Volunteer Canada, 2003 Table of Contents Making the case for public policy involvement . .3 The boards’ role in advocacy and policy making . .5 Benefits to society and the organization . .7 Civic participation . .7 Capacity building . .7 Mission . .7 Challenges . .9 Resource allocation—human and financial . .9 Public positioning . .9 Capacity . .9 Funding considerations . -
WE Scandal: Trudeau's Approval Drops Six More Points, But
WE Scandal: Trudeau’s approval drops six more points, but Canadians doubt issue will bring down government Half (53%) say their opinion of the PM has worsened in the last month July 27, 2020 – The WE Charity Do you approve or disapprove of Justin Trudeau? affair may be stoking another summer of discontent among Canadians but ultimately, they do not believe this latest ethics 64% scandal will prove fatal to the 60% 61% 54% 55% 54% Liberal minority government. 51% 50% 43% Against the backdrop of the 35% 36% 48% COVID-19 pandemic response, 44% 44% 44% Prime Minister Justin Trudeau’s 33% own approval numbers, and those of his government, had rebounded 5% 6% in recent months. Then came WE. 3% 3% 2% 1% 2% 2% Now, the latest data from the non- profit Angus Reid Institute shows Oct 2019 Dec 2019 Jan 2020 Feb 2020 Apr 2020 May Jul 10- Jul 23- three-in-five (59%) feel the issue is 2020 11/20 24/20 a serious and significant one, twice the number who say it has been overblown by the media and Approve Disapprove Don't know opposition politicians. METHODOLOGY: A plurality (43%) say the Trudeau government knowingly committed The Angus Reid Institute conducted an online survey from July 23 – 24, an unethical act, while almost as 2020 among a representative randomized sample of 1,519 Canadian many (37%) feel the government’s adults who are members of Angus Reid Forum. For comparison decisions in regard to the charity purposes only, a probability sample of this size would carry a margin of constitute a possibly criminal act error of +/- 2.5 percentage points, 19 times out of 20. -
Download File
BIG LEARNING IN SMALL COMMUNITIES: EXPLORING WITH YPAR IN INTERNATIONAL SCHOOLS Lora Elaine Hawkins Submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy under the Executive Committee of the Graduate School of Arts and Sciences COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY 2021 © 2021 Lora Hawkins All Rights Reserved ABSTRACT BIG LEARNING IN SMALL COMMUNITIES: EXPLORING WITH YPAR IN INTERNATIONAL SCHOOLS Lora Hawkins This study is a critical evaluation conducted by a Youth-led Participatory Action research team that has, over the course of five years, sought to investigate culturally responsive pedagogies in international schools populated with Third Culture Kids. Previous to this work, the youth researchers and I developed an interdisciplinary, choice and project-based honors program which we called the Small Learning Community. As such, this program became the object of and context for this review. We were guided by the question, What are, if any, the perceived learning benefits for students in the Small Learning Community?, and we sought to critically evaluate the program’s perceived impact on meaningful learning experiences, student agency, and transference of skills. We leveraged constructivist-oriented Grounded Theory—in part because of the value this approach assigns to emic knowledge—to examine interview transcripts of SLC participants. I then developed case studies and argue for pedagogical shifts in the international classroom that center more deliberately on (1) active participation, (2) the perception of new, (3) choice, (4) attention to process, (5) personal interest, and (6) social emotional learning, while addressing the need for more intentional and systematic practitioner research. TABLE OF CONTENTS LIST OF TABLES…………………………………………………………………………. -
Received by NSD/FARA Registration Unit 05/19/2021 8:45:55 AM
Received by NSD/FARA Registration Unit 05/19/2021 8:45:55 AM 10/15/20 Wires This material is distributed by Ghebi LLC on behalf of Federal State Unitary Enterprise Rossiya Segodnya International Information Agency, and additional information is on file with the Department of Justice, Washington, District of Columbia. CSPAN Suspends Steve Scully for Lying About His Twitter Account Being Hacked - Statement WASHINGTON, October 15 (Sputnik) - The cable network C-SPAN said in a statement on Thursday that it has suspended its lead reporter Steve Scully after admitting he lied about his Twitter account being hacked when he publicly reached out to former US President Donald Trump’s aide Anthony Scaramucci on the social media platform. "Starting immediately, we have placed Steve on administrative leave," the statement said. "After some distance from this episode, we believe in his ability to continue to contribute to C-SPAN." On October 8, Scully asked Scaramucci in a now-deleted tweet whether he should respond to Trump after Trump criticized him on national television that day. Scully was originally set to server as the moderator in the now-canceled second presidential debate that would have taken place on Thursday night. Scully said in a statement that he sent the tweet to Scaramucci because he was frustrated over criticism he received on social media and from the US president. CSPAN said Scully informed the network and the Commission on Presidential Debates on Wednesday that his hacking claim was false. Trump said in a statement the second presidential debate would have been rigged and that the Commission has not treated his re-election campaign fairly. -
Subsystem Interconnectedness As Part of Coalition Strategies for Policy Change: Mining and Water Management in Ecuador Between 1991 and 2010
Subsystem interconnectedness as part of coalition strategies for policy change: mining and water management in Ecuador between 1991 and 2010. Paúl Cisneros*† 1. Introduction The policy subsystem is the main unit of analysis in several theoretical frameworks that study policy processes including Punctuated Equilibrium, Social Construction and Policy Design and the Advocacy Coalition Framework (Jochim & May, 2009) . For over a decade, scholars refining these frameworks have focused on the emergence, change, and destruction of subsystems, paying little attention to interactions between subsystems as a potential avenue for policy change (Jones & Jenkins-Smith, 2009). More recently, scholars working within the research program of the ACF have expressed interest in exploring "subsystem interconnectedness and how exogenous drivers intervene with internal subsystem factors in producing policy change" Douglas, Ingold, Nohrstedt, and Weible (2014, p. 306). These studies show how coalitions use interactions between levels of governance to maintain their preferred policies in specific subsystems (Montefrio, 2014) and how opportunity structures impact coalition strategies in different types of subsystems (Gupta, 2014). Our study is inscribed in this emerging literature and explores subsystem interconnectedness as part of coalition strategies to attempt policy change. In this paper we show that studying subsystem interconnectedness could be of particular importance to understand policy change in nascent subsystems in unstable political environments. Drawing from social movements literature (Meyer, 2005; Tarrow, 2011), we argue that regime instability opens opportunities for revisionist coalitions to strategize the interactions between new or existing subsystems and the macro system in order to advance their policy objectives. These strategies should be more prevalent where subsystems do not enjoy great autonomy and complex policy communities have not yet developed. -
United States of America Before the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA BEFORE THE FEDERAL ENERGY REGULATORY COMMISSION ) Tennessee Gas Pipeline Company, L.L.C. ) Docket No. CP-11-161-000 ) REQUEST FOR REHEARING SUBMITTED BY DELAWARE RIVERKEEPER NETWORK, NEW JERSEY HIGHLANDS COALITION, and THE NEW JERSEY CHAPTER OF THE SIERRA CLUB Pursuant to Rule 713 of the Rules of Practice and Procedure of the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (“Commission”), 18 C.F.R. § 385.713 (2010), Delaware Riverkeeper Network, New Jersey Highlands Coalition, and the New Jersey Chapter of the Sierra Club (collectively “Intervenors”) hereby request rehearing and rescission of the Commission’s May 29, 2012 Order (“Order”) granting a Certificate of Public Necessity and Convenience (“Certificate”) to Tennessee Gas Pipeline Company, L.L.C. (“Tennessee”) to construct the Northeast Upgrade Project (“NEUP” or “Project”). Intervenors seek rehearing and rescission of the Commission’s Order because the environmental review underlying the conclusions in the Order fails to meet the requirements of the National Environmental Policy Act (“NEPA”), 42 U.S.C. § 4321 et seq. (2006), and its implementing regulations, 40 C.F.R. Pts. 1500-08. Based on this flawed environmental review, the Commission improperly determined that the public benefits of the NEUP outweigh its adverse impacts, thus violating the Natural Gas Act (“NGA”), 15 U.S.C. §§ 717f (2006) and its implementing regulations, 18 C.F.R. Part 157 (2011). I. Statement of Relevant Facts Tennessee filed an application on March 31, 2011, for a Certificate authorizing the company to construct, install, modify, operate, and maintain the components of the NEUP in 1 Pennsylvania and New Jersey.