The Torpedo Bay Excavations: Volume 1, the Pre-European Maori Site (HPA Authority 2009/275)

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

The Torpedo Bay Excavations: Volume 1, the Pre-European Maori Site (HPA Authority 2009/275) The Torpedo Bay excavations: Volume 1, the pre-European Maori site (HPA authority 2009/275) report to Heritage New Zealand Pouhere Taonga and The New Zealand Defence Force Matthew Campbell, Mica Plowman, Emma Brooks, Arden Cruickshank, Louise Furey, Mark Horrocks, Marianne Turner, Rod Wallace and Richard Walter The Torpedo Bay excavations: Volume 1, the pre-European Maori site (HPA authority 2009/275) report to Heritage New Zealand Pouhere Taonga and The New Zealand Defence Force Prepared by: Matthew Campbell Reviewed by: Date: 10 December 2018 Louise Furey Reference: 17-0773 This report is made available by CFG Heritage Ltd under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/. CFG Heritage Ltd. 132 Symonds St Eden Terrace Auckland 1010 ph. (09) 309 2426 [email protected] Hard copy distribution Heritage New Zealand Pouhere Taonga, Auckland New Zealand Archaeological Association (file copy) CFG Heritage Ltd (file copy) New Zealand Defense Force Marutuahu Collective Ngai Tai ki Tamaki Ngati Paoa Ngati Whatua o Orakei Te Kawerau a Maki Auckland War Memorial Museum Auckland Coucnil Cultural Heritage Inventory University of Auckland General Library University of Otago Anthropology Department This report is provided electronically Please consider the environment before printing Contents Summary ....................................................................... v 1 Introduction . 1 2 Background . 3 A Maori history of Tamaki . 3 The archaeology of Aotearoa / New Zealand . 8 The archaeology of Tamaki . 21 Acknowledgements . 27 3 Archaeology . 29 Methodology . 29 Stratigraphy . 31 Chronology . 43 Summary: site formation processes . 47 4 Material Culture . 49 Formal tools . 49 Flaked stone . 51 Discussion . 56 5 Faunal Analysis . 59 Methods . 59 Bird . 60 Reptile . 62 Mammal . 62 Fish . 63 Shellfish . 66 Interpretation . 68 Conclusion . 71 6 Environment . 73 Charcoal . 73 Microfossils . 75 Discussion . 76 7 Discussion and Conclusion . 81 The early archaeology of the upper North Island . 81 Torpedo Bay . 101 References . .. 103 iv Torpedo Bay Torpedo Bay v Summary • In 2009 site R11/1945, the Torpedo Bay Submarine Mining Base was excavated under archaeological authority 2009/275 . • An undisturbed pre-European Maori midden was discovered beneath the base office on an old beach terrace – an area of 5 5. x 4 7. m was excavated . • This midden had two main Phases of occupation: Layer 5 (Phase 1), containing extinct bird including moa, sea mammal and a diverse faunal assemblage; and Layers 3 and 2 (Phase 2), containing mostly shell with some fish and occasional dog . • These two layers were separated by Layers 4 (also Phase 1) and 3A, both of which appeared to be slopewash events and may be related to gardening on the slopes of Maungauika / North Head, just above the site . • Phase 1 dates to the 14th century AD; Phase 2 dates to the late 15th to mid-17th centuries AD . • At the time of excavation, this was the only 14th century site known from the Tamaki mainland and was considered highly significant; • Material culture was sparse but included: • three shell fishhook points from Phase 1; • a fragment of wooden tapa beater from Phase 1, preserved as charcoal; • an adze and a sinker from Phase 2; • and 73 flakes of obsidian, mostly form Tuhua / Mayor Island and mostly from Phase 1 . • Juvenile fur seal in Phase 1 indicated a summer occupation . • Spotted shag was the most common bird species, probably indicating a nearby rookery . • Snapper was the most common fish species, and the proportions of vertebrae to head bones indicated that snapper bodies had been preserved and transported off site in Phase 1 but in Phase 2 fish had been consumed on site . • Shellfish exploitation in Phase 1 centred on rocky shore species, while in Phase 2 soft shore species predominated . • The site is interpreted in relation to other 14th century upper North Island sites and with respect to recent archaeological thinking about the period AD 1300–1450 . 1 Introduction In 2009 the New Zealand Defence Force (NZDF) began redeveloping their facilities at the Torpedo Bay Boat Yard in Devonport, Auckland, as the new site of the Royal New Zealand Navy Museum . The Torpedo Bay Boat Yard is recorded as archaeological site R11/1945 in the New Zealand Archaeological Association (NZAA) Site Recording Scheme (SRS) . This includes both mid-19th century ship building (the Beddoes and Holmes Shipyard) and the subsequent military activities of the Torpedo Bay Submarine Mining Base which began construction in 1886 in response to the perceived threat of a Russian invasion . The site was originally recorded in 1996 by Tony Packington-Hall and related only to the historic mining base . Pre-European Maori sites are also recorded in Torpedo Bay: R11/1819, a working floor / find spot at the west- ern end of the bay; and R11/2169, a find spot of flakes and an adze at the eastern end, close to the mining base . A historic kainga, Haukapua, is recorded as site R11/2401 half way along the bay . The Torpedo Bay Submarine Mining Base began operations in 1886 and, following two periods of reclamation and building, was completed in 1899 . The site represents the last intact 19th century submarine mining base in New Zealand and forms part of a much larger com- plex relating to the coastal defence of Auckland in the late 19th century . Extant archaeological remains relating to the formation and occupation of the mining base are regionally and nation- ally significant . An archaeological assessment of the effects of the museum project on the archaeology of the site was prepared in 2009 by Opus International Consultants Limited (Opus) (Plowman 2009) . The report primarily assessed the effects of the project in the 19th century mining base but it did acknowledge the remote possibility that pre-European or historic Maori mate- rial might be also be present . NZDF then applied to the New Zealand Historic Places Trust (NZHPT) for an archaeological authority to modify, damage or destroy site R11/1945 under section 14 of the Historic Places Act 1993 . Authority 2009/275 was granted on 11 August 2009 . Excavation was undertaken in November 2009 under the direction of Mica Plowman from Opus . Numerous structural features associated with the submarine mining base were exca- vated, recorded in detail and sampled as appropriate . Recording included photography, detailed sections and plans of all identified internal and external subsurface structural features tied into an overall theodolite site plan . Following excavation, archaeological monitoring of stormwater trenching in the north west corner of the site revealed a pre-European Maori site consisting of several layers of midden, located on what would have been the original beach terrace that formed the eastern extent of Torpedo Bay prior to the military reclamations that have substantially altered the original shore- line and cliff face . Further excavations of the pre-European Maori site were undertaken under the direction of Mica Plowman between 24 March and 5 April 2010 . Preliminary reports on the excavations were prepared by Mica Plowman as a require- ment of Condition 19 of authority 2009/275 but she subsequently left her employment at Opus and the final reports, as required under Condition 20 of the authority, were never completed . In April 2013 NZHPT granted an extension to the deadline for reporting and agreed that the pre-European Maori site and the historic mining base could be reported separately, with measured drawings of the buildings supplied as an appendix to the latter . A draft report for the mining base was completed by Ken Phillips but no final report was prepared . In 2017 NZDF approached Matthew Campbell of CFG Heritage Ltd and requested that he prepare the final reports . This volume presents the results of the pre-European Maori excavations; Volume 2 will present the results of the 19th century historic excavations . 2 Background The historical and archaeological background to the Torpedo Bay excavation are provided here in two parts . Firstly, an account of Maori tradition is taken from public documents, includ- ing published works and unpublished reports, which between them present a complex and often contradictory and confusing story . This account has been condensed into a short, relatively com- prehensible account – mana whenua may have other traditions and other views that do not agree with parts of this account . A general Maori history of Tamaki is given before a more specific Maori history of Devonport . Secondly, the basis of the archaeology of Torpedo Bay is outlined from a number of perspectives: the nature of early archaeology in New Zealand (the lower layers of the excavated site date to this period); the general sequence of pre-European Maori archaeol- ogy; the archaeology of Tamaki; and the archaeology of Devonport . No concerted attempt is made to align the traditional and archaeological histories – while both deal with the same past and can inform each other, they are different kinds of knowledge about the past and any statements about archaeological processes and events made on the basis of traditional history must be made with great care . A Maori history of Tamaki Auckland was known to Maori as Tamaki Makau Rau, Tamaki of the hundred lovers 1. Fertile, well drained volcanic soils and a mild climate were perfectly suited to Maori horticul- ture; the volcanic cones were ideal places to establish pa as statements of political power and places of refuge in times of trouble; the Waitemata and Manukau harbours provided abun- dant fish and shellfish; and the narrow isthmus meant that portages between the two harbours allowed canoes to move between the east and west coasts without going the long way around Northland . Among the first occupants of Tamaki were a people known as Turehu, or ‘the people from the earth’ (Murdoch 1990: 13) .
Recommended publications
  • Tamaki Strait: Marine Benthic Habitats, Ecological Values and Threats August TR 2010/038
    Tamaki Strait: Marine benthic habitats, ecological values and threats August TR 2010/038 Auckland Regional Council Technical Report No.038 August 2010 ISSN 1179-0504 (Print) ISSN 1179-0512 (Online) ISBN 978-1-877540-94-3 Reviewed by: Approved for ARC Publication by: Name: Jarrod Walker Name: Grant Barnes Position Group Manager Monitoring and Position: Project Leader – Marine Research Organisation: Auckland Regional Council Organisation: Auckland Regional Council Date: 1st October 2010 Date: 1st October 2010 Recommended Citation: Chiaroni, L., Hewitt, J.E., Hailes, S. F. (2010) Tamaki Strait: Marine benthic habitats, ecological values and threats. Prepared by National Institute of Water and Atmospheric Research for Auckland Regional Council. Auckland Regional Council TR2010/038. © 2010 Auckland Regional Council This publication is provided strictly subject to Auckland Regional Council's (ARC) copyright and other intellectual property rights (if any) in the publication. Users of the publication may only access, reproduce and use the publication, in a secure digital medium or hard copy, for responsible genuine non-commercial purposes relating to personal, public service or educational purposes, provided that the publication is only ever accurately reproduced and proper attribution of its source, publication date and authorship is attached to any use or reproduction. This publication must not be used in any way for any commercial purpose without the prior written consent of ARC. ARC does not give any warranty whatsoever, including without limitation, as to the availability, accuracy, completeness, currency or reliability of the information or data (including third party data) made available via the publication and expressly disclaim (to the maximum extent permitted in law) all liability for any damage or loss resulting from your use of, or reliance on the publication or the information and data provided via the publication.
    [Show full text]
  • Auckland Plan Targets: Monitoring Report 2015 with DATA for the SOUTHERN INITIATIVE AREA
    Auckland plan targets: monitoring report 2015 WITH DATA FOR THE SOUTHERN INITIATIVE AREA Auckland Plan Targets: Monitoring Report 2015 With Data for the Southern Initiative Area March 2016 Technical Report 2016/007 Auckland Council Technical Report 2016/007 ISSN 2230-4525 (Print) ISSN 2230-4533 (Online) ISBN 978-0-9941350-0-1 (Print) ISBN 978-0-9941350-1-8 (PDF) This report has been peer reviewed by the Peer Review Panel. Submitted for review on 26 February 2016 Review completed on 18 March 2016 Reviewed by one reviewer. Approved for Auckland Council publication by: Name: Dr Lucy Baragwanath Position: Manager, Research and Evaluation Unit Date: 18 March 2016 Recommended citation Wilson, R., Reid, A and Bishop, C (2016). Auckland Plan targets: monitoring report 2015 with data for the Southern Initiative area. Auckland Council technical report, TR2016/007 Note This technical report updates and replaces Auckland Council technical report TR2015/030 Auckland Plan Targets: monitoring report 2015 which does not contain data for the Southern Initiative area. © 2016 Auckland Council This publication is provided strictly subject to Auckland Council's copyright and other intellectual property rights (if any) in the publication. Users of the publication may only access, reproduce and use the publication, in a secure digital medium or hard copy, for responsible genuine non-commercial purposes relating to personal, public service or educational purposes, provided that the publication is only ever accurately reproduced and proper attribution of its source, publication date and authorship is attached to any use or reproduction. This publication must not be used in any way for any commercial purpose without the prior written consent of Auckland Council.
    [Show full text]
  • Attachment J Assessment of Existing Paleontologic Data Along with Field Survey Results for the Jonah Field
    Attachment J Assessment of Existing Paleontologic Data Along with Field Survey Results for the Jonah Field June 12, 2007 ABSTRACT This is compilation of a technical analysis of existing paleontological data and a limited, selective paleontological field survey of the geologic bedrock formations that will be impacted on Federal lands by construction associated with energy development in the Jonah Field, Sublette County, Wyoming. The field survey was done on approximately 20% of the field, primarily where good bedrock was exposed or where there were existing, debris piles from recent construction. Some potentially rich areas were inaccessible due to biological restrictions. Heavily vegetated areas were not examined. All locality data are compiled in the separate confidential appendix D. Uinta Paleontological Associates Inc. was contracted to do this work through EnCana Oil & Gas Inc. In addition BP and Ultra Resources are partners in this project as they also have holdings in the Jonah Field. For this project, we reviewed a variety of geologic maps for the area (approximately 47 sections); none of maps have a scale better than 1:100,000. The Wyoming 1:500,000 geology map (Love and Christiansen, 1985) reveals two Eocene geologic formations with four members mapped within or near the Jonah Field (Wasatch – Alkali Creek and Main Body; Green River – Laney and Wilkins Peak members). In addition, Winterfeld’s 1997 paleontology report for the proposed Jonah Field II Project was reviewed carefully. After considerable review of the literature and museum data, it became obvious that the portion of the mapped Alkali Creek Member in the Jonah Field is probably misinterpreted.
    [Show full text]
  • Fisheries HEADLINERS
    This article was downloaded by: [Southern Illinois University] On: 31 October 2014, At: 10:56 Publisher: Taylor & Francis Informa Ltd Registered in England and Wales Registered Number: 1072954 Registered office: Mortimer House, 37-41 Mortimer Street, London W1T 3JH, UK Fisheries Publication details, including instructions for authors and subscription information: http://www.tandfonline.com/loi/ufsh20 HEADLINERS J. Bowker & J. Trushenski Published online: 11 Oct 2012. To cite this article: J. Bowker & J. Trushenski (2012) HEADLINERS, Fisheries, 37:10, 436-439 To link to this article: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/03632415.2012.723966 PLEASE SCROLL DOWN FOR ARTICLE Taylor & Francis makes every effort to ensure the accuracy of all the information (the “Content”) contained in the publications on our platform. However, Taylor & Francis, our agents, and our licensors make no representations or warranties whatsoever as to the accuracy, completeness, or suitability for any purpose of the Content. Any opinions and views expressed in this publication are the opinions and views of the authors, and are not the views of or endorsed by Taylor & Francis. The accuracy of the Content should not be relied upon and should be independently verified with primary sources of information. Taylor and Francis shall not be liable for any losses, actions, claims, proceedings, demands, costs, expenses, damages, and other liabilities whatsoever or howsoever caused arising directly or indirectly in connection with, in relation to or arising out of the use of the Content. This article may be used for research, teaching, and private study purposes. Any substantial or systematic reproduction, redistribution, reselling, loan, sub-licensing, systematic supply, or distribution in any form to anyone is expressly forbidden.
    [Show full text]
  • Dilemma of Geoconservation of Monogenetic Volcanic Sites Under Fast Urbanization and Infrastructure Developments with Special Re
    sustainability Article Dilemma of Geoconservation of Monogenetic Volcanic Sites under Fast Urbanization and Infrastructure Developments with Special Relevance to the Auckland Volcanic Field, New Zealand Károly Németh 1,2,3,* , Ilmars Gravis 3 and Boglárka Németh 1 1 School of Agriculture and Environment, Massey University, Palmerston North 4442, New Zealand; [email protected] 2 Institute of Earth Physics and Space Science, 9400 Sopron, Hungary 3 The Geoconservation Trust Aotearoa, 52 Hukutaia Road, Op¯ otiki¯ 3122, New Zealand; [email protected] * Correspondence: [email protected]; Tel.: +64-27-4791484 Abstract: Geoheritage is an important aspect in developing workable strategies for natural hazard resilience. This is reflected in the UNESCO IGCP Project (# 692. Geoheritage for Geohazard Resilience) that continues to successfully develop global awareness of the multifaced aspects of geoheritage research. Geohazards form a great variety of natural phenomena that should be properly identified, and their importance communicated to all levels of society. This is especially the case in urban areas such as Auckland. The largest socio-economic urban center in New Zealand, Auckland faces potential volcanic hazards as it sits on an active Quaternary monogenetic volcanic field. Individual volcanic geosites of young eruptive products are considered to form the foundation of community Citation: Németh, K.; Gravis, I.; outreach demonstrating causes and consequences of volcanism associated volcanism. However, in Németh, B. Dilemma of recent decades, rapid urban development has increased demand for raw materials and encroached Geoconservation of Monogenetic on natural sites which would be ideal for such outreach. The dramatic loss of volcanic geoheritage Volcanic Sites under Fast of Auckland is alarming.
    [Show full text]
  • March 2013 1 Appendix 3.1: Schedule Of
    Draft Auckland Unitary Plan – March 2013 Appendix 3.1: Schedule of Outstanding Natural Features Introduction The following criteria are used to determine the contents of this schedule, and will be used to consider any proposed additions to it. a. the extent to which the landform feature or geological site contributes to the understanding of the geology or evolution of the biota in the region, New Zealand or the earth (includes type localities of rock formations, minerals and fossils) b. the rarity or unusual nature of the site or feature; c. the extent to which the feature or site is an outstanding representative example of the diversity of natural landforms and geological features in Auckland; d. the extent to which the landform or geological feature or site is a component of a recognisable group of geologically associated features; e. the extent to which the landform or geological feature or site contributes to the aesthetic value or visual legibility of the wider natural landscape; f. the community association with, or public appreciation of the values of the feature or site g. the potential value of the feature or site for public education; h. the potential value of the feature or site to provide additional understanding of the geological or biotic history of the region; i. the state of preservation of the feature or site; j. the extent to which a feature or site is associated with an historically important natural event, geologically related industry, or individual involved in earth science research k. the importance of the feature or site to Mana Whenua; l.
    [Show full text]
  • Auckland Volcanic Field Magmatism, Volcanism, and Hazard: a Review
    1 This is an Accepted Manuscript of an article published by Taylor & Francis in New Zealand 2 Journal of Geology and Geophysics on 18 March 2020, available online: 3 http://www.tandfonline.com/10.1080/00288306.2020.1736102 4 5 6 Auckland Volcanic Field magmatism, volcanism, and hazard: a review 7 8 9 Jenni L Hopkins*1, Elaine R Smid*2, Jennifer D Eccles2, Josh L Hayes3, Bruce W Hayward4, Lucy E McGee5, 10 Kasper van Wijk2, Thomas M Wilson3, Shane J Cronin2, Graham S Leonard6, Jan M Lindsay2, Karoly 11 Németh7, Ian E M Smith2 12 13 *Corresponding Author(s): [email protected] / [email protected] 14 15 1Victoria University of Wellington, PO Box 600, Wellington, New Zealand 16 2 University of Auckland, Private Bag 92019, Auckland, New Zealand 17 3 University of Canterbury, Private Bag 4800, Christchurch, New Zealand 18 4 Geomarine Research, 19 Debron Ave, Remuera, Auckland, New Zealand 19 5 University of Adelaide, Adelaide, Australia 20 6 GNS Science, PO Box 30-368, Lower Hutt, New Zealand 21 7 Massey University, Private Bag 11 222, Palmerston North, New Zealand 22 23 24 25 26 27 Manuscript prepared for submission to the IAVCEI special issue of New Zealand Journal of Geology and 28 Geophysics 29 30 31 1 32 33 Keywords 34 intraplate, monogenetic volcanism, chronology, tephrochronology, volcanic hazard assessment, faulting, 35 magma ascent rates, geochemistry, eruption scenarios, New Zealand 2 36 Abstract 37 Auckland Volcanic Field (AVF) is a basaltic intraplate volcanic field in North Island, New Zealand, 38 upon which >1.6 million people live.
    [Show full text]
  • Motukorea Browns Island Archaeological Landscape
    Motukorea/Browns Island Archaeological Landscape Heritage Assessment Andy Dodd, DOC, Auckland conservvanncy 24 MAY 2006 Motukorea/Browns Island AArchaeeoologicaal Lanndssccape Heritage Assessment Andy Dodd, DOC, Aucklannd Conseervanccy 24 MAY 2006 Peer-reviewed by Sarah Maacreadyy, Aucklland Coonnservvanccy Cover image: Browns Island / Motukorea, Kevin L. Jones, May 2005 Publ.info. © New Zealand Department of Conservation ISBN 978-0-478-14303-4 (web PDF) CONTENTS 1. Site Overview 5 2. History description 5 3. Fabric description 6 4. Cultural connections 6 5. National context 7 6. Historic significance 7 7. Fabric significance 8 8. Cultural significance 8 9. Significant themes & site types 8 10. Management recommendations 9 11. Management history 10 12. Work vision statement 10 13. Sources & reports 11 14. Evaluation of sources 13 15. Location & site maps 13 16. Definitive photos 13 Endnotes 14 Map key 15 17. Chronology of events 19 Browns Island / Motukorea, Kevin L. Jones, May 2005 1. SITE OVVERVIIEW Motukorea / Browns Island has a long history of Polynesian occupation, with Ngati Tama Te Ra as iwi. For at least six centuries the island was a base for Maori gardening and fishing. Subsequent activity includes farming from 1840 and a destination for picnic excursions, both continuing to the present day The archaeological landscape of the island is outstanding because of its completeness and intactness. The island has a wide range of site types including some that are rare in the Auckland region: archaic middens, fish traps and stone structures. Archaeological sites play a key role in preserving a record of the past, comparable in value to museums and archives.
    [Show full text]
  • The Lost World of Fossil Lake
    Snapshots from Deep Time THE LOST WORLD of FOSSIL LAKE lance grande With photography by Lance Grande and John Weinstein The University of Chicago Press | Chicago and London Ray-Finned Fishes ( Superclass Actinopterygii) The vast majority of fossils that have been mined from the FBM over the last century and a half have been fossil ray-finned fishes, or actinopterygians. Literally millions of complete fossil ray-finned fish skeletons have been excavated from the FBM, the majority of which have been recovered in the last 30 years because of a post- 1970s boom in the number of commercial fossil operations. Almost all vertebrate fossils in the FBM are actinopterygian fishes, with perhaps 1 out of 2,500 being a stingray and 1 out of every 5,000 to 10,000 being a tetrapod. Some actinopterygian groups are still poorly understood be- cause of their great diversity. One such group is the spiny-rayed suborder Percoidei with over 3,200 living species (including perch, bass, sunfishes, and thousands of other species with pointed spines in their fins). Until the living percoid species are better known, ac- curate classification of the FBM percoids (†Mioplosus, †Priscacara, †Hypsiprisca, and undescribed percoid genera) will be unsatisfac- tory. 107 Length measurements given here for actinopterygians were made from the tip of the snout to the very end of the tail fin (= total length). The FBM actinop- terygian fishes presented below are as follows: Paddlefishes (Order Acipenseriformes, Family Polyodontidae) Paddlefishes are relatively rare in the FBM, represented by the species †Cros- sopholis magnicaudatus (fig. 48). †Crossopholis has a very long snout region, or “paddle.” Living paddlefishes are sometimes called “spoonbills,” “spoonies,” or even “spoonbill catfish.” The last of those common names is misleading because paddlefishes are not closely related to catfishes and are instead close relatives of sturgeons.
    [Show full text]
  • Papatoetoe Heritage Survey 2014
    Papatoetoe Historic Heritage Survey Survey Report 2014 Cover image: Toetoe, Roscommon Road, Papatoetoe Auckland Council, 2014 Recommended citation: Auckland Council Heritage Unit (2014). Papatoetoe Historic Heritage Survey: Survey Report. Auckland Council. © 2014 Auckland Council This publication is provided strictly subject to Auckland Council’s copyright and other intellectual property rights (if any) in the publication. Users of the publication may only access, reproduce and use the publication, in a secure digital medium or hard copy, for responsible genuine non-commercial purposes relating to personal, public service or educational purposes, provided that the publication is only ever accurately reproduced and proper attribution of its source, publication date and authorship is attached to any use or reproduction. This publication must not be used in any way for any commercial purpose without the prior written consent of Auckland Council. Auckland Council does not give any warranty whatsoever, including without limitation, as to the availability, accuracy, completeness, currency or reliability of the information or data (including third party data) made available via the publication and expressly disclaim (to the maximum extent permitted in law) all liability for any damage or loss resulting from your use of, or reliance on the publication or the information and data provided via the publication. The publication, information, and data contained within it are provided on an "as is" basis. Papatoetoe Historic Heritage Survey TABLE OF
    [Show full text]
  • Age of the Auckland Volcanic Field Jan Lindsay and Graham Leonard
    Age of the Auckland Volcanic Field Jan Lindsay and Graham Leonard IESE Report 1-2009.02 | June 2009 ISBN: [print] 978-0-473-15316-8 [PDF] 978-0-473-15416-5 Age of the Auckland Volcanic Field Jan Lindsay1 and Graham Leonard2 1School of Environment & Institute of Earth Science and Engineering, The University of Auckland, Private Bag 92019, Auckland, New Zealand; [email protected] 2GNS Science, PO Box 30368, Lower Hutt 5040 New Zealand; [email protected] IESE Report 1-2009.02 | June 2009 ISBN: [print] 978-0-473-15316-8 [PDF] 978-0-473-15416-5 This report was prepared by IESE as part of the DEVORA Project. Disclaimer: While the information contained in this report is believed to be correct at the time of publication, the Institute of Earth Science and Engineering and its working parties and agents involved in preparation and publication, do not accept any liability for its contents or for any consequences arising from its use. Copyright: This work is copyright of the Institute of Earth Science and Engineering. The content may be used with acknowledgement to the Institute of Earth Science and Engineering and the appropriate citation. TABLE OF CONTENTS INTRODUCTION .......................................................................................................................... 2 Project objectives ..................................................................................................................... 2 Methodology ............................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Technical Report 7: Landscape Assessment
    Technical Report 7: Landscape Assessment Document History and Status Revision Date Reviewed by Status 21.02.2019 R Pryor Draft 27.02.019 For Issue File Number/Name 18740 LVA01 Author J Hogan Client Euroclass Services Ltd 1.0 INTRODUCTION 1.1 LA4 Landscape Architects have been engaged by Euroclass Services Ltd to undertake a landscape assessment of Outstanding Natural Feature 93 (ONF 93) to inform a Private Plan Change request to the Auckland Unitary Plan (Operative in part) (AUPOP). As part of the plan change, Euroclass Services Ltd seeks to: § rezone the existing quarry zoning associated with the Stonehill Business Park under the AUPOP to Business - Heavy Industry § remove the ONF classification from the southern part of the plan change area that generally corresponds to the site at 79 McLaughlins Road (refer to Figure 1), as this is considered to be erroneous. Figure 1. The Site and Plan Change Area In Relation to ONF93 Source: Babbage 1.2 The scope of this assessment includes: § a description of the site and setting § a review of the landscape assessment of ONF 93 undertaken as part of Landscape Evaluations of Geological Sites and Landforms of Auckland and the Identification of Outstanding Natural Features, which was prepared in 2012 and used to inform AUPOP § an assessment of the landscape values of the portion of the PC area currently located within ONF 93 27.02.2019 2 LA4 LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTS § conclusions as to the applicability of the ONF classifications locally and in particular to the site at 79 McLaughlins Road. 1.3 I am very familiar with the site and surrounds having previously prepared a landscape and visual assessment as part of the consenting stage for the nearby Auckland South Corrections Facility, as well as being the lead landscape architect involved in the landscape design and supervision of landscape works associated with the prison.
    [Show full text]