DOCSLIB.ORG

C94) and Lower Moon River Conservation Reserve (C90

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

Moon River Conservation Reserve (C94) and Lower Moon River Conservation Reserve (C90) Statement of Conservation Interest March 2005 Moon River Conservation Reserve (C94) and Lower Moon River Conservation Reserve (C90) Statement of Conservation Interest Ministry of Natural Resources Parry Sound District Prepared with the assistance of: Meteek & Company Huntsville, Ontario March 2005 i Approval Statement We are pleased to approve this Statement of Conservation Interest for Moon River Conservation Reserve (C94) and Lower Moon River Conservation Reserve (C90). Together these two conservation reserves provide protection for approximately 15 kilometres of diverse habitats along the Moon River, from just west of Highway 400 (formerly Highway 69) to Arnolds Bay and The Massasauga Provincial Park on the Georgian Bay shoreline. Moon River Conservation Reserve (C94) is the upstream component of these two protected areas. It consists of 457 hectares of Crown land, located in southern Freeman Ward in the Area Municipality of Georgian Bay, in the District of Muskoka. The site is approximately seven kilometres southwest of the hamlet of Mactier. At its closest point on the east it is about ½ kilometre west of Highway 400, and it abuts Lower Moon River Conservation Reserve at its west boundary. This conservation reserve, located in Hills’ ecological Site District 5E-7, includes steep rocky slopes and low cliffs on the Moon River. The surrounding uplands support representative sugar maple and old hemlock forests growing on gently sloping hills with shallow sandy soils or bare bedrock. It provides habitat for the nationally threatened eastern Massasauga rattlesnake and the threatened eastern hog- nosed snake. Lower Moon River Conservation Reserve (C90) is a 2723 hectare area of Crown land, located about 10 kilometres due west of the hamlet of Mactier. The northern portions are in Conger Ward in the Township of The Archipelago in the Territorial District of Parry Sound. The southern portions are in Freeman Ward in the Area Municipality of Georgian Bay in the District Municipality of Muskoka. The northern boundary of this conservation reserve extends to the south shores of Healey Lake. To the southeast, it abuts Moon River Conservation Reserve, and to the west, it is within ½ kilometre of The Massasauga Provincial Park. Lower Moon River Conservation Reserve, also located in Hills’ ecological Site District 5E-7, contains a scenic portion of the Moon River between Curtain Chute and Moon Falls, and a large area of upland forests. The southern portions of the conservation reserve, in the vicinity of the Moon River, have been identified as a Muskoka Heritage Area. This area contains a variety of low cliff, bedrock slope and talus slope habitats and diverse shoreline flora, typical of the Georgian Bay landscape. The shoreline contains spawning habitat for muskellunge and walleye. This site protects numerous nationally and provincially rare wildlife and plants. Moon River Conservation Reserve and Lower Moon River Conservation Reserve are two of 378 new protected areas approved through Ontario’s Living Legacy Land Use Strategy, aimed, in part, at completing Ontario’s system of parks and protected areas. They are part of the Great Lakes Heritage Coast, a signature site identified through Ontario’s Living Legacy Land Use Strategy. The Great Lakes Heritage Coast is designed to protect the coastal environment and provide for recreational and tourism opportunities associated with the natural environment. These conservation reserves are within the Georgian Bay Littoral Biosphere Reserve, which was recently designated by the United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization. This designation “represents a common vision of sustainable development and environmental and cultural conservation” by a wide range of stakeholders of the area (UNESCO, 2004). During the “Lands for Life” planning process, the public was widely consulted and provided valuable input into what became Ontario’s Living Legacy Land Use Strategy. Comments received during that time and during consultation related to the formal Public Lands Act regulation of the boundaries of these conservation reserves, were generally supportive of the protection of these areas. Stakeholders who provided comment during the earlier consultation for these sites were subsequently consulted regarding the draft Statement of Conservation Interest and any comments were considered in the finalization of this document. This Statement of Conservation Interest provides guidance for the management of the two conservation reserves and provides the basis for the ongoing monitoring of activities. More detailed direction is not anticipated at this time. Should more complex resource management or conservation issues arise or ii significant facility development be considered, then a detailed Resource Management Plan will be prepared with full public consultation. Moon River Conservation Reserve and Lower Moon River Conservation Reserve are managed under the direction of the District Manager and the Parry Sound Area Supervisor of the Ministry of Natural Resources, Parry Sound District. Approved by: R. Griffiths Approved by: Ron Running District Manager Regional Director Parry Sound District Southern Region iii Table of Contents APPROVAL STATEMENT.................................................................................................................................. II 1.0 INTRODUCTION ...................................................................................................................................... 4 1.1 BACKGROUND INFORMATION: .................................................................................................................... 5 1.2 REPRESENTATION..................................................................................................................................... 5 1.3 SURVEY WORK ......................................................................................................................................... 6 2.0 VALUES TO BE PROTECTED................................................................................................................ 7 2.1 EARTH SCIENCE: ...................................................................................................................................... 7 2.2 LIFE SCIENCE: .......................................................................................................................................... 8 2.3 CULTURAL VALUES: ................................................................................................................................ 15 2.4 RECREATIONAL/AESTHETIC VALUES: ....................................................................................................... 15 3.0 MANAGEMENT GUIDELINES .............................................................................................................. 16 3.1 LAND TENURE:........................................................................................................................................ 16 3.2 DEVELOPMENT:....................................................................................................................................... 18 3.3 RECREATIONAL ACTIVITIES:..................................................................................................................... 19 3.4 COMMERCIAL ACTIVITIES:........................................................................................................................ 20 3.5 ABORIGINAL INTERESTS: ......................................................................................................................... 21 3.6 NATURAL RESOURCE STEWARDSHIP:....................................................................................................... 21 3.7 CULTURAL RESOURCE STEWARDSHIP:..................................................................................................... 22 3.8 CLIENT SERVICES: .................................................................................................................................. 23 3.9 RESEARCH: ............................................................................................................................................ 23 3.10 MARKETING: ........................................................................................................................................... 23 4.0 IMPLEMENTATION ............................................................................................................................... 24 5.0 REVIEW AND REVISION OF THE STATEMENT OF CONSERVATION INTEREST.......................... 24 6.0 REFERENCES ....................................................................................................................................... 25 APPENDICES ................................................................................................................................................... 27 APPENDIX 1 PROCEDURAL GUIDELINE B – LAND USES – TEST OF COMPATIBILITY ........................................... 27 APPENDIX 2 INDICATOR USES FOR CONSERVATION RESERVES:...................................................................... 28 APPENDIX 3 PROCEDURAL GUIDELINE C........................................................................................................ 30 APPENDIX 4 RECREATION CAMP TENURE ...................................................................................................... 31 Table of Figures
Recommended publications
  • 1003 Moon River Road, Bala Commercial Properties for Lease

    1003 Moon River Road, Bala Commercial Properties for Lease

    1003 MOON RIVER ROAD, BALA COMMERCIAL PROPERTIES FOR LEASE 3.2 ACRE SITE WITH 8,900 SQ. FT. SHOWROOM/RETAIL SHOP AND FREESTANDING 20,000 SQ. FT. STORAGE WAREHOUSE Located on Moon River Road, just off Highway 169 in Bala INQUIRIES Michael J. Saperia Martin Scott Senior Vice President, Broker Sales Representative 416 636 8898 x229 416 636 8898 x239 [email protected] [email protected] Ron Fehler Sales Representative 416 636 8898 x235 CAPITAL MARKETS [email protected] 1003 MOON RIVER ROAD, BALA COMMERCIAL PROPERTIES FOR LEASE PROPERTY OVERVIEW • The subject property is a unique 3.2-acre site at 1003 Moon River Road in Bala, Ontario • 15 minutes access to Highway 400 with direct connection to Trans Canada Highway (Highway 401) • Close proximity to two municipal airports • Site is 1 hour and 45 minutes to the GTA • Site is improved with an 8,900 sq. ft. showroom/retail shop and a freestanding 20,000 sq. ft. storage warehouse • Bala is the gateway to Muskoka, and internationally recognized as one of the finest resort areas in Canada. This highly visible property fronts directly onto Highway 169 and is one of the main arteries into the Muskoka Lakes area, the largest and wealthiest recreational community in Ontario • Muskoka Lakes is home to many high net-worth families from all over North America, including an ever- increasing presence of Hollywood celebrities, musicians and sports stars who are attracted to the spectacular scenery and pristine lakes and rivers • Bounded by Huntsville to the North, Gravenhurst to the South, Georgian Bay to the West, and Bracebridge to the East, it is a one-hour, 45 minute drive from Toronto, and is the primary access point to the breathtaking Lakes Muskoka, Rosseau and Joseph • Muskoka Lakes has a permanent growing population of over 6,500, ballooning seasonally to over 33,000.
  • MOON RIVER Grades SUBWATERSHED Land: a Water: a Wetland: —

    MOON RIVER Grades SUBWATERSHED Land: a Water: a Wetland: —

    MOON RIVER Grades SUBWATERSHED Land: A Water: A Wetland: — The Moon River subwatershed is 71,434 hectares in area and is located in the western portion of The District Municipality of Muskoka, flowing from Lake Muskoka at Bala in the Township of Muskoka Lakes westerly through both the Moon and Musquash Index Map Rivers in the Township of Georgian Bay and finally emptying into Georgian Bay. Less that 5% of the subwatershed is developed with 49% of the land through which the river flows being Crown land. There are no major urban areas within the subwatershed and shoreline residential development comprises most of the land use. 17% of the subwatershed is protected through provincial parks, crown nature reserves, or local land trusts. There are 37 lakes in the subwatershed that are 8 hectares or greater. The subwatershed is divided into two distinct reaches: the Moon River and Musquash River branches. There are 2 dams at Bala with power generation at the Burgess Dam site. On the Moon River there is one dam with no power generation. The river is approximately 35 kilometers in length. The Musquash River is approximately 30 kilometers in length and there are two dams with power generation: Big Eddy and Ragged Rapids. There are automatic water level gauges downstream from the Big Eddy Dam and at both dams in Bala. There are also flow gauges on both the Moon and Musquash Rivers and one located upstream from the point at which the rivers separate. This report card describes the health of the land, water and wetlands of the Moon River subwatershed and is part of the larger report The 2010 Muskoka Watershed Report Card that is posted on the MWC website www.muskokaheritage.org/watershed.
  • Somerset Island, Sans Souci Georgian Bay, Ontario, Canada Island B-195, Pcl 566 S/S Township of the Archipelago (Conger), District of Parry Sound

    Somerset Island, Sans Souci Georgian Bay, Ontario, Canada Island B-195, Pcl 566 S/S Township of the Archipelago (Conger), District of Parry Sound

    SOMERSET ISLAND, SANS SOUCI GEORGIAN BAY, ONTARIO, CANADA ISLAND B-195, PCL 566 S/S TOWNSHIP OF THE ARCHIPELAGO (CONGER), DISTRICT OF PARRY SOUND LEGAL DESCRIPTION: ISLAND B-195, PCL 566 S/S. TOWNSHIP OF THE ARCHIPELAGO (CONGER), DISTRICT OF PARRY SOUND REGION: CANADA LOCATION: GEORGIAN BAY SIZE: 20 ACRES, APPROX. 4,500 SQ. FT., 17 ROOMS AGE: 51+ YEARS OWNER: PAUL MICHAEL TRUST, PMT XII LLC ZONING: R02 GEORGIAN BAY NAME • Georgian Bay was charted by Captain Henry W. Bayfield of the Royal Navy in 1822, he named the area after King George IV. The area of Georgian Bay located in the District of Muskoka was formed on January 1st, 1971 due to the amalgamation of several regional governments. The District of Muskoka portion of Georgian Bay includes many of the tens of thousands of islands that dot the uneven shoreline. In 1991 there were 2,069 permanent residence and 14,238 seasonal. • Imagine being in a position to choose virtually any island in Sans Souci at the turn of the 20th century! In 1902 a railroad Baron from Cleveland purchased Somerset Island from the Crown as it was one of the grand islands of the area. One hundred years later, it remains eminently clear why he made Somerset his choice. Comprising more than 20 acres, with two natural harbours, densely covered in original growth white pine and a completely unobstructed view to the west. • Comprising a total of 20 acres, Somerset is actually two distinct sections of land joined by a low lying rock cleft. The island’s present zoning designation of R2 would allow for a severance essentially creating roughly a 12 and an 8 acre parcel.
  • Club Activities

    Club Activities

    Volume 41, Number 3 March – April 2007 Club Activities Indoor: Meetings begin at 7:30 pm on the second Tuesday of the month, October to June at St. Andrew’s United Church, 89 Mountainview Road South (at Sinclair) in Georgetown unless stated otherwise. Feb. 13: Central and South America, and the Bruce Peninsula. Bev Whatmough will be giving a presentation on some of the flora and fauna, and a look at the new Bruce Peninsula Park and Fathom Five Park interpretive centre. Mar. 13: Re-introduction of Elk into Ontario. Meagan Hazell will speak about her research on the release of large ruminants into Ontario Apr. 10: Halton Natural Areas Inventory. Andrea Dunn, Conservation Halton, will be talking on the results of the Sixteen Mile Creek Monitoring Study. Andrea was the coordinator of the project. Outdoor: Trips begin at the Niagara Escarpment Commission (NEC) parking lot at Guelph and Mountainview Road, Georgetown, unless stated otherwise. If you would like to meet the group at the trip site, please speak to the trip leader for the location and directions to the starting point. Jan. 21: Burlington Waterfowl. Meet 8:00 am. In case of inclement weather, check ahead with the trip leaders, Kelly Bowen and Andrew Kellman (905) 873-7338 Feb.18: Butterfly Conservatory, Niagara Falls, Ontario. Meet at the NEC parking lot at 8:00 am, or at the conservatory at about 9:30 am. Admission is $11 for adults. This should be a great opportunity to photograph butterflies and get a winter taste of the tropics! Depending on the weather and the group’s interests we may do some birding along the Niagara River or Lake Ontario in the afternoon.
  • Results of Field Program

    Results of Field Program

    MUSKOKA HERITAGE AREAS PROGRAM A Project of the District Municipality of Muskoka and the Muskoka Heritage Foundation 10 Pine Street, Bracebridge, Ontario PIL IN3 RESULTS OF 1992 FIELD PROGRAM MUSKOKA HERITAGE AREAS PROGRAM REPORT NO. 3 RESULTS OF THE 1992 FIELD SEASON Bonnie Bergsma Ron Reid Terry Rasmussen Genevieve Taeger March 1993 The Heritage Areas Program is sponsored by the District Municipality of Muskoka and the Muskoka Heritage Foundation, with major financial support from the Ministry of Natural Resources and other agencies. TABLE OF CONTENTS: 1. PROGRAM ORGANIZATION AND FUNDING ... 1 2. METHODOLOGY FOR BIOTIC FIELD PROGRAM ... 5 3. RECOMMENDATIONS .. 15 4. TECHNICAL SUMMARY: RECOMMENDED HERITAGE AREAS .. 17 Clipsham Woods .. 18 Fawn Lake Wetland .. 23 Gray Rapids .. 29 Langmaids Island .. 35 Lower Oxtongue River .. 40 Muldrew Creek .. 46 Riley Lake North .. 51 Scarcliffe Bay .. 57 Shack Creek Wetland .. 62 Spring Creek .. 70 Tasso Creek - Upper Big East River .. 71 Walker Point - Wells Creek .. 83 Westermain Woods .. 89 5. ADDITIONAL SITES OF INTEREST Sites from previous years - 1990 .. 93 Sites from previous years - 1991 .. 97 Other sites of interest from 1992 .103 6. LITERATURE CITED .106 7. APPENDIX 1 : RARE SPECIES STATUS .108 1. PROGRAM ORGANIZATION AND FUNDING: The Muskoka Heritage Areas Program was established to identify the best examples of the District's natural and cultural heritage, using a systematic, 6bjective evaluation process, and to seek mechanisms for the protection of these heritage landscapes. 1992 was the third year of a planned three-year program, with field activities relating to natural heritage features, both biotic and scenic. Evaluation of cultural heritage also began in 1992.
  • STATUS of WALLEYE in the GREAT LAKES: CASE STUDIES PREPARED for the 1989 WORKSHOP Edited by Peter J

    STATUS of WALLEYE in the GREAT LAKES: CASE STUDIES PREPARED for the 1989 WORKSHOP Edited by Peter J

    STATUS OF WALLEYE IN THE GREAT LAKES: CASE STUDIES PREPARED FOR THE 1989 WORKSHOP edited by Peter J. Colby Ministry of Natural Resources Fisheries Research Section, Walleye Unit 435 S. James Street P.O. Pox 5000 Thunder Day, Ontario, Canada P7C 5G6 Cheryl A. Lewis Ministry of Natural Resources Glenora Fisheries Station R. R. #4 Picton, Ontario, Canada KOK 2T0 Randy L. Eshenroder Great Lakes Fishery Commission 1451 Green Road Ann Arbor, MI 48105-2898 Citation (general): Colby, P. J., C. A. Lewis, and R. L. Eshenroder, [ED.]. 1991. Status of walleye in the Great Lakes: case studies prepared for the 1989 workshop. Great Lakes Fish. Comm. Spec. Pub. 91-l. 222 p. Citation (example for individual paper): Schram, S. T., J. R. Atkinson, and D. L. Pereira. 1991. Lake Superior walleye stocks : status and management, p. l-22. In P. J. Colby, C. A. Lewis, and R. L. Eshenroder [ed.]. Status of walleye in the Great Lakes: case studies prepared for the 1989 workshop. Great Lakes Fish. Comm. Spec. Pub. 91-l. Special Publication No. 91-1 GREAT LAKES FISHERY COMMISSION 1451 Green Road Ann Arbor, MI 48105 January 1991 The case studies in this publication were produced as preparatory material for the Walleye Rehabilitation Workshop held June 5-9, 1990 at the Franz-Theodore Stone Laboratory at Put-in-Ray, Ohio. This workshop was sponsored by the Great Lakes Fishery Commission's Board of Technical Experts. For a number of years, Henry H. Regier had urged the Board to initiate such a study to document recent changes in walleye populations that were particularly evident inwestern Lake Erie.
  • Key River Walleye Spawning Bed Rehabilitation Summary Report

    Key River Walleye Spawning Bed Rehabilitation Summary Report

    Key River Walleye Spawning Bed Rehabilitation Summary Report January 2015 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Monitoring data has assessed the Key River Walleye stock as severely stressed, and anecdotal information has documented that fewer Walleye have been spawning in the Key River, and there has been a dramatic decrease in the number of eggs deposited at the spawning areas. In September 2015, two spawning beds on the upper reach of the Key River in Eastern Georgian Bay were enhanced for Walleye spawning and egg incubation. In order to provide greater access to spawning areas over a historic range of Georgian Bay water levels, new habitat was created at both sites using river rock and large boulders to make the spawning areas larger and more varied in depth. Approximately 250 square metres of new habitat was created at the lower spawning site, and 150 square metres created at the upper spawning site, totalling approximately 400 square metres of new habitat created. One hundred and sixty tons of river rock and 54 tons of boulder were used in the rehabilitation project. Contents EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ...................................................................................................................................... 2 SITE LOCATION ................................................................................................................................................ 4 SITE HISTORY .................................................................................................................................................. 4 PROJECT
  • Letter of Appeal

    Letter of Appeal

    April 11, 2011 The Honourable John Wilkinson Minister of the Environment 77 Wellesley Street West Ferguson Block 11th Floor Toronto, ON M7A 2T5 Dear Minister Wilkinson, Re: Request for Minister’s Review of Director’s Decision that an Individual Environmental Assessment is Not Required for the Proposed North Bala Falls Hydro-electric Generating Station The Moon River Property Owners Association (MRPOA) has 256 members who are property owners along the shores of the Moon River in The Township of Muskoka Lakes. There are over 300 properties on the river and our association clearly represents the majority of those owners. Of our membership, 86% have indicated their opposition to the proposal brought forward by the proponent, Swift River Energy Limited Partnership (SREL). MRPOA members have asked MRPOA to represent them vigorously in these matters. Before proceeding further, here is very small example of what Bala is about. For a clear view of what Bala and the site of the proposed development, please refer to Picture 1. Our members, many of whom wrote to the Ministry of the Environment (MoE) requesting an elevation to an individual environmental assessment, are very disappointed that the Assessment Review Branch has ignored their requests. Our members feel this project should not be permitted in any form. What follows will be a detailed analysis of the Director’s decision. I will also point out why, in my opinion and in the opinion of our members, we believe that, at a minimum, the proponent should be required to undertake an “Individual Environmental Assessment”. Public Consultation It is our opinion that inadequate public consultation on this project has taken place.
  • Torrance Barrens Conservation Reserve

    Torrance Barrens Conservation Reserve

    Torrance Barrens Conservation Reserve (Dark Sky Reserve) Statement of Conservation Interest February, 2006 Torrance Barrens Conservation Reserve (Dark Sky Reserve) Statement of Conservation Interest Ministry of Natural Resources Parry Sound District Prepared with the assistance of: Meteek & Company Huntsville, Ontario February, 2006 i Table of Contents APPROVAL STATEMENT.................................................................................................................................. II 1.0 INTRODUCTION ...................................................................................................................................... 3 1.1 BACKGROUND INFORMATION:........................................................................................................................ 4 1.2 REPRESENTATION: ....................................................................................................................................... 4 1.3 SURVEY WORK: ........................................................................................................................................... 5 2.0 VALUES TO BE PROTECTED................................................................................................................ 6 2.1 EARTH SCIENCE:.......................................................................................................................................... 6 2.2 LIFE SCIENCE:.............................................................................................................................................
  • Henvey Inlet Wind Appendix

    Henvey Inlet Wind Appendix

    Henvey Inlet Wind LP Henvey Inlet Wind Transmission Line Appendix B9. Route A Cultural Heritage Assessment Report Henvey Inlet Wind LP Henvey Inlet Wind Cultural Heritage Assessment Report Transmission Line – Route A Unorganized Townships of Mowat, and Blair, District of Parry Sound, Ontario Prepared by: AECOM 410 – 250 York Street, Citi Plaza 519 673 0510 tel London, ON, Canada N6A 6K2 519 673 5975 fax www.aecom.com Project Number: 60341251 Date: August 2015 Henvey Inlet Wind LP Henvey Inlet Wind Cultural Heritage Assessment Report Transmission Line – Route A Statement of Qualifications and Limitations The attached Report (the “Report”) has been prepared by AECOM Canada Ltd. (“Consultant”) for the benefit of the client (“Client”) in accordance with the agreement between Consultant and Client, including the scope of work detailed therein (the “Agreement”). The information, data, recommendations and conclusions contained in the Report (collectively, the “Information”): is subject to the scope, schedule, and other constraints and limitations in the Agreement and the qualifications contained in the Report (the “Limitations”); represents Consultant’s professional judgement in light of the Limitations and industry standards for the preparation of similar reports; may be based on information provided to Consultant which has not been independently verified; has not been updated since the date of issuance of the Report and its accuracy is limited to the time period and circumstances in which it was collected, processed, made or issued; must be read as a whole and sections thereof should not be read out of such context; was prepared for the specific purposes described in the Report and the Agreement; and in the case of subsurface, environmental or geotechnical conditions, may be based on limited testing and on the assumption that such conditions are uniform and not variable either geographically or over time.
  • 2019 Lake Huron Lake Sturgeon Working Group Report

    2019 Lake Huron Lake Sturgeon Working Group Report

    This document is intended to provide an update regarding lake sturgeon activities within the Lake Huron basin. Please contact the agency leads listed for more information about a specific project. 2019 Lake Huron Sturgeon Working Group Report Prepared by members: Justin Chiotti (Chair) U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service – Alpena FWCO Dave Borgeson Michigan Department of Natural Resources Lori Criger U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service – Marquette Biological Station Chris Davis Ontario Ministry of Natural Resources and Forestry Paul Ripple Bay Mills Indian Community Jason Smith Little Traverse Bay Bands of Odawa Indians Brad Silet Sault Tribe of Chippewa Indians J. Barry Weldon Little River Band of Ottawa Indians Erik Olsen Grand Traverse Bay Band of Chippewa Indians And non‐members: Russell Aikens Sault Tribe of Chippewa Indians Ed Baker Michigan Department of Natural Resources Andrew Briggs Michigan Department of Natural Resources Stephen Chong Ontario Ministry of Natural Resources and Forestry Kris Dey Little Traverse Bay Bands of Odawa Indians Rich Drouin Ontario Ministry of Natural Resources and Forestry Dave Fielder Michigan Department of Natural Resources Christopher Holbrook U.S. Geological Survey – Great Lakes Science Center Darryl Hondorp U.S. Geological Survey – Great Lakes Science Center Kevin Kapuscinski Lake Superior State University Jeffrey Jolley Michigan Department of Natural Resources Amber Johnston Michigan State University Doug Larson Department of Fisheries and Wildlife – Michigan State University Thomas P. Loch Michigan State University Lisa O’Connor Fisheries and Oceans Canada Ed Roseman U.S. Geological Survey – Great Lakes Science Center Kim Scribner Department of Fisheries and Wildlife – Michigan State University Esteban Soto University of California‐Davis Jeff Speers Ontario Ministry of Natural Resources and Forestry Lexi Sumner Anishinabek/Ontario Fisheries Resource Center Frank Zomer Bay Mills Indian Community Location: Southern Lake Huron and Upper St.
  • Regulation Plan Map of Fisheries Management Zone 14

    Regulation Plan Map of Fisheries Management Zone 14

    Statutory Order and Regulation / Decrets, Ministry of LEGEND NOTES: ordonnances et reglements statutaires No. _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ Natural 1. Map projection, grid, and coordinates are in UTM NAD 83 Zone 17, unless SCHEDULE No. _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ Wetland Area, Permanent Ontario Resources Digital Mapping Transportation FMZ Boundary otherwise noted. 2. Survey instructions from the Surveyor General must be obtained prior to Geographic Provincial Park & Crown establishing any of the boundaries on the ground. CERTIFICATE OF SURVEYOR GENERAL DATE COMPLETED _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ Waterways Townships Game Preserve 3. "C/L OF ROAD" means the centreline of the pavement/gravel or the SHEET 1 OF 17 I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN HAS BEEN FILED centreline of the median where the highway is divided. Railway Lakes 4. "C/L OF RAILWAY" denotes the centreline of all tracks where tracks exist or WITH THE OFFICE OF THE SURVEYOR GENERAL OF the centreline of bed where no tracks exist. 0 1020304050 Regulation Plan of Fisheries ONTARIO IN THE MINISTRY OF NATURAL RESOURCES This plan was compiled from data sets supplied by the Land 5. Where necessary all limits are extended unless otherwise noted. ON THE DAY OF Information Ontario (LIO) Warehouse, Ontario Roads Network and 6. Where a Fisheries Management Zone limit crosses a body of water along a road FMZ other information of record in the Ministry of Natural Resources.