STATUS of WALLEYE in the GREAT LAKES: CASE STUDIES PREPARED for the 1989 WORKSHOP Edited by Peter J

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

STATUS of WALLEYE in the GREAT LAKES: CASE STUDIES PREPARED for the 1989 WORKSHOP Edited by Peter J STATUS OF WALLEYE IN THE GREAT LAKES: CASE STUDIES PREPARED FOR THE 1989 WORKSHOP edited by Peter J. Colby Ministry of Natural Resources Fisheries Research Section, Walleye Unit 435 S. James Street P.O. Pox 5000 Thunder Day, Ontario, Canada P7C 5G6 Cheryl A. Lewis Ministry of Natural Resources Glenora Fisheries Station R. R. #4 Picton, Ontario, Canada KOK 2T0 Randy L. Eshenroder Great Lakes Fishery Commission 1451 Green Road Ann Arbor, MI 48105-2898 Citation (general): Colby, P. J., C. A. Lewis, and R. L. Eshenroder, [ED.]. 1991. Status of walleye in the Great Lakes: case studies prepared for the 1989 workshop. Great Lakes Fish. Comm. Spec. Pub. 91-l. 222 p. Citation (example for individual paper): Schram, S. T., J. R. Atkinson, and D. L. Pereira. 1991. Lake Superior walleye stocks : status and management, p. l-22. In P. J. Colby, C. A. Lewis, and R. L. Eshenroder [ed.]. Status of walleye in the Great Lakes: case studies prepared for the 1989 workshop. Great Lakes Fish. Comm. Spec. Pub. 91-l. Special Publication No. 91-1 GREAT LAKES FISHERY COMMISSION 1451 Green Road Ann Arbor, MI 48105 January 1991 The case studies in this publication were produced as preparatory material for the Walleye Rehabilitation Workshop held June 5-9, 1990 at the Franz-Theodore Stone Laboratory at Put-in-Ray, Ohio. This workshop was sponsored by the Great Lakes Fishery Commission's Board of Technical Experts. For a number of years, Henry H. Regier had urged the Board to initiate such a study to document recent changes in walleye populations that were particularly evident inwestern Lake Erie. A broad examination of walleye population changes in the Great Lakes was last undertaken at the Percid International Symposium held in 1976, and an update was very desirable. Peter Colby graciously agreed to chair the workshop for the Board and gratefully acknowledges the support of the steering committee: Carl Raker, Robert Haas, Joseph Koonce, Cheryl Lewis, Kenneth Mimms, and Terry Lychwick. Also very noteworthy were the contributions of Special Editor Wilbur Hartman and Associate Editor Gail Etter. R. L. Eshenroder December 6, 1990 Lake Superior Walleye Stocks: Status and Management, by S. T. Schram, J. R. Atkinson, and D. L. Pereira . 1 Walleye Rehabilitation in Lake Michigan, 1969-1989, by J. C. Schneider, T. J. Lychwick, E. J. Trimberger, J. H. Peterson, R. O'Neal, and P. J. Schneeberger.......................23 Rehabilitation of Walleye in Saginaw Bay, Lake Huron, by L. E. Mrozinski, J. C. Schneider, R. C. Haas, and R. E. Shepherd . 63 The Present (1989) Status of Walleye Stocks in Georgian Bay, North Channel, and Canadian Waters of Southern Lake Huron, by J. A. Reckahn and L. W. D. Thurston..................85 Walleye in Lake Erie and Lake St. Clair, by S. J. Nepszy, D. H. Davies, D. Einhouse, R. W. Hatch, G. Isbell, D. MacLennan and K. M. Muth.........................................145 The Resurgence of Walleye in Lake Ontario, by J. N. Bowlby, A. Mathers, D. A. Hurley, and T. H. Eckert.......................................169 References . 207 LAKE SUPERIOR WALLEYE STOCKS: STATUS AND MANAGEMENT S. T. Schram Wisconsin Department of Natural Resources P.O. Box 589 Dayfield, WI 54814 J. R. Atkinson Ontario Ministry of Natural Resources Fisheries Branch, Thunder Bay. Ontario, CANADA P7C 5G6 D. L. Pereira Department of Fish and Wildlife University of Minnesota, St. Paul, MN 55108 ABSTRACT. This paper describes the current status of walleye (Stizostedion vitreum vitreum) stocks in Lake Superior. Although Lake Superior is oligotrophic with a fisheries comprised primarily of cold-water species, walleye have played an important role in shallow-water areas and embayments. The western Lake Superior stock was lightly exploited until dramatic water quality improvements occurred in 1979. The stock now supports a popular sport fishery in both Wisconsin and Minnesota. The slow growth of this stock may make it extremely vulnerable to overexploitation. Other Wisconsin stocks are found in Kakagon Slough and the Bad River. Both stocks support sport and tribal fisheries and the use of supplemental stocking is being investigated. The three large stocks historically in Ontario waters include Nipigon Bay, Black Bay, and Whitefish Bay. All stocks are depressed and stocking is being used for rehabilitation. Overfishingwas identified as the primary reason for declining Lake Superior walleye abundance. Several potential, but undocumented, adverse impacts from exotic species are noted. Contaminant levels on largerwalleye have exceeded recommended consumption guidelines in several areas. Managers attempting to rehabilitate walleye stocks will have to determine basic population characteristics and identify sources of stress before developing a management plan. INTRODUCTION This paper reports on the current status of major walleye (Stizostedion vitreum vitreum) stocks in Lake Superior (Fig. 1). Lake Superior is classified as oligotrophic due to its low productivity and the glacial characteristics of its drainage basin (Lawrie and Rahrer 1972; Matheson and Munawar 1978). Among the Great Lakes, Lake Superior has the lowest summer surface temperature and mean annual lake temperature (Bennett 1978). Native fish are comprised primarily of cold-water species: 1) lake trout (Salvelinus namaycush), 2) lake herring, (Coregonus artedii), and 3) lake whitefish, (Coregonus clupeaformis). This community was severely depleted by the stresses of exploitation, exotic species, and habitat degradation (Lawrie 1978). Walleye and other cool-water species better adapted to shallow, mesotrophic systems have played an important but secondary role, both ecologically and in sport and commercial fisheries (Ryder 1968; Lawrie and Rahrer 1972). Walleye were historically harvested in shallow-water areas and discrete embayments (Nutte 1944; Ryder 1968; Pereira et al., Minnesota DNR, unpubl. data; Schram et al., Wisconsin DNR, unpubl. data). Maximum commercial harvests from U.S. waters were 56,000 kg obtained in Minnesota in 1885, and 170,000 kg from Ontario waters in 1966 (Fig. 2) (Baldwin et al. 1979). Lack of data on most Lake Superior walleye stocks limit analysis of stock problems. Some problems have been documented with biological data, while others are the opinion of local managers. The decline of stocks in Black Bay (Ontario) and in Michigan's waters were believed to be due primarily to overharvest (Schneider and Leach 1977; Colby and Nepszy 1981). Pollution and/or overexploitation played a major role in the decimation of the walleye in Nipigon Bay (Ryder 1968; MacCallum and Selgeby 1987). Exotic species such as rainbow smelt (Osmerus mordax) and sea lamprey (Petromyzon marinus) are present, but any adverse impact is unknown (Schneider and Leach 1977). Fig. 2. Lake Superior commercial walleye production, 1868- 1977 (Baldwin et al. 1979). STOCK INFORMATION Minnesota Minnesota shares a small walleye population in the Pigeon River with Ontario and shares the western lake Superior stock with Wisconsin. The Pigeon River population spawns in the Pigeon River but little else is known about its biology. In 1980, samples of fish over 394 mm exceeded the current action level for mercury as established by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration. There is a small tribal subsistence fishery on this stock (Steven Hirsch, Minnesota DNR, pers. commun.). Additional stock data were summarized by Ball (1988a). The western Lake Superior stock provides a high-quality sport fishery for anglers in the St. Louis River. This stock is discussed in detail in the Wisconsin section. Minnesota's walleye season extends from the second Saturday in May to February 15, with no size limit and a possession limit of six. Wisconsin Three walleye stocks inhabit Wisconsin waters: 1) western Lake Superior, 2) Kakagon Slough, and 3) Bad River. Each stock has experienced different levels of exploitation from sport and commercial fisheries. All stocks live primarily in Lake Superior or Chequamegon Bay and spawn in tributary streams. Commercial production during 1944-55 averaged 10,600 kg annually. Fearing overexploitation, anglers convinced the Wisconsin Conservation Commission to close the commercial fishery after 1955. In 1971, the Wisconsin Supreme Court removed control of tribal fisheries from the state to the Lake Superior Band of Chippewas. Beginning in 1972, the Bad River Band began gillnetting the spawning runs in the Kakagon Slough and Bad River. In 1980, an assessment fishery by the Red Cliff Band began on the western Lake Superior stock. Both Bands still continue their commercial and subsistence fisheries on these stocks. Contaminant monitoring has been conducted since 1970. Elevated mercury levels from walleye collected in 1984-85 prompted the issuance of a fish consumption advisory for Lake Superior and the St. Louis River. Currently, sport anglers have an open season with a daily bag limit of five, and no size limit. Western Lake Superior The western Lake Superior stock is one of the few Great Lakes walleye stocks to perpetuate over the past century. Survival is due to low exploitation rates prior to 1979. As early as 1900, water pollution in the St. Louis River from upstream paper mills had caused oxygen deficiencies and fish taste and odor problems associated with a variety of chlorophenolic products produced during the pulping process. A sport fishery occurred in the St. Louis River but harvest was limited by the water quality problems which gave fish a poor flavor. In 1978, the Western Lake Superior Sanitary District (WISSD) began treating domestic and industrial wastes from a 1,300 sq km area within the St. Louis River watershed. Much of these wastes were previously discharged into the river, including chloro-organics from upstream paper mills. Diversion of chloro-organics to WLSSD markedly improved the palatability of fish from the St. Louis River and increased angling pressure dramatically. Since 1979, the western Lake Superior stock has been subjected to increasing angler pressure. In response to a concern over possible adverse impacts from exploitation, the Wisconsin DNR initiated a comprehensive study of the western Lake Superior walleye stock in 1978 (Schram et al.
Recommended publications
  • Westbound on Sparrow Lake Route North & Southbound on Clarence
    THE CORPORATION OF THE TOWN OF GRAVENHURST BY-LAW N0. 95-148 Being a Stop Sign By-law for the Town of Gravenhurst WHEREAS Section 137 of the Highway Traffic Act, R.S.O. 1990, Chapter H.8 provides that the Council of a Municipalitymay be by-law provide for the erection of stop signs at intersections on highways under its jurisdiction; AND WHEREAS in accordance with the Highway Traffic Act, the Council of the Town of Gravenhurst passed By-law No. 88-173 on October 24th, 1988; AND WHEREAS there have been a number of amendments to By-law No. 88-173 since October, 1988; AND WHEREAS it is desirous to consolidate By-law No. 88-173 and amendments thereto; NOW THEREFORE THE COUNCIL OF THE TOWN OF GRAVENHURSTENACTS AS FOLLOWS: 1. The intersections on highways set out in Column #1 are designated as intersections where stop signs shall be erected at the locations shown in Column #2. Column £1 Column £2 Intersection Facing Traffic Alexander St. & Blanchard St.W. Southbound on Alexander St. Alexander St. & Catherine St. East & Westbound on Catherine St. Alexander St. & Evans Ave.W. East & Westbound on Evans Ave. Alexander St. & Palmer Dr. Northbound on Alexander St. Austin St.N. & Farquhar St. East & Westbound on Farquhar St. Austin St.N. & Fraser St. North & Southbound on Austin St. Austin St.N. & Lorne St. Northbound on Austin St. Austin St.N. & Wagner St. North & Southbound on Austin St. Austin St.N. & Winewood Ave.W. North on Austin St.N. Barkway Rd. & Ben Lake Rd. Eastbound on Ben Lake Rd.
    [Show full text]
  • Population in Goulais Bay, Lake Superior
    See discussions, stats, and author profiles for this publication at: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/264864682 Identification of a robust Lake Sturgeon (Acipenser fulvescens Rafinesque, 1917) population in Goulais Bay, Lake Superior Article in Journal of Applied Ichthyology · August 2014 DOI: 10.1111/jai.12566 CITATIONS READS 0 33 5 authors, including: Thomas C. Pratt Jennie Pearce Fisheries and Oceans Canada Pearce & Associates Ecological Research 49 PUBLICATIONS 489 CITATIONS 42 PUBLICATIONS 3,610 CITATIONS SEE PROFILE SEE PROFILE All content following this page was uploaded by Thomas C. Pratt on 08 April 2016. The user has requested enhancement of the downloaded file. All in-text references underlined in blue are added to the original document and are linked to publications on ResearchGate, letting you access and read them immediately. Journal of Applied Ichthyology J. Appl. Ichthyol. (2014), 1–7 Received: December 6, 2013 © 2014 Her Majesty the Queen in Right of Canada Accepted: February 24, 2014 Journal of Applied Ichthyology © 2014 Blackwell Verlag GmbH doi: 10.1111/jai.12566 ISSN 0175–8659 Identification of a robust Lake Sturgeon (Acipenser fulvescens Rafinesque, 1917) population in Goulais Bay, Lake Superior By T. C. Pratt1, W. M. Gardner1, J. Pearce2, S. Greenwood3 and S. C. Chong3 1Fisheries and Oceans Canada, Great Lakes Laboratory for Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences, Sault Ste Marie, ON, Canada; 2Pearce & Associates Ecological Research, Sault Ste Marie, ON, Canada; 3Upper Great Lakes Management Unit, Ontario Ministry of Natural Resources, Sault Ste Marie, ON, Canada Summary anthropogenic activities due to specific life history character- Lake Sturgeon (Acipenser fulvescens Rafinesque, 1917) in istics, including slow growth and late maturation, intermit- Lake Superior are greatly depressed from their historic abun- tent spawning intervals, and habitat requirements such as dance, and few populations meet the rehabilitation goals specific temperature, flow velocities and substrate require- identified by management agencies.
    [Show full text]
  • C94) and Lower Moon River Conservation Reserve (C90
    Moon River Conservation Reserve (C94) and Lower Moon River Conservation Reserve (C90) Statement of Conservation Interest March 2005 Moon River Conservation Reserve (C94) and Lower Moon River Conservation Reserve (C90) Statement of Conservation Interest Ministry of Natural Resources Parry Sound District Prepared with the assistance of: Meteek & Company Huntsville, Ontario March 2005 i Approval Statement We are pleased to approve this Statement of Conservation Interest for Moon River Conservation Reserve (C94) and Lower Moon River Conservation Reserve (C90). Together these two conservation reserves provide protection for approximately 15 kilometres of diverse habitats along the Moon River, from just west of Highway 400 (formerly Highway 69) to Arnolds Bay and The Massasauga Provincial Park on the Georgian Bay shoreline. Moon River Conservation Reserve (C94) is the upstream component of these two protected areas. It consists of 457 hectares of Crown land, located in southern Freeman Ward in the Area Municipality of Georgian Bay, in the District of Muskoka. The site is approximately seven kilometres southwest of the hamlet of Mactier. At its closest point on the east it is about ½ kilometre west of Highway 400, and it abuts Lower Moon River Conservation Reserve at its west boundary. This conservation reserve, located in Hills’ ecological Site District 5E-7, includes steep rocky slopes and low cliffs on the Moon River. The surrounding uplands support representative sugar maple and old hemlock forests growing on gently sloping hills with shallow sandy soils or bare bedrock. It provides habitat for the nationally threatened eastern Massasauga rattlesnake and the threatened eastern hog- nosed snake. Lower Moon River Conservation Reserve (C90) is a 2723 hectare area of Crown land, located about 10 kilometres due west of the hamlet of Mactier.
    [Show full text]
  • N Shore L. Superior: Geology, Scenery
    THESE TERMS GOVERN YOUR USE OF THIS DOCUMENT Your use of this Ontario Geological Survey document (the “Content”) is governed by the terms set out on this page (“Terms of Use”). By downloading this Content, you (the “User”) have accepted, and have agreed to be bound by, the Terms of Use. Content: This Content is offered by the Province of Ontario’s Ministry of Northern Development and Mines (MNDM) as a public service, on an “as-is” basis. Recommendations and statements of opinion expressed in the Content are those of the author or authors and are not to be construed as statement of government policy. You are solely responsible for your use of the Content. You should not rely on the Content for legal advice nor as authoritative in your particular circumstances. Users should verify the accuracy and applicability of any Content before acting on it. MNDM does not guarantee, or make any warranty express or implied, that the Content is current, accurate, complete or reliable. MNDM is not responsible for any damage however caused, which results, directly or indirectly, from your use of the Content. MNDM assumes no legal liability or responsibility for the Content whatsoever. Links to Other Web Sites: This Content may contain links, to Web sites that are not operated by MNDM. Linked Web sites may not be available in French. MNDM neither endorses nor assumes any responsibility for the safety, accuracy or availability of linked Web sites or the information contained on them. The linked Web sites, their operation and content are the responsibility of the person or entity for which they were created or maintained (the “Owner”).
    [Show full text]
  • CORA Code – Great Lakes Fishing Regulations
    CHIPPEWA OTTAWA RESOURCE AUTHORITY COMMERCIAL, SUBSISTENCE, AND RECREATIONAL FISHING REGULATIONS FOR THE 1836 TREATY CEDED WATERS OF LAKES SUPERIOR, HURON, AND MICHIGAN Adopted August 31, 2000 Effective September 7, 2000 Revised March 4, 2019 CHIPPEWA OTTAWA RESOURCE AUTHORITY COMMERCIAL, SUBSISTENCE, AND RECREATIONAL FISHING REGULATIONS FOR THE 1836 TREATY CEDED WATERS OF LAKES SUPERIOR, HURON, AND MICHIGAN CONTENTS PART ONE: GENERAL MATTERS PART FIVE: NON-COMMERCIAL FISHING I. Purpose……………………………………1 XVII. Recreational Fishing……………………….…28 II. Scope and Application……………………1 XVIII. Tribal Charter Boat Operations………………28 III. Definitions……………………………...1-4 XIX. Subsistence Fishing……………………….28-30 PART TWO: ZONES PART SIX: LICENSES AND INFORMATION IV. Commercial Fishing Zones………………4 XX. License and Registration Definitions and Regulations…………………………………...30 V. Tribal Zones………………………........4-8 XXI. License Regulations……………………....31-32 VI. Intertribal Zones………………………8-10 XXII. Harvest Reporting and Sampling………....32-34 VII. Trap Net Zones…………………........10-12 XXIII. Assessment Fishing……………………… 34-35 VIII. Closed or Limited Fishing Zones……12-14 PART THREE: GEAR PART SEVEN: REGULATION AND ENFORCEMENT IX. Gear Restrictions……….…………......14-17 XXIV. Tribal Regulations……………………………35 X. State-Funded Trap Net Conversion Operations……………………………17-18 XXV. Orders of the Director…………………..........35 XXVI. Jurisdiction and Enforcement…………….35-37 PART FOUR: SPECIES XXVII. Criminal Provisions………………………….37 XI. Lake Trout…………………………...18-19 XII. Salmon……………………………….19-21 PART EIGHT: ACCESS XIII. Walleye…………………………….…21-23 XXVIII. Use of Access Sites……………………..37-38 XIV. Yellow Perch………………………...23-26 XV. Other Species………………………...26-27 XVI. Prohibited Species……………………… 27 CHIPPEWA OTTAWA RESOURCE AUTHORITY COMMERCIAL, SUBSISTENCE, AND RECREATIONAL FISHING REGULATIONS FOR THE 1836 TREATY CEDED WATERS OF LAKES SUPERIOR, HURON, AND MICHIGAN PART ONE: GENERAL MATTERS SECTION I.
    [Show full text]
  • Planning Council Agenda January 24, 2017 at 5:00 PM
    Town of Gravenhurst - Planning Council Agenda January 24, 2017 at 5:00 PM Agenda Item Page No. A. Closed Session B. Adoption of Agenda Recommendation: BE IT RESOLVED THAT the Council agenda as presented on January 24, 2017 be approved as circulated/amended. C. Disclosure of Pecuniary Interest D. Public Meetings 5:00 p.m. 1. ZA 03-2016 (Pollard - Kahshe River) 4 - 9 Report No. DEV 2017-03 2. ZA 27-2016 (Brigadoon Resort Inc. - Sparrow Lake) 10 - 21 Report No. DEV 2017-04 3. ZA 32-2016 (Shrott & Shrott-McKinnon - Lake Muskoka) 22 - 27 Report No. DEV 2017-05 4. ZA 35-2016 (Stanhope Investments Ltd - Reay Road) 28 - 35 Report No. DEV 2017-06 5. ZA 36-2016 (Lague - North Muldrew Lake) 36 - 41 Report No. DEV 2017-07 6. ZA 38-2016 (Goldenberg - Lake Muskoka) 42 - 47 Report No. 2017-08 7. SRC 06-2014 (Kudlak, Robert - Riley Lake) 48 - 51 Report No. DEV 2017-12 E. Deputations F. Minor Amendment Resolutions G. Unfinished Business Town of Gravenhurst - Planning Council Date: January 24, 2017 1. ZA 32-2015 (Hopper - Sparrow Lake) 52 - 58 Report No. DEV 2017-09 H. New Business 1. Muskoka Airport - Governance Review Comments 59 - 61 Report No. DEV 2017-10 Recommendation: WHEREAS InterVISTAS Consulting has been retained to undertake a governance review of the Muskoka Airport and have reached out to the Town of Gravenhurst for formal comments; AND WHEREAS one of the purposes of a two- tiered system of government is to ensure that large ticket services, including the Muskoka Airport, are attainable and affordable; NOW BE IT RESOLVED THAT Council recommend that the Muskoka Airport remain in the ownership of the District Municipality of Muskoka; AND THAT a separate decision-making board be established to operate the airport based on a defined vision and business strategy.
    [Show full text]
  • Distances Between United States Ports 2019 (13Th) Edition
    Distances Between United States Ports 2019 (13th) Edition T OF EN CO M M T M R E A R P C E E D U N A I C T I E R D E S M T A ATES OF U.S. Department of Commerce Wilbur L. Ross, Jr., Secretary of Commerce National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) RDML Timothy Gallaudet., Ph.D., USN Ret., Assistant Secretary of Commerce for Oceans and Atmosphere and Acting Under Secretary of Commerce for Oceans and Atmosphere National Ocean Service Nicole R. LeBoeuf, Deputy Assistant Administrator for Ocean Services and Coastal Zone Management Cover image courtesy of Megan Greenaway—Great Salt Pond, Block Island, RI III Preface Distances Between United States Ports is published by the Office of Coast Survey, National Ocean Service (NOS), National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA), pursuant to the Act of 6 August 1947 (33 U.S.C. 883a and b), and the Act of 22 October 1968 (44 U.S.C. 1310). Distances Between United States Ports contains distances from a port of the United States to other ports in the United States, and from a port in the Great Lakes in the United States to Canadian ports in the Great Lakes and St. Lawrence River. Distances Between Ports, Publication 151, is published by National Geospatial-Intelligence Agency (NGA) and distributed by NOS. NGA Pub. 151 is international in scope and lists distances from foreign port to foreign port and from foreign port to major U.S. ports. The two publications, Distances Between United States Ports and Distances Between Ports, complement each other.
    [Show full text]
  • Biodiversity of Michigan's Great Lakes Islands
    FILE COPY DO NOT REMOVE Biodiversity of Michigan’s Great Lakes Islands Knowledge, Threats and Protection Judith D. Soule Conservation Research Biologist April 5, 1993 Report for: Land and Water Management Division (CZM Contract 14C-309-3) Prepared by: Michigan Natural Features Inventory Stevens T. Mason Building P.O. Box 30028 Lansing, MI 48909 (517) 3734552 1993-10 F A report of the Michigan Department of Natural Resources pursuant to National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration Award No. 309-3 BIODWERSITY OF MICHIGAN’S GREAT LAKES ISLANDS Knowledge, Threats and Protection by Judith D. Soule Conservation Research Biologist Prepared by Michigan Natural Features Inventory Fifth floor, Mason Building P.O. Box 30023 Lansing, Michigan 48909 April 5, 1993 for Michigan Department of Natural Resources Land and Water Management Division Coastal Zone Management Program Contract # 14C-309-3 CL] = CD C] t2 CL] C] CL] CD = C = CZJ C] C] C] C] C] C] .TABLE Of CONThNTS TABLE OF CONTENTS I EXECUTIVE SUMMARY iii INTRODUCTION 1 HISTORY AND PHYSICAL RESOURCES 4 Geology and post-glacial history 4 Size, isolation, and climate 6 Human history 7 BIODWERSITY OF THE ISLANDS 8 Rare animals 8 Waterfowl values 8 Other birds and fish 9 Unique plants 10 Shoreline natural communities 10 Threatened, endangered, and exemplary natural features 10 OVERVIEW OF RESEARCH ON MICHIGAN’S GREAT LAKES ISLANDS 13 Island research values 13 Examples of biological research on islands 13 Moose 13 Wolves 14 Deer 14 Colonial nesting waterbirds 14 Island biogeography studies 15 Predator-prey
    [Show full text]
  • Trent-Severn & Lake Simcoe
    MORE THAN 200 NEW LABELED AERIAL PHOTOS TRENT-SEVERN & LAKE SIMCOE Your Complete Guide to the Trent-Severn Waterway and Lake Simcoe with Full Details on Marinas and Facilities, Cities and Towns, and Things to Do! LAKE KATCHEWANOOKA LOCK 23 DETAILED MAPS OF EVERY Otonabee LOCK 22 LAKE ON THE SYSTEM dam Nassau Mills Insightful Locking and Trent University Trent Boating Tips You Need to Know University EXPANDED DINING AND OTONABEE RIVER ENTERTAINMENT GUIDE dam $37.95 ISBN 0-9780625-0-7 INCLUDES: GPS COORDINATES AND OUR FULL DISTANCE CHART 000 COVER TS2013.indd 1 13-04-10 4:18 PM ESCAPE FROM THE ORDINARY Revel and relax in the luxury of the Starport experience. Across the glistening waters of Lake Simcoe, the Trent-Severn Waterway and Georgian Bay, Starport boasts three exquisite properties, Starport Simcoe, Starport Severn Upper and Starport Severn Lower. Combining elegance and comfort with premium services and amenities, Starport creates memorable experiences that last a lifetime for our members and guests alike. SOMETHING FOR EVERYONE… As you dock your boat at Starport, step into a haven of pure tranquility. Put your mind at ease, every convenience is now right at your fi ngertips. For premium members, let your evening unwind with Starport’s turndown service. For all parents, enjoy a quiet reprieve at Starport’s on-site restaurants while your children are welcomed and entertained in the Young Captain’s Club. Starport also offers a multitude of invigorating on-shore and on-water events that you can enjoy together as a family. There truly is something for everyone.
    [Show full text]
  • Report, January 1988
    REPORT OF THE EVALUATION OF THE GREAT LAKES FISHERY COMMISSIONS'S PROGRAM OF SEA LAMPREY BARRIER DAMS JANUARY 1988 LIsTOFAPPENDICES Great Lakes Fishery Commission's Policy Statement fortheF&leofIhrrierDanrs inanInteqat&Sea Lamprey CbntmlPmgram . 31 Appendix 2 Great Lakes Fishery &mmissionts Guidelines for Barrier Dam Fxgram for Sea Lamprey Management . 35 Appendix 3 Tansof Reference for the Task Force to Assess the Sea Lamprey Barrier Dam Program . 41 Appendix 4 Map of the Great Lakes Shc&.ngLccationofSea Lanqqzy Barrier Dams . 47 Information Matrix on Sea Lamprey l%rrierlhms. 49 Photographs of Sea Lamprey Bamier Dams...... 55 Design Drawings of Sea hmprey Barrier Dams.... 73 Remrks Fresented at the Official Opening of Denny's EamIampreyE?arrierandFishway, Saugeen River, Ontario, May 21, 1971 by J.J. Tibbles . 81 Appendix 9 Inventory of E3ristiqStmchres Blocking Sea Lamprey Migrations . 87 Great Lakes Fishery &mm.ission Application for Fur&toAcquireLandand/orConstructor~ira BarrierD3mtoStopSpawning-Runs of Sea Lamprey. .103 Appendix 11 Federal/l?rmincial. Agreement on Sea Lamprey Barrier Dams . 111 Appendix 12 WamiqSignsatSeaLamprey BarrierIhms . 119 Appendk 13 Information Signs at Sea Lamprey Barrier &ms . 123 Appendu 14 Draft Letter to owness ofmtsStoppiqSpawning- Run Sea Lamprey . 125 ii EXECUTIVE SUMMARY The Great Lakes Fishery Ccmnission established a Task Force at its annual meeting in May 1984 to evaluate the sea lamprey barrier dam program The objectives of the Task Force were a) to evaluate the effectiveness of the sea lamprey barrier dam program fromboth a biological and econm.ic perqective, b) to identify successes andsho~ arflc)tomke reammx&tionsconcerning further develmtof barrier dam lformnagment of sea lampreys throughout the Great-.
    [Show full text]
  • Club Activities
    Volume 41, Number 3 March – April 2007 Club Activities Indoor: Meetings begin at 7:30 pm on the second Tuesday of the month, October to June at St. Andrew’s United Church, 89 Mountainview Road South (at Sinclair) in Georgetown unless stated otherwise. Feb. 13: Central and South America, and the Bruce Peninsula. Bev Whatmough will be giving a presentation on some of the flora and fauna, and a look at the new Bruce Peninsula Park and Fathom Five Park interpretive centre. Mar. 13: Re-introduction of Elk into Ontario. Meagan Hazell will speak about her research on the release of large ruminants into Ontario Apr. 10: Halton Natural Areas Inventory. Andrea Dunn, Conservation Halton, will be talking on the results of the Sixteen Mile Creek Monitoring Study. Andrea was the coordinator of the project. Outdoor: Trips begin at the Niagara Escarpment Commission (NEC) parking lot at Guelph and Mountainview Road, Georgetown, unless stated otherwise. If you would like to meet the group at the trip site, please speak to the trip leader for the location and directions to the starting point. Jan. 21: Burlington Waterfowl. Meet 8:00 am. In case of inclement weather, check ahead with the trip leaders, Kelly Bowen and Andrew Kellman (905) 873-7338 Feb.18: Butterfly Conservatory, Niagara Falls, Ontario. Meet at the NEC parking lot at 8:00 am, or at the conservatory at about 9:30 am. Admission is $11 for adults. This should be a great opportunity to photograph butterflies and get a winter taste of the tropics! Depending on the weather and the group’s interests we may do some birding along the Niagara River or Lake Ontario in the afternoon.
    [Show full text]
  • Sea Lamprey Control in the Great Lakes 2016
    SEA LAMPREY CONTROL IN THE GREAT LAKES 2016 ANNUAL REPORT TO THE GREAT LAKES FISHERY COMMISSION Katherine Mullett U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Marquette, Michigan United States Paul Sullivan Fisheries and Oceans Canada Sault Ste. Marie, Ontario Canada GLFC Annual Meeting Duluth, Minnesota June 7-8, 2017 Cover: Larval Sea Lampreys being captured by USFWS Larval Assessment personnel with the use of backpack electroshocking units to determine population densities, age structure and larval distribution. (Photo USFWS) Patrick Wick (Physical Science Technician, USFWS) preparing a TFM application site on Stony Creek, a tributary to the East Branch Ontonagon River, during the Ontonagon River lampricide treatment in October 2016 (Photo by Chris Gagnon, USFWS). Table of Contents INTRODUCTION ......................................................................................................................................... 7 FISH-COMMUNITY OBJECTIVES ............................................................................................................ 8 Lake Superior .................................................................................................................................... 8 Lake Michigan .................................................................................................................................. 8 Lake Huron ....................................................................................................................................... 9 Lake Erie ..........................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]