DOCSLIB.ORG

Population in Goulais Bay, Lake Superior

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Population in Goulais Bay, Lake Superior See discussions, stats, and author profiles for this publication at: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/264864682 Identification of a robust Lake Sturgeon (Acipenser fulvescens Rafinesque, 1917) population in Goulais Bay, Lake Superior Article in Journal of Applied Ichthyology · August 2014 DOI: 10.1111/jai.12566 CITATIONS READS 0 33 5 authors, including: Thomas C. Pratt Jennie Pearce Fisheries and Oceans Canada Pearce & Associates Ecological Research 49 PUBLICATIONS 489 CITATIONS 42 PUBLICATIONS 3,610 CITATIONS SEE PROFILE SEE PROFILE All content following this page was uploaded by Thomas C. Pratt on 08 April 2016. The user has requested enhancement of the downloaded file. All in-text references underlined in blue are added to the original document and are linked to publications on ResearchGate, letting you access and read them immediately. Journal of Applied Ichthyology J. Appl. Ichthyol. (2014), 1–7 Received: December 6, 2013 © 2014 Her Majesty the Queen in Right of Canada Accepted: February 24, 2014 Journal of Applied Ichthyology © 2014 Blackwell Verlag GmbH doi: 10.1111/jai.12566 ISSN 0175–8659 Identification of a robust Lake Sturgeon (Acipenser fulvescens Rafinesque, 1917) population in Goulais Bay, Lake Superior By T. C. Pratt1, W. M. Gardner1, J. Pearce2, S. Greenwood3 and S. C. Chong3 1Fisheries and Oceans Canada, Great Lakes Laboratory for Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences, Sault Ste Marie, ON, Canada; 2Pearce & Associates Ecological Research, Sault Ste Marie, ON, Canada; 3Upper Great Lakes Management Unit, Ontario Ministry of Natural Resources, Sault Ste Marie, ON, Canada Summary anthropogenic activities due to specific life history character- Lake Sturgeon (Acipenser fulvescens Rafinesque, 1917) in istics, including slow growth and late maturation, intermit- Lake Superior are greatly depressed from their historic abun- tent spawning intervals, and habitat requirements such as dance, and few populations meet the rehabilitation goals specific temperature, flow velocities and substrate require- identified by management agencies. A netting program target- ments for successful spawning (Peterson et al., 2007). ing juvenile Lake Sturgeon (ages 3–15) was implemented from Lake Superior, the largest, deepest and coldest of the Lau- 2010 to 2012 in Goulais Bay, a shallow, productive bay in the rentian Great Lakes, contains a number of poorly studied south-eastern part of the lake, to determine abundance, distri- Lake Sturgeon populations that face unique challenges, even bution, population characteristics (size structure, condition, among the other Great Lakes (Auer, 2003). Anthropogenic age structure, mortality and growth), and recruitment pat- impacts are relatively modest and Lake Superior is the most < terns. Five-hundred and thirty-one individuals were captured pristine of the Great Lakes, with 2% of its watershed over the 3-year study, resulting in a mark-recapture estimate impacted by urbanization or agriculture and over 90% of the of 4977 (95% CIs 3295–7517) juveniles. Catch rates in this catchment covered by forests or water features (LaMP, 2013). study were higher than in any other location in Lake Superi- Despite its size, Lake Superior has a relatively simple ecosys- or, with sturgeon being broadly distributed around the bay. tem dominated by native species and has long been held as an Estimated annual survival rate ranged from 0.691 to 0.858, example of an ecosystem that is minimally disturbed and slow depending on the method used. The majority of fish captured to change, particularly in the face of immense changes in the were between 620 and 800 mm in total length and were other Great Lakes (e.g. Bronte et al., 2003; Mills et al., 2003; between 4 and 10 years of age (range 1–29 years). Recruiting Dobiesz et al., 2005). Lake Sturgeon are restricted in Lake year-classes were apparent every year, with no apparent Superior to tributaries and a few, select inshore embayments effects due to lampricide treatments (a suspected threat to as the vast majority of the lake is not suitable habitat due to age-0 Lake Sturgeon) in the Goulais River. Year-class cold temperatures, low productivity and extreme depths. strength was positively related to spring water levels. It is pos- Lake Sturgeon were historically believed to spawn in 22 sible that this robust Goulais Bay population could help tributaries in Lake Superior, however eight of those popula- re-populate the south-eastern part of Lake Superior, which tions are now thought to be extirpated due to exploitation, contains a number of large, productive embayment areas that habitat loss, pollution, and migration barriers (Slade and formerly supported large Lake Sturgeon populations. Auer, 1997; Auer, 1999; Pratt, 2008). A rehabilitation plan was developed specifically for Lake Superior, which identified the development of lake-wide protocols for sampling the var- Introduction ious life stages as key assessment needs (Auer, 2003). In Lake Sturgeon (Acipenser fulvescens Rafinesque, 1917) popu- response, a juvenile index netting protocol was developed lations have remained below recovery targets throughout the and implemented in 2011 across the lake off the mouth of all Laurentian Great Lakes despite rehabilitation activities that historic spawning tributaries (Schloesser et al., 2014). In the have addressed many of the identified threats (Auer, 1999; rehabilitation plan, Auer (2003) identified four Lake Superior Welsh et al., 2008; Chalupnicki et al., 2011). As a result, tributaries (the Sturgeon, Bad, St. Louis, and Nipigon rivers) Lake Sturgeon are listed as a species of conservation concern where it was thought that the population might meet restora- in all political jurisdictions bordering the Great Lakes, with tion targets. the exception of Wisconsin (Auer, 1999; COSEWIC, 2007). The implementation of the lake-wide juvenile assessment Lake Sturgeon are believed to be particularly vulnerable to allowed an opportunity to assess Lake Sturgeon populations throughout the lake. One sampling location, Goulais Bay, is a large (~80 km2), relatively shallow (mean depth <20 m) Reproduced with the permission of the Minister of Fisheries and embayment located in south-eastern Lake Superior, with Oceans. the Goulais River identified as a tributary with an extant 2 T. C. Pratt et al. spawning population (Auer, 2003). South-eastern Lake Supe- rior contains a number of large, shallow embayments (White- fish Bay, Goulais Bay, Batchawana Bay) supporting diminished Lake Sturgeon populations that are genetically distinct from other Lake Superior populations (Welsh et al., 2008). Given the generally inhospitable habitat conditions for Lake Sturgeon in Lake Superior with the exception of very near-shore areas, the identification of a robust popula- tion in the south-eastern part of the lake that could produce sturgeon capable of using these shallow embayment areas might enhance lake-wide recovery efforts. We sampled the Lake Sturgeon population in Goulais Bay from 2010 to 2012 to determine the abundance, distribution, population charac- teristics (size structure, condition, age structure, mortality and growth) and recruitment patterns of the juveniles. We specifically focused on assessing the role of spring flow con- ditions in the Goulais River and lampricide control (a hypothesized mortality factor to age-0 Lake Sturgeon in Great Lakes tributaries) on the year-class strength of cap- tured sturgeon. Methods Sampling Lake Sturgeon were sampled following a juvenile index net- ting protocol designed to primarily target fish smaller than 1000 mm in total length and between age-3 and age-15, with some larger mesh included to ensure that the presence of adult fish was not missed (Schloesser et al., 2014). Two gangs Fig. 1. Map of sampling locations, Goulais Bay, Lake Superior, of monofilament gill nets were combined to form a single with Lake Sturgeon (A. fulvescens) catch, represented by number of continuous net 304.8 m long. Each gang contained three sturgeon captured per gill net km panels: 91.4 m of 11.4 cm stretched mesh, 30.5 m of 20.3 cm stretched mesh and 30.5 m of 25.4 cm stretched mesh. In removed for age interpretation. Fish were then returned to 2010, 23 nets were set between 5 and 13 July. In 2011, 22 the lake, and released once they could swim away on their nets were set between 4 and 10 July, and in 2012, 27 nets own. were set between 3 and 9 July. Sampling locations in Goulais Pectoral fin rays were dried for at least 4 weeks prior to sec- Bay were randomly chosen so that three distances from the tioning. Each fin ray had two 300 lm sections cut from it spawning tributary were sampled (0–2 km, 2–5 km and using a Buehler IsoMet low-speed saw. Digital imaging soft- 5–10 km; Fig. 1). Nets were set overnight for approximately ware was used to amplify the fin ray section to estimate the 24 h in water between 3 m and 15 m in depth. number of annuli. Age was interpreted by two experienced Captured fishes were recorded by panel number. Non-tar- biologists who independently assessed both fin ray sections get fishes that were still alive were identified, weighed and and decided on the most likely age. Any ageing discrepancies released; dead non-target fishes were identified, weighed and were examined by a third person, and the majority age set aside for disposal. Any Lake Sturgeon captured was assigned. Fin-ray section photographs were also shared with immediately given a spaghetti tag applied on the dorsal sur- other sturgeon age-interpreters from around the Lake Superior face immediately posterior to the dorsal fin, and placed in a basin to provide further confidence in our age assessments. live well filled with fresh lake water. The number on the tag and the mesh size were recorded immediately. Each fish was measured for total length (mm), fork length (mm), girth Data analyses (mm, largest circumference posterior to pectoral fins), and The number of Lake Sturgeon captured per net set (CPUE) weight (g).
Load more

Recommended publications
  • N Shore L. Superior: Geology, Scenery
    THESE TERMS GOVERN YOUR USE OF THIS DOCUMENT Your use of this Ontario Geological Survey document (the “Content”) is governed by the terms set out on this page (“Terms of Use”). By downloading this Content, you (the “User”) have accepted, and have agreed to be bound by, the Terms of Use. Content: This Content is offered by the Province of Ontario’s Ministry of Northern Development and Mines (MNDM) as a public service, on an “as-is” basis. Recommendations and statements of opinion expressed in the Content are those of the author or authors and are not to be construed as statement of government policy. You are solely responsible for your use of the Content. You should not rely on the Content for legal advice nor as authoritative in your particular circumstances. Users should verify the accuracy and applicability of any Content before acting on it. MNDM does not guarantee, or make any warranty express or implied, that the Content is current, accurate, complete or reliable. MNDM is not responsible for any damage however caused, which results, directly or indirectly, from your use of the Content. MNDM assumes no legal liability or responsibility for the Content whatsoever. Links to Other Web Sites: This Content may contain links, to Web sites that are not operated by MNDM. Linked Web sites may not be available in French. MNDM neither endorses nor assumes any responsibility for the safety, accuracy or availability of linked Web sites or the information contained on them. The linked Web sites, their operation and content are the responsibility of the person or entity for which they were created or maintained (the “Owner”).
    [Show full text]
  • LAND by the LAKES Nearshore Terrestrial Ecosystems
    State of the Lakes Ecosystem Conference 1996 Background Paper THE LAND BY THE LAKES Nearshore Terrestrial Ecosystems Ron Reid Bobolink Enterprises Washago, Ontario Canada Karen Holland U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Chicago, Illinois U.S.A. October 1997 ISBN 0-662-26033-3 EPA 905-R-97-015c Cat. No. En40-11/35-3-1997E ii The Land by the Lakes—SOLEC 96 Table of Contents Acknowledgments ................................................................. v 1. Overview of the Land by the Lakes .................................................. 1 1.1 Introduction ............................................................ 1 1.2 Report Structure ......................................................... 2 1.3 Conclusion ............................................................. 2 1.4 Key Observations ........................................................ 3 1.5 Moving Forward ......................................................... 5 2. The Ecoregional Context .......................................................... 6 2.1 Why Consider Ecoregional Context? .......................................... 6 2.2 Classification Systems for Great Lakes Ecoregions ............................... 7 3. Where Land and Water Meet ....................................................... 9 3.1 Changing Shapes and Structures ............................................. 9 3.1.1 Crustal Tilting ................................................. 10 3.1.2 Climate ....................................................... 10 3.1.3 Erosion ......................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Report, January 1988
    REPORT OF THE EVALUATION OF THE GREAT LAKES FISHERY COMMISSIONS'S PROGRAM OF SEA LAMPREY BARRIER DAMS JANUARY 1988 LIsTOFAPPENDICES Great Lakes Fishery Commission's Policy Statement fortheF&leofIhrrierDanrs inanInteqat&Sea Lamprey CbntmlPmgram . 31 Appendix 2 Great Lakes Fishery &mmissionts Guidelines for Barrier Dam Fxgram for Sea Lamprey Management . 35 Appendix 3 Tansof Reference for the Task Force to Assess the Sea Lamprey Barrier Dam Program . 41 Appendix 4 Map of the Great Lakes Shc&.ngLccationofSea Lanqqzy Barrier Dams . 47 Information Matrix on Sea Lamprey l%rrierlhms. 49 Photographs of Sea Lamprey Bamier Dams...... 55 Design Drawings of Sea hmprey Barrier Dams.... 73 Remrks Fresented at the Official Opening of Denny's EamIampreyE?arrierandFishway, Saugeen River, Ontario, May 21, 1971 by J.J. Tibbles . 81 Appendix 9 Inventory of E3ristiqStmchres Blocking Sea Lamprey Migrations . 87 Great Lakes Fishery &mm.ission Application for Fur&toAcquireLandand/orConstructor~ira BarrierD3mtoStopSpawning-Runs of Sea Lamprey. .103 Appendix 11 Federal/l?rmincial. Agreement on Sea Lamprey Barrier Dams . 111 Appendix 12 WamiqSignsatSeaLamprey BarrierIhms . 119 Appendk 13 Information Signs at Sea Lamprey Barrier &ms . 123 Appendu 14 Draft Letter to owness ofmtsStoppiqSpawning- Run Sea Lamprey . 125 ii EXECUTIVE SUMMARY The Great Lakes Fishery Ccmnission established a Task Force at its annual meeting in May 1984 to evaluate the sea lamprey barrier dam program The objectives of the Task Force were a) to evaluate the effectiveness of the sea lamprey barrier dam program fromboth a biological and econm.ic perqective, b) to identify successes andsho~ arflc)tomke reammx&tionsconcerning further develmtof barrier dam lformnagment of sea lampreys throughout the Great-.
    [Show full text]
  • Sea Lamprey Control in the Great Lakes 2016
    SEA LAMPREY CONTROL IN THE GREAT LAKES 2016 ANNUAL REPORT TO THE GREAT LAKES FISHERY COMMISSION Katherine Mullett U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Marquette, Michigan United States Paul Sullivan Fisheries and Oceans Canada Sault Ste. Marie, Ontario Canada GLFC Annual Meeting Duluth, Minnesota June 7-8, 2017 Cover: Larval Sea Lampreys being captured by USFWS Larval Assessment personnel with the use of backpack electroshocking units to determine population densities, age structure and larval distribution. (Photo USFWS) Patrick Wick (Physical Science Technician, USFWS) preparing a TFM application site on Stony Creek, a tributary to the East Branch Ontonagon River, during the Ontonagon River lampricide treatment in October 2016 (Photo by Chris Gagnon, USFWS). Table of Contents INTRODUCTION ......................................................................................................................................... 7 FISH-COMMUNITY OBJECTIVES ............................................................................................................ 8 Lake Superior .................................................................................................................................... 8 Lake Michigan .................................................................................................................................. 8 Lake Huron ....................................................................................................................................... 9 Lake Erie ..........................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Eagle Lake Silver Lake Lawre Lake Jackfish Lake Esox Lak Osb River
    98° 97° 96° 95° 94° 93° 92° 91° 90° 89° 88° 87° 86° 85° 84° 83° 82° 81° 80° 79° 78° 77° 76° 75° 74° 73° 72° 71° Natural Resources Canada 56° East r Pen Island CANADA LANDS - ONTARIO e v er i iv R e R ttl k e c K u FIRST NATIONS LANDS AND 56° D k c a l B Hudson Bay NATIONAL PARKS River kibi Nis Produced by the Surveyor General Branch, Geomatics Canada, Natural Resources Canada. Mistahayo ver October 2011 Edition. Spect witan Ri or Lake Lake Pipo To order this product contact: FORT SEVERN I H NDIAN RESERVE Surveyor General Branch, Geomatics Canada, Natural Resources Canada osea Lake NO. 89 Partridge Is land Ontario Client Liaison Unit, Toronto, Ontario, Telephone (416) 973-1010 or r ive E-mail: [email protected] R r e For other related products from the Surveyor General Branch, see website sgb.nrcan.gc.ca v a MA e r 55° N B e I v T i O k k © 2011. Her Majesty the Queen in Right of Canada. Natural Resources Canada. B R e A e y e e e r r C k C ic p e D s a 55° o r S t turge o on Lak r e B r G e k e k v e a e e v a e e e iv e r r St r r R u e C S C Riv n B r rgeon r d e e o k t v o e v i Scale: 1:2 000 000 or one centimetre equals 20 kilometres S i W t o k s n R i o in e M o u R r 20 0 20 40 60 80 100 120 kilometres B m berr Wabuk Point i a se y B k v l Goo roo r l g Cape Lookout e e Point e ff h a Flagsta e Cape v r Littl S h i S R S g a Lambert Conformal Conical Projection, Standard Parallels 49° N and 77° N c F Shagamu ta Maria n Henriet r h a Cape i i e g w Lake o iv o h R R n R c ai iv iv Mis Polar Bear Provincial Park E h er e ha r tc r r m ve ua r e a i q v tt N as ve i awa R ey Lake P Ri k NOTE: rne R ee ho se r T e C This map is not to be used for defining boundaries.
    [Show full text]
  • ATLAS of the SPAWNING and NURSERY AREAS of GREAT LAKES FISHES Volume II - Lake Superior
    Biological Services Program FWS/OBS-82/52 SEPTEMBER 1982 ATLAS OF THE SPAWNING AND NURSERY AREAS OF GREAT LAKES FISHES Volume II - Lake Superior Great Lake - St. Lawrence Seaway Navigation Season Extension Program Fish and Wildlife Service Corps of Engineers U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Department of the Army The Biological Services Program was established within the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service to supply scientific information and methodologies on key environmental issues that Impact fish and wildlife resources and their supporting ecosystems. The mission of the program is as follows: o To strengthen the Fish and Wildlife Service in its role as a primary source of information on national fish and wild- life resources, particularly in respect to environmental impact assessment. o To gather, analyze, and present information that will aid decisionmakers in the identification and resolution of problems associated with major changes in land and water use. o To provide better ecological information and evaluation for Department of the Interior development programs, such as those relatfng to energy development. Information developed by the Biological Services Program is intended for use in the planning and decisionmaking process to prevent or minimize the impact of development on fish and wildlife. Research activities and technlcal assistance services are based on an analysis of the issues, a determination of the decisionmakers involved and their informatlon needs, and an evaluation of the state of the art to identify information gaps and to determine priorities. This is a strategy that will ensure that the products produced and disseminated are timely and useful.
    [Show full text]
  • STATUS of WALLEYE in the GREAT LAKES: CASE STUDIES PREPARED for the 1989 WORKSHOP Edited by Peter J
    STATUS OF WALLEYE IN THE GREAT LAKES: CASE STUDIES PREPARED FOR THE 1989 WORKSHOP edited by Peter J. Colby Ministry of Natural Resources Fisheries Research Section, Walleye Unit 435 S. James Street P.O. Pox 5000 Thunder Day, Ontario, Canada P7C 5G6 Cheryl A. Lewis Ministry of Natural Resources Glenora Fisheries Station R. R. #4 Picton, Ontario, Canada KOK 2T0 Randy L. Eshenroder Great Lakes Fishery Commission 1451 Green Road Ann Arbor, MI 48105-2898 Citation (general): Colby, P. J., C. A. Lewis, and R. L. Eshenroder, [ED.]. 1991. Status of walleye in the Great Lakes: case studies prepared for the 1989 workshop. Great Lakes Fish. Comm. Spec. Pub. 91-l. 222 p. Citation (example for individual paper): Schram, S. T., J. R. Atkinson, and D. L. Pereira. 1991. Lake Superior walleye stocks : status and management, p. l-22. In P. J. Colby, C. A. Lewis, and R. L. Eshenroder [ed.]. Status of walleye in the Great Lakes: case studies prepared for the 1989 workshop. Great Lakes Fish. Comm. Spec. Pub. 91-l. Special Publication No. 91-1 GREAT LAKES FISHERY COMMISSION 1451 Green Road Ann Arbor, MI 48105 January 1991 The case studies in this publication were produced as preparatory material for the Walleye Rehabilitation Workshop held June 5-9, 1990 at the Franz-Theodore Stone Laboratory at Put-in-Ray, Ohio. This workshop was sponsored by the Great Lakes Fishery Commission's Board of Technical Experts. For a number of years, Henry H. Regier had urged the Board to initiate such a study to document recent changes in walleye populations that were particularly evident inwestern Lake Erie.
    [Show full text]
  • Ontario History Index from 1993 to 2016 Issue 1
    Ontario History Scholarly Journal of The Ontario Historical Society since 1899 INDEX 1993-2016 Issue 1 The Ontario Historical Society Established in 1888, the OHS is a non-profit corporation and registered charity; a non-government group bringing together people of all ages, all walks of life and all cultural backgrounds interested in preserving some aspect of Ontario's history. Learn more at www.ontariohistoricalsociety.ca This index was made possible with the financial support of the Ontario Ministry of Tourism, Culture and Sport, the Honourable Michael Chan, Minister, the Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada, and the generous assistance of the Ontario Trillium Foundation. CONTENTS Table of Contents ............................... 3 Author Index ................................... 51 Books Reviewed Index .................... 112 Special Issues .................................. 160 Subject Index .................................. 172 To Go Back: Press ALT + (back arrow) (in downloaded PDF, not in browser) 2 Ontario History Scholarly Journal of The Ontario Historical Society since 1899 TABLE OF CONTENTS 1993-2016 Issue 1 The Ontario Historical Society Established in 1888, the OHS is a non-profit corporation and registered charity; a non-government group bringing together people of all ages, all walks of life and all cultural backgrounds interested in preserving some aspect of Ontario's history. Learn more at www.ontariohistoricalsociety.ca 3 To Go Back: Press ALT + (back arrow) (in downloaded PDF, not in browser) Go To Top (Contents) Ontario History, 1993-2016 Issue 1 Table of Contents Volume 85, 1: 1993 Editor: Jean Burnet 1. Cameron, Wendy, “’Till they get tidings from those who are gone…’ Thoms Sockett and Letters from Petworth Emigrants, 1832-1837.” 1-16 2.
    [Show full text]
  • Canada Centre for Inland Waters 867 Lakeshore Road, PO
    Benthic Fauna Assemblages in Batchawana Bay, Lake Superior R.M. Dermott Great Lakes Fisheries Research Branch Canada Centre for Inland Waters 867 Lakeshore Road, PO. Box 5050 Burlington, Ontario L7R 4A6 May, 1984 Canadian Technical Report of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences 1 No. 1265 Fisheries Peches and Oceans et Oceans Canada Canadian Technical Report of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences Technical reports contain scientific and technical information that contributes to existing knowledge but which is not normally appropriate for primary literature. Technical reports are directed primarily toward a worldwide audience and have an international distribution. No restriction is placed on subject matter and the series reflects the broad interests and policies of the Department of Fisheries and Oceans, namely, fisheries and aquatic sciences. Technical reports may be cited as full publications. The correct citation appears above the abstract of each report. Each report is abstracted in Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts and indexed in the Department's annual index to scientific and technical publications. Numbers 1-456 in this series were issued as Technical Reports of the Fisheries Research Board of Canada. Numbers 457-714 were issued as Department of the Environment, Fisheries and Marine Service, Research and Development Directorate Technical Reports. Numbers 715 -924 were issued as Department of Fisheries and the Environment, Fisheries and Marine Service Technical Reports. The current series name was changed with report number 925. Technical reports are produced regionally but are numbered nationally. Requests for individual reports will be filled by the issuing establishment listed on the front cover and title page. Out-of-stock reports will be supplied for a fee by commercial agents.
    [Show full text]
  • 1. Goulais HEALTHY WATERS REPORT CARD Summary
    Lake Superior Biodiversity Conservation Assessment - Volume 2: Regional Unit Summaries 1. Goulais HEALTHY WATERS REPORT CARD OFFSHORE NA ISLANDS A NEARSHORE B COASTAL WETLANDS B EMBAYMENTS & B COASTAL TERRESTRIAL A INSHORE TRIBUTARIES & B OVERALL B+ WATERSHEDS Report card denotes general condition/health of each biodiversity target in the region based on condition/stress indices. See introduction to the regional summaries. A Ecologically desirable status; requires little intervention for Very maintenance Good B Within acceptable range of variation; may require some Good intervention for maintenance. C Outside of the range of acceptable variation and requires Fair management. If unchecked, the biodiversity target may be vulnerable to serious degradation. D Allowing the biodiversity target to remain in this condition for Poor an extended period will make restoration or preventing extirpation practically impossible. Unknown Insufficient information. View of Lake Superior shoreline from Batchawana Bay. Photo credit: Sue Greenwood/ Ontario Ministry of Natural Resources Summary/ Description The Goulais regional unit is located in Ontario on the eastern shore of Lake Superior, and extends from the international boundary at the St. Marys River in the south to near the Montreal River Harbour in the north. This regional unit is 5,929.95 km2 in size, including the associated nearshore waters. A number of provincial parks, conservation reserves and enhanced management areas are located in this regional unit. The largest community in the area, Sault Ste. Marie, Ontario is located near the southern end of this regional unit. Other communities in this regional unit include Goulais River, Havilland, Harmony Bay, Batchawana Bay, Obadjiwan (Batchewana1) First Nation and Searchmont.
    [Show full text]
  • Forest Health Conditions in Ontario 2019 Ministry of Natural Resources and Forestry September 22, 2020 Page 2 of 163 C 5 - CW Info
    September 22, 2020 Page 1 of 163 C 5 - CW Info Forest Health Conditions in Ontario 2019 Ministry of Natural Resources and Forestry September 22, 2020 Page 2 of 163 C 5 - CW Info Forest Health Conditions in Ontario 2019 Compiled by: • Ontario Ministry of Natural Resources and Forestry, Science and Research Branch © 2020, Queen’s Printer for Ontario Printed in Ontario, Canada Find the Ministry of Natural Resources and Forestry online at ontario.ca. For more information about forest health monitoring in Ontario visit ontario.ca/page/forest-health-conditions. Cette publication hautement spécialisée, Forest Health Conditions in Ontario 2019, n’est disponible qu’en anglais conformément au Règlement 671/92, selon lequel il n’est pas obligatoire de la traduire en vertu de la Loi sur les services en français. Pour obtenir des renseignements en français, veuillez communiquer avec le ministère des Richesses naturelles et des Forêts au [email protected]. Some of the information in this document may not be compatible with assistive technologies. If you need any of the information in an alternate format, please contact [email protected]. ISBN 978-1-4868-4585-9 (pdf) i September 22, 2020 Page 3 of 163 C 5 - CW Info Contents Contributors ..................................................................................................................... iii État de santé des forêts en 2019 ...................................................................................... iv Introduction ......................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Georgian Bay
    Great Lakes Cruising Club Copyright 2009, Great Lakes Cruising Club INDEX Port Pilot and Log Book INCLUDES The Great Lakes Cruising Club, its members, agents, or servants, shall not be liable, and user waives all claims, for damages to persons or property sustained by or arising from the use of this report. ALPHABETICAL INDEX — PAGE 3 GEOGRAPHICAL INDEX — PAGE 17 Page 2 / Index Note: all harbor reports are available to GLCC members on the GLCC website: www.glcclub.com. Members are also encouraged to submit updates directly on the web page. The notation NR indicates that no report has yet been prepared for that harbor. Members are asked to provide information when they NR visit those harbors. A guide to providing data is available in Appendix 2. A harbor number in brackets, such as [S-14], following another report number indicates that there is no individual report for that [ ] harbor but that information on it is contained in the bracketed harbor report. The notation (OOP) indicates that a report is out-of-print, with OOP indefinite plans for republishing. The Great Lakes Cruising Club, its members, agents, and servants shall not be liable, and the user waives all claims for damages to persons or property sustained by or arising from the use of the Port Pilot and Log Book. Index compiled and edited by Ron Dwelle Copyright Great Lakes Cruising Club, 2009 PO Box 611003 Port Huron, Michigan 48061-1003 810-984-4500 [email protected] Page 2 ___________________________________________________________________ Great Lakes Cruising Club — Index
    [Show full text]