Pre-Gambrian Rocks of the Lake Superior Region

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Pre-Gambrian Rocks of the Lake Superior Region UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR Harold L. Ickes, Secretary GEOLOGICAL SURVEY W. C. Mcndenhall, Director Professional Paper 184 PRE-GAMBRIAN ROCKS OF THE LAKE SUPERIOR REGION A REVIEW OF NEWLY DISCOVERED GEOLOGIC FEATURES WITH A REVISED GEOLOGIC MAP BY C. K. LEITH, RICHARD J. LUND, AND ANDREW LEITH UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE WASHINGTON : 1935 For salo by the Superintendent of Documents, Washington, D.C. ............. Price 60 cents (paper cover) CONTENTS Page Abstract. _________-____________^__.-___-_._________._--__ _--...-_.--_-__-__-_--___---________-_____._____._ 1 Introduction. ________________________:___________________________!________ _ __________.__________________.____' 1 Principal changes from the old mapping.._______________________________________________________________________ 2 Michigan and Wisconsin.________:_____-____--_--__----_----_--___-__----___-_-_-_--__-___.___.___________ 3 Minnesota. ___-__-_-__-_-____._-______________-_---___-__-----_------..------__-_____-______-__-._______._ 5 Canada.________--l_________________-__________-...-_--____-______---________,--_________________________ 7 General succession..__________________________________________________________________________________________ 7 Cretaceous, Ordovician, and Cambrian rocks_________________________________________________________________ 7 Keweenawan series.___________--__.._________-_-_--__--_-_-.___--_-_-___-___-___---___-__.________________ 7 Huronian series____-_-___-_--------__--.i--_-----_--_---------------_-_---------_-_-_-__--_-___-__________ 8 Basement complex (Keewatin and Laurentian series) _-------___-_____---_-_---___-_-__________-_______.-.. 9 Correlation. _______________ _"_____________________---_-_-l-_-_-_-_-___-_____ _______________________________ 9 Keweenawan series_____..__-__-_--_---__-----__-------_--------_----------_---_---_------_-_---_-_-__-____._.. 10 New correlation of the Upper and Middle Huronian groups..______________________________________________________ 13 Michigan and Wisconsin,_____-_-________-_-__-_-_--------_-------_-_-_---___-----___--_-.________________ 13 Minnesota..._ ____________________________-__-_-_----------_-_-----_-_-_--__-_-___________-___.__________ 15 Age of the Knife Lake series and its equivalents_--_---_--------------------------_-__-___-_-_--------_-_________. 16 Relations to the unquestioned Huronian rocks__-__------__-_---__--_-_----___-_-_-_-_-_________.__________.. 16 Relations to the Keewatin series_______________-_--------------___---_--_-_-_-___-______-_________________ 17 Three periods of granitic intrusion.___________________-----._-_-_-_-------_^_-_-__------_--_-_____._____________ 18 Minnesota_ _---_--_____-_________________--_l__--_-_-__^___________-_-___--____________________________ 18 Wisconsin and Michigan. _______-_:________-_______-_----_ __---___________________________________________ 19 North shore of Lake Superior.__________---__-___--------_-_-_-----------__-__-_-_--__-____-__._______.____ 20 East shore of Lake Superior.________----_-__--------__-_-_----_---------------------_-----_--___-________. 20 General comments..______________________________--_----_-____-__-______-_-__-___-_____________________ i _ 20 Origin of the iron-formation.__.____---_-___-_-_-------------------_-_-----------_---_-_-_-__----__-__.________ 21 Different hypotheses,.___--___________--_---_-----------_-.---------------_---_-_---___--_-_-__-__________ 21 Iron bacteria and algae__________-____--__--__---_-------------------------_-_-_-_--__--_______-_____.._.__ 23 Conclusion ________________-_.-__--__---_-__------_----------------------------------_-__-________________ 23 Oxidation of the iron-formation and concentration to ore._-_----_-_---_____-____--_-_-____.__________________._____ 23 Agency involved.__.______________--_---_-_---_--_---------------------------_-___----___---_-_____..__._ 23 Restatement of processes of ore concentration._______________________________________________________________ 24 Bibliography __ ___._________..___--_-_---------_-------------------- _-----------__-----__--_-____--_________ 26 Index _____._-_._-_--.__.___-_____-- - --- ----- ----- ___ --_-__-_..__.____.__-_._ 33 ILLUSTRATION PLATE 1. Geologic map of the Lake Superior region and structure sections- _ In pocket. INSERT Page Correlation of formations in the Lake Superior region__ 10 n PRE-GAMBRIAN ROCKS OF THE LAKE SUPERIOR REGION A REVIEW OF NEWLY DISCOVERED GEOLOGIC FEATURES, WITH A REVISED GEOLOGIC MAP By C. K. LEITH, RICHARD J. LUND, and ANDREW LEITH ABSTRACT significance of the terms, which implied that the fEparchean Detailed kno\vledge of the geology of the pre-Cambrian rocks intervals of two widely separated districts were equivalent in of the Lake Superior region has been greatly augmented since time, has been abandoned. the publication of Monograph 52 by the United States Geologi­ The question of the origin of the iron-formations and the cal Survey iui 1911. The authors have attempted in the pres­ subsequent concentration of the iron ores is reviewed, and it ent report to assemble as much of this new information as pos­ is concluded that the theories presented in Monograph 52 are sible, and to give the reader a birdseye view of the geology essentially correct. The iron in the iron-formations is thought as seen in the light of all studies made there up to the pres­ to be derived principally from volcanic sources and possibly ent time. Detailed descriptions are not presented, and the to a lesser extent from,weathering; the concentration of the emphasis is placed upon the major problems of correlation. iron ores is due to oxidation and leaching of silica by down­ A revised nuip of the region, with cross sections, accompanies ward-moving surface, water. the report, bringing up to date a knowledge of the areal geol­ A'bibliography of literature bearing on the pre-Cambrian ogy of the region, which otherwise could be gained only by con­ geology.of the xegiori which has appeared since the manu­ sulting some 150 maps contained in almost as many separate script of, Monograph 52 \ya.s completed, in 1910, concludes the local reports, many of which are unpublished. report. ,.---,..... Principal changes fromo the map accompanying Monograph INTRODUCTION 52 are summarized, the most striking of which, aside from Around Lake-Superior,-in the- States of Michigan, changes resulting from shifts in correlations, are found in Can­ ada, northern Minnesota, and northern Wisconsin areas which Wisconsin, and. Minnesota" and the Province of On­ up to 1911 had not received the detailed study..which.has been tario, is-an area of pre-Cambrian rocks representing given them since that time. " , part of :the south margin of the great pre-Cambrian The geologic succession is, in ascending order, (1) the shield of North'.America., It yields about 85 percent Keewatin series, intruded by the Laurentian granite; (2) the of the\iron ore of; the United States and 10 percent of Knife Lake series (which may be Lower Huronian), intruded its copper. Production in this region is confined to by the Algoman granite; (3) the Huronian series, including the Lower, Middle, and Upper Huronian groups; (4) the' Ke- United States territory. ' The region has produced weenawan series, intruded by the Killarney granite, the exact more 'than 1,500,000,000 tons of iron ore, and tax com­ age of which is doubtful; and (5) the Cambrian, Ordoyician, mission estimates for Minnesota, Michigan, and Wis­ Cretaceous, and Pleistocene rocks. The series and- groups consin show-about the same amount in reserve. Exten­ named are separated by unconformities. sion of< known deposits (particularly in depth) and New views in respect to correlation of the pre-Cambrian rocks are discussed at length. The most noteworthy of these further discoveries will add. to this figure. If pro­ are (1) the correlation of the major iron-formations of the duction continues at the rate established since the Mesabi, Gogebic, Marquette, and Menoininee ranges as of World War, exclusive of the present depression, the Negaunee (Middle Huronian) age, and the iron-formations of peak of capacity for production will be passed in per­ the Cuyuna, Iron River, Florence, and Crystal Falls districts haps 25 years, after which there will be a falling-off as of Upper Huronian age; (2) the recognition of "the uncer­ tainty surrounding the age of the Knife Lake series, with an due to beginning exhaustion of .the Mesabi range of inclination to view it as pre-Lower Huronian, but pointing .out Minnesota, which has been the principal producer. the distinct possibility of its being Lower Huronian; (3) the The region has also produced about 4,000,000 tons of recognition and better delimitation of three, great periods of metallic copper, but the output of copper is already granitic intrusion Laurentian, Algoman, and Killarney the waning, because of low grade, great depth, and high Laurentian of wide distribution throughout the region, the cost. .,.-:. Algoman confined largely to the north shore of-Lake Superior, and the Killarney confined largely to the south shore. - Copper mining has- continued since 1844 in the One important change from Monograph 52 is in the use of Keweenaw district of Michigan. Iron mining began the terms " Archeau " and " Algonkian." In the present report in .the Marquette. .district of Michigan in 1848 and they designate two rock types a lower or basement group, slowly - spread over other parts of the region. The largely igneous, which is not divisible
Recommended publications
  • The Geology of the Middle Precambrian Rove Formation in Northeastern Minnesota
    MINNESOTA GEOLOGICAL SURVEY 5 P -7 Special Publication Series The Geology of the Middle Precambrian Rove Formation in northeastern Minnesota G. B. Morey UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA MINNEAPOLIS • 1969 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I THE GEOLOGY OF THE MIDDLE PRECAMBRIAN ROVE FORMATION IN NORTHEASTERN MINNESOTA by G. B. Morey CONTENTS Page Abstract ........................................... 1 Introduction. 3 Location and scope of study. 3 Acknowledgements .. 3 Regional geology . 5 Structural geology . 8 Rock nomenclature . 8 Stratigraphy . .. 11 Introduction . .. 11 Nomenclature and correlation. .. 11 Type section . .. 11 Thickness . .. .. 14 Lower argillite unit. .. 16 Definition, distribution, and thickness. .. 16 Lithologic character . .. 16 Limestones. .. 17 Concretions. .. 17 Transition unit . .. 17 Definition, distribution, and thickness. .. 17 Lithologic character . .. 19 Thin-bedded graywacke unit . .. 19 Definition, distribution, and thickness. .. 19 Lithologic character. .. 20 Concretions ... .. 20 Sedimentary structures. .. 22 Internal bedding structures. .. 22 Structureless bedding . .. 23 Laminated bedding . .. 23 Graded bedding. .. 23 Cross-bedding . .. 25 Convolute bedding. .. 26 Internal bedding sequences . .. 26 Post-deposition soft sediment deformation structures. .. 27 Bed pull-aparts . .. 27 Clastic dikes . .. 27 Load pockets .. .. 28 Flame structures . .. 28 Overfolds . .. 28 Microfaults. .. 28 Ripple marks .................................. 28 Sole marks . .. 28 Groove casts . .. 30 Flute casts .
    [Show full text]
  • Population in Goulais Bay, Lake Superior
    See discussions, stats, and author profiles for this publication at: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/264864682 Identification of a robust Lake Sturgeon (Acipenser fulvescens Rafinesque, 1917) population in Goulais Bay, Lake Superior Article in Journal of Applied Ichthyology · August 2014 DOI: 10.1111/jai.12566 CITATIONS READS 0 33 5 authors, including: Thomas C. Pratt Jennie Pearce Fisheries and Oceans Canada Pearce & Associates Ecological Research 49 PUBLICATIONS 489 CITATIONS 42 PUBLICATIONS 3,610 CITATIONS SEE PROFILE SEE PROFILE All content following this page was uploaded by Thomas C. Pratt on 08 April 2016. The user has requested enhancement of the downloaded file. All in-text references underlined in blue are added to the original document and are linked to publications on ResearchGate, letting you access and read them immediately. Journal of Applied Ichthyology J. Appl. Ichthyol. (2014), 1–7 Received: December 6, 2013 © 2014 Her Majesty the Queen in Right of Canada Accepted: February 24, 2014 Journal of Applied Ichthyology © 2014 Blackwell Verlag GmbH doi: 10.1111/jai.12566 ISSN 0175–8659 Identification of a robust Lake Sturgeon (Acipenser fulvescens Rafinesque, 1917) population in Goulais Bay, Lake Superior By T. C. Pratt1, W. M. Gardner1, J. Pearce2, S. Greenwood3 and S. C. Chong3 1Fisheries and Oceans Canada, Great Lakes Laboratory for Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences, Sault Ste Marie, ON, Canada; 2Pearce & Associates Ecological Research, Sault Ste Marie, ON, Canada; 3Upper Great Lakes Management Unit, Ontario Ministry of Natural Resources, Sault Ste Marie, ON, Canada Summary anthropogenic activities due to specific life history character- Lake Sturgeon (Acipenser fulvescens Rafinesque, 1917) in istics, including slow growth and late maturation, intermit- Lake Superior are greatly depressed from their historic abun- tent spawning intervals, and habitat requirements such as dance, and few populations meet the rehabilitation goals specific temperature, flow velocities and substrate require- identified by management agencies.
    [Show full text]
  • N Shore L. Superior: Geology, Scenery
    THESE TERMS GOVERN YOUR USE OF THIS DOCUMENT Your use of this Ontario Geological Survey document (the “Content”) is governed by the terms set out on this page (“Terms of Use”). By downloading this Content, you (the “User”) have accepted, and have agreed to be bound by, the Terms of Use. Content: This Content is offered by the Province of Ontario’s Ministry of Northern Development and Mines (MNDM) as a public service, on an “as-is” basis. Recommendations and statements of opinion expressed in the Content are those of the author or authors and are not to be construed as statement of government policy. You are solely responsible for your use of the Content. You should not rely on the Content for legal advice nor as authoritative in your particular circumstances. Users should verify the accuracy and applicability of any Content before acting on it. MNDM does not guarantee, or make any warranty express or implied, that the Content is current, accurate, complete or reliable. MNDM is not responsible for any damage however caused, which results, directly or indirectly, from your use of the Content. MNDM assumes no legal liability or responsibility for the Content whatsoever. Links to Other Web Sites: This Content may contain links, to Web sites that are not operated by MNDM. Linked Web sites may not be available in French. MNDM neither endorses nor assumes any responsibility for the safety, accuracy or availability of linked Web sites or the information contained on them. The linked Web sites, their operation and content are the responsibility of the person or entity for which they were created or maintained (the “Owner”).
    [Show full text]
  • The Penokean Orogeny in the Lake Superior Region Klaus J
    Precambrian Research 157 (2007) 4–25 The Penokean orogeny in the Lake Superior region Klaus J. Schulz ∗, William F. Cannon U.S. Geological Survey, 954 National Center, Reston, VA 20192, USA Received 16 March 2006; received in revised form 1 September 2006; accepted 5 February 2007 Abstract The Penokean orogeny began at about 1880 Ma when an oceanic arc, now the Pembine–Wausau terrane, collided with the southern margin of the Archean Superior craton marking the end of a period of south-directed subduction. The docking of the buoyant craton to the arc resulted in a subduction jump to the south and development of back-arc extension both in the initial arc and adjacent craton margin to the north. A belt of volcanogenic massive sulfide deposits formed in the extending back-arc rift within the arc. Synchronous extension and subsidence of the Superior craton resulted in a broad shallow sea characterized by volcanic grabens (Menominee Group in northern Michigan). The classic Lake Superior banded iron-formations, including those in the Marquette, Gogebic, Mesabi and Gunflint Iron Ranges, formed in that sea. The newly established subduction zone caused continued arc volcanism until about 1850 Ma when a fragment of Archean crust, now the basement of the Marshfield terrane, arrived at the subduction zone. The convergence of Archean blocks of the Superior and Marshfield cratons resulted in the major contractional phase of the Penokean orogeny. Rocks of the Pembine–Wausau arc were thrust northward onto the Superior craton causing subsidence of a foreland basin in which sedimentation began at about 1850 Ma in the south (Baraga Group rocks) and 1835 Ma in the north (Rove and Virginia Formations).
    [Show full text]
  • Open Kosei.Pdf
    The Pennsylvania State University The Graduate School Department of Geosciences GEOCHEMISTRY OF ARCHEAN–PALEOPROTEROZOIC BLACK SHALES: THE EARLY EVOLUTION OF THE ATMOSPHERE, OCEANS, AND BIOSPHERE A Thesis in Geosciences by Kosei Yamaguchi Copyright 2002 Kosei Yamaguchi Submitted in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy May 2002 We approve the thesis of Kosei Yamaguchi Date of Signature ____________________________________ _______________________ Hiroshi Ohmoto Professor of Geochemistry Thesis Advisor Chair of Committee ____________________________________ _______________________ Michael A. Arthur Professor of Geosciences ____________________________________ _______________________ Lee R. Kump Professor of Geosciences ____________________________________ _______________________ Raymond G. Najjar Associate Professor of Meteorology ____________________________________ _______________________ Peter Deines Professor of Geochemistry Associate Head for Graduate Program and Research in Geosciences iii ABSTRACT When did the Earth's surface environment become oxic? The timing and mechanism of the rise of atmospheric pO2 level in the early Precambrian have been long debated but no consensus has been reached. The oxygenation of the atmosphere and oceans has significant impacts on the evolution of the biosphere and the geochemical cycles of redox-sensitive elements. In order to constrain the evolution of the atmosphere, oceans, biosphere, and geochemical cycles of elements, a systematic and multidisciplinary
    [Show full text]
  • Report, January 1988
    REPORT OF THE EVALUATION OF THE GREAT LAKES FISHERY COMMISSIONS'S PROGRAM OF SEA LAMPREY BARRIER DAMS JANUARY 1988 LIsTOFAPPENDICES Great Lakes Fishery Commission's Policy Statement fortheF&leofIhrrierDanrs inanInteqat&Sea Lamprey CbntmlPmgram . 31 Appendix 2 Great Lakes Fishery &mmissionts Guidelines for Barrier Dam Fxgram for Sea Lamprey Management . 35 Appendix 3 Tansof Reference for the Task Force to Assess the Sea Lamprey Barrier Dam Program . 41 Appendix 4 Map of the Great Lakes Shc&.ngLccationofSea Lanqqzy Barrier Dams . 47 Information Matrix on Sea Lamprey l%rrierlhms. 49 Photographs of Sea Lamprey Bamier Dams...... 55 Design Drawings of Sea hmprey Barrier Dams.... 73 Remrks Fresented at the Official Opening of Denny's EamIampreyE?arrierandFishway, Saugeen River, Ontario, May 21, 1971 by J.J. Tibbles . 81 Appendix 9 Inventory of E3ristiqStmchres Blocking Sea Lamprey Migrations . 87 Great Lakes Fishery &mm.ission Application for Fur&toAcquireLandand/orConstructor~ira BarrierD3mtoStopSpawning-Runs of Sea Lamprey. .103 Appendix 11 Federal/l?rmincial. Agreement on Sea Lamprey Barrier Dams . 111 Appendix 12 WamiqSignsatSeaLamprey BarrierIhms . 119 Appendk 13 Information Signs at Sea Lamprey Barrier &ms . 123 Appendu 14 Draft Letter to owness ofmtsStoppiqSpawning- Run Sea Lamprey . 125 ii EXECUTIVE SUMMARY The Great Lakes Fishery Ccmnission established a Task Force at its annual meeting in May 1984 to evaluate the sea lamprey barrier dam program The objectives of the Task Force were a) to evaluate the effectiveness of the sea lamprey barrier dam program fromboth a biological and econm.ic perqective, b) to identify successes andsho~ arflc)tomke reammx&tionsconcerning further develmtof barrier dam lformnagment of sea lampreys throughout the Great-.
    [Show full text]
  • G-012011-1E Geological Precambrian Timeline Midwest
    Copper Harbor Conglomerate Gunflint Formation: Breccia with white quartz Precambrian Geologic Events in the Mid-Continent of North America G-012011-1E 1 inch (Century Mine, Upper Peninsula MI) (Sibley Peninsula, Thunder Bay, ON) Compiled by: Steven D.J. Baumann, Alexandra B. Cory, Micaela M. Krol, Elisa J. Piispa Updated March 2013 Oldest known rock showing a dipole magnetic field: red dacite in Austrailia Paleomagnetic Line 3,800 3,700 3,600 3,500 3,400 3,300 3,200 3,100 3,000 2,900 2,800 2,700 2,600 2,500 2,400 2,300 2,200 2,100 2,000 1,900 1,800 1,700 1,600 1,500 1,400 1,300 1,200 1,100 1,000 900 800 700 600 500 Paleozoic Period Siderian Rhyacian Orosirian Statherian Calymmian Ectasian Stenian Tonian Cryogenian Ediacaran Eoarchean Paleoarchean Mesoarchean Neoarchean Era Paleoproterozoic Mesoproterozoic Neoproterozoic Eon Archean Proterozoic Pass Lake Kama Hill Sibley Group Sediments (Sibley Basin, Thunder Bay Area, ON) McGrath Gneiss McGrath Complex (EC MN) Metamorphic and cataclastic event Formation Formation Outan Island Formation Nipigon Formation Recent Era of Great Mid-continent Basin Formation (MI, IL, IA, IN, KY, MO) 2 inches Marshfield Archean Gneiss (C WI) Linwood Archean Migmatite (C WI) Sudbury Dike Swarm (SE ON) Quinnesec Formation Intrusions (NE WI) Quinnesec Formation Metamorphism (NE WI) Hatfield Gneiss (WC WI) Pre-Quinnesec Formations deposited (NE WI) Upper Rove Formation Baraboo Quartzite LEGEND (Sibley Peninsula, Thunder Bay, ON) Gray granodioritic phase Montevideo Gneiss (SW MN) Red granite phase Montevideo Gneiss
    [Show full text]
  • Sea Lamprey Control in the Great Lakes 2016
    SEA LAMPREY CONTROL IN THE GREAT LAKES 2016 ANNUAL REPORT TO THE GREAT LAKES FISHERY COMMISSION Katherine Mullett U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Marquette, Michigan United States Paul Sullivan Fisheries and Oceans Canada Sault Ste. Marie, Ontario Canada GLFC Annual Meeting Duluth, Minnesota June 7-8, 2017 Cover: Larval Sea Lampreys being captured by USFWS Larval Assessment personnel with the use of backpack electroshocking units to determine population densities, age structure and larval distribution. (Photo USFWS) Patrick Wick (Physical Science Technician, USFWS) preparing a TFM application site on Stony Creek, a tributary to the East Branch Ontonagon River, during the Ontonagon River lampricide treatment in October 2016 (Photo by Chris Gagnon, USFWS). Table of Contents INTRODUCTION ......................................................................................................................................... 7 FISH-COMMUNITY OBJECTIVES ............................................................................................................ 8 Lake Superior .................................................................................................................................... 8 Lake Michigan .................................................................................................................................. 8 Lake Huron ....................................................................................................................................... 9 Lake Erie ..........................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Changes in Stratigraphic Nomenclature by the U.S. Geological Survey, 1978
    Changes in Stratigraphic Nomenclature by the U.S. Geological Survey, 1978 GEOLOGICAL SURVEY BULLETIN 1482-A Changes in Stratigraphic Nomenclature by the U.S. Geological Survey, 1978 By NORMAN F. SOHL andWILNA B. WRIGHT CONTRIBUTIONS TO STRATIGRAPHY GEOLOGICAL SURVEY BULLETIN 1482-A UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE, WASHINGTON : 1979 UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR CECIL D. ANDRUS, Secretary GEOLOGICAL SURVEY H. William Menard, Director Library of Congress Catalog-card No. 80-600040 For sale by Superintendent of Documents, LT.S. Government Printing Office Washington, D.C. 20402 Stock Number 024-001-03302-0 CONTENTS Page Introduction.............................................. Al Listing of nomenclatural changes............................... 3 References cited ........................................ 50 Stratigraphic revision of lower Pleistocene marine deposits of North and South Carolina, by Blake W. Black welder ............... 52 Beaucoup Formation, a new Upper Devonian stratigraphic unit in the central Brooks Range, northern Alaska, by J. Thomas Dutro, Jr., William P. Brosge', Hillard N. Reiser, and Robert L. Detterman ..................... 62 Stoney Fork Member (new name) of the Breathitt Formation in southeasternmost Kentucky, by Russell G. Ping and Charles L. Rice ...................................... 70 Age of Greylock Schist in western Massachusetts, by Nicholas M. Ratcliffe ................................... 77 Adoption and redefinition of the Sherman Marble and regional correlations of Plymouth- and Sherman-type
    [Show full text]
  • 9.914Mb Application/Pdf
    °0 .... .' . A C A S S • Aro Ar9 •• 4rg Hackensack - 4rg c . Arg N c McGregor / / / / / Geology modified from Plole I, Schmidt, 1963 EXPLANATION PENOKEAN ALGOMAN Mafic intrusive roc ks I :·:. ::·· ::··: ~ Mafic intrusive rocks t/;·/:·J °. 00 0 •• ° <.;,:,; Freedhem tonal i te ~ ~;;;~~f,~~ Gran i ti c intrusive ro cks l, n , ", ",_ .. I: : : :: :1H illman tonalite l::::::::1Giants Range granite P\:!iDJWorman monzonite o 8 16 24 M iles < ~.••..• v< Mc Grath gne iss ~====== ---- Probable western boundary of Middle Precambrian Rocks ..... Magnetic anomaly trend --- Trommold Formotion Figure IV-17. Generalized geologic map of the Cuyuna district and adjoining areas showing the locations of the Emily, North C uyuna, and South C uyuna ranges (modified from Schmidt, 1963). 226 MIDDLE PREC AMBRIAN CUYUNA DISTRICT Ralph W. Marsden The Cuyuna district is about 100 miles west-southwest ward-trending, generally parallel belts of iron-formation ex­ of Duluth, in Aitkin, Cass, Crow Wing, and Morrison tending from near Randall northeast for about 60 miles. In Counties, and is defined here to include the Emily, North, addition to the three named ranges, several linear magnetic and South iron ranges, inasmuch as the rocks in the three anomalies occur within the Cuyuna district that may indi­ areas are lithologically, stratigraphically, and structurally cate other, as yet unexplored, areas of iron-formation (fig. similar (fig. IV-I). The proposed boundaries for the Cuyuna IV-17). district differ from those used by Schmidt (1963), but are The geologic relations of the Precambrian rocks are ob­ consistent with those of Harder and Johnston (1918). The scured by a nearly complete blanket of glacial drift.
    [Show full text]
  • Minimum Age and Provenance of the Correlated Thomson and Rove Formations of Eastern Minnesota
    Kerber, L. 2006. 19th Annual Keck Symposium; http://keck.wooster.edu/publications MINIMUM AGE AND PROVENANCE OF THE CORRELATED THOMSON AND ROVE FORMATIONS OF EASTERN MINNESOTA LAURA KERBER Pomona College Sponsor: Robert Gaines INTRODUCTION and in other areas finely bedded argillite. The dominant phase is called a slate because the thin The correlated Thomson and Rove Formations beds have been recrystallized to the point that are exposed as heterogeneous formations they do not disintegrate to clay like common composed of greywacke, slate, sandstone, and shale slabs. They were deposited in a marine argillite in Northeastern Minnesota as part of environment and are characterized in places by the Animikie Group (Morey, 1970). Other turbidites (Morey, 1970). The top and bottom members of the group include the Kakabeka contacts of the Thomson are not exposed, and Pokegama Quartzites (mature quartz and the Rove is exposed in sections that have arenites made from quartz sand and mud with been pieced together to create the probable a basal conglomerate that separates it from the stratigraphy of the whole. The deposition of the underlying Lower Precambrian granites and Rove Formation has been dated previously to volcanic-sedimentary rocks of Northeastern 1836 + 5 Ma using ID-TIMS (isotope-dilution Minnesota) and The Biwabik Iron Formation thermal ionization mass spectrometer) on a (which underlies the Thomson Formation) single zircon and to a mean age of 1827 + 8 and the Gunflint Iron Formation (which Ma using SHRIMP (sensitive high-resolution underlies the Rove Formation) (Ojakangas, ion microprobe) for 15 analyses. All of the 2004). The Thomson and Rove Formations zircons for these analyses were obtained are overlain unconformably by Keweenawan from interbedded tuff layers (Kissin, 2003).
    [Show full text]
  • ATLAS of the SPAWNING and NURSERY AREAS of GREAT LAKES FISHES Volume II - Lake Superior
    Biological Services Program FWS/OBS-82/52 SEPTEMBER 1982 ATLAS OF THE SPAWNING AND NURSERY AREAS OF GREAT LAKES FISHES Volume II - Lake Superior Great Lake - St. Lawrence Seaway Navigation Season Extension Program Fish and Wildlife Service Corps of Engineers U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Department of the Army The Biological Services Program was established within the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service to supply scientific information and methodologies on key environmental issues that Impact fish and wildlife resources and their supporting ecosystems. The mission of the program is as follows: o To strengthen the Fish and Wildlife Service in its role as a primary source of information on national fish and wild- life resources, particularly in respect to environmental impact assessment. o To gather, analyze, and present information that will aid decisionmakers in the identification and resolution of problems associated with major changes in land and water use. o To provide better ecological information and evaluation for Department of the Interior development programs, such as those relatfng to energy development. Information developed by the Biological Services Program is intended for use in the planning and decisionmaking process to prevent or minimize the impact of development on fish and wildlife. Research activities and technlcal assistance services are based on an analysis of the issues, a determination of the decisionmakers involved and their informatlon needs, and an evaluation of the state of the art to identify information gaps and to determine priorities. This is a strategy that will ensure that the products produced and disseminated are timely and useful.
    [Show full text]