DOCSLIB.ORG

Henvey Inlet Wind Appendix

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

Henvey Inlet Wind LP Henvey Inlet Wind Transmission Line Appendix B9. Route A Cultural Heritage Assessment Report Henvey Inlet Wind LP Henvey Inlet Wind Cultural Heritage Assessment Report Transmission Line – Route A Unorganized Townships of Mowat, and Blair, District of Parry Sound, Ontario Prepared by: AECOM 410 – 250 York Street, Citi Plaza 519 673 0510 tel London, ON, Canada N6A 6K2 519 673 5975 fax www.aecom.com Project Number: 60341251 Date: August 2015 Henvey Inlet Wind LP Henvey Inlet Wind Cultural Heritage Assessment Report Transmission Line – Route A Statement of Qualifications and Limitations The attached Report (the “Report”) has been prepared by AECOM Canada Ltd. (“Consultant”) for the benefit of the client (“Client”) in accordance with the agreement between Consultant and Client, including the scope of work detailed therein (the “Agreement”). The information, data, recommendations and conclusions contained in the Report (collectively, the “Information”): is subject to the scope, schedule, and other constraints and limitations in the Agreement and the qualifications contained in the Report (the “Limitations”); represents Consultant’s professional judgement in light of the Limitations and industry standards for the preparation of similar reports; may be based on information provided to Consultant which has not been independently verified; has not been updated since the date of issuance of the Report and its accuracy is limited to the time period and circumstances in which it was collected, processed, made or issued; must be read as a whole and sections thereof should not be read out of such context; was prepared for the specific purposes described in the Report and the Agreement; and in the case of subsurface, environmental or geotechnical conditions, may be based on limited testing and on the assumption that such conditions are uniform and not variable either geographically or over time. Consultant shall be entitled to rely upon the accuracy and completeness of information that was provided to it and has no obligation to update such information. Consultant accepts no responsibility for any events or circumstances that may have occurred since the date on which the Report was prepared and, in the case of subsurface, environmental or geotechnical conditions, is not responsible for any variability in such conditions, geographically or over time. Consultant agrees that the Report represents its professional judgement as described above and that the Information has been prepared for the specific purpose and use described in the Report and the Agreement, but Consultant makes no other representations, or any guarantees or warranties whatsoever, whether express or implied, with respect to the Report, the Information or any part thereof. Without in any way limiting the generality of the foregoing, any estimates or opinions regarding probable construction costs or construction schedule provided by Consultant represent Consultant’s professional judgement in light of its experience and the knowledge and information available to it at the time of preparation. Since Consultant has no control over market or economic conditions, prices for construction labour, equipment or materials or bidding procedures, Consultant, its directors, officers and employees are not able to, nor do they, make any representations, warranties or guarantees whatsoever, whether express or implied, with respect to such estimates or opinions, or their variance from actual construction costs or schedules, and accept no responsibility for any loss or damage arising therefrom or in any way related thereto. Persons relying on such estimates or opinions do so at their own risk. Except (1) as agreed to in writing by Consultant and Client; (2) as required by-law; or (3) to the extent used by governmental reviewing agencies for the purpose of obtaining permits or approvals, the Report and the Information may be used and relied upon only by Client. Consultant accepts no responsibility, and denies any liability whatsoever, to parties other than Client who may obtain access to the Report or the Information for any injury, loss or damage suffered by such parties arising from their use of, reliance upon, or decisions or actions based on the Report or any of the Information (“improper use of the Report”), except to the extent those parties have obtained the prior written consent of Consultant to use and rely upon the Report and the Information. Any injury, loss or damages arising from improper use of the Report shall be borne by the party making such use. This Statement of Qualifications and Limitations is attached to and forms part of the Report and any use of the Report is subject to the terms hereof. AECOM: 2012-01-06 © 2009-2012 AECOM Canada Ltd. All Rights Reserved. B-B-B09_Appb9_Cult_Route A_T-Line_2015-08-26_60341251 Henvey Inlet Wind LP Henvey Inlet Wind Cultural Heritage Assessment Report Transmission Line – Route A AECOM Signatures Report Prepared By: Jennifer Morgan, PhD Researcher and Laboratory Manager Report Reviewed By: Adria Grant, BA, CAHP Business Operations Manager Cultural Resources B-B-B09_Appb9_Cult_Route A_T-Line_2015-08-26_60341251 Henvey Inlet Wind LP Henvey Inlet Wind Cultural Heritage Assessment Report Transmission Line – Route A Executive Summary This Cultural Heritage Assessment Report (CHAR) has been prepared to provide information regarding cultural heritage to the public, First Nation communities, municipalities, and agencies with respect to the Henvey Inlet Wind Energy Centre (HIWEC), a 300 megawatt (MW) wind energy generation centre on Henvey Inlet First Nation Reserve No. 2 (HIFN I.R. #2). The HIWEC is being jointly developed by Nigig Power Corporation (NPC), incorporated by Henvey Inlet First Nation (HIFN), and Pattern Renewable Holdings Canada, ULC (Pattern Development). Two transmission lines (Route A and B) are being proposed to bring the power generated from the HIWEC to the Ontario electricity grid. Only one option will be constructed. This report is for Route A only. The Transmission Line Route A study area is located off-reserve in the unorganized Townships of Mowat and Blair in the District of Parry Sound. The HIWEC Transmission Line – Route A study area is comprised of a corridor of land 100 m wide and approximately 16 kilometres (km) east-west. The study area extends from Highway 69 at HIFN I.R. #2 east to the existing 500 kV Hydro One Networks Inc. (HONI) transmission line; approximately 75% of the study area is adjacent to Highway 522. The study area is primarily located on Crown-owned or managed lands with lesser portions of privately owned land, in a relatively remote area. The landscape consists mainly of wooded and wet areas that are characteristic of Canadian Shield terrain. This assessment only pertains to off-reserve land. The on-reserve portion of the Transmission Line - Route A is incorporated within the HIFN EA process. The HIFN EA process has similar requirements for cultural heritage assessments as wind energy projects elsewhere in Ontario; however, Ontario Ministry of Tourism, Culture and Sport (MTCS) acceptance is not required as this is federal land. The off-reserve Transmission Line corridor is subject to a Category B Environmental Review as described in the Ministry of the Environment and Climate Change’s Guide to Environmental Assessment Requirements for Electricity Projects (2011), outlined in O.Reg 116/01, Electricity Projects Regulation. An overview of the Transmission Line – Route A study area location is provided in Figure 1, and a detailed map of the Transmission Line – Route A study area is provided in Figure 2. No listed, designated or otherwise recognized heritage features are present within the study area. In addition there are no historic plaques, cemeteries, national historic sites or properties protected by an Ontario Heritage Trust Easement. A property survey was undertaken to evaluate built heritage and cultural heritage landscapes present in the study area, and an inventory was created to identify and evaluate potential heritage resources. The study area is primarily comprised of Canadian Shield landscape and transportation landscapes that are typical for this region of Ontario. These landscapes were evaluated against the criteria in Ontario Regulation 9/06 and it was determined that they are not considered to retain cultural heritage value or interest due to their typical nature in the region. Through the windshield survey, three sites 40 years of age or older were documented and evaluated according to Ontario Regulation 09/06 and three structures were identified, including a residential structure and two outbuildings. Of these sites, the residence (Property #1) and one of the outbuildings (Property #2) were identified to have potential cultural heritage value or interest. Potential direct or indirect impacts to these cultural heritage resources were evaluated according to the criteria outlined in InfoSheet #5 in Heritage Resources in the Land Use Planning Process, Cultural Heritage and Archaeology Policies of the Ontario Provincial Policy Statement 2005. No negative impacts to cultural heritage resources are anticipated by the project. As there are no impacts to heritage resources anticipated as a result of the project, mitigation is not required. B-B-B09_Appb9_Cult_Route A_T-Line_2015-08-26_60341251 i Henvey Inlet Wind LP Henvey Inlet Wind Cultural Heritage Assessment Report Transmission Line – Route A Table of Contents Statement of Qualifications and Limitations Letter of
Recommended publications
  • The Evolving Muskoka Vacation Experience 1860-1945 by Geoffrey

    The Evolving Muskoka Vacation Experience 1860-1945 by Geoffrey

    The Evolving Muskoka Vacation Experience 1860-1945 by Geoffrey Shifflett A thesis presented to the University of Waterloo in fulfillment of the thesis requirement for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in Geography Waterloo, Ontario, Canada, 2012 © Geoffrey Shifflett 2012 Author’s Declaration I hereby declare that I am the sole author of this thesis. This is a true copy of the thesis, including any required final revisions, as accepted by my examiners. I understand that my thesis may be made electronically available to the public. ii Abstract This dissertation examines the development of tourism in Muskoka in the Canadian Shield region from 1860 to 1945. Three key themes are examined: the tourists, the resorts and projected image of the area. When taken together, they provide insight into the origin and evolution of the meanings attached to tourist destinations in the Canadian Shield. The Muskoka Lakes region provides the venue in which continuity and change in each of these elements of the tourism landscape are explored. This dissertation uses previously underutilized primary source materials ranging from hotel ledgers, financial reports, personal correspondence, period brochures, guidebooks, and contemporary newspaper articles to reconstruct the Muskoka tourist experience over an extended period of time. The volume of literature pertaining to American tourism history significantly outweighs similar work conducted on Canadian destinations. This dissertation, therefore, begins with an overview of key works related to the historical development of tourism in the United States followed by a survey of corresponding Canadian literature. The lack of an analytical structure in many tourist historical works is identified as a methodological gap in the literature.
  • The Grounding of the Imperial St. Clair- a Case History of Contending with Oil in Ice

    The Grounding of the Imperial St. Clair- a Case History of Contending with Oil in Ice

    THE GROUNDING OF THE IMPERIAL ST. CLAIR- A CASE HISTORY OF CONTENDING WITH OIL IN ICE Capt. C. J. Beckett Canadian Coast Guard Central Region, Transport Canada Downloaded from http://meridian.allenpress.com/iosc/article-pdf/1979/1/371/1738288/2169-3358-1979-1-371.pdf by guest on 28 September 2021 Toronto, Ontario, Canada M5E1E5 ABSTRACT: During mid-morning on December 23, 1976, the oil the seaway, these ice strengthened vessels could be transferred to the products tanker Imperial St. Clair, carrying over 10,400 tons of cargo, work of re-supplying the Canadian Arctic grounded in the approaches to Parry Sound. Located on the eastern With the advent of winter navigation in the Great Lakes it was evi- shores of Georgian Bay in Lake Huron, this port is a central depot dent that only particular vessels would be able to navigate the frozen supplying a large hinterland with petroleum. lakes and that cargoes would have to be quite selective. Consequently, At the time of grounding, new winter ice was present in varying the older vessels selected for use where navigation was possible in the thicknesses and temperatures and winds varied from day to day, carriage of high grade ores were generally the "hard nosers." These resulting in very difficult conditions in which to effect operations. were vessels built with a single stem bar not rounded and "soft" as An estimated 57,000 gallons of diesel fuel and gasoline was lost dur- many of the new bulk carriers. New vessels were designed with heavier ing the initial impact and later during oil transfer operations.
  • C94) and Lower Moon River Conservation Reserve (C90

    C94) and Lower Moon River Conservation Reserve (C90

    Moon River Conservation Reserve (C94) and Lower Moon River Conservation Reserve (C90) Statement of Conservation Interest March 2005 Moon River Conservation Reserve (C94) and Lower Moon River Conservation Reserve (C90) Statement of Conservation Interest Ministry of Natural Resources Parry Sound District Prepared with the assistance of: Meteek & Company Huntsville, Ontario March 2005 i Approval Statement We are pleased to approve this Statement of Conservation Interest for Moon River Conservation Reserve (C94) and Lower Moon River Conservation Reserve (C90). Together these two conservation reserves provide protection for approximately 15 kilometres of diverse habitats along the Moon River, from just west of Highway 400 (formerly Highway 69) to Arnolds Bay and The Massasauga Provincial Park on the Georgian Bay shoreline. Moon River Conservation Reserve (C94) is the upstream component of these two protected areas. It consists of 457 hectares of Crown land, located in southern Freeman Ward in the Area Municipality of Georgian Bay, in the District of Muskoka. The site is approximately seven kilometres southwest of the hamlet of Mactier. At its closest point on the east it is about ½ kilometre west of Highway 400, and it abuts Lower Moon River Conservation Reserve at its west boundary. This conservation reserve, located in Hills’ ecological Site District 5E-7, includes steep rocky slopes and low cliffs on the Moon River. The surrounding uplands support representative sugar maple and old hemlock forests growing on gently sloping hills with shallow sandy soils or bare bedrock. It provides habitat for the nationally threatened eastern Massasauga rattlesnake and the threatened eastern hog- nosed snake. Lower Moon River Conservation Reserve (C90) is a 2723 hectare area of Crown land, located about 10 kilometres due west of the hamlet of Mactier.
  • A Selected Bibliography of Sources Related to Cobourg, Lake Muskoka

    A Selected Bibliography of Sources Related to Cobourg, Lake Muskoka

    A Selected Bibliography of Sources Related to Cobourg, Muskoka, and Lake of the Woods, Ontario, and Their U.S. Visitors Cobourg, Ontario (Photo by Marsha Ann Tate) Compiled by Marsha Ann Tate, PhD Tate Research & Training Services Email: [email protected] Originally compiled May 2007; Last updated July 5, 2014 A Selected Bibliography of Sources Related to Cobourg, Muskoka, and Lake of the Woods, Ontario, and Their U.S. Visitors Contents Introduction 3 Archives, Libraries, and Museums 4 Maps and Atlases 8 Photographs 9 Demographic Statistics 11 Government Documents 12 Theses 13 Books and Book Chapters 14 Journal, Magazine, and Newsletter Articles 22 Conference and Working Papers 29 Speech and Interview Transcripts 31 Newspaper Articles 32 Pamphlets, Brochures, and Advertisements 39 Web-based Resources 41 Page 2 A Selected Bibliography of Sources Related to Cobourg, Muskoka, and Lake of the Woods, Ontario, and Their U.S. Visitors Introduction The following is a selected bibliography of sources related to Cobourg, Rice Lake, Lake Muskoka, and the Lake of the Woods regions of Ontario, in addition to U.S. visitors to the respective areas. The time period covered by the sources ranges from the late eighteenth century through the first half of the twentieth century. Arrangement of Entries The bibliography is arranged into the following sections: (a) Archives, Libraries, and museums; (b) Maps and Atlases; (c) Photographs; (d) Population and Other Demographic Statistics; (e) Government Publications; (f) Theses; (g) Books and Book Chapters; (h) Maps and Atlases; (i) Journal, Magazine, and Newsletter Articles; (j) Conference and Working Papers; (k) Speech and Interview Transcripts; (l) Newspaper Articles; (m) Pamphlets, Brochures, and Advertisements; and (n) Web-based Resources.
  • PO Box 129, 1 Bailey Street, Port Carling, Ontario, P0B 1J0 Tel: 705-765-3156 Fax: 705-765-6755 Website

    PO Box 129, 1 Bailey Street, Port Carling, Ontario, P0B 1J0 Tel: 705-765-3156 Fax: 705-765-6755 Website

    PO Box 129, 1 Bailey Street, Port Carling, Ontario, P0B 1J0 Tel: 705-765-3156 Fax: 705-765-6755 Website: www.muskokalakes.ca 2011 INDEX Greetings from the Mayor 3 Contact Information 4 Township Structure 5 Township History 5 Township Geography 6 Municipal Officials 6 Municipal Representatives 7 Area and Population 8 Demographics 10 Services 12 Marine Information 16 Places of Worship 16 Municipal Cemeteries 17 Emergency Services 18 Medical Services 19 Township Departments 20 Garbage & Recycling 23 Sewage & Water Treatment 23 Transportation 24 Education 25 Weather 28 Communications 29 Map of the Township of Muskoka Lakes 30 Statistics Canada information is used with the permission of Statistics Canada. Users are forbidden to copy the data and redisseminate them, in an original or modified form, for commercial purposes, without permission from Statistics Canada. Information on the availability of the wide range of data from Statistics Canada can be obtained from Statistics Canada's Regional Offices, its World Wide Web site at www.statcan.ca, and its toll-free access number 1-800-263-1136. *Statistics will be updated when further Census information is released.* Welcome What a privilege it is for me to be the Mayor of the Township of Muskoka Lakes, and to welcome you to our community and services. Muskoka Lakes is an amazing place to both live and visit. We are home to 80 lakes and our opportunities to really embrace the outdoors are endless, including terrific trails, boating, swimming, fishing, golfing and cycling. Layered on to our outdoor tapestry is an ever expanding and extremely vibrant visual and performing arts community.
  • Army Or Navy During the European War. an Application for 100 Acres of Land Under These Conditions May Be Sent Either to the Soldier Settlement Board of Canada at St

    Army Or Navy During the European War. an Application for 100 Acres of Land Under These Conditions May Be Sent Either to the Soldier Settlement Board of Canada at St

    658 ADMINISTRATION army or navy during the European War. An application for 100 acres of land under these conditions may be sent either to the Soldier Settlement Board of Canada at St. John, N.B., or to the Deputy Minister of Lands and Mines at Fredericton, N.B. In Quebec the area of public lands subdivided and unsold on June 30, 1919, was 6,330,751 acres. During the year ended June 30, 1920, 157,682 acres were surveyed; 120,761 acres reverted to the Crown and 87,216 acres were acquired through exchanges; 197,410 acres were sold, the receipts, including arrears, being $146,398. Adding to the acreage available at June 30, 1919, the areas surveyed and the areas that reverted and deducting sales and grants, there remained subdivided and unsold on June 30, 1920, 6,499,000 acres. Agricul­ tural lands in 100 acre lots are available for settlement upon prescribed conditions at the price of 60 cents per acre. In Ontario the public lands which are open for disposal are chiefly situated in the districts of Muskoka, Parry Sound, Nipissing, Sudbury, Algoma, Timiskaming, Thunder Bay, Kenora and Rainy River, and in the counties of Haliburton, Peterborough, Hastings, Frontenac, Lennox and Addington and Renfrew. In northern Ontario, which comprises the territory lying north and west of the Ottawa and French rivers, the townships open for sale are subdivided into lots of 320 acres, or sections of 640 acres, and a half lot or quarter section of 160 acres is allowed to each applicant at the price of 50 cents per acre, payable one-fourth cash and the balance in three annual instalments with interest at 6 p.c.
  • 2016 Parry Sound/Muskoka IRRP

    2016 Parry Sound/Muskoka IRRP

    PARRY SOUND / MUSKOKA SUB-REGION INTEGRATED REGIONAL RESOURCE PLAN Part of the South Georgian Bay/Muskoka Planning Region | December 16, 2016 Integrated Regional Resource Plan Parry Sound/Muskoka This Integrated Regional Resource Plan (“IRRP”) was prepared by the Independent Electricity System Operator (“IESO”) pursuant to the terms of its Ontario Energy Board electricity licence, EI-2013-0066. This IRRP was prepared on behalf of the Parry Sound/Muskoka Sub-region Working Group (the “Working Group”), which included the following members: • Independent Electricity System Operator • Hydro One Networks Inc. (Distribution) • Hydro One Networks Inc. (Transmission) • Lakeland Power Distribution Ltd. • Midland Power Utility Corporation • Newmarket-Tay Power Distribution Ltd. • Orillia Power Distribution Corporation • PowerStream Inc. • Veridian Connections Inc. The Working Group assessed the reliability of electricity supply to customers in the Parry Sound/Muskoka Sub-region over a 20-year period; developed a flexible, comprehensive, integrated plan that considers opportunities for coordination in anticipation of potential demand growth scenarios and varying supply conditions in the Parry Sound/Muskoka Sub- region; and developed recommended actions, while maintaining flexibility in order to accommodate changes in key assumptions over time. The Working Group members agree with the IRRP’s recommendations and support implementation of the plan, subject to obtaining necessary regulatory approvals and appropriate community consultations. Copyright
  • The Canadian Parliamentary Guide

    The Canadian Parliamentary Guide

    NUNC COGNOSCO EX PARTE THOMAS J. BATA LI BRARY TRENT UNIVERSITY us*<•-« m*.•• ■Jt ,.v<4■■ L V ?' V t - ji: '^gj r ", •W* ~ %- A V- v v; _ •S I- - j*. v \jrfK'V' V ■' * ' ’ ' • ’ ,;i- % »v • > ». --■ : * *S~ ' iJM ' ' ~ : .*H V V* ,-l *» %■? BE ! Ji®». ' »- ■ •:?■, M •* ^ a* r • * «'•# ^ fc -: fs , I v ., V', ■ s> f ** - l' %% .- . **» f-•" . ^ t « , -v ' *$W ...*>v■; « '.3* , c - ■ : \, , ?>?>*)■#! ^ - ••• . ". y(.J, ■- : V.r 4i .» ^ -A*.5- m “ * a vv> w* W,3^. | -**■ , • * * v v'*- ■ ■ !\ . •* 4fr > ,S<P As 5 - _A 4M ,' € - ! „■:' V, ' ' ?**■- i.." ft 1 • X- \ A M .-V O' A ■v ; ■ P \k trf* > i iwr ^.. i - "M - . v •?*»-• -£-. , v 4’ >j- . *•. , V j,r i 'V - • v *? ■ •.,, ;<0 / ^ . ■'■ ■ ,;• v ,< */ ■" /1 ■* * *-+ ijf . ^--v- % 'v-a <&, A * , % -*£, - ^-S*.' J >* •> *' m' . -S' ?v * ... ‘ *•*. * V .■1 *-.«,»'• ■ 1**4. * r- * r J-' ; • * “ »- *' ;> • * arr ■ v * v- > A '* f ' & w, HSi.-V‘ - .'">4-., '4 -' */ ' -',4 - %;. '* JS- •-*. - -4, r ; •'ii - ■.> ¥?<* K V' V ;' v ••: # * r * \'. V-*, >. • s s •*•’ . “ i"*■% * % «. V-- v '*7. : '""•' V v *rs -*• * * 3«f ' <1k% ’fc. s' ^ * ' .W? ,>• ■ V- £ •- .' . $r. « • ,/ ••<*' . ; > -., r;- •■ •',S B. ' F *. ^ , »» v> ' ' •' ' a *' >, f'- \ r ■* * is #* ■ .. n 'K ^ XV 3TVX’ ■■i ■% t'' ■ T-. / .a- ■ '£■ a« .v * tB• f ; a' a :-w;' 1 M! : J • V ^ ’ •' ■ S ii 4 » 4^4•M v vnU :^3£'" ^ v .’'A It/-''-- V. - ;ii. : . - 4 '. ■ ti *%?'% fc ' i * ■ , fc ' THE CANADIAN PARLIAMENTARY GUIDE AND WORK OF GENERAL REFERENCE I9OI FOR CANADA, THE PROVINCES, AND NORTHWEST TERRITORIES (Published with the Patronage of The Parliament of Canada) Containing Election Returns, Eists and Sketches of Members, Cabinets of the U.K., U.S., and Canada, Governments and Eegisla- TURES OF ALL THE PROVINCES, Census Returns, Etc.
  • CELEBRATING LOCAL AGRI-FOOD Local Food Week June 3 to 9

    CELEBRATING LOCAL AGRI-FOOD Local Food Week June 3 to 9

    CELEBRATING LOCAL AGRI-FOOD Local Food Week June 3 to 9 JUNE 2018 Grey County Economic Development | Made in Grey | MadeInGrey.ca CONTENTS Greetings from Grey.................... 2 Grey Continues to Grow.............. 4 Business Enterprise Centre........ 6 Hawks’ Nest................................. 8 Recolour Grey.............................. 10 Bluewater Angels........................ 11 OYAP........................................... 12 LaunchPad.................................. 15 The Blue Mountains.................... 16 Hanover....................................... 20 Bluewater Wood Alliance............ 23 West Grey.................................... 24 Southgate.................................... 27 Grey County Tourism.................. 32 GREETINGS FROM GREY! Owen Sound............................... 34 Grey County Summer Students 2018 Meaford....................................... 36 Grey Highlands........................... 38 Georgian College........................ 40 THE TIME IS NOW Excellence in Manufacturing Consortium.................................. 42 TO BE YOUNG IN GREY Local Agri-Food Feature............. 44 The sun is shining, the weather is warming, Grey is greening and our Boots on the Ground................... 56 summer students have arrived! Grey County is fortunate to welcome 2018 Top 10 Events.................... 58 summer students across almost all departments – from tourism and Contacts...................................... 59 economic development to transportation, human resources, information technology,
  • Club Activities

    Club Activities

    Volume 41, Number 3 March – April 2007 Club Activities Indoor: Meetings begin at 7:30 pm on the second Tuesday of the month, October to June at St. Andrew’s United Church, 89 Mountainview Road South (at Sinclair) in Georgetown unless stated otherwise. Feb. 13: Central and South America, and the Bruce Peninsula. Bev Whatmough will be giving a presentation on some of the flora and fauna, and a look at the new Bruce Peninsula Park and Fathom Five Park interpretive centre. Mar. 13: Re-introduction of Elk into Ontario. Meagan Hazell will speak about her research on the release of large ruminants into Ontario Apr. 10: Halton Natural Areas Inventory. Andrea Dunn, Conservation Halton, will be talking on the results of the Sixteen Mile Creek Monitoring Study. Andrea was the coordinator of the project. Outdoor: Trips begin at the Niagara Escarpment Commission (NEC) parking lot at Guelph and Mountainview Road, Georgetown, unless stated otherwise. If you would like to meet the group at the trip site, please speak to the trip leader for the location and directions to the starting point. Jan. 21: Burlington Waterfowl. Meet 8:00 am. In case of inclement weather, check ahead with the trip leaders, Kelly Bowen and Andrew Kellman (905) 873-7338 Feb.18: Butterfly Conservatory, Niagara Falls, Ontario. Meet at the NEC parking lot at 8:00 am, or at the conservatory at about 9:30 am. Admission is $11 for adults. This should be a great opportunity to photograph butterflies and get a winter taste of the tropics! Depending on the weather and the group’s interests we may do some birding along the Niagara River or Lake Ontario in the afternoon.
  • Annual Report 1942, Volume 51, Part II

    Annual Report 1942, Volume 51, Part II

    THESE TERMS GOVERN YOUR USE OF THIS PRODUCT Your use of this electronic information product (“EIP”), and the digital data files contained on it (the “Content”), is governed by the terms set out on this page (“Terms of Use”). By opening the EIP and viewing the Content , you (the “User”) have accepted, and have agreed to be bound by, the Terms of Use. EIP and Content: This EIP and Content is offered by the Province of Ontario’s Ministry of Northern Development, Mines and Forestry (MNDMF) as a public service, on an “as-is” basis. Recommendations and statements of opinions expressed are those of the author or authors and are not to be construed as statement of government policy. You are solely responsible for your use of the EIP and its Content. You should not rely on the Content for legal advice nor as authoritative in your particular circumstances. Users should verify the accuracy and applicability of any Content before acting on it. MNDMF does not guarantee, or make any warranty express or implied, that the Content is current, accurate, complete or reliable or that the EIP is free from viruses or other harmful components. MNDMF is not responsible for any damage however caused, which results, directly or indirectly, from your use of the EIP or the Content. MNDMF assumes no legal liability or responsibility for the EIP or the Content whatsoever. Links to Other Web Sites: This EIP or the Content may contain links, to Web sites that are not operated by MNDMF. Linked Web sites may not be available in French.
  • District of Parry Sound Demographic Profile

    District of Parry Sound Demographic Profile

    District of Parry Sound Demographic Profile 2011 Census of Population Developed in partnership with District of Parry Sound Community Development Collaborative April, 2013 TABLE OF CONTENTS LIST OF TABLES AND FIGURES ..................................................................................................................... 3 INTRODUCTION ........................................................................................................................................... 5 REPORT PURPOSE ....................................................................................................................................... 5 METHODOLOGY .......................................................................................................................................... 6 REPORT PRODUCTION ................................................................................................................................ 6 NOTES ......................................................................................................................................................... 6 KEY FINDINGS.............................................................................................................................................. 8 Population............................................................................................................................................... 8 Age and Sex............................................................................................................................................