DOCSLIB.ORG

The Logic of Eip Agri

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
The Logic of Eip Agri March 2014 MSC THESIS THE LOGIC OF EIP AGRI Building Innovation Through Adaptive Governance | Koert Verkerk 1 2 MSc THESIS The Logic of EIP agri Building Innovation Through Adaptive Governance March 2014 C.J. (Koert) Verkerk, BSc Supervisor: Dr. G.E. (Gerard) Breeman, assistant professor Public Administration and Policy, Wageningen University Second reader: Prof. C.J.A.M. (Katrien) Termeer, professor Public Administration and Policy, Wageningen University 3 4 Abstract The European Innovation Partnership for agricultural productivity and sustainability aims to contrib- ute to the agricultural sector by supporting innovation. As new policy measure under the CAP provi- sions it aims to close the gap between farming practice and (applied) research. By doing so, the EIP agri can help actors to better fulfil the innovation process, from the phase of identifying a problem to the phase of dissemination of knowledge. Innovation processes are difficult processes to steer be- cause of the many actors involved and the many interests of those actors. The theory of adaptive governance can be used to understand complex processes such as innovation processes. The key characteristics of adaptive governance, being resilience, multi stakeholder involvement, multi-level governance and room for experimentation are appropriate elements to analyse innovation proc- esses. At first sight, the EIP agri seems to contain these notions of adaptive governance. However, by conducting an extensive participatory observation and an expert workshop, it became clear that still some problems need to be encountered. Possible solutions to these problems were discussed when the theory was applied to practice. In order to make the EIP a good functioning policy, it appears to be essential to better understand the behaviour of the actors involved. In innovation processes, ac- tors are not only driven by goal seeking behaviour but their behaviour should also be understood by a logic of adaptability. This logic takes into account the context in which (innovation) processes take place. By doing so it becomes better possible to explain and steer processes of innovation. 5 6 Preface & acknowledgements Innovation is a word used in many contexts although little understood. What is innovation? How can it contribute to society? In agriculture, innovation is considered of high importance by many people. However, when talking to farmers, the ones really performing agriculture, innovation was, and still is, often a vague concept. But this situation is changing. The agricultural sector is facing many chal- lenges, of which the largest is providing food for nine billion people in 2050. In accomplishing this, developments need to take place in production methods of this sector. This is when innovation comes in, introducing processes of development and change. New European agricultural policy tries to stimulate innovation. The European Innovation Partnership for agricultural productivity and sus- tainability (EIP agri) aims to close the gap between research and practice. By doing so the challenges faced by European agriculture should be tackled. This thesis aims to provide an insight in the opera- tions of the EIP agri in order to develop the concept further and such contribute to innovation in Europe’s agricultural sector. I have written this thesis as part of my masters’ education at Wageningen University. The EIP was and is a subject in which I operated for one and a half years. As a trainee at LTO Nederland I got the opportunity to contribute to the development of the EIP agri, both in Brussels and in the Nether- lands. I would therefore like to thank Luc Groot, Klaas Johan Osinga and Wijnie van Eck for providing me this opportunity, you have been great colleagues! During my work for LTO I met many interesting people, thanks to all of them I got the chance to develop my thinking about the EIP agri but also to develop myself. In particular I want to thank Inge van Oost, Annemiek Canjels, Jan van Esch and Henk Kieft. Not only did you cooperate with me during my work, you also participated, together with Klaas Johan Osinga, in the workshop I organised in order to collect data for this thesis. Writing a thesis has not always been an easy process for me, ‘practicing science’ is something of which I got the feeling sometimes that I would never learn. However with the constant support of Gerard Breeman I did manage to finalise this product! Even after three courses, an internship and two theses you managed to teach me new things, thanks a lot for that. I would also like to thank Katrien Termeer for being the second reader of this thesis and closely following the process. Jolien, you have been a great support by helping me finalising this thesis, your comments and work has been of great, great value. Many thanks to Siem Korver; he opened many doors for me during my study. Despite the difficult times momentarily I hope we can work together for still many years to come and you will again get to enjoy the good things in life very soon. Finalising this preface I still need to thank three people. My parents, for your support, in every way and by all means possible. And Debby, for your help with this thesis and everything, always. Koert Verkerk Rhenen - March, 2014 7 Content Abstract ..............................................................................................................................................5 Preface & acknowledgements .............................................................................................................7 1 Introduction .............................................................................................................................. 12 2 Research framework ................................................................................................................. 14 2.1 Structure ........................................................................................................................... 14 2.1.1 Desk study ................................................................................................................. 14 2.1.2 Empirical research ..................................................................................................... 15 2.2 Methodology ..................................................................................................................... 16 2.2.1 Ex-ante policy evaluation ........................................................................................... 16 2.2.2 EIP expert workshop .................................................................................................. 16 2.2.3 Participatory observation ........................................................................................... 17 2.2.4 Hermeneutics ............................................................................................................ 18 2.2.5 Analysis of the empirical data .................................................................................... 20 2.2.6 Dutch focus in European policy .................................................................................. 20 3 Desk study ................................................................................................................................ 21 3.1 Innovation ......................................................................................................................... 21 3.1.1 Types of innovation.................................................................................................... 21 3.1.2 Evolutionary Economics ............................................................................................. 22 3.1.3 Innovation Models ..................................................................................................... 23 3.1.4 Actors ........................................................................................................................ 26 3.1.5 Conclusion ................................................................................................................. 29 3.2 Innovation as adaptive process .......................................................................................... 30 3.2.1 Adaptability ............................................................................................................... 30 3.2.2 Governance ............................................................................................................... 30 3.2.3 Adaptive governance and innovation ......................................................................... 31 3.2.4 Conclusion ................................................................................................................. 33 3.3 The European Innovation Partnership for ‘Agricultural Productivity and Sustainability’ ...... 34 3.3.1 European context ...................................................................................................... 34 3.3.2 European Innovation Partnership ‘Agricultural Productivity and Sustainability’ .......... 35 3.4 EIP agri & adaptive governance ......................................................................................... 44 4 Empirical Research ................................................................................................................... 48 4.1 Participatory observation .................................................................................................. 48 4.1.1 Traineeship in Brussels ..............................................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • 4. Misja Powierzona Posłowi 5. Oficjalne Powitanie 6. Skład Komisji
    C 27 E/2 Dziennik Urzędowy Unii Europejskiej PL 31.1.2008 Środa, 28 marca 2007 r. 4. Misja powierzona posłowi Przewodniczący poinformował, że premier Republiki Czeskiej poinformował go, iż nominował Jana Zahra- dila do reprezentowania go podczas konsultacji dotyczących deklaracji berlińskiej oraz, szerzej we wznowie- niu procesu konstytucyjnego w trakcie prezydencji niemieckiej Unii. Komisja Prawna, poproszona zgodnie z art. 4 ust. 5 Regulaminu o wydanie opinii, uznała na swoim posie- dzeniu w dniach 19 i 20 marca 2007 r., że misja jest zgodna z literą i duchem Aktu dotyczącego wyboru członków Parlamentu Europejskiego w powszechnych wyborach bezpośrednich oraz, że w związku z tym Jan Zahradil nie jest w sytuacji niezgodności i może wykonywać swój mandat poselski. 5. Oficjalne powitanie W imieniu Parlamentu Przewodniczący przywitał delegację z parlamentu irackiego, pod przewodnictwem Hamida Mousa, który zajął miejsce na trybunie honorowej. 6. Skład komisji i delegacji Przewodniczący otrzymał od grup PPE-DE, PSE, ALDE i posłów niezrzeszonych wnioski w sprawie nastę- pujących nominacji: — komisja AFET: Ria Oomen-Ruijten — komisja INTA: Corien Wortmann-Kool zamiast Alberta Jana Maata — komisja CONT: Ruth Hieronymi zamiast Vito Bonsignore — komisja REGI: Wolfgang Bulfon zamiast Giulietto Chiesa — komisja PECH: Joop Post zamiast Alberta Jana Maata — komisja JURI: Giulietto Chiesa zamiast Wolfganga Bulfona — komisja LIBE: Albert Jan Maat zamiast Ria Oomen-Ruijten — komisja FEMM: Albert Jan Maat zamiast CorienWortmann-Kool — komisja PETI: Gaya
    [Show full text]
  • Page 01 Sept 08.Indd
    ISO 9001:2008 CERTIFIED NEWSPAPER Home | 3 Business | 17 Sport | 27 Doha Exhibition Oil ministers Barcelona, and Convention to meet in Sydney Centre to open Doha amid University in in November. price slide. semi-finals. TUESDAY 8 SEPTEMBER 2015 • 24 Dhul-Qa’da 1436 • Volume 20 Number 6547 www.thepeninsulaqatar.com [email protected] | [email protected] Editorial: 4455 7741 | Advertising: 4455 7837 / 4455 7780 Emir receives Lebanese politician No change in Qatar sends stance on Syria, says Moscow MOSCOW: The Russian Foreign Ministry yesterday denounced as 1,000 troops “falsifications and fabrications” media reports it was changing its stance on the war in Syria or on the future of President Bashar Al Assad, whom it has shielded throughout the conflict. to Yemen “We don’t appoint or dismiss foreign presidents, neither on our own or in cahoots with anyone Fresh offensive to retake Sana’a else,” the ministry said in a state- ment. Ministry representatives SANA’A: Qatar has sent 1,000 Saudis and Emiratis. also declined immediate comment ground troops to Yemen, Al Saudi Warplanes renewed on a US request to Athens to close Jazeera television said, ahead strikes on Houthi targets across Greek airspace for Russian supply of a planned offensive against Yemen and Houthi-run media said flights to Syria. Iranian-backed Houthis holding the raids killed at least 12 people, Nor have Russian officials con- the capital Sana’a. including women and children, in firmed recent media reports of Qatari pilots had already the central province of Ibb. Moscow increasing its military joined months of Saudi-led air Al Jazeera’s English website assistance to Assad, saying only that strikes on the Houthi militia, said 1,000 Qatari soldiers, backed it has long been supplying Damascus which seized Sana’a a year ago by 200 armoured vehicles and with arms and training to help it and then advanced across much 30 US-made Apache helicopters fight Islamist radicals, and will of the country, forcing President had been deployed.
    [Show full text]
  • 4. Mission Confiée À Un Député 5. Souhaits De Bienvenue 6
    C 27 E/2 Journal officiel de l'Union européenne FR 31.1.2008 Mercredi, 28 mars 2007 4. Mission confiée à un député M. le Président communique que le Premier ministre de la République tchèque l'a informé de la décision qu'il a prise de nommer Jan Zahradil pour le représenter lors des consultations relatives à la «Déclaration de Berlin» et, plus généralement, dans la relance du processus constitutionnel au cours de la présidence alle- mande de l'Union. La commission juridique, saisie conformément à l'article 4, paragraphe 5 du règlement, est arrivée, lors de sa réunion des 19 et 20 mars 2007, à la conclusion que cette mission est conforme à la lettre et à l'esprit de l'Acte portant élection des représentants au Parlement européen au suffrage universel direct et que, par conséquent, Jan Zahradil ne se trouve pas en situation d'incompatibilité et peut continuer à exercer son mandat parlementaire. 5. Souhaits de bienvenue M. le Président souhaite, au nom du Parlement, la bienvenue à une délégation du parlement irakien, conduite par Hamid Mousa, qui a pris place dans la tribune officielle. 6. Composition des commissions et des délégations Le Président a reçu des groupes PPE-DE, PSE, ALDE et des membres non-inscrits les demandes de nomina- tion suivantes: — commission AFET: Ria Oomen-Ruijten — commission INTA: Corien Wortmann-Kool à la place de Albert Jan Maat — commission CONT: Ruth Hieronymi à la place de Vito Bonsignore — commission REGI: Wolfgang Bulfon à la place de Giulietto Chiesa — commission PECH: Joop Post à la place de Albert Jan Maat
    [Show full text]
  • European Parliament
    EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT 2004 2009 Session document 11.5.2005 B6-0295/2005 } B6-0296/2005 } B6-0297/2005 } B6-0298/2005 } B6-0299/2005 } B6-0306/2005 } RC1 JOINT MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION pursuant to Rule 103(4) of the Rules of Procedure, by – Armin Laschet and Albert Jan Maat, on behalf of the PPE-DE Group – Jan Marinus Wiersma and Bernadette Bourzai, on behalf of the PSE Group – Ona Juknevičienė and Dirk Sterckx, on behalf of the ALDE Group – Bart Staes and Cem Özdemir, on behalf of the Verts/ALE Group – Vittorio Emanuele Agnoletto, on behalf of the GUE/NGL Group – Cristiana Muscardini and Anna Elzbieta Fotyga, on behalf of the UEN Group replacing the motions by the following groups: – GUE/NGL (B6-0295/2005) – Verts/ALE (B6-0296/2005) – ALDE (B6-0297/2005) – UEN (B6-0298/2005) – PSE (B6-0299/2005) – PPE-DE (B6-0306/2005) on the situation in Kyrgyzstan and Central Asia RC\566815EN.doc PE 357.374v01-00} PE 357.375v01-00} PE 357.376v01-00} PE 357.377v01-00} PE 357.378v01-00} PE 357.385v01-00} RC1 EN EN European Parliament resolution on the situation in Kyrgyzstan and Central Asia The European Parliament, – having regard to its previous resolutions on Kyrgyzstan and the Central Asian Republics, – having regard to the Partnership and Cooperation Agreements with Kyrgyzstan, Kazakhstan and Uzbekistan, which have already entered into force, – having regard to the Partnership and Cooperation Agreements with Tajikistan and Turkmenistan, which have been signed but not yet ratified, – having regard to the Commission’s Strategy Paper on Central
    [Show full text]
  • Universiteit Gent
    UNIVERSITEIT GENT FACULTEIT POLITIEKE EN SOCIALE WETENSCHAPPEN De invloed van regeringsdeelname op het stemgedrag van Europarlementsleden: een wetenschappelijke verhandeling over Belgische en Nederlandse Europarlementsleden. Wetenschappelijke verhandeling aantal woorden: 23.170 Wouter Borremans MASTERPROEF EU-STUDIES PROMOTOR: PROF. DR. Hendrik Vos COMMISSARIS: (PROF.) DR. (NAAM) COMMISSARIS: (PROF.) DR. (NAAM) ACADEMIEJAAR 2009 - 2010 1 1. INLEIDING 2. THEORETISCH KADER 2.1. VERTEGENWOORDIGING EN HET PRINCIPAL-AGENT MODEL 2.2. HET PRINCIPAL-AGENT MODEL TOEGEPAST 2.2.1. Doelen van Europarlementsleden en de macht van beide principals 2.2.2. Voorgaand onderzoek 3. ONDERZOEKSVRAAG EN TOELICHTING VAN HET ONDERZOEK 3.1. ONDERZOEKSVRAAG 3.1.1. Belgische Europarlementsleden (2004-2009) en de Vlaamse en federale regering 3.1.2. Samenwerkingsakkoord tussen de federale staat en de regio’s in België 3.1.3. Nederlandse Europarlementsleden (2004-2009) en de Nederlandse regering 3.1.4. Het votewatch-project en de analyse van roll-call votes 3.1.5. Een selectie van beleidsdomeinen 4. ONDERZOEK NAAR DE INVLOED VAN REGERINGSDEELNAME VAN EEN PARTIJ OP HET STEMGEDRAG VAN HAAR EUROPARLEMENTSLEDEN 4.1. DE VLAAMSE REGERING 4.1.1. Landbouw 4.1.2. Cultuur en Onderwijs 4.1.3. Leefmilieu en Volksgezondheid 4.1.4. Visserij 4.1.5. Economie 4.1.6. Werkgelegenheid en Sociale zaken 4.1.7. Transport en Toerisme 4.1.8. Conclusies Vlaamse Regering 4.2. DE FEDERALE REGERING 4.2.1. Vrijheden, Justitie en Binnenlandse zaken 4.2.2. Ontwikkeling 4.2.3. Buitenlandse zaken en Veiligheid 4.2.4. Interne Markt en Consumentenbescherming 4.2.5. Economie 4.2.6. Werkgelegenheid en Sociale zaken 4.2.7.
    [Show full text]
  • 14. Debate on Cases of Breaches of Human Rights, Democracy and the Rule of Law (Debate)
    9.12.2006 EN Official Journal of the European Union C 300 E/281 Thursday 15 June 2006 Vladimír Špidla (Member of the Commission) answered the oral questions. The following spoke: Iles Braghetto, on behalf of the PPE-DE Group, Katerina Batzeli, on behalf of the PSE Group, Jean Marie Beaupuy, on behalf of the ALDE Group, Thomas Wise, on behalf of the IND/DEM Group, Charles Tannock, on Thomas Wise's remarks, Inés Ayala Sender (standing in for Rosa Miguélez Ramos), Anne Laperrouze, Christa Klaß, Ari Vatanen (standing in for Joseph Daul, Chairman of the AGRI Commit- tee), Astrid Lulling, Werner Langen, Albert Jan Maat, Vladimír Špidla, Astrid Lulling and Inés Ayala Sender, the latter two to put questions to the Commission, which Vladimír Špidla answered. The debate closed. 14. Debate on cases of breaches of human rights, democracy and the rule of law (debate) (For the titles and authors of the motions for resolutions, see Minutes of 13.06.2006, Item 5) 14.1. East Timor Motions for resolution B6-0337/2006, B6-0359/2006, B6-0362/2006, B6-0364/2006 and B6-0367/2006 Raül Romeva i Rueda, Pedro Guerreiro, Anneli Jäätteenmäki, John Bowis, Ana Maria Gomes and Marcin Libicki introduced motions for resolutions. The following spoke: Charles Tannock, on behalf of the PPE-DE Group, John Attard-Montalto, on behalf of the PSE Group, Alyn Smith, on behalf of the Verts/ALE Group, Kathy Sinnott, on behalf of the IND/DEM Group, and Vladimír Špidla (Member of the Commission). The debate closed. Vote: Minutes of 15.06.2006, Item 18.1.
    [Show full text]
  • 5. Teksty Porozumień Przekazane Przez Radę 6. Porządek
    23.2.2006 PL Dziennik Urzędowy Unii Europejskiej C 45 E/5 Środa 27 kwiecień 2005 — Bart Staes, w imieniu komisji CONT, do Komisji: Współpraca w ramach władzy budżetowej przy podziale i możliwości wykorzystania płatności pieniężnych, dokonanych w wyniku poro- zumienia między Komisją,Państwami Członkowskimi i Philip Morris w sprawie zwalczania oszustw (B6-0232/2005); — Jo Leinen, w imieniu komisji AFCO, do Komisji: Aspekty instytucjonalne Europejskiej Służby Działań Zewnętrznych (B6-0233/2005); — Karl-Heinz Florenz, w imieniu komisji ENVI, do Rady: Strategia Rady na Seminarium Eksper- tów Rządowych w sprawie zmian klimatu (B6-0234/2005); — Karl-Heinz Florenz, w imieniu komisji ENVI, do Komisji: Strategia Komisji na Seminarium Ekspertów Rządowych w sprawie zmian klimatu (B6-0235/2005). 3.2) projekty rezolucji (art. 113 Regulaminu) — Garriga Polledo Salvador — Projekt rezolucji w sprawie realizacji umowy odnośnie inwestowa- nia 3 % PKB w badania i rozwój (R&D) (B6-0271/2005). odesłany komisja przedm. właśc. ITRE opinia BUDG, ECON 3.3) pisemne oświadczenia celem wpisania ich do rejestru (art. 116 Regulaminu) — Albert Jan Maat, Camiel Eurlings, Niels Busk, Edith Mastenbroek i Struan Stevenson, w sprawie wyboru jednej siedziby dla Parlamentu Europejskiego (21/2005) 5. Teksty porozumień przekazane przez Radę Rada przekazałapoświadczoną kopię następującego dokumentu: — Umowa między Wspólnotą Europejską arządem Socjalistycznej Republiki Wietnamu w sprawie dostępu do rynku. 6. Porządek dzienny Porządek dzienny został ustalony (punkt 13 Protokołu z 11_04.2005) i rozesłana została errata do porządku dziennego (PE 356.376/OJ/COR), do którego zaproponowano następującą zmianę: środa — wniosek do komisji DEVE o przełożenie na późniejszą sesję miesięczną sprawozdania w sprawie pro- jektu rozporządzenia Parlamentu Europejskiego i Rady ustanawiającego instrument finansowania współ- pracy na rzecz rozwoju i współpracy gospodarczej [COM(2004)0629 — C6-0128/2004 — 2004/0220 (COD)] Sprawozdawca: Gay Mitchell (A6-0060/2005).
    [Show full text]
  • 13. a Bolgár Köztársaság Európai Unióhoz Való Csatlakozás Iránti
    C 33 E/34 Az Európai Unió Hivatalos Lapja HU 2006.9.2. 2005. április 12., kedd — 11. módosítás mellette: Margrietus van den Berg, Daniel Caspary, Philip Claeys, Koenraad Dillen, Eluned Morgan és Frank Vanhecke tartózkodás: Alexander Radwan — állásfoglalás (egészében) mellette: Fausto Bertinotti és Roberto Musacchio Alexander Stubb-jelentés – A6-0066/2005 — 1. módosítás ellene: Pervenche Berès és Anders Wijkman Glenys Kinnock-jelentés – A6-0075/2005 — 7. módosítás ellene: Linda McAvan — 11. módosítás mellette: Françoise Grossetête ellene: Anders Wijkman — 12. módosítás ellene: Marianne Thyssen — 14. módosítás ellene: Marie Panayotopoulos-Cassiotou — 15. módosítás ellene: Marie Panayotopoulos-Cassiotou tartózkodás: Geoffrey Van Orden — 16. módosítás ellene: Marie Panayotopoulos-Cassiotou — állásfoglalás (egészében) mellette: Robert Goebbels (A 13.05-kor megszakított ülést 15 órakor folytatják.) ELNÖKSÉG: Josep BORRELL FONTELLES Elnök 12. Az előző ülés jegyzőkönyvének elfogadása Pervenche Berès közli, hogy jelen volt, a neve ennek ellenére nem szerepel a jelenléti íven. * ** Az előző ülés jegyzőkönyvét elfogadták. 13. A Bolgár Köztársaság Európai Unióhoz való csatlakozás iránti kérelme *** – A Bolgár Köztársaság kérelme az európai uniós tagság iránt – Románia Euró- pai Unióhoz való csatlakozás iránti kérelme *** – A Román Köztársaság kérelme az európai uniós tagság iránt – Románia és Bulgária csatlakozásának pénzügyi hatásai (vita) Ajánlás Bulgária Európai Unióhoz való csatlakozás iránti kérelméről [AA1/2/2005 — C6-0085/2005 — 2005/0901(AVC)] – Külügyi Bizottság. Előadó: Geoffrey Van Orden (A6-0082/2005). Jelentés a Bolgár Köztársaság Európai Unióhoz való csatlakozás iránti kérelméről [2005/2029(INI)] – Külügyi Bizottság. Előadó: Geoffrey Van Orden (A6-0078/2005). 2006.9.2. HU Az Európai Unió Hivatalos Lapja C 33 E/35 2005. április 12., kedd Ajánlás Románia Európai Unióhoz való csatlakozás iránti kérelméről [AA1/2/2005 — C6-0086/2005 — 2005/0902(AVC)] – Külügyi Bizottság.
    [Show full text]
  • Europees Parlement
    EUROPEES PARLEMENT GGG G G G G 1999 G G 2004 G G G Zittingsdocument DEFINITIEVE VERSIE A5-0197/2004 18 maart 2004 * VERSLAG over het voorstel voor een verordening van de Raad inzake de bescherming van dieren tijdens het vervoer en daarmee samenhangende activiteiten en tot wijziging van de richtlijnen 64/432/EEG en 93/119/EG (COM(2003) 425 – C5-0438/2003 – 2003/0171(CNS)) Commissie landbouw en plattelandsontwikkeling Rapporteur: Albert Jan Maat RR\529454NL.rtf PE 329.843 NL NL PR_CNS_am Verklaring van de gebruikte tekens * Raadplegingsprocedure Meerderheid van de uitgebrachte stemmen **I Samenwerkingsprocedure (eerste lezing) Meerderheid van de uitgebrachte stemmen **II Samenwerkingsprocedure (tweede lezing) Meerderheid van de uitgebrachte stemmen voor de goedkeuring van het gemeenschappelijk standpunt Meerderheid van de leden van het Parlement voor de verwerping of amendering van het gemeenschappelijk standpunt *** Instemming Meerderheid van de leden van het Parlement, behalve in de in de artikelen 105, 107, 161 en 300 van het EG-Verdrag en in artikel 7 van het EU-Verdrag bedoelde gevallen ***I Medebeslissingsprocedure (eerste lezing) Meerderheid van de uitgebrachte stemmen ***II Medebeslissingsprocedure (tweede lezing) Meerderheid van de uitgebrachte stemmen voor de goedkeuring van het gemeenschappelijk standpunt Meerderheid van de leden van het Parlement voor de verwerping of amendering van het gemeenschappelijk standpunt ***III Medebeslissingsprocedure (derde lezing) Meerderheid van de uitgebrachte stemmen voor de goedkeuring van de gemeenschappelijke ontwerptekst (De aangeduide procedure is gebaseerd op de door de Commissie voorgestelde rechtsgrondslag.) Amendementen op wetsteksten Door het Parlement aangebrachte wijzigingen worden in vet cursief aangegeven. De markering in mager cursief is een aanwijzing voor de technische diensten en betreft passages in de wetstekst waarvoor een correctie wordt voorgesteld (bijvoorbeeld aperte fouten of weglatingen in een taalversie).
    [Show full text]
  • European Parliament
    EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT ««« « « « « 1999 « « 2004 ««« Session document FINAL A5-0211/2000 18 July 2000 REPORT on the Council's 1999 Annual Report on the Implementation of the EU Code of Conduct on Arms Exports (11384/1999 – C5-0021/2000 – 2000/2012(COS)) Committee on Foreign Affairs, Human Rights, Common Security and Defence Policy Rapporteur: Gary Titley RR\418443EN.doc PE 285.626 EN EN PE 285.626 2/25 RR\418443EN.doc EN CONTENTS Page PROCEDURAL PAGE ..............................................................................................................4 MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION .............................................................................................5 EXPLANATORY STATEMENT............................................................................................12 OPINION OF THE COMMITTEE ON INDUSTRY, EXTERNAL TRADE, RESEARCH AND ENERGY ....................................................................................................................... 21 RR\418443EN.doc 3/25 PE 285.626 EN PROCEDURAL PAGE By letter of 8 November 1999, the Council forwarded to Parliament its 1999 Annual Report on the Implementation of the EU Code of Conduct on Arms Exports (11384/1999 – 2000/2012(COS)). At the sitting of 21 January 2000 the President of Parliament announced that she had referred this report to the Committee on Foreign Affairs, Human Rights, Common Security and Defence Policy as the committee responsible and the Committee on Industry, External Trade, Research and Energy for its opinion (C5-0021/2000). The Committee
    [Show full text]
  • Farmers for a Better Future
    Farmers for a Better Future The Definite Breakthrough of the Agriterra Approach Preface by Bert Koenders: The farmer comes first 3 Contents Mission Statement 4 Make the best of your opportunities 5 Agriterra 2004-2006 at a glance 6 Rural tourism, a new branch of sports 8 Rural tourism in Kenya. Your cup of tea? 10 Working together to create support 12 Agriterra in the field 12 Debating on genes 13 Embryos for Kyrgyzstan 14 Solidarity 15 The weakest link 16 Chain approach 16 India: Mango mania 17 Business Initiatives 18 Milk production and Dairy Processing in Tanzania 18 Nepal: Insurance for success 20 Niger: Patience is a virtue 21 Rwanda: Cattle improvement 22 From bargaining to negotiating 23 Agriterra in the Mekong region 24 Everything you ever wanted to know about exchanges 27 Cooperation with added value 28 How Haitians give the Congolese a lesson 29 The Experience of an AgriPooler. Henk de Lange and Moldavia 30 Agriterra and gender issues 32 The interests of rural women 32 About guarantees and biscuits in Costa Rica 34 Philippines: The voice of women must be heard 36 Mapping & Profiling 38 Burundi 38 Knowing why we do what we do 40 HIV/Aids Conference. KENFAP takes central role in fighting Aids in Kenya 41 Youth: You are a farmer, young and you want something 42 The importance of defending interests in Africa 45 North-South 46 Spuds in Congo 46 FinBase: From bills to book-keeping 49 Thailand: Combine marketing and entrepreneurship 51 FETRAF stands up for family farming in Brazil 52 Farmers Fighting Poverty: A resounding conference 53 Agriterra, powered by ICCO & Cordaid 54 From digital gap to digital opportunities 54 To devote yourself unselfishly is of inestimable value 56 Preview: Further towards the base 58 Good - Better - ISO 59 Thanks for the collaboration and colophon 59 2 Preface The farmer comes first “The world has never been richer, yet at the same time, the distribution of wealth has seldom been less equal.
    [Show full text]
  • Agri/8/04705 2013/0141(Cod) Com(2013)0267 - C7-0122/2013
    European Parliament 2014-2019 Committee on Agriculture and Rural Development AGRI_PV(2016)0425_1 MINUTES Meeting of 25 April 2016, 15.00-18.30, and 26 April 2016, 09.00-12.30 and 15.00-18.30 BRUSSELS The meeting opened at 15.00 on Monday, 25 April 2016, with Czesław Adam Siekierski (Chair) presiding. 25 April 2016, 15.00 – 18.30 With the Council and Commission 1. Adoption of agenda AGRI_OJ (2016)0425_1 The agenda was adopted. 2. Chair's announcements 3. Hearing on "European level playing field: Implementation of European legislation in the agricultural sector" (see separate programme) Speakers: Czesław Adam Siekierski, Eric Andrieu, Niels Lindberg Madsen (expert), Antal Szabadkai (expert), Albert Jan Maat (expert), Robert Hoste (expert), Philippe Loiseau, Jan Huitema, Albert Deß, Paolo De Castro, Marijana Petir, Annie Schreijer- Pierik, Martin Häusling, Edouard Ferrand, Norbert Erdős, Tassos Haniotis (DG AGRI) 4. Exchange of views with the European Commission (DG AGRI) on delegated and implementing acts regarding the agricultural crises Speakers: Czesław Adam Siekierski, Eric Andrieu, Joost Korte (DG AGRI), Michel Dantin, Ulrike Müller, Martin Häusling, Philippe Loiseau, José Bové, Maria Heubuch, Annie Schreijer-Pierik, Albert Deß, Clara Eugenia Aguilera García, Edouard Ferrand, Luke Ming Flanagan, Paolo De Castro, Peter Jahr, Jordi Sebastià, Franc Bogovič, John Stuart Agnew, Mairead McGuinness PV\1092475EN.doc PE580.782v01-00 EN United in diversity EN 26 April 2016, 9.00 – 12.30 *** Electronic vote *** 4a. Protective measures against pests of plants AGRI/8/04705 2013/0141(COD) COM(2013)0267 - C7-0122/2013 Rapporteur: Anthea McIntyre Vote on the text agreed during interinstitutional negotiations Speakers: Czesław Adam Siekierski, Albert Deß, Anthea McIntyre The text, as amended, was adopted: for: 35; against: 4; abstentions: 4.
    [Show full text]