Stratigraphic Test Well, Nantucket Island, Massachusetts Stratigraphic Test Well, Nantucket Island, Massachusetts

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Stratigraphic Test Well, Nantucket Island, Massachusetts Stratigraphic Test Well, Nantucket Island, Massachusetts GEOLOGICAL SURVEY CIRCULAR 773 Stratigraphic Test Well, Nantucket Island, Massachusetts Stratigraphic Test Well, Nantucket Island, Massachusetts By D. W. Folger, J. C. Hathaway, R. A. Christopher, P. C. Valentine, and C. W. Poag GEOLOGICAL SURVEY CIRCULAR 773 Description of Triassic(?) basalt and Upper Cretaceous to Pleistocene sediments recovered from 514 meters of test coring 1978 United States Department off the Interior CECIL D. ANDRUS, Secretary Geological Survey W. A. Radlinski, Acting Director Library of Congress catalog-card No. 78-600008 Free on application to Branch of Distribution, U.S. Geological Survey 1200 South Eads Street, Arlington, Ma. 22202 CONTENTS Page Page Abstract ___________. 1 Results Continued. Introduction _____________. 1 Stratigraphy Continued Purpose ________-__. 1 Paleontology Continued Setting ____________. 2 Pliocene or Miocene 15 Previous work ___________ 3 Eocene ______ . 16 Acknowledgments ___________. 4 Paleocene _______ . 16 Methods ______________. 5 Borehole 6001 ______. 16 Results ___________________ 6 Pleistocene ________ 16 Stratigraphy ____________ 6 Eocene __ ______ 17 General lithology ______ 6 Upper Cretaceous _. 17 Upper zone ________ 6 Porosity and permeability _. 18 Middle zone ______ 7 Discussion _________ ___ _ ___. 18 Lower zone ____ 8 Regional stratigraphy ______ . 18 Saprolite and basalt 8 Regional structure _____________ 22 Paleontology _________ 15 Hydrology . 23 Coskata well _____ 15 Summary ______ ___ . 26 Pleistocene ___. 15 References cited ____ _ ________ 26 ILLUSTRATIONS Page FIGURE 1. Index map of Nantucket Island and the surrounding area _ 2 2. Cross section showing structure of part of Continental Shelf south and west of Nantucket ____ _- 4 3. Columnar section of borehole 6001 ___ ___ - 6 4-6. Diagrams showing variations for the following chemical compo­ nents in the basalt and saprolite zones of borehole 6001: 4. Chemical elements and minerals __________ __ _____ 14 5. TiC-2 and P205 _________________ 15 6. Mn02 and CaO ____________________________ 15 7. Stratigraphic sections showing regional correlation of Nantucket boreholes with other holes drilled in the Atlantic Coastal Plain to the west and south _______________ ____ 19 8. Section from New Jersey to Georges Bank showing environment of deposition of sediments _____________________________ 21 9. Map showing gravity anomalies in Nantucket region ___ _ 23 10. Seismic reflection profile through Great Round Shoal Channel and Nantucket Sound ________________________________ 24 11. Graph comparing salinity of interstitial water with electrical conductivity and lithology in borehole 6001 ___________ 25 TABLES Page TABLE 1. Partial chemical and X-ray modal analyses of volcanic rock and saprolite ________________________ _ _ 9 2. Porosity and permeability analyses ___________ _____________ 18 III Stratigraphic Test Well, Nantucket Island, Massachusetts By D. W. Folger, J. C. Hathaway, R. A. Christopher, P. C. Valentine, and C. W. Poag ABSTRACT local generation of petroleum hydrocarbons in this shoreward area of the continental margin is unlikely. The U.S. Geological Survey, in cooperation with the Freshwater or low-salinity brackish water was Massachusetts Water Resources Commission and the found in sediments far below the depth predicted by Nantucket Conservation Foundation, continuously cored the Ghyben-Herzberg principle. These interstitial 514 m of sediment and volcanic rock in a Stratigraphic waters are probably relict ground water emplaced and water-quality test. during times of low sea level during the Pleistocene. Stratified sediments were divided texturally into three zones: the upper zone (0-128 m) contains mostly coarse sand and gravel; the middle zone (128-349 m) INTRODUCTION contains mostly silty clay and a few beds of sand and silt; and the lower zone (349-457 m) contains soft, PURPOSE unconsolidated, clayey sand. Below the lower zone, a In 1975, the U.S. Geological Survey (USGS), saprolite, composed mostly of clay, grades abruptly downward at 470 m into partially altered basalt that in cooperation with the Massachusetts Water extends to the bottom of the hole at 514 m. Resources Commission, planned to drill a 122-m Fossils are sparse throughout the cores, but Pleisto­ hole near the geographic center of Nantucket cene, Eocene, and Upper Cretaceous assemblages were Island to assess the total thickness of fresh­ identified. On the basis of limited foraminifer and water in the sediments. Calculations based on ostracode assemblages, Pleistocene deposits are in­ the Ghyben-Herzberg principle predicted a zone ferred to extend to a depth of about 85 m. A Lower Eocene section 25 m thick is defined on the basis of of freshwater 120-150 m thick (Kohout and palynomorph and dinoflagellate assemblages. (How­ others, 1977). This principle is the theory of ever, samples from a water well drilled in 1933, 10 hydrostatic equilibrium between freshwater km to the north, contain Pliocene and Miocene, early and more dense seawater in a coastal aquifer; Eocene, and Pal eocene foraminifers.) Upper Cretaceous it states that for each meter of ground-water beds, inferred to extend from 128 to 349 m, are iden­ tified mostly on the basis of pollen and spores. The elevation above sea level, the freshwater lens oldest datable fossiliferous sample at 345 m is early- will depress the saltwater interface about 40 m to-middle Cenomanian in age. below sea level. The USGS later proposed to Samples found below 345 m are barren of indigenous deepen the test to about 500 m, the approximate fossils and are assigned an Albian Age on the basis depth of a prominent acoustic reflector (Oldale, of electric log correlations. Paleontologic evidence sug­ gests that the Pleistocene section was deposited under 1969), which was assumed to be basement. The nearshore marine conditions, the Tertiary section un­ primary objective of the additional drilling was der open-shelf marine conditions, and most of the to obtain new Stratigraphic information near Upper Cretaceous section under nonmarine conditions. the shoreward margin of the Georges Bank The unstratified clay that makes up the saprolite basin. Seismic reflection and refraction surveys was probably formed by subaerial weathering of basalt similar to that which underlies the saprolite. Chemical by oil companies and by the USGS have been evidence suggests that the basalt was probably de­ carried out for several years in the region of posited as a series of flows. The oldest K-Ar date ob­ Georges Bank, where leasing of tracts and ex­ tained in the basalt was 183±8 m.y. (Early Jurassic); ploratory drilling are imminent. however, because of alteration, this probably repre­ The nearest pre-Pleistocene sedimentary sents a minimum age. strata exposed on land are Tertiary and Cre­ Lignites and coal in the Upper Cretaceous section are of low rank and, on the basis of their thermal im­ taceous clay and sand that crop out at Gay maturity, have probably never been buried deeply; thus, Head, Martha's Vineyard (fig. 1). However, MASSACHUSETTS BAY 4I°25'- NANTUCKET SOUND Great Point COSKATA BOREHOLE ( T.D. 102m) Sankaty Head 41° 15'- USGS BOREHOLE NO. 6001 (T.D. 514m) 70°00' USGS BOREHOLE NO. 6016 USGS BOREHOLE NO. 6018 © and COST G1 STRATIGRAPHIC TEST 0 10 70° 00 FIGURE 1. Index map of Nantucket Island and surrounding area showing location of Nantucket stratigraphic test well (USGS borehole No. 6001) and other boreholes in the region. T.D. shows total depth of some of the boreholes. they are dislocated and highly folded and the coast of Cape Cod, Mass., on the eastern faulted, apparently from loading or "bulldoz­ Continental Shelf of the United States. It has ing" by glacial ice (Kaye, 1964), and they do a maximum elevation of only 33 m (Folger not provide a clear picture of the stratigraphy. Hill), and encompasses a total area of 132 km2. The Nantucket test-well site is located farther Exposed surficial sediments are mostly gla­ seaward from Martha's Vineyard, and it pro­ cial sand, gravel, and some clay (Richards, vided an opportunity to gain data where sedi­ 1962; Woodworth, 1934). These deposits are ments are thicker, closer to the basin center, part of the Ronkonkoma-Vineyard-Nantucket and presumably less affected by ice movements. moraine and its outwash plain that extends Furthermore, penetrating the sedimentary sec­ eastward to form part of Georges Bank (Pratt tion and identifying basement would be useful and Schlee, 1969). Controversy has surrounded in the interpretation of geophysical data col­ the age of shelly deposits underlying the sand lected to assess the resource potential of the and gravel at Sankaty Head (fig. 1), but most area. evidence available suggests that they are also of Pleistocene age (Richards, 1962; Gustavson, SETTING 1976). Nantucket Island is about 25 km long, as The well site (borehole 6001) is at lat much as 10 km wide, and lies 40 km south of 41°15/54.9// N. and long 70°02'16.72" W. near the geographic center of the island on land School student, and examined for microfossil owned by the Nantucket Conservation Founda­ content with the help of J. A. Cushman. On the tion, which, because of its interest in island basis of Foraminifera that he discovered in the water resource evaluation, kindly granted the fine-textured sediments, he assigned them a USGS permission to drill. The site was con­ Tertiary age. This work, remarkable for a high veniently located 60 m from Milestone Road, the school student, remained unpublished until now. main highway between Nantucket and Sias- The Coskata samples, which had been saved by conset (fig. 1), in a long linear depression Mr. Barrett, provided for us a Tertiary section known as Madequecham Valley that was prob­ that is mostly absent in the USGS borehole. ably eroded by a proglacial melt-water stream. Geophysical investgiations of the island to Ground surface elevation at the site is 10.9 m our knowledge have been sparse. Weston Geo­ above mean sea level. physical Co.
Recommended publications
  • Martha's Vineyard Statistical Profile February 2019
    Martha’s Vineyard Statistical Profile February 2019 www.mvcommission.org PO Box 1447, 33 New York Ave, Oak Bluffs, MA 02557 [email protected] p-508-693-3453; f-508-693-7894 Health and Education 41 County health rankings: County, 2018 41 Health trends: County (various time ranges) 42 Number of arrests per town, 2007–2017 43 Arrest rate by town, 2016 43 Lyme disease cases: County comparison, 2000–2015 43 Lyme disease rates: County comparison, 2015 43 Opioid overdose deaths: County comparison, 2000–2016 44 Opioid overdose death rate: County comparison, 2016 44 Homelessness: County, 2015–2018 45 Martha’s Vineyard Center for Living and Serving Hands food distribution: County, 2013–2017 45 SNAP participation by town (percent of population), 2010–2016 45 Martha’s Vineyard Community Services: Services provided in 2017 46 Martha’s Vineyard Hospital inpatient discharges and emergency visits, 2010–2018 46 Martha’s Vineyard Hospital’s 2016 Community Health Assessment and Implementation Strategy (selected tables and charts) 47 Educational attainment by town, 2016 49 Adult education enrollment: Island 2009–2018 50 School enrollment by Island school, 2007–2017 50 Enrollment by gender (percent of school), 2017–2018 51 Selected populations (percent of school), 2017–2018 51 Plans of high school graduates (percent of students), 2016–2017 51 HEALTH AND EDUCATION The County Health Rankings, a collaboration between the Robert Wood Johnson Foundation and the University of Wisconsin Population Health Institute, measures vital health factors in counties across the United States. The program helps communi- ties understand what factors influence their overall quality and length of life, as outlined in the chart below.
    [Show full text]
  • Rapid Formation and Degradation of Barrier Spits in Areas with Low Rates of Littoral Drift*
    Marine Geology, 49 (1982) 257-278 257 Elsevier Scientific Publishing Company, Amsterdam- Printed in The Netherlands RAPID FORMATION AND DEGRADATION OF BARRIER SPITS IN AREAS WITH LOW RATES OF LITTORAL DRIFT* D.G. AUBREY and A.G. GAINES, Jr. Woods Hole Oceanographic Institution, Woods Hole, MA 02543 (U.S.A.) (Received February 8, 1982; revised and accepted April 6, 1982) ABSTRACT Aubrey, D.G. and Gaines Jr., A.G., 1982. Rapid formation and degradation of barrier spits in areas with low rates of littoral drift. Mar. Geol., 49: 257-278. A small barrier beach exposed to low-energy waves and a small tidal range (0.7 m) along Nantucket Sound, Mass., has experienced a remarkable growth phase followed by rapid attrition during the past century. In a region of low longshore-transport rates, the barrier spit elongated approximately 1.5 km from 1844 to 1954, developing beyond the baymouth, parallel to the adjacent Nantucket Sound coast. Degradation of the barrier spit was initiated by a succession of hurricanes in 1954 (Carol, Edna and Hazel). A breach opened and stabilized near the bay end of the one kilometer long inlet channel, providing direct access for exchange of baywater with Nantucket Sound, and separating the barrier beach into two nearly equal limbs. The disconnected northeast limb migrated shorewards, beginning near the 1954 inlet and progressing northeastward, filling the relict inlet channel behind it. At present, about ten percent of the northeast limb is subaerial: the rest of the limb has completely filled the former channel and disappeared. The southwest limb of the barrier beach has migrated shoreward, but otherwise has not changed significantly since the breach.
    [Show full text]
  • Cuttyhunk-Nantucket 24-Quadrangle Area of Cape Cod and Islands, Southeast Massachusetts
    Prepared in cooperation with the Commonwealth of Massachusetts Office of the State Geologist and Executive Office of Energy and Environmental Affairs Surficial Geologic Map of the Pocasset-Provincetown- Cuttyhunk-Nantucket 24-Quadrangle Area of Cape Cod and Islands, Southeast Massachusetts Compiled by Byron D. Stone and Mary L. DiGiacomo-Cohen Open-File Report 2006-1260-E U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey U.S. Department of the Interior KEN SALAZAR, Secretary U.S. Geological Survey Marcia K. McNutt, Director U.S. Geological Survey, Reston, Virginia: 2009 For product and ordering information: World Wide Web: http://www.usgs.gov/pubprod Telephone: 1-888-ASK-USGS For more information on the USGS—the Federal source for science about the Earth, its natural and living resources, natural hazards, and the environment: World Wide Web: http://www.usgs.gov Telephone: 1-888-ASK-USGS Suggested citation: Stone, B.D., and DiGiacomo-Cohen, M.L., comps., 2009, Surficial geologic map of the Pocasset­ Provincetown-Cuttyhunk-Nantucket 24-quadrangle area of Cape Cod and Islands, southeast Massachusetts: U.S. Geological Survey Open-File Report 2006-1260-E. Any use of trade, product, or firm names is for descriptive purposes only and does not imply endorsement by the U.S. Government. Although this report is in the public domain, permission must be secured from the individual copyright owners to reproduce any copyrighted materials contained within this report. Cover figure. Photograph of eroding cliffs at Gay Head on Martha’s Vineyard (source:
    [Show full text]
  • DCR's Beaver Brook Reservation
    Massachusetts Department of Conservation and Recreation Bureau of Planning and Resource Protection Resource Management Planning Program RESOURCE MANAGEMENT PLAN DCR’s Beaver Brook Reservation Historic Beaver Brook Reservation and Beaver Brook North Reservation Belmont, Lexington and Waltham, Massachusetts March 2010 DCR’s Beaver Brook Reservation Historic Beaver Brook Reservation and Beaver Brook North Reservation Belmont, Lexington and Waltham, Massachusetts RESOURCE MANAGEMENT PLAN 2010 Deval L. Patrick, Governor Timothy P. Murray, Lt. Governor Ian A. Bowles, Secretary Richard K. Sullivan, Jr., Commissioner Jack Murray, Deputy Commissioner for Parks Operations The Massachusetts Department of Conservation and Recreation (DCR), an agency of the Executive Office of Energy and Environmental Affairs, oversees 450,000 acres of parks and forests, beaches, bike trails, watersheds, dams, and parkways. Led by Commissioner Richard K. Sullivan Jr., the agency’s mission is to protect, promote, and enhance our common wealth of natural, cultural, and recreational resources. To learn more about DCR, our facilities, and our programs, please visit www.mass.gov/dcr. Contact us at [email protected]. Printed on Recycled Paper RESOURCE MANAGEMENT PLAN Expanded Beaver Brook Reservation Belmont, Lexington and Waltham, Massachusetts Contents Executive Summary 1 Introduction 1 Planning Process 2 Distinctive Characteristics of the Expanded Reservation 2 Priority Findings 3 Recommendations 5 Capital Improvements 7 Land Stewardship Zoning Guidelines 9 Management
    [Show full text]
  • COMMONWEALTH of MASSACHUSETTS SUFFOLK, Ss
    COMMONWEALTH OF MASSACHUSETTS SUFFOLK, ss SUPERIOR COURT _________________________________________ ) COMMONWEALTH OF MASSACHUSETTS, ) ) STATEMENT OF Plaintiff, ) INTEREST BY THE ) UNITED STATES v. ) ) PENNSYLVANIA HIGHER EDUCATION ) Case No. 1784CV02682 ASSISTANCE AGENCY, ) d/b/a FedLoan Servicing, ) ) Defendant. ) __________________________________________) INTRODUCTION The United States respectfully submits this brief pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 517.1 The United States has a substantial interest in, and a long history of, developing programs to help students access postsecondary education. For decades, the United States has sought to increase access to higher education by serving as a reinsurer and guarantor of private loans, serving as the sole originator and holder of Direct Loans, and also establishing a variety of other federal programs to aid students. Here, Massachusetts alleges that the Pennsylvania Higher Education Assistance Agency (PHEAA), an entity that contracts with the Federal Government to service federal loans, has violated state and federal consumer protection laws. As relevant here, Massachusetts alleges that PHEAA wrongfully failed to count periods of forbearance for borrowers to satisfy the requirements of certain loan forgiveness programs, that PHEAA 1 “The Solicitor General, or any officer of the Department of Justice, may be sent by the Attorney General to any State or district in the United States to attend to the interests of the United States in a suit pending in a court of the United States, or in a court of a State, or to attend to any other interest of the United States.” 28 U.S.C. § 517. wrongfully converted the grants of participants who had not filed the correct documentation for loans as required by the Teacher Education Assistance for College and Higher Education (TEACH) Grant Program, and that PHEAA wrongfully allocated certain overpayments to interest and fees.
    [Show full text]
  • Walden Pond R O Oa W R D L Oreau’S O R Ty I a K N N U 226 O
    TO MBTA FITCHBURG COMMUTER LINE ROUTE 495, ACTON h Fire d Sout Road North T 147 Fire Roa th Fir idge r Pa e e R a 167 Pond I R Pin i c o l Long Cove e ad F N Ice Fort Cove o or rt th Cove Roa Heywood’s Meadow d FIELD 187 l i Path ail Lo a w r Tr op r do e T a k e s h r F M E e t k a s a Heyw ’s E 187 i P 187 ood 206 r h d n a a w 167 o v o e T R n H e y t e v B 187 2 y n o a 167 w a 187 C y o h Little Cove t o R S r 167 d o o ’ H s F a e d m th M e loc Pa k 270 80 c e 100 I B a E e m a d 40 n W C Baker Bridge Road o EMERSON’S e Concord Road r o w s 60 F a n CLIFF i o e t c e R n l o 206 265 d r r o ’s 20 d t a o F d C Walden Pond R o oa w R d l oreau’s o r ty i a k n n u 226 o 246 Cove d C T d F Ol r o a O r i k l l d C 187 o h n h t THOREAU t c 187 a a HOUSE SITE o P P Wyman 167 r ORIGINAL d d 167 R l n e Meadow i o d ra P g .
    [Show full text]
  • Fish Population Sampling
    2005 Deerfield River Watershed Fish Population Assessment Robert J. Maietta Watershed Planning Program Worcester, MA January, 2007 CN: 223.4 Commonwealth of Massachusetts Executive Office of Environmental Affairs Ian Bowles, Secretary Department of Environmental Protection Arleen O’Donnell, Acting Commissioner Bureau of Resource Protection Glenn Haas, Acting Assistant Commissioner Division of Watershed Management Glenn Haas, Director Introduction Fish population surveys were conducted in the Deerfield River Watershed during the late summer of 2005 using techniques similar to Rapid Bioassessment Protocol V as described originally by Plafkin et al.(1989) and later by Barbour et al. (1999). Standard Operating Procedures are described in MassDEP Method CN 075.1 Fish Population SOP. Surveys also included a habitat assessment component modified from that described in the aforementioned document (Barbour et al. 1999). Fish populations were sampled by electrofishing using a Smith Root Model 12 battery powered backpack electrofisher. A reach of between 80m and 100m was sampled by passing a pole mounted anode ring, side to side through the stream channel and in and around likely fish holding cover. All fish shocked were netted and held in buckets. Sampling proceeded from an obstruction or constriction, upstream to an endpoint at another obstruction or constriction such as a waterfall or shallow riffle. Following completion of a sampling run, all fish were identified to species, measured, and released. Results of the fish population surveys can be found in Table 1. It should be noted that young of the year (yoy) fish from most species, with the exception of salmonids are not targeted for collection. Young-of-the-year fishes which are collected, either on purpose or inadvertently, are noted in Table 1.
    [Show full text]
  • Plymouth, Cape Cod and the Islands of Martha's Vineyard & Nantucket
    Plymouth, Cape Cod and the Islands of Martha’s Vineyard & Nantucket A summer trip to Massachusetts could be well-spent on the beautiful coast! Start by taking advantage of the new Cape Flyer weekend rail service from Boston to Buzzards Bay or Hyannis – the site of the Kennedy family home. Trains will depart from Boston’s South Station every Friday, Saturday and Sunday May-October; return service the same days. capeflyer.com If you’re driving, take your time, stopping along the way to check out the many cranberry bogs throughout Plymouth County. Your first stop, however, should be in the town of Plymouth itself. As the landing location and subsequent settlement for the Mayflower's Pilgrims in 1620, Plymouth, just 40 minutes south of Boston, is home to one of the greatest dramas in the founding of America. And, it was here in 1621, where the Pilgrims celebrated what is now known as the first Thanksgiving with their Wampanoag neighbors. Situated about 40 miles south of Boston along Massachusetts' South Shore, Plymouth unfolds along a scenic harbor of blue waters and picturesque boats. In “America’s Hometown," you'll get a glimpse of Plymouth Rock — and the Pilgrim way of life – at Plimoth Plantation. This bi-cultural living history museum offers a re- created 17th century English Village that includes Colonial interpreters who bring the era to life, a Native Wampanoag Homesite, Crafts Center and numerous Museum Shops. The reproduction Mayflower II, a full-scale reproduction of the Pilgrims’ original ship is located at State Pier just a stone’s throw from Plymouth Rock, that historic piece of granite thought to be the stepping stone for these courageous settlers into the New World.
    [Show full text]
  • Earned Sick Time Faqs
    Massachusetts Attorney General’s Office – Earned Sick Time FAQs Earned Sick Time in Massachusetts Frequently Asked Questions These FAQs are based upon the Massachusetts Earned Sick Time Law, M.G.L. c. 149, § 148C, and its accompanying regulations, 940 CMR 33.00. The Earned Sick Time Law sets minimum requirements; employers may choose to provide more generous policies. Table of Contents Section 1: Introduction, Applicability & Eligibility .......................................................................................................... 2 Subsection A: Introduction .......................................................................................................................................... 2 Subsection B: Employees Eligible for Earned Sick Time ............................................................................................... 2 Subsection C: Which Employers Need to Provide Earned Sick Time? ......................................................................... 4 Section 2: Paid versus Unpaid Earned Sick Time ............................................................................................................. 5 Section 3: General Rules .................................................................................................................................................. 6 Subsection A: How is Earned Sick Time Accrued? ....................................................................................................... 6 Subsection B: Carryover of hours from one year to the next .....................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Dukes County, Massachusetts (All Jurisdictions)
    DUKES COUNTY, MASSACHUSETTS (ALL JURISDICTIONS) COMMUNITY NAME COMMUNITY NUMBER AQUINNAH, TOWN OF 250070 CHILMARK, TOWN OF 250068 EDGARTOWN, TOWN OF 250069 GOSNOLD, TOWN OF 250071 OAK BLUFFS, TOWN OF 250072 TISBURY, TOWN OF 250073 WEST TISBURY, TOWN OF 250074 Dukes County Federal Emergency Management Agency FLOOD INSURANCE STUDY NUMBER 25007CV000B NOTICE TO FLOOD INSURANCE STUDY USERS Communities participating in the National Flood Insurance Program have established repositories of flood hazard data for floodplain management and flood insurance purposes. This Flood Insurance Study (FIS) may not contain all data available within the repository. It is advisable to contact the community repository for any additional data. Selected Flood Insurance Rate Map panels for the community contain information that was previously shown separately on the corresponding Flood Boundary and Floodway Map panels (e.g., floodways, cross sections). In addition, former flood hazard zone designations have been changed as follows: Old Zone New Zone A1 through A30 AE V1 through V30 VE B X C X Part or all of this Flood Insurance Study may be revised and republished at any time. In addition, part of this Flood Insurance Study may be revised by the Letter of Map Revision process, which does not involve republication or redistribution of the Flood Insurance Study. It is, therefore, the responsibility of the user to consult with community officials and to check the community repository to obtain the most current Flood Insurance Study components. Initial Countywide FIS
    [Show full text]
  • Favorite Cruising Spots in Buzzard's Bay and Vineyard Sound Cuttyhunk Island—Typically a 1.5 Hour Sail on a Close Reach; A
    Favorite Cruising spots in Buzzard’s Bay and Vineyard Sound Cuttyhunk Island—typically a 1.5 hour sail on a close reach; a tiny island and crowded anchorage but a fun and very popular place to stop and walk around, stop for lunch or stay overnight. Inner Harbor is well-protected with both moorings and small anchorage available. Moorings also available along beach outside of breakwater between harbor and Nashawena, and good holding ground for anchoring outside of breakwater if anchorage is full. Lovely view of Elizabeth Island chain from top of hill. There is a market on the way up the hill from the main dock on your left. Also a store with Cuttyhunk “stuff” on the right after the dock. Also a tiny shack to the left which has AMAZING clothing and jewelry—bring cash! Fun local pizza called SOPRANO’s (“pizza to die for”). The best kept secret is “Cuttyhunk Fishing Club” which serves THE BEST breakfast al fresco on their porch on a hill overlooking the Elizabeth Islands and Martha’s Vineyard. Quick’s Hole—The safest passage between Buzzard’s Bay and Vineyard Sound. Quicks is nestled between Pasque and Nashawena Islands (two more Elizabeth Islands) and as such is normally protected from wind and seas. There’s a lovely white sand beach with dunes and lots of good anchorage fairly close up. Great lunch spot. The beach can be closed at random by the owners of Naushon Island however. Lambert’s Cove on North side of Martha’s Vineyard on Vineyard Sound side. Nice beach with dunes for a swim and picnic lunch in normal SW wind.
    [Show full text]
  • Parker River National Wildlife Refuge Canoeing/Kayaking Information
    U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service Parker River National Wildlife Refuge Canoeing/Kayaking Information Thank you for your interest in recommended. Do not rely on the map Permits and Fees canoeing/kayaking at Parker River on the reverse which is intended only A permit is not required. However, a National Wildlife Refuge. Please read for general orientation. Also check refuge entrance fee applies to access the following information thoroughly the forecast to avoid being caught in the boat ramp for launching. A Daily so that we may ensure your canoeing/ inclement weather. During the warmer refuge entrance fee of $5/vehicle or $2/ kayaking experience is as safe and months, mosquitoes and other biting walk-on or bicycle is in effect year- enjoyable as possible. Please do not insects can be very bothersome. round. Annual passes and commercial hesitate to contact us if you have any Greenheads are aggressive, blood rates are available. questions or concerns. feeding horse flies that may be Enjoy your visit! abundant from July through mid- Parker River National Wildlife Refuge August. From September 15 - May 15, 6 Plum Island Turnpike General all canoe and kayak occupants must Newburyport, MA 01950 Opportunities are available to launch wear a U.S. Coast Guard approved 978/465 5753 a non-motorized canoe, kayak, or Personal Flotation Device. 978/465 2807 Fax rowboat from the refuge for access to e-mail:[email protected] Plum Island Sound and points beyond. Suggested Equipment and Supplies www.fws.gov/northeast/parkerriver All boat motors (including electric) and n extra paddle the launching of all other watercraft, n sunglasses Federal Relay Service including sailboats, are prohibited.
    [Show full text]