DOCSLIB.ORG

2021 Income Limits Borrowers Whose Total Household Income Does Not Exceed 100% of Area Median Income May Qualify for the ONE Mortgage Program

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
2021 Income Limits Borrowers Whose Total Household Income Does Not Exceed 100% of Area Median Income May Qualify for the ONE Mortgage Program 2021 Income Limits Borrowers whose total household income does not exceed 100% of area median income may qualify for the ONE Mortgage Program. Borrowers below 80% area median income may be eligible for MHP subsidy. Barnstable County Barnstable (includes: Centerville, Cotuit, Hyannis, Marstons Mills, Osterville, West Barnstable), Bourne, Brewster, Chatham, Dennis, Eastham, Falmouth, Harwich, Mashpee, Orleans, Provincetown, Sandwich, Truro, Wellfleet, Yarmouth Household Size 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 80% Income Limit $54,450 $62,200 $70,000 $77,750 $84,000 $90,200 $96,450 $102,650 100% Income Limit $68,100 $77,750 $87,500 $97,200 $105,000 $112,750 $120,600 $128,350 Berkshire County Alford, Becket, Clarksburg, Egremont, Florida, Great Barrington, Hancock, Monterey, Mount Washington, New Ashford, New Marlborough, North Adams, Otis, Peru, Sandisfield, Savoy, Sheffield, Tyringham, Washington, West Stockbridge, Williamstown, Windsor Household Size 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 80% Income Limit $49,700 $56,800 $63,900 $70,950 $76,650 $82,350 $88,000 $93,700 100% Income Limit $62,150 $71,000 $79,900 $88,700 $95,850 $102,950 $110,000 $117,150 Adams, Cheshire, Dalton, Hinsdale, Lanesborough, Lee, Lenox, Pittsfield, Richmond, Stockbridge Household Size 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 80% Income Limit $50,900 $58,200 $65,450 $72,700 $78,550 $84,350 $90,150 $96,000 100% Income Limit $63,650 $72,750 $81,850 $90,900 $98,200 $105,450 $112,700 $120,000 Bristol County Easton, Raynham Household Size 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 80% Income Limit $71,300 $81,500 $91,700 $101,850 $110,000 $118,150 $126,300 $134,450 100% Income Limit $89,150 $101,900 $114,650 $127,350 $137,500 $147,700 $157,900 $168,100 Acushnet, Dartmouth, Fairhaven, Freetown, New Bedford Household Size 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 80% Income Limit $47,150 $53,850 $60,600 $67,300 $72,700 $78,100 $83,500 $88,850 100% Income Limit $57,350 $65,550 $73,750 $81,950 $88,500 $95,050 $101,600 $108,150 Page 1 of 5 Updated April 2021 Attleboro, Fall River, North Attleborough, Rehoboth, Seekonk, Somerset, Swansea, Westport Household Size 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 80% Income Limit $48,750 $55,700 $62,650 $69,600 $75,200 $80,750 $86,350 $91,900 100% Income Limit $60,950 $69,650 $78,350 $87,000 $94,000 $100,950 $107,950 $114,900 Berkley, Dighton, Mansfield, Norton, Taunton Household Size 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 80% Income Limit $55,950 $63,950 $71,950 $79,900 $86,300 $92,700 $99,100 $105,500 100% Income Limit $69,950 $79,950 $89,950 $99,900 $107,900 $115,900 $123,900 $131,900 Dukes County Aquinnah, Chilmark, Edgartown, Gosnold, Oak Bluffs, Tisbury, West Tisbury Household Size 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 80% Income Limit $59,200 $67,650 $76,100 $84,550 $91,350 $98,100 $104,850 $111,650 100% Income Limit $74,000 $84,600 $95,150 $105,700 $114,200 $122,650 $131,100 $139,600 Essex County Amesbury, Beverly, Danvers, Essex, Gloucester, Hamilton, Ipswich, Lynn, Lynnfield, Manchester by the Sea, Marblehead, Middleton, Nahant, Newbury, Newburyport, Peabody, Rockport, Rowley, Salem, Salisbury, Saugus, Swampscott, Topsfield, Wenham Household Size 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 80% Income Limit $70,750 $80,850 $90,950 $101,050 $109,150 $117,250 $125,350 $133,400 100% Income Limit $88,450 $101,100 $113,700 $126,350 $136,450 $146,600 $156,700 $166,750 Andover, Boxford, Georgetown, Groveland, Haverhill, Lawrence, Merrimac, Methuen, North Andover, West Newbury Household Size 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 80% Income Limit $57,650 $65,850 $74,100 $82,300 $88,900 $95,500 $102,100 $108,650 100% Income Limit $72,100 $82,350 $92,650 $102,900 $111,150 $119,400 $127,650 $135,850 Franklin County Ashfield, Bernardston, Buckland, Charlemont, Colrain, Conway, Deerfield, Erving, Gill, Greenfield, Hawley, Heath, Leverett, Leyden, Monroe, Montague, New Salem, Northfield, Orange, Rowe, Shelburne, Shutesbury, Sunderland, Warwick, Wendell, Whately Household Size 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 80% Income Limit $49,700 $56,800 $63,900 $70,950 $76,650 $82,350 $88,000 $93,700 100% Income Limit $62,150 $71,000 $79,900 $88,700 $95,850 $102,950 $110,000 $117,150 Page 2 of 5 Updated April 2021 Hampden County Agawam, Blandford, Brimfield, Chester, Chicopee, East Longmeadow, Granville, Hampden, Holland, Holyoke, Longmeadow, Ludlow, Monson, Montgomery, Palmer, Russell, Southwick, Springfield, Tolland, Wales, Westfield, West Springfield, Wilbraham Household Size 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 80% Income Limit $49,700 $56,800 $63,900 $70,950 $76,650 $82,350 $88,000 $93,700 100% Income Limit $62,150 $71,000 $79,900 $88,700 $95,850 $102,950 $110,000 $117,150 Hampshire County Amherst, Belchertown, Chesterfield, Cummington, Easthampton, Goshen, Granby, Hadley, Hatfield, Huntington, Middlefield, Northampton, Pelham, Plainfield, Southampton, South Hadley, Ware, Westhampton, Williamsburg, Worthington Household Size 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 80% Income Limit $49,700 $56,800 $63,900 $70,950 $76,650 $82,350 $88,000 $93,700 100% Income Limit $62,150 $71,000 $79,900 $88,700 $95,850 $102,950 $110,000 $117,150 Middlesex County Acton, Arlington, Ashby, Ashland, Ayer, Bedford, Belmont, Boxborough, Burlington, Cambridge, Carlisle, Concord, Everett, Framingham, Holliston, Hopkinton, Hudson, Lexington, Lincoln, Littleton, Malden, Marlborough, Maynard, Medford, Melrose, Natick, Newton, North Reading, Reading, Sherborn, Shirley, Somerville, Stoneham, Stow, Sudbury, Townsend, Wakefield, Waltham, Watertown, Wayland, Weston, Wilmington, Winchester, Woburn Household Size 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 80% Income Limit $70,750 $80,850 $90,950 $101,050 $109,150 $117,250 $125,350 $133,400 100% Income Limit $88,450 $101,100 $113,700 $126,350 $136,450 $146,600 $156,700 $166,750 Billerica, Chelmsford, Dracut, Dunstable, Groton, Lowell, Pepperell, Tewksbury, Tyngsborough, Westford Household Size 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 80% Income Limit $63,250 $72,250 $81,300 $90,300 $97,550 $104,750 $112,000 $119,200 100% Income Limit $79,100 $90,350 $101,650 $112,900 $121,950 $130,950 $140,000 $149,000 Nantucket County Nantucket Household Size 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 80% Income Limit $58,950 $67,350 $75,750 $84,150 $90,900 $97,650 $104,350 $111,100 100% Income Limit $73,700 $84,200 $94,700 $105,200 $113,650 $122,100 $130,450 $138,900 Page 3 of 5 Updated April 2021 Norfolk County Bellingham, Braintree, Brookline, Canton, Cohasset, Dedham, Dover, Foxborough, Franklin, Holbrook, Medfield, Medway, Millis, Milton, Needham, Norfolk, Norwood, Plainville, Quincy, Randolph, Sharon, Stoughton, Walpole, Wellesley, Westwood, Weymouth, Wrentham Household Size 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 80% Income Limit $70,750 $80,850 $90,950 $101,050 $109,150 $117,250 $125,350 $133,400 100% Income Limit $88,450 $101,100 $113,700 $126,350 $136,450 $146,600 $156,700 $166,750 Avon Household Size 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 80% Income Limit $55,950 $63,950 $71,950 $79,900 $86,300 $92,700 $99,100 $105,500 100% Income Limit $69,950 $79,950 $89,950 $99,900 $107,900 $115,900 $123,900 $131,900 Plymouth County Abington, Bridgewater, Brockton, East Bridgewater, Halifax, Hanson, Lakeville, Marion, Mattapoisett, Middleborough, Plympton, Rochester, West Bridgewater, Whitman Household Size 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 80% Income Limit $55,950 $63,950 $71,950 $79,900 $86,300 $92,700 $99,100 $105,500 100% Income Limit $69,950 $79,950 $89,950 $99,900 $107,900 $115,900 $123,900 $131,900 Carver, Duxbury, Hanover, Hingham, Hull, Kingston, Marshfield, Norwell, Pembroke, Plymouth, Rockland, Scituate, Wareham Household Size 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 80% Income Limit $70,750 $80,850 $90,950 $101,050 $109,150 $117,250 $125,350 $133,400 100% Income Limit $88,450 $101,100 $113,700 $126,350 $136,450 $146,600 $156,700 $166,750 Suffolk County Boston (includes: Allston, Back Bay, Brighton, Charlestown, Dorchester, East Boston, Hyde Park, Jamaica Plain, Mattapan, North End, Roslindale, Roxbury, South Boston, South End, West Roxbury), Chelsea, Revere, Winthrop Household Size 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 80% Income Limit $70,750 $80,850 $90,950 $101,050 $109,150 $117,250 $125,350 $133,400 100% Income Limit $88,450 $101,100 $113,700 $126,350 $136,450 $146,600 $156,700 $166,750 Page 4 of 5 Updated April 2021 Worcester County Ashburnham, Fitchburg, Gardner, Leominster, Lunenburg, Templeton, Westminster, Winchendon Household Size 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 80% Income Limit $50,200 $57,400 $64,550 $71,700 $77,450 $83,200 $88,950 $94,650 100% Income Limit $62,750 $71,750 $80,700 $89,650 $96,850 $104,000 $111,200 $118,350 Berlin, Blackstone, Bolton, Harvard, Hopedale, Lancaster, Mendon, Milford, Millville, Southborough, Upton Household Size 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 80% Income Limit $65,600 $75,000 $84,350 $93,700 $101,200 $108,700 $116,200 $123,700 100% Income Limit $82,000 $93,750 $105,450 $117,150 $126,500 $135,900 $145,250 $154,650 Athol, Hardwick, Hubbardston, New Braintree, Petersham, Phillipston, Royalston, Warren Household Size 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 80% Income Limit $49,700 $56,800 $63,900 $70,950 $76,650 $82,350 $88,000 $93,700 100% Income Limit $62,150 $71,000 $79,900 $88,700 $95,850 $102,950 $110,000 $117,150 Auburn, Barre, Boylston, Brookfield, Charlton, Clinton, Douglas, Dudley, East Brookfield, Grafton, Holden, Leicester, Millbury, Northborough, Northbridge, North Brookfield, Oakham, Oxford, Paxton, Princeton, Rutland, Shrewsbury, Southbridge, Spencer, Sterling, Sturbridge, Sutton, Uxbridge, Webster, Westborough, West Boylston, West Brookfield, Worcester Household Size 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 80% Income Limit $55,350 $63,250 $71,150 $79,050 $85,400 $91,700 $98,050 $104,350 100% Income Limit $69,200 $79,100 $88,950 $98,850 $106,750 $114,650 $122,600 $130,450 Page 5 of 5 Updated April 2021 .
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Martha's Vineyard Statistical Profile February 2019
    Martha’s Vineyard Statistical Profile February 2019 www.mvcommission.org PO Box 1447, 33 New York Ave, Oak Bluffs, MA 02557 [email protected] p-508-693-3453; f-508-693-7894 Health and Education 41 County health rankings: County, 2018 41 Health trends: County (various time ranges) 42 Number of arrests per town, 2007–2017 43 Arrest rate by town, 2016 43 Lyme disease cases: County comparison, 2000–2015 43 Lyme disease rates: County comparison, 2015 43 Opioid overdose deaths: County comparison, 2000–2016 44 Opioid overdose death rate: County comparison, 2016 44 Homelessness: County, 2015–2018 45 Martha’s Vineyard Center for Living and Serving Hands food distribution: County, 2013–2017 45 SNAP participation by town (percent of population), 2010–2016 45 Martha’s Vineyard Community Services: Services provided in 2017 46 Martha’s Vineyard Hospital inpatient discharges and emergency visits, 2010–2018 46 Martha’s Vineyard Hospital’s 2016 Community Health Assessment and Implementation Strategy (selected tables and charts) 47 Educational attainment by town, 2016 49 Adult education enrollment: Island 2009–2018 50 School enrollment by Island school, 2007–2017 50 Enrollment by gender (percent of school), 2017–2018 51 Selected populations (percent of school), 2017–2018 51 Plans of high school graduates (percent of students), 2016–2017 51 HEALTH AND EDUCATION The County Health Rankings, a collaboration between the Robert Wood Johnson Foundation and the University of Wisconsin Population Health Institute, measures vital health factors in counties across the United States. The program helps communi- ties understand what factors influence their overall quality and length of life, as outlined in the chart below.
    [Show full text]
  • Boston Produced in 2012
    BioMap2 CONSERVING THE BIODIVERSITY OF MASSACHUSETTS IN A CHANGING WORLD Boston Produced in 2012 This report and associated map provide information about important sites for biodiversity conservation in your area. This information is intended for conservation planning, and is not intended for use in state regulations. BioMap2 Conserving the Biodiversity of Massachusetts in a Changing World Table of Contents Introduction What is BioMap2 – Purpose and applications One plan, two components Understanding Core Habitat and its components Understanding Critical Natural Landscape and its components Understanding Core Habitat and Critical Natural Landscape Summaries Sources of Additional Information Boston Overview Core Habitat and Critical Natural Landscape Summaries Elements of BioMap2 Cores Core Habitat Summaries Elements of BioMap2 Critical Natural Landscapes Critical Natural Landscape Summaries Natural Heritage Massachusetts Division of Fisheries and Wildlife 1 Rabbit Hill Road, Westborough, MA 01581 & Endangered phone: 508‐389‐6360 fax: 508‐389‐7890 Species Program For more information on rare species and natural communities, please see our fact sheets online at www.mass.gov/nhesp. BioMap2 Conserving the Biodiversity of Massachusetts in a Changing World Introduction The Massachusetts Department of Fish & Game, through the Division of Fisheries and Wildlife’s Natural Heritage & Endangered Species Program (NHESP), and The Nature Conservancy’s Massachusetts Program developed BioMap2 to protect the state’s biodiversity in the context of climate change. BioMap2 combines NHESP’s 30 years of rigorously documented rare species and natural community data with spatial data identifying wildlife species and habitats that were the focus of the Division of Fisheries and Wildlife’s 2005 State Wildlife Action Plan (SWAP).
    [Show full text]
  • Cuttyhunk-Nantucket 24-Quadrangle Area of Cape Cod and Islands, Southeast Massachusetts
    Prepared in cooperation with the Commonwealth of Massachusetts Office of the State Geologist and Executive Office of Energy and Environmental Affairs Surficial Geologic Map of the Pocasset-Provincetown- Cuttyhunk-Nantucket 24-Quadrangle Area of Cape Cod and Islands, Southeast Massachusetts Compiled by Byron D. Stone and Mary L. DiGiacomo-Cohen Open-File Report 2006-1260-E U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey U.S. Department of the Interior KEN SALAZAR, Secretary U.S. Geological Survey Marcia K. McNutt, Director U.S. Geological Survey, Reston, Virginia: 2009 For product and ordering information: World Wide Web: http://www.usgs.gov/pubprod Telephone: 1-888-ASK-USGS For more information on the USGS—the Federal source for science about the Earth, its natural and living resources, natural hazards, and the environment: World Wide Web: http://www.usgs.gov Telephone: 1-888-ASK-USGS Suggested citation: Stone, B.D., and DiGiacomo-Cohen, M.L., comps., 2009, Surficial geologic map of the Pocasset­ Provincetown-Cuttyhunk-Nantucket 24-quadrangle area of Cape Cod and Islands, southeast Massachusetts: U.S. Geological Survey Open-File Report 2006-1260-E. Any use of trade, product, or firm names is for descriptive purposes only and does not imply endorsement by the U.S. Government. Although this report is in the public domain, permission must be secured from the individual copyright owners to reproduce any copyrighted materials contained within this report. Cover figure. Photograph of eroding cliffs at Gay Head on Martha’s Vineyard (source:
    [Show full text]
  • 495/Metrowest Profile Prepared for the 495/Metrowest Suburban Edge Community Commission
    495/MetroWest Profile Prepared for the 495/MetroWest Suburban Edge Community Commission 495/MetroWest Suburban Edge Community Commission The 495/ MetroWest Suburban Edge Community Commission was established by the Legislature in Section 233 of Chapter 119 of the Session Laws of 2015. The commission will study development challenges experienced by edge communities, including transportation, water, cellular, and energy infrastructure, transit services, residential development, reuse of former industrial facilities and historic mills, brownfields reclamation, downtown redevelopment and other such constraints. The commission will then develop policy responses and recommendations to ensure that edge communities can participate in state development initiatives and benefit from state resources. The commission will focus its investigation and study on the 35 municipalities served by the 495/MetroWest Corridor Partnership, Inc. and develop a pilot program to address the issues to be studied and investigated by the commission. Our Mission The mission of the Public Policy Center (PPC) at UMass Dartmouth is to: Inform evidence-based policy making. Improve public understanding of critical policy issues. Provide educational and research opportunities to our faculty and students. Connect the resources of the University of Massachusetts to the communities we serve. The PPC's primary goal is to inform public policy discussions by providing policy makers with university quality research, technical assistance, and analytical services designed to help make our state, region, and communities better places to live, work, and do business. We do this by leveraging the substantial skills of our students and faculty partners, and enhancing the connections between the University and the communities it serves. TABLE OF CONTENTS 1.0 The 495/MetroWest Region ............................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Plymouth, Cape Cod and the Islands of Martha's Vineyard & Nantucket
    Plymouth, Cape Cod and the Islands of Martha’s Vineyard & Nantucket A summer trip to Massachusetts could be well-spent on the beautiful coast! Start by taking advantage of the new Cape Flyer weekend rail service from Boston to Buzzards Bay or Hyannis – the site of the Kennedy family home. Trains will depart from Boston’s South Station every Friday, Saturday and Sunday May-October; return service the same days. capeflyer.com If you’re driving, take your time, stopping along the way to check out the many cranberry bogs throughout Plymouth County. Your first stop, however, should be in the town of Plymouth itself. As the landing location and subsequent settlement for the Mayflower's Pilgrims in 1620, Plymouth, just 40 minutes south of Boston, is home to one of the greatest dramas in the founding of America. And, it was here in 1621, where the Pilgrims celebrated what is now known as the first Thanksgiving with their Wampanoag neighbors. Situated about 40 miles south of Boston along Massachusetts' South Shore, Plymouth unfolds along a scenic harbor of blue waters and picturesque boats. In “America’s Hometown," you'll get a glimpse of Plymouth Rock — and the Pilgrim way of life – at Plimoth Plantation. This bi-cultural living history museum offers a re- created 17th century English Village that includes Colonial interpreters who bring the era to life, a Native Wampanoag Homesite, Crafts Center and numerous Museum Shops. The reproduction Mayflower II, a full-scale reproduction of the Pilgrims’ original ship is located at State Pier just a stone’s throw from Plymouth Rock, that historic piece of granite thought to be the stepping stone for these courageous settlers into the New World.
    [Show full text]
  • Dukes County, Massachusetts (All Jurisdictions)
    DUKES COUNTY, MASSACHUSETTS (ALL JURISDICTIONS) COMMUNITY NAME COMMUNITY NUMBER AQUINNAH, TOWN OF 250070 CHILMARK, TOWN OF 250068 EDGARTOWN, TOWN OF 250069 GOSNOLD, TOWN OF 250071 OAK BLUFFS, TOWN OF 250072 TISBURY, TOWN OF 250073 WEST TISBURY, TOWN OF 250074 Dukes County Federal Emergency Management Agency FLOOD INSURANCE STUDY NUMBER 25007CV000B NOTICE TO FLOOD INSURANCE STUDY USERS Communities participating in the National Flood Insurance Program have established repositories of flood hazard data for floodplain management and flood insurance purposes. This Flood Insurance Study (FIS) may not contain all data available within the repository. It is advisable to contact the community repository for any additional data. Selected Flood Insurance Rate Map panels for the community contain information that was previously shown separately on the corresponding Flood Boundary and Floodway Map panels (e.g., floodways, cross sections). In addition, former flood hazard zone designations have been changed as follows: Old Zone New Zone A1 through A30 AE V1 through V30 VE B X C X Part or all of this Flood Insurance Study may be revised and republished at any time. In addition, part of this Flood Insurance Study may be revised by the Letter of Map Revision process, which does not involve republication or redistribution of the Flood Insurance Study. It is, therefore, the responsibility of the user to consult with community officials and to check the community repository to obtain the most current Flood Insurance Study components. Initial Countywide FIS
    [Show full text]
  • LOCALLY COORDINATED TRANSPORTATION PLAN for the Greater Nashua and Milford Region
    LOCALLY COORDINATED TRANSPORTATION PLAN For the Greater Nashua and Milford Region Locally Coordinated Transportation Plan For the Greater Nashua and Milford Region 2020-2024 Adopted: April 15, 2020 LOCALLY COORDINATED TRANSPORTATION PLAN For the Greater Nashua and Milford Region ACKNOWLEDGMENTS Community Input Participants Bridges: Domestic & Sexual Violence Support Servicelink City of Nashua Welfare/Human Services Department Souhegan Valley Transportation Collaborative Front Door Agency Southern NH HIV/AIDS Task Force Gentle Car Rides, LLC Southern NH Services Granite State Independent Living St. John Neumann Day Away Harbor Homes, Inc St. Joseph’s Community Services, Inc. Interested Public Toward Independent Living and Learning, Inc. Keystone Hall Town of Amherst Welfare/Human Services Department Milford Taxi Town of Brookline Welfare/Human Services Department Nashua Center Town of Hollis Welfare/Human Services Department Nashua Soup Kitchen & Shelter, Inc. Town of Hudson Welfare/Human Services Department Nashua Transit System Town of Litchfield Welfare/Human Services Department Opportunity Networks Town of Mason Welfare/Human Services Department Partnership for Successful Living Town of Merrimack Welfare/Human Services Department Pelham Senior Center Town of Milford Welfare/Human Services Department PLUS Company, Inc. Town of Pelham Welfare/Human Services Department SHARE Outreach Town of Wilton Welfare/Human Services Department Steering Committee Nashua Regional Planning Commission Steve Genest, Southern New Hampshire Services Jay
    [Show full text]
  • Rhode Island Rapid Rail
    RHODE ISLAND RAPID RAIL A Strategy for Economic Growth Concept Paper March 2019 Grow Smart RI Board of Directors Gail E. McCann Wilfrid L. Gates Board Chair Michael S. Hudner Stanley J. Kanter Lloyd Albert Michael F. Ryan William Baldwin Deming E. Sherman Daniel A. Baudouin W. Edward Wood Samuel J. Bradner Kenneth Burnett John Chambers Acknowledgements Sharon D. Conard-Wells Gib Conover Grow Smart RI thanks its pro-bono planning Trudy Coxe and transportation consultants Roger Leaf of Michael A. DeCataldo New York City and Peter Brassard of Dennis DiPrete Newport, RI and New York City for their Maia Farish leadership in concept development, analysis Travis Escobar and research that made this proposal Michael L. Friedman possible. Glenn Gardiner Brian Goldberg Cover images and graphic concepts courtesy Karen Grande of Roger Williams University student intern Dr. William H. Hollinshead Karita N. Lipdo. Jason E. Kelly Xaykham Khamsyvoravong Howard M. Kilguss Purpose Jane S. Long This paper is being submitted to RIPTA and Pat Moran its planning consultants for consideration Jay O'Grady and evaluation as part of Rhode Island’s first- Taino Palermo ever Transit Master Planning process now Donald W. Powers underway. Lucie G. Searle Pamela M. Sherrill Julia Anne M. Slom Grow Smart RI Joseph T. Wanat 1 Empire St, Suite 523 George Watson III Providence, RI 02903 Martha L. Werenfels 401-273-5711 Nancy Parker Wilson www.GrowSmartRI.org Directors Emeritus Arnold "Buff" Chace Louise Durfee, Esq. Grow Smart RI 1 Table of Contents Introduction .......................................................................................................... 2 Rethinking mobility in RI ..................................................................................... 2 Rhode Island Rapid Rail........................................................................................ 3 Better Connecting People with Jobs .................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Rhode Island - Massachusettsme Area NH VT
    The Selected Alternative: Connecticut - Rhode Island - MassachusettsME Area NH VT Albany MA Worcester Boston The Federal Railroad Administration (FRA) sponsored NY Today’s Springfield the NEC FUTURE program to create a comprehensive Hartford Northeast RI Providence plan for improving the Northeast Corridor (NEC) CT Corridor New London from Washington, D.C., to Boston, MA. Through NEC Bridgeport New London/Mystic FUTURE, the FRA has worked closely with NEC states, Stamford New Haven railroads, stakeholders, and the public to define a Newark common vision for the corridor’s future. NJ 457 Miles PA New York OF TRACK TOOK NEARLY A Harrisburg CENTURY TO BUILD Trenton Selecting the Grow Vision Philadelphia Wilmington 750,000+ The Selected Alternative provides the level of service WV MD NJ Daily Passengers Baltimore necessary to grow the role of rail in the regional MAKES THIS THE BUSIEST RAIL CORRIDOR IN THE NATION transportation system. The Selected Alternative DE Washington, D.C. will improve the reliability, capacity, connectivity, performance, and resiliency of passenger rail services 7 Million Jobs WITHIN 5 MILES OF NEC STATIONS on the NEC to meet future Northeast mobility needs VA for 2040 and beyond. Richmond Existing NEC Relative number of daily passengers Commercial area around stations Area Benefits The Selected Alternative brings the NEC to a state of good repair, eliminates chokepoints that delay trains, IMPROVE RAIL SERVICE and supports significant growth in service, including: Corridor-wide service and performance objectives for frequency, travel time, design speed, and passenger convenience. A new Regional rail station in Pawtucket, RI ୭ improves connectivity to the NEC in northeast MODERNIZE NEC INFRASTRUCTURE Rhode Island Corridor-wide repair, replacement, and rehabilitation of the existing NEC Boston South Station expansion, consistent to bring the corridor into a state of good repair and increase reliability.
    [Show full text]
  • Boston-Worcester-Providence, MA-RI-NH-CT Combined Statistical Area
    Boston-Worcester-Providence, MA-RI-NH-CT Combined Statistical Area CUMBERLAND ME NH GRAFTON CARROLL Laconia RUTLAND WINDSOR E R Laconia I T BELKNAP H YORK N S P O Laconia M M SULLIVAN A Concord R E H MERRIMACK STRAFFORD V W Concord E Concord N VERMONT NEWYORK Rockingham County- WINDHAM Manchester Strafford County HILLSBOROUGH ROCKINGHAM BENNINGTON CHESHIRE MANCHESTER- NASHUA MANCHESTER- VERMONT NASHUA Cambridge- Atlantic Nashua Ocean MASSACHUSETTS Newton- Framingham BOSTON- CAMBRIDGE- ESSEX KEY FRANKLIN Boston- QUINCY Worcester- 1 Framingham Providence MIDDLESEX 2 Cambridge BERKSHIRE 3 Boston WORCESTER Waltham 2 SUFFOLK HAMPSHIRE WORCESTER Newton 3 Worcester 1 WORCESTER Boston- NORFOLK Boston HAMPDEN Worcester- BOSTON- MASSACHUSETTS Manchester CAMBRIDGE- CONNECTICUT NEWTON HARTFORD TOLLAND PROVIDENCE- Willimantic NEW BEDFORD- PLYMOUTH BARNSTABLE LITCHFIELD Hartford- FALL RIVER TOWN WINDHAM BARNSTABLE West Hartford- Providence BRISTOL Willimantic PROVIDENCE TOWN HARTFORD-WEST Warwick Barnstable BARNSTABLE HARTFORD-EAST KENT Town HARTFORD BRISTOL MA RI NEW PROVIDENCE- MIDDLESEX LONDON WARWICK NEW WASHINGTON NEWPORT HAVEN DUKES NANTUCKET FAIRFIELD UT ECTIC ONN K C YOR NEW LEGEND Boston-Worcester- Providence 2012 Combined Statistical Area BARNSTABLE TOWN 2012 Metropolitan Statistical Area Laconia 2012 Micropolitan Statistical Area Boston 2012 Metropolitan Divisions 0 10 20 30 40Kilometers Waltham 2012 Principal City Boston-Worcester- 0 10 20 30 40Miles Manchester 2007 Combined Statistical Area WORCESTER 2007 Metropolitan Statistical Area Concord 2007 Micropolitan Statistical Area 2012 Combined Statistical Area (CSA) and Metropolitan/Micropolitan CONNECTICUT State or Statistical Equivalent Statistical Area (CBSA) boundaries and names are as of February 2013. TOLLAND County or Statistical Equivalent 2007 Combined Statistical Areas (CSA) and Metropolitan/Micropolitan Statistical Areas (CBSA) are as of December 2006.
    [Show full text]
  • Massachusetts York
    Orange Carroll Addison Grafton Belknap Massachusetts York Strafford Windsor Rutland Three rural definitions Merrimack Sullivan based on Census Places Rockingham Hillsborough Windham Cheshire Essex Bennington Washington Rural locations are those outside Census Places with a population... Middlesex Suffolk Franklin Suffolk ...greater than or equal to 2,500 Rensselaer Worcester Outside Census Places >= 2,500 people Norfolk Hampshire Plymouth ...greater than or equal to 10,000 Berkshire Barnstable Hampden Bristol Outside Census Places >= 2,500 people Columbia Providence Bristol Census Places: 2,500 - 9,999 Windham Bristol Tolland Newport Kent Newport Dukes ...greater than or equal to 50,000 Hartford Newport Dukes Nantucket Newport Washington Outside Census Places >= 2,500 people Litchfield New London Dutchess Census Places: 2,500 - 9,999 Middlesex Census Places: 10,000 - 49,999 New Haven Putnam Urban locations under all Orange Fairfield three defintions: Westchester Census Places: >= 50,000 people Rockland Suffolk Bergen Nassau Bronx For more information on definitions, Passaic see documentation Orange Carroll Addison Grafton Belknap Massachusetts York Strafford Windsor Rutland Three rural definitions Merrimack Sullivan based on Census Urban Areas Rockingham Hillsborough Windham Cheshire Essex Bennington Washington Rural locations are those outside Census Urban Areas Middlesex Suffolk with a population... Franklin Suffolk Rensselaer Worcester ...greater than or equal to 2,500 Norfolk Hampshire Plymouth Outside Census Urban Areas >= 2,500
    [Show full text]
  • Suffolk County Government Effectively Eliminated Sheriff's Functions
    October 2009 Suffolk County Government Effectively Eliminated ……………………………………………………………………………………………………… Sheriff’s functions transferred to state but cost to Boston will stay the same The Suffolk County Sheriff’s Department, the County government has historically been last active component of Suffolk County weaker in Massachusetts than in other states. government, will be transferred to state Of the 14 counties in Massachusetts, 7 were control as of January 2010 as a result of a new abolished from 1997 to 2000 and their law signed by the Governor in August 2009. functions, including sheriffs’ departments, This act (Ch. 61, Acts of 2009) transfers the were transferred to state control. In addition, sheriffs’ departments in the counties of Suffolk County retained its Sheriff’s Barnstable, Bristol, Dukes, Nantucket, Department but its other functions were Norfolk, Plymouth and Suffolk to the transferred to the state. Commonwealth. Chapter 61 transfers the seven remaining The employees in these seven sheriffs’ county sheriffs’ departments to state control, departments will become state employees and ending the last active operation in Suffolk will join the state Group Insurance County government. The sheriffs of these Commission (GIC). Even with this transfer, counties supported the transfer since state the City of Boston’s budget responsibility for control would provide more stable funding Suffolk County will remain the same as in than available to counties, which rely on FY09 but will not increase. volatile deeds excise receipts for a share of their support. Prior to the transfer, Boston paid a maintenance-of-effort charge as determined The Registry of Deeds and other limited by the state budget process.
    [Show full text]