Boston-Worcester-Providence, MA-RI-NH-CT Combined Statistical Area

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Boston-Worcester-Providence, MA-RI-NH-CT Combined Statistical Area CUMBERLAND ME NH GRAFTON CARROLL Laconia RUTLAND WINDSOR E R Laconia I T BELKNAP H YORK N S P O Laconia M M SULLIVAN A Concord R E H MERRIMACK STRAFFORD V W Concord E Concord N VERMONT NEWYORK Rockingham County- WINDHAM Manchester Strafford County HILLSBOROUGH ROCKINGHAM BENNINGTON CHESHIRE MANCHESTER- NASHUA MANCHESTER- VERMONT NASHUA Cambridge- Atlantic Nashua Ocean MASSACHUSETTS Newton- Framingham BOSTON- CAMBRIDGE- ESSEX KEY FRANKLIN Boston- QUINCY Worcester- 1 Framingham Providence MIDDLESEX 2 Cambridge BERKSHIRE 3 Boston WORCESTER Waltham 2 SUFFOLK HAMPSHIRE WORCESTER Newton 3 Worcester 1 WORCESTER Boston- NORFOLK Boston HAMPDEN Worcester- BOSTON- MASSACHUSETTS Manchester CAMBRIDGE- CONNECTICUT NEWTON HARTFORD TOLLAND PROVIDENCE- Willimantic NEW BEDFORD- PLYMOUTH BARNSTABLE LITCHFIELD Hartford- FALL RIVER TOWN WINDHAM BARNSTABLE West Hartford- Providence BRISTOL Willimantic PROVIDENCE TOWN HARTFORD-WEST Warwick Barnstable BARNSTABLE HARTFORD-EAST KENT Town HARTFORD BRISTOL MA RI NEW PROVIDENCE- MIDDLESEX LONDON WARWICK NEW WASHINGTON NEWPORT HAVEN DUKES NANTUCKET FAIRFIELD UT ECTIC ONN K C YOR NEW LEGEND Boston-Worcester- Providence 2012 Combined Statistical Area BARNSTABLE TOWN 2012 Metropolitan Statistical Area Laconia 2012 Micropolitan Statistical Area Boston 2012 Metropolitan Divisions 0 10 20 30 40Kilometers Waltham 2012 Principal City Boston-Worcester- 0 10 20 30 40Miles Manchester 2007 Combined Statistical Area WORCESTER 2007 Metropolitan Statistical Area Concord 2007 Micropolitan Statistical Area 2012 Combined Statistical Area (CSA) and Metropolitan/Micropolitan CONNECTICUT State or Statistical Equivalent Statistical Area (CBSA) boundaries and names are as of February 2013. TOLLAND County or Statistical Equivalent 2007 Combined Statistical Areas (CSA) and Metropolitan/Micropolitan Statistical Areas (CBSA) are as of December 2006. All other boundaries and names are as of January 2012. U.S. DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE Economics and Statistics Administration U.S. Census Bureau 2012 Economic Census.

Copy Link

Recommended publications

GAO-04-758 Metropolitan Statistical Areas
United States General Accounting Office Report to the Subcommittee on GAO Technology, Information Policy, Intergovernmental Relations and the Census, Committee on Government Reform, House of Representatives June 2004 METROPOLITAN STATISTICAL AREAS New Standards and Their Impact on Selected Federal Programs a GAO-04-758 June 2004 METROPOLITAN STATISTICAL AREAS New Standards and Their Impact on Highlights of GAO-04-758, a report to the Selected Federal Programs Subcommittee on Technology, Information Policy, Intergovernmental Relations and the Census, Committee on Government Reform, House of Representatives For the past 50 years, the federal The new standards for federal statistical recognition of metropolitan areas government has had a metropolitan issued by OMB in 2000 differ from the 1990 standards in many ways. One of the area program designed to provide a most notable differences is the introduction of a new designation for less nationally consistent set of populated areas—micropolitan statistical areas. These are areas comprised of a standards for collecting, tabulating, central county or counties with at least one urban cluster of at least 10,000 but and publishing federal statistics for geographic areas in the United fewer than 50,000 people, plus adjacent outlying counties if commuting criteria States and Puerto Rico. Before is met. each decennial census, the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) The 2000 standards and the latest population update have resulted in five reviews the standards to ensure counties being dropped from metropolitan statistical areas, while another their continued usefulness and 41counties that had been a part of a metropolitan statistical area have had their relevance and, if warranted, revises statistical status changed and are now components of micropolitan statistical them.
[Show full text]
Geography Variables
The 2016 National Survey of Children’s Health reports four geographic variables on the public use file: FIPSST (State of Residence), CBSAFP_YN (Core-Based Statistical Area Status), METRO_YN (Metropolitan Statistical Area Status), and MPC_YN (Metropolitan Principal City Status). The intersection of CBSAFP_YN and METRO_YN allows users to also identify children in Micropolitan Statistical Areas. Core-Based Statistical Areas (CBSAs) are defined as a county or counties with at least one urbanized area or urban cluster (a core) of at least 10,000 population, plus adjacent counties that have a high degree of social and economic integration with the core (as measured through commuting ties). There are two types of CBSAs: Metropolitan Statistical Areas (MSAs) and Micropolitan Statistical Areas (μSAs). The differentiating factor between these types is that MSAs have a larger core, with a population of at least 50,000. A principal city – the largest incorporated place with a population of at least 50,000 – is identified in every MSA. The intersection of FIPSST, CBSAFP_YN, METRO_YN, and MPC_YN allows a user to identify four geographic areas: - Not in a Core-Based Statistical Area (CBSAFP_YN = 2) - Micropolitan Statistical Area (CBSAFP_YN = 1 and METRO_YN = 2) - Metropolitan Statistical Area, not Principal City (METRO_YN = 1 and MPC_YN = 2) - Metropolitan Principal City (MPC_YN = 1) To protect respondent confidentiality, CBSAFP_YN, METRO_YN, and MPC_YN could not be reported for children in some states. If a variable or intersection of variables could be used to identify a geographic area within a state with a child population under 100,000, reported values for that variable were replaced with ".D", indicating "Suppressed for Confidentiality", for all children in that state.
[Show full text]
Boston Produced in 2012
BioMap2 CONSERVING THE BIODIVERSITY OF MASSACHUSETTS IN A CHANGING WORLD Boston Produced in 2012 This report and associated map provide information about important sites for biodiversity conservation in your area. This information is intended for conservation planning, and is not intended for use in state regulations. BioMap2 Conserving the Biodiversity of Massachusetts in a Changing World Table of Contents Introduction What is BioMap2 – Purpose and applications One plan, two components Understanding Core Habitat and its components Understanding Critical Natural Landscape and its components Understanding Core Habitat and Critical Natural Landscape Summaries Sources of Additional Information Boston Overview Core Habitat and Critical Natural Landscape Summaries Elements of BioMap2 Cores Core Habitat Summaries Elements of BioMap2 Critical Natural Landscapes Critical Natural Landscape Summaries Natural Heritage Massachusetts Division of Fisheries and Wildlife 1 Rabbit Hill Road, Westborough, MA 01581 & Endangered phone: 508‐389‐6360 fax: 508‐389‐7890 Species Program For more information on rare species and natural communities, please see our fact sheets online at www.mass.gov/nhesp. BioMap2 Conserving the Biodiversity of Massachusetts in a Changing World Introduction The Massachusetts Department of Fish & Game, through the Division of Fisheries and Wildlife’s Natural Heritage & Endangered Species Program (NHESP), and The Nature Conservancy’s Massachusetts Program developed BioMap2 to protect the state’s biodiversity in the context of climate change. BioMap2 combines NHESP’s 30 years of rigorously documented rare species and natural community data with spatial data identifying wildlife species and habitats that were the focus of the Division of Fisheries and Wildlife’s 2005 State Wildlife Action Plan (SWAP).
[Show full text]
Metropolitan Statistical Areas
Monday, June 28, 2010 Part IV Office of Management and Budget 2010 Standards for Delineating Metropolitan and Micropolitan Statistical Areas; Notice VerDate Mar<15>2010 20:27 Jun 25, 2010 Jkt 220001 PO 00000 Frm 00001 Fmt 4717 Sfmt 4717 E:\FR\FM\28JNN3.SGM 28JNN3 srobinson on DSKHWCL6B1PROD with NOTICES3 37246 Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 123 / Monday, June 28, 2010 / Notices OFFICE OF MANAGEMENT AND Web site at http://www.whitehouse.gov/ nonstatistical activities or for use in BUDGET omb/fedreg_default/. program funding formulas. Furthermore, the Metropolitan and FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 2010 Standards for Delineating Micropolitan Statistical Area Standards Suzann Evinger, Office of Management Metropolitan and Micropolitan do not produce an urban-rural and Budget, telephone number (202) Statistical Areas classification, and confusion of these 395–3093, fax number 202–395–7245. concepts can lead to difficulties in AGENCY: Office of Information and SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: program implementation. Counties Regulatory Affairs, Office of Outline of Notice included in Metropolitan and Management and Budget (OMB), Micropolitan Statistical Areas and many Executive Office of the President. A. Background and Review Process other counties may contain both urban ACTION: Notice of decision. B. Summary of Comments Received in and rural territory and population. For Response to the February 12, 2009 Federal instance, programs that seek to SUMMARY: This Notice announces OMB’s Register Notice adoption of 2010 Standards for C. OMB’s Decisions
[Show full text]
The Geography of Government Geography
Research Note The Geography of Government Geography Old Dominion University Center for Real Estate and Economic Development http://www.odu.edu/creed 1 The Geography of Government Geography In glancing over articles in journals, magazines, or newspapers, the reader quite often encounters terms that make sense within the article’s context, but are seemingly hard to compare with other expressions; a few examples would include phrases such as Metropolitan Statistical Areas, Planning Districts, Labor Market Areas, and, even, Hampton Roads (what or where is that?). Definitions don’t stay static; they occasionally change. For instance, in June 2004 the United States General Accounting Office (GAO) published new standards for Metropolitan Statistical Areas (GAO report, GAO-04-758). To provide some illumination on this topic, the following examines the basic definitions and how they apply to the Hampton Roads region. Terminology, Old and New Let’s review a few basic definitions1: Metropolitan Statistical Area – To be considered a Metropolitan Statistical Area, an area must have at least one urbanized grouping of 50,000 or more people. The phrase “Metropolitan Statistical Area” has been traditionally referred to as “MSA”. The Metropolitan Statistical Area comprises the central county or counties or independent cities containing the core area, as well as adjoining counties. 1 The definitions are derived from several sources included in the “For Further Reading and Reference” section of this article. 2 Micropolitan Statistical Area – This is a relatively new term and was introduced in 2000. A Micropolitan Statistical Area is a locale with a central county or counties or independent cities with, at a minimum, an urban grouping having no less than 10,000 people, but no more than 50,000.
[Show full text]
495/Metrowest Profile Prepared for the 495/Metrowest Suburban Edge Community Commission
495/MetroWest Profile Prepared for the 495/MetroWest Suburban Edge Community Commission 495/MetroWest Suburban Edge Community Commission The 495/ MetroWest Suburban Edge Community Commission was established by the Legislature in Section 233 of Chapter 119 of the Session Laws of 2015. The commission will study development challenges experienced by edge communities, including transportation, water, cellular, and energy infrastructure, transit services, residential development, reuse of former industrial facilities and historic mills, brownfields reclamation, downtown redevelopment and other such constraints. The commission will then develop policy responses and recommendations to ensure that edge communities can participate in state development initiatives and benefit from state resources. The commission will focus its investigation and study on the 35 municipalities served by the 495/MetroWest Corridor Partnership, Inc. and develop a pilot program to address the issues to be studied and investigated by the commission. Our Mission The mission of the Public Policy Center (PPC) at UMass Dartmouth is to: Inform evidence-based policy making. Improve public understanding of critical policy issues. Provide educational and research opportunities to our faculty and students. Connect the resources of the University of Massachusetts to the communities we serve. The PPC's primary goal is to inform public policy discussions by providing policy makers with university quality research, technical assistance, and analytical services designed to help make our state, region, and communities better places to live, work, and do business. We do this by leveraging the substantial skills of our students and faculty partners, and enhancing the connections between the University and the communities it serves. TABLE OF CONTENTS 1.0 The 495/MetroWest Region ............................................................................................................................
[Show full text]
Texas Metropolitan Statistical Areas (MSA), Counties, Principal Cities, and MSA Non-Principal Municipalities with >50,000 Residents
Texas Metropolitan Statistical Areas (MSA), Counties, Principal Cities, and MSA Non-Principal Municipalities with >50,000 Residents MSA Name1 MSA Counties1 MSA Principal City/Cities1 Other MSA Non-Principal Municipalities >50,000 Residents2 Abilene, TX MSA Abilene N/A Amarillo-Borger, TX MSA Armstrong Potter Amarillo Carson Randall N/A Oldham Austin-Round Rock, TX MSA Bastrop Travis Austin Georgetown Caldwell Williamson Round Rock Pflugerville Hays Cedar Park San Marcos Beaumont-Port Arthur, TX MSA Hardin Newton Beaumont Jefferson Orange Port Arthur N/A Brownsville-Harlingen, TX MSA Cameron Brownsville Harlingen N/A College Station-Bryan, TX MSA Brazos Bryan Burleson College Station Robertson N/A Corpus Christi, TX MSA Aransas Corpus Christi Nueces N/A San Patricio Dallas-Fort Worth-Arlington, TX Core Collin Hood Arlington Frisco Based Statistical Area Dallas Johnson Dallas Garland Dallas-Plano-Irving, TX MSA Denton Parker Denton Grand Prairie Fort Worth-Arlington, TX MSA Ellis Somervell Fort Worth Grapevine Hunt Tarrant Irving Lewisville Kaufman Wise Plano Mansfield Rockwall Richardson McKinney Allen Mesquite Carrollton North Richland DeSoto Hills Euless Richardson Flower Mound Rowlett El Paso, TX MSA El Paso El Paso Hudspeth N/A Houston-The Woodlands-Sugar Land, TX Austin Harris Baytown Galveston MSA Brazoria Montgomery Conroe League City Chambers Waller Houston Missouri City Fort Bend Sugar Land Pasadena Galveston The Woodlands Pearland Killeen-Temple, TX MSA Bell Killeen Coryell Temple Lampasas N/A Laredo, TX MSA Webb Laredo N/A Longview,
[Show full text]
LOCALLY COORDINATED TRANSPORTATION PLAN for the Greater Nashua and Milford Region
LOCALLY COORDINATED TRANSPORTATION PLAN For the Greater Nashua and Milford Region Locally Coordinated Transportation Plan For the Greater Nashua and Milford Region 2020-2024 Adopted: April 15, 2020 LOCALLY COORDINATED TRANSPORTATION PLAN For the Greater Nashua and Milford Region ACKNOWLEDGMENTS Community Input Participants Bridges: Domestic & Sexual Violence Support Servicelink City of Nashua Welfare/Human Services Department Souhegan Valley Transportation Collaborative Front Door Agency Southern NH HIV/AIDS Task Force Gentle Car Rides, LLC Southern NH Services Granite State Independent Living St. John Neumann Day Away Harbor Homes, Inc St. Joseph’s Community Services, Inc. Interested Public Toward Independent Living and Learning, Inc. Keystone Hall Town of Amherst Welfare/Human Services Department Milford Taxi Town of Brookline Welfare/Human Services Department Nashua Center Town of Hollis Welfare/Human Services Department Nashua Soup Kitchen & Shelter, Inc. Town of Hudson Welfare/Human Services Department Nashua Transit System Town of Litchfield Welfare/Human Services Department Opportunity Networks Town of Mason Welfare/Human Services Department Partnership for Successful Living Town of Merrimack Welfare/Human Services Department Pelham Senior Center Town of Milford Welfare/Human Services Department PLUS Company, Inc. Town of Pelham Welfare/Human Services Department SHARE Outreach Town of Wilton Welfare/Human Services Department Steering Committee Nashua Regional Planning Commission Steve Genest, Southern New Hampshire Services Jay
[Show full text]
Rhode Island Rapid Rail
RHODE ISLAND RAPID RAIL A Strategy for Economic Growth Concept Paper March 2019 Grow Smart RI Board of Directors Gail E. McCann Wilfrid L. Gates Board Chair Michael S. Hudner Stanley J. Kanter Lloyd Albert Michael F. Ryan William Baldwin Deming E. Sherman Daniel A. Baudouin W. Edward Wood Samuel J. Bradner Kenneth Burnett John Chambers Acknowledgements Sharon D. Conard-Wells Gib Conover Grow Smart RI thanks its pro-bono planning Trudy Coxe and transportation consultants Roger Leaf of Michael A. DeCataldo New York City and Peter Brassard of Dennis DiPrete Newport, RI and New York City for their Maia Farish leadership in concept development, analysis Travis Escobar and research that made this proposal Michael L. Friedman possible. Glenn Gardiner Brian Goldberg Cover images and graphic concepts courtesy Karen Grande of Roger Williams University student intern Dr. William H. Hollinshead Karita N. Lipdo. Jason E. Kelly Xaykham Khamsyvoravong Howard M. Kilguss Purpose Jane S. Long This paper is being submitted to RIPTA and Pat Moran its planning consultants for consideration Jay O'Grady and evaluation as part of Rhode Island’s first- Taino Palermo ever Transit Master Planning process now Donald W. Powers underway. Lucie G. Searle Pamela M. Sherrill Julia Anne M. Slom Grow Smart RI Joseph T. Wanat 1 Empire St, Suite 523 George Watson III Providence, RI 02903 Martha L. Werenfels 401-273-5711 Nancy Parker Wilson www.GrowSmartRI.org Directors Emeritus Arnold "Buff" Chace Louise Durfee, Esq. Grow Smart RI 1 Table of Contents Introduction .......................................................................................................... 2 Rethinking mobility in RI ..................................................................................... 2 Rhode Island Rapid Rail........................................................................................ 3 Better Connecting People with Jobs .................................................................
[Show full text]
Rhode Island - Massachusettsme Area NH VT
The Selected Alternative: Connecticut - Rhode Island - MassachusettsME Area NH VT Albany MA Worcester Boston The Federal Railroad Administration (FRA) sponsored NY Today’s Springﬁeld the NEC FUTURE program to create a comprehensive Hartford Northeast RI Providence plan for improving the Northeast Corridor (NEC) CT Corridor New London from Washington, D.C., to Boston, MA. Through NEC Bridgeport New London/Mystic FUTURE, the FRA has worked closely with NEC states, Stamford New Haven railroads, stakeholders, and the public to define a Newark common vision for the corridor’s future. NJ 457 Miles PA New York OF TRACK TOOK NEARLY A Harrisburg CENTURY TO BUILD Trenton Selecting the Grow Vision Philadelphia Wilmington 750,000+ The Selected Alternative provides the level of service WV MD NJ Daily Passengers Baltimore necessary to grow the role of rail in the regional MAKES THIS THE BUSIEST RAIL CORRIDOR IN THE NATION transportation system. The Selected Alternative DE Washington, D.C. will improve the reliability, capacity, connectivity, performance, and resiliency of passenger rail services 7 Million Jobs WITHIN 5 MILES OF NEC STATIONS on the NEC to meet future Northeast mobility needs VA for 2040 and beyond. Richmond Existing NEC Relative number of daily passengers Commercial area around stations Area Benefits The Selected Alternative brings the NEC to a state of good repair, eliminates chokepoints that delay trains, IMPROVE RAIL SERVICE and supports significant growth in service, including: Corridor-wide service and performance objectives for frequency, travel time, design speed, and passenger convenience. A new Regional rail station in Pawtucket, RI ୭ improves connectivity to the NEC in northeast MODERNIZE NEC INFRASTRUCTURE Rhode Island Corridor-wide repair, replacement, and rehabilitation of the existing NEC Boston South Station expansion, consistent to bring the corridor into a state of good repair and increase reliability.
[Show full text]
OMB Bulletin No. 20-01 Appendix
EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT OFFICE OF MANAGEMENT AND BUDGET WASHINGTON, D.C. 20503 March 6, 2020 0MB BULLETIN NO. 20-01 TO THE HEADS OF EXECUTIVE DEPARTMENTS AND ESTABLISHMENTS SUBJECT: Revised Delineations of Metropolitan Statistical Areas, Micropolitan Statistical Areas, and Combined Statistical Areas, and Guidance on Uses of the Delineations of These Areas 1. Purpose: This Bulletin and its Appendix ("the Bulletin") establish revised delineations for the Nation's Metropolitan Statistical Areas, Micropolitan Statistical Areas, and Combined Statistical Areas. The Bulletin also provides delineations of Metropolitan Divisions as well as delineations of New England City and Town Areas. This Bulletin and updates and supersedes 0MB Bulletin No. 18-04, issued on September 14, 2018. The Attachment to the Bulletin, "Updates to Statistical Areas," provides detailed information on the update of statistical areas since that time. The delineations of the statistical areas shown in the Appendix's nine lists take effect immediately. These delineations reflect the Standards for Delineating Metropolitan and Micropolitan Statistical Areas that the Office of Management and Budget (0MB) published on June 28, 2010, (75 FR 37246) and the application of those standards to Census Bureau population and journey-to-work data. The Bulletin also provides guidance on the use of the delineations of these statistical areas. 2. Background: Pursuant to 44 U.S.C. § 3504(e)(3), 31 U.S.C. § 1104(d), and Executive Order No. 10,253 (June 11, 1951), 0MB delineates Metropolitan Statistical Areas, Metropolitan Divisions, Micropolitan Statistical Areas, Combined Statistical Areas, and New England City and Town Areas for use in Federal statistical activities.
[Show full text]
2021 Income Limits Borrowers Whose Total Household Income Does Not Exceed 100% of Area Median Income May Qualify for the ONE Mortgage Program
2021 Income Limits Borrowers whose total household income does not exceed 100% of area median income may qualify for the ONE Mortgage Program. Borrowers below 80% area median income may be eligible for MHP subsidy. Barnstable County Barnstable (includes: Centerville, Cotuit, Hyannis, Marstons Mills, Osterville, West Barnstable), Bourne, Brewster, Chatham, Dennis, Eastham, Falmouth, Harwich, Mashpee, Orleans, Provincetown, Sandwich, Truro, Wellfleet, Yarmouth Household Size 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 80% Income Limit $54,450 $62,200 $70,000 $77,750 $84,000 $90,200 $96,450 $102,650 100% Income Limit $68,100 $77,750 $87,500 $97,200 $105,000 $112,750 $120,600 $128,350 Berkshire County Alford, Becket, Clarksburg, Egremont, Florida, Great Barrington, Hancock, Monterey, Mount Washington, New Ashford, New Marlborough, North Adams, Otis, Peru, Sandisfield, Savoy, Sheffield, Tyringham, Washington, West Stockbridge, Williamstown, Windsor Household Size 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 80% Income Limit $49,700 $56,800 $63,900 $70,950 $76,650 $82,350 $88,000 $93,700 100% Income Limit $62,150 $71,000 $79,900 $88,700 $95,850 $102,950 $110,000 $117,150 Adams, Cheshire, Dalton, Hinsdale, Lanesborough, Lee, Lenox, Pittsfield, Richmond, Stockbridge Household Size 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 80% Income Limit $50,900 $58,200 $65,450 $72,700 $78,550 $84,350 $90,150 $96,000 100% Income Limit $63,650 $72,750 $81,850 $90,900 $98,200 $105,450 $112,700 $120,000 Bristol County Easton, Raynham Household Size 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 80% Income Limit $71,300 $81,500 $91,700 $101,850 $110,000 $118,150 $126,300 $134,450
[Show full text]