Abstracts from session A Induced polarization and pore radius – a discussion Andreas Weller Zeyu Zhang Lee Slater Institut für Geophysik, TU Clausthal Southwest Petroleum University Rutgers University Arnold-Sommerfeld-Str.1, Institute of Earth Science and Technology Dpt. Earth and Environm. Sci. 38678 Clausthal-Zellerfeld, Germany Chengdu, China Newark, New Jersey, USA
[email protected] [email protected] [email protected] Sabine Kruschwitz Matthias Halisch Bundesanstalt für Materialforschung und –prüfung Leibniz-Institut für Angewandte Geophysik Unter den Eichen 87, 12205 Berlin, Germany Stilleweg 1, 30655 Hannover, Germany
[email protected] [email protected] another useful method that can be used to estimate the pore size distribution. MICP is a laboratory method. Under SUMMARY favourable conditions, NMR is also applicable in field surveys. Permeability estimation from spectral induced Induced Polarization (IP) has been proposed to be another polarization (SIP) measurements is based on a potential method providing access to the pore size fundamental premise that the characteristic relaxation distribution. Several authors observed relations between the τ time ( ) is related to the effective hydraulic radius ( reff ) pore size and different types of relaxation times (e.g. Scott and controlling fluid flow. The approach requires a reliable Barker, 2003; Binley et al., 2005; Kruschwitz et al. 2010). It is estimate of the diffusion coefficient of the ions in the difficult to explain all these observations by a uniform electrical double layer. Others have assumed a value for physical model. Instead of a pore size distribution, a so-called the diffusion coefficient, or postulated different values for characteristic pore size is assumed.