DOCSLIB.ORG

Fig. S1. Frequency Distributions for Nobel Laureates and Non-Nobel

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Fig. S1. Frequency Distributions for Nobel Laureates and Non-Nobel Non−Nobel Nobel Non−Nobel Nobel 1000 1000 Number of Individuals Number of Individuals 10 10 0 50 100 0 20 40 60 0 2 4 6 8 0 2 4 6 Number of Ancestors Number of Nobel laureate Ancestors Non−Nobel Nobel Non−Nobel Nobel 1000 1000 Number of Individuals Number of Individuals 10 10 0 5000 10000 0 1000 2000 0 20 40 60 0 5 10 15 20 Number of Descendants Number of Nobel laureate Descendants Non−Nobel Nobel Non−Nobel Nobel 1000 1000 Number of Individuals Number of Individuals 10 10 0 50 100 150 0 50 100 150 200 0 2 4 6 8 0 2 4 6 8 Number of M/GM Number of Nobel laureate M/GM Non−Nobel Nobel Non−Nobel Nobel 1000 1000 Number of Individuals Number of Individuals 10 10 0 100 200 300 400 0 200 400 0 5 10 15 0 5 10 15 Number of Local Academic Family Number of Nobel laureate Local Academic Family Non-Nobel Nobel 1000 Number of Individuals 10 0.00 0.25 0.50 0.75 1.00 0.00 0.25 0.50 0.75 1.00 Heterogeneity Score Fig. S1. Frequency distributions for Nobel laureates and non-Nobel laureates for number of ancestors, Nobel laureate ancestors, descendants, Nobel laureate descendants, mentees/grandmentees (M/GM), Nobel laureate M/GM, local academic family, Nobel laureate local academic family, and heterogeneity. The Y axis is on a log scale. 50 300 300 Observed: -0.846 Observed: 0.497 Observed: 0.023 45 Adj. P Value: 0.073 Adj. P Value: 0.003 Adj. P Value: 0.389 250 250 s s 40 s l l l a a a i i i r r 35 r T T T 200 200 m m m o o 30 o d d d n n n a a 25 a 150 150 R R R f f f o o o 20 r r r e e e b b 15 b 100 100 m m m u u u N N 10 N 50 50 5 0 0 0 3 1 9 7 5 3 1 9 7 5 3 1 9 7 5 3 1 9 7 5 3 1 1 3 5 . 4 4 3 3 3 3 3 2 2 2 2 2 1 1 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -0.7 -0.6 -0.5 -0.4 -0.3 -0.2 -0.1 0.0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.7 0.8 -0.04 -0.03 -0.02 -0.01 0 0.01 0.02 0.03 0.04 0.05 0.06 0.07 Intercept (Nobel Ancestors) Nobel Status Coefficients (Nobel Ancestors) Ancestors Coefficient (Nobel Ancestors) 350 Observed: -1.049 180 Observed: 1.033 250 Observed: 0.002 Adj. P Value: 0.85 Adj. P Value: 0 Adj. P Value: 0.143 160 300 s l 200 a s s i l l 140 r a a i i T r 250 r T T m 120 o 150 m m d o o n d d 200 100 a n n R a a f R R o 100 f f 80 150 r o o e r r b e e m b b 60 u m 100 m 50 N u u N N 40 50 20 0 0 0 -2.4-2.3-2.2-2.1 -2 -1.9-1.8-1.7-1.6-1.5-1.4-1.3-1.2-1.1 -1 -0.9-0.8-0.7-0.6-0.5 -1.1 -1 -0.9 -0.8 -0.7 -0.6 -0.5 -0.4 -0.3 -0.2 -0.1 0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.7 Intercept (Nobel Descendants) Nobel Status Coefficient (Nobel Descendants) Descendants Coefficients (Nobel Descendants) 45 120 140 Observed: -5.205 Observed: 2.354 Observed: 0.164 40 Adj. P Value: 1 Adj. P Value: 0 Adj. P Value: 0 120 100 s s s l l l a a a 35 i i i r r r 100 T T T 30 80 m m m o o o d d d 80 25 n n n a a a 60 R R R f f f 20 60 o o o r r r e e e 15 40 b b b 40 m m m u u u 10 N N N 20 20 5 0 0 0 3 4 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 1 8 5 2 1 8 2 6 4 8 2 6 4 8 2 6 4 8 2 8 2 6 4 1 5 1 7 3 9 5 1 7 3 9 5 1 7 3 9 5 1 7 3 9 5 1 7 4 . - - - 0 0 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 4 1 3 3 2 2 1 1 1 0 0 9 9 9 8 8 7 7 7 6 6 5 5 5 4 . 9 9 8 7 6 6 5 4 3 3 2 1 0 0 2 2 1 0 . 0 - 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 0 0 . 1 1 1 1 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 - - - - 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Intercept (Nobel Mentees/Grandmentees) Nobel Status Coefficient (Nobel Mentees/Grandmentees) Mentees/Grandmentees Coefficient (Nobel Mentees/Grandmentees) 120 250 400 Observed: -1.714 Observed: 1.86 Observed: 0.014 Adj. P Value: 0 Adj. P Value: 0 350 Adj. P Value: 0.964 100 s s 200 s l l l a a a i i i 300 r r r T T T 80 m m m 250 o o 150 o d d d n n n a a 60 a 200 R R R f f f o o o 100 r r r 150 e e e b b 40 b m m m u u u 100 N N 50 N 20 50 0 0 0 -2.34 -2.32 -2.3 -2.28 -2.26 -2.24 -2.22 -2.2 -2.18 -2.16 -2.14 -2.12 -2.1 -2.08 -0.5 -0.4 -0.3 -0.2 -0.1 0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.013 0.014 0.015 0.016 0.017 0.018 0.019 0.02 Intercept (Local Nobel Family) Nobel Status Coefficient (Local Nobel Family) Local Academic Family Coefficient (Local Nobel Family) 450 200 80 Observed: -1.70203 Observed: 0.27328 Observed: 0.07233 Adj. P Value: 1 Adj. P Value: 0.347 180 Adj. P Value: 177 70 400 s s s l l 160 l 350 a a a i i i 60 r r r T T 140 T 300 m m m 50 o o o 120 d d d n 250 n n a a a 40 100 R R R f f f 200 o o o 80 r r r 30 e e e b b b 150 60 m m m u u u 20 N N N 100 40 10 50 20 0 0 0 -0.8-0.6-0.4-0.2 0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1 1.2 1.4 1.6 1.8 2 2.2 2.4 2.6 2.8 3 3.2 -14 -12 -10 -8 -6 -4 -2 0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 -1 -0.9 -0.8 -0.7 -0.6 -0.5 -0.4 -0.3 -0.2 -0.1 0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6 Intercept (Heterogeneity) Nobel Status Coefficient (Heterogeneity) Local Nobel Laureate Family Coefficient (Heterogeneity) Fig. S2. Frequency distributions for the random intercept, the random Nobel status coeffiecient, and the random family size coefficient generated from 1000 random permutations of Nobel status for number of Nobel ancestors (row 1), number of Nobel descendants (row 2), number of Nobel mentees/grandmentees (M/GM, row 3), and number of local Nobel academic family (row 4). Frequency distributions for random intercept, random Nobel status coefficient, and random local Nobel academic family coefficients generated for 1000 permutations of Nobel status for the heterogenetity measure is displayed in row 5. R. Claude George R. Woods Bird Jonathan B Frank Albert Cohen Martin Sage Weinhold Robert L. William P. Donald F. Kuczkowski Reinhardt Hornig Jerome D. Jerome Swalen Karle Edgar Bright Daniel Wilson, Jr. William Kivelson Hughes Miller Robert L. Livingston Robert George W. Isabella L. Karplus Flynn Karle Mario J. George Martin Lawrence O. Molina Raymond Lawrence S. Brockway Karplus Cowgill Harold C. Bartell Dudley R. Bradley Gilbert John D. Philip Henry James Hillhouse Howard Herschbach Baldeschwieler Mitchell Ephraim Henry C. Renwick Alvin P. Boggs Winter Shorr Eckstein Withrow David Powell Kennedy C. Bradley Louis John WilliamBrubaker Lloyd Cadie Edwin Nichols Kurt M. MislowShoemaker Moore Allamandola, William C. John FrazerClarence Clarence Lafayette ThomasDaniels Lassettre Joseph W. Jr. Ebaugh Gary George E. Rose Benedict William Balke Potter Stanley R. David Harker Felsenfeld James D.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • GERALDINE L. RICHMOND Website
    1 GERALDINE L. RICHMOND Website: http://RichmondScience.uoregon.edu Address: 1253 University of Oregon, Eugene, OR 97403 Phone: (541) 346-4635 Email: [email protected] Fax: (541) 346-5859 EDUCATION 1976—1980 Ph.D. Chemistry, University of California, Berkeley, Advisor: George C. Pimentel 1971—1975 B.S. Chemistry, Kansas State University EMPLOYMENT 2013- Presidential Chair of Science and Professor of Chemistry, University of Oregon Research Interests: Understanding the molecular structure and dynamics of interfacial processes that have relevance to environmental remediation, biomolecular assembly, atmospheric chemistry and alternative energy sources. Teaching Interests: Science literacy for nonscientists; career development courses for emerging and career scientists and engineers in the US and developing countries. 2001-2013 Richard M. and Patricia H. Noyes Professor of Chemistry, University of Oregon 1998-2001 Knight Professor of Liberal Arts and Sciences, University of Oregon 1991- Professor of Chemistry, University of Oregon 1991-1995 Director, Chemical Physics Institute, University of Oregon 1985-l991 Associate Professor of Chemistry, University of Oregon 1980-1985 Assistant Professor of Chemistry, Bryn Mawr College AWARDS AND HONORS 2019 Linus Pauling Legacy Award, Oregon State University 2018 Linus Pauling Medal Award 2018 Priestley Medal, American Chemical Society (ACS) 2018 MHS Wall of Fame, Manhattan High School, Manhattan, Kansas 2018/19 Visiting Fellow, Chemical Institute of Technology, Mumbai, India 2017 Howard Vollum Award for Distinguished Achievement in Science and Technology, Reed College 2017 Honorary Doctorate Degree, Kansas State University 2017 Honorary Doctorate Degree, Illinois Institute of Technology 2016- Secretary, American Academy of Arts and Sciences; Member of the Board, Council and Trust 2015 U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • Edward M. Eyring
    The Chemistry Department 1946-2000 Written by: Edward M. Eyring Assisted by: April K. Heiselt & Kelly Erickson Henry Eyring and the Birth of a Graduate Program In January 1946, Dr. A. Ray Olpin, a physicist, took command of the University of Utah. He recruited a number of senior people to his administration who also became faculty members in various academic departments. Two of these administrators were chemists: Henry Eyring, a professor at Princeton University, and Carl J. Christensen, a research scientist at Bell Laboratories. In the year 2000, the Chemistry Department attempts to hire a distinguished senior faculty member by inviting him or her to teach a short course for several weeks as a visiting professor. The distinguished visitor gets the opportunity to become acquainted with the department and some of the aspects of Utah (skiing, national parks, geodes, etc.) and the faculty discover whether the visitor is someone they can live with. The hiring of Henry Eyring did not fit this mold because he was sought first and foremost to beef up the graduate program for the entire University rather than just to be a faculty member in the Chemistry Department. Had the Chemistry Department refused to accept Henry Eyring as a full professor, he probably would have been accepted by the Metallurgy Department, where he had a courtesy faculty appointment for many years. Sometime in early 1946, President Olpin visited Princeton, NJ, and offered Henry a position as the Dean of the Graduate School at the University of Utah. Henry was in his scientific heyday having published two influential textbooks (Samuel Glasstone, Keith J.
    [Show full text]
  • Alumni Newsletter
    ALUMNI NEWSLETTER SCHOOL OF CHEMICAL SCIENCES UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS at Urbana-Champaign NO. 11, WINTER 1976-77 The State of the Union (Comments by H. S. Gutowsky, director of the School of Chemical Sciences) Following the tradition of the last three issues of the Alumni Newsletter, I have put together a synopsis of some selected material that appears in much more detail in the 1975-76 Annual Report of the School of Chemical Sci­ ences and is not covered elsewhere in this issue. If you would like more details, let me know and I will be happy to forward you a copy of the com­ plete annual report. Instructional Program Two steps were taken dw·ing the past year to address the fact that 75 per­ cent or more of our chemistry graduates take positions in industry without learning much in their programs about the nature of industrial careers. Professor Peter Beak organized a special topics course, Chemistry 433, Re­ search in Industry, given in the fall semester. Early in the course, Dr. J. K. Stille from the University of Iowa presented a series of ten lectures on the fundamentals of industrial and polymer chemistry. This was followed by eleven weekly lectures from industrial speakers active in chemical roles. The program attracted a good deal of interest among our students and staff and its beneficial effects were visible to industrial recruiters interviewing here near its end. The second step was the inauguration of a cooperative program with Monsanto Company (St. Louis) for the summer employment of graduate students. Three entering graduate students participated in the summer of 1976, and it is hoped to extend the program to a larger number of students (and other companies) as well as to faculty next summer.
    [Show full text]
  • William Albert Noyes
    NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES WILLIAM ALBERT NOYES 1857—1941 A Biographical Memoir by ROGER ADAMS Any opinions expressed in this memoir are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of the National Academy of Sciences. Biographical Memoir COPYRIGHT 1952 NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES WASHINGTON D.C. WILLIAM ALBERT NOYES1 BY ROGER ADAMS William Albert Noyes was born November 6, 1857 on a farm near Independence, Iowa. He was the seventh generation of the Noyes family in America, being descended from Nicholas Noyes who came with his elder brother, James, from Choulder- ton, Wiltshire, in 1633. Their father had been a clergyman but had died before the sons left England. The two brothers settled first in Medford, Massachusetts but in 1655 moved to Newbury. Samuel, of the third generation in this direct line, moved to Abington about 1713 and there he and the succeeding generations lived for over one hundred and forty years. Spencer W. Noyes, the great grandson of Samuel, was ad- mitted as a student to Phillips Academy at Andover, Massachu- setts, March 21, 1837. He married Mary Packard-related to the famous family of shoe manufacturers-and they had three children when they left: Abington and migrated to Iowa in 185j. When the father with his family went west to open up a home- stead, he found conditions typical of the prairies and life was necessarily primitive. In the east he had been a cobbler by trade so had had little experience working the land. The early years were difficult ones because of the hard work in establishing a farm home, getting land into cultivation, raising food and storing sufficient for winter needs.
    [Show full text]
  • A Selected Bibliography of Publications By, and About, J
    A Selected Bibliography of Publications by, and about, J. Robert Oppenheimer Nelson H. F. Beebe University of Utah Department of Mathematics, 110 LCB 155 S 1400 E RM 233 Salt Lake City, UT 84112-0090 USA Tel: +1 801 581 5254 FAX: +1 801 581 4148 E-mail: [email protected], [email protected], [email protected] (Internet) WWW URL: http://www.math.utah.edu/~beebe/ 17 March 2021 Version 1.47 Title word cross-reference $1 [Duf46]. $12.95 [Edg91]. $13.50 [Tho03]. $14.00 [Hug07]. $15.95 [Hen81]. $16.00 [RS06]. $16.95 [RS06]. $17.50 [Hen81]. $2.50 [Opp28g]. $20.00 [Hen81, Jor80]. $24.95 [Fra01]. $25.00 [Ger06]. $26.95 [Wol05]. $27.95 [Ger06]. $29.95 [Goo09]. $30.00 [Kev03, Kle07]. $32.50 [Edg91]. $35 [Wol05]. $35.00 [Bed06]. $37.50 [Hug09, Pol07, Dys13]. $39.50 [Edg91]. $39.95 [Bad95]. $8.95 [Edg91]. α [Opp27a, Rut27]. γ [LO34]. -particles [Opp27a]. -rays [Rut27]. -Teilchen [Opp27a]. 0-226-79845-3 [Guy07, Hug09]. 0-8014-8661-0 [Tho03]. 0-8047-1713-3 [Edg91]. 0-8047-1714-1 [Edg91]. 0-8047-1721-4 [Edg91]. 0-8047-1722-2 [Edg91]. 0-9672617-3-2 [Bro06, Hug07]. 1 [Opp57f]. 109 [Con05, Mur05, Nas07, Sap05a, Wol05, Kru07]. 112 [FW07]. 1 2 14.99/$25.00 [Ber04a]. 16 [GHK+96]. 1890-1960 [McG02]. 1911 [Meh75]. 1945 [GHK+96, Gow81, Haw61, Bad95, Gol95a, Hew66, She82, HBP94]. 1945-47 [Hew66]. 1950 [Ano50]. 1954 [Ano01b, GM54, SZC54]. 1960s [Sch08a]. 1963 [Kuh63]. 1967 [Bet67a, Bet97, Pun67, RB67]. 1976 [Sag79a, Sag79b]. 1981 [Ano81]. 20 [Goe88]. 2005 [Dre07]. 20th [Opp65a, Anoxx, Kai02].
    [Show full text]
  • James A. Mccloskey, Jr
    CHEMICAL HERITAGE FOUNDATION JAMES A. MCCLOSKEY, JR. Transcript of Interviews Conducted by Michael A. Grayson at the McCloskeys’ Home Helotes, Texas on 19 and 20 March 2012 (With Subsequent Corrections and Additions) James A. McCloskey, Jr. ACKNOWLEDGMENT This oral history is one in a series initiated by the Chemical Heritage Foundation on behalf of the American Society for Mass Spectrometry. The series documents the personal perspectives of individuals related to the advancement of mass spectrometric instrumentation, and records the human dimensions of the growth of mass spectrometry in academic, industrial, and governmental laboratories during the twentieth century. This project is made possible through the generous support of the American Society for Mass Spectrometry. This oral history is designated Free Access. Please note: Users citing this interview for purposes of publication are obliged under the terms of the Chemical Heritage Foundation (CHF) Center for Oral History to credit CHF using the format below: James A. McCloskey, Jr., interview by Michael A. Grayson at the McCloskeys’ home, Helotes, Texas, 19-20 March 2012 (Philadelphia: Chemical Heritage Foundation, Oral History Transcript # 0702). Chemical Heritage Foundation Center for Oral History 315 Chestnut Street Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19106 The Chemical Heritage Foundation (CHF) serves the community of the chemical and molecular sciences, and the wider public, by treasuring the past, educating the present, and inspiring the future. CHF maintains a world-class collection of materials that document the history and heritage of the chemical and molecular sciences, technologies, and industries; encourages research in CHF collections; and carries out a program of outreach and interpretation in order to advance an understanding of the role of the chemical and molecular sciences, technologies, and industries in shaping society.
    [Show full text]
  • Ewald's Sphere/Problem
    Ewald's Sphere/Problem 3.7 Studentproject/Molecular and Solid-State Physics Lisa Marx 0831292 15.01.2011, Graz Ewald's Sphere/Problem 3.7 Lisa Marx 0831292 Inhaltsverzeichnis 1 General Information 3 1.1 Ewald Sphere of Diffraction . 3 1.2 Ewald Construction . 4 2 Problem 3.7 / Ewald's sphere 5 2.1 Problem declaration . 5 2.2 Solution of Problem 3.7 . 5 2.3 Ewald Construction . 6 3 C++-Anhang 8 3.1 Quellcode . 8 3.2 Output-window . 9 Seite 2 Ewald's Sphere/Problem 3.7 Lisa Marx 0831292 1 General Information 1.1 Ewald Sphere of Diffraction Diffraction, which mathematically corresponds to a Fourier transform, results in spots (reflections) at well-defined positions. Each set of parallel lattice planes is represented by spots which have a distance of 1/d (d: interplanar spacing) from the origin and which are perpendicular to the reflecting set of lattice plane. The two basic lattice planes (blue lines) of the two-dimensional rectangular lattice shown below are transformed into two sets of spots (blue). The diagonals of the basic lattice (green lines) have a smaller interplanar distance and therefore cause spots that are farther away from the origin than those of the basic lattice. The complete set of all possible reflections of a crystal constitutes its reciprocal lattice. The diffraction event can be described in reciprocal space by the Ewald sphere construction (figure 1 below). A sphere with radius λ is drawn through the origin of the reciprocal lattice. Now, for each reciprocal lattice point that is located on the Ewald sphere of reflection, the Bragg condition is satisfied and diffraction arises.
    [Show full text]
  • ROBERT SERBER March 14, 1909–June 1, 1997
    NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES ROBE R T S E R BE R 1 9 0 9 — 1 9 9 7 A Biographical Memoir by ROBE R T P . Cr E A S E Any opinions expressed in this memoir are those of the author and do not necessarily reflect the views of the National Academy of Sciences. Biographical Memoir COPYRIGHT 2008 NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES WASHINGTON, D.C. AIP Emilio Segre Visual Archives ROBERT SERBER March 14, 1909–June 1, 1997 BY ROBE RT P . CREASE OBERT SERBER (elected to the NAS in 1952) was one of Rthe leading theorists during the golden age of U.S. physics. He entered graduate school in 190 before such key discoveries as the neutron, positron, and deuteron and prior to the development of the principal tool of nuclear and high-energy physics, the particle accelerator. He retired from the Columbia University Physics Department (as its chairman) in 1978 after completion of the standard model of elementary particle physics, which comprises almost all known particles and forces in a single package, and which has proven hard to surpass. Shy and unostentatious, Serber did not mind being the detached spectator, and did not care when he was occasionally out of step with the mainstream, whether in politics or phys- ics. Nevertheless, others regularly counted on him for advice: he was an insider among insiders. He seemed to carry the entire field of physics in his head, and his particular strength was a synthetic ability. He could integrate all that was known of an area of physics and articulate it back to others clearly and consistently, explaining the connection of each part to the rest.
    [Show full text]
  • The Great-Grandmother of LUCA (Last Universal Common Ancestor)
    Preprints (www.preprints.org) | NOT PEER-REVIEWED | Posted: 4 June 2018 doi:10.20944/preprints201806.0035.v1 Be introduced to the First Universal Common Ancestor (FUCA): the great-grandmother of LUCA (Last Universal Common Ancestor) Francisco Prosdocimi1*, Marco V José2 and Sávio Torres de Farias3* 1 Laboratório de Biologia Teórica e de Sistemas, Instituto de Bioquímica Médica Leopoldo de Meis, Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro, Brasil. 2 Theoretical Biology Group, Instituto de Investigaciones Biomédicas, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, Ciudad Universitaria, 04510 CDMX, Mexico. 3 Laboratório de Genética Evolutiva Paulo Leminsk, Departamento de Biologia Molecular, Universidade Federal da Paraíba, João Pessoa, Paraíba, Brasil. * Correspondence: [email protected]; [email protected] Abstract The existence of a common ancestor to all living organisms in Earth is a necessary corollary of Darwin idea of common ancestry. The Last Universal Common Ancestor (LUCA) has been normally considered as the ancestor of cellular organisms that originated the three domains of life: Bacteria, Archaea and Eukarya. Recent studies about the nature of LUCA indicate that this first organism should present hundreds of genes and a complex metabolism. Trying to bring another of Darwin ideas into the origins of life discussion, we went back into the prebiotic chemistry trying to understand how LUCA could be originated 1 © 2018 by the author(s). Distributed under a Creative Commons CC BY license. Preprints (www.preprints.org) | NOT PEER-REVIEWED | Posted: 4 June 2018 doi:10.20944/preprints201806.0035.v1 under gradualist assumptions. Along this line of reasoning, it became clear to us that the definition of another ancestral should be of particular relevance to the understanding about the emergence of biological systems.
    [Show full text]
  • Beyond the Big Bang • the Amazon's Lost Civilizations • the Truth
    SFI Bulletin winter 2006, vol. 21 #1 Beyond the Big Bang • The Amazon’s Lost Civilizations • The Truth Behind Lying The Bulletin of the Santa Fe Institute is published by SFI to keep its friends and supporters informed about its work. The Santa Fe Institute is a private, independent, multidiscipli- nary research and education center founded in 1984. Since its founding, SFI has devoted itself to creating a new kind of sci- entific research community, pursuing emerging synthesis in science. Operating as a visiting institution, SFI seeks to cat- alyze new collaborative, multidisciplinary research; to break down the barriers between the traditional disciplines; to spread its ideas and methodologies to other institutions; and to encourage the practical application of its results. Published by the Santa Fe Institute 1399 Hyde Park Road Santa Fe, New Mexico 87501, USA phone (505) 984-8800 fax (505) 982-0565 home page: http://www.santafe.edu Note: The SFI Bulletin may be read at the website: www.santafe.edu/sfi/publications/Bulletin/. If you would prefer to read the Bulletin on your computer rather than receive a printed version, contact Patrisia Brunello at 505/984-8800, Ext. 2700 or [email protected]. EDITORIAL STAFF: Ginger Richardson Lesley S. King Andi Sutherland CONTRIBUTORS: Brooke Harrington Janet Yagoda Shagam Julian Smith Janet Stites James Trefil DESIGN & PRODUCTION: Paula Eastwood PHOTO: ROBERT BUELTEMAN ©2004 BUELTEMAN PHOTO: ROBERT SFI Bulletin Winter 2006 TOCtable of contents 3 A Deceptively Simple Formula 2 How Life Began 3 From
    [Show full text]
  • Melanie S. Sanford
    Melanie S. Sanford Department of Chemistry University of Michigan Ann Arbor, MI 48109 Tel. (734) 615-0451 Fax (734) 647-4865 [email protected] Research Group: http://www.umich.edu/~mssgroup/ EDUCATION: Ph.D., Chemistry June 2001 California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, CA Thesis Title: Synthetic and Mechanistic Investigations of Ruthenium Olefin Metathesis Catalysts B.S.; M.S. cum laude with Distinction in Chemistry June 1996 Yale University, New Haven, CT CURRENT POSITION: University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI Moses Gomberg Distinguished University Professor of Chemistry September 2016 – present Arthur F. Thurnau Professor of Chemistry July 2011 – present PREVIOUS POSITIONS: University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI Moses Gomberg Collegiate Professor of Chemistry January 2012 – Sept 2016 Professor of Chemistry September 2010 – June 2011 Associate Professor of Chemistry May 2007 – August 2010 William R. Roush Assistant Professor of Chemistry October 2006 – May 2007 Assistant Professor of Chemistry July 2003 – October 2006 Princeton University, Princeton, NJ NIH NRSA Postdoctoral Fellow August 2001 – June 2003 Advisor: Professor John T. Groves California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, CA Graduate Student August 1997 – July 2001 Advisor: Professor Robert H. Grubbs Yale University, New Haven, CT Undergraduate Student September 1994 – June 1996 Advisor: Professor Robert H. Crabtree Naval Research Laboratory, Washington, DC Summer Intern Summer 2003, 2004, 2005 Advisor: Dr. David W. Conrad AWARDS: Honorary Doctorate, University of South
    [Show full text]
  • MAY 03 Nucleus Sp-LAST
    DED UN 18 O 98 F yyyy N yyyy Y O T R E I T H C E O yyyyN A E S S S L T A E A C R C I yyyyN S M S E E H C C T N IO A May 2003 Vol. LXXXI, No. 9 yyyyC N • AMERI Monthly Meeting Education Night at B.U. Guy Crosby speaks on Chemistry of Nutrition Election 2003 Election of candidates for 2004 Book Review Quantum Leaps in the Wrong Direction, by C. M. Wynn and A. W. Wiggins Historical Note Edward Frankland’s Crusade for Clean Water in the 19th Century template group. If this were true, then this end, a simple molecular modeling Meeting virtually any ring system which ful- exercise was undertaken to compare filled this requirement would lead to a the differences between our best com- series of potent inhibitors pound and those reported by Merck. Report We selected the 1H-pyrrole ring The simple overlay of these molecules From the April 10, 2003 Esselen system as our starting template to test revealed the presence of a methyl Award Address this hypothesis, primarily because group in the Merck compound in a these could readily be prepared from region of space not occupied by our The Discovery And 1,4-diketones through the classical inhibitors. Development Of Lipitor‚ Paal-Knorr condensation and these 1,4- To determine the importance of (Atorvastatin Calcium) diketones, in turn, were potentially occupying this space, bromine and available possessing a wide variety of chlorines were introduced into the 3- Bruce D.
    [Show full text]