Rwanda 2015, Comprehensive Food Security and Vulnerability Analysis

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Rwanda 2015, Comprehensive Food Security and Vulnerability Analysis Rwanda 2015 | Comprehensive food security and vulnerability analysis Data collected in April – May 2015 Rwanda: Comprehensive Food Security Analysis 2015 (Data collected in April-May 2015) Prepared by Lisa Hjelm, WFP Consultant Edited by Katy Williams/Lorna Moris, WFP Consultant Survey design, data processing, analysis and mapping done by the WFP Rwanda VAM team: Jean- Paul Dushimumuremyi, Lisa Hjelm, Nadia Musaninkindi and Jules Rugwiro M. with technical support from Rogerio Bonifacio (WFP spatial analyst). Members of the technical committee contributed technically throughout the process: Jean Marie Vianney Nyabyenda, Jean Baptiste Habyarimana and Telesphore Ntivuguruzwa of MINAGRI and Juvenal Ntambara of NISR. Simon Dradri, Tobias Flaemig, Jo Jacobsen, Allison Oman, Cyprian Ouma, Aysha Twose and Elliot Vhurumuku of WFP provided additional input and valuable comments on the report. Financial support for this study was provided by the United Kingdom’s Department for International Development (DFID) and the Swiss Agency for Development and Cooperation (SDC), WFP and the Ministry of Agriculture and Animal Resources. Other people who contributed technically to the CFSVA 2015 include: Tarik Kubach of EU, Gaetan Heri of FAO, Sergio Regi, Mahamadou Tanimoune and Rossella Bottone of WFP March 2016 © World Food Programme, VAM Food Security Analysis Cover Photos: © John Paul Sesonga of WFP The 2015 Rwanda CFSVA is available at http://www.wfp.org/food-security, www.statistics.gov.rw United Nations World Food Programme Headquarters: Via C.G. Viola 68, Parco dei Medici, 00148, Rome, Italy. For information about the Food Security Analysis/VAM, contact [email protected] For questions or comments concerning any aspect of the survey and this report please contact: National Institute of Statistics of Rwanda Yusuf Murangwa [email protected] Dominique Habimana [email protected] Juvenal Ntambara [email protected] Ministry of Agriculture and Animal Resources Innocent Musabyimana [email protected] Octave Semwaga [email protected] Jean-Marie Vianney Nyabyenda [email protected] World Food Programme Rwanda Jean-Pierre de Margerie [email protected] Abdurrahim Siddiqui [email protected] Jean-Paul Dushimumuremyi [email protected] World Food Programme Regional Bureau, Nairobi Elliot Vhurumuku [email protected] World Food Programme Rome Arif Husain [email protected] TABLE OF CONTENTS List of figures, tables and maps........................................................................................................ iv Figures ............................................................................................................................................. iv Tables .............................................................................................................................................. vi Maps ............................................................................................................................................... vii Acronyms and abbreviations.............................................................................................................viii Foreword .......................................................................................................................................... x Acknowledgements ........................................................................................................................ xii Key findings ...................................................................................................................................... 2 1. Background ............................................................................................................................... 5 1.1 Macro-economic context ................................................................................................... 6 1.2 Social and development context ........................................................................................ 7 1.3 Poverty levels ..................................................................................................................... 8 1.4 Income equality ................................................................................................................. 8 1.5 Gender ............................................................................................................................... 8 1.6 Government development polices ..................................................................................... 8 1.6.1 Vision 2020 ................................................................................................................. 8 1.6.2 Economic Development and Poverty Reduction Strategies (EDPRS 1 and 2) ................ 9 1.7 Food security trends......................................................................................................... 10 2. Rationale and objectives ......................................................................................................... 11 3. Methodology .......................................................................................................................... 12 3.1 The food security and nutritional conceptual framework ................................................. 12 3.2 Food security concepts ..................................................................................................... 13 3.2.1 Food security ............................................................................................................ 13 3.2.2 Nutritional status and nutritional security ................................................................ 13 3.3 Primary data collection .................................................................................................... 13 3.3.1 Food security indicators............................................................................................ 14 3.4 Secondary data collection ................................................................................................ 16 3.5 Study limitations .............................................................................................................. 16 3.5.1 Sample sizes ............................................................................................................. 16 3.5.2 Comparison with previous CFSVA surveys ................................................................. 16 4. Food availability, markets and production .............................................................................. 17 4.1 Domestic food production ................................................................................................ 17 4.2 Food stocks ...................................................................................................................... 20 4.3 Market environment and trade ........................................................................................ 20 i 4.3.1 Import/exports ......................................................................................................... 20 4.4 Market access, market dependence and purchasing behaviour of households ................. 22 4.4.1 Household market participation ............................................................................... 22 4.4.2 Physical access to market ......................................................................................... 25 4.4.3 Household Food access issues .................................................................................. 26 4.4.1 Terms of trade .......................................................................................................... 27 4.5 Market performance ........................................................................................................ 27 4.5.1 General trade flows .................................................................................................. 27 4.5.2 CPI/Inflation ............................................................................................................. 29 4.5.3 Price trends and seasonality analysis ........................................................................ 29 4.5.4 Price anomalies ........................................................................................................ 31 4.5.5 Market integration analysis ...................................................................................... 31 5. The state of food security in Rwanda ...................................................................................... 33 5.1 Household food security .................................................................................................. 33 5.1.1 Food consumption .................................................................................................... 38 5.1.2 Household dietary diversity ...................................................................................... 40 5.1.3 Nutritional value of food items consumed ................................................................ 41 5.2 Food security based on the Food Consumption Score ....................................................... 44 6. Who are the food insecure? .................................................................................................... 46 6.1 Household demographics ................................................................................................. 46 6.2 Characteristics of household head ...................................................................................
Recommended publications
  • Republic of Rwanda Ministry of Education P.O.Box 622
    REPUBLIC OF RWANDA MINISTRY OF EDUCATION P.O.BOX 622 KIGALI Rwanda Report on Variable Tranche linked to two Indicators: 1.Equity Indicator: Pre-Primary Gross Enrolment Rate (GER) increased from an average of 10% in 2014 to 17% by 2017 in the 22 poorest performing districts (defined as those that had GER of less than 17% in 2014). $2.52million will be disbursed once the report demonstrating meeting the target is submitted in October 2017 2. Efficiency: Education Statistics 2016, disaggregated at district level, available. $2.52million will be disbursed once the report demonstrating meeting the target is submitted in October 2017 October 2017 Table of Contents Introduction ................................................................................................................................ 3 SECTION 1: EQUITY INDICATOR: PRE-PRIMARY GROSS ENROLMENT RATE (GER) IN 22 POOREST PERFORMING DISTRICTS ............................................................ 3 Table 1. Pre-Primary Enrolment in 2016 and 2017 (All Distrcits) ................................. 3 Table 2. Pre-Primary Gross Enrolement Rate in Rwanda (as per GPE requirement) 5 Table 3. Pre-Primary GER in 2017 in 22 poorest performing districts current status 5 Table 4. Average of GER in Pre-Primary in 8 better performing districts in 2017 ...... 6 Table 5. GER in Pre-Primary Comparison between 2014 and 2017 in 22 Poorest Performing Districts ............................................................................................................ 7 Table 6. Classrooms Rehabilitated
    [Show full text]
  • Rwanda NCA Land Accounts 2018
    RWANDA NATURAL CAPITAL ACCOUNTS - LAND March 2018 The Rwanda Natural Capital Accounts for Land, has been compiled, designed and published by the National Institute of Statistics of Rwanda (NISR) and the Ministry of Environment with assistance from the World Bank and the WAVES Global Partnership. Additional information about the NCA Land 2016 may be obtained from: NISR: KN, 2 Av, 36, PO. Box 6139, Kigali Rwanda; Telephone: +250 252 571 035 Email: [email protected] Ministry of Environment: PO Box 3502, Kigali Rwanda; Telephone +250 788 305 291 Website: www.minirena.gov.rw Ministry of Land and Forest: PO Box 3502, Kigali Rwanda; Telephone +250 788 305 291 Website: www.minilaf.gov.rw Cover image constructed from maps produced by the Regional Centre for Mapping Resources for Development, available from www.rcmrd.org and available on RLMUA Land Use Planning Portal www.rwandalanduse.rnra.rw. Recommended citation: Government of Rwanda (NISR, Ministry of Environment and Ministry of Lands and Forestry), Natural Capital Accounts for Land, March 2018. ii Contents LIST OF TABLES ....................................................................................................................... V LIST OF FIGURES ..................................................................................................................... V ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS ....................................................................................................... VI EXECUTIVE SUMMARY .....................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Toward a Multisystemic Framework for Mental Health, Social Cohesion
    HHr Health and Human Rights Journal Societal Healing in Rwanda: Toward a MultisystemicHHR_final_logo_alone.indd 1 10/19/15 10:53 AM Framework for Mental Health, Social Cohesion, and Sustainable Livelihoods among Survivors and Perpetrators of the Genocide against the Tutsi alexandros lordos, myria Ioannou, eugène rutembesa, stefani christoforou, eleni anastasiou, and thröstur björgvinsson Abstract The genocide against the Tutsi in Rwanda left the country almost completely devastated, with tremendous consequences for mental health, social cohesion, and livelihoods. In the aftermath of such extreme circumstances and human rights violations, societal healing should be conceptualized and approached based on a multisystemic framework that considers these three sectors—mental health, social cohesion, and livelihoods—as well as their interactions. The aims of the present study are twofold: (1) to review evidence on multisystemic healing initiatives already applied in Rwanda using fieldwork notes from interviews and focus groups, alongside relevant scholarly and gray literature, and (2) to propose a Alexandros Lordos, PhD, is a Lecturer in Clinical Psychology at the Department of Psychology of the University of Cyprus and the Special Advisor on Mental Health and Peacebuilding at Interpeace, Geneva, Switzerland. Myria Ioannou, PhD, is a Postdoctoral Researcher in Clinical Psychology at the Department of Psychology of the University of Cyprus, Nicosia, Cyprus. Eugène Rutembesa, PhD, is a Professor of Clinical Psychology at the University of Rwanda, Kigali, Rwanda. Stefani Christoforou, MSc, is a postgraduate student in the Clinical Psychology Doctoral Program at the Department of Psychology of the University of Cyprus, Nicosia, Cyprus. Eleni Anastasiou, MSc, is a postgraduate student in the Clinical Psychology Doctoral Program at the Department of Psychology of the University of Cyprus, Nicosia, Cyprus.
    [Show full text]
  • USAID/Rwanda Gender and Social Inclusion Analysis
    USAID/RWANDA GENDER AND SOCIAL INCLUSION ANALYSIS REPORT AUGUST 2019 Contract No.: AID-OAA-TO-17-00018 August 16, 2019 i This publication was produced for review by the United States Agency for International Development. It was prepared by Banyan Global. This publication was produced for the United States Agency for International Development (USAID), Contract Number AID-OAA-TO-17-00018. It was prepared by Banyan Global under the authorship of Dina Scippa and Mary Alice Bamusiime. Implemented by: am Names. Banyan Global 1120 20th Street NW, Suite 950 Washington, DC 20036 Phone: +1 202-684-9367 Disclaimer: The authors’ views expressed in this publication do not necessarily reflect those of the United States Agency for International Development or the United States government. Recommended Citation: Scippa, Dina and Bamusiime, Mary Alice. USAID/Rwanda Gender and Social Inclusion Analysis Report. Prepared by Banyan Global. 2019. ii USAID/RWANDA GENDER AND SOCIAL- INCLUSION ANALYSIS REPORT 2019 CONTRACT NO.: AID-OAA-TO-17-00018 iii TABLE OF CONTENTS ACRONYMS vi ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS viii EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 1 1. INTRODUCTION 6 1.1 Background 6 1.2 Purpose of the USAID/Rwanda Gender and Social Inclusion Analysis 6 2. METHODOLOGY 8 2.1 Inception Report 8 2.2 Primary Data Collection 8 2.3 Presentation of Preliminary Findings to USAID 9 2.4 Primary Data Analysis and Interpretation and Report Preparation 9 2.5 Protection of Informant Information 9 2.6 Limitations of the Gender and Social Inclusion Analysis 10 3. RWANDA COUNTRY CONTEXT AND BACKGROUND 11 3.1 Country Context and Background 11 4. GENDER AND SOCIAL INCLUSION ANALYSIS FINDINGS, BY ADS 205 DOMAIN 13 4.1 Laws, Policies, Regulations, and Institutional Practices 13 4.2 Cultural Norms and Beliefs 14 4.3 Gender Roles, Responsibilities, and Time Use 15 4.4 Access to and Control Over Assets and Resources 15 4.5 Patterns of Power and Decision-Making 17 5.
    [Show full text]
  • Populated Printable COP 2009 Rwanda Generated 9/28/2009 12:00:26 AM
    Populated Printable COP 2009 Rwanda Generated 9/28/2009 12:00:26 AM ***pages: 416*** Rwanda Page 1 Table 1: Overview Executive Summary File Name Content Type Date Uploaded Description Uploaded By RWANDA FY 2009 application/msword 11/25/2008 FY 2009 Rwanda Executive KLantis Executive Summary 25 Summary Nov 2009.doc Country Program Strategic Overview Will you be submitting changes to your country's 5-Year Strategy this year? If so, please briefly describe the changes you will be submitting. Yes X No Description: Ambassador Letter File Name Content Type Date Uploaded Description Uploaded By RWANDA FY 2009 application/pdf 11/14/2008 RWANDA FY 2009 KLantis Ambassador Letter.pdf Ambassador Letter Country Contacts Contact Type First Name Last Name Title Email DOD In-Country Contact Ronald J. Miller Defense Attache [email protected] HHS/CDC In-Country Contact Pratima Raghunathan Country Director [email protected] Peace Corps In-Country John Reddy Country Director [email protected] Contact USAID In-Country Contact Dennis Weller Mission Director [email protected] U.S. Embassy In-Country Cheryl Sim Deputy Chief of Mission [email protected] Contact Global Fund In-Country Daniel Ngamije PMU Coordinator [email protected] Representative Global Fund What is the planned funding for Global Fund Technical Assistance in FY 2009? $0 Does the USG assist GFATM proposal writing? Yes Does the USG participate on the CCM? Yes Generated 9/28/2009 12:00:26 AM ***pages: 416*** Rwanda Page 2 Table 2: Prevention, Care, and Treatment Targets 2.1 Targets for
    [Show full text]
  • Compendium of the Key Reference Documents
    Integration of Local Authorities Rwanda in the European Cooperation Programming Process 2021-2027 Compendium of the Key Reference Documents Kigali, July 2020 Table of Contents ABBREVIATIONS AND ACCRONYMS ........................................................................................................ iii 1. INTRODUCTION ............................................................................................................................... 1 1.1. Background and Context .......................................................................................................... 1 1.2. Methodology ........................................................................................................................... 2 1.3. Organisation of the compendium ............................................................................................ 2 2. THE NATIONAL DECENTRALISATION POLICY.................................................................................... 3 2.1. Brief historical reminder .......................................................................................................... 3 2.2. Administrative delimitation and decentralisation in Rwanda .................................................. 4 2.3. Legal framework governing Decentralization in Rwanda ......................................................... 7 2.3.1. The Constitution ............................................................................................................... 7 2.3.2. Law Nº87/2013 of 11/09/2013 determining the
    [Show full text]
  • World Bank Documents
    REPUBLIC OF RWANDA Public Disclosure Authorized MINISTRY IN CHARGE OF EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT P.O. Box: 4386 KIGALI Public Disclosure Authorized SOCIO-ECONOMIC INCLUSION OF REFUGEES AND HOST COMMUNITIES PROJECT (SEIRHCP) Public Disclosure Authorized ENVIRONMENTAL AND SOCIAL MANAGEMENT FRAMEWORK (ESMF) FINAL REPORT Public Disclosure Authorized March 2019 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY In the framework of improving the living conditions of refugees and host communities, the Government of Rwanda through the Ministry in Charge of Emergency Management and with the funding from the World Bank is developing the project entitled “Socio Economic Inclusion of Refugees and Host Communities” (SEIRHCP). The project will be implemented in the six Districts hosting refugee camps, namely Kirehe, Gatsibo, Karongi, Nyamagabe, Gisagara, and Gicumbi hosting respectively the refugee camps Mahama, Nyabiheke, Kiziba, Kigeme, Mugombwa, and Gihembe. The project has four components: the first component aims to ensure access to basic services and socio-economic investments. The component is divided into two parts: access to basic services (education, health and water) and socio-economic investments (roads and markets). The key sub- project activities will include construction, rehabilitation, or upgrading school infrastructures, health facilities, water and sanitation facilities, roads, and markets in six districts hosting refugees. The second component aims to ensure economic opportunity with access to finance (grants or loans) and livelihood opportunities to both refugees and host community. The main objectives of this component are to promote entrepreneurship and wage employment through access to finance (grants or loans) and to provide capacity building for improved access to finance to refugees and host communities. Component three aims to rehabilitate the environment in and around refugee camps.
    [Show full text]
  • Literacy Boost in Rwanda: Impact Evaluation of a Two Year Randomized Control Trial
    Literacy Boost in Rwanda: Impact Evaluation of a Two Year Randomized Control Trial Report Editors: Elliott Friedlander, Research Director Claude Goldenberg, Principal Investigator Stanford University Graduate School of Education Literacy Boost in Rwanda: Impact Evaluation of a Two Year Randomized Control Trial Compiled and Edited by Elliott Friedlander & Claude Goldenberg © 2016 The views and opinions stated in this report are that of the authors alone, and do not necessarily represent the view of Rwanda Education Board, the Ministry of Education of Rwanda, Save the Children, or any other individuals or organizations affiliated with the project. All research contained in this report conducted in conjunction with Stanford’s appointed co-researcher at the Rwanda Education Board. Research activities in Rwanda were conducted with permission and under the supervision of: 1) The Directorate of Science, Technology, and Research in the Ministry of Education in Rwanda Reference: MINEDUC/S&T/0143/2013 2) The Rwanda National Ethics Committee Reference: 423/RNEC/2016 3) The Stanford Institutional Review Board (IRB) Protocol ID: 26580 For further information about the research, please contact the Research Director, Elliott Friedlander, at [email protected] or [email protected]. Recommended Citation for the Overall Report Friedlander, E. & Goldenberg, C. (eds.). (2016). Literacy Boost in Rwanda: Impact Evaluation of a 2-year Randomized Control Trial. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Executive Summary The Learning Crisis Reading, writing, and literacy in general are foundational to modern education. Recognizing the importance of literacy development and education more broadly, the global community came together in recent decades and committed enormous resources to ensuring all children globally had access to primary education.
    [Show full text]
  • Analysis of the Causes of Financial And
    ANALYSIS OF THE CAUSES OF FINANCIAL AND NON- FINANCIAL WEAKNESSES IDENTIFIED IN THE AUDITOR GENERAL’S REPORTS OF DECENTRALIZED ENTITIES FOR THE FINANCIAL YEAR ENDING 30 JUNE 2014 www.tirwanda.orgwww.tirwanda.org Transparency International Rwanda is a local chapter of a global movement with one vision: a world in which government, business, civil society and the daily lives of people are free of corruption. Since 2004, we are contributing to the fight against corruption in Rwanda to turn this vision into reality. www.tirwanda.org 2 © 2015 Transparency International Rwanda. All rights reserved. Every effort has been made to verify the accuracy of the information contained in this report. All information was believed to be correct as of December 2015. Nevertheless, Transparency International Rwanda cannot accept responsibility for the consequences of its use for other purposes or in other contexts. www.tirwanda.orgwww.tirwanda.org EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Transparency International Rwanda (TI-Rw) analyses expenditure- and non-expenditure related weaknesses of decentralized entities as highlighted in the Auditor General’s Report since 2012. The present analysis, a third of its kind, has focused on the reports for the financial year ending June, 2014 for all districts and the City of Kigali. This report is intended to broad audience including both interested public and public finance and local government stakeholders. The total monetary value related to the identified weaknesses in districts reached 112,650,524,574 RWF in the financial year 2013/14. This is a slight improvement to the year 2012/13. Still, this decrease marks only a marginal improvement equivalent to 1% of all identified weaknesses.
    [Show full text]
  • Republic of Rwanda
    Republic of Rwanda FINAL REPORT Legislative Elections to the Chamber of Deputies 15 – 18 September 2008 EUROPEAN UNION ELECTION OBSERVATION MISSION This report is available in English and French, but only the English version is official. This report was produced by the EU Election Observation Mission and presents the EU EOM’s findings on the 15 – 18 September 2008 Legislative Elections in Rwanda. These views have not been adopted or in any way approved by the European Commission and should not be relied upon as a statement of the Commission. The European Commission does not guarantee the accuracy of the data included in this report, nor does it accept responsibility for any use made thereof. TABLE OF CONTENTS I. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 3 II. INTRODUCTION 7 III. POLITICAL BACKGROUND 7 IV. LEGAL ISSUES 10 V. ELECTION ADMINISTRATION 18 VI. VOTER REGISTRATION 21 VII. REGISTRATION OF CANDIDATES/POLITICAL PARTIES/LISTS 22 VIII. ELECTION CAMPAIGN AND PRE-ELECTION ENVIRONMENT 25 IX. MEDIA AND THE ELECTIONS 29 X. PARTICIPATION OF WOMEN IN THE ELECTORAL PROCESS 34 XI. PARTICIPATION OF CIVIL SOCIETY IN THE ELECTORAL PROCESS 35 XII. ELECTION DAY (DIRECT ELECTIONS OF 15 SEPTEMBER) 37 XIII. RESULTS 39 XIV. INDIRECT ELECTIONS 43 XV. RECOMMENDATIONS 44 XVI. ANNEX I - MEDIA MONITORING GRAPHICS 47 EU Election Observation Mission, Rwanda 2008 3 Final Report on the Legislative Elections 15 – 18 September I. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY The 2008 elections for the chamber of deputies were the second legislative elections after the adoption of the 2003 constitution, which officially marked the end of the immediate post-genocide transition phase. From 15-18 September, 80 deputies were elected, 53 of which by direct universal suffrage.
    [Show full text]
  • Republic of Rwanda
    REPUBLIC OF RWANDA Public Disclosure Authorized Public Disclosure Authorized MINISTRY OF AGRICULTURE AND ANIMAL RESOURCES RWANDA FEEDER ROADS DEVELOPMENT PROJECT Public Disclosure Authorized FINAL REPORT ENVIRONMENTAL AND SOCIAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT FOR SELECTED FEEDER ROADS NYAMASHEKE DISTRICT Public Disclosure Authorized NOVEMBER, 2013 Environmental and Social Impact Assessment for Selected Feeder Roads in the District of Nyamasheke in Rwanda - Project ID: P 126498 TABLE OF CONTENTS List of Tables 4 List of Figures 5 List of Photographs 5 List of Annexure 5 Abbreviation 5 0 Executive Summary 8 PART I ENVIRONMENTAL AND SOCIAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT 14 1 Introduction 14 1.1 Background of the Project 14 1.2 Objective 15 1.3 Scope of Services 16 1.4 Approach and Methodology 16 1.4.1 Review of Baseline Data and Up-date 17 1.4.2 Environmental and Social Impact Assessment 19 1.4.3 Social Analysis 19 1.4.4 Environmental and Social Management Plan 20 1.4.5 Environmental and Social Monitoring 20 1.5 Liaison with Authorities 20 1.6 Format of the Report 20 2 Policy, Legal and Administrative Framework 22 2.1 National Relevant Policies and Strategy 22 2.1.1 National Environmental Policy 22 2.1.2 Water Policy 23 2.1.3 National Forest Policy 23 2.1.4 Transport Policy 23 2.1.5 National Land Policy 24 2.1.6 Public Transport Policy on Environmental Sustainability 24 2.1.7 National Development Strategy 24 2.2 Legal Instruments 25 2.2.1 Important Environmental Legislations 25 2.3 Institutional Framework/ Arrangement 20 2.3.1 Province and Districts 28 2.3.2 EIA
    [Show full text]
  • Brief: Rwanda – DRC Cross Border Dynamics, April 2019
    Social Science in Humanitarian Action www.socialscienceinaction.org Brief: Rwanda – DRC cross border dynamics, April 2019 This brief summarises key considerations concerning cross-border dynamics between Rwanda and the Democratic Republic of Congo (DRC) in the context of the outbreak of Ebola in North Kivu and Ituri provinces. It is the second in a series of four briefs focusing on the at risk border areas between DRC and the four high priority neighbouring countries (including Uganda, South Sudan and Burundi).1 As of April 2019, there had been no case of Ebola imported from the DRC into Rwanda, although alerts had been triggered on the roads leading from North Kivu towards neighbouring Rwanda and at least one high-risk contact was described as being a Rwandan national. Cross-border movement has been identified as a significant risk to transmission. This brief provides details about cross-border relations, the political and economic dynamics likely to influence these, and specific areas and actors most at risk. The brief is based on a rapid review of existing published and grey literature, previous ethnographic research in Rwanda and DRC, and informal discussions with colleagues from the Rwanda Ministry of Health, UNHCR, UNICEF, WHO, DFID, IOM, USAID, CDC and others. The brief was developed by Hugh Lamarque (The University of Edinburgh’s Social and Political Science Department - Centre for African Studies) with support from Ingrid Gercama, Emelie Yonally and Juliet Bedford (Anthrologica). Additional review and inputs were provided by Patricia Stys (London School of Economics), Jean-Benoît Falisse (University of Edinburgh), Benjamin Chemouni (University of Cambridge), David Peyton (Northwestern University), Papy Muzuri (London School of Economics) and colleagues from DFID (Rwanda Country Office) and UNICEF (Rwanda Country Office and East and Southern Africa Regional Office).
    [Show full text]