DRAFT REVIEW of SIGNIFICANT WATER MANAGEMENT ISSUES for RIVER BASINS DISTRICTS Material for Public Consultation

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

DRAFT REVIEW of SIGNIFICANT WATER MANAGEMENT ISSUES for RIVER BASINS DISTRICTS Material for Public Consultation DRAFT REVIEW OF SIGNIFICANT WATER MANAGEMENT ISSUES FOR RIVER BASINS DISTRICTS Material for public consultation Project: “Preparation of the second update to River Basin Management Plans together with the planning documents constituting the basis for their preparation”, Project No.: POIS.02.01.00-00-0016/16 DRAFT REVIEW OF SIGNIFICANT WATER MANAGEMENT ISSUES FOR RIVER BASINS Material for Public Consultation Warsaw, 2019 r. Project: “Preparation of the second update to River Basin Management Plans together with the planning documents constituting the basis for their preparation”, Project No.: POIS.02.01.00-00-0016/16 DRAFT REVIEW OF SIGNIFICANT WATER MANAGEMENT ISSUES FOR RIVER BASINS Material for Public Consultation Warsaw 2019 Project: “Preparation of the second update to River Basin Management Plans together with the planning documents constituting the basis for their preparation”, Project No.: POIS.02.01.00-00-0016/16 TABLE OF CONTENTS Table of Contents .................................................................................................................................... 2 List of Acronyms ...................................................................................................................................... 5 List of Figures ........................................................................................................................................... 7 1 Introduction .................................................................................................................................. 8 2 Nationwide Problem Areas ......................................................................................................... 16 2.1 Qualitative Protection of Surface Waters and Groundwaters .......................................... 16 2.1.1 Impact of Agricultural Emissions on Water Status .............................................. 16 2.1.2 Impact of Emissions from Fish Rearing and Farming on Water Status ................ 20 2.1.3 Impact of Municipal Emissions on Water Status, including Protection against Wastewater from Households, Recreational Areas and Landfills ....................... 21 2.1.4 Impact of Industrial Emissions on Water Status .................................................. 25 2.1.5 Impact of Atmospheric Deposition on Water Status ........................................... 26 2.2 Morphological Changes of Surface Waters ...................................................................... 27 2.2.1 Impact of Hydromorphological Emissions on Water Status ................................ 27 2.2.2 Impact of Insufficient Potential of Natural Retention and River Restoration, Making Technical Methods of Flood Protection Necessary, on Water Status .... 37 2.2.3 Impact of the Restricted River Passability (in terms of the potential for migration of bi-environmental fish) on Water Status .......................................................... 39 2.3 Protection of Quantitaive Surface and Groundwater Status ............................................ 41 2.3.1 Impact of Climate Change on Water Status and Drought Protection.................. 41 2.3.2 Impact of Excessive Surface Water and Groundwater Intake on their Status ..... 44 2.3.3 Lack of Implementation of Effective Regulation Regarding the Impact of Environmental Flows on Water Status ................................................................ 46 2.4 Legal, Organisational and Social Aspects .......................................................................... 48 2.4.1 Ensuring the Effectiveness of the New Institutional System for the Implementation of WFD Environmental Objectives ............................................ 48 2.4.2 Reducing the Development Pressure on Flood Risk Areas (preserving and restoring natural retention areas) ....................................................................... 50 2.4.3 Ensuring Effective Mechanisms for Obtaining Rights to Real Estate for the Purpose of River Restoration and Recreation of Natural Retention for Flood Prevention Purposes. ........................................................................................... 51 2.4.4 Implementation of Effective Legal Regulations Concerning the Method of Estimating Environmental Flows .......................................................................... 52 2.4.5 Effective Enforcement of New Regulations Concerning the Implementation of the Principle of Cost Recovery for Water Services .............................................. 54 Draft Review of Significant Water Management Issues – Material for Public Consultation 2 Project: “Preparation of the second update to River Basin Management Plans together with the planning documents constituting the basis for their preparation”, Project No.: POIS.02.01.00-00-0016/16 2.5 Economic and Financial Aspects ....................................................................................... 55 2.5.1 Efficiency of Water Resources Usage, Especially in terms of Water Utilisation for Industrial and Municipal Purposes ...................................................................... 55 2.5.2 Problem of Financing Sources .............................................................................. 58 3 Significant Problems in Individual River Basin Districts .............................................................. 59 3.1 The Vistula River Basin District ......................................................................................... 59 3.1.1 Qualitative Protection of Surface Waters and Groundwaters ............................. 59 3.1.2 Morphological Changes of Surface Waters .......................................................... 64 3.1.3 Protection of Qualitative Surface and Groundwater Status ................................ 67 3.2 The Oder River basin District ............................................................................................ 73 3.2.1 Qualitative Protection of Surface Waters and Groundwaters ............................. 73 3.2.2 Morphological Changes of Surface Waters .......................................................... 77 3.2.3 Protection of Quantitative Surface and Groundwater Status ............................. 79 3.3 The Elbe River Basin District ............................................................................................. 86 3.3.1 Qualitative Protection of Surface Waters and Groundwaters ............................. 86 3.3.2 Morphological Changes of Surface Waters .......................................................... 87 3.3.3 Protection of Quantitative Surface and Groundwater Status ............................. 87 3.4 The Banovka River Basin District ...................................................................................... 89 3.4.1 Qualitative Protection of Surface Waters and Groundwaters ............................. 89 3.4.2 Morphological Changes of Surface Waters .......................................................... 90 3.4.3 Protection of Quantitative Surface and Groundwater Status ............................. 91 3.5 The Prokhladnaya River Basin District .............................................................................. 93 3.5.1 Qualitative Protection of Surface Waters and Groundwaters ............................. 93 3.5.2 Morphological Changes of Surface Waters .......................................................... 93 3.5.3 Protection of Quantitative Surface and Groundwater Status ............................. 94 3.6 The Neman River Basin District......................................................................................... 96 3.6.1 Qualitative Protection of Surface Waters and Groundwaters ............................. 96 3.6.2 Morphological Changes of Surface Waters .......................................................... 97 3.6.3 Protection of Quantitative Surface and Groundwater Status ............................. 98 3.7 The Pregoyla River Basin District ...................................................................................... 99 3.7.1 Qualitative Protection of Surface Waters and Groundwaters ............................. 99 3.7.2 Morphological Changes of Surface Waters ........................................................ 101 3.7.3 Protection of Quantitative Surface and Groundwater Status ........................... 102 3.8 The Dniester River Basin District..................................................................................... 104 3.8.1 Qualitative Protection of Surface Waters and Groundwaters ........................... 104 Draft Review of Significant Water Management Issues – Material for Public Consultation 3 Project: “Preparation of the second update to River Basin Management Plans together with the planning documents constituting the basis for their preparation”, Project No.: POIS.02.01.00-00-0016/16 3.8.2 Morphological Changes of Surface Waters ........................................................ 105 3.8.3 Protection of Quantitative Surface Water Status .............................................. 105 3.9 The Danube River Basin District ...................................................................................... 107 3.9.1 Qualitative Protection of Surface Waters and Groundwaters ........................... 107 3.9.2 Morphological Changes of Surface Waters ........................................................ 108 3.9.3 Protection of Quantitative Surface and Groundwater Status ........................... 108 3.10 Significant Economic and Financial Problems in
Recommended publications
  • The Oder-Neisse Line As Poland's Western Border
    Piotr Eberhardt Piotr Eberhardt 2015 88 1 77 http://dx.doi.org/10.7163/ GPol.0007 April 2014 September 2014 Geographia Polonica 2015, Volume 88, Issue 1, pp. 77-105 http://dx.doi.org/10.7163/GPol.0007 INSTITUTE OF GEOGRAPHY AND SPATIAL ORGANIZATION POLISH ACADEMY OF SCIENCES www.igipz.pan.pl www.geographiapolonica.pl THE ODER-NEISSE LINE AS POLAND’S WESTERN BORDER: AS POSTULATED AND MADE A REALITY Piotr Eberhardt Institute of Geography and Spatial Organization Polish Academy of Sciences Twarda 51/55, 00-818 Warsaw: Poland e-mail: [email protected] Abstract This article presents the historical and political conditioning leading to the establishment of the contemporary Polish-German border along the ‘Oder-Neisse Line’ (formed by the rivers known in Poland as the Odra and Nysa Łużycka). It is recalled how – at the moment a Polish state first came into being in the 10th century – its western border also followed a course more or less coinciding with these same two rivers. In subsequent cen- turies, the political limits of the Polish and German spheres of influence shifted markedly to the east. However, as a result of the drastic reverse suffered by Nazi Germany, the western border of Poland was re-set at the Oder-Neisse Line. Consideration is given to both the causes and consequences of this far-reaching geopolitical decision taken at the Potsdam Conference by the victorious Three Powers of the USSR, UK and USA. Key words Oder-Neisse Line • western border of Poland • Potsdam Conference • international boundaries Introduction districts – one for each successor – brought the loss, at first periodically and then irrevo- At the end of the 10th century, the Western cably, of the whole of Silesia and of Western border of Poland coincided approximately Pomerania.
    [Show full text]
  • Szanowni Państwo, Ladies and Gentlemen
    Szanowni Państwo, Oddajemy w Państwa ręce piąte wydanie Katalogu Szpitali Prywatnych. Lecznice, skupione w Ogólnopolskim Stowarzyszeniu Szpitali Prywatnych, dysponują ilością niemal 10 000 łóżek, zatrudniają ponad 35 000 personelu i prawie 60 000 osób współpracujących. Zarządy naszych placówek wciąż podkreślają swą misję publiczną, jaką pełnią szpitale prywatne, świadcząc leczenie w ramach Narodowego Funduszu Zdrowia (96% wykonanych zabiegów). W tym roku Ogólnopolskie Stowarzyszenie Szpitali Prywatnych weszło w 16 rok działalności. Katalog nasz pokazuje, ile ciężkiej pracy wykonali polscy pracodawcy, tworząc tak piękne i przyjazne dla pacjenta ośrodki, które za sprawą Narodowego Funduszu Zdrowia świadczą wysokospecjalistyczną pomoc dla każdego polskiego obywatela. Uzupełnieniem katalogu od kilku lat stał się wydawany cyklicznie zeszyt statystyczny opisujący w sposób uporządkowany funkcjonowanie i toczenie ekonomiczne sektora szpitali prywatnych. Andrzej Sokołowski Prezes Zarządu Ogólnopolskiego Stowarzyszenia Szpitali Prywatnych Ladies and Gentlemen, We are pleased to present to you the fifth edition of the Catalogue of Private Hospitals. The entities affiliated in the Polish Association of Private Hospitals have almost 10.000 hospital beds, employ over 35.000 medical staff and almost 60.000 other personnel. Our hospitals’ directors keep underlining that the private medical centres also fulfil a public healthcare mission, delivering healthcare services within the National Health Fund (96% of all their procedures). UNION EUROPEENNE HOSPITALISATION
    [Show full text]
  • The Late Holocene Decline of Trapa Natans L. in Northern Poland in the Light of New Palaeobotanical and Geochemical Data
    Limnol. Rev. (2019) 19, 2: 77–91 DOI 10.2478/limre-2019-0007 The late Holocene decline of Trapa natans L. in Northern Poland in the light of new palaeobotanical and geochemical data Agnieszka Lewandowska1*, Przemysław Niedzielski2, Mariusz Gałka3 1Department of Biogeography and Palaeoecology, Adam Mickiewicz University in Poznan, Krygowskiego 10, 61-680 Poznań, Poland, e-mail: [email protected] (* corresponding author) 2Department of Analytical Chemistry, Adam Mickiewicz University in Poznan, Umultowska 89, 61-614 Poznań, Poland, e-mail: [email protected] 3Department of Geobotany and Plant Ecology, University of Lodz, Banacha 12/16, 90-237 Łódź, Poland, e-mail: [email protected] Abstract: Trapa natans (water chestnut) is an aquatic, thermophilic plant whose decline has been observed in many localities in central Europe during the last decades. In this paper, we present a description of two new T. natans subfossil sites located outside its present northern distribution in Poland. High-resolution analysis of plant macrofossils supported by geochemical analysis were undertaken to reconstruct the palaeoecological habitat and examine the cause of the late Holocene decline of T. natans that took place ca. 4000 calibrated years before AD 1950 (cal. yr BP) in a paleolake, presently the Bagno Kusowo bog. Its disappearance was a consequence of terrestrialisation and the development of peatland. In paleolake sediments covered by the peat layer in the Mechacz Wielki bog, T. natans macrofossils were found from before ca. 3300 cal. yr BP. The decline ofT. natans could have resulted from the changes and development of other plant communities where the dominant role was played by Stratiotes aloides and Nymphaea sp.
    [Show full text]
  • Program Ochrony Środowiska Dla Powiatu Średzkiego
    Zleceniodawca: Starostwo Powiatowe w Środzie Śląskiej ul. Wrocławska 2 55 – 300 Środa Śląska Temat: PROGRAM OCHRONY ŚRODOWISKA DLA POWIATU ŚREDZKIEGO Wykonawca: PPD WROTECH Sp. z o.o. ul. Australijska 64 B, 54-404 Wrocław tel. (0-71) 357-57-57, fax 357-76-36, e-mail: [email protected] Wrocław, czerwiec 2004 r. Program Ochrony Środowiska dla powiatu średzkiego Spis treści Spis tabel: ............................................................................................................................. 4 Spis wykresów: .................................................................................................................... 4 Spis rysunków: ..................................................................................................................... 5 1. WPROWADZENIE ......................................................................................................... 6 1.1. Podstawa formalno – prawna opracowania ............................................................ 6 1.2. Cel i zakres Programu Ochrony Środowiska .......................................................... 6 1.3. Korzyści wynikające z posiadania Programu Ochrony Środowiska ........................ 8 1.4. Metodyka opracowania Programu Ochrony Środowiska ........................................ 8 2. Ogólna charakterystyka powiatu ................................................................................. 9 2.1. Położenie i funkcje powiatu .................................................................................... 9 2.2. Warunki
    [Show full text]
  • United Nations Development Programme United Nations
    UNITED NATIONS DEVELOPMENT PROGRAMME UNITED NATIONS DEVELOPMENT PROGRAMME GLOBAL ENVIRONMENT FACILITY GOVERNMENT OF THE REPUBLIC OF POLAND Project Brief Number: POL/03/G3X PIMS number: 1623 Title: Biodiversity Conservation and Management in the Barycz Valley Country: Poland Duration: 3 years UNDP and Cost Sharing ACC/UNDP (Sub) Sector: G3: Environment (in US$) GEF Focal Area: Multiple Focal Area: BD/IW UNDP Managed Funds GEF Operational Programme: OP 12 UNDP/GEF Implementing Agency: PTPP “Pro Natura” Project: 964,350 Executing Agency: PTPP “Pro Natura” PDF: 23,968 Sub-total GEF 988,318 Estimated Starting Date: April 2004 Co financing: 10,237,351 Operational Programme OP 12 Total Project Costs: 11,225,669 Strategic priority EM1 Summary The objective of this project is to implement the Barycz Valley’s “Regional Sustainable Development Strategy” (RSDS) on a pilot demonstration basis. With technical and financial support from the PDF-A, the municipalities of the Barycz Valley defined priorities and actions that integrate resource use and biodiversity protection into social and economic development of the Barycz Valley. These agreed priorities and actions constitute the “Regional Sustainable Development Strategy”, a planning document that puts in place an integrated ecosystem management approach to the use of land, water and biodiversity resources in the Barycz Valley. The MSP will co-finance the execution of priority activities of the RSDS in the areas of (i) nature tourism; (ii) decreasing pollution loads into international water systems; (iii) nature-friendly fish farming; (iv) conservation of globally significant meadows and (v) public support for biodiversity conservation. These activities show clear global benefits in the area of biodiversity and international waters.
    [Show full text]
  • Grubość Pokrywy Śnieżnej I Zapas Wody W Śniegu Na Stacjach 21.11.2020 Meteorologicznych IMGW-PIB
    INSTYTUT METEOROLOGII I GOSPODARKI WODNEJ PAŃSTWOWY INSTYTUT BADAWCZY Centralne Biuro Hydrologii Operacyjnej w Warszawie ul. Podleśna 61, 01-673 Warszawa tel.: (22) 56-94-140 fax.: (22) 83-45-097 e-mail: [email protected] www..imgw.pl www.meteo.imgw.pl www.stopsuszy.imgw.pll Grubość pokrywy śnieżnej i zapas wody w śniegu na stacjach 21.11.2020 meteorologicznych IMGW-PIB Grubość Zapas Norma Grubość świeżo Gatunek Obciążenie Lp. Nazwa stacji Rzeka Zlewnia Województwo Wysokość wody obciążenia pokrywy spadłego śniegu śniegiem w śniegu śniegiem śniegu m n.p.m. cm cm kod mm kN/m 2 kN/m 2 A B C D E F G H I J K L 1. BOGATYNIA Miedzianka (17416) Nysa Łużycka (174) dolnośląskie 295 0,665 2. BOLESŁAWÓW Morawka (12162) Nysa Kłodzka (12) dolnośląskie 600 2,800 3. BUKÓWKA Bóbr (16) Bóbr (16) dolnośląskie 510 2,170 4. GRYFÓW ŚLĄSKI Kwisa (166) Kwisa (166) dolnośląskie 325 0,875 5. JAKUSZYCE Kamienna (162) Bóbr (16) dolnośląskie 860 1,0 1 1 4,620 6. JELCZ-LASKOWICE Widawa (136) Widawa (136) dolnośląskie 135 0,700 7. JELENIA GÓRA Bóbr (16) Bóbr (16) dolnośląskie 342 1,0 0 1 0,994 8. KAMIENICA Kamienica (121624) Nysa Kłodzka (12) dolnośląskie 680 3,360 9. KAMIENNA GÓRA Bóbr (16) Bóbr (16) dolnośląskie 360 1,120 10. KARPACZ Skałka (161844) Bóbr (16) dolnośląskie 575 1,0 0 2 2,625 11. KŁODZKO Nysa Kłodzka (12) Nysa Kłodzka (12) dolnośląskie 356 1,092 12. LĄDEK-ZDRÓJ Biała Lądecka (1216) Nysa Kłodzka (12) dolnośląskie 460 1,820 13. LEGNICA Kaczawa (138) Kaczawa (138) dolnośląskie 122 0,700 14.
    [Show full text]
  • The Impact of the Coexistence of Methane Hazard and Rock-Bursts on the Safety of Works in Underground Hard Coal Mines
    energies Article The Impact of the Coexistence of Methane Hazard and Rock-Bursts on the Safety of Works in Underground Hard Coal Mines Justyna Swolkie ´n* and Nikodem Szl ˛azak Faculty of Mining and Geoengineering, AGH University of Science and Technology Kraków, 30-059 Kraków, Poland; [email protected] * Correspondence: [email protected] Abstract: Several natural threats characterize hard coal mining in Poland. The coexistence of methane and rock-burst hazards lowers the safety level during exploration. The most dangerous are high- energy bumps, which might cause rock-burst. Additionally, created during exploitation, safety pillars, which protect openings, might be the reason for the formation of so-called gas traps. In this part, rock mass is usually not disturbed and methane in seams that form the safety pillars is not dangerous as long as they remain intact. Nevertheless, during a rock-burst, a sudden methane outflow can occur. Preventing the existing hazards increases mining costs, and employing inadequate measures threatens the employees’ lives and limbs. Using two longwalls as examples, the authors discuss the consequences of the two natural hazards’ coexistence. In the area of longwall H-4 in seam 409/4, a rock-burst caused a release of approximately 545,000 cubic meters of methane into the excavations, which tripled methane concentration compared to the values from the period preceding the burst. In the second longwall (IV in seam 703/1), a bump was followed by a rock-burst, which reduced the amount of air flowing through the excavation by 30 percent compared to the airflow before, and methane release rose by 60 percent.
    [Show full text]
  • The Typology of the Nature Values in the Mining Towns on the Examples from the Region of the Rybnik Coal Area
    Title: The typology of the nature values in the mining towns on the examples from the region of the Rybnik Coal Area Author: Katarzyna Pukowiec, Wojciech Kurda Citation style: Pukowiec Katarzyna, Kurda Wojciech (2013). The typology of the nature values in the mining towns on the examples from the region of the Rybnik Coal Area. „Environmental & Socio-economic Studies” (2013, Vol. 1, iss. 4, s. 64-72), DOI: 10.1515/environ-2015-0024 Environmental & Socio-economic Studies DOI: 10.1515/environ-2015-0024 Environ. Socio.-econ. Stud., 2013, 1, 4: 64-72 © 2013 Copyright by University of Silesia ________________________________________________________________________________________________ The typology of the nature values in the mining towns on the examples from the region of the Rybnik Coal Area Katarzyna Pukowiec1, Wojciech Kurda2 1Department of Regional Geography and Tourism, Faculty of Earth Sciences, University of Silesia Będzińska Str. 60, 41-200 Sosnowiec, Poland, E–mail (corresponding author): [email protected] 2Department of Tourism and Health Resort Management, Institute of Geography and Spatial Management, Faculty of Biology and Earth Sciences, Jagiellonian University, Gronostajowa Str. 7, 30-387 Kraków, Poland ________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ ABSTRACT Nature’s resources having a usability attribute are nature values – if they are able to provide for human demands that are being exploited. This article relates to the environmental potential of mining and post – mining areas as well as possibilities of its use in the development of tourisms and recreation. An original typology of the nature value and the assessment of the tourist usability of environment of chosen mining towns of the Rybnik Coal Area – Wodzisław Śląski, Radlin, Rydułtowy, and Pszów are presented in this work.
    [Show full text]
  • Lelov: Cultural Memory and a Jewish Town in Poland. Investigating the Identity and History of an Ultra - Orthodox Society
    Lelov: cultural memory and a Jewish town in Poland. Investigating the identity and history of an ultra - orthodox society. Item Type Thesis Authors Morawska, Lucja Rights <a rel="license" href="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/ by-nc-nd/3.0/"><img alt="Creative Commons License" style="border-width:0" src="http://i.creativecommons.org/l/by- nc-nd/3.0/88x31.png" /></a><br />The University of Bradford theses are licenced under a <a rel="license" href="http:// creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/">Creative Commons Licence</a>. Download date 03/10/2021 19:09:39 Link to Item http://hdl.handle.net/10454/7827 University of Bradford eThesis This thesis is hosted in Bradford Scholars – The University of Bradford Open Access repository. Visit the repository for full metadata or to contact the repository team © University of Bradford. This work is licenced for reuse under a Creative Commons Licence. Lelov: cultural memory and a Jewish town in Poland. Investigating the identity and history of an ultra - orthodox society. Lucja MORAWSKA Submitted in accordance with the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy School of Social and International Studies University of Bradford 2012 i Lucja Morawska Lelov: cultural memory and a Jewish town in Poland. Investigating the identity and history of an ultra - orthodox society. Key words: Chasidism, Jewish History in Eastern Europe, Biederman family, Chasidic pilgrimage, Poland, Lelov Abstract. Lelov, an otherwise quiet village about fifty miles south of Cracow (Poland), is where Rebbe Dovid (David) Biederman founder of the Lelov ultra-orthodox (Chasidic) Jewish group, - is buried.
    [Show full text]
  • Conditions of Fish Farming in Natura 2000 Areas, Based on the Example of the Catchment of Barycz
    Journal of Ecological Engineering Volume 17, Issue 3, July 2016, pages 185–192 DOI: 10.12911/22998993/63322 Research Article CONDITIONS OF FISH FARMING IN NATURA 2000 AREAS, BASED ON THE EXAMPLE OF THE CATCHMENT OF BARYCZ Katarzyna Tokarczyk-Dorociak1, Andrzej Drabiński1, Szymon Szewrański2, Sławomir Mazurek3, Wanda Kraśniewska3 1 Institute of Landscape Architecture, Wrocław Universiy of Environmental and Life Sciences, pl. Grunwaldzki 24a, 50-363 Wrocław, Poland, e-mail: [email protected] 2 Department of Spatial Economy, Wroclaw University of Environmental and Life Sciences, Grunwaldzka 53, 50-357 Wrocław, Poland 3 Stawy Milickie SA, Ruda Sułowska 20, 56-300 Milicz, Poland Received: 2016.03.31 ABSTRACT Accepted: 2016.06.01 One of the factors that contributed to the construction of approx.77 km2 offish ponds in Published: 2016.07.01 the catchment of Barycz starting from the 13th century, which in turn transformed the woods into a mosaic of waters, forests and arable land, were the advantageous physi- ographic conditions. Fish farming operations conducted in this area led to the creation of a cultural landscape characterised by unique natural values, similar to the natural landscape. Approx. 240 species of birds are observed here, of which 170 are nesting species. Due to its natural values, this area has been subject to natural reserve protec- tion as part of the Landscape Park “Dolina Baryczy” (the Barycz Valley). It was entered in the “Living Lakes” list and it is protected under the Ramsar Convention as well as under the European nature protection network Natura 2000. The established forms of nature protection mean the introduction of a certain binding regime, pursuant to which the economic activity conducted in protected areas must take into account the prohibi- tions and orders introduced by documents that establish the said forms of protection.
    [Show full text]
  • “Volunteering: Step Forward to Entrepreneurship and Employability”
    “Volunteering: Step Forward to Entrepreneurship and Employability” Poland, Milicz 25.09.2018 - 03.10.2018 Main aim of the project "Volunteering: Step forward to Entrepreneurship and Employability" is to develop capacities of EVS and volunteering organization, increase quality of services provided by EVS organizations and decrease level of youth unemployment of ex – EVS volunteers . Partner countries on this project are : Poland, Republic of Macedonia, Italy, Hungary, Estonia, Romania, Germany, Finland, Spain, Turkey, Latvia, Slovenia. *Each country should send 2 participants* The project is consisted of two mobilities: Training Course in Milicz, Poland (25.09-03.10.2018) and Seminar in Struga, Republic of Macedonia (20-28.11.2018). Participants are obliged to attend both activities. Key objectives of the project: - To increase competencies of youth workers, leaders, mentors/tutors working with EVS to identify and to explore the needs and interests of EVS volunteers related to employability and entrepreneurship; - To develop competencies of youth workers, leaders, mentors/tutors to develop tailor learning support for EVS volunteers; - To strengthen knowledge of youth workers, leaders, mentors/tutors on tools capturing learning and increasing employability and entrepreneurial mindset of EVS volunteers; - To increase capacities of participating organizations to design quality services supporting development of competencies essential for the job market and/or development of businesses; - To support networking and brainstorming ideas for new projects increasing the quality of voluntary and EVS services. - How effectively support EVS volunteers in development of their personal and professional competencies and to reduce the level of unemployment of ex - EVS volunteers. Target group of this training is youth leaders, workers, mentors and tutors motivated to increase quality of EVS services in their organizations.
    [Show full text]
  • Title of the Article in 16 Pt Times Fonts, Bold, with a Line Spacing Of
    Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2005, 2(2), 194–203 International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health ISSN 1660-4601 www.ijerph.org © 2005 by MDPI Conceptual Modeling for Adaptive Environmental Assessment and Management in the Barycz Valley, Lower Silesia, Poland Piotr Magnuszewski1*, Jan Sendzimir2, and Jakub Kronenberg3 1Institute of Physics, Wroclaw University of Technology, Wybrzeze Wyspianskiego 27, 50-370 Wroclaw, Poland 2International Institute of Applied Systems Analysis, Schlossplatz 1, A-2361 Laxenburg, Austria 3Dept of International Economic Relations, University of Lodz, POW 3/5, 90-255 Lodz, Poland *Correspondence to Dr. Piotr Magnuszewski. E-mail: [email protected] Received: 10 January 2005 / Accepted: 10 April 2005 / Published: 14 August 2005 Abstract: The complexity of interactions in socio-ecological systems makes it very difficult to plan and implement policies successfully. Traditional environmental management and assessment techniques produce unsatisfactory results because they often ignore facets of system structure that underlie complexity: delays, feedbacks, and non-linearities. Assuming that causes are linked in a linear chain, they concentrate on technological developments (“hard path”) as the only solutions to environmental problems. Adaptive Management is recognized as a promising alternative approach directly addressing links between social and ecological systems and involving stakeholders in the analysis and decision process. This “soft path” requires special tools to facilitate
    [Show full text]