Self-Assessment Report 2019-20

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Self-Assessment Report 2019-20 SELF-ASSESSMENT REPORT 2019-20 1 Contents GRADING 3 CONTEXTUAL INFORMATION 3 OUR PROVISION AND BREAKDOWN OF LEAVERS 3 WHAT IS IT LIKE TO BE A LEARNER AT WALTHAM FOREST COLLEGE? 6 SUMMARY OF SELF ASSESSMENT JUDGEMENTS 7 SUMMARY OF OVERALL EFECTIVENESS 7 SAFEGUARDING 8 LEADERSHIP & MANAGEMENT 10 QUALITY OF EDUCATION 12 BEHAVIOUR AND ATTITUDES 16 PERSONAL DEVELOPMENT 18 EDUCATION PROGRAMMES FOR YOUNG PEOPLE 20 ADULT LEARNING 23 APPRENTICESHIPS 25 HIGH NEEDS FUNDED LEARNERS 28 SUMMARY OF KEY PERFORMANCE DATA 31 2 GRADING CONTEXTUAL INFORMATION Waltham Forest College is a medium-sized general further education college in East London. The College provides education programmes for young people, adult learning programmes, apprenticeships and provision for learners who have high needs. There are approximately 1,547 learners aged 16 to 18 following full-time study programmes. Of these, around two thirds were studying courses up to level 2, and the remainder at level 3. Some 5,895 adult learners were attending the college, most of whom were on part-time courses. In addition, by the end of July there were 466 learners on apprenticeships. The college receives high needs funding for 141 learners who are in a bespoke area or are located across the curriculum. The borough of Waltham Forest is diverse, both ethnically and socially, with 97 languages spoken by learners at the college, the top five languages spoken locally other than English are Urdu, Polish, Romanian, Turkish and Lithuanian. The borough is home to an estimated 271,200 residents and about half the local residents are from a minority ethnic background, with the top five countries of origin being Pakistan, Poland, Romania, Jamaica and India. The significant majority of businesses in the area (93%) are micro-businesses, employing fewer than 10 people. The average salary in the borough is lower than the London average, at £30,900. Waltham Forest is currently ranked 35th most deprived borough nationally according to the 2015 Index of Multiple Deprivation. The proportion of pupils at local schools who achieve five GCSEs with high grades is below the national rate, and below the average for schools in London. The significant majority of learners who attend Waltham Forest College have not yet achieved high grades in GCSE English and maths. OUR PROVISION AND BREAKDOWN OF LEAVERS We offer study programmes across all curriculum areas at Waltham Forest College as well as a range of adult programmes and apprenticeships. The following table shows the number of leavers in 2018/19, including maths and English, in each provision type. Table A: Number of leavers in 2018/19, including Maths and English, in each provision type Study programmes 3,537 Apprenticeships 345 Adult learning 6,828 High needs learners 141 3 Leavers by Age The chart below indicates the percentage of leavers by age. Chart 1: Percentage of leavers by age 16-18 38% 19+ 62% Leavers by Level Chart 2: Leavers by Level 4398 2610 2132 1198 36 68 ENTRY LEVEL 1 LEVEL 2 LEVEL 3 LEVEL 4 OTHER 4 Leavers by Qualification Type Chart 3: Leavers by Qualification Type 2.0 1.5 17.0 36.2 13.0 6.1 7.8 16.5 Access to HE Basic Skills Maths and English Diploma GCSE Maths and English Award Certificate ESOL Other Non-reg 5 WHAT IS IT LIKE TO BE A LEARNER AT WALTHAM FOREST COLLEGE? Learners feel part of a supportive community at the college, feel safe, and have a good understanding of how to stay safe through a myriad of awareness raising activities and community events. A strong team of support staff work closely with curriculum so that young learners feel well supported, respected and valued. Learners on education programmes for young people, including those with High Needs, benefit from high-quality teaching, enrichment and work experience activities, which motivates them to achieve their qualifications and vastly improves their employability skills. For example, Travel and Tourism, Business and IT learners undertook placements in Portugal. As a result, they developed the skills and knowledge sought by employers, as well as developing their understanding of different cultures. Adult learners, many of whom are from the most disadvantaged and hard-to-reach groups, benefit from inclusive and highly personalised programmes. They gain confidence from the high-quality provision which enables them to improve their life chances and develop personal and social skills, such as helping their children with schoolwork. For many, their experiences are life-changing and enable them to gain or return to employment. Learners and apprentices feel well supported and develop their confidence, team working skills and self-belief with the support of staff. Teachers and assessors know and care about their learners and work very effectively with support staff need to deal with barriers to learning. For example, this was especially important during lockdown with a marked increase in safeguarding referrals of almost 8% in comparison to the previous year. As a result, learners feel more secure and gain the self-confidence they need to make progress even when dealing with COVID-19. Most apprentices have suitable access to high-quality, industry standard equipment and facilities. This ensures that apprentices are quick to acquire the knowledge and skills they need to use within the work they do with their employers. Consequently, they successfully complete their apprenticeship within the agreed timeframe and improve their future employment or promotion prospects. The vast majority of learners develop aspirational plans that staff support them to achieve, which is demonstrated by the marked 10% increase in study programme progression rates in 2019-20. Learners with high needs achieve well and make good progress and participate in work placement opportunities such as with Organic Lea (a nursery) and the Tottenham Hotspur Foundation Pathway to Employment programme, which prepares them well for their next steps. Most learners and apprentices experience very good teaching and support. They develop new knowledge, skills and behaviours that prepare them well for further study or employment. The good and ever improving links that staff have with local employers and higher education providers, such as London Metropolitan University, mean that students gain good exposure to the workplace. Learners feel valued. They appreciate the excellent support and guidance they receive from staff and good resources that help them learn and progress. The vast majority of learners on Education Programmes for Young People have clear career aims, demonstrate positive attitudes to learning and behave well. 6 SUMMARY OF SELF ASSESSMENT JUDGEMENTS KEY JUDGEMENTS Overall Effectiveness Good The Quality of Education Good Behaviour and Attitudes Good Personal development Good Leadership and Management Good PROVISION TYPES Education Programmes for Young People Good Adult Learning Programmes Good Apprenticeships Good Provision for Learners with High Needs Good Overall Effectiveness at Previous Inspection Good SUMMARY OF OVERALL EFECTIVENESS The College has self-assessed the overall effectiveness of education to be good. The College is good because: • Leaders and managers use their effective partnerships to shape and plan the college curriculum to meet the needs of the local and regional economy well • Arrangements with community providers and local agencies are particularly successful in engaging hard to reach groups from within local communities including the unemployed and those at risk of becoming NEET • The quality of teaching, learning and assessment overall is good, with a clear focus on skills development and building confidence, enabling the majority of learners to achieve their qualifications and develop employability skills in order to enhance their progression and employment opportunities • Effective quality improvement processes have led to significant improvements in key focus areas including achievement rates for 16-18 vocational learning (increased by 5.3% compared to 2018/19); and increased achievement rates for level 2 provision by 6.4% and level 3 provision by 5.1%. • A highly inclusive and supportive environment supports social cohesion and builds confidence enabling learners from widely differing backgrounds and abilities to succeed, including those with high needs • Behaviour and conduct of learners is excellent within a safe and inclusive environment 7 The College is not yet outstanding because: • Achievement rates require improvement particularly in entry level and level 1 functional skills and ESOL. These areas were most impacted by Covid-19 and the lockdown • Continue to improve the overall quality of teaching, learning and assessment so that it is consistently high across all curriculum areas. • Continue to improve attendance and in particular attendance of 16–18 year olds to English and maths classes which whilst improving is lower than vocational classes and requires further improvement SAFEGUARDING The arrangements for safeguarding are effective and our Ofsted Safeguarding Monitoring Visit in February 2020 demonstrated that the College had made reasonable progress. Leaders and managers have established a suitable culture for safeguarding. There are appropriate policies, procedures and risk assessments, including in relation to the ‘Prevent’ duty. Leaders have created effective safeguarding roles within the college, referred to as the ‘BeSafe’ team. Learners have a good awareness of this team and its purpose. Governors have a secure overview of safeguarding. They receive sufficiently
Recommended publications
  • College Employer Satisfaction League Table
    COLLEGE EMPLOYER SATISFACTION LEAGUE TABLE The figures on this table are taken from the FE Choices employer satisfaction survey taken between 2016 and 2017, published on October 13. The government says “the scores calculated for each college or training organisation enable comparisons about their performance to be made against other colleges and training organisations of the same organisation type”. Link to source data: http://bit.ly/2grX8hA * There was not enough data to award a score Employer Employer Satisfaction Employer Satisfaction COLLEGE Satisfaction COLLEGE COLLEGE responses % responses % responses % CITY COLLEGE PLYMOUTH 196 99.5SUSSEX DOWNS COLLEGE 79 88.5 SANDWELL COLLEGE 15678.5 BOLTON COLLEGE 165 99.4NEWHAM COLLEGE 16088.4BRIDGWATER COLLEGE 20678.4 EAST SURREY COLLEGE 123 99.2SALFORD CITY COLLEGE6888.2WAKEFIELD COLLEGE 78 78.4 GLOUCESTERSHIRE COLLEGE 205 99.0CITY COLLEGE BRIGHTON AND HOVE 15088.0CENTRAL BEDFORDSHIRE COLLEGE6178.3 NORTHBROOK COLLEGE SUSSEX 176 98.9NORTHAMPTON COLLEGE 17287.8HEREFORDSHIRE AND LUDLOW COLLEGE112 77.8 ABINGDON AND WITNEY COLLEGE 147 98.6RICHMOND UPON THAMES COLLEGE5087.8LINCOLN COLLEGE211 77.7 EXETER COLLEGE 201 98.5CHESTERFIELD COLLEGE 20687.7WEST NOTTINGHAMSHIRE COLLEGE242 77.4 SOUTH GLOUCESTERSHIRE AND STROUD COLLEGE 215 98.1ACCRINGTON AND ROSSENDALE COLLEGE 14987.6BOSTON COLLEGE 61 77.0 TYNE METROPOLITAN COLLEGE 144 97.9NEW COLLEGE DURHAM 22387.5BURY COLLEGE121 76.9 LAKES COLLEGE WEST CUMBRIA 172 97.7SUNDERLAND COLLEGE 11487.5STRATFORD-UPON-AVON COLLEGE5376.9 SWINDON COLLEGE 172 97.7SOUTH
    [Show full text]
  • London ESF Youth Programme Providers
    London ESF Youth Programme Providers Information is based on the latest data provided to the GLA. If you think the information here is incorrect please inform us by emailing: [email protected] Strand Contract Lead Lead Provider Contact Delivery Partner Name Contact Details (Name, email and phone no) Delivery Location(s) [email protected] Groundwork Big Creative Playback Studios Newham Council Newham College Barking & Dagenham, Enfield, Greenwich, Hackney, Haringey, Havering Think Forward Urban Futures REED in Partnership The Challenge NXG Preventative NEET North & North East Prevista Ameel Beshoori, [email protected] Cultural Capital Central Prevista Ameel Beshoori, [email protected] Groundowrk [email protected] Lewisham, Southwark, Lambeth, Wandsworth, Big Creative City of London, Westminster, Kensington & Chelsea, Camden and Islington The Write Time Playback Studios Think Forward PSEV NXG Inspirational Youth South Prevista Ameel Beshoori, [email protected] Groundwork Bexley, Bromley, Croydon, Sutton, Merton, The Write Time Kingston and Richmond [email protected] Playback Studios Prospects Richmond Council All Dimensions Barnet Brent Ealing Hammersmith & Fulham NXG Harrow Hillingdon Hounslow Cultural Capital West Prevista Ameel Beshoori, [email protected] Groundwork Playback Studios [email protected] Urban Futures PSEV REED in Partnership NEET Outreach North & North East Reed In Partnership Freddie Sumption, [email protected] City Gateway Katherine Brett, [email protected] Delivery:
    [Show full text]
  • Waltham Forest College
    REPORT FROM THE INSPECTORATE Waltham Forest College June 1995 THE FURTHER EDUCATION FUNDING COUNCIL FEFC INSPECTION REPORT 86/95 WALTHAM FOREST COLLEGE GREATER LONDON REGION Inspected September 1994 – March 1995 Summary Waltham Forest College is a large general further education college which has good external links. It offers a wide range of vocational and academic courses to school leavers and adults. The college is effectively governed and managed, although the management structure within schools should be improved, and curriculum managers and tutors require access to better quality management information. There are effective arrangements for enrolment and induction but the college lacks standard procedures for admissions and pre-course assessment of students’ skills. High-quality information, guidance and counselling is available to students. Valuable additional support is provided in the English and mathematics workshop and students have access to good information technology facilities. The quality of tutorial support varies. There is some good teaching in almost all areas of the college’s work, but there are also a number of curriculum areas where standards need to be raised. Examination results on vocational courses are satisfactory but they are below average for GCE AS/A level courses and GCSE courses. The college is successful in enabling students to enter higher education, particularly from vocational and access courses. There is good practice in course review and evaluation. The college should improve retention and attendance rates and the levels of achievement on some courses; adopt a cross-college approach to developing good practice in tutorial work; develop the libraries as an effective resource for learning; and improve some aspects of its accommodation.
    [Show full text]
  • Open Letter to Address Systemic Racism in Further Education
    BLACK FURTHER EDUCATION LEADERSHIP GROUP 5th August 2020 Open letter to address systemic racism in further education Open letter to: Rt. Hon. Boris Johnson, Prime Minister, Rt. Hon. Gavin Williamson MP, Secretary of State for Education, funders of further education colleges; regulatory bodies & further education membership bodies. We, the undersigned, are a group of Black, Asian and Minority Ethnic (BAME) senior leaders, and allies, who work or have an interest in the UK further education (FE) sector. The recent #BlackLivesMatter (#BLM) global protest following the brutal murder of George Floyd compels us all to revisit how we address the pervasive racism that continues to taint and damage our society. The openness, solidarity and resolve stirred by #BLM is unprecedented and starkly exposes the lack of progress made in race equality since ‘The Stephen Lawrence Enquiry’. Against a background of raised concerns about neglect in healthcare, impunity of policing, cruelty of immigration systems – and in education, the erasure of history, it is only right for us to assess how we are performing in FE. Only by doing so, can we collectively address the barriers that our students, staff and communities face. The personal, economic and social costs of racial inequality are just too great to ignore. At a time of elevated advocacy for FE, failure to recognise the insidious nature of racism undermines the sector’s ability to fully engage with all its constituent communities. The supporting data and our lived experiences present an uncomfortable truth, that too many BAME students and staff have for far too long encountered a hostile environment and a system that places a ‘knee on our neck’.
    [Show full text]
  • Provisional List 1: Dated 9Th October 2017 in Alphabetical Order
    Provisional List 1: Dated 9th October 2017 in Alphabetical Order Colleges & Sixth Forms Date of Open Day / Evening Time Barking Abbey Sports College Tuesday 7th November 2017 7pm - 8:30pm Barking & Dagenham College - Rush Green Campus Thursday 7th December 2017 3.30pm - 7pm Barking & Dagenham College - Rush Green Campus Thursday 18th January 2018 4.30pm - 7pm Barking & Dagenham College - Rush Green Campus Saturday 10th March 2018 10am - 2pm Barking & Dagenham College - Rush Green Campus Thursday 12th April 2018 4.30pm - 7pm Barking & Dagenham College - Rush Green Campus Saturday 12th May 2018 10am - 2pm Barking & Dagenham College - Rush Green Campus Thursday 21st June 2018 3.30pm - 7pm Barking & Dagenham College - Technical Skills Academy Thursday 23rd November 2017 4.30pm - 7pm Barking & Dagenham College - Technical Skills Academy Wednesday 21st February 2018 4.30pm - 7pm Barking & Dagenham College - Technical Skills Academy Saturday 9th June 2018 10am - 2pm Barnet College / Southgate College - Colindale Campus Wednesday 8th November 2017 5pm - 7pm Barnet College / Southgate College - Colindale Campus Wednesday 7th March 2018 5pm - 7pm Barnet College / Southgate College - Colindale Campus Thursday 7th June 2018 3pm – 7pm Barnet College / Southgate College - Southgate Campus Saturday 11th November 2017 10am – 1:45pm Barnet College / Southgate College - Southgate Campus Saturday 3rd March 2018 10am – 1:45pm Barnet College / Southgate College - Southgate Campus Tuesday 12th June 2018 3pm – 7pm Barnet College / Southgate College - Wood Street
    [Show full text]
  • Arts Award & Beyond
    Arts Award & Beyond... Developing Creative Opportunities for Young People across Waltham Forest Report of current provision with Project Action Plan By Laura Elliott, Project Consultant and Coordinator November 2013 – March 2014 CONTENTS Acknowledgements i Explanation of key organisations and terms ii Executive summary iv Project Action Plan vii 1. Introduction 1 1.1 About the report 1 1.2 Research methodology 1 1.3 Report aims and objectives 2 2. Key findings and recommendations 3 2.1 Identify existing arts provision for young people aged 14-25 3 2.2 Identify main structures of communication for arts providers 7 2.3 Provide an overview of the organisation of work experience, apprenticeships and volunteering 9 2.4 Identify the main benefits of Arts Award to education providers 10 2.5 Identify the main incentives and barriers to participation 12 2.6 Identify and encourage new partner organisations able to engage young people not currently participating in the arts 15 2.7 Summary of the full recommendations with action points 16 3. Project Action Plan up to March 2014 17 3.1 Project milestones 18 4 Conclusion 19 Sources 20 Appendices 21 Appendix i: Table of Arts Award and Artsmark activity in schools 21 Appendix ii: List of Waltham Forest education, youth and arts organisations working with young people aged 16-25 22 Appendix iii: Waltham Forest schools networks 26 a) Table of Waltham Forest Area Partnerships 25 b) List of Waltham Forest Schools Networks 26 c) Case Studies of information networks used by two WFAEN member schools 28 Appendix iv: Survey and consultation results 29 Appendix v: Sample of questionnaire 30 Appendix vi: Consultation exercise and notes 33 a) Barriers and benefits 33 b) Next steps: Communication 35 c) Next steps: Work experience 36 Cover illustration: Students from Chingford Foundation School displaying relief prints completed during a workshop at the William Morris Gallery attended as part of their Bronze Arts Award.
    [Show full text]
  • Post 16 High Needs Funding Pdf 738 Kb
    x 1.0 SEND Reforms: The SEND reforms 2014 have changed the legislation over duties to provide support to children. The key features of the reform agenda are: A requirement for the Authority and local Schools to publish their ‘Local Offer’ for Families and Young People with SEN and Disabilities on their websites Education, Health and Social Care Plans (EHC plans) to replace statements, but the threshold to remain as the child’s significant learning need. These to be issued within 20 weeks The use of a personal budget for services within the Education, Health and Care Plan Extension of the EHC plan to 25 years for Young People in Education The extension of the duty to include children and young people in Youth Offending Services Joint Commissioning between Health, Education and Social Care Collaboration and Co-production with families and children The reforms have increased the need for resources for an extended age range of children and young people to be assessed for, and provided with support in education, potentially up to the age of 25 years. This report will focus on the population, funding and educational outcomes for young people aged 16- 25 years 1.1 Population of children with SEN and Disabilities: 1.1.1.In April 2016 Haringey had 1600 children and young people with Statements of SEN and Young People with Learning Difficulty Assessments, this is an increase of 91 children from 2014-2015 where there were 1414 with statements and 100 with LDA’s. In April 2017 this had increased to 1790, an increase of 9% over the previous year.
    [Show full text]
  • Progression of College Students in London to Higher Education 2011 - 2014
    PROGRESSION OF COLLEGE STUDENTS IN LONDON TO HIGHER EDUCATION 2011 - 2014 Sharon Smith, Hugh Joslin and Jill Jameson Prepared for Linking London by the HIVE-PED Research Team, Centre for Leadership and Enterprise in the Faculty of Education and Health at the University of Greenwich Authors: Sharon Smith, Hugh Joslin and Professor Jill Jameson Centre for Leadership and Enterprise, Faculty of Education and Health University of Greenwich The views expressed in this report are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect those of Linking London, its member organisations or its sponsors. Linking London Birkbeck, University of London BMA House Tavistock Square London WC1H 9JP http://www.linkinglondon.ac.uk January 2017 Linking London Partners – Birkbeck, University of London; Brunel University, London; GSM London; Goldsmiths, University of London; King’s College London; Kingston University, London; London South Bank University; Middlesex University; Ravensbourne; Royal Central School for Speech and Drama; School of Oriental and African Studies, University of London; University College London; University of East London; University of Greenwich; University of Westminster; Barnet and Southgate College; Barking and Dagenham College; City and Islington College; City of Westminster College; The College of Enfield, Haringey and North East London; Harrow College; Haringey Sixth Form College; Havering College of Further and Higher Education; Hillcroft College; Kensington and Chelsea College; Lambeth College; Lewisham Southwark College; London South East Colleges; Morley College; Newham College of Further Education; Newham Sixth Form College; Quintin Kynaston; Sir George Monoux College; Uxbridge College; Waltham Forest College; Westminster Kingsway College; City and Guilds; London Councils Young People’s Education and Skills Board; Open College Network London; Pearson Education Ltd; TUC Unionlearn 2 Foreword It gives me great pleasure to introduce this report to you on the progression of college students in London to higher education for the years 2011 - 2014.
    [Show full text]
  • Funding Values for Grant and Procured Providers
    Greater London Authority Adult Education Budget Allocation Grant Values 2020 to 2021 As at 1 August 2020 Version 1.0 UKPRN Provider Name Total GLA AEB funding value (2020/21) 10004927 ACTIVATE LEARNING £107,836 10000143 BARKING & DAGENHAM LONDON BOROUGH COUNCIL £1,679,207 10000528 BARKING AND DAGENHAM COLLEGE £5,996,283 10000533 BARNET & SOUTHGATE COLLEGE £13,285,990 10000560 BASINGSTOKE COLLEGE OF TECHNOLOGY £553,104 10001465 BATH COLLEGE £127,308 10000610 BEDFORD COLLEGE £369,070 10000146 BEXLEY LONDON BOROUGH COUNCIL £2,102,127 10000863 BRENT LONDON BOROUGH COUNCIL £3,062,001 10000878 BRIDGWATER AND TAUNTON COLLEGE £247,601 10000948 BROMLEY COLLEGE OF FURTHER AND HIGHER EDUCATION £6,422,450 10003987 BROMLEY LONDON BOROUGH COUNCIL £1,629,632 10000950 BROOKLANDS COLLEGE £110,746 10000473 BUCKINGHAMSHIRE COLLEGE GROUP £546,875 10001116 CAMBRIDGE REGIONAL COLLEGE £602,322 10003988 CAMDEN LONDON BOROUGH COUNCIL £1,275,584 10001148 CAPEL MANOR COLLEGE £1,963,131 10001467 CITY OF BRISTOL COLLEGE £293,395 10008915 COMMON COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LONDON £713,615 10001778 CROYDON COLLEGE £3,627,156 10003989 CROYDON LONDON BOROUGH COUNCIL £4,335,989 10001919 DERBY COLLEGE GROUP £698,658 10004695 DN COLLEGES GROUP £99,923 10009206 EALING LONDON BOROUGH COUNCIL £827,145 10002094 EALING, HAMMERSMITH & WEST LONDON COLLEGE £8,065,215 10002130 EAST SURREY COLLEGE £882,583 10002923 EAST SUSSEX COLLEGE GROUP £390,066 10002143 EASTLEIGH COLLEGE £3,643,450 10006570 EKC GROUP £463,805 10002638 GATESHEAD COLLEGE £561,385 10002696 GLOUCESTERSHIRE COLLEGE £207,780
    [Show full text]
  • March 2021 Transparency Report.Csv
    All Invoices over £250 including VAT paid during March 2021 Payment Date Supplier Name Supplier Number Expense Area Expense Type Document No. Total (£) 01/03/2021 Manpower Direct Ltd 8338 Resident Services Health & Safety Equipment 6200327351 486,414.94 01/03/2021 Manpower Direct Ltd 8338 Resident Services Health & Safety Equipment 6200327304 230,018.20 01/03/2021 Servelec HSC 5057 Corporate Development Data centre hosting 6200325754 191,010.00 01/03/2021 Kent County Council (Kcs) 1007 Economic Growth, Housing Delivery & Cult Electricity - Service Control 6200328044 143,477.54 01/03/2021 Aston Group 910031 Capital Schemes Facilities & management services - nec 6200327208 82,436.63 01/03/2021 Kent County Council (Kcs) 1007 Economic Growth, Housing Delivery & Cult Electricity 6200328043 71,174.15 01/03/2021 J B Riney & Co Ltd 910367 Resident Services Grounds maintenance - general 6200328116 44,162.69 01/03/2021 Metropolitan Housing 21031 Families & Homes Social community care supplies and services 6200325758 40,000.00 01/03/2021 Aston Group 910031 Capital Schemes Facilities & management services - nec 6200327207 36,261.95 01/03/2021 DSI Billing Services Ltd 18435 Finance & Governance Printing and stationery 6200327772 34,370.99 01/03/2021 A New Direction 24464 Economic Growth, Housing Delivery & Cult Social community care supplies and services 6200325755 25,255.95 01/03/2021 J B Riney & Co Ltd 910367 Resident Services Grounds maintenance - general 6200328118 22,376.11 01/03/2021 The Project Centre Ltd 2308 Capital Schemes Sreet & traffic
    [Show full text]
  • A-Level School Rankings 2016 (London Only)
    A-level school rankings 2016 (London only) Key Gender: B – Boys, G – Girls, M – Mixed School Type: C – Comprehensive, G – Grammar, PS – Partially selective, SFC – Sixth Form College Rank School Locations Entries School Type Gender % achieving A*A+B 2 Henrietta Barnett London 389 G G 95.89 5 King's Coll London Maths London 209 G M 94.74 20 London Academy of London 567 SFC M 86.07 Excellence 29 Cardinal Vaughan London 495 C M 82.83 Memorial RC 39 St Michael's RC Grammar London 377 G G 81.17 64 Newham Collegiate SF London 405 SFC M 76.54 67 Hasmonean High London 304 C M 75.99 71 Camden for Girls London 640 C M 75.47 99 Fortismere London 585 C M 70.94 104 Mossbourne Comm London 383 C M 70.76 Academy 119 Lady Margaret London 260 C G 67.69 140 Jewish Comm Secondary London 66 C M 65.15 158 Grey Coat Hospital London 394 C M 63.2 210 Graveney London 926 PS M 58.42 274 Thomas Tallis London 411 C M 49.88 311 Haberdashers' Aske's London 369 C M 43.9 Hatcham Coll 313 St. Angela's Ursuline London 421 C M 43.47 322 Acton High London 185 C M 36.76 326 Newham SF Coll London 910 SFC M 28.46 London sixth forms & colleges Barking & Dagenham College Hackney Community College Newham Sixth Form College (NewVIc) Barnet and Southgate College Haringey Sixth Form College Redbridge College Bexley College Harrow College Richmond Upon Thames College Bromley College of Further & Higher Havering College of Further & Higher Sir George Monoux College Education Education South Thames College Brooke House Sixth Form College Havering Sixth Form College St Charles Catholic
    [Show full text]
  • Contents Qualifications – Awarding Bodies
    Sharing of Personal Information Contents Qualifications – Awarding Bodies ........................................................................................................... 2 UK - Universities ...................................................................................................................................... 2 UK - Colleges ........................................................................................................................................... 6 Glasgow - Schools ................................................................................................................................. 12 Local Authorities ................................................................................................................................... 13 Sector Skills Agencies ............................................................................................................................ 14 Sharing of Personal Information Qualifications – Awarding Bodies Quality Enhancement Scottish Qualifications Authority Joint Council for Qualifications (JCQ) City and Guilds General Certificate of Secondary Education (GCSE) General Certificate of Education (GCE) Edexcel Pearson Business Development Royal Environmental Health Institute for Scotland (REHIS) Association of First Aiders Institute of Leadership and Management (ILM) Institute of Occupational Safety and Health (IOSH) UK - Universities Northern Ireland Queen's – Belfast Ulster Wales Aberystwyth Bangor Cardiff Cardiff Metropolitan South Wales
    [Show full text]