DOCSLIB.ORG

Progression of College Students in London To

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Progression of College Students in London To PROGRESSION OF COLLEGE STUDENTS IN LONDON TO HIGHER EDUCATION 2007 to 2012 Sharon Smith, Hugh Joslin and Jill Jameson Prepared for Linking London partners by the Centre for Leadership and Enterprise in the Faculty of Education and Health at the University of Greenwich Authors: Sharon Smith, Hugh Joslin and Professor Jill Jameson Centre for Leadership and Enterprise, Faculty of Education and Health University of Greenwich [email protected] ++44(0)20 8331 9487 The authors would like to thank Sue Betts, Director of Linking London, the following sponsors: London Councils Young People’s Education and Skills, King’s College London, SOAS, University of London and Dr Linda Burke, Pro Vice Chancellor, Faculty of Education and Health, University of Greenwich for their support for this project and also thank Rachel Thompson for her work on the databases and tables. The views expressed in this report are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect those of Linking London, its member organisations or its sponsors, London Councils Young People’s Education and Skills, King’s College London and SOAS, University of London. Linking London Birkbeck, University of London Egmont House, 25-31 Tavistock Place London WC1H 9SF http://www.linkinglondon.ac.uk June 2015 Linking London Partners – Birkbeck, University of London; GSM London; Goldsmiths, University of London; King’s College London; Kingston University, London; London South Bank University; Middlesex University; Ravensbourne; Royal Central School for Speech and Drama; School of Oriental and African Studies, University of London; University College London; University of East London; University of Greenwich; University of Westminster; Barnet and Southgate College; Bexley College; Bromley College of Further and Higher Education; City and Islington College; City of Westminster College; The College of Haringey, Enfield and North East London; The College of North West London; Harrow College; Havering College of Further and Higher Education; Hillcroft College; Kensington and Chelsea College; Lambeth College; Lewisham Southwark College; Morley College; Newham College of Further Education; Newham Sixth Form College; Uxbridge College; Waltham Forest College; Westminster Kingsway College; City and Guilds; JISC London Region; London Councils Young People’s Education and Skills Board; Open College Network London; Pearson Education Ltd; TUC Unionlearn 2 Foreword I am delighted to introduce this report to you, and after some delay due to forces beyond any of our control, I recommend this report to you. This is the second report1 on the progression of college students in London to Higher Education (2007 – 12) that Linking London has commissioned from Sharon Smith, Hugh Joslin and Jill Jameson at the University of Greenwich. This report takes our understanding of London college learner progression another step further. In tracking nearly a quarter of a million level three students it allows us to see the work that colleges are doing to support progression. The addition of the Key Stage 4 data illustrates the work colleges have to do to compensate for lack of earlier achievement. For our universities it shows those institutions who receive college learners, some in considerable numbers, who are from some of the most economically deprived areas of London. For our Awarding Body partners it provides a snapshot of qualification achievement over time and its ability to support progression to higher study. There are lessons to be learnt for future planning: a focus on success and achievement and in some areas retention are things we all need to address, including how progression into the most appropriate higher level learning might be improved. This chimes with our partners desire to work collaboratively on a higher level skills policy for London. I commend this report to our partners, with thanks to Hugh, Sharon and Jill and with special thanks to the partners who funded this research: Yolande Burgess at London Councils Young People Education and Skills, Anne-Marie Canning at Kings College London and Marva Coudray at SOAS. As we plan our dissemination strategy for this important piece of research I look forward to working with others who are looking at complimentary aspects of progression work in the capital. Sue Betts Director of Linking London August 2015. 1 The first report we commissioned was entitled the ‘Progression of ‘College Learners to Higher Education In London 2005 – 2010’, supported by another report on the ‘Progression of Apprentices to Higher Education in London 20014 – 10’. These are available on our website www.linkinglondon.ac.uk 3 Contents Foreword ....................................................................................................................................... 3 Contents ........................................................................................................................................ 4 1. Executive summary ................................................................................................................ 7 1.1 Terminology ..................................................................................................................... 7 1.2 Key Results ....................................................................................................................... 8 1.2.1 Characteristics of the London college cohorts ........................................................... 8 1.2.2 Higher education progression trends ........................................................................ 9 2. Introduction ......................................................................................................................... 13 2.1 Terminology ................................................................................................................... 13 2.2 Policy context................................................................................................................. 14 2.3 Longitudinal perspective ................................................................................................ 16 2.4 London educational context ........................................................................................... 17 2.5 Structure of the report ................................................................................................... 19 3. Methodology ....................................................................................................................... 20 3.1 Who is the tracked cohort? ............................................................................................ 20 3.2 The ILR – changes over time, classification and coding ................................................... 20 3.3 Linking to the Department for Education Key Stage 4 dataset ........................................ 21 3.4 Tracking HE achievement ............................................................................................... 21 4. Characteristics of the London college cohorts ..................................................................... 22 4.1 Age ................................................................................................................................ 22 4.2 Qualifications ................................................................................................................. 22 4.3 Age and Level 3 qualification type .................................................................................. 23 4.4 Gender ........................................................................................................................... 24 4.5 Gender and Level 3 qualification type ............................................................................ 24 4.6 FE Institution Type ......................................................................................................... 25 4.7 Breakdown of the cohort figures by individual college ................................................... 26 4.8 Breakdown of the cohorts by London borough .............................................................. 28 4.9 London borough and age breakdown ............................................................................. 29 4.10 London borough and Level 3 qualification breakdown ................................................ 31 4.11 Breakdown of the cohorts by educational disadvantage ............................................ 32 4.12 Disadvantage and qualifications studied .................................................................... 34 4.13 Disadvantage and London borough ........................................................................... 34 4.14 Level 3 sector skills areas ........................................................................................... 35 4.15 Ethnic breakdown of the tracked cohorts .................................................................. 36 4 4.16 Ethnic group and age breakdown .............................................................................. 37 4.17 Ethnic group and London borough breakdown .......................................................... 38 4.18 Ethnic group and Level 3 qualification type ................................................................ 39 4.19 Ethnic group and Level 3 subject area ........................................................................ 41 5. Progression to higher education .......................................................................................... 44 5.1 Overall longitudinal progression
Load more

Recommended publications
  • College Employer Satisfaction League Table
    COLLEGE EMPLOYER SATISFACTION LEAGUE TABLE The figures on this table are taken from the FE Choices employer satisfaction survey taken between 2016 and 2017, published on October 13. The government says “the scores calculated for each college or training organisation enable comparisons about their performance to be made against other colleges and training organisations of the same organisation type”. Link to source data: http://bit.ly/2grX8hA * There was not enough data to award a score Employer Employer Satisfaction Employer Satisfaction COLLEGE Satisfaction COLLEGE COLLEGE responses % responses % responses % CITY COLLEGE PLYMOUTH 196 99.5SUSSEX DOWNS COLLEGE 79 88.5 SANDWELL COLLEGE 15678.5 BOLTON COLLEGE 165 99.4NEWHAM COLLEGE 16088.4BRIDGWATER COLLEGE 20678.4 EAST SURREY COLLEGE 123 99.2SALFORD CITY COLLEGE6888.2WAKEFIELD COLLEGE 78 78.4 GLOUCESTERSHIRE COLLEGE 205 99.0CITY COLLEGE BRIGHTON AND HOVE 15088.0CENTRAL BEDFORDSHIRE COLLEGE6178.3 NORTHBROOK COLLEGE SUSSEX 176 98.9NORTHAMPTON COLLEGE 17287.8HEREFORDSHIRE AND LUDLOW COLLEGE112 77.8 ABINGDON AND WITNEY COLLEGE 147 98.6RICHMOND UPON THAMES COLLEGE5087.8LINCOLN COLLEGE211 77.7 EXETER COLLEGE 201 98.5CHESTERFIELD COLLEGE 20687.7WEST NOTTINGHAMSHIRE COLLEGE242 77.4 SOUTH GLOUCESTERSHIRE AND STROUD COLLEGE 215 98.1ACCRINGTON AND ROSSENDALE COLLEGE 14987.6BOSTON COLLEGE 61 77.0 TYNE METROPOLITAN COLLEGE 144 97.9NEW COLLEGE DURHAM 22387.5BURY COLLEGE121 76.9 LAKES COLLEGE WEST CUMBRIA 172 97.7SUNDERLAND COLLEGE 11487.5STRATFORD-UPON-AVON COLLEGE5376.9 SWINDON COLLEGE 172 97.7SOUTH
    [Show full text]
  • (Literacy and ESOL) Certificate Additional Diploma in Teaching Mathematics (Numeracy) Certificate Additional Diploma in Teaching Disabled Learners
    Certificate Additional Diploma in Teaching English (Literacy and ESOL) Certificate Additional Diploma in Teaching Mathematics (Numeracy) Certificate Additional Diploma in Teaching Disabled Learners Programme Specification 2014/15 Cohort PROGRAMME SPECIFICATION – Certificate Additional Diplomas in Teaching Course Record Information Name and level of Certificate Additional Diploma in Teaching English: Final and Intermediate Awards Literacy & ESOL Certificate Additional in Teaching Mathematics: Numeracy Certificate Additional Diploma in Teaching Disabled Learners Awarding Body/Institution University of Westminster Status of awarding Listed body body/institution Location of Delivery and University of Westminster Education Consortium teaching institutions Colleges: • Amersham & Wycombe College • City Literary Institute • Ealing, Hammersmith and West London College • Harrow College • Newham College • Richmond Adult Community College. • Uxbridge College • West Thames College Mode of Study Part-time, in-service UW Course Code BWBSADT Amersham & Wycombe College City Literary Institute Ealing, Hammersmith and West London College Harrow College Newham College Uxbridge College West Thames College JACS Code X141 Teacher Training UCAS Code Not applicable QAA Subject Benchmarking Education Studies Group Professional Body Accreditation Education and Training Foundation Institute for Learning Date of course validation/review 1 July 2014 Date of Programme February 2014 Specification Admissions Requirements Normally those applying to join the Course will: 1) be regularly employed in the education or training of participants in the Lifelong Learning Sector for normally at least an average of 3 hours per week or 100 hours a year in an approved placement, with relevant Literacy and ESOL or Numeracy or Disability teaching practice; 2) have responsibility for the group that they are teaching for planning and assessing the learning.
    [Show full text]
  • London ESF Youth Programme Providers
    London ESF Youth Programme Providers Information is based on the latest data provided to the GLA. If you think the information here is incorrect please inform us by emailing: [email protected] Strand Contract Lead Lead Provider Contact Delivery Partner Name Contact Details (Name, email and phone no) Delivery Location(s) [email protected] Groundwork Big Creative Playback Studios Newham Council Newham College Barking & Dagenham, Enfield, Greenwich, Hackney, Haringey, Havering Think Forward Urban Futures REED in Partnership The Challenge NXG Preventative NEET North & North East Prevista Ameel Beshoori, [email protected] Cultural Capital Central Prevista Ameel Beshoori, [email protected] Groundowrk [email protected] Lewisham, Southwark, Lambeth, Wandsworth, Big Creative City of London, Westminster, Kensington & Chelsea, Camden and Islington The Write Time Playback Studios Think Forward PSEV NXG Inspirational Youth South Prevista Ameel Beshoori, [email protected] Groundwork Bexley, Bromley, Croydon, Sutton, Merton, The Write Time Kingston and Richmond [email protected] Playback Studios Prospects Richmond Council All Dimensions Barnet Brent Ealing Hammersmith & Fulham NXG Harrow Hillingdon Hounslow Cultural Capital West Prevista Ameel Beshoori, [email protected] Groundwork Playback Studios [email protected] Urban Futures PSEV REED in Partnership NEET Outreach North & North East Reed In Partnership Freddie Sumption, [email protected] City Gateway Katherine Brett, [email protected] Delivery:
    [Show full text]
  • Proposed College Merger Between HCUC (Harrow College & Uxbridge
    Proposed College Merger between HCUC (Harrow College & Uxbridge College) and Richmond upon Thames College FAQs 1. Why is the merger being considered? The merger proposal emerged from a robust Structure and Prospects Appraisal undertaken by the governing body of Richmond upon Thames College in conjunction with the Government’s Further Education Commissioner. The recommendation of this appraisal was that RuTC should merge with Harrow College and Uxbridge College (HCUC) to create a sustainable college group. We are confident that by joining forces we will be able to do more for our learners, and the delivery of a high-quality learner experience is at the centre of our proposals. Both HCUC and RuTC are committed to ensuring that the benefits to learners increase as a result of this merger, including a shared prioritising of students achieving more, progressing further and being more work ready. Through the merger the colleges will be “Better Together – Stronger Together”. 2. What are the benefits of merging? • Learner Experience - Current and new students can expect a new college partnership which recognises their individuality and provides a responsive and inspiring programme of study that enables them to progress on to new learning opportunities, university, apprenticeships or employment and supports them in achieving their ambitions. There will be an enhanced offer to students across all colleges, greater learning opportunities and more progression routes. • Quality - Excellent teaching and learning that delivers outstanding outcomes for our learners is at the heart of this merger proposal. By joining forces, we will have the combined strength, expertise and resources to accelerate the achievement of improved standards and we will be able to implement a programme of rapid quality improvement.
    [Show full text]
  • Waltham Forest College
    REPORT FROM THE INSPECTORATE Waltham Forest College June 1995 THE FURTHER EDUCATION FUNDING COUNCIL FEFC INSPECTION REPORT 86/95 WALTHAM FOREST COLLEGE GREATER LONDON REGION Inspected September 1994 – March 1995 Summary Waltham Forest College is a large general further education college which has good external links. It offers a wide range of vocational and academic courses to school leavers and adults. The college is effectively governed and managed, although the management structure within schools should be improved, and curriculum managers and tutors require access to better quality management information. There are effective arrangements for enrolment and induction but the college lacks standard procedures for admissions and pre-course assessment of students’ skills. High-quality information, guidance and counselling is available to students. Valuable additional support is provided in the English and mathematics workshop and students have access to good information technology facilities. The quality of tutorial support varies. There is some good teaching in almost all areas of the college’s work, but there are also a number of curriculum areas where standards need to be raised. Examination results on vocational courses are satisfactory but they are below average for GCE AS/A level courses and GCSE courses. The college is successful in enabling students to enter higher education, particularly from vocational and access courses. There is good practice in course review and evaluation. The college should improve retention and attendance rates and the levels of achievement on some courses; adopt a cross-college approach to developing good practice in tutorial work; develop the libraries as an effective resource for learning; and improve some aspects of its accommodation.
    [Show full text]
  • Pro-Bono-Forum-2014-10
    2014 EUROPEAN London PRO BONO The Mermaid 5-7 November FORUM ProgramB1_170x255mm_LONDON.indd 1 04/08/14 14:40 2014 European Pro Bono Forum 5–7 November The Mermaid London PILnet Sustaining Partners 2 l 2014 European Pro Bono Forum, London Photo l Nick Kenrick Welcome from PILnet As the European pro bono movement takes root around the world, PILnet brings its 2014 European Pro Bono Forum to London, a global legal capital about to celebrate the 800th anniversary of the Magna Carta. The London legal community has been a leader in the development of pro bono practice, and London is fertile ground for developing new approaches to strengthening the rule of law. But any conversation about pro bono in the U.K. must acknowledge recent cuts to legal aid that have left people across the country unable President to access the legal advice they need in order to secure justice. Many look to pro bono to fill the gap. But can it? Should it? A debate about these questions will kick off this year’s workshops. The Forum is our opportunity to re-think pro bono’s place within the panoply of legal solutions to our most pressing societal challenges. These challenges are not limited to the U.K., nor are they limited to problems of access to basic legal advice. Across Europe and beyond, we are experiencing new threats to privacy, freedom of association and the rights of LGBTI people. Climate change, immigration and global PILnet’s health issues also concern us all. We have endeavored to put together a rich program featuring front-line practitioners that will inspire us to engage on these issues and many others.
    [Show full text]
  • Open Letter to Address Systemic Racism in Further Education
    BLACK FURTHER EDUCATION LEADERSHIP GROUP 5th August 2020 Open letter to address systemic racism in further education Open letter to: Rt. Hon. Boris Johnson, Prime Minister, Rt. Hon. Gavin Williamson MP, Secretary of State for Education, funders of further education colleges; regulatory bodies & further education membership bodies. We, the undersigned, are a group of Black, Asian and Minority Ethnic (BAME) senior leaders, and allies, who work or have an interest in the UK further education (FE) sector. The recent #BlackLivesMatter (#BLM) global protest following the brutal murder of George Floyd compels us all to revisit how we address the pervasive racism that continues to taint and damage our society. The openness, solidarity and resolve stirred by #BLM is unprecedented and starkly exposes the lack of progress made in race equality since ‘The Stephen Lawrence Enquiry’. Against a background of raised concerns about neglect in healthcare, impunity of policing, cruelty of immigration systems – and in education, the erasure of history, it is only right for us to assess how we are performing in FE. Only by doing so, can we collectively address the barriers that our students, staff and communities face. The personal, economic and social costs of racial inequality are just too great to ignore. At a time of elevated advocacy for FE, failure to recognise the insidious nature of racism undermines the sector’s ability to fully engage with all its constituent communities. The supporting data and our lived experiences present an uncomfortable truth, that too many BAME students and staff have for far too long encountered a hostile environment and a system that places a ‘knee on our neck’.
    [Show full text]
  • Updated 2011/12 Allocation/Maximum Contract Value
    Skills Funding Agency Allocations 2011/12 as at 20 April 2012 Provider Provider Name Adult Skills 16-18 Adult Formal Additional 19+ Joint Employer *ESF Total UPIN Budget Apprenticeship Safeguarded First Step Learning Support Discretionary Investment Simplificatio 2011/12 2011/12 s 2011/12 Learning 2011/12 2011/12 (former Learner Support Programme n Pilot 2011/12 ALR ALS) 2011/12 2011/12 2011/12 105000 BARNFIELD COLLEGE £6,939,969 £1,400,991 £198,865 £0 £916,436 £440,173 £0 £0 £144,960 £10,041,394 105008 NACRO £566,737 £537,652 £0 £0 £0 £0 £0 £0 £868,461 £1,972,850 105010 NORTH HERTFORDSHIRE COLLEGE £9,729,688 £3,354,454 £0 £0 £595,579 £255,267 £0 £0 £954,750 £14,889,738 105017 CENTRAL BEDFORDSHIRE COLLEGE £3,469,386 £336,319 £40,016 £0 £284,133 £210,347 £0 £0 £0 £4,340,201 105019 AMERSHAM AND WYCOMBE COLLEGE £3,957,472 £324,469 £3,859 £28,698 £688,633 £117,960 £18,538 £0 £411,650 £5,551,279 105023 BERKSHIRE COLLEGE OF AGRICULTURE £885,269 £0 £5,002 £0 £43,052 £86,366 £0 £0 £0 £1,019,689 105024 BRACKNELL AND WOKINGHAM COLLEGE £2,836,426 £652,651 £365,732 £0 £146,429 £89,755 £0 £0 £0 £4,090,993 105028 THE HENLEY COLLEGE £595,279 £343,619 £41,079 £0 £117,132 £15,453 £0 £0 £0 £1,112,562 105032 NG BAILEY LIMITED £67,560 £443,136 £0 £0 £0 £0 £0 £0 £0 £510,696 105037 SPAN TRAINING & DEVELOPMENT LIMITED £315,173 £806,486 £0 £0 £0 £0 £0 £0 £0 £1,121,659 105041 PERTEMPS LEARNING AND EDUCATION ALLIANCE LIMITED £1,077,159 £27,811 £0 £0 £0 £0 £0 £0 £583,335 £1,688,305 105044 UK TRAINING & DEVELOPMENT LIMITED £459,558 £806,961 £0 £0 £0 £0 £0 £0 £0
    [Show full text]
  • London Borough of Lambeth
    LONDON BOROUGH OF LAMBETH LAMBETH ARCHIVES DEPARTMENT Reference number IV/224 Title Morley College Covering dates 1888-2013 Physical extent 29 boxes & 2 volumes Creator Morley College Administrative history Morley College originated in the work of the Coffee Music Halls Company Ltd. who promoted temperance and the arts in London. The college was established by Emma Cons, a visionary and social reformer who fought to improve standards of London’s Waterloo district. In 1880, Cons, with the support of the Coffee Music Halls Company Ltd. leased what is now known as the ‘Old Vic’ theatre and created the Royal Victoria Coffee and Music Hall. In 1882 the hall began to host weekly lectures in which eminent scientists would address the public on a wide range of topics. The success of these lectures led to the establishment of Morley Memorial College for working men and women, named after Samuel Morley, a textile manufacturer, MP and philanthropist who contributed to Morley College. In the 1920s the college moved to Westminster Bridge Road where it remains today although it has since expanded and now includes Morley Gallery and Arts Studio and the Nancy Seear Building. The college has attracted eminent staff including composer Gustav Holst, Director of Music 1907- 1924, a post later filled by Sir Michael Kemp Tippet, 1940-1951. Other high profile personalities associated with the college include composer Ralph Vaughn Williams, writer Virginia Woolf and artist David Hockney. Acquisition or transfer information Collection acquired by Lambeth Archives between 1999-2007 as a gift. Acquisition numbers: 1999/11, 2002/30, 2003/13, 2006/11, 2007/23; ARC/2013/6,8.
    [Show full text]
  • The Education (Listed Bodies) (Wales) Order 2007
    Status: This is the original version (as it was originally made). This item of legislation is currently only available in its original format. WELSH STATUTORY INSTRUMENTS 2007 No. 2794 (W.234) EDUCATION, WALES The Education (Listed Bodies) (Wales) Order 2007 Made - - - - 19 September 2007 Coming into force - - 1 October 2007 The Welsh Ministers, in exercise of the powers conferred upon the Secretary of State by sections 216(2) and 232(5) of the Education Reform Act 1988(1) and now vested in them(2), make the following Order: Title, commencement and application 1.—(1) The title of this Order is the Education (Listed Bodies) (Wales) Order 2007 and it comes into force on 1 October 2007. (2) This Order applies to Wales. Listed Bodies 2. The bodies that are specified in the Schedule to this Order comprise all those bodies that appear to the Welsh Ministers to fall for the time being within section 216(3) of the Education Reform Act 1988. Revocation 3. The Education (Listed Bodies) (Wales) Order 2004(3) and the Education (Listed Bodies) (Wales) (Amendment) Order 2005 are revoked(4). (1) 1988 c. 40. (2) By virtue of the National Assembly for Wales (Transfer of Functions) Order 1999 (SI 1999/672), and paragraph 30(1) and (2)(a) of Schedule 11 to the Government of Wales Act 2006. (3) SI 2004/3095. (4) SI 2005/1648. Document Generated: 2017-08-03 Status: This is the original version (as it was originally made). This item of legislation is currently only available in its original format. Jane E.
    [Show full text]
  • ANNUAL REPORT 2009 Index
    ANNUAL REPORT 2009 Index Free Representation Unit Annual Report to 31 March 2009 Page Chair’s Introduction 1 Case Studies 2-11 Trustees’ Report 12-16 Legal and Administrative Information 17 Independent Auditors’ Report 18 Statement of Financial Activities 19 Balance Sheet 20 Principal Accounting Policies 21 Notes to the Accounts 22-26 Donors 27-28 We are most grateful to Royle Financial Print Limited for their generous sponsorship of the costs of this annual report. The case studies on pages 2 to 11 show a few of our volunteer representatives (‘reps’) and tell the stories of some of the cases which they have handled. In those stories, the client names used are fictitious but do together give an indication of the gender and ethnic origin of our clients. The cover photograph is of FRU volunteer Sarah-Jane Smiles, who tells the story of one of her cases on page 10. Photograph by Patrick Barth © King’s College London. Chair’s Introduction As usual, Clive Tulloch has been so successful in providing “more volunteers are being recruited a link between staff and the management committee that it and more cases are being completed in becomes hard to see how FRU ever managed without him. both of the core areas of employment We are also grateful to our funders, without whom FRU would and social security law” not have achieved such an excellent set of financial results this year. Regrettably, this will not continue unless new sources FRU has enjoyed another successful year. A change to the of funding are found for the future, especially in these difficult ratification process has meant that more volunteers are being economic times.
    [Show full text]
  • The Reverend Professor June Boyce-Tillman MBE (FHEA, FRSA, LRAM, PGCE, BA Hons)
    - CURRICULUM VITAE - The Reverend Professor June Boyce-Tillman MBE (FHEA, FRSA, LRAM, PGCE, BA Hons) Academic & Professional Qualifications 1955 – 1962 Southampton Grammar School for Girls GCE A Level: Music (A) Latin (A) History (C) State Scholarship 1962 – 1965 St Hugh’s College, University of Oxford BA Honours Music Class II 1965 – 1966 Institute of Education, University of London PGCE Primary / Secondary 1976 LRAM (Piano Teaching) 1980 – 1986 Institute of Education, University of London (part-time) PhD Towards a model of the development of musical creativity: a study of the compositions of children aged 3-11. Employment & Other Professional Experience: Teaching 1966 – 67 Class Teacher with responsibility for Music, Southfields Junior Mixed School 1967 – 69 Class Teacher with responsibility for Music, Hogarth Junior Mixed School 1969 – 73 Head of Music Department, Burlington Grammar School for Girls 1971 – 90 General Musicianship Tutor, ILEA Centre for Young Musicians 1978 – 82 Tutor in charge of Piano Laboratory, Pimlico School 1978 – 90 Part-time Music Teacher, Furzedown Primary School 1985 – 90 Teacher / Tutor Primary PGCE, London University Institute of Education 1986 – 90 Part-time Music Teacher (GCSE), Graveney Comprehensive School 1990 - Various, The University of Winchester (formerly King Alfred’s College): The University of Winchester Position Senior Lecturer in Music Principal Lecturer and Reader in Music Principal Lecturer and Reader in Community & Performing Arts Professor of Applied Music Teaching Areas BA Primary Education:
    [Show full text]