Air/Rail Intermodality – Recent Experiences from Germany

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Air/Rail Intermodality – Recent Experiences from Germany RESEARCH Air/Rail Intermodality – Recent Experiences from Germany This paper tries to explore recent developments in Germany, where an integrated intermodal product, the so-called AIRail, offers unique service features, like integrated ticketing and baggage handling, which is so far only known in the air transport industry.A new approach to integrate air and rail servic- es was undertaken with AIRail, which has achieved considerable success so far, as more than 170,000 passengers per year use this service. Characteristics and advantages of AIRail will be explored in the rest of the paper, but also shortcomings and challenges that can be identified. Furthermore, special attention will be given to the impact of high-speed train services between Frankfurt and Cologne on air services between these cities. By Wolfgang Grimme Background Airport Express”, as early as 1982 inaugurated several months before, To increase the benefits of the trans- (until 1993), connecting both which reduced travel time between port system or infrastructure, policy- Düsseldorf (via Cologne) and Stuttgart both cities tremendously. The service makers often demand a better integra- with Frankfurt Airport. These services features integrated ticketing and bag- tion of the various modes of trans- were discontinued for several reasons, gage handling. The latter point is par- portation. For environmental reasons the most notable probably being con- ticularly important to gain passenger and to relieve congested airports, a siderable increases of leasing rates by acceptance for rail services. With shift of short-distance feeder air serv- the train operator, which Lufthansa AIRail, baggage is checked through ices to rail is a frequently expressed was not willing to pay. Another prob- from the Lufthansa-branded check-in objective in transport policy. However, lem was the difficulty to achieve a counter in Cologne or Stuttgart main as a prerequisite to the market success high load factor of a fully dedicated station directly to the final destination of such ideas, it is necessary that rail train, which offered only few daily fre- and vice versa. transport providers offer attractive quencies and considerably longer jour- products for passengers to create an ney times than air travel. However, this service is particularly incentive to choose rail services over challenging for the participating serv- short-distance air services. Forced A new approach to integrate air and ice providers for several reasons. First, modal shifts by command-and-control rail services was undertaken with the new ICE 3 high-speed trains do not regulatory instruments are incompati- AIRail, which has achieved consider- feature baggage compartments. ble with liberal market economy able success so far, as more than Therefore, a passenger compartment is regimes. They tend to reduce con- 170,000 passengers per year use this converted in a “quick change” config- sumer welfare and should therefore be service. Characteristics and advan- uration to carry baggage on the AIRail abandoned in favor of more market- tages of AIRail will be explored in the segment of the journey, which is asso- oriented measures. The attractiveness rest of the paper, but also shortcom- ciated with a loss of 10 seats that could of intermodal products has to be ings and challenges that can be identi- otherwise be used for paying passen- increased with regards to both price fied. Furthermore, special attention gers. The second challenge is associat- and journey time, as well as conven- will be given to the impact of high- ed with Deutsche Bahn’s very dense ience. speed train services between Frankfurt and synchronized timetable, requiring and Cologne on air services between the loading and unloading of baggage This paper tries to explore recent these cities. during the brief stops not to exceed 4 developments in Germany, where an minutes. Baggage is transported in integrated intermodal product, the so- AIRail Service Characteristics closed containers on wheels from the called AIRail, offers unique service AIRail, jointly developed by Deutsche platform at Frankfurt Airport to securi- features, like integrated ticketing and Bahn, Lufthansa and Fraport, can be ty screening and the baggage handling baggage handling, which is so far only considered as the most advanced inter- system which was extended for this known in the air transport industry. modal product available to travelers in purpose into the airport’s new long- The idea, however, to operate a train Germany, if not in Europe. It was distance train station. Thirdly, baggage with the service characteristics of air introduced on the route between of passengers who started their jour- transport is not new. Deutsche Frankfurt Airport and Stuttgart in ney outside Germany is required to be Bundesbahn operated a dedicated train March 2001 and between Frankfurt cleared by customs. For this purpose, service on behalf of Deutsche Airport and Cologne in May 2003 small customs offices have been set up Lufthansa, the so-called “Lufthansa after the high-speed train line had been at the train stations of Cologne and Aerlines Magazine e-zine edition, Issue 34 1 Stuttgart, so passengers can clear their which have made AIRail a well- flights prefer air transport due to bet- baggage directly at the train station. accepted alternative to feeder flights, ter accessibility of the airports of there are also a number of challenges Cologne and Stuttgart by car and due A total of 15 regular trains per day in and problems associated with the to lower parking fees at the airports each direction between Frankfurt service. First, it is a rather complicat- than at the main train stations. As Airport and Cologne are designated as ed and costly process when a foreign both Cologne/Bonn and Frankfurt AIRail trains as well as 7 trains airline wants to make use of the Airport are directly connected by between Stuttgart and Frankfurt AIRail service. Interested airlines high-speed train this may lead to the Airport, therefore offering passengers have to apply for approval at their idea to offer AIRail from a wide range of frequencies, resulting home country’s civil aviation author- Cologne/Bonn Airport instead of or in in reduced waiting time for connecting ity, as AIRail is a deviation from stan- addition to the services from the main flights. On average, about 31 seats in dard security procedures found in train station. Apart from increased 2nd class for economy class passen- international aviation. Second, AIRail customer acceptance this would also gers and 6 seats in 1st class for busi- cannot be booked on Lufthansa’s own help to save costs as check-in and ness and first class passengers are website caused by technical problems customs facilities are already avail- reserved on each train designated as with the booking engine of able at the airport. However, this AIRail service. In total, this results in Lufthansa. This inadvertently creates would require an increase in train fre- an available AIRail capacity of 555 incentives for internet users to book a quencies between the two airports seats per day or about 200,000 seats feeder flight instead of the AIRail from its three services daily at the per year on the Cologne-Frankfurt service. This fact becomes even more moment of which two are operated route, with slightly less than half of curious as it is possible to book very early in the morning and one this quantity for the Stuttgart- AIRail on other internet-based travel very late in the evening. It may be Frankfurt route. The “blocked space” agents such as Opodo. Third, it is sufficient to offer four daily services, agreement of Lufthansa with Deutsche rather difficult for foreign travel equal to the current number of flights Bahn has evident advantages over the agents, who are not familiar with the which could arrive at/depart from lease and operation of a complete train different intermodal products avail- Frankfurt Airport synchronized with as it was done with the “Lufthansa able in Germany, to identify the serv- Lufthansa’s flight banks. Airport Express” from 1982 to 1993. ice characteristics of AIRail in com- On the one hand, it is possible to offer parison to other intermodal products, Case study: more frequencies and on the other most notably code-share agreements Impacts of the high-speed rail- hand, it is less difficult to achieve that Deutsche Bahn maintains with way line on air services between higher load factors. Moreover, the American Airlines, All Nippon Cologne and Frankfurt agreement between Deutsche Bahn Airways, China Airlines and TAP The city pair Cologne-Frankfurt seems and Lufthansa is flexible so that the Portugal. While code-share services to be a perfect example for the benefits number of available seats can be include more destinations than of a shift from short distance air serv- adapted to demand on short notice. AIRail, these services do not feature ices to railway. Since 2002 Germany’s through-baggage handling and are fastest high-speed line has reduced The AIRail service is not limited to therefore less attractive for passen- railway travel times from Cologne passengers traveling on Lufthansa. A gers. Traditional booking engines and main station to Frankfurt Airport from total of 27 other airlines have agree- computer reservation systems are not two hours to 50 minutes. Comparing ments with Lufthansa to use the able to display additional information this to the travel time by air, taking AIRail service to feed passengers to about the exact service characteristics into account the time needed for the of code-share trains. Although it transfer to the airport, for check-in, Frankfurt Airport. For the participat- seems that these challenges may be security checks, boarding, the actual ing airlines, this service has clear overcome quite easily, they are, in flight and deboarding it seemed ques- advantages, as they do not have to pro- fact, rooted in an incompatibility of tionable if there was a future for air vide own check-in agents at the train the information technology systems services on this city pair.
Recommended publications
  • Surface Access Integrated Ticketing Report May 2018 1
    SURFACE ACCESS INTEGRATED TICKETING REPORT MAY 2018 1. Contents 1. Executive Summary 3 1.1. Introduction 3 1.2. Methodology 3 1.3. Current Practice 4 1.4. Appetite and Desire 5 1.5. Barriers 5 1.6. Conclusions 6 2. Introduction 7 3. Methodology 8 4. Current Practice 9 4.1. Current Practice within the Aviation Sector in the UK 11 4.2. Experience from Other Modes in the UK 15 4.3. International Comparisons 20 5. Appetite and Desire 25 5.1. Industry Appetite Findings 25 5.2. Passenger Appetite Findings 26 5.3. Passenger Appetite Summary 30 6. Barriers 31 6.1. Commercial 32 6.2. Technological 33 6.3. Regulatory 34 6.4. Awareness 35 6.5. Cultural/Behavioural 36 7. Conclusions 37 8. Appendix 1 – About the Authors 39 9. Appendix 2 – Bibliography 40 10. Appendix 3 – Distribution & Integration Methods 43 PAGE 2 1. Executive Summary 1.1. Introduction This report examines air-to-surface access integrated ticketing in support of one of the Department for Transport’s (DfT) six policy objectives in the proposed new avia- tion strategy – “Helping the aviation industry work for its customers”. Integrated Ticketing is defined as the incorporation of one ticket that includes sur- face access to/from an airport and the airplane ticket itself using one transaction. Integrated ticketing may consider surface access journeys both to the origin airport and from the destination airport. We recognise that some of the methods of inte- grated ticketing might not be truly integrated (such as selling rail or coach tickets on board the flight), but such examples were included in the report to reflect that these exist and that the customer experience in purchasing is relatively seamless.
    [Show full text]
  • Rail Deregulation in Europe, and Prospects of Air Rail Integration Nathalie Lenoir, Isabelle Laplace
    Rail deregulation in Europe, and prospects of air rail integration Nathalie Lenoir, Isabelle Laplace To cite this version: Nathalie Lenoir, Isabelle Laplace. Rail deregulation in Europe, and prospects of air rail integration. ATRS 2006, Air Transport Research Society World Conference, May 2006, Nagoya, Japan. pp xxxx. hal-01021781 HAL Id: hal-01021781 https://hal-enac.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-01021781 Submitted on 15 Jul 2014 HAL is a multi-disciplinary open access L’archive ouverte pluridisciplinaire HAL, est archive for the deposit and dissemination of sci- destinée au dépôt et à la diffusion de documents entific research documents, whether they are pub- scientifiques de niveau recherche, publiés ou non, lished or not. The documents may come from émanant des établissements d’enseignement et de teaching and research institutions in France or recherche français ou étrangers, des laboratoires abroad, or from public or private research centers. publics ou privés. Rail deregulation in Europe, and prospects of air-rail integration Lenoir Nathalie Aviation Economics and Econometrics Laboratory Ecole nationale de l’Aviation Civile 7 av. E. Belin, BP 54005 31 055 Toulouse cedex 4, France 33 5 62 17 40 50/ 17 [email protected] Isabelle LAPLACE, M3 SYSTEMS, 31 410 Lavernose, France 33 5 6 23 17 35 [email protected], Preliminary Draft1 Do not quote We are looking into the evolution of cooperation and competition between airlines and railroads, in the context of rail deregulation, with the tools provided by network economics. After looking at the progress of rail deregulation in Europe, we describe the situation of air and rail in terms of cooperation (intermodality).
    [Show full text]
  • INTERCONNECT Interconnection Between Short- and Long-Distance Transport Networks
    INTERCONNECT INTERCONNECTion Between Short- and Long-Distance Transport Networks INTERCONNECT DELIVERABLE D3.1 AN ANALYSIS OF POTENTIAL SOLUTIONS FOR IMPROVING INTERCONNECTIVITY OF PASSENGER NETWORKS Main Author: Institute for Transport Studies Dissemination: Partners and Project Officer Project co-funded by the European Commission within the Seventh Framework Programme, Theme 7 Transport Contract number 233846 Project Start Date: 1 June 2009, Project Duration: 24 months POTENTIAL SOLUTIONS Document Control Sheet Project Number: 019746 Project Acronym: INTERCONNECT Workpackage: Potential Solutions Version: V1.1 Document History: Version Issue Date Distribution V0.2 1 March 2011 Peer reviewer and consortium V1.0 31 March 2011 Consortium, Project Officer V1.1 14 June 2011 Classification – This report is: Draft Final X Confidential Restricted Public X Partners Owning: All Main Editor: Peter Bonsall (Institute for Transport Studies, University of Leeds) Abrantes, P., Matthews, B., Shires J. (ITS), Bielefeldt, C. (TRI), Schnell, Partners Contributed: O., Mandel, B. (MKm), de Stasio, C., Maffii, S. (TRT), Bak, M. Borkowski, P. and Pawlowska, B. (UG). Made Available To: All INTERCONNECT Partners / Project Officer Bonsall, P., Abrantes, P., Bak, M., Bielefeldt, C., Borkowski, P., Maffii, This document should S., Mandel, B., Matthews, B., Shires, J., Pawlowska, B., Schnell, O., be referenced as: and de Stasio, C. “Deliverable 3.1: An Analysis of Potential Solutions for Improving Interconnectivity of Passenger Networks”, WP3, INTERCONNECT, Co-funded
    [Show full text]
  • FRA Booklet "By Train to Your Plane" | Fraport AG
    Services By train to your Post Rollstuhl Geldwechsel Post office Wheelchairs Currency exchange plane Snacks Bar Supermarkt Conveniently get to the airport by rail Snack bar Café Supermarket Med. Dienste Apotheke Babyraum Med. services Pharmacy Baby room Spielplatz WLAN-Zone Gebetsraum Play area Wi-Fi zone Prayer room Dusche Raucherzone Lounges Showers Smoking area Lounge Basics Abflug Ankunft Schalter Rolltreppe Treppe Lift The information in this brochure is current as of February 2015 Departures Arrivals Counters Escalator Stairs Elevator Fraport AG, Frankfurt Airport Services Worldwide 60547 Frankfurt am Main, Germany Bordkarten- Gepäckannahme Passkontrolle Sky Line Fundbüro AiRail-Terminal Steffen Sommer, Corporate Communications kontrolle Check-in Passport check SkyLine train Lost & found AiRail terminal Boarding pass check Phone: +49 (0)180—6 FRAINFO* +49 (0)180—6 372 4636* YOUTUBE LOGO SPECS PRINT on light backgrounds on dark backgrounds standard standard main red gradient bottom www.frankfurt-airport.com Mietwagen Taxi Parken Hotel Treffpunkt Telefon PMS 1795C PMS 1815C C0 M96 Y90 K2 C13 M96 Y81 K54 Car rentals Taxis Parking Hotel Meeting point Telephone white black WHITE BLACK no gradients no gradients C0 M0 Y0 K0 C100 M100 Y100 K100 www.twitter.com/Airport_FRA watermark watermark www.facebook.com/FrankfurtAirport stacked logo (for sharing only) stacked logo (for sharing only) www.youtube.com/user/FraportundFra Bahnhof Bus Polizei Airport Toiletten Information Train station Buses Police Conference Restrooms Information www.pinterest.com/AirportFRA
    [Show full text]
  • International Lessons for Promoting Transit Connections to High-Speed Rail Systems
    MTI Funded by U.S. Department of Services Transit Census California of Water 2012 Transportation and California International Lessons for Department of Transportation Promoting Transit Connections to High-Speed Rail Systems MTI ReportMTI 12-02 December 2012 MTI Report 12-53 MINETA TRANSPORTATION INSTITUTE MTI FOUNDER Hon. Norman Y. Mineta The Mineta Transportation Institute (MTI) was established by Congress in 1991 as part of the Intermodal Surface Transportation Equity Act (ISTEA) and was reauthorized under the Transportation Equity Act for the 21st century (TEA-21). MTI then successfully MTI BOARD OF TRUSTEES competed to be named a Tier 1 Center in 2002 and 2006 in the Safe, Accountable, Flexible, Efficient Transportation Equity Act: A Legacy for Users (SAFETEA-LU). Most recently, MTI successfully competed in the Surface Transportation Extension Act of 2011 to Founder, Honorable Norman Joseph Boardman (Ex-Officio) Diane Woodend Jones (TE 2016) Michael Townes* (TE 2017) be named a Tier 1 Transit-Focused University Transportation Center. The Institute is funded by Congress through the United States Mineta (Ex-Officio) Chief Executive Officer Principal and Chair of Board Senior Vice President Department of Transportation’s Office of the Assistant Secretary for Research and Technology (OST-R), University Transportation Secretary (ret.), US Department of Amtrak Lea+Elliot, Inc. Transit Sector, HNTB Transportation Centers Program, the California Department of Transportation (Caltrans), and by private grants and donations. Vice Chair Anne Canby (TE 2017) Will Kempton (TE 2016) Bud Wright (Ex-Officio) Hill & Knowlton, Inc. Director Executive Director Executive Director OneRail Coalition Transportation California American Association of State The Institute receives oversight from an internationally respected Board of Trustees whose members represent all major surface Honorary Chair, Honorable Bill Highway and Transportation Officials transportation modes.
    [Show full text]
  • Strategic Formation and Welfare Effects of Airline-High Speed Rail Agreements
    Transportation Research Part B 117 (2018) 393–411 Contents lists available at ScienceDirect Transportation Research Part B journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/trb Strategic formation and welfare effects of airline-high speed rail agreements ∗ Alessandro Avenali a, Valentina Bracaglia b, Tiziana D’Alfonso a, , Pierfrancesco Reverberi a a Department of Computer, Control, and Management Engineering Antonio Ruberti, Sapienza University of Rome, Via Ariosto 25, Rome 00185, Italy b Autostrade per l’Italia S.p.A., Via A. Bergamini 50, Rome 00159, Italy a r t i c l e i n f o a b s t r a c t Article history: Policy makers encourage airline-high speed rail (HSR) cooperation to promote intermodal Received 31 May 2017 passenger transport. We study the strategic formation of airline-HSR partnerships (depend- Revised 3 August 2018 ing on sunk costs and firms’ bargaining power) and their effects on consumer surplus and Accepted 4 September 2018 social welfare. We assume that airline-HSR agreements serve to offer a bundle of domes- tic HSR and international air services. In a capacity purchase (CP) agreement, the airline Keywords: buys train seats to sell the bundle, whereas in a joint venture (JV) agreement firms cre- Airline-high speed rail cooperation ate a distinct business unit. We find that both agreements increase traffic in the network, Airport congestion and thereby may not reduce congestion at hub airports. We provide antitrust authorities Capacity purchase agreements with a simple two-tier test for the CP agreement to improve consumer surplus. Contrary Joint venture agreements to airline-HSR mergers, the JV agreement benefits consumers independent of hub conges- Competition policy tion and mode substitution.
    [Show full text]
  • Promoting Intermodal Connectivity at California's High-Speed Rail Stations
    MTI Funded by U.S. Department of Services Transit Census California of Water 2012 Transportation and California Promoting Intermodal Department of Transportation Connectivity at California’s High-Speed Rail Stations MTI ReportMTI 12-02 MTI Report 12-47 December 2012 MINETA TRANSPORTATION INSTITUTE MTI FOUNDER Hon. Norman Y. Mineta The Mineta Transportation Institute (MTI) was established by Congress in 1991 as part of the Intermodal Surface Transportation Equity Act (ISTEA) and was reauthorized under the Transportation Equity Act for the 21st century (TEA-21). MTI then successfully MTI BOARD OF TRUSTEES competed to be named a Tier 1 Center in 2002 and 2006 in the Safe, Accountable, Flexible, Efficient Transportation Equity Act: A Legacy for Users (SAFETEA-LU). Most recently, MTI successfully competed in the Surface Transportation Extension Act of 2011 to Founder, Honorable Norman Joseph Boardman (Ex-Officio) Diane Woodend Jones (TE 2016) Michael Townes* (TE 2017) be named a Tier 1 Transit-Focused University Transportation Center. The Institute is funded by Congress through the United States Mineta (Ex-Officio) Chief Executive Officer Principal and Chair of Board Senior Vice President Department of Transportation’s Office of the Assistant Secretary for Research and Technology (OST-R), University Transportation Secretary (ret.), US Department of Amtrak Lea+Elliot, Inc. Transit Sector, HNTB Transportation Centers Program, the California Department of Transportation (Caltrans), and by private grants and donations. Vice Chair Anne Canby (TE 2017) Will Kempton (TE 2016) Bud Wright (Ex-Officio) Hill & Knowlton, Inc. Director Executive Director Executive Director OneRail Coalition Transportation California American Association of State The Institute receives oversight from an internationally respected Board of Trustees whose members represent all major surface Honorary Chair, Honorable Bill Highway and Transportation Officials transportation modes.
    [Show full text]
  • Towards Passenger Intermodality in the EU
    Towards Passenger Intermodality in the EU Report 2 (final version) Analysis of the National Inventories on Passenger Intermodality for the EUROPEAN COMMISSION DG ENERGY AND TRANSPORT Unit G 3 Motorways of the Sea and Intermodality Dortmund, October 2004 Towards Passenger Intermodality in the EU Report 2 – National Inventories Project Team Institut für Landes- und Stadtentwicklungsforschung und Bauwesen des Landes Nordrhein-Westfalen (ILS NRW) Research Institute for Regional and Urban Development, Building and Construction of the Federal State of North Rhine-Westphalia Deutsche Straße 5 D-44339 Dortmund Germany Tel.: + 49 2 31 / 90 51-268 Fax: + 49 2 31 / 90 51-280 E-Mail: [email protected] URL: www.ils.nrw.de Guido Müller (Co-ordinator) Sebastian Bührmann Babtie spol. Prague, Czech Republic URL: www.babtie.cz Paul Riley Hywel Wyn Rowlands Langzaam Verkeer Leuven, Belgium URL: www.langzaamverkeer.be Tim Asperges Veerle Beyst Geert Claessens Liesbeth Reekmans Ilse Vleugels ETT Madrid, Spain URL: www.ett.es Pedro Puig-Pey Alicia Garcia de Miguel Paul Holloway Towards Passenger Intermodality in the EU Report 2 – National Inventories Table of Contents Executive Summary..............................................................................................4 1. Introduction ......................................................................................................1 1.1 AIM ...........................................................................................................1 1.2 METHODOLOGY ...........................................................................................2
    [Show full text]
  • Factors of Air-Rail Passenger Intermodality
    Factors of air-rail passenger intermodality Joana Duarte Costa Dissertation submitted for obtaining the degree of Master in Territory Engineering Dissertation committee President: Professor Doutor Rui Manuel Moura de Carvalho Oliveira Supervisor: Professora Doutora Maria do Rosário Maurício Ribeiro Macário Member: Prof. João António de Abreu e Silva October 2012 Abstract European transport policy promotes intermodality as a means of improving efficiency and sustainability. This study looks into passenger air-rail intermodality at airports which are directly integrated into long-distance rail networks and focuses on intermodal journeys in which the rail trip doesn’t serve the purpose of city-centre to nearby airport access, but rather makes up a substantial leg of the journey, potentially substituting short-haul air feeders and expanding airport catchment areas. Air-rail intermodality projects involve considerable capital and operating costs and require ambitious goals and strong cooperation among actors. Although best practice guidelines exist for intermodality in general, there doesn’t seem to be one best solution for air-rail intermodality success. By examining literature, European intermodal products and rail stations at airports, we propose five critical success factors: infrastructure integration, network context, overall travel time and transfer time, integrated ticketing and information. Governance factors were also found to be a key determinant of success for planning, implementing and operating these multi-operator projects which require high levels of coordination. Case studies examined best practice (Frankfurt airport) and compared a successful case with one which is not so successful (Paris-CDG versus Lyon Saint-Exupéry). Result transferability to Portugal was analyzed, focusing on Lisbon airport.
    [Show full text]
  • 2001 Annual Report
    Record High in Passenger Transport At 74.5 billion pkm, passenger transport performance showed a slight increase over the previous year’s record result – even though EXPO services were discontinued. We once again gained market share. Positive Development in Revenues Despite the difficult economic environ- ment, we were able to increase revenues Deutsche Bahn AG by 1.7% to € 15.7 billion in 2001. Potsdamer Platz 2 D-10785 Berlin Germany Annual Report 2001 Restructuring, Performance, Growth http://www.bahn.de We have a clear strategy and an intensive capital expenditures program for modernizing Deutsche Bahn and getting it in shape for the future. Deutsche Bahn AG Annual Report 2001 185mm 216mm 10,5mm 216mm 185mm Record High in Passenger Transport At 74.5 billion pkm, passenger transport performance showed a slight increase over the previous year’s record result – even though EXPO services were discontinued. We once again gained market share. Positive Development in Revenues Despite the difficult economic environ- ment, we were able to increase revenues Deutsche Bahn AG by 1.7% to € 15.7 billion in 2001. Potsdamer Platz 2 D-10785 Berlin Germany Annual Report 2001 Restructuring, Performance, Growth http://www.bahn.de We have a clear strategy and an intensive capital expenditures program for modernizing Deutsche Bahn and getting it in shape for the future. Deutsche Bahn AG Annual Report 2001 185mm 216mm 10,5mm 216mm 185mm DB Group: An Overview Eight-Year-Summary Management Board Deutsche Bahn Group Eight-Year-Summary Key figures Change in €
    [Show full text]
  • Integrated Ticketing on Long-Distance Passenger Transport Services
    DIRECTORATE GENERAL FOR INTERNAL POLICIES POLICY DEPARTMENT B: STRUCTURAL AND COHESION POLICIES TRANSPORT AND TOURISM INTEGRATED TICKETING ON LONG-DISTANCE PASSENGER TRANSPORT SERVICES STUDY This document was requested by the European Parliament's Committee on Transport and Tourism. AUTHORS TRT Trasporti e Territorio - Silvia MAFFII, Alessio SITRAN, Marco BRAMBILLA, Angelo MARTINO MKmetric - Dr. Benedikt MANDEL, Oliver SCHNELL RESPONSIBLE ADMINISTRATOR Marc THOMAS Policy Department B: Structural and Cohesion Policies European Parliament B-1047 Brussels E-mail: [email protected] EDITORIAL ASSISTANT Nora RÉVÉSZ LINGUISTIC VERSIONS Original: EN. Translation: FR. ABOUT THE PUBLISHER To contact the Policy Department or to subscribe to its monthly newsletter please write to: [email protected] Manuscript completed in August 2012. Brussels, © European Union, 2012. This document is available on the Internet at: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/studies DISCLAIMER The opinions expressed in this document are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily represent the official position of the European Parliament. Reproduction and translation for non-commercial purposes are authorized, provided the source is acknowledged and the publisher is given prior notice and sent a copy. DIRECTORATE GENERAL FOR INTERNAL POLICIES POLICY DEPARTMENT B: STRUCTURAL AND COHESION POLICIES TRANSPORT AND TOURISM INTEGRATED TICKETING ON LONG-DISTANCE PASSENGER TRANSPORT SERVICES STUDY Abstract This study deals with the issue
    [Show full text]
  • Flugplan Timetable
    Flugplan Passagier- und Frachtflüge Timetable Passenger and Cargo Flights 25.10. – 31.12.2015 Leitwerke Leitwerke Plane Tail Fins Plane Tail Fins Lufthansa British Airways Air Berlin Star Alliance (UA) KLM Swiss Singapore Airlines South African Air France Cathay Pacific Air India Austrian Airlines Turkish Airlines Qatar Airways SAS American Airlines Air China Alitalia ANA Emirates Iberia Condor Japan Airlines Thai Airways Delta Air Lines Etihad Asiana China Airlines TAM TuiFly Gulf Air Saudia Korean Air Finnair Air Canada Aeroflot Oman Air China Eastern Royal Jordanian TAP Lan Airlines CSA Air Malta Air Namibia Air Serbia Vietnam Airlines Atlas Air Air Bridge Ethiopian El Al LOT EgyptAir AeroLogic China Southern Fedex MNG Airlines Inhalt/Contents Nachrichten/News 2 –8 Wegweiser/Airport Guide Übersichtsplan Terminals/Terminal Plan 10 – 11 Airline-Verzeichnis/Airline Register 12 – 15 Reiseveranstalter/Travel Agencies 16 – 17 Lounges 18 Übersichtsplan CargoCity/Map of CargoCity 20 – 21 Passagierflüge/Passenger Flights 22 – 62 Anmerkungen Passagierflüge/Remarks Passenger Flights 63 – 64 Frachtflüge/Cargo Flights 66 – 77 Anmerkungen Frachtflüge/Remarks Cargo Flights 78 Informationen/Information Flugzeugtypen/Aircraft Types 52 – 53 IATA-Codes der Fluggesellschaften/IATA Airline Codes 79 Wichtige Telefonnummern/Important Telephone Numbers 80 Telefonnummern der CargoCity/Telephone Numbers CargoCity 81 Büros der Fluggesellschaften/Airline Offices 82 – 86 Hier ist die Kranich-Flotte zu Hause/ Home Base for the Lufthansa Fleet 88 Internet-Service/Internet
    [Show full text]