DOCSLIB.ORG

Discomforting Power: Bodies in Public

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Discomforting Power: Bodies in Public Discomforting Power: Bodies in Public By © 2017 Ashley Mog M.A., University of Kansas, 2015 M.Sc., London School of Economics and Political Science, 2010 B.A., University of Washington, 2008 Submitted to the graduate degree program in Women, Gender, and Sexuality Studies and the Graduate Faculty of the University of Kansas in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy. Chair: Sherrie Tucker Hannah Britton Giselle Anatol Ben Chappell Alison Kafer Date Defended: 10 April 2017 The dissertation committee for Ashley Mog certifies that this is the approved version of the following dissertation: Discomforting Power: Bodies in Public Chair: Sherrie Tucker Date Approved: 4 May 2017 ii Abstract In this work, I draw from oral history interviews with queer and trans disability justice activists in Seattle, WA. I posit a theory of comfort that interrogates how “being comfortable” in certain spaces gets allocated on the basis of social privilege. I argue that comfort is only bestowed on and felt by some bodies, often at the expense of others. Who gets to be comfortable? And how is the feeling of comfort or the feeling of discomfort differently experienced based upon one’s social status and embodied identity? When does comfort get noticed and when does it go unnoticed? When does comfort become coded? I posit that terms like “safety,” “privacy,” and “cleanliness” become code words for comfort in some contexts, especially concerning public bathrooms. I move from broad accounts of discourses around public bathrooms to particular fears, events, and lenses. My interlocutors discuss their experiences of avoiding drinking water, facing possible violence, peeing on themselves and taking extra clothes everywhere as a result of lack of accessible bathrooms, facing illness from chemicals in the bathrooms, and staying out of public because of the problems with public bathrooms. I interrogate the implications of the construction of comfort for activism, organizing, and identity, arguing that comfort becomes an oppressive and defining force that is used as a weapon against marginalized people. iii Acknowledgments I have so many people to thank for their support, generosity, and labor that got me to this point. Firstly, Sherrie Tucker, my advisor, mentor, and friend – thank you for believing in me when I did not and for your pep talks with awesome running metaphors. You pushed me theoretically and my work is so much stronger for it. Taking that oral history class with you and Tami challenged me in important ways that gave me the confidence to go out there and talk to people about their stories! Additionally, your support has helped me get through some difficult times in graduate school and I cannot share my appreciation enough. Hannah Britton, thank you for seeing something in me in Feminist Theory class, for telling me when I needed to dive deeper into my intellectual lines of thinking, and for pushing me to dream big. Giselle Anatol, it was so wonderful to work with you in the Hall Center Faculty Colloquium, I have learned so much from you about shaping a story and exploring the power of words. Working with you on our projects in the colloquium was so valuable for shaping my intellectual commitments. Ben Chappell, I really appreciate how you lead me to critical geography and the generosity with which you offered me suggestions for my work. Alison Kafer, thank you for being my Disability Studies mentor and for sharing your thoughts, insights, and critiques with me. You really formed how I see myself contributing to crip theory and DS. Amanda Swarr, thank you for encouraging me to apply to grad school in the first place and for your continued mentorship. Dave Tell, thank you for leading me down the comfort line of thinking and for teaching me everything I know about Foucault. To Tami Albin, I literally would not have gotten through graduate school without you. Thank you for all of the hours you spent helping me conceptualize what I am doing in academia and why it is important. Thank you for pushing me to think about my work both in theory and iv practice, helping me figure out how and what to research, and for your generous friendship and support. I want to express my gratitude to WGSS for three years of funding. Thank you to Jan Emerson, who keeps the department together and patiently helped me with administration obstacles along the way. To Alesha Doan, who was the chair for much of my time in the department, thank you for believing in me, supporting me throughout my graduate career, and for working tirelessly to find us all more funding support. To the American Association of University Women, thank you for the dissertation completion fellowship that helped me get this done! I was lucky to be able to finish my oral histories with the help of the AAUW, Re:Gender’s Mariam K. Chamberlain award, and the Jim Martin Travel Award from the Hall Center for the Humanities at KU. Through the Hall Center for the Humanities’ Fall Faculty Colloquium on Decolonizing Knowledge in 2014 I was able to sort out my theoretical commitments, thank you all of the wonderful and smart faculty that were involved. Thank you also to Glenn Adams and Byron Caminero-Santangelo for organizing the colloquium and for inviting me to be a part of it. Thank you to the Center for the Study of Women, Gender, and Sexuality at Rice University for hosting me as a visiting scholar for a year! To my grad school colleagues and friends – Corinne, thank you for being the best cohort mate I could have wished for. Thank you for reading grant applications, for being a teaching sounding board, and for 715 happy hours. Liam, thank you for everything, for the kikis, the nights drinking whiskey and talking about work, for tattoo friendship, for perfecting the art of happy hour, and for helping LFK be delightfully queer. Liz, my favorite Leo, thank you for feeding me, for proofreading and commenting on my work, and for being a steadfast, fierce, and v supportive friend. Andrew Gilbert, I thank you for the generative chats we’ve had together about theory, astrology, yoga, and video games. I appreciate your Aries friendship and understanding and miss our yoga mornings. Team Hustle – thank you for the life giving exchanges about life, love, and academic issues. Cat, it has been so fun visiting you all the places you have lived and had fancy jobs. You are so funny and fun, thanks for all of your encouragement along the way. To Trevor, thank you for the PLL chats, drag race gossip, and life giving chats about theory and pop culture. Steph and Eric, the Krehbiel-C’wiens family, thank you for feeding me, for your love and support, and for hours of fun watching dancing videos, foraging, and sharing Buffy feelings. Oniel, I miss singing Macy Gray songs with you and dreaming of different futures, thank you for your friendship. I miss TTAG! Caleb, thank you for all the chats about how messed up the world is and for your friendship and solidarity. You all made Lawrence a loving and fun place to live. To Sveta, it was wonderful living with you that year in Houston, thank you for your poetic turns of phrase, fun cooking collaborations, and always being down to watch a dancing movie. To my disability studies people – Mike Gill, Eungung Kim, Alison Kafer, Katerina Kolarova, Aly Patsavas, Ally Day, Angela Carter, Krystal Cleary, Hailee Yoshizaki Gibbons – thank you for welcoming me in, showing me what it means to be in community, making amazing scholarship that greatly influences me, and for being brilliant colleagues that I look forward to talking to at every conference! To my wonderful Seattle friends, you helped me feel anchored through some of the hardest times in my graduate program. To Emerson, my dear friend of so many years, thank you for your constant love, support, and fierce friendship. To Meghan, thank you for sharing reiki, friendship, and other healing tools with me in my last year. To Sue, Mel, Erika, thank you for vi hanging out with me through good and bad, for providing fun sporting items to compete over, and for that delicious chili cookoff. Sarah, thank you for your hardcore friendship love and for always making me laugh. Patrick and Randy, thank you for the drag queen distractions and for pushing me to go to graduation. Patrick, thank you for visiting me all over the place and for watching Gilmore Girls with me for well over a decade. To Kelsey, thank you for being a great sounding board, a card shark, and someone I will always want to go to Wales with. To my acupuncturist, Julia, for helping me get through the last seven months. You centered and grounded me in a way I was not expecting but certainly needed. To Samar, thank you for your friendship and for teaching me reiki as a tool for healing and grounding. To Ellie, thank you for being my partner in life. I wouldn’t be here without you, your support means everything to me. Thank you for access intimacy and for helping me off a ledge when I hit a hard point in work. Thank you proofreading in all those final moments, for always being ready to eat celebratory pizza with me, and for game nights with sparkling wine. I am constantly in awe of your intellect, your kindness, and wit. Thank you for being by my side. vii Table of Contents Introduction Comfort: A Powerful Social Construction ...................................................................................... 1 Chapter 1 Hygiene and the State: Legislating Bodies in Public ...................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • The Confidence-Man's
    "Secret Emotions": Disability in Public and Melville's The Confidence-Man Yoshiaki Furui Leviathan, Volume 15, Number 2, June 2013, pp. 54-68 (Article) Published by The Johns Hopkins University Press DOI: 10.1353/lvn.2013.0012 For additional information about this article http://muse.jhu.edu/journals/lvn/summary/v015/15.2.furui.html Access provided by Emory University Libraries (13 Oct 2013 22:58 GMT) “Secret Emotions”: Disability in Public and Melville’s The Confi dence-Man YOSHIAKI FURUI Emory University e is quite worthy?” (NN CM 29).1 In Herman Melville’s The Con- “ fi dence-Man: His Masquerade (1857), this query is posed in refer- Hence to Black Guinea, a “grotesque negro cripple” (NN CM 10) whose disability is suspected of being imposture. Who counts as worthy of sympathy and charity? Who counts as “disabled” in the fi rst place? These are the questions that Melville’s ninth book asks through its representation of dis- abled characters. In recent years, disability studies scholarship has led critics to notice the cultural and historical signifi cance of disability represented in Melville’s works.2 Among others, David Mitchell and Sharon Snyder’s and Ellen Samuels’s analyses have contributed signifi cantly to the understanding of The Confi dence-Man’s treatment of disability. Building on such developments, this essay interrogates The Confi - dence-Man’s engagement with disability by focusing on its situatedness in pub- lic space. Disabled bodies in the novel appear not in enclosed institutions, but in the open public space that is the riverboat Fidèle.
    [Show full text]
  • Customer Preferences and the Americans with Disabilities Act
    Brigham Young University Journal of Public Law Volume 34 Issue 1 Article 7 11-1-2019 Unfit ot Be Seen: Customer Preferences and the Americans with Disabilities Act Craig Westergard Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.law.byu.edu/jpl Part of the Law Commons Recommended Citation Craig Westergard, Unfit ot Be Seen: Customer Preferences and the Americans with Disabilities Act, 34 BYU J. Pub. L. 179 (2019). Available at: https://digitalcommons.law.byu.edu/jpl/vol34/iss1/7 This Comment is brought to you for free and open access by BYU Law Digital Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in Brigham Young University Journal of Public Law by an authorized editor of BYU Law Digital Commons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. WESTERGARD REVIEWED.DOCX (DO NOT DELETE) 3/26/2020 9:39 AM Unfit to Be Seen: Customer Preferences and the Americans with Disabilities Act ABSTRACT Disability discrimination is a persistent and pervasive problem. Its history in the United States stretches from the "ugly laws" of the late- 1800s to modern-day employment discrimination. In general, the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) prohibits employers from dis- criminating against disabled employees and job applicants. Employers often disregard this law, however, in order to cater to the untoward preferences of their customers. In theory, customer preferences are not a defense to discrimination, unless they pertain to safety, privacy, or authenticity. In practice, however, many courts seem to recognize an unseemly fourth exception to the general rule against customer pref- erence-based defenses. This occurs when disabled persons are deemed "unfit to be seen." This Note first chronicles the history of the ADA and the eco- nomic and psychological realities of customer preference-based de- fenses.
    [Show full text]
  • A Comparison of Modern and Historical Criminalization Laws
    Seattle University School of Law Seattle University School of Law Digital Commons Homeless Rights Advocacy Project Law School Archives 5-8-2015 The Wrong Side of History: A Comparison of Modern and Historical Criminalization Laws Javier Ortiz Matthew Dick Sara Rankin Seattle University School of Law Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.law.seattleu.edu/hrap Recommended Citation Ortiz, Javier; Dick, Matthew; and Rankin, Sara, "The Wrong Side of History: A Comparison of Modern and Historical Criminalization Laws" (2015). Homeless Rights Advocacy Project. 7. https://digitalcommons.law.seattleu.edu/hrap/7 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Law School Archives at Seattle University School of Law Digital Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in Homeless Rights Advocacy Project by an authorized administrator of Seattle University School of Law Digital Commons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. THE WRONG SIDE OF HIstORY: A Comparison of Modern & Historical Criminalization Laws Electronic copy available at: http://ssrn.com/abstract=2602533 The Wrong Side of History May 2015 The Wrong Side of History: A Comparison of Modern and Historical Criminalization Laws AUTHORS Javier Ortiz and Matthew Dick EDITOR Sara K. Rankin Electronic copy available at: http://ssrn.com/abstract=2602533 The Wrong Side of History May 2015 ACKNOWLEDGMENTS The Homeless Rights Advocacy Practicum (HRAP) is a section of the Homeless Rights Advocacy Project at Seattle University School of Law’s Korematsu Center. Javier Ortiz and Matthew Dick, law students at Seattle University School of Law and members of the founding cohort of HRAP, authored this policy brief under the supervision of Professor Sara Rankin of Seattle University School of Law.
    [Show full text]
  • Aberdeen / Matawan
    ■ 1 . CRPE PUB LIBRARY MATAWAN FREE 165 MAIN, ST _ B u l k R a t e m a t a w a n , - ; US Postage Paid P o t n n t n u / n IM 1 taioruuw n, p i j . P e r m i t # 6 6 BAYSHOREHUM SERVING ABERDEEN, HAZLET, KEYPORT, MATAWAN, UNION BEACH AND KEANSBURG JULY 8, 1992 25 CENTS VOL. 22 NUMBER 28 K e y p o r t m e r c h a n t s ‘ugly law’ cause split ardship? o v e r S I D Page 8 Page 3 H a z l e t Is M i l l e r A v e n u e p r o j e c t d u m p e r s Page 10 Page 11 Raring to go Bobby Bodak, 8, and his sister, Cheryl, 5, are eager to head out for a day at the beach. The u i t t m g Independent focuses on some favorite places for day trips. Pages 24-26 2 JULY 8, 1992, THE INDEPENDENT 2 2 55 2 r ! t i E E EirooD 2 ? o f 2 5 ° ° blue STAB i Beautiful Color 1 Gal. Cont. ' HARDY “THE HELPFUL GARDEN CENTERS’ for RHODOS. PERENNIALS 0 0 2 5 Hundreds to choose from Beautiful Lace Leaf PRIVET Large selection-3 gal. cont. fLAMOSCAPtbiir WEEPING 7Q99 He°GE 25 for 3 f o r ' 1 0 f o r SPREADHJGW fhuit tre f* JAPANESE ' ^ 0 0 3 f0 r3 9 » ES 19.99 each if RED MAPLE 2 ’/*’ t o 3 ’ 25 6 9 " 8.95 ea.________ 1U3 Kwazan lately teg.
    [Show full text]
  • Ugly Law Then and Now ______
    *1 Harvard Civil Rights-Civil Liberties Law Review Amicus [Vol. 46 Kicked to the Curb: Ugly Law Then and Now _______________________________ By Susan Schweik* ABSTRACT For most CRCL readers, discussion of the Americans with Disabilities Act (“ADA”) in the context of the politics of urban space will probably invoke images of frivolous lawsuits, backlash against civil rights law, and so on. This essay concerns a more unexpected and surprisingly blunt consequence of the ADA. I will focus on Portland, Oregon, where a new and cynical manipulation of the ADA pits disability rights against homeless rights. Setting this development in the historical context of a previous ordinance, the infamous “ugly law” that targeted poor disabled people in Portland and elsewhere, I will show how repudiation of that ordinance played a part in the creation of the ADA—an act now not only failing to prevent but even actively prescribing the targeting of poor disabled people. The case of Portland provides a broader opportunity to explore the relationship between people and physical space, considering: how city ordinances, and even federal civil rights law, can turn people into objects; how at the same time urban objects can enjoy protected status almost as if they were people; and how disability oppression, in the context of classed and capitalist social relations, has played a shifting role in these dynamics. Portland will also provide a location and occasion for exploring the relation between law and poetry (particularly street poetry) as forms of urban expression. Poems like those I take up here may be valuable tools for legal scholars, not simply because they document a stance, but because, in complex ways, they allow us to place laws in local dialogue with the people they affect.
    [Show full text]
  • The Victorian-Era Freak Show and Its Legacy in Contemporary Popular Culture
    Southern New Hampshire University Otherness as Entertainment The Victorian-Era Freak Show and its Legacy in Contemporary Popular Culture A Capstone Project Submitted to the College of Online and Continuing Education in Partial Fulfillment of the Master of Arts in History By Ernst O Ploeger IV Chehalis, Washington Submitted December 2018 Copyright © 2018 by Ernst O Ploeger IV All Rights Reserved ii Student: Ernst O. Ploeger IV I certify that this student has met the requirements for formatting the capstone project and that this project is suitable for preservation in the University Archive. __________________________________________ December 12, 2018 Capstone Instructor Date December 12, 2018 __________________________________________ _______________ Southern New Hampshire University Date College of Online and Continuing Education iii Abstract This research seeks to provide a more detailed examination of the fate of the Victorian- era freak show than provided in the historiography. The prominent contention is that once the specific maladies became known, the performers lost their draw as being mysterious and inexplicable. Consequentially, the freaks became human in the eyes of society and our ‘wonder’ was supplanted by sympathy and shame at our subjecting them to such degrading exploitation. The problem addressed in the following thesis is that there is little, if any, historical evidence to support this notion other than the conclusions drawn by a prominent sociologist. On the contrary, there exists ample evidence in the historical record that support three connected conclusions: First, the demise of the freak show cannot be divorced in the timeline from the decline of the circus and there exist numerous causal factors for the decline of both.
    [Show full text]
  • Table of Contents
    IDHS Human Rights Committee Chairperson Training Table of Contents Course Objectives ..................................................................................................... 4 Role of Human Rights Committee............................................................................... 5 Freedoms of Everyday Life ........................................................................................ 6 Perspectives on the Historical Treatment of People with Disabilities ............................. 7 Wyatt v. Stickney .................................................................................................... 10 Rules ...................................................................................................................... 11 Rules Quiz .............................................................................................................. 12 HRC Membership .................................................................................................... 13 Some Common HRC Models..................................................................................... 13 Stand Alone ......................................................................................................... 13 Consortium ......................................................................................................... 13 Combined HRC/Behavior Management Committee (BMC) ....................................... 13 What is a Rights Restriction? ..................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • A Brief History of Disability in the United States and Massachusetts
    A Brief History of Disability In the United States and Massachusetts A Publication of the Massachusetts Office on Disability 2016 Page 1 of 36 “The governor shall annually issue a proclamation setting apart the month of October as Disability History Month to increase awareness and understanding of the contributions made by persons with disabilities. Appropriate state agencies and cities and towns and public schools, colleges and universities shall establish programs designed to educate and promote these objectives.” — Massachusetts General Law Chapter 6, Section 15LLLLL. Page 2 of 36 The Massachusetts Office on Disability (MOD) is pleased to present this publication which will provide a brief history of significant disability policies, developments, and figures in the United States and Massachusetts throughout the past two centuries in commemoration of Disability History Month. Note: The Massachusetts Office on Disability recognizes that the following Timeline includes language used to describe people with disabilities that is deemed inappropriate and insensitive today. However, we maintain that these descriptions are being used in their historical context for educational purposes. MOD’s primary mission is to ensure the full and equal participation of all people with disabilities in all aspects of life by working to advance legal rights, maximum opportunities, supportive services, accommodations and accessibility in a manner that fosters dignity and self- determination. Page 3 of 36 Chapter One: 1776-1900 The period from our nation’s founding to the end of the Nineteenth Century saw many hardships for Americans with disabilities. Exploitation, exclusion, ignorance and poor living conditions marked this early time in U.S. history.
    [Show full text]
  • Culturally Informed Policy & Programs: with and for People with Disabilities
    Ensuring Equity in Aging Webinar Series Culturally Informed Policy & Programs: With and For People with Disabilities Captioners Transcript December 2, 2020 1 00:00:05.850 --> 00:00:22.560 Amanda Lawrence: Alright, good morning everybody and welcome to the second installment of the California Department of Aging's ensuring equity in aging webinar series. Today we are going to focus on culturally informed policy and programs with and for people with disabilities. 2 00:00:24.180 --> 00:00:29.760 Amanda Lawrence: So today, you can join us by audio or of course here on zoom and we are, we do have live 3 00:00:30.240 --> 00:00:35.220 Amanda Lawrence: Captioning through webinar available. So go ahead and you can click that CC button at the bottom of your screen. 4 00:00:35.610 --> 00:00:47.280 Amanda Lawrence: We are going to record today's presentation we will post the recording the slides and the transcripts on CDA’s webpage. We 1 have an equity and aging Resource Center available online and you can find the link to that there. 5 00:00:47.520 --> 00:00:52.890 Amanda Lawrence: We also will post the video on or the recording on our YouTube channel. Next slide. 6 00:00:54.000 --> 00:01:01.620 Amanda Lawrence: We will reserve time for questions and comments at the end of this presentation, although we do also use this on the chat feature in zoom. So 7 00:01:01.860 --> 00:01:08.850 Amanda Lawrence: Please go ahead.
    [Show full text]
  • The Enfreakment of Language: Disability, Eugenics, And
    THE ENFREAKMENT OF LANGUAGE: DISABILITY, EUGENICS, AND RHETORIC A Dissertation by STEPHANIE KRISTEN WHEELER Submitted to the Office of Graduate and Professional Studies of Texas A&M University in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY Chair of Committee, Qwo-Li Driskill Co-Chair of Committee, Valerie Balester Committee Members, Robert Griffin Robert Shandley Head of Department, Nancy Warren May 2014 Major Subject: English Copyright 2014 Stephanie Kristen Wheeler ABSTRACT This project is motivated by the presence of eugenics in our dominant approaches to meaning-making: what does it look like, and why should we care? To begin to answer these questions, this dissertation works from two concepts: enfreakment – the identification of elements that are desirable or wanted – and eugenicist logics, the removal of what is not wanted or deemed necessary for the desired outcome, or alternatively, the replication of the elements that are considered useful. To observe the interaction between the logic of eugenics and enfreakment within ableist systems, this dissertation develops the enfreakment of language, a term that encompasses both the process of enfreakment and the heuristic that allows us to see that process in action. The enfreakment of language uncovers how particular modes of Western and Euro-American meaning-making depend on the logic of eugenics, a dependency that is detrimental to the bodies that become subjected to the power gained through this logic. Focusing on some of the implications of the overlap and interaction between the logics of eugenics and enfreakment within ableist systems, this project demonstrates the operation of eugenics as a logic that motivates discourses around human variation.
    [Show full text]
  • The Brookings Institution
    LAW-2013/01/31 1 THE BROOKINGS INSTITUTION LAW'S VIRTUES: EXPLORING THE TENSIONS BETWEEN LAW AND VALUES IN THE UNITED STATES Washington, D.C. Thursday, January 31, 2013 PARTICIPANTS: Moderator: WILLIAM GALSTON Senior Fellow and Ezra K. Zilkha Chair The Brookings Institution Presentation: CATHLEEN KAVENY, John P. Murphy Professor of Law and Professor of Theology University of Notre Dame Respondents: E.J. DIONNE, JR., Senior Fellow The Brookings Institution MICHAEL MORELAND, Vice Dean and Professor of Law Villanova University School of Law MELISSA ROGERS, Nonresident Senior Fellow The Brookings Institution MARGARET LITTLE, Director, Kennedy Institute of Ethics Associate Professor, Philosophy Georgetown University * * * * * ANDERSON COURT REPORTING 706 Duke Street, Suite 100 Alexandria, VA 22314 Phone (703) 519-7180 Fax (703) 519-7190 LAW-2013/01/31 2 P R O C E E D I N G S MR. GALSTON: Okay. I think we can get started. Let me begin by introducing myself. I'm Bill Galston, a Senior Fellow in Governance Studies here at Brookings and on behalf of all sorts of people I'd like to welcome you here. This session is a joint production of the Religion, Policy and Politics Program in Governance Studies at Brookings. A program in which E.J. Dionne and Melissa Rogers, both of whom are here today and will speak shortly, have taken leading roles. And also, the long running hit series Governing Ideas, now in its fifth year. And let me just tell you a little bit about this series. As those of you who are from Washington know, we spend an enormous amount of time talking about politics in this town.
    [Show full text]
  • Chronology of Critical Events
    Three Chronology of Critical Events t is controversial precisely when the history of disability policy and law Ibegins. Religious texts proscribing the treatment of people with mental or physical impairments, the early legal definitions of people with sen- sory and mental impairments in classical Rome, the founding of alms- houses and charitable foundations, and the beginning of wardship law in Middle Ages are all early versions of “disability law.” Still, it was not until the dawn of the 17th century that disability law and policy existed in forms recognizable today. Although we begin this chronology with the English Poor Law of 1601, this law was actually the last, and most influen- tial, of a series of English statutes, going back at least to 1388, which were essentially regulatory laws for economic policy that distinguished between the “deserving poor,” who were incapacitated because of age or impairment and would be allowed to beg, and those “sturdy beggars” who could be diverted to public workhouses. Disability ethics is another matter. Disability issues appear briefly and without much comment in ethical writings since the ancient Greeks, and there is also the well-known Biblical anti-discrimination injunction in Leviticus 19:14: “Thou shalt not curse the deaf nor put a stumbling block before the blind, nor maketh the blind to wander out of the path.” Still, one has to wait until the mid-20th century to find ethicists writing at length about the ethical dimension of disability in society, often in the bio- ethical context in response to high-profile legal cases. 137 138 ETHICS, LAW, AND POLICY What follows is a chronology of important events and milestones in disability law, policy, and ethics.
    [Show full text]