DOCSLIB.ORG

1 Complaint for Iipay Nation of Santa Ysabel, Declaratory and P.O

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
1 Complaint for Iipay Nation of Santa Ysabel, Declaratory and P.O Case 1:20-cv-02712 Document 1 Filed 09/23/20 Page 1 of 68 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA MANZANITA BAND OF THE KUMEYAAY Case No. ______________ NATION, 6 Old Mine Road Boulevard, CA 91905, CAMPO KUMEYAAY NATION, 36190 Church Road, Suite 1 Campo, CA 91906, EWIIAAPAAYP BAND OF KUMEYAAY INDIANS, 4054 Willows Road Alpine, CA 91901 COMPLAINT FOR IIPAY NATION OF SANTA YSABEL, DECLARATORY AND P.O. Box 130 INJUNCTIVE RELIEF Schoolhouse Canyon Road Santa Ysabel, CA 92070 SYCUAN BAND OF THE KUMEYAAY NATION, 1 Kwaaypaay Court El Cajon, CA 92019 on behalf themselves and on behalf of their members as parens patriae, JOHN ELLIOTT P.O. Box 1122 19 Blackwood Road Boulevard, CA 91905, and KUMEYAAY HERITAGE PRESERVATION COUNCIL, 5663 Balboa Avenue, Suite 610 San Diego, CA 92111 Plaintiffs, v. CHAD WOLF, in his official capacity as Under Secretary of Homeland Security for Strategy, Policy, and Plans, 1 Case 1:20-cv-02712 Document 1 Filed 09/23/20 Page 2 of 68 MS 0445 2707 Martin Luther King Jr. Avenue SE Washington, DC 20528-0525, THE DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY, MS 0525 2707 Martin Luther King Jr. Avenue SE Washington, DC 20528-0525, MARK MORGAN, in his official capacity as Senior Official Performing the Duties of the Commissioner of United States Customs and Border Protection, 1300 Pennsylvania Ave NW Washington, DC 20229, UNITED STATES CUSTOMS AND BORDER PROTECTION, 1300 Pennsylvania Avenue NW Washington, DC 20229, TODD SEMONITE, in his official capacity as Commanding General of the United States Army Corps of Engineers, 441 G Street NW Washington, DC 20314-1000, and THE UNITED STATES ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS, 441 G Street NW Washington, DC 20314-1000 Defendants. I. NATURE OF THE ACTION 1. The Kumeyaay people have, historically and to the present day, lived in what is now California and Mexico, on both sides of the border imposed on the land by the United States and Mexico in the mid-19th century. Today, the Kumeyaay Nation is comprised of thirteen federally-recognized Indian tribes occupying reservations in southern California, whose members reside in both the United States and Mexico, and regularly travel back and forth for cultural, and 2 Case 1:20-cv-02712 Document 1 Filed 09/23/20 Page 3 of 68 religious purposes, as the Kumeyaay people have historically done. The Kumeyaay people, including members of the Plaintiff Tribes and individual Plaintiff, continue to practice their religion and maintain their culture as part of their daily life throughout their territory, including the border region on both sides, where sacred sites, trails, plants and medicines, and the landscape itself have sustained their people for hundreds of years. The Plaintiff Kumeyaay Tribes are today all located in San Diego County, California. They seek a declaratory judgment and injunctive relief to protect the Kumeyaay people’s ability to practice their religious beliefs and cultural traditions at and across the border region, as they have done for hundreds of years, by preventing Defendants from constructing a trench, a 30-foot-high fence that extends from that trench, and its related infrastructure at the border, and within the region of the border relied on by the Kumeyaay people, until the Defendant Department of Homeland Security and its officials comply with federal law. Specifically, the Religious Freedom Restoration Act (“RFRA”) and the Illegal Immigration Reform and Immigrant Responsibility Act of 1996, as amended (“IIRIRA”), require Defendants to consult with the Kumeyaay Tribes on how to avoid the unnecessary destruction and desecration of Kumeyaay religious and cultural sites, human remains, sacred and funerary objects, and the historical record of their culture that marks the landscape, before constructing, during construction, and while maintaining the border fence, and further require Defendants to implement the results of that consultation to protect the religious and cultural rights of the Kumeyaay people for that same period. 2. This action is made necessary by the failure of the Defendants, in designing and constructing a fence and related infrastructure at the U.S.-Mexico border, to consult with the Kumeyaay Tribes about how to avoid or minimize the destruction and desecration of locations and disruption of practices that are central to Kumeyaay religious life and practice. The Defendants, 3 Case 1:20-cv-02712 Document 1 Filed 09/23/20 Page 4 of 68 each of whom has failed to consult with the Kumeyaay Tribes, are: the Under Secretary of Homeland Security for Strategy, Policy, and Plans Chad Wolf, who is purporting to exercise the duties of the Acting Secretary of Homeland Security (“Defendant Wolf”) but who has no legal authority to do so; the Department of Homeland Security (“DHS”); the Senior Official Performing the Duties of the Commissioner of United States Customs and Border Protection, Mark Morgan (“Commissioner”); the United States Customs and Border Protection (“CBP”); Commanding General of the United States Army Corps of Engineers Lieutenant General Todd Semonite (“Commanding General”); and the United States Army Corps of Engineers (“Corps”) (collectively, “Defendants”). 3. Defendants’ actions violate their obligations under IIRIRA and RFRA, the Kumeyaay people’s rights under IIRIRA and RFRA, and the rights of the Kumeyaay people to the free exercise of religion under the First Amendment to the United States Constitution. Defendants are therefore acting ultra vires, and Plaintiffs are entitled to declaratory and injunctive relief against them, that will protect the religious and cultural rights of the Plaintiff Kumeyaay Tribes and their members’ rights to religious exercise, all of which are protected by federal law. 4. In addition, because the Defendant Wolf has no legal authority to exercise the duties of the Secretary of Homeland Security, he cannot lawfully waive the application of other federal laws to the border fence project in eastern San Diego County and the border fence project in western Imperial County, and therefore the Defendants are acting arbitrarily, capriciously, contrary to law, and without observance of procedures required by law by failing to comply with the National Environmental Policy Act, the National Historic Preservation Act, the Endangered Species Act, the Native American Graves Protection and Repatriation Act, and the American 4 Case 1:20-cv-02712 Document 1 Filed 09/23/20 Page 5 of 68 Indian Religious Freedom Act, and their actions must be reversed under the Administrative Procedure Act. 5. Furthermore, the Defendant Wolf’s purported waiver of the application of various federal laws to the border fence project in eastern San Diego County and the border fence project in western Imperial County violates the Free Exercise Clause of the First Amendment because by purporting to waive the application of the American Indian Religious Freedom Act and the Native American Graves Protection and Repatriation Act, the Defendant Wolf has “impose[d] special disabilities on the basis of religious views or religious status,” Emp’t Div. v. Smith, 494 U.S. 872, 877 (1990) (citations omitted), with respect to Native American religions, but no other. The Defendant Wolf is therefore acting arbitrarily, capriciously, contrary to law, and without observance of procedures required by law, and he induced Defendants DHS, CBP, Commissioner Morgan, the Corps, and Commanding General Semonite to rely on the purported waiver and themselves violate the law. II. PARTIES 6. The Plaintiff Manzanita Band of the Kumeyaay Nation (“Manzanita”) is a federally-recognized Indian tribe, see Indian Entities Recognized by and Eligible to Receive Services from the United States Bureau of Indian Affairs, 85 Fed. Reg. 5462, 5464 (Jan. 30, 2020) (listed as “Manzanita Band of Diegueno Mission Indians of the Manzanita Reservation, California”), with a governing body duly recognized by the Department of the Interior, and is a member of the Kumeyaay Nation. The Manzanita Reservation is 4,752 acres, located just north of Live Oak Springs, California and the Campo Reservation, approximately ten miles north of the U.S.-Mexico border. Most members of the Manzanita Band live on the Reservation and in and around the Kumeyaay Nation’s aboriginal territory. 5 Case 1:20-cv-02712 Document 1 Filed 09/23/20 Page 6 of 68 7. The Plaintiff Campo Kumeyaay Nation (“Campo”) is a federally-recognized Indian tribe, see id. at 5463 (listed as “Campo Band of Diegueno Mission Indians of the Campo Indian Reservation, California”), with a governing body duly recognized by the Department of the Interior, and is a member of the Kumeyaay Nation. The Campo Reservation is 16,512 acres located around Live Oak Springs, Clover Flat, and Tierra del Sol, California. The southern boundary of the Campo Reservation is located approximately 0.4 miles north of the U.S.-Mexico border. Members of the Campo Kumeyaay Nation live on the Reservation, and in and around the Kumeyaay Nation’s aboriginal territory. 8. The Plaintiff Ewiiaapaayp Band of Kumeyaay Indians (“Ewiiaapaayp”) is a federally-recognized Indian tribe, see id., with a governing body duly recognized by the Department of the Interior, and is a member of the Kumeyaay Nation. The main Ewiiaapaayp Reservation is approximately 4,102 acres, located southeast of Mount Laguna, California, approximately thirty miles north of the U.S.-Mexico border. Most members of the Ewiiaapaayp Band live off-reservation in and around the Kumeyaay Nation’s aboriginal territory. 9. The Plaintiff Iipay Nation of Santa Ysabel (“Iipay”) is a federally-recognized Indian tribe, see id., with a governing body duly recognized by the Department of the Interior, and is a member of the Kumeyaay Nation. The Santa Ysabel Reservation is approximately 15,526 acres, located near Santa Ysabel and Julian, California, approximately thirty-five miles north of the U.S.-Mexico border. Most members of the Iipay Nation live on the reservation and in and around the Kumeyaay Nation’s aboriginal territory.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • California Indian Food and Culture PHOEBE A
    California Indian Food and Culture PHOEBE A. HEARST MUSEUM OF ANTHROPOLOGY Written and Designed by Nicole Mullen Contributors: Ira Jacknis, Barbara Takiguchi, and Liberty Winn. Sources Consulted The former exhibition: Food in California Indian Culture at the Phoebe A. Hearst Museum of Anthropology. Ortiz, Beverly, as told by Julia Parker. It Will Live Forever. Heyday Books, Berkeley, CA 1991. Jacknis, Ira. Food in California Indian Culture. Hearst Museum Publications, Berkeley, CA, 2004. Copyright © 2003. Phoebe A. Hearst Museum of Anthropology and the Regents of the University of California, Berkeley. All Rights Reserved. PHOEBE A. HEARST MUSEUM OF ANTHROPOLOGY Table of Contents 1. Glossary 2. Topics of Discussion for Lessons 3. Map of California Cultural Areas 4. General Overview of California Indians 5. Plants and Plant Processing 6. Animals and Hunting 7. Food from the Sea and Fishing 8. Insects 9. Beverages 10. Salt 11. Drying Foods 12. Earth Ovens 13. Serving Utensils 14. Food Storage 15. Feasts 16. Children 17. California Indian Myths 18. Review Questions and Activities PHOEBE A. HEARST MUSEUM OF ANTHROPOLOGY Glossary basin an open, shallow, usually round container used for holding liquids carbohydrate Carbohydrates are found in foods like pasta, cereals, breads, rice and potatoes, and serve as a major energy source in the diet. Central Valley The Central Valley lies between the Coast Mountain Ranges and the Sierra Nevada Mountain Ranges. It has two major river systems, the Sacramento and the San Joaquin. Much of it is flat, and looks like a broad, open plain. It forms the largest and most important farming area in California and produces a great variety of crops.
    [Show full text]
  • Summer 2019, Volume 65, Number 2
    The Journal of The Journal of SanSan DiegoDiego HistoryHistory The Journal of San Diego History The San Diego History Center, founded as the San Diego Historical Society in 1928, has always been the catalyst for the preservation and promotion of the history of the San Diego region. The San Diego History Center makes history interesting and fun and seeks to engage audiences of all ages in connecting the past to the present and to set the stage for where our community is headed in the future. The organization operates museums in two National Historic Districts, the San Diego History Center and Research Archives in Balboa Park, and the Junípero Serra Museum in Presidio Park. The History Center is a lifelong learning center for all members of the community, providing outstanding educational programs for schoolchildren and popular programs for families and adults. The Research Archives serves residents, scholars, students, and researchers onsite and online. With its rich historical content, archived material, and online photo gallery, the San Diego History Center’s website is used by more than 1 million visitors annually. The San Diego History Center is a Smithsonian Affiliate and one of the oldest and largest historical organizations on the West Coast. Front Cover: Illustration by contemporary artist Gene Locklear of Kumeyaay observing the settlement on Presidio Hill, c. 1770. Back Cover: View of Presidio Hill looking southwest, c. 1874 (SDHC #11675-2). Design and Layout: Allen Wynar Printing: Crest Offset Printing Copy Edits: Samantha Alberts Articles appearing in The Journal of San Diego History are abstracted and indexed in Historical Abstracts and America: History and Life.
    [Show full text]
  • Edible Seeds and Grains of California Tribes
    National Plant Data Team August 2012 Edible Seeds and Grains of California Tribes and the Klamath Tribe of Oregon in the Phoebe Apperson Hearst Museum of Anthropology Collections, University of California, Berkeley August 2012 Cover photos: Left: Maidu woman harvesting tarweed seeds. Courtesy, The Field Museum, CSA1835 Right: Thick patch of elegant madia (Madia elegans) in a blue oak woodland in the Sierra foothills The U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) prohibits discrimination in all its pro- grams and activities on the basis of race, color, national origin, age, disability, and where applicable, sex, marital status, familial status, parental status, religion, sex- ual orientation, genetic information, political beliefs, reprisal, or because all or a part of an individual’s income is derived from any public assistance program. (Not all prohibited bases apply to all programs.) Persons with disabilities who require alternative means for communication of program information (Braille, large print, audiotape, etc.) should contact USDA’s TARGET Center at (202) 720-2600 (voice and TDD). To file a complaint of discrimination, write to USDA, Director, Office of Civil Rights, 1400 Independence Avenue, SW., Washington, DC 20250–9410, or call (800) 795-3272 (voice) or (202) 720-6382 (TDD). USDA is an equal opportunity provider and employer. Acknowledgments This report was authored by M. Kat Anderson, ethnoecologist, U.S. Department of Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation Service (NRCS) and Jim Effenberger, Don Joley, and Deborah J. Lionakis Meyer, senior seed bota- nists, California Department of Food and Agriculture Plant Pest Diagnostics Center. Special thanks to the Phoebe Apperson Hearst Museum staff, especially Joan Knudsen, Natasha Johnson, Ira Jacknis, and Thusa Chu for approving the project, helping to locate catalogue cards, and lending us seed samples from their collections.
    [Show full text]
  • 4 Tribal Nations of San Diego County This Chapter Presents an Overall Summary of the Tribal Nations of San Diego County and the Water Resources on Their Reservations
    4 Tribal Nations of San Diego County This chapter presents an overall summary of the Tribal Nations of San Diego County and the water resources on their reservations. A brief description of each Tribe, along with a summary of available information on each Tribe’s water resources, is provided. The water management issues provided by the Tribe’s representatives at the San Diego IRWM outreach meetings are also presented. 4.1 Reservations San Diego County features the largest number of Tribes and Reservations of any county in the United States. There are 18 federally-recognized Tribal Nation Reservations and 17 Tribal Governments, because the Barona and Viejas Bands share joint-trust and administrative responsibility for the Capitan Grande Reservation. All of the Tribes within the San Diego IRWM Region are also recognized as California Native American Tribes. These Reservation lands, which are governed by Tribal Nations, total approximately 127,000 acres or 198 square miles. The locations of the Tribal Reservations are presented in Figure 4-1 and summarized in Table 4-1. Two additional Tribal Governments do not have federally recognized lands: 1) the San Luis Rey Band of Luiseño Indians (though the Band remains active in the San Diego region) and 2) the Mount Laguna Band of Luiseño Indians. Note that there may appear to be inconsistencies related to population sizes of tribes in Table 4-1. This is because not all Tribes may choose to participate in population surveys, or may identify with multiple heritages. 4.2 Cultural Groups Native Americans within the San Diego IRWM Region generally comprise four distinct cultural groups (Kumeyaay/Diegueno, Luiseño, Cahuilla, and Cupeño), which are from two distinct language families (Uto-Aztecan and Yuman-Cochimi).
    [Show full text]
  • Federal Register/Vol. 86, No. 98/Monday, May 24, 2021/Notices
    27892 Federal Register / Vol. 86, No. 98 / Monday, May 24, 2021 / Notices 225. Saginaw Chippewa Indian Tribe of 273. Tolowa Dee-ni’ Nation Commission (‘‘Commission’’) Michigan 274. Tonkawa Tribe of Oklahoma determines, pursuant to the Tariff Act of 226. Salt River Pima-Maricopa Indian 275. Tonto Apache Tribe 1930 (‘‘the Act’’), that revocation of the Community 276. Torres Martinez Desert Cahuilla countervailing duty and antidumping 227. Samish Indian Tribe Indians duty orders on certain steel grating from 228. San Carlos Apache Tribe 277. Tulalip Tribes of Washington China would be likely to lead to 229. San Manual Band of Mission 278. Tule River Tribe continuation or recurrence of material Indians 279. Tunica-Biloxi Indians of Louisiana injury to an industry in the United 230. San Pasqual Band of Diegueno 280. Tuolumne Band of Me-Wuk States within a reasonably foreseeable Mission Indians Indians time. 231. Santa Rosa Rancheria Tachi-Yokut 281. Turtle Mountain Band of Chippewa Tribe Indians Background 232. Santa Ynez Band of Chumash 282. Twenty-Nine Palms Band of The Commission instituted these Mission Indians Mission Indians reviews on October 1, 2020 (85 FR 233. Sauk-Suiattle Indian Tribe 283. United Auburn Indian Community 61981) and determined on January 4, 234. Sault Ste. Marie Tribe of Chippewa 284. Upper Sioux Community 2021 that it would conduct expedited Indians 285. Upper Skagit Indian Tribe of reviews (86 FR 19286, April 13, 2021). 235. Scotts Valley Band of Pomo Indians Washington The Commission made these 236. Seminole Nation of Oklahoma 286. Ute Mountain Ute Tribe determinations pursuant to section 237.
    [Show full text]
  • Biological Opinion (Opinion) in Accordance with Section 7 of the Endangered Species Act of 1973 (Act), As Amended (16 U.S.C
    In Reply Refer to: FWS-SDG-15B0072-20F1452 November 17, 2020 Sent Electronically Memorandum To: Regional Endangered Species Program Manager Sacramento, California From: Field Supervisor, Carlsbad Fish and Wildlife Office Carlsbad, California Subject: Intra-Service Formal Section 7 Consultation for the Issuance of an Amendment to the County of San Diego’s Endangered Species Act Section 10(a)(1)(B) Permit (PRT-840414) for the Multiple Species Conservation Program, San Diego Subarea Plan to address the Otay Ranch Village 14 and Planning Areas 16 and 19, San Diego County, California This document transmits the U. S. Fish and Wildlife Service’s (Service) biological opinion (Opinion) in accordance with section 7 of the Endangered Species Act of 1973 (Act), as amended (16 U.S.C. 1531 et seq.), regarding the issuance of an amendment to the incidental take permit (ITP) for the Multiple Species Conservation Program (MSCP) County of San Diego (County) Subarea Plan (Subarea Plan) for Otay Ranch Village 14 and Planning Areas 16 and 19 (Project) pursuant to section 10(a)(1)(B) of the Act. The Service issued the Section 10(a)(1)(B) permit (PRT-840414) to the County for their Subarea Plan on March 17, 1998. The permit duration is for 50 years. The County is requesting the Amendment to change the footprint of the Project, as well as add incidental take coverage for the federally endangered Quino checkerspot butterfly (Euphydryas editha quino; QCB) and San Diego fairy shrimp (Branchinecta sandiegonensis; SDFS). The MSCP is a comprehensive, 50-year habitat conservation plan program that addresses urban development and the needs of 85 covered species and the preservation of natural vegetation communities within a 582,243-acre planning area in southwest San Diego County (City of San Diego 1998).
    [Show full text]
  • California-Nevada Region
    Research Guides for both historic and modern Native Communities relating to records held at the National Archives California Nevada Introduction Page Introduction Page Historic Native Communities Historic Native Communities Modern Native Communities Modern Native Communities Sample Document Beginning of the Treaty of Peace and Friendship between the U.S. Government and the Kahwea, San Luis Rey, and Cocomcahra Indians. Signed at the Village of Temecula, California, 1/5/1852. National Archives. https://catalog.archives.gov/id/55030733 National Archives Native Communities Research Guides. https://www.archives.gov/education/native-communities California Native Communities To perform a search of more general records of California’s Native People in the National Archives Online Catalog, use Advanced Search. Enter California in the search box and 75 in the Record Group box (Bureau of Indian Affairs). There are several great resources available for general information and material for kids about the Native People of California, such as the Native Languages and National Museum of the American Indian websites. Type California into the main search box for both. Related state agencies and universities may also hold records or information about these communities. Examples might include the California State Archives, the Online Archive of California, and the University of California Santa Barbara Native American Collections. Historic California Native Communities Federally Recognized Native Communities in California (2018) Sample Document Map of Selected Site for Indian Reservation in Mendocino County, California, 7/30/1856. National Archives: https://catalog.archives.gov/id/50926106 National Archives Native Communities Research Guides. https://www.archives.gov/education/native-communities Historic California Native Communities For a map of historic language areas in California, see Native Languages.
    [Show full text]
  • South Bay Historical Society Bulletin December 2017 Issue No
    South Bay Historical Society Bulletin December 2017 Issue No. 17 First People ocean and from the broad Tijuana River lagoon that existed back then. Also found was Coso Who were the First People? Where did they obsidian from Inyo County over 300 miles away, live? How were they able to survive? At our showing that these people had an extensive meeting on Monday, December 11 at 6 pm in trade network.2 the Chula Vista Library, Dennis Gallegos will answer these questions. His new book, First The First People may have come to the South People: A Revised Chronology for San Diego Bay long before those found at Remington Hills. County, examines the archaeological evidence Scientists from the San Diego Natural History going back to the end of the Ice Age 10,000 Museum have examined mastodon bones years ago. The ancestors of todayʼs Kumeyaay may have come down the coast from the shrinking Bering land bridge. Ancestors who spoke the ancient Hokan language may have come from the east, overland from the receding waters of the Great Basin. These early people (Californiaʼs first migrants) were called the “Scraper-Makers” by the pioneering archaeologist Malcolm Rogers in the 1920s.1 The name came from the stone tools that Rogers discovered at many sites in San Diego County, from the San Dieguito River in the north to the Otay River in the south. Rogers described their culture as the “San Dieguito pattern” based on his research at the Harris site near Lake Hodges on the San Dieguito River. This same cultural pattern and stone tools have been found at the Remington Hills site in western Otay Mesa.
    [Show full text]
  • Kumeyaay Historian Dispels the California Origin Myth the Contribution of the Spanish Mission System in California's History
    Kumeyaay historian dispels the California origin myth The contribution of the Spanish mission system in California’s history has become legendary, in no small part due to the emphasis on missions in the 4th grade curriculum. Yet, fewer Californians may be aware that the original Spanish missions built during the 1700s by Junipero Serra and other Franciscan priests had all but disintegrated when the intercontinental railroad and a novel by a minister’s daughter sparked a movement to rebuild the missions in the late 1800s. Helen Hunt Jackson intended her novel, Ramona, to do for Indians what Uncle Tom’s Cabin did for African-Americans in promoting reform. But as her book became hugely successful, the law of unintended consequences took effect. Railroad entrepreneurs wanted to drive tourists to California, and as Ramona-readers arrived from the East, they wanted to visit the missions and ranchos romanticized in the novel. “The missions were rubble and the presidios were gone,” says Michael Connolly Miskwish, a Kumeyaay tribal member and adjunct professor at San Diego State University who has written a textbook covering the period before the Spaniards came to the area until 1893. “But people in the towns in California said we’ve got something that people want to see, so let’s recreate it.” By the1890s architects were employing the Mission Revival style in residences, commercial buildings, schools, and railroad depots characterized by stucco walls and red tile roofs. That and the subsequent Spanish Revival style have become classic California architecture. “It was Anglo-Americans who actually created this whole type of structure as an imitation of what they saw as the Spanish period,” notes Miskwish.
    [Show full text]
  • Santa Ana Mountains Tecate Cypress (Cupressus Forbesii) Management Plan
    Final Santa Ana Mountains Tecate Cypress (Cupressus forbesii) Management Plan Prepared by: Susana Rodriguez-Buritica & Katharine Suding University of California, Berkeley Department of Environmental Sciences, Policy, and Management Berkeley, CA 94720 & Kristine Preston Nature Reserve of Orange County 15600 Sand Canyon Avenue Irvine, CA 92618 Prepared for: California Department of Fish and Game 4949 Viewridge Avenue San Diego, CA 92123 Contract # P0750005 01 & Nature Reserve of Orange County May 17, 2010 Santa Ana Mountains Tecate Cypress Management Plan EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Orange County’s Central and Coastal Natural Community Conservation Plan/Habitat Conservation Plan (NCCP/HCP) was established in 1996 to conserve sensitive plant and animal species on approximately 37,000 acres. Tecate cypress (Cupressus forbesii) is a rare endemic species restricted to several locations in southern California and northern Baja California. The northern most population of Tecate cypress occurs in the Santa Ana Mountains within the NCCP/HCP Central Reserve and receives regulatory coverage under the Plan. This population is threatened by too frequent wildfire. The Nature Reserve of Orange County (NROC) oversees monitoring and management of species within the NCCP/HCP and formed the Tecate Cypress Management Committee (TCMC) to develop a management plan for this species. The committee is composed of land owners, land managers and regulatory agencies with an interest in conserving Tecate cypress in the NCCP/HCP. This management plan was developed by NROC based upon the work of researchers from UC Berkeley and input from the TCMC. The objectives of this management plan included determining the current distribution and demographic structure of the Santa Ana Mountains Tecate cypress population and using this data in ecological models to assess threats to persistence and to identify restoration sites for enhancing the population.
    [Show full text]
  • Indigenous Cultures and History in Calibaja Frontera Friday Issue Brief No
    INDIGENOUS CULTURES AND HISTORY IN CALIBAJA FRONTERA FRIDAY ISSUE BRIEF NO. 4 Frontera Fridays are quarterly events that connect leaders from both sides of the border to UC San Diego and serve as a platform for learning, networking and discussing opportunities and challenges that make our binational region unique. They are organized by the Center for U.S.-Mexican Studies (USMEX) at the School of Global Policy and Strategy (GPS) and the Urban Studies & Planning Program (USP) and honor the legacy of Chuck Nathanson and the San Diego Dialogue. The Kumeyaay-Digueno people (known as Kumiai in Baja California) have inhabited the Calibaja region for more than 10,000 years. They established seasonal settlements along the coast from north of La Jolla to Ensenada, in the mountain regions from Palomar through Tecate, and into the desert regions of the Imperial/Mexicali Valleys. They fished, hunted and utilized the wide varieties of plant life found in the San Diego and Tijuana River watersheds both for food and medicine. The arrival of the Spanish missionaries and soldiers in the late 18th century disrupted the Kumeyaay way of life. They were forced to labor on the mission properties, cultivating non-native plants and raising livestock. Although the first Baja California mission was established at Loreto in what is now Baja California Sur in 1697, there was not significant presence of Spaniards in the Kumeyaay areas until after the founding of the San Diego de Alcala mission in 1769. After that, land grants awarding traditional lands to the foreigners, encroachment on villages by colonizing ranchers and settlers, and death from forced labor and foreign diseases followed.
    [Show full text]
  • Kumeyaay Cultural Landscapes of Baja California's Tijuana River
    Journal of California and Great Basin Anthropology | Vol. 28, No. 2 (2008) | pp. 127–151 Kumeyaay Cultural Landscapes of Baja California’s Tijuana River Watershed LYNN H. GAMBLE MICHAEL WILKEN-ROBERTSON Department of Anthropology, San Diego State University, 5500 Campanile Drive, San Diego, CA 92182 The cultural landscape of the Kumeyaay living in the Tijuana River Watershed of Baja California embodies the sacred, symbolic, economic, and mythological views of a people who have lived in the region for centuries. Recent research on this region that integrates ethnographic, ethnohistorical, and (to a lesser degree) archaeological information reveals a landscape that is alive and imbued with power, sustenance, and legend—a dynamic construct that reflects both changing Kumeyaay relationships with the land and the group’s continuity with the past. Sacred sites, peaks, transformed rocks, magic boulders, and other geographic features associated with oral traditions populate the landscape. Ecosystems and areas of historic significance represent direct links with generations of ancestors and are still layered with meaning in the minds of descendants. For us the mountains, the rocks, the trees: all this is something important. As my grandfather used to say, this ground is the floor for your feet, the rocks and hills are your walls, the sky is your roof and the sun your light1 [Josefina López Meza, personal communication 2004]. ultural landscapes are an elusive topic All individuals and communities, not just the C for archaeologists, especially those who work in Kumeyaay, give symbolic meanings to the places they regions of the Californias and the Great Basin where inhabit: monumental architecture is rare or non-existent.
    [Show full text]