DOCSLIB.ORG

Jean Berenger. a History of the Habsburg Empire, 1700-1918

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Jean Berenger. a History of the Habsburg Empire, 1700-1918 Jean Berenger. A History of the Habsburg Empire, 1700-1918. White Plains: Longman, 1997. ix + 342 pp. $97.33, cloth, ISBN 978-0-582-09008-8. Reviewed by Gary B. Cohen Published on HABSBURG (April, 1998) Those who teach the history of the Habsburg Unfortunately, Berenger's treatment of the Monarchy in the eighteenth and nineteenth cen‐ eighteenth and nineteenth centuries will disap‐ turies surely have need for a new English-lan‐ point many who teach in the feld. The strongest guage survey that would reflect the last three threads running through this volume are those of decades of scholarship. For all its insights and wit, dynastic, diplomatic, and military history. The au‐ A.J.P. Taylor's History of the Habsburg Empire, thor, a professor at the Sorbonne born in 1934, in‐ 1809-1918, frst published in 1948, is out of date tersperses the political and diplomatic narrative and often oversimplified.[1] Barbara Jelavich's with brief treatments of economic development Modern Austria: Empire and Republic, and some of the principal social trends, particu‐ 1815-1986[2] treats much of the nineteenth centu‐ larly those affecting peasants. So casual is the ry in cursory fashion in order to get on to the treatment of social structure, however, that the twentieth century. Robert A. Kann offers much important contrasts are never drawn in the struc‐ more comprehensive coverage both chronologi‐ ture and size of the nobility in Hungary, Galicia, cally and topically in his History of the Habsburg and the Alpine-Bohemian lands. There are brief Empire, 1526-1918.[3] That book, however, is accounts of the major cultural and intellectual nearly a quarter-century old now; and its prose is trends in each period, although Austrian German flat, the treatment of society and economics often culture, particularly in Vienna, gets more atten‐ thin, and the analytic and synthetic points fre‐ tion than the intellectual life of the other national‐ quently underdeveloped. The editors at Addison ities. Berenger generally captures well the person‐ Wesley Longman must have recognized this need ality and primary domestic and foreign political when they undertook publication in two volumes concerns of each ruler and offers clear accounts of a translation of Jean Berenger's Histoire de of the principal political and military crises. Oth‐ l'Empire des Habsbourg, 1273-1918, frst pub‐ erwise, much of the political and diplomatic nar‐ lished in France in 1990.[4] rative will strike younger scholars, even those with strong interests in politics and diplomacy, as H-Net Reviews old fashioned in conceptualization and interpreta‐ process of state-building in which those monarchs tion. were engaged. Berenger includes in his bibliography and Apparently, Berenger believes that the Aus‐ notes some of the most important German-, tro-Hungarian state never really changed much French-, and English-language scholarship on from its basis in early modern Habsburg dynastic diplomatic, cultural, and economic developments politics. In his concluding chapter, after having published through the 1980s. Few Hungarian pub‐ treated World War I and the breakup of the lications and almost no Czech or Polish works Monarchy in the previous chapter, Berenger show up. The fresh accounts of Austro-Hungarian places the focus squarely back on the dynasty and economic development by David Good, John Kom‐ the strengths and weaknesses of the last two em‐ los, Herbert Matis, and Bernard Michel make their perors. Regarding the period from 1867 to 1918, mark here as do various revisionist works from the reader is told that "despite appearances, Aus‐ the last two or three decades on important diplo‐ tria-Hungary remained what the Habsburg matic and military issues. Berenger treats political monarchy had always been, a state resting on the developments more conventionally, and older dynasty, the army, the bureaucracy, and the scholarship seems to have dominated his thinking Church" (p. 212). That statement may hold much on politics. He duly describes the rise of the na‐ truth as a simple generalization, but in the late tional movements and the eventual emergence of nineteenth century, in an era of advanced eco‐ the mass parties, but without a clear sense of the nomic development and widening mass political processes and phases of political mobilization. participation, the institutions of government bu‐ Bruce Garver's 1978 book on the Young Czech Par‐ reaucracy, army, and Church surely were struc‐ ty [5] is cited, but no works by John Boyer, Harm- tured very differently, functioned differently, and Hinrich Brandt, Jiri Koralka, Christoph Stoelzl, or related differently to various parts of the popula‐ Otto Urban. tion than they had in the seventeenth and eigh‐ Berenger is at his best in describing the teenth centuries. Readers will not learn from dilemmas of the Austrian Habsburg rulers in the Berenger, for instance, that after the 1860s com‐ early and middle eighteenth century in trying to munal councils, district agencies, Hungary's coun‐ hold their lands together and deal with the vari‐ ty assemblies, and the provincial diets and their ous external and internal threats to their power. administrative agencies in Cisleithania all played The dynastic politics, diplomatic duels, and mili‐ important roles, along with the two parliaments, tary challenges of the eighteenth century come in making and implementing various aspects of across vividly; and these issues get generally good public policy. Even if the processes of democrati‐ treatment in the account of the nineteenth centu‐ zation were slow in the Habsburg Monarchy, po‐ ry, as well. Not surprisingly, the role of France litical parties and popular interest groups at the looms larger here than in most survey histories of end of the nineteenth century increasingly pene‐ the Habsburg Monarchy written by Austrian, Eng‐ trated the local, district, and provincial bodies and lish, and American scholars. Berenger treats the forced ministerial officials to deal with them. major domestic policies of the eighteenth-century Democratic, federal reforms of the state were con‐ Habsburg sovereigns and notes some of the ceivable during the fnal decades, at least in Cislei‐ changes they made in government institutions, thania, precisely because of the functioning of lo‐ but he offers little worked-out analysis of the cal, district, and provincial institutions and their changing structure of the state or the larger relations with popular parties and interest groups. 2 H-Net Reviews A little more attention to developments in the It is hard to recommend this book for student lower levels of government would strengthen, in use: for the eighteenth century Charles W. In‐ fact, Berenger's assertions in the fnal chapters grao's The Habsburg Monarchy, 1618-1815 [6] is about the continuing viability of the Habsburg preferable and for the nineteenth century even state and the possibilities for reform even at the with their faults so are the older surveys by A. J. P. very end. He fnds considerable continuing vitali‐ Taylor and Robert Kann. ty in the basic institutions of the Habsburg state Notes through World War I. Berenger supports the argu‐ [1]. A. J. P. Taylor, The Habsburg Monarchy, ment that external factors were to blame for the Eighteen Nine to Nineteen Eighteen: A History of final dissolution: the inability of Emperor Charles the Austrian Empire & Austria-Hungary (London: to get a separate peace, the economic collapse H. Hamilton, 1948; paperback in print: Chicago: caused by the war, the shortsighted determina‐ University of Chicago Press, May 1976). tion of the Entente powers and the United States in 1918 to be done with the Habsburg Monarchy, [2]. Barbara Jelavich, Modern Austria: Empire and the ambitions of some of the nationalist and Republic, 1815-1986 (Cambridge: Cambridge politicians, particularly those in exile. In University Press, 1987). Berenger's view, a democratic, federal reform of [3]. Robert A. Kann, History of the Habsburg the state might have given the monarchy a fresh Empire 1526-1918 (Berkeley: University of Califor‐ start, even as late as the accession of Emperor nia Press, 1974). Charles. [4]. Jean Berenger, Histoire de l'Empire des The presentation of the book also leaves Habsbourg 1273-1918 (Paris: Fayard, 1990). something to be desired. Some useful maps, ge‐ [5]. Bruce M. Garver, The Young Czech Party, nealogical and statistical tables, a chronology, and 1874-1901, and the Emergence of a Multi-Party a glossary of German terms are presented at the System (New Haven: Yale University Press, 1978). back. The author's bibliography is a brief fve [6]. Charles W. Ingrao, The Habsburg Monar‐ pages. The translator, C. A. Simpson, has augment‐ chy, 1618-1815 (Cambridge and New York: Cam‐ ed that with his own bibliographical essay, but bridge University Press, 1994). that runs only to six and one half pages. In a num‐ ber of instances, Simpson, a young British histori‐ Copyright (c) 1998 by H-Net, all rights re‐ an, has failed to fnd the right English terminology served. This work may be copied for non-profit to render accurately the historical sense of educational use if proper credit is given to the re‐ Berenger's French--or to correct his incidental er‐ viewer and to HABSBURG. For other permission, rors. The description in the text of Brahms as "a please contact <[email protected]> and Prussian...who came originally from Hamburg" <[email protected]>. (p. 228) may evoke smiles in Berlin but probably not in Hamburg or Vienna. Copyediting and proofreading are inadequate: there are numerous errors in spelling and in translations, particularly from the various Slavic languages of the Empire. For example, whether originating from Berenger's text or in the course of the translation, a note re‐ ferring to the Hungarian-Croatian compromise calls it the Ugodba rather than _Nagodba.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • The Great Fin-De-Siècle Crisis, 1897–1900
    CHAPTER 2 The Great Fin-de-Siècle Crisis, 1897–1900 In order to understand modern Prague and Czechoslovakia one needs to step back and view them in their context of space and time. Until 1918 this con- text was that of the Habsburg Empire. Prague was merely a provincial capital, Czechoslovakia an exotic concept few people would know or take interest in. What did exist was nationalism, in a German as well as a Czech form, and from the late 1800s also in a Jewish form, Zionism. The Habsburg Empire further provided some rudimentary representative structures and held ‘elections’ for them, as well as slowly reforming the administration to better fit the changing times. In 1867, the Habsburg Empire had been confederated into the Austro- Hungarian ‘Dual Monarchy,’ presided over by the Habsburg rulers in a per- sonal union as Austrian emperors and Hungarian kings. The exact political and economic relationship between the Cisleithenian Austrian and the Transleithenian Hungarian entities of the empire, however, was to be rene- gotiated every ten years. This eccentric compromise hurled the country into a political crisis in regular ten-year intervals, and ultimately rendered it politi- cally dysfunctional. That development was not without interest to Budapest— and Berlin—and precipitated Austria-Hungary’s disintegration.1 The Bohemian and Moravian Language Ordinances of 1897, which triggered the great fin-de-siècle crisis, were side effects of the negotiations of the Austro- Hungarian Compromise or Ausgleich. In 1896, the time had come to prepare for the third time for Austrian-Hungarian negotiations to begin in the next year, and Cisleithenian Prime Minister Feliks Kazimierz Count Badeni set out to design a stable new government for this purpose.
    [Show full text]
  • The German National Attack on the Czech Minority in Vienna, 1897
    THE GERMAN NATIONAL ATTACK ON THE CZECH MINORITY IN VIENNA, 1897-1914, AS REFLECTED IN THE SATIRICAL JOURNAL Kikeriki, AND ITS ROLE AS A CENTRIFUGAL FORCE IN THE DISSOLUTION OF AUSTRIA-HUNGARY. Jeffery W. Beglaw B.A. Simon Fraser University 1996 Thesis Submitted in Partial Fulfillment of The Requirements for the Degree of Master of Arts In the Department of History O Jeffery Beglaw Simon Fraser University March 2004 All rights reserved. This work may not be reproduced in whole or in part, by photocopy or other means, without the permission of the author. APPROVAL NAME: Jeffery Beglaw DEGREE: Master of Arts, History TITLE: 'The German National Attack on the Czech Minority in Vienna, 1897-1914, as Reflected in the Satirical Journal Kikeriki, and its Role as a Centrifugal Force in the Dissolution of Austria-Hungary.' EXAMINING COMMITTEE: Martin Kitchen Senior Supervisor Nadine Roth Supervisor Jerry Zaslove External Examiner Date Approved: . 11 Partial Copyright Licence The author, whose copyright is declared on the title page of this work, has granted to Simon Fraser University the right to lend this thesis, project or extended essay to users of the Simon Fraser University Library, and to make partial or single copies only for such users or in response to a request from the library of any other university, or other educational institution, on its own behalf or for one of its users. The author has further agreed that permission for multiple copying of this work for scholarly purposes may be granted by either the author or the Dean of Graduate Studies. It is understood that copying or publication of this work for financial gain shall not be allowed without the author's written permission.
    [Show full text]
  • The Rise and Decline of the New Czech Right
    Blue Velvet: The Rise and Decline of the New Czech Right Manuscript of article for a special issue of the Journal of Communist Studies and Transition Politics on the Right in Post-Communist Central and Eastern Europe Abstract This article analyses the origins, development and comparative success centre-right in the Czech Republic. It focuses principally on the the Civic Democratic Party (ODS) of Václav Klaus, but also discusses a number of smaller Christian Democratic, liberal and anti-communist groupings, insofar as they sought to provide right-wing alternatives to Klaus’s party. In comparative terms, the article suggests, the Czech centre-right represents an intermediate case between those of Hungary and Poland. Although Klaus’s ODS has always been a large, stable and well institutionalised party, avoiding the fragmentation and instability of the Polish right, the Czech centre- right has not achieved the degree of ideological and organisational concentration seen in Hungary. After discussing the evolution and success of Czech centre-right parties between 1991 and 2002, the article reviews a number of factors commonly used to explain party (system) formation in the region in relation to the Czech centre- right. These include both structural-historical explanations and ‘political’ factors such as macro-institutional design, strategies of party formation in the immediate post-transition period, ideological construction and charismatic leadership. The article argues that both the early success and subsequent decline of the Czech right were rooted in a single set of circumstances: 1) the early institutionalisation of ODS as dominant party of the mainstream right and 2) the right’s immediate and successful taking up of the mantel of market reform and technocratic modernisation.
    [Show full text]
  • Later and Different: the Development of Czech National Institutions in Moravia, 1848-1905
    LATER AND DIFFERENT: THE DEVELOPMENT OF CZECH NATIONAL INSTITUTIONS IN MORAVIA, 1848-1905 BY JESSICA ANNE PRESTLEY THESIS Submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Arts in Russian, East European, and Eurasian Studies in the Graduate College of the University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, 2010 Urbana, Illinois Adviser: Assistant Professor David L. Cooper ABSTRACT The Czech national movement in Moravia has been ignored by historians as a topic for inquiry. Although Bohemia and Moravia have shared a similar historical trajectory and close ties, there remains a lack of English-language scholarship on the dissemination of the Czech national identity in Moravia. While the establishment of cultural and political institutions was delayed, the case of Moravia is not a simple carbon copying and implementing of Bohemian-style institutions without consideration of the special regional environment. This work will attempt to provide the reader with an overview of the Czech national movement in Moravia between 1848 and 1905 by analyzing institutional and political development. ii ACKNOWLEDGMENTS First and foremost, I would like to extend my gratitude to my adviser, Professor David Cooper, for his guidance, support, and patience throughout this project. His assistance during the writing process and correcting numerous Czech translations were invaluable. He provided encouragement on my endeavor to learn more about the unexplored history of Moravia during the nineteenth century. Without his support, this thesis would not have been possible in its end form. I would also like to thank Professor Maria Todorova for conducting an independent study course, allowing me to more closely examine the Czech national movement in Bohemia.
    [Show full text]
  • ABSTRACT This Master's Thesis Is Depicting the Development of The
    ABSTRACT This Master’s thesis is depicting the development of the National Liberal Party, from the earliest stage in the 1860s, up to the year 1914. This depiction is based on expert texts as well as historical and political science literature. The thesis is focused on the political background in Austria and subsequently also Austria-Hungary. The historical part of the thesis is primarily focused on the absolute regime, as well as the national efforts to liberalize the constitutional and political demands. A standalone part of the thesis is dedicated to the division between the Old Czech Party and the Young Czech Party, primarily focusing on their political differences and shared nationalism. The establishment of the National Liberal Party in 1874 was followed by its political and agenda development. The political development is depicted in its election results, as well as its functioning in the parliament of Cisleithania. Since 1879, both the Old Czech Party and the Young Czech Party participated in defending the human rights in Vienna’s Czechen-Club. The year 1891 brought about a large change when the National Liberal Party won in the election against the National Party and so became the hegemon of Czech politics. This thesis pays special attention to the work of the Young Czech Party in the Národní listy newspaper. Among this daily journal, the thesis also follows other important periodicals of the 19th Century, which contributed to the political development of that time. The heart and soul of the political development are the figures connected with the Young Czech Party. Among Eduard and Julius Gregrs, it is also Tomas Garrigue Masaryk and Karel Kramar, with their political beliefs contrasting to those of Gregrs.
    [Show full text]
  • Martin Schulze Wessel CZECH ANTI-SEMITISM in THE
    Martin Schulze Wessel CZECH ANTI-SEMITISM IN THE CONTEXT OF TENSIONS BETWEEN NATIONAL AND CONFESSIONAL PROGRAMS, AND THE FOUNDATION OF THE CZECHOSLOVAK NATIONAL CHURCH One might assume that the founding of the Czechoslovak National Church in 1920, which foUowed the founding of a Czechoslovak national State, was a prominent landmark in the history of Czech anti-Semitism. To State this unequivocally right away - this is not the case: The Czechoslovak National Church, which originated in a schism of the Catholic church, was by no means a stronghold of anti-Semitism. One can rather State that its rise to the position of second largest confession in Czechoslovakia (the Catholics still being the largest denomination) was closely linked to the decline in anti-Semitism within the population of Czechoslovakia.1 What needs to be explained, then, is not a rise of anti-Semitism, but rather the opposite: The Czechoslovak Church was founded by a social group that was among the most anti-Semitic in Bohemia: the lower Catholic clergy. And they mainly ap- pealed to the Czech urban middle class, which had proven to be especially prone to anti-Semitism around the end of the 19' Century. Nonetheless, after 1920 the leading representatives of the church cannot be aeeused of programmatic anti-Semitic State­ ments, or even of the anti-Semitic stereotypes current at that time.2 Frankl, Michal: Český antisemitismus 1879-1900 v mezinárodním kontextu [Czech Anti- Semitism 1879-1900 in an International Framework]. Praha 2006 (manuscipt). - Čapková, Kateřina: Češi, Němci, Židé? Národní identita Židů v Čechách 1918-1938 [Czechs, Germans, or Jews? The National Identity of Jews in the Bohemian Lands, 1918-1938].
    [Show full text]
  • Czech Feminists and Nationalism in the Late Habsburg Monarchy: "The First in Austria"
    Czech Feminists and Nationalism in the Late Habsburg Monarchy: "The First in Austria" Katherine David Journal of Women's History, Volume 3, Number 2, Fall 1991, pp. 26-45 (Article) Published by Johns Hopkins University Press DOI: https://doi.org/10.1353/jowh.2010.0081 For additional information about this article https://muse.jhu.edu/article/362995/summary Access provided by University of South Dakota (26 Aug 2018 21:14 GMT) Czech Feminists and Nationalism in the Late Habsbltrg Monarchy: "The First in Austria"1 Katherine David The concurrence of the Czech women's emandpation movement with the rockiest stretch of the nationality conflid in the Austrian half of the Habsburg Monarchy presented no quandary to Czech middle-class femi- nists. As a non-dominant nationality seeking greater rights and autonomy in Austria-Hungary, the Czechs were, by the last four decades of the nineteenth century, intermittently locked in parliamentary altercations with their German political adversaries and the Austrian authorities. In the provinces of Bohemia and Moravia, where Czechs constituted approxi- mately two thirds of the population, Czech life revolved around a struggle for cultural and economic ascendancy, or at least equality with the ethnic German minority.2 While it might be expeded that the demand for national unity in the period between 1890 and World War I would have collided with the aspirations of Czech feminists, in fact, it did not. As this study of the women's movement demonstrates, women's rights activists drew strength from their identification with the Czech national movement and viewed their Czechness as, in many respects, advantageous to their strug- gle as women.
    [Show full text]
  • Open Full Article
    The Czech Question: People and Events The Old Czechs The earliest Czech political party was established in the beginning of the 1860s as a con- servatively oriented party of entrepreneurs and landowners. Among its founders were the historian, František Palacký, the politician František L. Rieger and the lawyer, František A. Bare. Although its official name was The National Party, the delineation, ‚Old Czech‘, became part of the political jargon as a result of the clash of opinions concerning its programme and strategy in 1893. The party programme had as its basis the Czech Historical State Law, thus allowing for co-operation with the Czech historical nobility. The last leader of the party was K. Matteš, who, from the early 1890s, was steadily to lose power. With the beginning of the Czechoslovak Republic, the Old Czech (along with other political parties), joined the Czechoslovak National Democratic Party. The Young Czechs Originally, they formed the liberal-democratic wing of the National Party (the Old Czechs), from which they separated after a heated debate at the Congress at the end of 1864. The Young Czechs also endorsed the Historical State Law, but rejected the Old Czechs’ programme of passive national resistance, stressing instead economic liberalism, civic equality and self-government. They were profiled as national and anticlerical. The founders of the Young Czech Party were Julius Grégr, Karel Sladkovský and Josef Barák. Karel Kramáø and Alois Rašín, two of its last leaders, adopted a strong anti-Austrian stance during the First World War and belonged to the central organ of the home revolt which carried out intelligence and conspirative operations in the Czech lands (i.e.
    [Show full text]
  • The Habsburg Legacy: Rokkanian Perspectives on East Central European Politics Between the Two Wars
    Review of History and Political Science June 2014, Vol. 2, No. 2, pp. 29-61 ISSN: 2333-5718 (Print), 2333-5726 (Online) Copyright © The Author(s). 2014. All Rights Reserved. Published by American Research Institute for Policy Development The Habsburg Legacy: Rokkanian Perspectives on East Central European Politics between the Two Wars Vit Simral1 Abstract The work adds to the discussion on the nature of the Habsburg legacy in the politics of East Central Europe. It focuses on the development of the formal constitutional framework and on the development of party systems in Austria-Hungary and its successor states of the interwar period. Drawing on the theoretical concepts of Lipset and Rokkan, the work searches for differences between the timing of democratisation in individual regions of the Habsburg Empire and establishes how these differences affected the formation of socio-political cleavages. Furthermore, it highlights the major features of successor states’ party systems that were carried over from the era of the Habsburg Empire. The Interpretations of Imperial Legacies In his award-winning conference paper, Herbert Kitschelt (1999) claims that it was particularly the developed professional state apparatus carried over from the Austro-Hungarian era that caused the relative success of the Czech post-communist democratisation. “Because of the remnants of bureaucratic professionalism [that originated in the absolutist polity of the Habsburg Austria], opportunities for the post-communist "privatization" of the state by old party operatives or new tycoons were most limited and public capabilities to advance market liberalization were greatest” (Kitschelt 1999: 25). Other post-communist countries that before 1918 belonged to the Habsburg Empire, such as Hungary, Slovakia, Slovenia and Croatia, Kitschelt classes as a group of countries where “a patrimonial non-professional bureaucracy prevailed into the interwar period” (ibid.).
    [Show full text]
  • The Impact of the Political Regimes on the Interpretation of the Proto- Czechs, the Oldest Generation of the Czech Elites and the Interwar Czechoslovak Elites
    SWS INTERNATIONAL SOCIETY SWS Journal of Social Sciences and Art ISSUE 3, 2020 SWS Journal of Social Sciences and Art THE IMPACT OF THE POLITICAL REGIMES ON THE INTERPRETATION OF THE PROTO- CZECHS, THE OLDEST GENERATION OF THE CZECH ELITES AND THE INTERWAR CZECHOSLOVAK ELITES Assoc. Prof. Dr. Lucie Cviklová Philosophical Faculty, University of Hradec Králové, Czech Republic https://doi.org/10.5593/sws.iscss.2020.7.1/s01.03 ABSTRACT The role of the Proto-Czechs, the oldest generation of the elites and the interwar elites in the national memory can be advanced by showing the examples of the impact of the political regimes on the interpretation of the symbolic role of the individual elite members. The contribution draws on those concepts and methodological approaches that have been employed by the number of historians and historical sociologists such as historical consciousness, collective (social) memory and national memory; a major incentive for choice of the individual elite members were several sociological researchers on the Czech elites. The pluralist debates about the impact of the Czech elites and their contributions were launched in the Austro-Hungarian Empire and developed by the several generations of the Czech and the foreign historians. This thesis about the impact of the political regimes on the interpretation of the contributions of the Czech elites can be illustrated by (1)the current importance of the Proto-Czech elites such as Saint Wenceslaus I. [Svatý Václav], (Saints) Cyril and Methodius, Božena Němcová and Karel Havlíček Borovský, (2)the popularity of the members of the interwar political elite such as the economist Alois Rašín, the journalist Milena Jesenská, the politician Františka Plamínková and the diplomat Zdeněk Fierlinger, (3)the positive and negative reponse to the actions of the communist elites such as Rudolf Slánský, Klement Gottwald, Alexander Dubček and Gustav Husák and (4)the evaluation of the members of the communist counter-elite and later democratic elite such as Václav Havel and Petr Pithart.
    [Show full text]
  • Without Remorse: Czech National Socialism in Late Habsburg Austria'
    Habsburg Miller on Kelly, 'Without Remorse: Czech National Socialism in Late Habsburg Austria' Review published on Tuesday, April 1, 2008 T. Mills Kelly. Without Remorse: Czech National Socialism in Late Habsburg Austria. New York: Columbia University Press, 2006. iii + 235 pp. $40.00 (cloth), ISBN 978-0-88033-586-7. Reviewed by Daniel Miller (Department of History, University of West Florida)Published on HABSBURG (April, 2008) Exploring the Nature of Nationalism and Socialism in Czech NationalSocialism Without Remorse by T. Mills Kelly, associate professor of history at George Mason University, is a valuable addition to Habsburg and Czech studies. Based on his dissertation that he completed in 1996 at George Washington University, the book analyzes the development of the Czech National Socialist Party in the Bohemian Crownlands during the closing years of the Habsburg Monarchy. In the first two chapters, Kelly provides an introduction to politics, economics, and society in the Bohemian Crownlands; and in the subsequent five chapters, he examines the efforts of National Socialists to build their party, appeal to voters, confront their political opponents, and have an impact on Vienna's policy with respect to the Bohemian Crownlands. In his research, Kelly employed some archival materials, but he relied most heavily on periodicals and published primary sources. The National Socialist Party emerged from the Social Democratic Party in the spring of 1897 because of the strong presence of Jews in the latter party, its attention to workers in large industry at the expense of those in smaller manufacturing concerns, its doctrine of proletarian internationalism, and its rejection of the notion that the Kingdom of Bohemia should regain its state rights from the Habsburgs.
    [Show full text]
  • Musical Institutions and Czech Identity in Nineteenth
    Reclaiming a Golden Past: Musical Institutions and Czech Identity in Nineteenth-Century Prague By © 2019 Amelia Davidson PhD, Musicology, 2019 M.M., Missouri State University, 2008 B.M.E., Missouri State University, 2006 Submitted to the graduate degree program in Musicology and the Graduate Faculty of the University of Kansas in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy. Chair: Ketty Wong Roberta Freund Schwartz Paul Laird Alan Street Svetlana Vassileva-Karagyozova Date Defended: April 8, 2019 ii The dissertation committee for Amelia Davidson certifies that this is the approved version of the following dissertation: Reclaiming a Golden Past: Musical Institutions and Czech Identity in Nineteenth-Century Prague Chair: Ketty Wong Date Approved: iii Abstract This dissertation explores the relationship between nineteenth-century musical activity in the Czech lands and Czech identity. The objectives of this study are to examine the history of significant musical institutions and organizations established during the nineteenth century, to analyze performance repertories for these entities, and to explore how the activities of these institutions are related to other components of Czech identity. I begin by investigating significant Czech identity markers that existed prior to the nineteenth century. These include a sense of cosmopolitanism established during the reigns of the Holy Roman Emperors Charles I and Rudolf II, a priority on religious reform and tolerance linked to the Hussite period, and a sense of cultural deprivation stemming from the conclusion of the Thirty Years’ War and the Counter- Reformation period. These foundational elements of Czech cultural identity provided the framework for the national revival of the late eighteenth and early nineteenth century, which was based in Enlightenment ideals, and for the nationalist movement of the mid-nineteenth century.
    [Show full text]