Monorail, Satellite City District, Uniform System Mass Transport in the Cities

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Monorail, Satellite City District, Uniform System Mass Transport in the Cities International Journal of Traffic and Transportation Engineering 2017, 6(2): 36-42 DOI: 10.5923/j.ijtte.20170602.03 Satellite Boroughs Connection Vladimír Strakoš1, Michal Novák2,3,* 1Supervisor of Doctoral Studies, College of Logistics, Commercial Benefit Corporation, Přerov, Czech Republic 2Combined Studies Doctoral Student of the Faculty of Transportation Sciences, Department of Logistics and Management of Transport, Czech Technical University in Prag, Czech Republic 3Dispatcher Passenger Traffic for the Region Bohemia, Czech Railways, Inc., General Directorate, O 11 – Department of Control Operation of Personal Transport, Czech Republic Abstract The aim of this article is to introduce to the non-professional and professional public the use of monorail as a vehicle for connection of the satellite city districts. The issue of the article is to show how can be different routes monorail boroughs connected with a uniform system of public transport between residents and work places. The combination of satellite boroughs via monorail provides its potential users quality and fast transport between the residences and work places. The system relieves congested roads; it also provides the availability of more urban parts of one or more cities and, ultimately contributes significantly to the environmentally friendly solution for public transport in cities. With the use of solar energy it will also ensure environmental friendliness over each individual point of the line´s length. The main contribution of the paper is to draw out a possible solution for public transport by using the existing modes of transport known today to resolve the temporal and convenient access to employment in urban areas without the inefficient solutions to individual automobile transport. Keywords Monorail, Satellite city district, Uniform system mass transport in the cities 1. Introduction with authorities and companies which provide employment From the historical development of the town developed, opportunity. especially in the second half of the last century so that it The journey to and from work often form a significant was the character and amenities of the city in the past and part, to some extent working hours and thus decreasing the on the outskirts of the settlements were built of time for fulfillment of activities related to human life in the prefabricated buildings with many residents in a relatively family and also a time for recreation and relaxation. small space. It is due to advances in engineering and the These effects on human life in society still increasing desire of young people to live as early as possible in their important factor and that is that it increases the speed of own homes. Therefore, manufacturing companies and the cars, increases the speed of public transport, but these historic core with a smaller population often left middle benefits is virtually impossible to use due to the necessity of marginal settlements. limiting the speed of movement of vehicles moving on There was, however a different time, a different trend, roads. which began to be built on the outskirts of cities such After considering all of these options comes to the fore production less demanding on heavy machinery or logistics the fact that the distance between the residence and place of warehouses for temporary storage of delivered goods before work is evaluated mainly by the time that citizen spends on shipping it to stores for residents. the way to and from work, and practically it does not matter With rising living standards are increasingly developing the distance. On the basis of this conclusion emerges the in people the desire for a private house with a beautiful question of how humans organize transportation to and garden and swimming pool and if possible away from the from work and still allow him to live in his house with its bustling city. But this is in contrast with the length of garden and swimming pool. transportation to work and therefore are increasingly Virtually the only option for cases where a person has growing number of cars used for commuting to work. Thus come every day to work, to ensure rapid transport. Of overloads road links around the villa area and the city center course, we can also consider the possibility of speeding traffic passenger cars, but it is not against protecting the * Corresponding author: [email protected] (Michal Novák) environment that we have all the best. The following is one Published online at http://journal.sapub.org/ijtte of several proposals for equipment transport links so that Copyright © 2017 Scientific & Academic Publishing. All Rights Reserved the guy spent the shortest time getting to and from work. International Journal of Traffic and Transportation Engineering 2017, 6(2): 36-42 37 2. Monorail The system itself keeping monorail is monorail either unidirectional or bidirectional or two tracks are run in Monorail is a single-track railway line where vehicles run parallel for each direction. Monorail is used mainly in big on only one rail. Usually the rail is mounted on an artificially cities, because it saves space on the streets and most can be elevated place and concrete columns. The term monorail is a built later when the streets are already completely full of combination of English words mono (single) and rail (rail other modes of transport. Monorail, unlike other railway transport) and used since 1897, when this idea came up vehicles driving on the tires and does not use a pantograph on German engineer Eugen Langen. His idea was to hang over the roof, but the jar on the chassis. the tram in the street and a project called Einschieniges From the perspective of residents have compared the Hängebahnsystem Eugen Langen. Based on this idea started monorail trains, buses and cars of some benefits. They are English engineers simply use the name of the monorail. ten or more meters above the city streets, not tied to the In today's colloquial word monorail used for any form of traffic lights, move between cars and avoid intersections and elevated railways both for transporting passengers in traffic jams. vehicles or factories for the transport of materials and While trains, cars, buses or cyclists can interfere with each supplies in the suspended state, so. suspended transport. other, so the monorail has space to move. The accident with Monorail for passenger transport is mainly used for rapid another mode of transport, for example, encounters an transport from the city center to the airport, which replaces obstacle is almost completely eliminated. Unlike the the bus or metro. underground railroad and kept in urban areas below the Vehicles monorail (Monorail) appear mostly as light rail surface, the passengers do not suffer from claustrophobia vehicles and drivers can be occupied or vacant and remote and the rest can enjoy a tour of the surface with views and controlled computer. The actual usage is multiple. sunlight. Passengers also have a better overview of their Transportation cab may be used either alone as a light rail planned transfers, from preparation to transfer to view while vehicle in the manner of a bus, or as separate units articulated, traveling on a trip with views of the monuments. It also is not or combine to form a train of multiple units. This advanced necessary to install air conditioning units and safety transportation system used as a rapid transit monorail system measures for moving underground, because just slightly is driven by a linear induction motor mounted in the chassis, open window. which also serves as a support element of skeletal fixation This measure also eliminates unnecessary weight increase element booths and the whole kit Monorail. kit monorail. The greatest advantages of monorail is powered on electricity with zero emissions along the track and minimum vibration damped tires on a straight rail. Figure 1. Classic monorail and underslung monorail Unlike some trams and light rail systems, modern monorails are designed and built to always separate from other kinds of transport systems and I are separated from pedestrians on the streets. Figure 3. Monorail completely frees up space in the streets and in the parks 2.1. History The first monorail was made in Russia in 1820 (Ivan Elman). Attempts have been made to create a monorail as an alternative to conventional rail. Probably the earliest was patented monorail (Henry Palmer) in the UK in 1821 and for the transportation of stone from the quarry. One of the first systems put into practical use was the proposal of the French engineer Charles Lartigue transport between Ballybunion and Listowel in Ireland in 1888th. High speed monorail using the Lartigue system was designed in 1901 and between Liverpool and Manchester. Figure 2. Chassis monorails (left) and the interior cabin space (right) In 1910, Alaska was proposed in Brennan gyroscopic 38 Vladimír Strakoš et al.: Satellite Boroughs Connection monorail and was considered for the transportation of the several cities and is used for mass and rapid transportation of coal mine. passengers. Mumbai Monorail is the first one. The first half of the 20th century brought many other proposed projects that either never left the drawing board, or implement short prototypes. One of the first monorails in the United States was built in New York at the beginning of the year. In 1930, but the high cost of the operation was halted relatively soon. In Japan Iron style was built by Lockheed Monorail (Odakyu Mukogaoka - Yuen Monorail, Kawasaki, 1966-2001). In the second half of the 20th century, is more extended another monorail. In 1950, a prototype system was designed for speeds of 200 mph on the straights and 90 mph in the arches and was built in Germany. In the same year it designed an innovative system called ALWEG and later the French system SAFEGE.
Recommended publications
  • Appendix a Monorail Database Formatted 1.13.2020.Xlsx
    Appendix A Global Scan Summary Number and Type Location Year Open Length # Stations Ridership (Daily Average) Ridership (Annual) Speed Travel Time Design/Construction Cost Infrastructure Technology/Guidence System of Vehicles Australia, 1989 (Closed 2017) Straddle-beam Steel box beam Broadbeach Australia, Queensland, Sea 1986 1.2 miles 2 17 mph $3M (Australian) 3, 9-car trains Straddle-beam Von Roll Mk II World 500 V AV power, generator provided to clear trains in emergencies. Built to operate 12 minutes (entire Von Roll Type III, 6, Australia, Sydney 1988 (Closed 2013) 2.24 miles 8 70 million (lifetime) 21 mph (average) $55 million USD Straddle-beam autonomously, breakdowns loop) 7-car trains (construction) soon after opening led to $10-15 million USD decision to retain drivers for (demolish) each train Approx. $550,000 dollars Belgium, Lichtaart 1975 1.15 miles 3 4.7 mph 15 minutes Straddle-beam Schwarzkopf (1978) 2021 (proposed Capacity of 150,000 $650 million Brazil, Salvador 12.4 miles 22 Straddle-beam BYD Skyrail estimate) passengers a day (approximately) 54 seven-car trains 500,000 (estimated once fully $1.6 billion (estimated for Brazil, Sao Paulo, 12 min (50 minutes (total once Phase 1: 2016 4.7 miles (out of 17 6 (out of 18 completed) entire project, not clear CITYFLO 650 automatic train Line 15 (Expresso 50 mph (average) end to end once completed), Straddle-beam Phase 2: 2018 miles planned) planned) 40,000 passengers per hour what is included in this control Tiradentes) fully completed) Bombardier Innova per direction amount)
    [Show full text]
  • Optimisation of Traction and Fixing Systems in Suspended Monorails
    This paper is part of the Proceedings of the 15th International Conference on Railway Engineering Design and Operation (CR 2016) www.witconferences.com Optimisation of traction and fixing systems in suspended monorails J. Yunta, D. Fernandez, D. Garcia-Pozuelo, V. Diaz, B. L. Boada & M. B. Ramírez Departamento de Ingeniería Mecánica, Instituto para la Seguridad de los Vehículos Automóviles (ISVA), Universidad Carlos III de Madrid, Spain Abstract Means of transport are a key point in the development of countries and the population interconnection, so the continuous improvement of them is an obligation and a challenge as well. The mean of transport selected for improvement is the monorail, which serves as a single rail track to transport cargo or passengers. In most cases, the monorail drives around suspension, but can also drive at ground level or tunnels. The aim of this work is the analysis of the optimisation design and technical feasibility of the traction and fixing systems of the monorail. A comparative technical analysis of these systems has been carried out to quantify them, assessing the strengths and weaknesses. Once the system idea to develop and optimise is defined, basic parameters and characteristics of the system are detailed, commercial elements are selected and a traction-fixing system model is modelled. The traction-fixing system has also been optimised with various loading limited conditions like static, modal and thermal analysis. FEM with Abaqus/CAE and CAD-CAM modelling with AutoCAD have been used in this work. Keywords: suspended monorail, optimisation, comparative technical analysis, design alternative, FEM, computer simulations, 3D modelling. 1 Introduction The monorail is a mean of transport in which carriages are moved in suspension or on a single rail structure and they are used for carrying passengers or cargo [1].
    [Show full text]
  • Table of Contents
    DMJM+HARRIS Monorail Technology Assessment TABLE OF CONTENTS LIST OF FIGURES 6 LIST OF TABLES 6 1.0 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 7 2.0 PURPOSE OF ASSESSMENT 12 3.0 SCOPE OF WORK 12 4.0 METHODOLOGY 12 5.0 INITIAL SCREENING OF TECHNOLOGIES 14 5.1 Insufficient Information Available for Determination 14 5.2 Systems No Longer Marketed 14 5.3 System Characteristics Inconsistent with Needs of Montgomery County 15 5.4 Systems Recommended for Further Evaluation 16 5.4.1 Systems in Operation 16 5.4.2 Systems in Development 16 5.5 Classification of Candidate Systems 17 6.0 REFINEMENT OF LIST 18 7.0 MEASURES OF EFFECTIVENESS 24 8.0 COMPARISON BETWEEN MODES OF TRANSPORTATION 25 8.1 Overview 25 8.2 Proposed Measures of Effectiveness 25 8.2.1 Capacity 25 8.2.2 Speed 25 8.2.3 Cost 25 8.3 Other Factors 26 12/18/2001 Final 2 DMJM+HARRIS Monorail Technology Assessment 8.3.1 Automation 26 8.3.2 Expandability 26 8.3.3 Maintenance 26 8.3.4 Yard and Shop 26 8.3.5 Safety 26 8.3.6 Compatibility 26 8.3.7 Maneuverability 27 8.3.8 Visual impacts 27 9.0 PROJECT REVIEW TEAM INPUT 27 9.1 General Concerns Regarding Monorail Technologies 27 9.2 Evaluation of Measures of Effectiveness 28 10.0 SYSTEMS REVIEWED IN DETAIL 28 10.1 OTG HighRoad 28 10.1.1 Background/System Description 28 10.1.2 Existing Locations 28 10.1.3 Vehicle/Guide way/Station Description 28 10.1.4 Capacity 30 10.1.5 Costs 30 10.1.6 Feasibility 30 10.1.7 Environmental Considerations 31 10.2 Futrex 32 10.2.1 Background/System Description 32 10.2.2 Existing Locations 32 10.2.3 Vehicle/Guide way/Station Description 32
    [Show full text]
  • GUIDEWAY DESIGN and FABRICATION METHOD for the SPARTAN SUPERWAY a MS Project Presented to the Faculty of the Department of Mecha
    GUIDEWAY DESIGN AND FABRICATION METHOD FOR THE SPARTAN SUPERWAY A MS Project Presented to The Faculty of the Department of Mechanical Engineering San José State University In Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree Master of Science By Liwei Lu 12th Dec 2020 GUIDEWAY DESIGN AND FABRICATION METHOD FOR THE SPARTAN SUPERWAY By Liwei Lu APPROVED BY THE DEPARTMENT OF MECHANICAL ENGINEERING SAN JOSÉ STATE UNIVERSITY Dec 2020 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------- Burford Furman, Ph.D. (Chair) ----------------------------------------------------------------------------- Ron Swenson, International Institute of Sustainable Transportation ----------------------------------------------------------------------------- James Mokri, Lecturer of ME Department, SJSU ABSTRACT The preliminary design for the guideway elements was undertaken throughout the semester. Straight guideway beam, curved guideway beam, supporting structure, and heat expansion joint has been modeled and analyzed. The current design for the guideway for SPARTAN Superway project followed the concept of SAFEGE (Société Anonyme Française d' Etude de Gestion et d' Entreprises, named after a French Company) type guideway. It’s a rectangular hollow steel beam with an open bottom, and outside of the hollow steel beams there are ribs that can hold the shape of the guideway from collapsing. Finite element analysis (FEA) method is the main approach when designing the guideway. After the FEA design study, a 0.1-inch wall thickness and 48 inches rib spacing has been determined, which will give the guideway the best performance. FEA study shows that all the guideways and support structures designed have a factor of safety 5.0 or above, and the maximum deflection of all the guideways and supporting structures are fulfilling the L/800 spec. It can also handle a magnitude 6.9 earthquake and a 115mph wind load.
    [Show full text]
  • Considering Monorail Rapid Transit for North American Cities
    Considering Monorail Rapid Transit for North American Cities Ryan R. Kennedy Table of Contents INTRODUCTION............................................................................................................2 PART ONE—Defining Monorail..................................................................................3 A. Monorail Types…3 B. Characteristics of Monorail Technology...7 Conclusion...11 PART TWO—Straddle Monorail Systems and Technology.................................12 A. Aerial Structures...13 B. Straddle Monorail Vehicles...18 C. Straddle Monorail Implementation...25 Conclusion...27 PART THREE—Monorail as Cost-effective Urban Transportation.....................28 A. Monorail Capital Costs...29 B. Comparing Conventional Rail Systems to Monorail...33 Conclusion...40 GENERAL CONCLUSION..........................................................................................42 REFERENCES.................................................................................................................43 Cover Picture: Seattle Alweg Monorail built in 1962. Source: Seattle Times 1 INTRODUCTION Monorails have often been lumped together with flying cars as part of a naïve, cartoonish vision of the future. Despite the immense popularity monorails have had with the general public, this form of transportation has been mainly relegated to world’s fairs and amusement parks. Recently, however, a number of major, transit-grade monorails have either been built or are in the construction or planning phase. Japan is clearly the leader
    [Show full text]
  • International Journal for Scientific Research & Development
    IJSRD - International Journal for Scientific Research & Development| Vol. 3, Issue 03, 2015 | ISSN (online): 2321-0613 Monorail a Guided System Be an Approving Transit System in Developing Countries like India Rewati S. Marathe1 N. D. Hajiani2 1M.E Student 2Associate Professor 1Department of Transportation Engineering 2Department of Civil Engineering 1,2L.D. College of Engineering, Ahmedabad, Gujarat, India Abstract— Transportation systems play a significant role in the early use by Japan. Tokyo Monorail, one of the world's the healthy development and functioning of Communities busiest, averages 127,000 passengers per day and has served from the local to national levels in India. There is need for over 1.5 billion passengers since 1964. Monorails have seen new and improved transportation systems in India. Cities continuing use in niche shuttle markets and amusement play a vital role in promoting economic growth and parks. prosperity. The development of cities largely depends upon Modern mass transit monorail systems use their physical, social, and infrastructure. Commuters in the developments of the ALWEG beam and tyre approach, with cities are faced with acute road congestion, rising air only two suspended types in large use. Monorail pollution, and a high level of accident risk. These problems configurations have also been adopted by maglev trains. cannot be solved without a concise and sound urban Chongqing Rail Transit in China has adopted a unique transport approach, to deal with such problem Monorail is a ALWEG-based design with rolling stock is much wider than good solution. most monorails, with capacity comparable to heavy rail. Key words: Monorail, urban transportation, metro rail, This is because Chongqing is criss-crossed by numerous transit system hills, mountains and rivers, therefore tunneling are not feasible except in some cases (Line 1 and future Line 6) due I.
    [Show full text]
  • Monorail Assessment Report for the I-24 Southeast Corridor
    MONORAIL ASSESSMENT REPORT FOR THE I-24 SOUTHEAST CORRIDOR FINAL REPORT Prepared for: Tennessee Department of Transportation Prepared by: January 2015 MONORAIL ASSESSMENT REPORT FOR THE I-24 SOUTHEAST CORRIDOR Table of Contents OVERVIEW SUMMARY ............................................................................................. OS-1 1.0 INTRODUCTION AND PURPOSE .......................................................................... OS-1 2.0 MONORAIL TECHNOLOGY OVERVIEW ............................................................... OS-2 3.0 KEY OPERATING CHARACTERISTICS ................................................................ OS-3 3.1 Speed .................................................................................................................... OS-4 3.2 Ride ....................................................................................................................... OS-4 3.3 Switching ............................................................................................................... OS-4 3.4 Safety and Evacuation .......................................................................................... OS-4 3.5 Evacuation ............................................................................................................ OS-4 3.6 Rubber Tired Traction and Guidance ................................................................... OS-5 3.7 Energy Consumption ............................................................................................ OS-5 3.8 Acceleration and
    [Show full text]
  • Monorails in Japan: an Overview Publictransit.Us Special Report No
    Monorails In Japan: An Overview publictransit.us Special Report No. 9 Leroy W. Demery, Jr. June 22, 2005 Copyright 2005, Leroy W. Demery, Jr. A web-based publication of P.O. Box 6076 Vallejo, CA. 94591-6076 www.publictransit.us (707) 557-7563 (707) 557-6735 fax Use Policy. Our goal is to make information on publictransit.us widely available. You are welcome to quote and use excerpts from publictransit.us documents, provided you credit the authors. Most documents are posted in HTM or PDF format. Contact us at [email protected] if you need other formats. Just let us know how you plan to use it. Comments and suggestions are also welcome. Monorails In Japan: An Overview June 22, 2005 1 Table of Contents Abstract 4 I. Introduction 5 Notes on Transcription 8 Other Details 8 II. The Monorail Market Niche 11 III. Monorail and Other Modal Specifications 14 IV. Criteria For Application 16 V. Small-Scale Installations 18 東京 Tōkyō 豊島園 Toshima-en amusement park (1951-?) 19 東京 Tōkyō 上野懸垂線 Ueno Suspended Line (Ueno Park) 19 奈良 Nara 奈良ドリームラン Nara Dreamland 20 犬山 Inuyama 20 川崎 Kawasaki 読売(よみうり)ランド Yomiuriland (1964-1978) 21 名古屋 Nagoya 東山公園 Higashiyama Park (1964-1974) 22 川崎 Kawasaki - 向ヶ丘 Mukōgaoka (1966-2000) 23 姫路 Himeji (1966-1974) 24 横浜 Yokohama (1966-1967) 25 大阪Ōsaka - Expo ‘70 (1970) 26 VI. The Large-Scale Prototypes 26 Monorails In Japan: An Overview June 22, 2005 2 東京 Tōkyō 東京モノレール Tōkyō Monorail 26 鎌倉 Kamakura 湘南モノレール Shōnan Monorail 33 VII. Unrealized Plans 35 VIII. Standards Adopted For Supported and Suspended Monorails 39 IX.
    [Show full text]
  • February–July 2015
    February–July 2015 February 13 — Bus carrying 60 passengers struck by freight train in Nuevo Leon State, northeast Mexico, killing at least 16 2 — Toyama City and Toyama Chiho Railway announced passengers and injuring 30 others start of local line and tram line operations under Hokuriku Shinkansen elevated section at Toyama 16 — About 30 tank wagons of freight train hauling petroleum Station from 14-March opening of Hokuriku Shinkansen, derailed in West Virginia, USA, before exploding and with extension of about 160 m from station south catching fire, causing large conflagration and black exit to below elevated section; Toyama City bearing smoke. Evacuation orders issued to nearby residents construction cost with local railway using vertical separation of operations. Plans to elevate conventional 16 — Toshiba announced delivery of 2 DC electric line and link with north exit of Toyama Station as Toyama locomotives (EL120 class) to Nagoya Railroad as first Light Rail delivery to private railway in about 45 years; small 4-axle locomotive shares many parts with electric railcars 3 — Train derailed on Harlem Line of Metro-North Railway at Valhalla suburbs in New York, USA, after hitting car 20 — Mitsubishi Heavy Industries, Mitsubishi Corporation, on line, causing explosion and fire killing 6 people Hitachi Ltd., and Kinki Sharyo, announced order for including driver and injuring 15 others Doha Metro system in Qatar as joint venture with large French maker Thales; 3 lines totalling some 886 km to 4 — Small twin-prop ATR72-600 plane belonging
    [Show full text]
  • Local Government and Innovation for Sustainable Mobility Soichiro Minami
    Local Government and Innovation for Sustainable mobility Soichiro Minami To cite this version: Soichiro Minami. Local Government and Innovation for Sustainable mobility. 2021. hal-03184346 HAL Id: hal-03184346 https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-03184346 Preprint submitted on 29 Mar 2021 HAL is a multi-disciplinary open access L’archive ouverte pluridisciplinaire HAL, est archive for the deposit and dissemination of sci- destinée au dépôt et à la diffusion de documents entific research documents, whether they are pub- scientifiques de niveau recherche, publiés ou non, lished or not. The documents may come from émanant des établissements d’enseignement et de teaching and research institutions in France or recherche français ou étrangers, des laboratoires abroad, or from public or private research centers. publics ou privés. Distributed under a Creative Commons Attribution - NonCommercial - ShareAlike| 4.0 International License FONDATION FRANCE-JAPON DE L’EHESS FFJ DISCUSSION PAPER #21-01 Local Government and Innovation for Sustainable mobility Soichiro Minami (Policy Research Institute for Land, Infrastructure, Transport and Tourism) 2018 FFJ/Valeo Fellow March 2021 Fondation France-Japon de l’EHESS (FFJ) 54, boulevard Raspail 75006 Paris - [email protected] F FFJ Discussion Paper Series #21-01 F March 2021 J D I Local Government and Innovation S for Sustainable mobility C U Soichiro Minami S S I Abstract O N This paper traces the interdependent development cycle of institutions and technology concerning sustainable mobility by analyzing the relationship between innovation and transportation policy in P A local governments. This paper spells out local government solutions to mobility problems using P Sustainable Innovative Mobility Means (SIMM).
    [Show full text]
  • Jai9330@Aol. Com
    Transactions on the Built Environment vol 33, © 1998 WIT Press, www.witpress.com, ISSN 1743-3509 Re-emergence of People Movers A.S. Jakes Jakes Associates, Inc., Jakes Plaza, 1940 TheAlameda, Suite 200, Email: jai9330@aol. com Abstract This paper reviews how various newly-developed People Mover technologies have solved visitor circulation needs in many resort complexes in the United States and selected countries. This approach can be duplicated in many cities worldwide since the level of ridership in environments such as Las Vegas, Nevada frequently exceeds levels typically found in medium-sized transit systems worldwide. We focus particularly on existing proven technologies and specific installations including the following: Ropeway Horizontal Elevators (Mirage, Primadonna, Circus-Circus and Sun City Automated People Mover installations); Monorails (MGM Grand-Bally's Monorail and its expansion plans); Minirails (Prim City Unitrak system); Beltways (Monte Carlo and Bellagio systems under construction); Miscellaneous. While the transit industry still perceives People Movers as an unwelcome novelty and as disturbing the daily routine of conventional transportation planning, the recent re-emergence of innovative, lower-cost People Mover technologies and the resultant successful installations worldwide prove otherwise. Defying the 'laws of gravity' held by a majority of conventional transit consultants may no longer be allowed as millions of satisfied riders continue to praise new technologies. Over 160 'standalone' People Mover technologies (developed to date) are no longer emerging; on the contrary, they have emerged fully, with 17% proven in operation and 22% proven on a test track. Many of the remaining 61% are currently struggling for funding to prove their viability.
    [Show full text]
  • Improving Urban Transportation India
    Urban, suburban, interurban and regional public TRANSPORT TECHNOLOGIES improving the Economy and the Living Standards of the Population in India Once upon a Time Transport in India Feature Article in Pictures by Dr. Frank Wingler, February 2020 ANNEXURE: Picture Gallery of Indian Metro Rail in Operation Urban, suburban, interurban and regional public TRANSPORT TECHNOLOGIES improving the Economy of India and the Living Standards of the Population “Incredible India” is the slogan of the Indian Ministry for Tourism. The often chaotic traffic situation in India is “incredible” for those, who cannot see the hidden rules behind the traffic chaos. Feature Article in Pictures by Dr. Frank Wingler, February 2020 ANNEXURE: Picture Gallery of Indian Metro Rail in Operation 1 Chaotic Traffic in India A Mix of “Para Transit Modes”, Buses, On-Demand Mini-Buses and Rickshaws, Hand pulled Carts, Delivery Goods Transport, individual private Cars, Bikes, Bike-Rickshaws and Pedestrians fighting for a Tournament through clogged Streets I. PREFACE/INTRODUCTION Traffic congestion has increased dramatically in India. Congestion and the associated Slow Urban Mobility can have a huge adverse impact on both the quality of life and the economy. Are all cities in India congested or just some of them? Are Delhi and Mumbai less or more congested than, say, Patna and Varanasi? Are mobility and congestion different within cities across the centre and periphery, and at different times of the day? What does the future hold? – see: Ejaz Ghani :India’s Urban Mobility and Congestion Problem; 01. Oct. 2018, 01:06 AM IST: The State of Urban Mobility in Indian Cities 2 “URBAN MOBILITY” in India`s Mega Cities Chaotic Traffic in Chandni Chowk, Delhi | PTI While the majority of Indian citizens still live in rural areas, last estimated at 70 percent of the total population — cities in India are also growing, with the number of inhabitants currently in the hundreds of millions.
    [Show full text]