DOCSLIB.ORG

Butte County Forest Advisory Committee

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Butte County Forest Advisory Committee BUTTE COUNTY FOREST ADVISORY COMMITTEE __________________________________________________________________________________________ August 24, 2015 - 4:00 P.M. ITEM NO. 1.00 Call to order – Oroville Treasurer-Auditor Conference Room, 25 County Center Dr. next to Ste. 125 2.00 Pledge of allegiance to the Flag of the United States of America (if American flag is present) 2.01 Roll Call - Invited Guests: Randy Gould (District Ranger, Plumas NF), Sarah Reynolds (BCNRCD), Thad Walker (Chico Velo); Mike Crump (Butte Coordinating Committee) Supervisor Doug Teeter __________________________________________________________________________________________ 3.00 Consent Agenda 3.01 Review and approve minutes of 6-22-15 4.00 Agenda 4.01 Self-Introduction of Forest Advisory Committee Members, Alternates, Guests and Public – 5 Min. 4.02 Randy Gould: Plans for the Feather River Ranger District 4.03 Mike Crump & Doug Teeter: Review of status of plans for OHV Grants and future projects – Feather River Ranger District 4.04 Recreational Trails Grants and Grant Planning – Thad Walker and Bicycle Trails/Tourism – discussion (Walker/Shary/Faulkner) – 10 Min. 4.05 Review of meeting with PG&E rep Joe Wilson regarding availability of PG&E grants (Shary)-10 min 4.06 Comment Letter on Forbestown Community Protection and Fuel Reduction Project-Project Description – (Peggy/Mike) – 10 min 4.07 SOPA Review – Current Quarter: Discussion & required FAC action for projects affecting Butte County listed in 2015 SOPA Reports for Lassen and Plumas NF’s. (Chair) 4.08 Workshop - Forest roads/recreational needs: FAC to come up with a proposed plan for Coordinating Committee to work with, in preparation for a coordination session with the Plumas and Lassen NF. Forest Service Plan Considerations: Tourism/Socio-economic impacts, Forestry Management, Grazing, Water, Motorized and non-motorized recreation, access to trailheads, staging areas for horses, motorcycles, OHV. Protection of meadows, streams and other sensitive areas (Peggy/Mike) 4.09 Discussion of standardizing 4:00 – 6:00 meeting time at least through next April. Provides additional Butte County staff support and considers winter darkness coming… (Peggy) 4.10 New Business – considerations for next meeting agenda: Next meeting will be September 28 in Paradise if the Gold Nugget Museum is available. Start time? Discussion/workshop of plan for USFS coordination discussion points to be proposed to CC 4.11 Public Comment (THE COMMITTEE IS PROHIBITED BY STATE LAW FROM TAKING ACTION ON ANY ITEM PRESENTED IF IT IS NOT LISTED ON THE AGENDA.) MOUNT SHASTA – CONCEPTUAL TRAILS PLAN Mt. Shasta Conceptual Trails Plan Funded by a grant from the Shasta Regional Community Foundation November 2013 PREPARED FOR: Mount Shasta Trails Association PREPARED BY: The International Mountain Bicycling Association Trail Solutions Program PO Box 7578 Boulder, CO 80306 MOUNT SHASTA – CONCEPTUAL TRAILS PLAN ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS Mount Shasta Trails Association (MSTA) Mount Shasta Mountain Bike Association (MSMBA) Andrew Braugh, MSTA Eli Newman, MSMBA Carolyn Napper, US Forest Service Arne Hultgren, Roseburg Resources INTERNATIONAL MOUNTAIN BICYCLING ASSOCIATION – TRAIL SOLUTIONS 2 MOUNT SHASTA – CONCEPTUAL TRAILS PLAN TABLE OF CONTENTS I. INTRODUCTION ...................................................................................................................................5 Overview .............................................................................................................................................................. 5 Benefits of Mountain Bicycling .................................................................................................................... 5 II. EXISTING CONDITIONS ....................................................................................................................7 Area Description ............................................................................................................................................... 7 III. CONSTRAINTS AND OPPORTUNITIES .......................................................................................8 Constraints .......................................................................................................................................................... 8 Opportunities .................................................................................................................................................. 10 IV. Ride Center Status ........................................................................................................................ 14 IMBA Ride Centers ......................................................................................................................................... 14 Mt. Shasta Ride Center ................................................................................................................................. 14 Tourism Benefits ............................................................................................................................................ 15 IMBA Ride Center Success Stories ............................................................................................................ 16 V. PROPOSED TRAILS AND FACILITIES ........................................................................................ 18 Trail Construction, Maintenance, and Reclamation Guidelines ................................................... 18 Sustainable Trails .......................................................................................................................................... 18 Existing Routes ............................................................................................................................................... 19 Proposed New Routes .................................................................................................................................. 20 High Priority Routes ..................................................................................................................................... 24 VI. Recommendations ........................................................................................................................ 28 Objectives ......................................................................................................................................................... 28 Recommendations ......................................................................................................................................... 28 Appendix A. CONCEPTUAL TRAILS LISTING ............................................................................... 34 Appendix B. MAPS: PLANNING AREA ............................................................................................ 37 Appendix C. MAPS: PRIORITY ROUTES ........................................................................................ 38 Appendix D. MAPS: PLANNING ZONES ......................................................................................... 44 Appendix E. TRAIL CONSTRUCTION TECHNIQUES .................................................................. 54 Appendix F. Trail Difficulty Rating System ................................................................................ 60 Criteria to Consider ....................................................................................................................................... 61 Trail Rating Guidelines ................................................................................................................................ 62 Appendix G. PROFESSIONAL TRAIL BUILDERS ......................................................................... 64 Appendix H. SAMPLE AGREEMENTS ............................................................................................. 65 Memorandum of Understanding Between IMBA and the USFS ..................................................... 65 Memorandum of Understanding between Hood River County, Oregon and Private Landowners ..................................................................................................................................................... 69 INTERNATIONAL MOUNTAIN BICYCLING ASSOCIATION – TRAIL SOLUTIONS 3 MOUNT SHASTA – CONCEPTUAL TRAILS PLAN Appendix I. STAKEHOLDERS ........................................................................................................... 71 Appendix J. CONSULTED PLANS ..................................................................................................... 72 Appendix K. MOUNTAIN BICYCLING MARKET SEGMENTATION ......................................... 73 Appendix L. CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ACT……………….……...75 INTERNATIONAL MOUNTAIN BICYCLING ASSOCIATION – TRAIL SOLUTIONS 4 MOUNT SHASTA – CONCEPTUAL TRAILS PLAN I. INTRODUCTION Overview Located off of Interstate 5, the City of Mt. Shasta is an incorporated town in Siskiyou County in the Shasta Cascades region of California, at the southwestern foot of Mount Shasta. The mission of the City of Mt. Shasta is to maintain the character and resources of a “small town” community while striking an appropriate balance between economic development and preservation of quality of life. The Mount Shasta Trails Association (MSTA) approached the International Mountain Bicycling Association (IMBA) for the creation of a conceptual trails plan and study of the area. MSTA’s aim is to make the trails surrounding the City of Mt. Shasta an integral part of a healthy
Load more

Recommended publications
  • State of California, County of Siskiyou Board of Supervisors Minutes
    State of California, County of Siskiyou Board of Supervisors Minutes, November 12, 2019 The Honorable Board of Supervisors of Siskiyou County, California, met in regular session this 12th day of November 2019; there being present Supervisors Lisa L. Nixon, Brandon Criss, Michael N. Kobseff, Ray A. Haupt and Ed Valenzuela, County Administrator Terry Barber, County Counsel Edward J. Kiernan, and County Clerk and ex-Officio Clerk of the Board of Supervisors Laura Bynum by Deputy County Clerk Wendy Winningham. The meeting was called to order by Chair Criss. Pursuant to AB23, the Clerk announced that the Board members receive no additional compensation for sitting as members of the Siskiyou County Flood Control and Water Conservation District. Supervisor Nixon led in the salute to the flag of the United States of America. Closed Session - Personnel pursuant to Government Code §54957, conference with legal counsel, existing litigation pursuant to Government Code §54956.9(d)(1), four cases, conference with labor negotiators pursuant to Government Code §54957.6, commenced at 8:33a.m., concluded at 9:59a.m., with no action taken. Report On Closed Session County Counsel Edward J. Kiernan announced that closed session concluded at 9:59a.m., with no reportable action taken. Invocation - Siskiyou County Sheriff Chaplain Keith Bradley provided the invocation. Consent Agenda – Approved. At Supervisor Haupt’s request, items 5C, County Administration’s letter to Union Pacific Railroad supporting the Siskiyou Trail Association designed Mossbrae Falls Access project, and item 5D, County Administration’s Rule 20A Credit Purchase agreement with the City of Weed for the transfer of $1,200,000 of 20A credits (County Allocation) from the County to the City, were pulled from the consent agenda for discussion.
    [Show full text]
  • SISKIYOU COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT July 17, 2019
    SISKIYOU COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT July 17, 2019 AGENDA ITEM NO. 1: ALTES USE PERMIT (UP1802) APPLICANT: Matt & Ruth Altes P.O. Box 1048 Mt Shasta, CA 96067 PROPERTY OWNER: Matt & Ruth Altes P.O. Box 1048 Mt Shasta, CA 96067 PROJECT SUMMARY: The proposed project consists of a use permit to establish an equestrian and event center. LOCATION: The parcel is approximately 9 acres, located at 138 Big Canyon Drive, Mt Shasta, CA 96067, Siskiyou County, California on APN 037-260-510 (Latitude 41°17'05.12"N, Longitude 122°17'52.50"W). GENERAL PLAN: Woodland Productivity ZONING: Highway Commercial (CH) EXHIBITS: A. Proposed Use Permit Findings B. Resolution PC-2019-024 B-1. Proposed Notations and Recommended Conditions of Approval C. Recirculated Draft Initial Study / Mitigated Negative Declaration D. Public Comments Altes Use Permit (UP1802) Page 1 SITE DESCRIPTION The 9-acre project site is located at 138 Big Canyon Drive. The project site is accessed via Big Canyon Drive. The project site is located in an open woodland area. Adjacent parcels are largely developed with residential and commercial uses and the property is near the intersection of Interstate 5 and Highway 89. Figure 1, Project Location PROJECT DESCRIPTION The project is a proposed use permit to bring an existing nine-acre equestrian and special event facility into compliance with County Code as well as to facilitate future development of the site. The facility is currently used for horse boarding/training, riding lessons, trail riding, and outdoor events, such as weddings, parties, and retreats. The use permit would allow these unpermitted uses to continue, as well as allow for training clinics and development of a septic system and two additional structures: 1) a multi- use building containing offices, restrooms, storage, and a caretaker’s residence and 2) a barn for storing hay, tack, and other horse-related materials.
    [Show full text]
  • Agricultural Development in Western Oregon, 1825-1861
    Portland State University PDXScholar Dissertations and Theses Dissertations and Theses 1-1-2011 The Pursuit of Commerce: Agricultural Development in Western Oregon, 1825-1861 Cessna R. Smith Portland State University Follow this and additional works at: https://pdxscholar.library.pdx.edu/open_access_etds Let us know how access to this document benefits ou.y Recommended Citation Smith, Cessna R., "The Pursuit of Commerce: Agricultural Development in Western Oregon, 1825-1861" (2011). Dissertations and Theses. Paper 258. https://doi.org/10.15760/etd.258 This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access. It has been accepted for inclusion in Dissertations and Theses by an authorized administrator of PDXScholar. Please contact us if we can make this document more accessible: [email protected]. The Pursuit of Commerce: Agricultural Development in Western Oregon, 1825-1861 by Cessna R. Smith A thesis submitted in partial fulfillment of the Requirements for the degree of Master of Arts in History Thesis Committee: William L. Lang, Chair David A. Horowitz David A. Johnson Barbara A. Brower Portland State University ©2011 ABSTRACT This thesis examines how the pursuit of commercial gain affected the development of agriculture in western Oregon’s Willamette, Umpqua, and Rogue River Valleys. The period of study begins when the British owned Hudson’s Bay Company began to farm land in and around Fort Vancouver in 1825, and ends in 1861—during the time when agrarian settlement was beginning to expand east of the Cascade Mountains. Given that agriculture
    [Show full text]
  • LAND-USE CONFLICT at SHASTA DAM, CALIFORNIA a Thesis
    THE ROLE OF CRITICAL CARTOGRAPHY IN ENVIRONMENTAL JUSTICE: LAND-USE CONFLICT AT SHASTA DAM, CALIFORNIA A thesis submitted to the faculty of San Francisco State University In partial fulfillment of the requirements for the Degree Master of Arts In Geography by Anne Kathryn McTavish San Francisco, California January, 2010 Copyright by Anne Kathryn McTavish 2010 CERTIFICATION OF APPROVAL I certify that I have read The Role of Critical Cartography in Environmental Justice: Land-use Conflict at Shasta Dam, California by Anne Kathryn McTavish, and that in my opinion this work meets the criteria for approving a thesis submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree: Master of Arts in Geography at San Francisco State University. ____________________________________________________ Nancy Lee Wilkinson Professor of Geography ____________________________________________________ Jerry Davis Professor of Geography THE ROLE OF CRITICAL CARTOGRAPHY IN ENVIRONMENTAL JUSTICE: LAND-USE CONFLICT AT SHASTA DAM, CALIFORNIA Anne Kathryn McTavish San Francisco State University 2010 The United States Bureau of Reclamation (USBR) is conducting a feasibility study to increase the height of Shasta Dam. The Winnemem Wintu Indian Tribe contend that any increase in the storage capacity of Shasta Lake would inundate their remaining cultural and historic sites, tribal lands, and current homestead, an act they describe as “cultural genocide.” Critical Cartography plays a valuable role evaluating the Winnemem Wintu claim, revealing how the tribe’s claim to land was mapped, then unmapped, over the past two-hundred years. I certify that the Abstract is a correct representation of the content of this thesis. ___________________________________________ ________________ Chair, Thesis Committee Date ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS I have been amazed, delighted, appalled, and humbled as I learned about the rights, issues, and status of the Winnemem Wintu.
    [Show full text]
  • The Oregon to California Trail
    Number 109 Fall 2018 The Oregon to California Trail Also Known As The Old Trapper Trail and the Siskiyou Trail By Dee Owens and Richard Silva The Oregon to California Trail, sometimes referred to as the Siskiyou Trail or the Old Trapper Trail, was a trail of commerce from the beginning, one of north and south directions. It was a trail between two territories or countries, British and American to the north and Mexican to the south. It holds the distinction of being the only early trail in northern and central California to have a history of early trapper and animal herding use prior to the main emigration period. It shares this distinction with the trails of the Platt River and other eastern trails. In the north, the trail began at Fort Vancouver, head- quarters of the Hudson’s Bay Company. The current towns of Portland, Salem, Eugene, Grants Pass, and Ashland were near the route in Oregon. In California the trail passed near Yreka, Dunsmuir, Redding and south through the Sacramento Valley to San Francis- Fort Vancouver—1845 co. The Oregon to California Trail developed from early game and Indian trails into a more obvious transporta- tion route due to the large numbers of horses and pack animals in the Hudson’s Bay Brigades going to and from California. Later the demand for animals in the Willamette Valley brought enormous herds of cattle, horses, and sheep over the route, further establishing its presence. The Siskiyou Mountains were first crossed from the south in 1826-27 by the Hudson Bay Company’s Snake Country Expedition, led by Peter Skene Ogden.
    [Show full text]
  • 77 in 2000, the Bureau of Land Management, Klamath National
    GENERAL HISTORICAL ARCHAEOLOGY 77 MMMAKINGAKINGAKING INROADSNROADSNROADS: A PP: ROGRESSROGRESSROGRESS REPORTEPORTEPORT ONONON ANANAN ARCHAEOLOGICAL ANDANDAND HISTORICALISTORICALISTORICAL STUDYTUDYTUDY OFOFOF THETHETHE YREKAREKAREKA TRAILRAILRAIL JAMES BARNES, ERIC W. RITTER, RICHARD SILVA, TAMMY SULLIVAN, JOHN HITCHCOCK, RICHARD JENKINS, AND CLAUDE SINGLETON In 2000, the Bureau of Land Management, Klamath National Forest, and Northern California Resources Center began a collaborative project to study the Yreka Trail/Pitt River Road, one of the earliest trails to penetrate frontier California. The initial goal of our study was to cast light on the lives of emigrants, soldiers, and others who traversed the trail on their way to the goldfields of the Klamath Mountains, the agricultural settlements of the southern Cascades, and elsewhere. After nearly three years of work, we have learned that the trail’s complex archaeological record has much more to offer than insight on the trail’s earliest travelers. This record contains telling clues to long-term changes in land use and rural living since the mid-1800s. n 2000, the Bureau of Land Management, Klamath This was the account of Alonzo Brown as he traveled INational Forest, California Department of by wagon train to Yreka during the 1850s (quoted in Forestry and Fire Protection, and Northern Arnold 1999:97). The route that Brown described in California Resources Center teamed up to begin an his account was the Yreka Trail. Brown was one of archaeological and historical study of the Yreka Trail/ many transcontinental travelers to take this trail, which Pitt River Roadone of the earliest Euroamerican opened in 1852shortly after gold was discovered in trails to penetrate northern California.
    [Show full text]
  • Spring 2021 Newsletter Est
    n u Cou ty M yo us ki e s u i m Friends of the Siskiyou County Museum S spring 2021 newsletter est. 1951 Y a rek rni a, Califo How the Goods Got Here Supplying the 19th Century Gold Miners Our quiet California backwater transformed into a bustling beehive in the decade of the 1850s. A year after the 49ers besieged the Sierra Nevada, a swarm of gold seek- ers came north, overrunning the river banks and filling up the gulches in what must have seemed like no time at all to the Natives. In the previous two decades, they had only occasionally been disturbed by a cattle drive on its way to A snag boat at work on the Sacramento River, keeping the river clear of obstacles for safe shipping. (Orland Historical Society) Oregon, infrequent fur trappers, a couple of government ex- peditions passing through and small handfuls of emigrants industry and little agriculture other than the cattle ranching heading elsewhere. The July 3, 1851 issue of Alta California that stemmed from the Spanish and Mexican eras. There reported that every major drainage in the Klamath/Trinity was some wheat growing that quickly expanded to feed the watershed had been prospected to some extent by the end exploding population, a good thing since miners did love of 1850, and by mid-1851 there were from 5,000 to 10,000 their flapjacks and biscuits. But coastal California was al- miners present, including 1,500 miners on the Salmon ready linked to New England, South America and the Far River alone.
    [Show full text]
  • Bibliographies of Northern and Central California Indians. Volume 3--General Bibliography
    DOCUMENT RESUME ED 370 605 IR 055 088 AUTHOR Brandt, Randal S.; Davis-Kimball, Jeannine TITLE Bibliographies of Northern and Central California Indians. Volume 3--General Bibliography. INSTITUTION California State Library, Sacramento.; California Univ., Berkeley. California Indian Library Collections. St'ONS AGENCY Office of Educational Research and Improvement (ED), Washington, DC. Office of Library Programs. REPORT NO ISBN-0-929722-78-7 PUB DATE 94 NOTE 251p.; For related documents, see ED 368 353-355 and IR 055 086-087. AVAILABLE FROMCalifornia State Library Foundation, 1225 8th Street, Suite 345, Sacramento, CA 95814 (softcover, ISBN-0-929722-79-5: $35 per volume, $95 for set of 3 volumes; hardcover, ISBN-0-929722-78-7: $140 for set of 3 volumes). PUB TYPE Reference Materials Bibliographies (131) EDRS PRICE MF01/PC11 Plus Postage. DESCRIPTORS American Indian History; *American Indians; Annotated Bibliographies; Films; *Library Collections; Maps; Photographs; Public Libraries; *Resource Materials; State Libraries; State Programs IDENTIFIERS *California; Unpublished Materials ABSTRACT This document is the third of a three-volume set made up of bibliographic citations to published texts, unpublished manuscripts, photographs, sound recordings, motion pictures, and maps concerning Native American tribal groups that inhabit, or have traditionally inhabited, northern and central California. This volume comprises the general bibliography, which contains over 3,600 entries encompassing all materials in the tribal bibliographies which make up the first two volumes, materials not specific to any one tribal group, and supplemental materials concerning southern California native peoples. (MES) *********************************************************************** Reproductions supplied by EDRS are the best that can be made from the original document. *********************************************************************** U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • Draft 'Accessible' Trails List
    DRAFT ‘ACCESSIBLE’ TRAILS LIST Disclaimer: THERE IS NO ASSURANCE THAT ANY RESOURCE OR ACTIVITY I'VE FOUND OR DESCRIBE WILL BE AS 'ACCESSIBLE' AS YOU MIGHT NEED. Or information may be out of date. Use the information at your own risk. This is a list of possibilities, not certainties for me to ‘hike’ with my Walk’n’Chair or a wheelchair. Some of these locations I’ve been to, but not others. I keep adding to the list as I find new information. And that’s all it is – a list of possible trails that I might be able to get down and back again using a wheelchair or mobility device. Hike at your own risk. SHASTA COUNTY REDDING AREA TRAILS You may want to start your outdoor adventures with the McConnel Arboretum at Turtle Bay, While there are fees, you could pre-plan to arrive on a low-fee day. It could inspire you to try other places in the Redding Trails system. Plus the Sun Dial Bridge is a famous local landmark with great views of the Sacramento River. If you have kids or just enjoy exhibits, Turtle Bay has lots of interesting stuff. http://expeditionsbytricia.blogspot.com/2011/12/another-mcconnell-expedition.html HealthyShasta.org Maps list: http://healthyshasta.org/maps.htm The Redding area has miles of hiking and biking trails but most of these trails are not wheelchair suitable due to steepness, surface, width or length. The Redding Walks Guide is pretty comprehensive, but somewhat lacking in specific detail for wheelchair or rollator users. Basically, a paved trail ‘should’ be usable by a wheelchair user but there’s no guarantees, and I haven’t found anyone willing to revise the maps to include accessibility information.
    [Show full text]
  • December 2014 Edition
    City Manager Newsletter By TRACKDOWN MANAGEMENT "Providing thread to help stitch together the fabric of the City Management Community" December, 2014 Issue Page | 1 Volume No. 8: Issue No. 20 Yreka Volume No. 8, Issue No. 9 Gilroy Those with Yreka, California Service. Prior to our pause in the "north-bound sequence" to visit Oroville City Manager Randy Murphy, we had arrived in the City of Redding from our stops in Corning and Anderson. Redding is where my second-cousin Tammy Jaramillo-Martinelli and her family live. So now, heading north from Redding, we stop in the historic City of Yreka. Yreka is 21 miles south of the Oregon border. Yreka is the county seat of Siskiyou County, Eric Beebe, Dani Beebe and Jacki "Cookie" Simpson located in the Shasta Valley at an elevation of Beebe of Anthem, Arizona. All three are California 2,500 feet above sea level. It has a current natives. Cookie is a graduate of California State population of about 7,290. The city is 42 mile University, Sacramento, and she earned a teaching south of Medford, Oregon, and 227 miles north credential at California State University, Long Beach. of Sacramento. Eric is in high school and Dani is in middle school. / http / http http http / / http http://www.ocsec.com/ http http://www.ocsec.com/ / / / http.aspx Jack & Susan Simpson, 16707 Gerritt Avenue, Cerritos, CA 90703 O | 562/926-0800 M | 562/896-5424 M | 310/418-1035 www.trackdownmanagement.net | [email protected] | [email protected] City Manager Newsletter By Trackdown Management Page 2 December, 2014 Yreka Trackdown Posse Roster: borah CollinsGregory began Korduner, Retiredher workingCity Manager career in Sausalito as an Administrative Assistant Howard Chambers, Lakewood with an informationMike Egan technology, Norwalk and services firm in 1983.
    [Show full text]
  • 2 Appendix C Cultural Tech Report
    September 9, 2015 PACIFICORP Lassen Substation Project Cultural Resource Survey DRAFT REPORT Siskiyou County, California LEGAL DESCRIPTION: T40N, R4W, SECTIONS 9, 16, 17, AND 21 USGS QUADRANGLE: CITY OF MT. SHASTA, CA. PROJECT NUMBER: 136412 PROJECT CONTACT: Michael Dice EMAIL: [email protected] PHONE: 714-507-2700 POWER ENGINEERS, INC. Lassen Substation Project – Cultural Resource Survey Cultural Resource Survey DRAFT REPORT PacifiCorp Lassen Substation Project Siskiyou County, California PREPARED FOR: PACIFICORP PREPARED BY: MICHAEL DICE 714-507-2700 [email protected] POWER ENGINEERS, INC. Lassen Substation Project – Cultural Resource Survey CONFIDENTIAL This report contains information on the nature and location of prehistoric and historic cultural resources. Under California Office of Historic Preservation guidelines as well as several laws and regulations, the locations of cultural resource sites are considered confidential and cannot be released to the public. ANA 130-227 (PER 02) PACIFICORP (09/16/2015) 136412 YU PAGE i POWER ENGINEERS, INC. Lassen Substation Project – Cultural Resource Survey THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK ANA 130-227 (PER 02) PACIFICORP (09/16/2015) 136412 YU PAGE ii POWER ENGINEERS, INC. Lassen Substation Project – Cultural Resource Survey TABLE OF CONTENTS MANAGEMENT S UMMARY............................................................................................................ 1 1.0 INTRODUCTION ...................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • The Genealogical Society of Siskiyou County, California
    FREE LOCAL INFORMATION GUIDE J E F FER S ON BA C K ROA D S A Happy Little Publication GOD BLESS AMERICA www.JeffersonBackroads.com APRIL 2016 Happy Springtime! Our State of Jefferson is Old School America A Brief History of The State of Jefferson Written by Gail Jenner United We STAND. Today’s State of Jefferson refers to portions of Southern Oregon and Northern California. Originally this region represented the "second half" or "northern mines" of the famous gold rush of 1849-50, but it never received the kind of historical reference that the Sierra Mother Lode did, even though it contributed as much, if not more, to the coffers of the two states. Moreover, the region was easily overlooked after the gold rush, since it continued to be less populated and more rural than the remainder of the two states. Because the people who have settled along the northern boundary of California and the southern boundary of Oregon have always been of an independent nature, it seems fitting that this region has attempted, on numerous occasions, to create a new state, not just in name or principle, but in reality as well. The principle is not a new one, however, but has its roots in the area’s history. In 1852, a bill to create a new state died in committee. On Dec. 19, 1853, THE DAILY ALTA OF CALIFORNIA of San Francisco suggested that Northern California and Southern Oregon could both benefit if a ‘new state’ could be created. Some suggested it be called ‘Klamath.’ Others suggested the name "Jackson." At a meeting held on January 7, 1854, in Jacksonville, Oregon, Lafayette F.
    [Show full text]