DOCSLIB.ORG

{DOWNLOAD} Ulverton

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

ULVERTON PDF, EPUB, EBOOK Adam Thorpe | 432 pages | 07 Jan 2013 | Vintage Publishing | 9780099573449 | English | London, United Kingdom Ulverton by Adam Thorpe A spokesman for the British Geological Survey said that earthquakes of around that magnitude occur roughly once a year in Britain. The name Ulverston , first recorded in the Domesday Book as Ulurestun , is derived from two elements. The loss of the 'W' in Wulfhere can be attributed to the historical Scandinavian influence in the region. The town's market charter granted in by Edward I [10] was for a market every Thursday. Modern Ulverston retains its market-town appearance. Market days are now held on Thursdays and Saturdays. The present-day Saturday market includes in the summer months craft stalls, charity stalls and locally produced wares on "Made in Cumbria" stalls. Town Bank grammar school was established in the town in from a benefaction by Thomas Fell. Historically, the parish included other chapelries or townships that later became separate civil parishes: Blawith , Church Coniston, Egton with Newland , Lowick , Mansriggs , Osmotherley , Subberthwaite and Torver. From to the town served as an urban district in the administrative county of Lancashire. It includes a sixth form college that draws around students from Ulverston and the surrounding areas. Ulverston railway station , a short walk from the town centre, lies on the Furness Line between Barrow- in-Furness and Lancaster , which ultimately leads on to Manchester Airport. All services are operated by Northern. The town is served by several bus services, including the X6 between Kendal and Barrow-in-Furness, via Grange over Sands. The X12 runs from Coniston and passes through the village of Spark Bridge. Ulverston is twinned with Albert in France. Ulverston has various festivals during the year that entitle it to the description "festival town". This event culminates in a stage performance and fireworks in Ford Park. It was organised locally for the first time in Ulverston's football team, Ulverston Rangers, [26] has been in existence since It boasts two good grounds and a full-size grass training pitch. It is the only football team within Ulverston itself. Ulverston A. Players wear a blue with white trim strip with blue shorts and blue socks. It has produced several professional rugby players, including Derek Hadley and Andy Whittle. A parkrun event has been held every Saturday at Ford Park since There is a swimming club at Ulverston Leisure Centre. The triathletes of Ulverston Tri Club are also based there and train there on Saturday mornings. Over the years the town has been the birthplace of several famous people. A monument to him — a replica of the third Eddystone Lighthouse — stands on Hoad Hill overlooking the town. He appeared in The News Quiz , occasionally introduced The Goon Show , and read the spoof "news bulletin" that featured in the middle of the comedy The Men from the Ministry. Despite being entitled The Royal Norwegian Honorary Consulate in Barrow-in-Furness , one of the numerous consulates of Norway is actually located on the outskirts of Ulverston. The town of Ulverstone in Tasmania , Australia is named after Ulverston and similarly built at the mouth of a Leven River. The following people and military units have received the Freedom of the Town of Ulverston. Ok so the good things about this novel I love the sense of the change of time over the centuries in one small village like the changing of the seasons. I also found certain ye olde English extremely trying and just annoying as hell. So by the end I just wanted to finish it not caring if I actually read the last few pages. So ok but not great Although some of the individual passages were well written, I really didn't enjoy this at all. The sections with local dialect were just too challenging to read for very little return to the reader. I like the premise of the book, with the same place featuring through time from 17oo's until the present day, but found it focused more on the people rather than the place and it didn't engage me or give me a sense of the place through time. It's difficult when the sections are so dispara 2. It's difficult when the sections are so disparate and rather obscure. My favourite section was near the end, set at the start of WW1. I thought this was very well written. The very last part is impossible to read on the Kindle version but I tried my best. All in all an unsatisfying read. Jun 11, Beth added it Shelves: couldn-t-finish. This is the first book that I remember not finishing. Honestly, I've not read such self aggrandising, pretentious twattery in my life and I had to do a "literary fiction" module full of angsty white middle aged authors projecting onto their characters at uni. The cover blurb has a Sunday Times reviewer declaring this "A masterpiece" and it It is a powerful exercise in the taking on of different voices, without a doubt-- with each change of era, there is a different narrative point of view, and they are all indeed quite distinct-- but to my slightly low- brow tastes it is wanting in the area of plot. Stuff happens, yes, and there is a nice little quiver in the reader's bosom when events from earlier in the book are referred to later, fr The cover blurb has a Sunday Times reviewer declaring this "A masterpiece" and it Stuff happens, yes, and there is a nice little quiver in the reader's bosom when events from earlier in the book are referred to later, frequently in a distorted form as if authentically passed along by word of mouth, but none of it really has any bearing on what follows. This combined with an occasionally painful patch of phonetic dialogue the end of the s is marked by twenty-eight pages of picturesque rural gibberish with but a single period for punctuation makes it something of an up-hill climb for the reader. It is an impressive exercise, but I'm not sure it's an enriching one. As I say, I'm slightly low-brow in my expectations. One might point out that there is a good depiction of the futility of human ambition, of the ephemerality of human works, and of the paradox of "progress" things get worse because things get better , and that's all true. If that's the sort of thing that you're looking for in a book, and you don't mind the substitution for plot by slices of life, you'll rate this book higher than I. What stars I've given it are mainly for the workmanship; the different voices also give an impression of authenticity to each era, and I do appreciate that. Sadly, despite having looked forward to reading this one I had to give up on it. For those that know me well, they know that I don't give up on books easily and it did take a while to come to this decision. I started the book on the 8th May and by 17th May, I'd only managed to read around a pages. It was as if reading it was a chore and reading should never be a chore in my opinion. When I was in the mood to read or had the time, it wasn't the first book that I picked up and when I did pick i Sadly, despite having looked forward to reading this one I had to give up on it. When I was in the mood to read or had the time, it wasn't the first book that I picked up and when I did pick it up, it was with some reluctance. It's not that it was badly written as it was far from that. I found it well written but it didn't grab me. I'm not a huge fan of short stories and this was basically a series of short stories set over several centuries featuring one fictitious village know as Ulverton, which did have certain variations on the name. If I'd got on with it better this would have been more. View all 4 comments. Jan 31, Leslie rated it it was amazing Shelves: 20th-century- fiction , , short-fiction , favourites. Loved this. It's impressive simply in terms of sheer narrative skill. Each chapter is distinct in form and voice, moving from to , including short story, stream of consciousness, diary entries, epistolary fiction, courtroom depositions, descriptions and annotations for a supposed book of photographs, a transcript for a television documentary. Names and stories weave in and out of individual chapters, with every chapter forcing the reader to rethink earlier stories and implications. And Loved this. And through it all a shifting, wonderfully complex sense of the relationships between place and time, present and history. A masterclass in narrative technique and control of form. Sep 19, Sonja Trbojevic rated it it was amazing. These 12 stories, set in the fictional town of Ulverton, span over 3 centuries of English history, from to An interesting and challenging read, with the final tale taking the reader back to the first one, it is a book to remember. The tales written in dialect reminded me of some of Alan Garner's work. Shelves: s. Ten or so carefully interlocking stories over several centuries of an English village. Difficult going in places, possibly a tiny bit too clever for its own good in others, and one that I think needs at least two reads to fully grasp.
Recommended publications
  • Der Europäischen Gemeinschaften Nr

    Der Europäischen Gemeinschaften Nr

    26 . 3 . 84 Amtsblatt der Europäischen Gemeinschaften Nr . L 82 / 67 RICHTLINIE DES RATES vom 28 . Februar 1984 betreffend das Gemeinschaftsverzeichnis der benachteiligten landwirtschaftlichen Gebiete im Sinne der Richtlinie 75 /268 / EWG ( Vereinigtes Königreich ) ( 84 / 169 / EWG ) DER RAT DER EUROPAISCHEN GEMEINSCHAFTEN — Folgende Indexzahlen über schwach ertragsfähige Böden gemäß Artikel 3 Absatz 4 Buchstabe a ) der Richtlinie 75 / 268 / EWG wurden bei der Bestimmung gestützt auf den Vertrag zur Gründung der Euro­ jeder der betreffenden Zonen zugrunde gelegt : über päischen Wirtschaftsgemeinschaft , 70 % liegender Anteil des Grünlandes an der landwirt­ schaftlichen Nutzfläche , Besatzdichte unter 1 Groß­ vieheinheit ( GVE ) je Hektar Futterfläche und nicht über gestützt auf die Richtlinie 75 / 268 / EWG des Rates vom 65 % des nationalen Durchschnitts liegende Pachten . 28 . April 1975 über die Landwirtschaft in Berggebieten und in bestimmten benachteiligten Gebieten ( J ), zuletzt geändert durch die Richtlinie 82 / 786 / EWG ( 2 ), insbe­ Die deutlich hinter dem Durchschnitt zurückbleibenden sondere auf Artikel 2 Absatz 2 , Wirtschaftsergebnisse der Betriebe im Sinne von Arti­ kel 3 Absatz 4 Buchstabe b ) der Richtlinie 75 / 268 / EWG wurden durch die Tatsache belegt , daß das auf Vorschlag der Kommission , Arbeitseinkommen 80 % des nationalen Durchschnitts nicht übersteigt . nach Stellungnahme des Europäischen Parlaments ( 3 ), Zur Feststellung der in Artikel 3 Absatz 4 Buchstabe c ) der Richtlinie 75 / 268 / EWG genannten geringen Bevöl­ in Erwägung nachstehender Gründe : kerungsdichte wurde die Tatsache zugrunde gelegt, daß die Bevölkerungsdichte unter Ausschluß der Bevölke­ In der Richtlinie 75 / 276 / EWG ( 4 ) werden die Gebiete rung von Städten und Industriegebieten nicht über 55 Einwohner je qkm liegt ; die entsprechenden Durch­ des Vereinigten Königreichs bezeichnet , die in dem schnittszahlen für das Vereinigte Königreich und die Gemeinschaftsverzeichnis der benachteiligten Gebiete Gemeinschaft liegen bei 229 beziehungsweise 163 .
  • SLLC Highways and Transportation Working Group 15 February 2013

    SLLC Highways and Transportation Working Group 15 February 2013

    SLLC Highways and Transportation Working Group 15 February 2013 South Lakeland Local Committee Devolved Capital Programme 2013/14 Appendix 8 Small Highway Improvement Schemes Candidate List RECOMMENDED SCHEMES SHADED GREY Parish Council scheme comments (benefits; land issues and other CCC Electoral Road No. Priority Parish Road Name Settlement Parish Request/Scheme Description Detailed Location potential delivery difficulties; potential Cumbria Highways comments Cost Type Division (if known) Score developer implications; potential funding partners) Improving pedestrian (possibly cycling) and limited mobility accessibility - SLDC LDF. Also, a number of aims of the Rights of Way Improvement Plan (limited mobility, short walks, transport links, and so on). Together with the removal of the kissing gates (above) would then Extend footpath 526003 southwards create a route suitable for all those Preliminary Design - Requires further alongside railway (a track already Grange Grange-over-Sands Footpath Kents Bank Promenade walk extension with limited mobility between Grange- assessment to confirm details and 3000 60 Prep exists for most of the way - but over-Sands and Kents Bank stations. deliverability inaccessible) to Kents Bank Station This would enable those with limited mobility, and others to make flat, level journeys betwen the settlements and facilities - as well as enabling one way journeys with returns by rail. Possibly open to cyclists as well, although one stretch is narrow and would possibly entail pushing (and the right to cycle issue
  • Colton Community Plan 2015

    Colton Community Plan 2015

    COLTON COMMUNITY PLAN 2015 Main photo: Rusland valley looking west towards the Coniston Fells. © Teresa Morris Map: Ordnance Survey. © Crown Copyright 2005 Colton Parish Community Plan 2015 Introduction Topics, Policies and Actions 1. The Local Economy 2. Landscape and the Natural Environment 3. Communities and Well-Being 4. Housing and Other Development 5. Roads, Traffic and Transport 6. Energy and Sustainability Annexes Annex A: Community Plan Working Group Members Annex B: Action Plan Annex C: Community Transport Schemes Map of Colton Parish (back page) 1 Introduction Purpose Community Plans set out the issues that local people value about their neighbourhoods, and their aspirations for the future. They tend to be based on civil parish areas (like Colton) or groups of parishes. It is essential that that such Plans properly reflect the values, opinions, needs and aspirations of the community, and that they should be community-led, facilitated by the Parish Council. Principal authorities (in Colton’s case: Cumbria County Council and South Lakeland District Council) and planning authorities (in Colton’s case: the Lake District National Park Authority), are increasingly using these Plans to guide local policy and inform planning decisions. The purpose of this Plan is to set out policies and action plans for the future of the Parish. To this end, invitations to join a Community Plan Working Group brought together people from all three wards of our large rural parish, including parish councillors and the parish clerk. Working group members and contributors are listed in Annex A. Background Colton Civil Parish is a sparsely populated rural area of about 20 square miles within the southern part of the Lake District National Park, spanning three valleys running north-south: Coniston Water and the Crake Valley to the west, Rusland in the centre and Windermere and the River Leven in the east.
  • Full Proposal for Establishing a New Unitary Authority for Barrow, Lancaster and South Lakeland

    Full Proposal for Establishing a New Unitary Authority for Barrow, Lancaster and South Lakeland

    Full proposal for establishing a new unitary authority for Barrow, Lancaster and South Lakeland December 2020 The Bay Council and North Cumbria Council Proposal by Barrow Borough Council, Lancaster City Council and South Lakeland District Council Foreword Dear Secretary of State, Our proposals for unitary local government in the Bay would build on existing momentum and the excellent working relationships already in place across the three district Councils in the Bay area. Together, we can help you deliver a sustainable and resilient local government solution in this area that delivers priority services and empowers communities. In line with your invitation, and statutory guidance, we are submitting a Type C proposal for the Bay area which comprises the geographies of Barrow, Lancaster Cllr Ann Thomson Sam Plum and South Lakeland councils and the respective areas of the county councils of Leader of the Council Chief Executive Cumbria and Lancashire. This is a credible geography, home to nearly 320,000 Barrow Borough Council Barrow Borough Council people, most of whom live and work in the area we represent. Having taken into account the impact of our proposal on other local boundaries and geographies, we believe creating The Bay Council makes a unitary local settlement for the remainder of Cumbria more viable and supports consideration of future options in Lancashire. Partners, particularly the health service would welcome alignment with their footprint and even stronger partnership working. Initial discussions with the Police and Crime Commissioners, Chief Officers and lead member for Fire and Cllr Dr Erica Lewis Kieran Keane Rescue did not identify any insurmountable barriers, whilst recognising the need Leader of the Council Chief Executive for further consultation.
  • Colton Parish Plan 2003 Page 1 1.1

    Colton Parish Plan 2003 Page 1 1.1

    ColtonColton The results of a community consultation 2003 Parish Plan •Lakeside •Finsthwaite •Bouth •Oxen Park •Rusland •Nibthwaite ContentsContents 1. Foreword . .2 5. Summary of Survey Results . .28 - 30 by the Chairman of the Parish Council Analysis of the AHA report on the Questionnaire 2. Introduction and Policy . .3 6. Residents comments from questionnaire . .31 - 33 3. The Parish of Colton . .4 7. The Open Meetings Brief . .34 report on the three open meetings held and comments and points 4. Response from Organisations and Individuals . .5 raised at the meetings Information provided by various organisations Rusland & District W.I. .5 8. Action Plan . .35 - 37 Bouth W.I. .6 Young Farmers . .7-8 9. Vision for the Future . .38 Holy Trinity Parish Church Colton . .9 Saint Paul’s Parish Church, Rusland . .10 10. Colton Parish Councillors . .39 Tottlebank Baptist Church . .11 Rookhow Friends Meeting house in the Rusland Valley . .12 11. Appendix . .40 Finsthwaite Church . .13 Copy of the Parish Plan Questionnaire Response from Schools . .14 - 15 A Few of the Changes in Fifty Years of Farming . .16 - 17 National Park Authority owned properties in Colton Parish . .18 Response from the Lake District National Park Authority . .19 Response from Cumbria County Council . .19 South Lakeland District Council . .20 Rusland Valley Community Trust . .21 Forest Enterprise . .22 Hay Bridge Nature Reserve . .23 Lakeside & Finsthwaite Village Hall . .24 Rusland Reading Rooms . .25 Bouth Reading Rooms . .25 Oxen Park Reading Room . .25 Rusland Valley Horticultural Society . .26 - 27 Colton Parish Plan 2003 Page 1 1.1. ForewordForeword Colton Parish is one of the larger rural generally.
  • HERITAGE at RISK REGISTER 2009 / NORTH WEST Contents

    HERITAGE at RISK REGISTER 2009 / NORTH WEST Contents

    HERITAGE AT RISK REGISTER 2009 / NORTH WEST Contents HERITAGEContents AT RISK 2 Buildings atHERITAGE Risk AT RISK 6 2 MonumentsBuildings at Risk at Risk 8 6 Parks and GardensMonuments at Risk at Risk 10 8 Battlefields Parksat Risk and Gardens at Risk 12 11 ShipwrecksBattlefields at Risk and Shipwrecks at Risk13 12 ConservationConservation Areas at Risk Areas at Risk 14 14 The 2009 ConservationThe 2009 CAARs Areas Survey Survey 16 16 Reducing thePublications risks and guidance 18 20 PublicationsTHE and REGISTERguidance 2008 20 21 The register – content and 22 THE REGISTERassessment 2009 criteria 21 Contents Key to the entries 21 25 The registerHeritage – content at Riskand listings 22 26 assessment criteria Key to the entries 24 Heritage at Risk entries 26 HERITAGE AT RISK 2009 / NORTH WEST HERITAGE AT RISK IN THE NORTH WEST Registered Battlefields at Risk Listed Buildings at Risk Scheduled Monuments at Risk Registered Parks and Gardens at Risk Protected Wrecks at Risk Local Planning Authority 2 HERITAGE AT RISK 2009 / NORTH WEST We are all justly proud of England’s historic buildings, monuments, parks, gardens and designed landscapes, battlefields and shipwrecks. But too many of them are suffering from neglect, decay and pressure from development. Heritage at Risk is a national project to identify these endangered places and then help secure their future. In 2008 English Heritage published its first register of Heritage at Risk – a region-by-region list of all the Grade I and II* listed buildings (and Grade II listed buildings in London), structural scheduled monuments, registered battlefields and protected wreck sites in England known to be ‘at risk’.
  • Application for Planning Permission and Listed Building Consent for Alterations, Extension Or Demolition of a Listed Building

    Application for Planning Permission and Listed Building Consent for Alterations, Extension Or Demolition of a Listed Building

    Application for Planning Permission and listed building consent for alterations, extension or demolition of a listed building. Town and Country Planning Act 1990 Planning (Listed Buildings and Conservation Areas) Act 1990 Publication of applications on planning authority websites. Please note that the information provided on this application form and in supporting documents may be published on the Authority’s website. If you require any further clarification, please contact the Authority’s planning department. 1. Applicant Name, Address and Contact Details Title: Mr & Mrs First name: BR & R Surname: Campbell Company name Country National Extension Street address: Summer Hill, Code Number Number Telephone number: Spark Bridge Mobile number: Town/City Ulverston Fax number: County: Cumbria Country: United Kingdom Email address: Postcode: LA12 7SS Are you an agent acting on behalf of the applicant? Yes No 2. Agent Name, Address and Contact Details No Agent details were submitted for this application 3. Description of Proposed Works Please describe details of the proposed development or works including details of proposals to alter, extend or demolish the listed building(s): Alteration to existing stonewalled enclosed yard to create a hobby workshop and covered storage space for a wood store. Has the development or work(s) already started? Yes No 4. Site Address Details Full postal address of the site (including full postcode where available) Description: House: Suffix: House name: Summer Hill Street address: Spark Bridge Town/City: Ulverston County: Postcode: LA12 7SS Description of location or a grid reference (must be completed if postcode is not known): Easting: 330205 Northing: 483988 Ref: 08: 6060 Planning Portal Reference: 5.
  • Local Government Boundary Commission for England Report No

    Local Government Boundary Commission for England Report No

    Local Government Boundary Commission For England Report No. 27 2 LOCAL GOVERNMENT BOUNDARY COMMISSION FOR ENGLAND REPORT NO. LOCAL GOVERNMENT BOUNDARY COMMISSION FOR ENGLAND CHAIRMAN Sir Edmund Compton GCB KBE DEPUTY CHAIRMAN Mr J M Rankin QC MEMBERS Lady Bowden Mr J T Brockbank Professor Michael Chisholm Mr R R Thornton CB DL Sir Andrew Vheatley CBE To the Ht Hon Merlyn Rees, MF Secretary of State for the Home Department PROPOSALS FOK FUTURE ULECTOHAL ARRANGEMENTS FOK THE SOUTH LAKELAND DISTRICT IN THE COUNTY Ot1 CUMBRIA 1. We, the Local Government Boundary Commission for England, having carried out our initial review of the electoral arrangements for South Lakeland district in accordance with the requirements of Section 63 of, and Schedule 9'to, the Local Government Act 1972, present our proposals for the future electoral arrangements for that district. 2. In accordance with the procedure laid down in Section 60(1) and (2) of the T972 Act, notice was given on 19 August 1974 that we were to undertake this review. This was incorporated in a consultation letter addressed to the South Lakeland District Council, copies of which were circulated to Cumbria County Council, parish councils and parish meetings in the district, the Members of Parliament for the constituencies concerned and the headquarters of the main political parties. Copies were also sent to the editors of local newspapers circulating in the area and of the local government press. Notices inserted in the local press announced the start of the review and invited comments from members of the public and from interested bodies.
  • Egton with Newland, Mansriggs and Osmotherley 341 Parish Council

    Egton with Newland, Mansriggs and Osmotherley 341 Parish Council

    EGTON WITH NEWLAND, MANSRIGGS AND OSMOTHERLEY 341 PARISH COUNCIL Minutes of the Parish C ouncil Meeting held on Tuesday 7 th January 2014 at 7pm in Greenodd Village Hall, Greenodd. MINUTES PRESENT Mr R Malcolm, Mrs A Burrow, Mrs S Hobson , Mr B Campbell, Mrs J Carson, Mrs B Edmondson, and Mrs J Ireland The Clerk PCSO Harris County Councillor & District Councillor J Willis Members of the public 693 APOLOGIES Apologies received from Mr H Graves, Mrs K Hadwin and District Councillor Airey . 694 MINUTES Item 684 to include a decision was made to draw up a map of street lights throughout the parish. 695 DECLARATIONS OF INTEREST There were no declarations of interest. 696 PUBLIC PARTICIPATION AND REPORTS FROM COUNCILLORS ETC. PCSO Harris reported that it had been reasonably quiet but there had been a report of a man in Penny Bridge harassing elderly members of the village for money and the he had been spoken to by the Police. Also to be aware that there have been burglaries throughout the area mainly from outbuildings. There was a discussion with PCSO Harris regarding the law on obstruction – this arose from the way in which cars a parked on Mount Pleasant during school drop off and pick up times. PCSO Harris made it clear that the law says if someone cannot drive out of the drive onto the public highway due to a vehicle being parked across the drive then this is obstruction. However if the vehicle is parked slightly across just making it difficult to pull off the drive then this would not be classed as obstructing.
  • A: COUNCIL TAX BASE 1. It Be Noted

    A: COUNCIL TAX BASE 1. It Be Noted

    Appendix 1 Full Council is recommended to resolve as follows: A: COUNCIL TAX BASE 1. It be noted that on the 20th December 2019, under powers delegated under Paragraph 3.1 of Part 3 of the Council’s Constitution , the Finance Lead Specialist (Section 151 Officer) calculated the Council Tax Base for the financial year 2020/21 by means of an Administrative Decision: (a) For the whole of the District as 45,712.13 (Item T in the formula in Section 31(B) of the Local Government Finance Act 1992 (”the Act”), as amended); and (b) For each part of the Council’s area: ALDINGHAM 543.71 LAMBRIGG 44.99 ANGERTON 8.25 LEVENS 576.10 ARNSIDE 1,164.41 LINDALE AND NEWTON IN CARTMEL 430.16 BARBON 134.47 LONGSLEDDALE 42.34 BEETHAM 891.00 LOWER ALLITHWAITE 900.61 BLAWITH & SUBBERTHWAITE 139.09 LOWER HOLKER 717.33 BROUGHTON EAST 151.79 LOWICK 129.34 BROUGHTON WEST 443.41 LUPTON 87.53 BURTON IN KENDAL 627.66 MANSERGH 77.71 CARTMEL FELL 251.39 MANSRIGGS 20.99 CASTERTON 180.74 MIDDLETON 51.75 CLAIFE 241.40 MILNTHORPE 734.64 COLTON 497.17 NATLAND 515.70 CONISTON 472.29 NETHER STAVELEY 316.26 CROOK 220.85 NEW HUTTON 177.81 CROSTHWAITE & LYTH 390.82 OLD HUTTON & HOLMESCALES 180.88 DENT 350.94 OSMOTHERLEY 120.11 DOCKER 26.81 OVER STAVELEY 216.72 DUNNERDALE 79.70 PENNINGTON 769.15 EGTON WITH NEWLAND 386.12 PRESTON PATRICK 177.27 FAWCETT FOREST 15.74 PRESTON RICHARD 498.35 FIRBANK 63.30 SATTERTHWAITE 129.25 GARSDALE 124.52 SCALTHWAITERIGG 43.25 GRANGE 2,138.24 SEDBERGH 1,064.14 GRAYRIGG 104.10 SEDGWICK 191.31 HAVERTHWAITE 377.75 SKELSMERGH 168.97 HAWKSHEAD 339.21 SKELWITH 116.97 HELSINGTON 172.57 STAINTON 152.30 HEVERSHAM 352.58 STAVELEY IN CARTMEL 276.54 HINCASTER 105.40 STRICKLAND KETEL 509.48 HOLME 583.68 STRICKLAND ROGER 149.36 HUGILL 245.58 TORVER 80.39 HUTTON ROOF 107.46 ULVERSTON 4,122.42 KENDAL 10,500.63 UNDERBARROW 212.45 KENTMERE 61.51 URSWICK 621.89 KILLINGTON 81.29 WHINFELL 79.42 KIRKBY IRELETH 516.81 WHITWELL & SELSIDE 100.41 KIRKBY LONSDALE 919.94 WINDERMERE 4,107.49 LAKES 2,474.91 WITHERSLACK 313.11 Total 45,712.13 Appendix 1 B: COUNCIL TAX REQUIREMENT 2.
  • Framlington Longhorsley Lowick Matfen Middleton Milfield Netherton Netherwitton N° L 82 / 70 Journal Officiel Des Communautés Européennes 26

    Framlington Longhorsley Lowick Matfen Middleton Milfield Netherton Netherwitton N° L 82 / 70 Journal Officiel Des Communautés Européennes 26

    26 . 3 . 84 Journal officiel des Communautés européennes N° L 82 / 67 DIRECTIVE DU CONSEIL du 28 février 1984 relative à la liste communautaire des zones agricoles défavorisées au sens de la directive 75 / 268 / CEE ( Royaume-Uni ) ( 84 / 169 / CEE ) LE CONSEIL DES COMMUNAUTES EUROPEENNES , considérant que les indices suivants , relatifs à la pré­ sence de terres peu productives visée à l'article 3 para­ graphe 4 point a ) de la directive 75 / 268 / CEE , ont été retenus pour la détermination de chacune des zones en vu le traité instituant la Communauté économique question : part de la superficie herbagère par rapport à européenne, la superficie agricole utile supérieure à 70 % , densité animale inférieure à l'unité de gros bétail ( UGB ) à l'hectare fourrager et montants des fermages ne dépas­ sant pas 65 % de la moyenne nationale ; vu la directive 75 / 268 / CEE du Conseil , du 28 avril 1975 , sur l'agriculture de montagne et de certaines zones défavorisées ( 2 ), modifiée en dernier lieu par la directive 82 / 786 / CEE ( 2 ), et notamment son article 2 considérant que les résultats économiques des exploi­ tations sensiblement inférieurs à la moyenne , visés paragraphe 2 , à l'article 3 paragraphe 4 point b ) de la directive 75 / 268 / CEE , ont été démontrés par le fait que le revenu du travail ne dépasse pas 80 % de la moyenne vu la proposition de la Commission , nationale ; considérant que , pour établir la faible densité de la vu l'avis de l'Assemblée ( 3 ), population visée à l'article 3 paragraphe 4 point c ) de la directive 75
  • RSAP 6 Appendix 1 to RSAP 5

    RSAP 6 Appendix 1 to RSAP 5

    DOCUMENT REFERENCE RSAP 6 Copies of letters to consultees and to libraries and addressees lists This is Appendix 1 to Document RSAP 5 the Pre-submission Consultations Statement 2 APPENDIX 1 TO DOCUMENT RSAP 5 These are the October 2011 consultation letters and lists of addressees together with letters to district councils and libraries concerning public display copies of the Site Allocations Policies and Proposals Map. 3 LETTER 1 Environment Directorate Planning and Sustainability County Offices Kendal LA9 4RQ Tel: 01539 713425 Fax: 01539 713439 Email: [email protected] Date: 24 October 2011 Ref: RGE/P334-26 Dear Sir/Madam Cumbria Minerals and Waste Development Framework Site Allocations Policies and Proposals Map Repeated Regulation 27 Consultations In 2009 and 2010 we consulted you about the above policies and maps. They were subsequently submitted to the Secretary of State, examined by the Planning Inspectorate and formally adopted by the County Council in January 2011. At a very late stage in the process, there was a successful legal challenge in connection with a procedural matter and the documents were quashed by the High Court. It is, therefore, necessary for the consultations to be repeated before the documents can be resubmitted to the Secretary of State. The challenge was about the inclusion, without a further round of consultations, of an Area of Search for sand and gravel known as M12 Roosecote quarry extension in Site Allocations Policy 7. This Area of Search was intended as a possible replacement for the nearby Roose sand and gravel quarry near Barrow in Furness, which is a Preferred Area in the policy.