DOCSLIB.ORG

The Publication "Serbian Media Scene VS European

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
The Publication List of endorsing organizations The report was written and endorsed by: Jovanka Matic, PhD Research Associate, Institute of Social Sciences, Belgrade [email protected] Association of Independent Electronic Media (ANEM) www.anem.org.rs Independent Journalists' Association of Serbia (NUNS) www.nuns.rs Association of Local Independent Media (Local Press) www.localpress.org.rs Independent Journalists' Association of Vojvodina (NDNV) www.ndnv.org Civil Rights Defenders www.civilrightsdefenders.org This Publication was prepared in cooperation with the Civil Rights Defenders and with financial support from the Swedish International Development Cooperation Agency (Sida) TABLE OF CONTENTS: Introduction ........................................................................................................................................... 4 Known and Unknown Facts about Media Sector ............................................................................. 9 1. Protection of the Right to Freedom of Expression and Information ......................................... 11 2. Freedom to Criticise State Officials ................................................................................................ 17 3. Necessity and Proportionality of Restrictions to Freedom of Expression ................................. 19 4. Freedom to Practise Journalism ....................................................................................................... 21 5. Openness of Media to Political Parties ............................................................................................ 23 6. Non-Discrimination of Foreign Journalists ..................................................................................... 26 7. Freedom to Choose Language of Communication ....................................................................... 27 8. Protection of Confidentiality of Information Sources .................................................................. 30 9. Limitation of Exclusive Reporting Rights ........................................................................................ 32 10. Proportionality of Privacy Protection and State Secret ............................................................... 33 11. Protection of Journalist Labour and Social Rights ......................................................................... 35 12. Journalist Freedom of Trade Union Organising............................................................................. 38 13. Protection of Editorial Policy Independence .................................................................................. 40 14. Protection of Journalist Safety .......................................................................................................... 44 15. Impartiality and Efficiency of Regulatory Authorities ................................................................... 47 16. Equal Access to Distribution Channels ............................................................................................ 51 17. Freedom of Access to the Internet and Foreign Media ................................................................ 54 18. Prevention of Monopolies and Development of Pluralism ........................................................... 55 19. Neutrality of State Subsidies ............................................................................................................. 59 20. Independence of Public Service Broadcasters................................................................................ 62 21. Protection of Public Service Broadcasters’ Editorial Autonomy ................................................ 66 22. Undesirability of Hidden State Ownership in Media ..................................................................... 68 23. Incompatibility between Public Office-Holding and Pursuit of Professional Media Activities 71 24. Openness of Authorities to All Media.............................................................................................. 72 25. Preference for Media Self-Regulation .............................................................................................. 75 26. Compliance with Journalist Code of Conduct ................................................................................ 78 27. Parliament’s Care for Media Freedom Development .................................................................. 80 Sources and notes ............................................................................................................................... 82 SERBIAN MEDIA SCENE VS EUROPEAN STANDARDS Page 3 Introduction One of the key events in the history of democratic development was the cognizance of the importance of free press. Many technological revolutions, which ensued in the following two centuries, were a breeding ground for the new media, and while the most recent digital revolution is unfolding right now, before our very eyes, the freedom of media in its increasingly diverse forms of public communication has preserved the status of an indispensable ingredient of a functional democracy and a crucial issue for the organisation and regulation of any media system. Among experts there is still a dispute over the way in which the freedom of media should be measured, although comparative assessments at the global level have been made for almost four decades (since 1973). The concept of media freedom is widely accepted, but it is defined and interpreted differently in different parts of the world. Even when measuring scales and indicators are the same, they have different specific weight in different political systems and cultural traditions. No one disputes, however, that the assessment of media freedoms, as a sort of public exercise in scrutiny of the issue of importance for the whole society, is necessary and useful. There are several initiatives for formulating a standardised instrument for the measurement of the degree of development of media freedoms. Before compiling its own list of indicators for the assessment of the degree of media development, UNESCO has enumerated 26 such lists. Their own lists of indicators were developed, for example, by Freedom House, Reporters without Borders, IREX (Media Sustainability Index, MSI), World Bank, Committee to Protect Journalists, European Federation of Journalists, Media Institute of Southern Africa, etc. What they all have in common is the understanding of freedom of expression as a foundation for all other democratic freedoms and the conviction that assessments of the circumstances in which media operate are helping pinpoint problematic issues and potential flaws of the media system as well as to define new operational or systemic solutions which will advance free operation of the media. One such list for the assessment of freedom of expression, freedom of information and freedom of media, under the name of “Indicators for Media in a Democracy”, was developed under the auspices of the Council of Europe. In 2008, the Parliamentary Assembly of the Council of Europe adopted this list (Resolution 1636/2008), and along with it a recommendation (Recommendation 1848/2008), suggesting to member countries – above all the national parliaments – to draw up periodic reports and analyses of the media freedom in their countries on the basis of this list. At the same time, it was recommended to the Committee of Ministers of the Council of Europe to take into account the list of indicators when assessing media situation in member countries. The list of the Council of Europe “Indicators for Media in a Democracy” features, in fact, 27 principles pertaining to media freedoms, which the Council of Europe has already identified as desirable standards of media practice in earlier resolutions and recommendations of the Parliamentary Assembly or the Committee of Ministers. The Council of Europe itself refers to them as “basic principles”. They are set apart as basic values which, for the purpose of consolidating democratic stability of Europe, should be protected together and individually by each and every one of the 47 Council of Europe member countries – the United Kingdom as much as Russia, Sweden as much as Moldova. Hence, the proposed catalogue of values and principles may be considered the least common denominator of the Council of Europe member countries‟ commitment to protect human rights, democracy and the rule of law in the field of public communication, irrespective of differences in tradition, economy, political culture and development of the media system. Criteria of the “developed West” (“Western bias”), hardly applicable in different cultural environments, which is something that is often reproached to other measuring instruments for the assessment of media freedom, have not been incorporated in the list of indicators. Variations in comprehension of the social responsibility of the media, which are always historically and culturally conditioned, are overcome by focusing on the role of media in the creation of conditions for the participation of public in the democratic SERBIAN MEDIA SCENE VS EUROPEAN STANDARDS Page 4 decision-making process – the public should be well-informed and it should be entitled to free debate on diverging opinions. There are neither many references to new multimedia forms of communication – no mention of digital dividend, dangers of ownership concentration between telecommunications operators and traditional media, advantages of regulators‟ convergence or citizen journalism. The concepts
Load more

Recommended publications
  • SERBIA Jovanka Matić and Dubravka Valić Nedeljković
    SERBIA Jovanka Matić and Dubravka Valić Nedeljković porocilo.indb 327 20.5.2014 9:04:47 INTRODUCTION Serbia’s transition to democratic governance started in 2000. Reconstruction of the media system – aimed at developing free, independent and pluralistic media – was an important part of reform processes. After 13 years of democratisation eff orts, no one can argue that a new media system has not been put in place. Th e system is pluralistic; the media are predominantly in private ownership; the legal framework includes European democratic standards; broadcasting is regulated by bodies separated from executive state power; public service broadcasters have evolved from the former state-run radio and tel- evision company which acted as a pillar of the fallen autocratic regime. However, there is no public consensus that the changes have produced more positive than negative results. Th e media sector is liberalized but this has not brought a better-in- formed public. Media freedom has been expanded but it has endangered the concept of socially responsible journalism. Among about 1200 media outlets many have neither po- litical nor economic independence. Th e only industrial segments on the rise are the enter- tainment press and cable channels featuring reality shows and entertainment. Th e level of professionalism and reputation of journalists have been drastically reduced. Th e current media system suff ers from many weaknesses. Media legislation is incom- plete, inconsistent and outdated. Privatisation of state-owned media, stipulated as mandato- ry 10 years ago, is uncompleted. Th e media market is very poorly regulated resulting in dras- tically unequal conditions for state-owned and private media.
    [Show full text]
  • Javna Komunikacija U Srbiji
    U realizaciji istraživanja i izveštaja učestvovali: dr Jovanka Matić, naučni saradnik Instituta društvenih nauka u Beogradu [email protected] Asocijacija nezavisnih elektronskih medija (ANEM) www.anem.org.rs Nezavisno udruženje novinara Srbije (NUNS) www.nuns.rs Asocijacija lokalnih nezavisnih medija (Lokal pres) www.localpress.org.rs Nezavisno društvo novinara Vojvodine (NDNV) www.ndnv.org Civil Rights Defenders www.civilrightsdefenders.org Ova Publikacija je realizovana u saradnji sa Civil Rights Defenders i uz finansijsku podršku Švedske agencije za međunarodni razvoj (Sida) Medijske slobode Srbije u evropskom ogledalu Page 2 SADRŽAJ: Uvod ................................................................................................................................... 4 Poznate i nepoznate činjenice o medijskom sektoru ................................................... 9 1. Zaštita prava na slobodu izražavanja i informisanja ................................................... 11 2. Sloboda kritike državnih funkcionera ........................................................................... 16 3. Nužnost i proporcionalnost ograničavanja slobode izražavanja ................................ 18 4. Sloboda ulaska u novinarsku profesiju .......................................................................... 20 5. Otvorenost medija za političke partije ......................................................................... 22 6. Nediskriminacija stranih novinara ...............................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Serbia Guidebook 2013
    SERBIA PREFACE A visit to Serbia places one in the center of the Balkans, the 20th century's tinderbox of Europe, where two wars were fought as prelude to World War I and where the last decade of the century witnessed Europe's bloodiest conflict since World War II. Serbia chose democracy in the waning days before the 21st century formally dawned and is steadily transforming an open, democratic, free-market society. Serbia offers a countryside that is beautiful and diverse. The country's infrastructure, though over-burdened, is European. The general reaction of the local population is genuinely one of welcome. The local population is warm and focused on the future; assuming their rightful place in Europe. AREA, GEOGRAPHY, AND CLIMATE Serbia is located in the central part of the Balkan Peninsula and occupies 77,474square kilometers, an area slightly smaller than South Carolina. It borders Montenegro, Croatia and Bosnia-Herzegovina to the west, Hungary to the north, Romania and Bulgaria to the east, and Albania, Macedonia, and Kosovo to the south. Serbia's many waterway, road, rail, and telecommunications networks link Europe with Asia at a strategic intersection in southeastern Europe. Endowed with natural beauty, Serbia is rich in varied topography and climate. Three navigable rivers pass through Serbia: the Danube, Sava, and Tisa. The longest is the Danube, which flows for 588 of its 2,857-kilometer course through Serbia and meanders around the capital, Belgrade, on its way to Romania and the Black Sea. The fertile flatlands of the Panonian Plain distinguish Serbia's northern countryside, while the east flaunts dramatic limestone ranges and basins.
    [Show full text]
  • Kultura Kao Deo Programskog Sadržaja Televizije Beograd – Javnog Medijskog Servisa Srbije
    T. VULIĆ, M. VUJOVIĆ i A. M. PROKOPOVIĆ Univerzitet u Nišu, Filozofski fakultet, Niš DOI 10.5937/kultura1237328V UDK 654.197:008(497.11) istraživački rad KULTURA KAO DEO PROGRAMSKOG SADRŽAJA TELEVIZIJE BEOGRAD – JAVNOG MEDIJSKOG SERVISA SRBIJE Sa­že­tak:­Od­2006.­go­di­ne­ka­da­je­Ra­dio–te­le­vi­zi­ja­Sr­bi­je­po­če­la­pro­ ces­tran­sfor­ma­ci­je­u­jav­ni­me­dij­ski­ser­vis,­pred­Te­le­vi­zi­ju­Be­o­grad­po­ sta­vlje­ni­su­pro­gram­ski­zah­te­vi­ka­rak­te­ri­stič­ni­za­vi­so­ke­stan­dar­de­jav­ nog­ser­vi­sa.­U­ovom­ra­du­ana­li­zi­ra­se­pro­gram­o­kul­tu­ri,­kao­je­dan­od­ po­ka­za­te­lja­uspe­šno­sti­tran­sfor­ma­ci­je­Te­le­vi­zi­je­Be­o­grad­u­jav­ni­ser­vis,­ s­ ob­zi­rom­da­ je­ reč­o­pro­gra­mu­ ko­ji­je­ zna­ča­jan­ za­ši­re­nje­zna­nja­ i­ ostva­ri­va­nje­obra­zov­ne­funk­ci­je­me­di­ja,­kao­i­za­oču­va­nje­kul­tur­ne­ba­ šti­ne­i­kul­tur­nog­iden­ti­te­ta­na­ro­da.­Vi­še­od­po­la­ve­ka­kul­tur­ni­pro­gram­ je­za­u­zi­mao­zna­čaj­no­me­sto­u­pro­gra­mu­Ra­dio­te­le­vi­zi­je­Sr­bi­je,­ko­ja­je­ po­sta­vi­la­ka­ko­autor­ske­ta­ko­i­pro­duk­cij­ske­stan­dar­de­vred­ne­pa­žnje.­ Cilj­ ovog­ ra­da­ je­ da­ se­ usta­no­vi­ me­sto­ i­ ulo­ga­ sa­dr­ža­ja­ po­sve­će­nih­ kul­tu­ri­na­Te­le­vi­zi­ji­Be­o­grad.­Po­la­zna­hi­po­te­za­je­da­te­ma­ma­iz­kul­tu­re­ da­nas­ni­je­po­sve­će­no­do­volj­no­pro­sto­ra­na­Te­le­vi­zi­ji­Be­o­grad.­Kon­cep­ ci­ja­for­ma­ta­po­zna­tog­kao­„Kul­tur­no­obra­zov­ni­pro­gram“,­či­ni­se,­ni­je­ naj­bo­lje­re­še­nje­jer­se­i­u­„kon­glo­me­ra­tu“­ra­zno­vr­snih­pro­gram­skih­ sa­dr­ža­ja­me­sto­za­kul­tu­ru­na­la­zi­na­mar­gi­na­ma.­ Ključ­ne­re­či:­Ra­dio–te­le­vi­zi­ja­Sr­bi­je,­jav­ni­ser­vis,­pro­gram­o­kul­tu­ri,­ Kul­tur­no­obra­zov­ni­pro­gram,­pro­gram­ski­stan­dar­di 328 T.
    [Show full text]
  • 22.01.2020.G. Katalog Radijskih I Televizijskih Programa
    ANEKS 1-12 Odobrenje br. O-AVMD-Ol Datum: 22.01.2020.g. Katalog radijskih i televizijskih programa - Telemach 1. RTCG 1 66. Zadruga 1 131. Eroxxx 2. RTCG2 67. Zadruga 2 132. France 24 (French/English) 3. RTCG SAT 68. Zadruga 3 133. Pink 4. TV Nikšić 69. Zadruga 4 134. Pink 2 5. TV Budva 70. CineStar TV Action&Thriller 135. Pink 3 Info 6. TV Pljevlja 71. CineStar TV Premiere 1 136. Pink Thriller 7. TV Herceg Novi 72. CineStar TV Premiere 2 137. Pink Crime&Mystery 8. TV Vijesti 73. SCI FI 138. Pink Romance 9. TV Prva 74. AXN 139. Pink Sci-Fi&Fantasy 10. TV Nova M 75. AXN Spin 140. Pink Reality 11. Srpska TV 76. ShortsTV 141. Prva Premium 12. A1 TV Montenegro 77. Outdoor 142. Pink Soap 13. TV 7 78. HBO 143. Pink World 14. TV Sun 79. HBO 2 144. Pink Zabava 15. Novi TV 80. HB0 3 145. Pink Music 16. TV Corona 81. Cinemax 146. Pink Music 2 17. Radio Crne Gore 82. Cinemax 2 147. Pink Hits 1 18. Radio Delfin 83. Extreme Sports 148. Pink Hits 2 19. Studio B 84. Motorvision TV 149. Pink Koncert 20. TV Avala 85. Minimax 150. Pink Folk 21. Hayat plus 86. Jim Jam 151. Pink Folk 2 22. Pink M 87. Boomerang 152. Pink&Roll 23. Prva 88. CBS Reality 153. Pink Fashion 24. 02 89. Discovery 154. Pink Plus 25. Prva Plus 90. Discovery Science 155. Pink Extra 26. Al Jazeera Balkans 91. DTX 156. Pink Action 27.
    [Show full text]
  • Media News Bulletin Home
    Issue No. 34 July 20 - August 3, 2012 Content Otasevic: RT Vojvodina has improved its programme – Vucic, Dinkic and Braca Petkovic to be in charge of media policy – Media professionals express skepticism – What is the interest of the buyer of Politika? - The new president of the Parliament does not know whether a new Law on Information will be prepared – UNS: The media has an important role in negotiations with the EU – The media in Southeast Europe are under increasing influence of politics, says SEEMO – Council of Europe expresses similar opinion – Editors of Politika: Political control over Politika continues – Vucic announces revoking of the Law on Information – Obradovic is opposed to formation of regional public service broadcasters – RTS programme is criticized – Will V. Eric replace A. Tijanic? - Percentage of paid TV fee is low – Neighborhood of Kursumlija is not covered by the RTS signal, but the bills are coming – Citizens of Subotica are opposed to the TV fee – V. Ilic attacks journalist – Ilic apologizes – Crew of RTV Velika Kikinda is attacked – Journalist gets fired for criticizing the director – International Initiative for Monitoring of Anti-Serbianism to sue Beta and Blic – Attacker on property ot TV Apatin is prosecuted – Journalist ends up in jail: the case of Laslo Sas – Protests from Serbia and abroad follow – Sas asks for pardon – Rights of minorities are better on paper than in practice, says the EU Monitoring Mission – National Council of Hungarians wants to take over Radio Subotica – Director of RTV Panon is
    [Show full text]
  • Download National Strategy Against Drug Abuse Info Sheet
    STRATEGY FOR INFLUENCE SPREADING AND INITIATING NEW SOCIAL RELATIONS IMPLEMENTATION OF NATIONAL STRATEGY AGAINST DRUG ABUSE Category: Influential marketing Country: Serbia Client: Ministry of Health Affairs of the Republic of Serbia, European Commission Office to Belgrade (INSADA project) Agency: SVA, agency for market communications, www.sva.rs WHY Adolescence is the time of exploring the freedom, time of challenges and adjusting, time of self-assertion and “proving”. Drugs represent an easily accessible challenge. They are widely spread in all of the society’s layers. At first drugs come as an experiment, and then they become a “simple” shortcut for solving personal problems with family and school. On one side, we have drug dealers as the offering party, and on the other we have children that are still developing as the demanding party. Between them we find social institutions: family, sport organizations, social systems of health care, education, law enforcement and others. HOW By parental threating, beating or yelling? School system by running away from its obligations of education, understanding, care and discussion? By shifting the responsibility from the police to the system of justice, the responsibility of the system of justice to the schools, and that of the schools to the parents? By shifting the responsibility from the doctors to the teachers, the responsibility of the authorities to the family and vice versa? Or by accepting our own role in order to understand, to know how and to act? In order to activate ourselves as well as the others. In order to persist and look for even more efficient ways.
    [Show full text]
  • Final Program Report Promedia II/Serbia Program
    Final Program Report ProMedia II/Serbia Program (Cooperative Agreement No. CA#169-0022-A-00-9101-00) September 27, 1999 – June 30, 2007 (with addendum to cover extension period July 1, 2007 – September 30, 2008) Submitted October 8, 2007 Please direct any questions about this report to: Mark Whitehouse Director, Media Development Division IREX 2121 K Street, NW Suite 700 Washington, DC 20037 (202) 628-8188 [email protected] Final Program Report ProMedia II/Serbia Program CONTENTS I. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY II. INTRODUCTION III. PROMEDIA II/SERBIA PROGRAM RESULTS FRAMEWORK IV. PROMEDIA II/SERBIA PROGRAM ACTIVITIES V. CONCLUSIONS AND LESSONS LEARNED Page 2 of 65 Final Program Report ProMedia II/Serbia Program I. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY The USAID-funded ProMedia II/Serbia program began in October 1999 as a follow-on to the ProMedia I program. It concluded on June 30, 2007. During this eight-year period in Serbia, the political context was a roller coaster for the media sector. Under Milosevic, the independent media was severely repressed. The Public Information Law was used as “legal” justification for confiscating equipment, imposing unrealistic fines, closing down media outlets and sending journalist and editors to prison. Immediately following the end of the Milosevic regime in October 2000, it was thought that more democratic laws that provided for access to information, a right to free speech, fair allocation of frequencies and license would be enacted. However, the newly elected government was not as supportive of media freedom as was anticipated. The independent media suffered severe economic pressures, a lack of a legal framework, political pressures and social pressures between 2001 and 2007.
    [Show full text]
  • "Serbia." Nations in Transit 2013
    Serbia by Dragana Pec´o Capital: Belgrade Population: 7.3 million GNI/capita, PPP: US$11,090 Source: The data above are drawn from the World Bank’sWorld Development Indicators 2013. Nations in Transit Ratings and Averaged Scores 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 Electoral Process 3.50 3.25 3.25 3.25 3.25 3.25 3.25 3.25 3.25 3.25 Civil Society 2.75 2.75 2.75 2.75 2.75 2.75 2.50 2.25 2.25 2.25 Independent Media 3.50 3.25 3.25 3.50 3.75 3.75 4.00 4.00 4.00 4.00 Governance* 4.00 n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a National Democratic Governance n/a 4.00 4.00 3.75 4.00 4.00 3.75 3.75 3.75 3.75 Local Democratic Governance n/a 3.75 3.75 3.75 3.75 3.75 3.50 3.50 3.50 3.50 Judicial Framework and Independence 4.25 4.25 4.25 4.25 4.50 4.50 4.50 4.50 4.50 4.50 Corruption 5.00 5.00 4.75 4.50 4.50 4.50 4.50 4.25 4.25 4.25 Democracy Score 3.83 3.75 3.71 3.68 3.79 3.79 3.71 3.64 3.64 3.64 * Starting with the 2005 edition, Freedom House introduced separate analysis and ratings for national democratic governance and local democratic governance to provide readers with more detailed and nuanced analysis of these two important subjects.
    [Show full text]
  • Iv Monitoring of the Work of Regulatory Bodies, State Authorities and Collective Organizations for the Protection of Copyright and Related Rights
    LEGAL MONITORING OF THE SERBIAN MEDIA SCENE - Report for September 2013 IV MONITORING OF THE WORK OF REGULATORY BODIES, STATE AUTHORITIES AND COLLECTIVE ORGANIZATIONS FOR THE PROTECTION OF COPYRIGHT AND RELATED RIGHTS REGULATORY BODIES 1. REPUBLIC BROADCASTING AGENCY (RBA) 1.1. We have also elaborated on the activities of the RBA in the section of this Report concerning the implementation of the Broadcasting Law. 1.2. On September 13, 2013, at the same session where it rejected the complaints of “Kopernikus cable network” d.o.o. from Nis and “Nova.rs Television” d.o.o. from Belgrade against the decision not to allocate the license for broadcasting the program on the national frequency left vacant after the shutting down of TV Avala, the RBA Council decided to reject as unfounded the petition by “Ringier Axel Springer”, the publisher of the daily “Blic” (related to the content of the program of TV Pink). From the short press release posted on the RBA’s website, it is not possible to deduce to what the petition pertained. According to the Broadcasting Law, any natural or legal person may file the petition, if they believe that the programs of radio and TV stations offend or threaten their personal interests or the interest of the public. We remind that the RBA Council has initiated somewhat earlier ex officio proceedings (which were joined to the proceedings conducted under the petition filed by Dragan Djilas, the President of the Democratic Party) against TV Pink, due to that station’s repeated attacks against Veselin Simonovic, the Editor-in-Chief of “Blic”.
    [Show full text]
  • Analiza TV Tržišta
    Analiza TV tržišta Ipsos Puls Budmanijeva 1, Zagreb +385 1 6008 900 Sadržaj Uvod ............................................................................................................................... 5 1. Trendovi u TV industriji u Hrvatskoj i svijetu ....................................................... 8 1.1 TEHNOLOGIJA PROIZVODNJE TV SADRŽAJA ........................................................................... 8 1.2 TEHNOLOGIJA PROIZVODNJE VIJESTI ....................................................................................... 9 1.3 TEHNOLOGIJA PROIZVODNJE IGRANOG SADRŽAJA ................................................................ 10 1.4 TEHNOLOGIJA TV PRIJENOSA UŽIVO ..................................................................................... 10 1.5 OPĆEDOSTUPNA TEHNOLOGIJA ZA PROIZVODNJU TV SADRŽAJA ......................................... 11 1.6 TEHNOLOGIJA DISTRIBUCIJE SADRŽAJA ................................................................................ 13 1.7 RAZVOJ POJEDINIH SEGMENATA TV TRŽIŠTA ....................................................................... 14 1.7.1 Tehničke specifičnosti .................................................................................................. 15 1.8 TRENDOVI KONVERGENCIJE MEDIJA ..................................................................................... 16 1.9 OSNOVNI MEĐUNARODNI TRENDOVI GLEDANOSTI LOKALNIH I REGIONALNIH TV POSTAJA 17 1.10 ZAKLJUČAK ..........................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Media-Sustainability-Index-Europe-Eurasia-2013-Full.Pdf.Pdf
    tajikistan bosnia & herzegovina bulgaria uzbekistan albania croatia romania azerbaijan russia kyrgyzstan turkmenistan montenegro kazakhstan serbia kosovo macedonia ukraine belarus moldova georgia armenia DEVELOPMENT MEDIA OF SUSTAINABLE SUSTAINABILITY INDEPENDENT MEDIA IN INDEX EUROPE AND EURASIA 2013 MEDIA SUSTAINABILITY INDEX 2013 The Development of Sustainable Independent Media in Europe and Eurasia MEDIA SUSTAINABILITY INDEX 2013 The Development of Sustainable Independent Media in Europe and Eurasia www.irex.org/msi Copyright © 2013 by IREX IREX 1275 K Street, NW, Suite 600 Washington, DC 20005 E-mail: [email protected] Phone: (202) 628-8188 Fax: (202) 628-8189 www.irex.org Managing editor: Leon Morse Project manager: Myles G. Smith IREX project and editorial support: Robert Zabel Editorial support: Donna Brutkowski, Dayna Kerecman Myers, Rick Spencer Copyeditors: Carolyn Feola de Rugamas, Carolyn.Ink; Kelly Kramer, WORDtoWORD Editorial Services Translation support: Ultra Translate, LLC Design and layout: OmniStudio Printer: Westland Enterprises, Inc. Notice of Rights: Permission is granted to display, copy, and distribute the MSI in whole or in part, provided that: (a) the materials are used with the acknowledgement “The Media Sustainability Index (MSI) is a product of IREX with funding from USAID.”; (b) the MSI is used solely for personal, noncommercial, or informational use; and (c) no modifications of the MSI are made. Acknowledgment: This publication was made possible through support provided by the United States Agency for International Development (USAID) under Cooperative Agreement No. DGS-A-00-99-00015-00. Disclaimer: The opinions expressed herein are those of the panelists and other project researchers and do not necessarily reflect the views of USAID or IREX.
    [Show full text]