EXTENSIONS of REMARKS May 31, 1979 H.R
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
13094 EXTENSIONS OF REMARKS May 31, 1979 H.R. 2445: Mr. BETHUNE, Mr. EDGAR, Mr. H.R. 3283: Mr. MURPHY o! Pennsylvania, o! the Virgin Islands, Mr. LAFALCE, Mr. Mc BEARD o! Rhode Island, Mr. CAVANAUGH, Mr. Mr. WALGREN, Mr. MITCHELL o! Maryland, Mr. KINNEY, Mr. CHENEY, Mr. OTTINGER, Mr. FLORIO, Mr. FORSYTHE, Mr. BEDELL, Mr. PAT- GOODLING, Mr. HANLEY, Mr. BAILEY, Mr. GRISHAM, Mr. FISH, and Mr. GUDGER. TEN, Mr. MARKEY, Mr. DERWINSKI, Mr. RI- MARKEY, Mr. STOKES, Mr. WOLPE, Mr. JEN H.R. 4027: Mr. ANDREWS of North Dakota, NALDO, Mr. MOLLOHAN, Mr. COELHO, Mr. RETTE, Mr. GARCIA, Mr. EDGAR, Mr. BEDELL, Mr. Mr. BETHUNE, Mr. BEVILL, Mr. CAVANAUGH, COUGHLIN, Mr. KINDNESS, Mr. HAMMER- DASCHLE, Mr. WEISS, and Mr. HOWARD. Mr. DONNELLY, Mr. JENRETTE, Mr. LOTT, Mr. SCHMIDT, Mr. DANNEMEYER, Mr. PATTERSON, H.R. 3293: Mr. SEmERLING, Mr. BEDELL, Mr. MO'rTL, Mr. PEASE, Mr. SENSENBRENNER, Mr. and Mr. WALGREN. DoUGHERTY, Mr. LEACH o! Iowa, and Mr. SYMMS, Mr. WILLIAMS o! Ohio, and Mr. H.R. 2551: Mrs. FENWICK, Mr. BEILENSON, TAUKE. Y oUNG o! Missouri. Mr. SABO, Mr. VENTO, Mr. ROE, Mr. BONIOR o! H.R. 3294: Mr. SEmERLING, Mr. BEDELL, Mr. H.R. 4067: Mr. BREAUX. Michigan, Mr. EDGAR, Mr. DOWNEY, Mr. EVANS DOUGHERTY, Mr. LEACH o! Iowa and Mr. H.R. 422'4: Mrs. SNOWE. o! Georgia, Mr. BEDELL, Mr. EMERY, Mr. How- TAUKE. H.J. Res. 69: Mr. ADDABBO, Mr. BOWEN, Mr. ARD, Mr. CARR, Mr. PATTEN, Mr. AUCOIN, Mr. H.R. 3295: Mr. SEIBERLING, Mr. BEDELL, Mr. COTTER, Mr. MARTIN, Mr. WOLPE, and Mr. RINALDO, Mr. FLOOD, Mr. LEE, Mr. WILLIAMS DOUGHERTY, Mr. LEACH of Iowa, and Mr. YATRON. o! Montana, and Mr. WOLPE. · TAUKE. H.R. 2647: Mr. GmBONS, Mr. COLEMAN, Mr. H.R. 3403: Mr. HAMMERSCHMIDT. H.J. Res. 272: Mr. WINN, Mr. HOWARD, Mr. THOMPSON, Mr. HOLLENBECK, and Mr. H.R. 3613: Mr. COELHO, Mr. GUDGER, Mr. STENHOLM, and Mr. JONES o! North Carolina. RINALDO. SEmERLING, Mr. GINGRICH, and Mr. CORCORAN. H. Con. Res. 87: Mr. MOAKLEY. H.R. 2648: Mr. GIBBONS, Mr. COLEMAN, Mr. H.R. 3687: Mr. BREAUX. H. Con. Res. 121: Mr. DRINAN, Mr. WOLPE, THOMPSON, and Mr. HOLLE!'iBECK. H.R. 3719: Mr. GILMAN and Mr. CLEVELAND. Mr. GLICKMAN, Mr. WEISS, Mr. DOWNEY, Mr. H.R. 2777: Mr. LAFALCE, Mr. DERWINSKI, Mr. H.R. 3769: Mr. HOLLENBECK. FLOOD, Mr. MICA, Mr. COELHO, Mr. BLANCHARD, McDONALD, Mr. COLLINS Of Texas, Mr. WHITE- H.R. 3912: Mr. NEAL, Mr. PATTEN, Mr. and Mr. DOUGHERTY. HURST, Mr. SIMON, Mr. LOTT, Mr. DORNAN, Mr. LUJAN, Mr. MINETA, Mr. LAGOMARSINO, Mr. H. Res.186: Mr. SEIBERLING, Mr. BEDELL, Mr. CARTER, Mr. MAGUIRE, Mr. MITCHELL o! Mary- ERLENBORN, Mr. HORTON, Mr. ADDABBO, Mr. DOUGHERTY, Mr. LEACH o! Iowa, and Mr. land, and Mr. CLEVELAND. GOLDWATER, Mrs. BYRON, Mr. ERTEL, Mr. EVANS TAUKE. EXTENSIONS OF REMARKS TRANSPORTATION CONSIDERA- cosponsored by one-third of all House Lands, many people gave their ideas on TIONS ADDRESSED BY STRONG Members including myself), the Udall Alaska's future transportation needs. ALASKA BILL Anderson substitute is a carefully refined As an outgrowth of years of study by and balanced bill. As a member of the the agencies, and hearings by the sub HON. ROBE.RT W. EDGAR Subcommittee on Surface Transporta committee, the boundaries of the con tion, I have been particularly interested servation areas in H.R. 39, and subse OF PENNSYLVANIA in the transportation aspects of the quently the Udall-Anderson substitute, IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES Alaska legislation. One of the obstacles were adjusted to avoid conflict with es Thursday, May 31, 1979 to efficient surface transportation in the sential transportation needs by leaving • Mr. EDGAR. Mr. Speaker, the Alaska lower 48 States has been the great diffi the needed corridors outside the conser National Interest Vmds Conservation culty of planning routes that do not con vation areas. Act has the potential of being the great flict with existing land uses. Anywhere The unforeseeable needs are addressed est conservation law in our Nation's his you want to build a highway, a rail line, bv title X of the Udall-Anderson sub tory. In my remarks on May 15 last year, a pipeline, or a power transmi5sion line, stitute, entitled "Transportation and I expressed my view that the Udall you run into conflict with people's Utility Systems on Conservation System Seiberling bill, H.R. 39, was an act of houses, farms, industrial areas, or parks. Units." First, this title states that all foresight, creating national parks and It always boils down to a question of existing laws allowing transportation wildlife refuges in Alaska that will pro who gets the short end of the stick. rights-of-way across areas of the Na vide their greatest benefits to future On the public lands in Alaska, the tional Park System, National Wild and generations, just as Yosemite and Yel situation is so different that it seems like Scenic Rivers System, National Wildlife lowstone are benefiting our generation another world. Most of the land is still Refuge System, and National Wilderness more than they did the people of the in public ownership, and has not been Preservation System shall apply to the 19th century. Unfortunately, a strong committed to specific uses. There are areas established by the Udall-Ander Alaska bill failed to pass the Senate last several major transportation routes, son substitute. year, and this year we again were faced such as the Alaska Highway, the Alaska Then it goes on to set up a procedure with the responsibility of passing a bill Railroad, and the corridor that embraces for roads, pipelines, and utility lines that to preserve the natural treasures of the Alaska oil pipeline and its associated are not allowed by those existing author Alaska. highway. But most of Alaska's surface ities. This title X procedure would sel transportation network remains to be dom be needed, because the Secretary of Far more than last year, legislation built. the Interior already has ample authority emerging from the Interior and Mer Transportation was a major factor in for most transportation rights-of-way in chant Marine Committees was damaged the development of H.R. 39 and the the conservation systems. The new pro by an overzealous response to the mining, Udall-Anderson substitute. Long before cedure would be used chiefly for trans timber, and oil industries. I think it 1s legislation was introduced, the trans portation routes across the designated time to respand more clearly to the con portation needs of Alaska were being wilderness areas. cern of the public, hence my support for studied by State and Federal agencies. Access to mining claims and State or the Udall-Anderson substitute to H.R. The Alaska Department of Highways in private property is expressly guaranteed, 39. 1973 proposed a system of tramportation no matter where this property is located. "Can't we save something that is still corridors crisscrossing the State. In 1974, There is some concern that title X the way it has been for tens of thousands the Interior Department's Bureau of may be too generous to those who would of years without first desecrating it with Land Management prepared a primary build transportation routes across the roads, mines, pipelines and other man corridor system plan, chiefly intended national interest lands. The Interior made scars?" a March 15, 1979, article for transportation of energy resources. Department has cautioned that this title in the Pittsburgh Press asked. I am The joint State-Federal Land Use Plan may actually promote the use of these gratified that the House's answer to that ning Commission for A!aska made its conservation lands for transportation question has been yes. We cannot afford own study of the transpartation outlook purposes by providing expedited Federal to let these wilderness and wildlife lands and held hearings across the State, but action that is not available for right-of be whittled away. The loss would not be declined to identify specific corridors. way applications on other Federal lands. just ours, but our children's. Again during the field hearings of the My conclusion is that transportation Built upon last year's H.R. 39 <and House Interior Committee's Subcommit needs have been thoroughly and satis the legislation introduced this year and tee on General Oversight and Alaska factorily taken into account in the Udall- • This "bullet" symbol identifies statements or insertions which are not spoken by the Member on the floor. May 31, 1979 EXTENSIONS OF REMARKS 13095 Anderson substitute. In this bill we are ance of payment deficits of the debt-bur our country's most eloquent spokesmen protecting a large and still unimpaired dened poor nations. for economic opportunity for blacks. share of wild America for public use. At A sense of desperation runs through the Dr. Williams, who is black himself, the same time we are providing for the Blumenthal-Cooper-Elzenstat statements. analyzes all the well-intentioned social 'I1ley propose no moves the United States programs and the perhaps not-so-well future transportation needs of Alaska.• should take to retaliate against OPEC, alone or in concert with others. intentioned labor laws, and concludes Yet, they see clearly the handwriting on that they are obstacles to black economic CURBING OPEC'S POWER the wall in terms of future OPEC pricing progress. policy. The cartel managers learned a great Black Americans need the free mar lesson from the Iranian revolution: Less ket, and I would like to bring Dr. Wil HON. RICHARD A. GEPHARDT means more. liams' excellent article from today's Wall OF MISSOURI "Everybody always said that the cartel Street Journal on this subject to my col IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES could make more money by keeping it in the ground.