DOCSLIB.ORG

Design Standards and Guidelines for Central Platte Valley-Auraria

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Design Standards and Guidelines for Central Platte Valley-Auraria 2019 Design Standards and Guidelines Central Platte Valley – Auraria Prepared by: City and County of Denver Community Planning & Development Design Standards and Guidelines Central Platte Valley – Auraria Acknowledgments Denver City Council City Attorney’s Office Albus Brooks, City Council District 9 Nathan Lucero, Senior Assistant City Attorney Rafael Espinoza, City Council District 1 Adam Hernandez, Associate Assistant City Attorney Denver Planning Board Public Works Joel Noble, Chair Eulois Cleckley, Executive Director Susan Stanton, Vice-Chair Eric Osmundsen, Manager Andrew Abrams Jim Turner, Supervisor Heidi Aggeler Marco Cabanillas, Senior Engineer Jim Bershof Erin Clark Ignacio Correa-Ortiz Parks & Recreation Don Elliott Renee Martinez-Stone Allegra “Happy” Haynes, Executive Director Frank Schultz Simon Tafoya Robert Davis, City Forester Kathleen LeVeque, Manager Mark Bernstein, Project Manager II Community Planning & Development Jim Myer, Field Superintendent Jill R. Jennings Golich, Interim Executive Director Special Thanks Steve Nalley, Neighborhood Planning Manager Chris Gleissner, Supervisor Special thanks to DenverInfill (https://denverinfill. Jason Whitlock, Principal City Planner com/blog/) for the use of photographs by Ken Jeff Brasel, Senior City Planner Schroeppel and Ryan Dravitz. #1 - Page 03 #41 - Page 47 #56 - Page 59 Project Team #2 - Page 03 #42 - Page 48 #63 - Page 63 Abe Barge, Principal City Planner #19 - Page 31 #44 - Page 50 #82 - Page 75 Lilly Djaniants, Senior City Planner #27 - Page 40 #45 - Page 51 #89 - Page 80 Kristofer Johnson, Senior City Planner #37 - Page 45 #54 - Page 58 #130 - Page 115 Josh Palmeri, Associate City Planner #40 - Page 47 #57 - Page 60 #140 - Page 119 Signature Page RULES AND REGULATIONS Rules and regulations adopted pursuant to Denver Revised Municipal Code, Section 12.18. Public hearing before the Denver Planning Board held on April 3, 2019. CENTRAL PLATTE VALLEY – AURARIA DESIGN STANDARDS AND GUIDELINES APPROVED FOR LEGALITY APPROVED AND ADOPTED DESIGN STANDARDS AND GUIDELINES iii Document Contents Introduction .........................................................................................................................01 Overview ..............................................................................................................................................................02 Policy & Regulatory Foundation ............................................................................................................................08 How to Use This Document ..................................................................................................................................09 Design Review Process ........................................................................................................................................12 Submittal Requirements ........................................................................................................................................16 Chapter 1 | Site Organization .............................................................................................19 Block Configuration & Vehicle Access ...................................................................................................................22 Street Frontage, Setback & Open Space Organization ............................................................................................28 Tower Placement & Separation .............................................................................................................................32 Service Area & Utility Location ..............................................................................................................................36 Chapter 2 | Building Mass & Scale ....................................................................................39 Building Massing ..................................................................................................................................................44 Streetwall Height ..................................................................................................................................................50 Chapter 3 | Facade Design & Site Details ..........................................................................55 Facade Articulation ...............................................................................................................................................58 Windows & Transparency .............................................................................................................................................................62 Exterior Building Materials ...........................................................................................................................................................64 Balconies ....................................................................................................................................................................................66 Street Level Facade Design & Uses .......................................................................................................................68 Building Entries ..........................................................................................................................................................................74 Setback & Open Space Design.....................................................................................................................................................76 Awnings & Canopies ...................................................................................................................................................................80 Structured Parking Facades ..................................................................................................................................82 Building Rooftops .................................................................................................................................................84 Fences, Walls, & Screens .....................................................................................................................................86 iv CENTRAL PLATTE VALLEY – AURARIA Chapter 4 | Streetscape Design .........................................................................................89 Introduction to Streetscape Design ........................................................................................................................90 Streetscape Furnishing & Lighting .........................................................................................................................92 Streetscape Paving ...............................................................................................................................................95 Amenity Zone & Street Trees .................................................................................................................................96 Bicycle Parking ..................................................................................................................................................100 Public Art ..........................................................................................................................................................102 Stormwater Management & Landscape ...............................................................................................................104 Chapter 5 | Building Signs................................................................................................107 Building Sign Location ........................................................................................................................................110 Building Sign Character & Material .....................................................................................................................112 Building Sign Lighting ........................................................................................................................................114 Individual Sign Types – Projecting Signs ..............................................................................................................116 Individual Sign Types – Non-Projecting Signs .....................................................................................................118 Glossary of Terms .............................................................................................................121 DESIGN STANDARDS AND GUIDELINES v this page intentionally left blank Introduction The Central Platte Valley – Auraria (CPV-Auraria) district represents a unique and significant opportunity for growth and change in Downtown Denver. This document aims to ensure the level of design quality and neighborhood activity generated by new development is consistent with the exceptional potential represented by this area. DESIGN STANDARDS AND GUIDELINES Introduction 01 Overview Policy & Regulatory Foundation How to Use This Document Design Review Process Overview Submittal Requirements Evolution of Downtown Denver Existing Context Over the last 50 years Denver’s Downtown skyline has Central Platte Valley - Auraria (CPV-Auraria) is located been slowly transforming. Today, Downtown Denver west of Lower Downtown, north of Auraria Campus, and has the tallest buildings within at least 500 miles of east of Jefferson Park. The Consolidated Main Line (CML) the city and continues to evolve and grow
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Downtown Denver Partnership, Inc
    STATE OF DOWNTOWN DENVER SEPTEMBER 2012 Downtown Denver Partnership, Inc. With support from: STATE OF 1 DOWNTOWN DENVER INTRODUCTION TABLE OF CONTENTS Introduction Letter .................................................1 Dear Downtown Denver Stakeholder, Key Facts ...............................................................2 Thank you for picking up a copy of the Downtown Denver Partnership’s annual State of Downtown Denver report, a fact-driven report that provides timely, Denver’s Downtown Area Plan ..............................3 objective and accurate data about Downtown Denver. This year we are proud Notable Rankings ..................................................4 to collaborate with Newmark Knight Frank Frederick Ross to bring you the most complete statistics and analysis about Downtown Denver. Office Market .................................................... 6-7 Employers & Employees ..................................... 8-9 In his 2012 State of the City address, Mayor Michael B. Hancock remarked that a vibrant downtown core is essential to the health of the city. At the 2012 Retail & Restaurants .............................................11 Rocky Mountain Urban Leadership Symposium, Governor Hickenlooper and Downtown Residents ..................................... 12-13 other leaders in the Rocky Mountain West stressed the importance of urban centers in creating strong place-based economies that attract and retain top Transportation ............................................... 14-15 talent. Downtown Denver is one
    [Show full text]
  • Trams Der Welt / Trams of the World 2020 Daten / Data © 2020 Peter Sohns Seite/Page 1 Algeria
    www.blickpunktstrab.net – Trams der Welt / Trams of the World 2020 Daten / Data © 2020 Peter Sohns Seite/Page 1 Algeria … Alger (Algier) … Metro … 1435 mm Algeria … Alger (Algier) … Tram (Electric) … 1435 mm Algeria … Constantine … Tram (Electric) … 1435 mm Algeria … Oran … Tram (Electric) … 1435 mm Algeria … Ouragla … Tram (Electric) … 1435 mm Algeria … Sétif … Tram (Electric) … 1435 mm Algeria … Sidi Bel Abbès … Tram (Electric) … 1435 mm Argentina … Buenos Aires, DF … Metro … 1435 mm Argentina … Buenos Aires, DF - Caballito … Heritage-Tram (Electric) … 1435 mm Argentina … Buenos Aires, DF - Lacroze (General Urquiza) … Interurban (Electric) … 1435 mm Argentina … Buenos Aires, DF - Premetro E … Tram (Electric) … 1435 mm Argentina … Buenos Aires, DF - Tren de la Costa … Tram (Electric) … 1435 mm Argentina … Córdoba, Córdoba … Trolleybus … Argentina … Mar del Plata, BA … Heritage-Tram (Electric) … 900 mm Argentina … Mendoza, Mendoza … Tram (Electric) … 1435 mm Argentina … Mendoza, Mendoza … Trolleybus … Argentina … Rosario, Santa Fé … Heritage-Tram (Electric) … 1435 mm Argentina … Rosario, Santa Fé … Trolleybus … Argentina … Valle Hermoso, Córdoba … Tram-Museum (Electric) … 600 mm Armenia … Yerevan … Metro … 1524 mm Armenia … Yerevan … Trolleybus … Australia … Adelaide, SA - Glenelg … Tram (Electric) … 1435 mm Australia … Ballarat, VIC … Heritage-Tram (Electric) … 1435 mm Australia … Bendigo, VIC … Heritage-Tram (Electric) … 1435 mm www.blickpunktstrab.net – Trams der Welt / Trams of the World 2020 Daten / Data © 2020 Peter Sohns Seite/Page
    [Show full text]
  • DENVER UNION STATION Master Plan September 2004
    DENVER UNION STATION Master Plan September 2004 PART I Introduction 2 Introduction Dear Fellow Citizens and Interested Readers: Denver Union Station’s unique assets make it an ideal The Master Plan is one of several major initiatives location for this new type of multimodal transportation needed to advance the redevelopment. The Denver We proudly present the Denver Union Station facility. Denver Union Station will create an exciting Planning Board has reviewed the Master Plan as the fi rst Master Plan. This document was developed through transportation crossroads, improving connections step toward City Council adoption as a supplement to an unprecedented collaboration among four public among all transportation modes, respecting the character the City and County of Denver’s Comprehensive Plan. agencies – the City and County of Denver, the and historical signifi cance of this handsome station and Concurrent with the adoption of the Master Plan, City Colorado Department of Transportation, the Denver its adjacent neighborhoods, and providing a stimulating Council will be asked to rezone the 19.5-acre Denver Regional Council of Governments, and the Regional environment for public activity and economic vitality. Union Station site as a new Transit Mixed-Use (T-MU- Transportation District – along with many organizations 30) District and designate the building and a portion of and individuals in the community and the region. Their Focusing on transportation and connectivity, the Master the site as a historic landmark in the City and County of participation, strong support, and donation of countless Plan identifi es and evaluates potential transportation, Denver. hours of their time were essential to this project.
    [Show full text]
  • 4.0 EXISTING TRANSIT PROFILE 33 These Services
    32 public. Private for profit or private nonprofit entities may operate 1 4.0 EXISTING TRANSIT PROFILE 33 these services. 2 This chapter summarizes the key features of the state’s existing 34 Intercity passenger rail service through Amtrak is publicly funded 3 (includes those under construction) public and private transit and 35 operating as a for profit corporation. 4 rail services, and presents an overview of the human service 36 Figure 4-1 shows the overall Colorado Transit Network of existing 5 agencies providing specialized transportation services in the state. 37 bus and passenger rail services. Each service type is also discussed 6 Information includes service types, service areas, passenger 38 and illustrated in the following sections. 7 eligibility, and ridership, where available. 39 4.1.1 Existing Bus Services 8 Existing Transit Systems in Colorado 40 Various bus services operate across Colorado to provide intercity, 9 The state of Colorado has over 55 urban and rural public transit and 41 regional, interregional and local services. This section provides an 10 rail providers, over 100 human service agencies that provide 42 overview of the various service types, providers, and existing 11 transportation services, and many private transit providers. These 43 services. 12 providers offer a wide range of services 13 to effectively meet the needs of the Colorado has over 55 44 Intercity Bus Service urban and rural public 14 traveling public in their area. They are 45 Intercity bus service provides regularly scheduled long-distance transit and rail 15 both public and private entities, with providers, over 100 46 travel connecting urban areas throughout the nation, is typically 16 the private entities operating as both human services 47 funded with fares, carries luggage and sometimes packages, and 17 nonprofit or for profit organizations.
    [Show full text]
  • RAIL REPORT March 2010 • NO
    RAIL REPORT March 2010 • NO. 599 Rocky Mountain Railroad Club • Rocky Mountain Railroad Historical Foundation PeruRail Presented by Joe McMillan February 9th, 2010 • 7:30 PM See a digital show on PeruRail, the railroad in Peru that serves Machu Picchu by narrow gauge and southern Peru by standard gauge. We will also cross the border into Chile for a few shots of a very unusual railroad. Please come join us for an enjoyable, educational evening at Christ Episcopal Church at 2950 South University Boulevard, University at Bates, where there is plen- ty of off street parking at the rear of the complex. Enter into Barnes Hall, where we hold the monthly meetings, on the mid-south side doors. Please bring a guest. All programs are intended to provide an educational experience on railroading. The general public is welcome to attend. There is no charge for this meeting. Please note: Due to additional scheduling changes at the Church, our meeting night will stay on the second Tuesday of the month. RMRRC Calendar April 13th Tuesday Meeting, Durango & Silverton Snow Fighting. May 11th Tuesday Meeting, Cumbres & Toltec and Durango & Silverton Narrow Gauge. May Possible tour of UP Cheyenne roundhouse and shops. June 8th Tuesday Meeting, with program to be announced soon. Due to circumstances beyond our control, programs and dates are subject to change without notice. Please contact Pat Mauro at [email protected] or phone 303-838-7740 with program ideas. Rocky Mountain Rail Report • Page 1 • March 2010 PeruRail The Machu Picchu train stops at Aguas Calientes in Peru on July 31, 2008.
    [Show full text]
  • St.Charles Streetcar FARE - 80C Transfers Additional 10A E&H FARE - WI Transfem Additional 2U
    P& Construction Costs USDepartment of Transportation and Operating Characteristics of Vintage Trolleys March 1992 1 Construction Costs and Operating Characteristics of Vintage Trolleys Final Report March 1992 Prepared by Marta Jewell KPMG Peat Marwick 8150 Leesburg Pike, Suite 800 Vienna, VA 22182 Prepared for Federal Transit Administration U.S. Department of Transportation Washington, D.C. 20590 Distributed in Cooperation with Technology Sharing Program U.S. Department of Transportation Washington, D.C. 20590 DOT-T-92-20 Introduction Study Objective and Scope In recent years, the U.S. Department of Transportation, Federal Transit Administration (PTA), has received an increasing number of requests to fund the start-up and operation of vintage trolley services. FTA implemented this study to research the institutional arrangements, service characteristics and costs associated with vintage trolley systems currently being operated in order to provide a base of information with which to make informed funding decisions for future projects. FTA also requested that comparable information be obtained for several downtown bus circulator systems which might bean alternative to the implementation of vintage trolley services. Background In 1917, there were 44,800 miles of electric railway trackage in the United States. The combination of growing automobile usage and improved roads led to the demise of electric railway transportation from the 1920s through 1950s. Today, the United States is witnessing a growing renaissance of vintage trolley systems. Vintage trolleys have been successfully integrated into the public transportation systems in several cities. Businessmen in many areas have pursued vintage trolley service as a means to stimulate local business in redeveloped or historic areas.
    [Show full text]
  • RMQ Fall2004 Real Issue
    railway museum quarterly TRAINLINE Number 10 Published cooperatively by the Tourist Railway Association Fall 2012 and the Association of Railway Museums The Nelson (B. C.) Electric Tramway Society has returned car #23, which was one-third of the town’s historic streetcar fleet, to service. It runs on a two kilometer line along the Kootenay Lake waterfront. For more see page 22. Aaron Isaacs photo. Requested Address Service Address PERMIT NO. 1096 NO. PERMIT TWIN CITIES, MN CITIES, TWIN Confers, GA 30012 GA Confers, PAID 1016 Rosser Street Rosser 1016 U.S.POSTAGE PRSRT. STD. PRSRT. ARM 2 3 ASSOCIATION OF RAILWAY MUSEUMS TOURIST RAILWAY ASSOCIATION The purpose of the Association of Railway Museums is to The Tourist Railway Association, Inc. is a non-profit lead in the advancement of railway heritage through corporation chartered to foster the development and education and advocacy, guided by the principles set forth in "Recommended Practices for Railway Museums" and operation of tourist railways and museums. incorporated in other best practices generally accepted in the wider museum community. TRAIN Membership ARM Membership Membership is open to all railway museums, tourist Membership in the Association of Railway Museums is open railroads, excursion operators, private car owners, railroad to nonprofit organizations preserving and displaying at least related publishers, industry suppliers and other interested one piece of railway or street railway rolling stock to the public persons and organizations. TRAIN, Inc. is the only trade on a regularly scheduled basis. Other organizations, businesses association created to represent the broad spectrum of and individuals interested in the work of the Association are invited to become affiliates.
    [Show full text]
  • Sacramento Streetcar System Plan
    SACRAMENTO STREETCAR SYSTEM PLAN February 2012 Acknowledgements City of Sacramento – City Council Kevin Johnson – Mayor Jay Schenirer – District 5 Angelique Ashby – Vice Mayor, District 1 Kevin McCarty – District 6 Sandy Sheedy – District 2 Darrell Fong – District 7 Steve Cohn – District 3 Bonnie Pannell – District 8 Robert King Fong – District 4 City of Sacramento – Project Coordinators Fedolia “Sparky” Harris – Department of Transportation (DOT) Denise Malvetti – Economic Development Department (EDD) Project Technical Advisory Committee City of Sacramento Sacramento Regional Transit District Hector Barron – DOT RoseMary Covington Bill Crouch – Community Development Jeff Damon Leslie Fritzsche – EDD Ryan Moore – DOT SACOG Tom Pace – Community Development Jim Brown Greg Taylor – Community Development Ed Williams – DOT Consultant Team Fehr & Peers Shiels Obletz Johnsen (SOJ) Bob Grandy (Project Manager) Ken Johnsen David Carter Rick Gustafson Robin Hutcheson Brad Tong Nicole Foletta Kyle Cook HDR Steve Rhyne Charlie Hales Carrie Carsell Jim Hecht Amy Smith Sharon Kelly AIM Consulting Bay Area Economics Gladys Cornell Matt Kowta Ciara Zanze Ron Golem Messagesmith Douglas Wright Consulting Rick Laubscher Doug Wright Sacramento Streetcar System Plan TABLE OF CONTENTS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY I. INTRODUCTION ............................................................1 Plan Goals . .1 Planning Context . .1 Purpose and Need Statement . 4 II. STREETCAR NETWORK PLANNING PROCESS ..................................6 Planning Stages . .6 III. COMMUNITY PARTICIPATION
    [Show full text]
  • The Feasibility of a Single-Track Vintage Trolley in the Midtown Greenway
    THE FEASIBILITY OF A SINGLE-TRACK VINTAGE TROLLEY IN THE MIDTOWN GREENWAY By Lomarado Group March 19, 2001 Presented to the CREDITS The Midtown Greenway Coalition thanks the following neighborhoods, individuals, foundations, and corporations for assisting with and contributing to this study. Neighborhood Organizations Funding This Study Calhoun Area Residents Action Group Cedar Isles Dean Neighborhood Association Corcoran Neighborhood Organization East Calhoun Community Organization (pending) East Isles Residents Association Longfellow Community Council Lowry Hill East Neighborhood Association Lyndale Neighborhood Association Powderhorn Park Neighborhood Association Seward Neighborhood Group Individuals Funding This Study Terry & Kevin Barnes Henry Hubben Bob Olson Elizabeth Brackett and Fred Olson Scott Likely Will Owens Darryl Carter Ranki Lyders Beth Parkhill & Bob Corrick Brad & Laurie Frederiksen Marie Markoe Zinta Pone Kathy & John Hendricks Margaret McGlynn Bob Sorenson Tom Hockenberry Midtown Greenway Coalition Transit Committee Bob Corrick Ron Fergle George Puzak John DeWitt Henry Hubben John Walley Cover Photograph Assistance with Trolley Tidbits Patrick Fox Photography Russell Olson, author of Electric Railways of Minnesota Foundations and Corporations Providing General Operating and Organizational Support for the Midtown Greenway Coalition in 2000 and 2001 Elmer & Eleanor Anderson Foundation The Minneapolis Foundation Marbrook Foundation Reliant Energy Minnegasco McKnight Foundation US Bank This report is printed on 100% recycled
    [Show full text]
  • 3. Inventory of Existing Transit Services in the DRCOG Region Within the DRCOG Planning Area, There Are Many Entities That Provide Transit Services
    3. Inventory of Existing Transit Services in the DRCOG Region Within the DRCOG planning area, there are many entities that provide transit services. These include services funded by local governments and by non-profit and for-profit organizations. Some services are open to the general public. Others are reserved for certain groups of students, employees, clients or members of a particular organization. DRCOG surveyed transit agencies that provide intraregional service within the Denver area in 2007. The results of the survey are presented in this section. Providers were categorized by their primary transit function. RTD, because of its dominance of Denver-area transit service, is examined separately. Other providers are divided into those who offer service to the general public and those who offer primarily specialized transit services. Other providers such as intercity bus services, taxis and client-based services were not surveyed, but their contribution to the overall transit network is discussed. A. Summary of Findings In 2006, about 89 million one-way trips were served by transit. Most transit trips in the region were provided by RTD. As shown in Figure 8, RTD provided approximately 87 million trips (including access-a-Ride) or 97 percent of the total transit trips. The remaining trips were provided by other general public and specialized transit providers. Figure 8 Transit Trips by Provider, 2006 Non-RTD Transit Trips (2,370,813) 3% RTD Transit Trips, (87,005,156) 97% Specialized transit trips for the elderly and disabled accounted for 1.1 percent of all transit trips in 2006 (Figure 9). Specialized transit is provided by a variety of services funded by local governments, non-profit agencies and for-profit 31 companies.
    [Show full text]
  • Statewide Transit Plan Connecting People Across Colorado
    Statewide Transit Plan connecting people across Colorado Prepared for: Prepared by: In association with: Colorado Department of Transportation Cambridge Systematics Division of Transit and Rail Nelson\Nygaard Consulting Associates OV Consulting March 2015 TransitPlus Table of Contents 1.0 INTRODUCTION ................................................................................................................................................................................................................ 7 Purpose of Plan ......................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 8 Federal and State Planning Regulations ......................................................................................................................................................................... 8 1.2.1 Federal Planning Regulations ............................................................................................................................................................................. 9 1.2.2 Colorado Planning Requirements .................................................................................................................................................................. 10 Guiding Principles for Transit Planning .....................................................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • The Singing Wire February 15, 2020
    Volume 30, No. 1 The Singing Wire February 15, 2020 The Newsletter of the Pikes Peak Historical Street Railway Foundation A LOOK AT SOME RE-PURPOSED ROUNDHOUSES Our Purpose The EP&SW Railroad Roundhouse in Tucson AZ The Pikes Peak Historical The El Paso & Southwestern Railroad (EP&SW) roundhouse in Tucson, Arizona, survives! Built in Street Railway Foundation exists to restore and operate 1912, it eventually served a succession of railroads which ultimately became the Class I EP&SW. historical street and electric The earliest railroad was the Arizona & Southeastern (A&S), which railways in the Colorado was chartered in May of 1888. It was owned and built by the Phelps Springs area. Our goal is to provide a cultural, historical, Dodge company to transport copper from the mines in southern and educational experience for Arizona to the smelter in Bisbee. the citizens of the Pikes Peak region and southern Colorado. The railroads, in order to succeed, needed a connection with either the Santa Fe or the Southern Pacific. In 1901, the A&S was taken over by EP&SW, which interestingly was also a Phelps Dodge railroad. Photos by the late Ron Dawson, Editor, EP&SW Flyer Inside this issue: The combined railroads had two major centers of operation: Tucson and El Paso, which was Phelps Dodge headquarters. The size of the Tucson roundhouse reflects the need for servicing the number of locomotives that were in operation in the area. Re-purposed Roundhouses – In 1924, the Southern Pacific Railroad (SP) purchased the EP&SW. Subsequently, the Denver & Rio Tucson AZ, Las Vegas NM, Grande bought the SP, which later merged with the Union Pacific Railroad.
    [Show full text]