DOCSLIB.ORG

Review Reviewed Work(S): from Bacteria to Bach and Back: the Evolution of Minds by Dennett, Daniel C

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Review Reviewed Work(S): from Bacteria to Bach and Back: the Evolution of Minds by Dennett, Daniel C Review Reviewed Work(s): From Bacteria to Bach and Back: The Evolution of Minds by Dennett, Daniel C. Review by: Ronald de Sousa Source: Evolutionary Studies in Imaginative Culture, Vol. 2, No. 1 (Spring 2018), pp. 113- 116 Published by: Academic Studies Press Stable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/10.26613/esic.2.1.80 Accessed: 03-07-2018 18:47 UTC JSTOR is a not-for-profit service that helps scholars, researchers, and students discover, use, and build upon a wide range of content in a trusted digital archive. We use information technology and tools to increase productivity and facilitate new forms of scholarship. For more information about JSTOR, please contact [email protected]. Your use of the JSTOR archive indicates your acceptance of the Terms & Conditions of Use, available at http://about.jstor.org/terms Academic Studies Press is collaborating with JSTOR to digitize, preserve and extend access to Evolutionary Studies in Imaginative Culture This content downloaded from 134.124.28.17 on Tue, 03 Jul 2018 18:47:22 UTC All use subject to http://about.jstor.org/terms ESIC 2018 DOI: 10.26613/esic/2.1.80 Dennett, Daniel C. 2017. From Bacteria to Bach and Back: The Evolution of Minds. New York: W. W. Norton. xviii, 496 pages. Hardback $28.95; Kindle Edition $14.14. Ronald de Sousa Over close to half a century, Daniel Dennett bottom up, from natural selection, without has been the model of a scientifically informed benefit of intelligence. philosopher exploring the mind as a product That way of talking plays a crucial role in of evolution. His latest book is a magisterial Dennett’s overarching project. It prepares the summa: he is “going for the whole story this reader for the insight that even in our most time” (16). intelligent performances, we make use of The key to Dennett’s reconstruction of our competences that we don’t understand and species’ progress to its unique form of intelli- have no need to understand. Even a Bach, in gence is the concept of competence without com- his most explicitly intelligent contrivances, prehension. Every living thing—from bacteria to will have relied not only on others’ crafts, but Bach—persists and reproduces by dint of clever also on innumerable subpersonal routines. tricks. At first, all of these tricks are performed Such routines enable each of us, for example, without comprehension. That is Darwin’s “inver- effortlessly to perform each explicit step in a sion” of the commonsense assumption that chain of conscious reasoning, such as writing competence derives from comprehension. down the result of an arithmetical operation. Only after millions of years of such mindless When we realize that our free and creative use competence has this process culminated in the of language involves competences we had no appearance of creators like Bach, whose top- part in fashioning, we should the more readily down designs are based on a rich understanding concede that the difference between fully inten- of what he wanted and how to achieve it. And tional conscious design and uncomprehending thanks to a second “inversion,” this time from competences is a matter of degree. Alan Turing, human engineers have constructed The key role of competence without com- machines whose increasingly stunning compe- prehension extends to the evolution of culture. tences, in their turn, require no comprehension. To illustrate this, Dennett makes use of Peter Dennett boldly insists that the products of Godfrey-Smith’s neat concept of “Darwinian natural selection literally embody design, just spaces,” a convenient way to represent the not the kind that required a designer. Many bearing of parameters that complement and Darwinians deplore such unqualified use of refine Darwinism’s standard triad of variation, teleological language in reference to biological heredity, and differential reproduction. In functions, fearing that it might give comfort to one such space, the 0,0,0 corner is inhabited the “intelligent design” crowd. Actually, how- by purely Darwinian processes, involving ever, it pulls the rug from under them. Indeed! zero comprehension, bottom-up design, and Dennett can calmly assert, the biosphere is rich random rather than directed search. At the oppo- with marvels of adaptation! They are due to the site corner lies the ideal conscious design, scor- demonstrable reality of competences that result, ing a maximal 1 in comprehension, top-down This content downloaded from 134.124.28.17 on Tue, 03 Jul 2018 18:47:22 UTC All use subject to http://about.jstor.org/terms Ronald de Sousa conception, and consciously directed search. In to many critics, a more significant defect is practice, all “real cultural phenomena occupy the term’s vagueness. A meme can be almost the middle ground, involving imperfect compre- anything: a phoneme, a word, a dance, a hension, imperfect search, and much middling cultural practice. The extent to which memes collaboration” (144). Figure 7.5, on which the are replicable, some protest, varies far too much sentence just quoted is a comment, doesn’t actu- to sustain the analogy with genes. ally have a dimension of collaboration. Implicitly, For Dennett, however, that is not a problem. then, the comment equates a high reliance on In digital systems of representation, every sign collaboration with “bottom-up” construction. is identified as one element or another from a Why that might seem reasonable is not explored finite set. None is ever anything in between. until the last chapter; so perhaps we can take this So fidelity in replication is indeed a crucial as an illustration of Dennett’s own concept of a feature of such systems. But digitality itself thinko—the semantic analogue of a typo (225). admits of degrees. As Dennett notes, “hear- The thinko doesn’t affect the main point about say—stenography—vinyl records—DNA— culture, which is that it will never, any more than digital file” form a continuum of increasingly individual consciousness, attain a perfect score accurate replicability (135). Degrees of fidelity on any of those dimensions: affect the durability of cultural practices, but lower degrees can also be useful. Words are at Human culture started out profoundly the very high end. They are truly digital. Most Darwinian, with uncomprehending compe- importantly, words form, once we start to use tences generating various valuable structures and reflect on them critically, the essential in roughly the way termites build their castles. “cranes” that lift us, in a cascade of metalevel Over the next few hundred thousand years, questions, ever higher into the dimension of cultural exploration of Design Space gradually comprehension. de-Darwinized … becoming a process com- Although Dennett’s championing of the posed of ever more comprehension. (282–83) concept of meme has met with a good deal of The main instrument of that process of “de- resistance, what many have found most baffling Darwinization,” lifting us from the Darwinian is his view of consciousness as “user illusion.” base towards full top-down comprehen- If consciousness is an illusion, who is being sion-based design, was the spread of memes. deceived? This is where the pull of “Cartesian “Memes” refers to cultural “ways” that “go viral” gravity” is strongest: surely I can be deceived among human minds, bringing Darwinian only if I am the conscious subject of my illusion! mechanisms into the heart of culture. That has On this, Dennett has plausibly been sus- made them seem threatening to the vaunted pected of mischievous teasing. Actually, autonomous creative capacities of intelligent however, he nowhere denies the existence of humans. The threat is real, in part: the spread of experience. His point is rather that, like the memes, like that of genes, isn’t necessarily good computer display that grounds the “user illu- for their hosts. In the service of their own prop- sion” metaphor, my experience provides almost agation, genes can be deleterious to their carri- no clue to the mechanisms that give rise to it. As ers. Similarly, a meme’s aptitude to grip onto the elaborate description of the role of compe- human minds is only weakly related to epis- tences without comprehension has shown, our temic, moral, or aesthetic standards we profess. own thinking in some ways resembles GOFAI As an objection to memes, the demotion of (Good Old-Fashioned Artificial Intelligence) human creativity they appear to entail is feeble. programs written in a high-level language. It amounts to little more than the expostulation It makes constant use of routines and subrou- that “it would be too sad if it were true.” But tines of which we know and care about only 114 Evolutionary Studies in Imaginative Culture This content downloaded from 134.124.28.17 on Tue, 03 Jul 2018 18:47:22 UTC All use subject to http://about.jstor.org/terms Daniel C. Dennet. From Bacteria to Bach and Back: The Evolution of Minds the outcome—the content of the user illusion: of the concept of zombies, you can imagine a “Our access to our own thinking, and especially being convinced that it is seeing blue yet lack- to the causation and dynamics of its subpersonal ing the quale that is either the cause or the epi- parts, is really no better than our access to our phenomenal object of that conviction. But if digestive processes” (346). If comprehension, this possibility is admitted, then how can you directed search, and top-down design admit of be sure you are not a zombie? degrees, then so does the consciousness that is “But I know that I am not a zombie!” No, you constituted by those mental activities. don’t. The only support for that conviction is Thus primed, we are less likely to believe the vehemence of the conviction itself, and as that consciousness is an all-or-nothing affair, soon as you allow the theoretical possibility with which some creatures are endowed, but that there could be zombies, you have to give others not.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Current Perspectives on Sexual Selection History, Philosophy and Theory of the Life Sciences Volume 9
    Current Perspectives on Sexual Selection History, Philosophy and Theory of the Life Sciences Volume 9 Editors: Charles T. Wolfe, Ghent University, Belgium Philippe Huneman, IHPST (CNRS/Université Paris I Panthéon-Sorbonne), France Thomas A.C. Reydon, Leibniz Universität Hannover, Germany Editorial Board: Editors Charles T. Wolfe, Ghent University, Belgium Philippe Huneman, IHPST (CNRS/Université Paris I Panthéon-Sorbonne), France Thomas A.C. Reydon, Leibniz Universität Hannover, Germany Editorial Board Marshall Abrams (University of Alabama at Birmingham) Andre Ariew (Missouri) Minus van Baalen (UPMC, Paris) Domenico Bertoloni Meli (Indiana) Richard Burian (Virginia Tech) Pietro Corsi (EHESS, Paris) François Duchesneau (Université de Montréal) John Dupré (Exeter) Paul Farber (Oregon State) Lisa Gannett (Saint Mary’s University, Halifax) Andy Gardner (Oxford) Paul Griffi ths (Sydney) Jean Gayon (IHPST, Paris) Guido Giglioni (Warburg Institute, London) Thomas Heams (INRA, AgroParisTech, Paris) James Lennox (Pittsburgh) Annick Lesne (CNRS, UPMC, Paris) Tim Lewens (Cambridge) Edouard Machery (Pittsburgh) Alexandre Métraux (Archives Poincaré, Nancy) Hans Metz (Leiden) Roberta Millstein (Davis) Staffan Müller-Wille (Exeter) Dominic Murphy (Sydney) François Munoz (Université Montpellier 2) Stuart Newman (New York Medical College) Frederik Nijhout (Duke) Samir Okasha (Bristol) Susan Oyama (CUNY) Kevin Padian (Berkeley) David Queller (Washington University, St Louis) Stéphane Schmitt (SPHERE, CNRS, Paris) Phillip Sloan (Notre Dame) Jacqueline Sullivan
    [Show full text]
  • Sexual Selection in Females
    Animal Behaviour 77 (2009) 3–11 Contents lists available at ScienceDirect Animal Behaviour journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/yanbe Reviews Sexual selection in females Tim Clutton-Brock* Department of Zoology, University of Cambridge article info Darwin developed the theory of sexual selection to account for the evolution of weaponry, ornamen- Article history: tation and other secondary sexual characters that are commonly more developed in males and which Received 28 April 2008 appeared unlikely to contribute to survival. He argued that these traits had evolved either through Initial acceptance 25 May 2008 intrasexual competition between males to monopolize access to females or through consistent female Final acceptance 27 August 2008 preferences for mating with superior partners. Since 1871, a substantial body of research has confirmed Published online 31 October 2008 his explanation of the evolution of secondary sexual characters in males, although sex differences in MS. number: 08-00267 reproductive behaviour are more diverse and the evolutionary mechanisms responsible for them are more complex than was initially recognized. However, secondary sexual characters are also widespread Keywords: in females but, as yet, their evolution and distribution have received relatively little attention from gender differences evolutionary biologists. Here, I suggest that the mechanisms responsible for the evolution of secondary intrasexual competition sexual characters in females are similar to those operating in males and include intrasexual competition mate choice sex roles between females for breeding opportunities, male mating preferences and female competition to attract sexual selection mates. Unlike males, females often compete more intensely for resources necessary for successful reproduction than for access to mating partners and the development of secondary sexual characters in females may be limited by costs to fecundity rather than to survival.
    [Show full text]
  • Finding Shared Values in a Diverse Society: Lessons from the Intelligent Design Controversy
    FINDING SHARED VALUES IN A DIVERSE SOCIETY: LESSONS FROM THE INTELLIGENT DESIGN CONTROVERSY Alan E. Garfield∗† If we are to be as a shining city upon a hill, it will be because of our ceaseless pursuit of the constitutional ideal of human dignity.1 INTRODUCTION American society is destined to become dramatically more diverse over the course of this century. The Census Bureau estimates that non- Hispanic Whites will constitute less than half the population by mid- century2 and that foreign-born residents already outnumber the entire population of Canada.3 Although the Census Bureau does not track people’s religious affiliation,4 other surveys indicate that America is also ∗. Professor of Law, Widener University School of Law. This Article is a product of my work as the 2005–2007 H. Albert Young Fellow in Constitutional Law and was originally presented as the 2007 H. Albert Young Lecture at Widener University School of Law on April 25, 2007. †. I am grateful to the Young Foundation for its generous support of my scholarship, and to Erin Daly, Michael Goldberg, Stephen Henderson, Patrick Kelly, Laura Ray, and John Wladis for their valuable comments on earlier versions of this work. 1. Justice William J. Brennan, Jr., Address at the Georgetown University Text and Teaching Symposium (Oct. 12, 1985), in THE GREAT DEBATE: INTERPRETING OUR WRITTEN CONSTITUTION 11, 25 (2005 ed.), available at http://www.fed-soc.org/resources/id.50/default.asp. 2. Press Release, U.S. Census Bureau, An Older and More Diverse Nation by Midcentury (Aug. 14, 2008), available at http://www.census.gov/Press-Release/www/releases/archives/population/012496.html.
    [Show full text]
  • An Introduction to Sociobiology: Inclusive Fitness and the Core Genome Herbert Gintis
    An Introduction to Sociobiology: Inclusive Fitness and the Core Genome Herbert Gintis June 29, 2013 The besetting danger is ...mistaking part of the truth for the whole...in every one of the leading controversies...both sides were in the right in what they affirmed, though wrong in what they denied John Stuart Mill, On Coleridge, 1867 A Mendelian populationhas a common gene pool, whichis itscollective or corporate genotype. Theodosius Dobzhansky, Cold Springs Harbor Symposium, 1953. The interaction between regulator and structural genes... [reinforces] the concept that the genotype of the individual is a whole. Ernst Mayr, Populations, Species and Evolution, 1970 Abstract This paper develops inclusive fitness theory with the aim of clarifying its appropriate place in sociobiological theory and specifying the associated principles that render it powerful. The paper introduces one new concept, that of the core genome. Treating the core genome as a unit of selection solves problems concerning levels of selection in evolution. 1 Summary Sociobiology is the study of biological interaction, both intragenomic, among loci in the genome, and intergenomic, among individuals in a reproductive popula- tion (Gardner et al. 2007). William Hamilton (1964) extended the theory of gene frequencies developed in the first half of the Twentieth century (Crow and I would like to thank Samuel Bowles, Eric Charnov, Steven Frank, Michael Ghiselin, Peter Godfrey-Smith, David Haig, David Queller, Laurent Lehmann, Samir Okasha, Peter Richerson, Joan Roughgarden, Elliot Sober, David Van Dyken, Mattijs van Veelen and Edward O. Wilson for advice in preparing this paper. 1 Kimura 1970, B¨urger 2000, Provine 2001) to deal with such behavior.
    [Show full text]
  • INTRODUCTION Is Nature Selfish?
    INTRODUCTION Is Nature Selfish? This book is about whether selfishness and individuality, rather than kindness and cooperation, are basic to biological nature. Darwinism has come to be identified with selfishness and individuality. I criticize this evolutionary perspective by showing it misrepresents the facts of life as we now know them. I focus on social behavior related to sex, gender, and family where the reality of universal selfishness and sexual conflict is supposedly most evident. I show that writings in the professional bio- logical literature advocating a picture of universal selfishness, as well as similar writings in books and articles aimed at the general public, are mistaken. I present my laboratory’s alternative evolutionary theories for social behavior that emphasize cooperation and teamwork and that rely on the mathematics of cooperative games. 1 2 INTRODUCTION: IS NATURE SELFISH? In a previous book, Evolution’s Rainbow,1 I offered a survey of diver- sity in gender and sexuality focusing on animals, together with a brief mention of humans across cultures and history. As I was writing Evolu- tion’s Rainbow, I became increasingly critical of how this diversity is ig- nored in biology curricula worldwide and critical of the language and theories purporting to describe and explain this diversity. The theory to account for sexual behavior in evolutionary biology is called “sexual se- lection,” a topic that originates with Darwin’s writings in 1871.2 I con- cluded that Darwin’s sexual-selection theory was completely false and needed to be replaced by some new and equally expansive theoretical system. I termed the replacement theory social selection but did little more than sketch a few points that such a new theoretical system might contain.
    [Show full text]
  • Holobionts As Units of Selection and a Model of Their Population Dynamics and Evolution
    Biological Theory https://doi.org/10.1007/s13752-017-0287-1 ORIGINAL ARTICLE Holobionts as Units of Selection and a Model of Their Population Dynamics and Evolution Joan Roughgarden1,6 · Scott F. Gilbert2 · Eugene Rosenberg3 · Ilana Zilber‑Rosenberg4 · Elisabeth A. Lloyd5 Received: 15 January 2017 / Accepted: 5 September 2017 © Konrad Lorenz Institute for Evolution and Cognition Research 2017 Abstract Holobionts, consisting of a host and diverse microbial symbionts, function as distinct biological entities anatomically, metabolically, immunologically, and developmentally. Symbionts can be transmitted from parent to offspring by a variety of vertical and horizontal methods. Holobionts can be considered levels of selection in evolution because they are well- defined interactors, replicators/reproducers, and manifestors of adaptation. An initial mathematical model is presented to help understand how holobionts evolve. The model offered combines the processes of horizontal symbiont transfer, within-host symbiont proliferation, vertical symbiont transmission, and holobiont selection. The model offers equations for the popula- tion dynamics and evolution of holobionts whose hologenomes differ in gene copy number, not in allelic or loci identity. The model may readily be extended to include variation among holobionts in the gene identities of both symbionts and host. Keywords Holobiont · Holobiont model · Hologenome · Level of selection · Microbiome · Microbiota · Symbiont Introduction also provides a model for the evolution of a holobiont that combines microbe and host population processes. This article discusses the concept of a holobiont—an ani- Following Lederberg and McCray (2001), a microbiome mal or plant host together with all the microbes living on or refers to an “ecological community of commensal, symbi- in it, exosymbionts and endosymbionts, respectively.
    [Show full text]
  • Views Expressed Are Those of the Publication Date of the Issue
    Dædalus coming up in Dædalus: Dædalus on capitalism Joyce Appleby, John C. Bogle, Lucian Bebchuk, Robert W. Fogel, & democracy Jerry Z. Muller, Richard Epstein, Benjamin M. Friedman, John Journal of the American Academy of Arts & Sciences Dunn, Robin Blackburn, and Gerhard Loewenberg Spring 2007 on the public interest William Galston, E. J. Dionne, Jr., Seyla Benhabib, Jagdish Bhagwati, Adam Wolfson, Lance Taylor, Gary Hart, Nathan Glazer, Robert N. Bellah, Nancy Rosenblum, Amy Gutmann, and Christine Todd Spring 2007: on sex Whitman comment Paul Ehrlich & Marcus W. Feldman The fallacy of genetic reductionism 5 on life Anthony Kenny, Thomas Laqueur, Shai Lavi, Lorraine Daston, Paul Rabinow, Robert P. George, Robert J. Richards, Nikolas Rose, John on Tim Birkhead Promiscuity 13 sex Broome, Jeff McMahan, and Adrian Woolfson Joan Roughgarden Challenging Darwin 23 Brian Charlesworth Why bother? The evolutionary function of sex 37 on nature Leo Marx, William Cronon, Cass Sunstein, Daniel Kevles, Bill McKibben, Harriet Ritvo, Gordon Orians, Camille Parmesan, Anne Fausto-Sterling Frameworks of desire 47 Margaret Schabas, and Philip Tetlock & Michael Oppenheimer Elizabeth Benedict On the Internet 58 Wendy Doniger In the Kamasutra 66 on cosmopolitanism Martha C. Nussbaum, Stanley Hoffmann, Margaret C. Jacob, A. A. Stanley Corngold Franz Kafka & sex 79 Long, Pheng Cheah, Darrin McMahon, Helena Rosenblatt, Samuel Terry Castle The lesbianism of Philip Larkin 88 Scheffler, Arjun Appadurai, Rogers Smith, Peter Brooks, and Craig Lawrence Cohen Homosexuality & hope in India 103 Calhoun annals Greil Marcus A trip to Hibbing High 116 plus poetry by Lawrence Dugan, Molly McQuade, Ted Richer, C. D. Wright &c.; ½ction by Chris Abani, Nadine Gordimer &c.; and poetry Charles Simic Darkened Chessboard & Secret History 125 notes by Keith T.
    [Show full text]
  • Darwinism and the Meaning of Life
    Western Michigan University ScholarWorks at WMU Center for the Study of Ethics in Society Papers Center for the Study of Ethics in Society 6-2007 Darwinism and the Meaning of Life Arthur Falk Western Michigan University Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarworks.wmich.edu/ethics_papers Part of the Bioethics and Medical Ethics Commons, Business Law, Public Responsibility, and Ethics Commons, Ethics and Political Philosophy Commons, Ethics in Religion Commons, and the Legal Ethics and Professional Responsibility Commons WMU ScholarWorks Citation Falk, Arthur, "Darwinism and the Meaning of Life" (2007). Center for the Study of Ethics in Society Papers. 79. https://scholarworks.wmich.edu/ethics_papers/79 This Complete Issue is brought to you for free and open access by the Center for the Study of Ethics in Society at ScholarWorks at WMU. It has been accepted for inclusion in Center for the Study of Ethics in Society Papers by an authorized administrator of ScholarWorks at WMU. For more information, please contact wmu- [email protected]. Center for the Study of Ethics in Society Papers published by the Center Vol. XVI No. 4 June 2007 Darwinism and the Meaning ofLife Arthur Falk Western Michigan University Professor Emeritus of Philosophy Center for the Study of Ethics in Society Founded 1985 Western Michigan University 3024 Moore Hall 1903 West Michigan Avenue Kalamazoo, MI 49008-5328 The purpose of WMU's Center for the Study of Ethics is to encourage and support research, teaching, and service to the university and community in areas of applied and professional ethics. These areas include, but are not restricted to: business, education, engineering, government, health and human services, law, media, medicine, science and technology.
    [Show full text]
  • 1 Introduction
    1 Sexual Selection Studies: 2 Progress, Challenges, and Future Directions 3 Final Report from a NESCent Catalyst Meeting 4 Durham NC, July 15{17, 2013 5 Revision 1.1, December 11, 2013 6 Joan Roughgarden, (Organizer), University of Hawaii, [email protected] 7 Elizabeth Adkins-Regan, Cornell University, [email protected] 8 Erol Akay, University of Pennsylvania, [email protected] 9 Suzanne Alonzo, Yale University, [email protected] 10 Nathan Bailey, University of St. Andrews, [email protected] 11 Jeremy Crawford, UC Berkeley, [email protected] 12 Sasha Dall, University of Exeter, [email protected] 13 Sumit Dhole,University of North Carolina, [email protected] 14 James Fearon, Stanford University, [email protected] 15 Courtney Fitzpatrick, NESCent, clynfi[email protected] 16 Raghavendra Gadagkar, Indian Institute of Science, [email protected] 17 Simon Griffith, Macquarie University, simon.griffi[email protected] 18 Shoshana Grossbard, San Diego State University, [email protected] 19 Camilla Hinde, Wageningen University, [email protected] 20 Thierry Hoquet, Universit Jean Moulin Lyon 3, [email protected] 21 Priya Iyer, Indian Inst. of Science Education and Research, [email protected] 22 Erika Milam, Princeton University, [email protected] 23 Cailin O'Connor, UC Irvine, [email protected] 24 Zofia Prokop, Jagiellonian University, Krakow, zofi[email protected] 25 Richard Prum, Yale University, [email protected] 26 Sarah Richardson, Harvard University, [email protected] 27 Mike Ritchie, University of St. Andrews, [email protected] 28 Kimberly Rosvall, Indiana University, [email protected] 29 Dustin Rubenstein, Columbia University, [email protected] 30 Rebecca Safran, University of Colorado, [email protected] 31 Gustavo Requena Santos, Yale University, [email protected] 32 Maria Servedio, University of North Carolina, [email protected] 33 Sharoni Shafir, The Hebrew University of Jerusalem, shafi[email protected] 34 David Shuker, University of St.
    [Show full text]
  • Joan Roughgarden
    EVOLUTION’S RAINBOW Evolution’s Rainbow Diversity, Gender, and Sexuality in Nature and People Joan Roughgarden UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA PRESS Berkeley Los Angeles London University of California Press Berkeley and Los Angeles, California University of California Press, Ltd. London, England © 2004 by Joan Roughgarden Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data Roughgarden, Joan. Evolution’s rainbow : diversity, gender, and sexuality in nature and people / Joan Roughgarden. p. cm. Includes bibliographical references and index. ISBN 0-520-24073-1 1. Biological diversity. 2. Sexual behavior in animals. 3. Gender identity. 4. Sexual orientation. I. Title. qh541.15.b56.r68 2004 305.3—dc22 2003024512 Manufactured in the United States of America 13 12 11 10 09 08 07 06 05 04 10987654 321 The paper used in this publication meets the minimum requirements of ansi/niso z39.48-1992(R 1997) (Per- manence of Paper). To my sisters on the street To my sisters everywhere To people everywhere Contents Introduction: Diversity Denied / 1 PART ONE ANIMAL RAINBOWS 1 Sex and Diversity / 13 2 Sex versus Gender / 22 3 Sex within Bodies / 30 4 Sex Roles / 43 5 Two-Gender Families / 49 6 Multiple-Gender Families / 75 7 Female Choice / 106 8 Same-Sex Sexuality / 127 9 The Theory of Evolution / 159 PART TWO HUMAN RAINBOWS 10 An Embryonic Narrative / 185 11 Sex Determination / 196 12 Sex Differences / 207 13 Gender Identity / 238 14 Sexual Orientation / 245 15 Psychological Perspectives / 262 16 Disease versus Diversity / 280 17 Genetic Engineering versus Diversity / 306 PART THREE CULTURAL RAINBOWS 18 Two-Spirits, Mahu, and Hijras / 329 19 Transgender in Historical Europe and the Middle East / 352 20 Sexual Relations in Antiquity / 367 21 Tomboi, Vestidas, and Guevedoche / 377 22 Trans Politics in the United States / 387 Appendix: Policy Recommendations / 401 Notes / 409 Index / 461 INTRODUCTION Diversity Denied On a hot, sunny day in June of 1997, I attended my first gay pride pa- rade, in San Francisco.
    [Show full text]
  • Download Anolis Lizards of the Caribbean : Ecology, Evolution, And
    Anolis Lizards of the Caribbean : Ecology, Evolution, and Plate Tectonics: Ecology, Evolution, and Plate Tectonics, Jonathan Roughgarden Professor of Biological Sciences Stanford University, Oxford University Press, 1995, 0195361911, 9780195361919, 226 pages. The Anolis lizards of the Caribbean are ideally suited for the study of evolutionary ecology. Offering fascinating insights into the more than 150 species dispersed throughout the Caribbean islands, Jonathan Roughgarden details the differences between species in a wide range of behavioral and physical characteristics, including foraging behaviors, body size, and habitat use, resulting from evolutionary divergences concurrent with the plate-tectonic origins of the region. This book will be of interest to students and researchers--ecology and theoretical, tropical, and population biology.. DOWNLOAD HERE Food Webs and Niche Space , Joel E. Cohen, Jan 1, 1978, Science, 189 pages. What is the minimum dimension of a niche space necessary to represent the overlaps among observed niches? This book presents a new technique for obtaining a partial answer to .... The reptiles and amphibians of the Dutch Caribbean St. Eustatius, Saba, and St. Maarten, Robert Powell, Robert William Henderson, John S. Jr Parmerlee, 2005, Nature, 192 pages. Anoles , W. P. Mara, Oct 1, 1996, , 48 pages. Describes the physical characteristics, habitat, and behavior of the anole lizard.. Reptiles & amphibians of the Eastern Caribbean , Anita Malhotra, Roger S. Thorpe, Dec 1, 1999, Nature, 134 pages. This book is intended primarily as a filed guide to the one hundred or so species of reptiles and amphibians that occur on the islands of the Eastern Caribbean, from Anguilla .... Biogeography of the West Indies past, present, and future, Charles Arthur Woods, Jan 1, 1990, Nature, 878 pages.
    [Show full text]
  • Table of Contents 1
    Angela Potochnik Materials for External Review Table of Contents 1. Curriculum Vitae 2. Research Summary Publications 3. “Feminist Implications of Model-Based Science,” Studies in History and Philosophy of Science, forthcoming. 4. “Modeling Social and Evolutionary Games,” Studies in History and Philosophy of Biological and Biomedical Sciences, 2012, 43(1): 202-208. 5. “The Limitations of Hierarchical Thinking,” with Brian McGill, Philosophy of Science, 2012, 79(1): 120-140. Primary authorship. 6. Essay Review of Roughgarden’s The Genial Gene, in “Sex and Sensibility: The Role of Social Selection,” Erika Milam, Roberta Millstein, Angela Potochnik, and Joan Roughgarden, Metascience, 2011, 20(2), 253-277. 7. “A Neurathian Conception of the Unity of Science,” Erkenntnis, 2011, 34(3): 305–319. 8. “Explanation and Understanding: An Alternative to Strevens’ Depth,” The European Journal for the Philosophy of Science, 2011, 1(1): 29-38. 9. “Explanatory Independence and Epistemic Interdependence: A Case Study of the Optimality Approach,” The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science, 2010, 61(1): 213–233. 10.“Levels of Explanation Reconceived,” Philosophy of Science, 2010, 77(1): 59–72. 11.“Optimality Modeling in a Suboptimal World,” Biology and Philosophy, 2009, 24(2): 183– 197. 12.“Optimality Modeling and Explanatory Generality,” Philosophy of Science, 2007, 74(5): 680– 691. 13.“Revisiting Galison’s ‘Aufbau/Bauhaus’ in Light of Neurath’s Philosophical Projects,” with Audrey Yap, Studies in History and Philosophy of Science, 2006, 37(3): 469–488. Equal authorship. Works in Progress 14."Biological Explanation," invited contribution to Philosophical Issues in Biology Education, Springer, in revision. 15. "Non-Causal Features of Causal Explanations," revise and resubmit from Australasian Journal of Philosophy.
    [Show full text]