Subject A_Fwd A_: A_National A_ A_HeavyA _ A_VehicleA _ A_Registration A_ A_SchemeA From: denise.spink Sch 4 CTPI To:
[email protected] Date: Thursday, 3 November 2016 03:38:05 PM AEST Sent from my iPhone Begin forwarded message: From: Tanya McDonald < Sch 4 CTPI > Date: 3 November2016 at 1:13:58 pm AWST To: denise spinks <denise.spinks Sch 4 CTPI lsuru Neelagama < Sch 4 CTPI Subject: Fwd: National Heavy Vehicle Registration Scheme Hey chicky, As mentioned - some background material. T Begin forwarded message: From: lsuru Neelagama < Sch 4 CTPI Date: 2 November 2016 at 5:39:02 pm AEST To: kirbyanderso Sch 4 CTPI Subject: National Heavy Vehicle Registration Scheme Hey mate, hope you are well. As discussed with Tanya the following dot points sum up the issue: • The Premier as Transport Minister signed Queensland up, not only to participate in, but also to be the host state for the National Heavy Vehicle Regulator (NHVR). • The NHVR is set up to deliver red tape reduction, business growth, jobs for industry and lowered freight costs and better road safety for the community. • At the upcoming Transport and Infrastructure Council meeting the NHVR is asking jurisdictions for some cash to build a regulatory platform. • This regulatory platform is essential to the regulator delivering business and safetyReleased benefits to Queenslanders under and nationally. RTI Act - TMR • Queensland, which in essence was being asked to contribute about $15 million over three years has said no via cabinet. • If the NHVR, employing 200 odd people in Queensland is rendered ineffective because its host state can't stump up spare change, it will be embarrassing for the Premier as Minister who signed onto the reform.