DOCSLIB.ORG

Further Reading

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Further Reading Further Reading Unless otherwise stated, the place of original publication is London. 1 WELLINGTON AND PEEL 1831-1846 Elizabeth Longford, Wellington, 2 vols (1969; 1972). H. Maxwell, Life of Wellington, 2 vols (1899). G. S. R. Kitson Clark, Peel and the Conservative Party (1929). R. L. Hill, Toryism and the People 18]2-1846 (1929). N. Gash, Politics in the Age of Peel (1953). ---, Reaction and Reconstruction in English Politics 1832-52 (1965). ---, Mr Secretary Peel (1961). ---, Sir Robert Peel (1972). 2 DERBY AND DISRAELI The 14th Earl of Derby has attracted few biographers. George Saints bury's The Earl of Derby (1892) was written from the point of view of a Tory 'who would, at the respective times and in the respective circumstances, have opposed Catho­ lic Emancipation, Reform, the Repeal of the Corn Laws, and the whole Irish Legislation of Mr Gladstone'. T. E. Kebbel's Life of the Earl of Derby (1890) shared much the same attitude. Lord Derby and Victorian Conservatism (Oxford, 1956) by Wilbur Devereux Jones added much information but continued to rely on papers other than Derby's. A new biography, using Derby's papers, is promised by Lord Blake. Robert Stewart's The Politics of Protection (Cambridge, 1971), dealing with the period up to 1852, is largely based on the Derby MSS. Disraelian literature is vast, and it is impossible here to mention more than a personal selection of volumes. However, Robert Blake's Disraeli (1966; 1969) contains a useful list of Disraeli's own publications and a select bibliography. Lord Blake's sympathetic study, based on modern research, is invaluable. But it does not replace the monumental 'official' biography by W. F. Monypenny and G. E. Buckle, The Life of Benjamin Disraeli, Earl of Beaconsfield, 6 vols (1910-20); this, despite selective (and sometimes sensitive) omissions, gives the best series of extracts from Disraeli's correspondence, now preserved by the National Trust at Hughenden Manor. Contemporaries' biographies of Disraeli still deserve consideration, not least because they indicate the variety of views held about their subject. The Times's cautious evaluation (on 20 April 1881) of 'one of the most extraordinary careers recorded in our political annals' is reprinted in Eminent Persons, Vol. II (1893). T. P. O'Connor's vicious Lord Beaconsfield, A Biography originally preceded Disraeli's death and reached an eighth edition (1905). J. A. Froude's works, The Earl of Beaconsfield, K.G. (1890; 1906) and The Life of the Earl of Beacons­ field (Everyman edn, 1914) were more perceptive in some respects than might C.L.-9 248 THE CONSERVATIVE LEADERSHIP 1832-1932 have been expected from an academic anti-semite. Sir William Fraser's Disraeli and His Day (1891) is the product of an occasional M.P. and, as Buckle noted, 'enshrines, if it sometimes mangles, many of the best stories about its hero'. T. E. Kebbel's Life of Lord Beaconsfield (1888) and Lord Beaconsfield and other Tory Memories (1907) are also informative books by a committed Tory who knew Disraeli. A. C. Ewing's The Right Hon. Benjamin Disraeli, Earl of Beaconsfield, K.G., and his Times 2 vols (1882) was a fulsome hagiography, issued in five blue and gold covered parts to adorn Primrose Leaguers' libraries. Georg Brandes's, Lord Beaconsfield: A Study, trans. Mrs George Sturge (1880) was an interesting attempt by a foreigner 'to apply a literary-critical method' by studying 'the statesman Lord Beaconsfield through the novelist Benjamin Disraeli'; at Berlin in 1878 'almost against his will, a feeling of sympathy took possession of [Brandes's] mind'. Inevitably, his own writings are essential reading in any study of Disraeli. The novels have been issued quite often and commentaries on them have regularly appeared. Arguably the most important novels, Coningsby, or The New Generation and Sybil, or The Two Nations, have been republished with sympathetic introductions respectively by Walter Allen (1948) and Walter Sichel (1950). Walter Sichel also wrote the still fascinating Disraeli, a Study in Personality and Ideas (1904). Collections of the novels have been published in 1881 (Longmans, II vols.), 1904-5 (M. W. Dunne, 20 vols.), 1905-6 (John Lane, The Bodley Head, 9 vols.), 1926-7 (Peter Davies, 12 vols.) and 1927-8 (John Lane, The Bodley Head, II vols.). Critical evalua­ tions include M. E. Speare, The Political Novel: Its Development in England and in America (New York, 1924); R. E. G. George, 'The Novels of Disraeli', Nineteenth Century, XCVI (1924); M. Masefield, Peacocks and Primroses (1953); Lord David Cecil, Early Victorian Novelists (1934); S. M. Smith, 'Willenhall and Woodgate: Disraeli's Use of Blue Book Evidence', Review of English Studies, n.s. XIII (1962); Raymond Williams, Culture and Society, 1780-1950 (1958; paperback 1961); Boris Ford (ed.) From Dickens to Hardy (1958) and Robert Blake, 'Disraeli's Political Novels', History Today, XVI (1966). Disraeli's letters to various ladies have been published and constitute an important part of his autobiographical evidence. Correspondence with his devoted sister Sarah has been issued several times and is most conveniently collected in Home Letters by Lord Beaconsfield, 1830-1852, with an introduction by Augustine Birrell (1928). Equally fascinating are the collections in the Marquess of Zetland (ed.) The Letters of Disraeli to Lady Bradford and Lady Chesterfield, 2 vols (1929) and the Marchioness of Londonderry (ed.) Letters from Benjamin Disraeli to Frances Anne, Marchioness of Londonderry, 1837-1861 (1938), which illustrate Disraeli's curious relationships with titled ladies, in additon to providing insights on his political attitudes. Some of Disraeli's major political writings and various journalistic pieces (not all provably by Disraeli) are included in Walter Hutcheon (ed.) Whigs and Whiggism: Political Writings by Benjamin Disraeli (1913). The major collection of speeches is T. E. Kebbel (ed.) Selected Speeches of the late Earl of Beaconsfield, 2 vols (1882). Many 'popular' biographies have been published, including E. T. Raymond's gossipy Disraeli: The Alien Patriot (1925); D. C. Somervell's Disraeli and Gladstone (1925); and Andre Maurois' Disraeli (John Lane, The Bodley Head, 1927; Penguin 1937; Blackie, 1947). Wilfrid Meynell's The Man Disraeli (1927 edn), R. W. Setson-Watson's Disraeli, Gladstone and the Eastern Question (1935) and Sir Harold Beeley's Disraeli (1936) remain useful. Disraeli's continuing appeal to the Right is illustrated in many publications of and about the Con­ servative Party. H. W. J. Edwards's The Radical Tory, with an introduction by G. M. Young (1937) consists mainly of a useful collection of Disraelian extracts and an editorial clarion call for Tory-Radical reaction to modem 'Whiggism'. A FURTHER READING 249 champion of British agriculture, Sir R. George Stapledon, developed a Disraelian interest 'but of yesterday' before writing Disraeli and the New Age (1943). Sir Edward Boyle (ed.) Tory Democrat (1950) reprints the great speeches of 1872 and includes Walter Elliot's assertion that Disraeli's 'approach is his own. His problems are ours'. This was published by the Conservative Political Centre. A similar attitude pervades another C.P.C. publication, Tradition and Change (1954), a collection of essays by such distinguished Tories as Lord Butler, T. E. Utley, Enoch Powell, lain Macleod and Angus Maude. New insights are provided in Cecil Roth's Benjamin Disraeli, Earl of Beacons­ field (New York, 1952) on Disraeli's Judaic Christianity, and in B. R. Jerman's The Young Disraeli (Princeton, 1960) on youthful embarrassments. The later hostility to Disraeli's leadership and his interest in party organisation are treated from different viewpoints in E. J. Feuchtwanger's Disraeli, Democracy and the Tory Party (Oxford, 1968) and 'The Conservative Party under the Impact of the Second Reform Act', Victorian Studies, II (1959), in James Cornford's, 'The Transformation of Conservatism in the Late Nineteenth Century', ibid. VII (1963), and in Paul Smith's Disraelian Conservatism and Social Reform (London and Toronto, 1967) - which is less sympathetic. There is an extensive and controversial literature on the 1867 Reform Act. Asa Briggs's The Age of Improvement (1969 impr.) provides a balanced, general survey. F. H. Herrick's 'The Reform Bill of 1867 and the British Party System', Pacific Historical Review, III (1934) and 'The Second Reform Movement in Britain, 1850-1865' Journal of the History of Ideas, IX (1948) provide sensible antidotes to partisan accounts. Royden Harrison's 'The 10th April of Spencer Walpole', International Review of Social History, VII (1963), reprinted in R. Harrison, Before the Socialists (1965), is a less convincing survey, written from a socialist viewpoint. F. B. Smith's' "Democracy" in the Second Reform Debates', Historical Studies, Australia and New Zealand, XI (1964) and The Making of the Second Reform Bill (Cambridge, 1966) are valuable on details, but should be balanced by Maurice Cowling'S 1867: Disraeli, Gladstone and Revolution (Cambridge, 1967) - a vital Tory analysis - and Gertrude Himmel­ farb's 'The Politics of Democracy: The English Reform Act of 1867', Journal of British Studies, VI (1966) largely reprinted in G. Himmelfarb, Victorian Minds (1968). A subsequent discussion between Mr Smith and Miss Himmelfarb was published in Journal of British Studies, IX (1969). Robert Blake's The Conserva­ tive Party from Peel to Churchill (1970) draws many modern parallels with past events. 3 THE SALISBURY ERA 1881-1902 A. L. Kennedy's Salisbury: Portrait of a Statesman (1953) remains the only rounded biography. Algernon Cecil's study of his uncle in Queen Victoria and Her Prime Ministers (1953) is a model essay. Lady Gwendolen Cecil's privately printed Biographical Studies of the Life and Political Character of Robert, 3rd Marquess of Salisbury is the acknowledged basis of the valuable sketch in the early pages of J.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • HEBEELE, Gerald Clarence, 1932- the PREDICAMENT of the BRITISH UNIONIST PARTY, 1906-1914
    This dissertation has been microfilmed exactly as received 68-3000 HEBEELE, Gerald Clarence, 1932- THE PREDICAMENT OF THE BRITISH UNIONIST PARTY, 1906-1914. The Ohio State University, Ph.D., 1967 History, modem University Microfilms, Inc., Ann Arbor, Michigan © Copyright by Gerald Clarence Heberle 1968 THE PREDICAMENT OF THE BRITISH UNIONIST PARTY, 1906-1914 DISSERTATION Presented in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree Doctor of Philosophy in the Graduate School of The Ohio State University By Gerald c / Heberle, B.A., M.A, ******* The Ohio State University 1967 Approved by B k f y f ’ P c M k ^ . f Adviser Department of History ACKNOWLEDGMENTS I wish to express my deepest gratitude to Professor Philip P. Poirier of the Department of History, The Ohio State University, Dr. Poirier*s invaluable advice, his unfailing patience, and his timely encouragement were of immense assistance to me in the production of this dissertation, I must acknowledge the splendid service of the staff of the British Museum Manuscripts Room, The Librarian and staff of the University of Birmingham Library made the Chamberlain Papers available to me and were most friendly and helpful. His Lordship, Viscount Chilston, and Dr, Felix Hull, Kent County Archivist, very kindly permitted me to see the Chilston Papers, I received permission to see the Asquith Papers from Mr, Mark Bonham Carter, and the Papers were made available to me by the staff of the Bodleian Library, Oxford University, To all of these people I am indebted, I am especially grateful to Mr, Geoffrey D,M, Block and to Miss Anne Allason of the Conservative Research Department Library, Their cooperation made possible my work in the Conservative Party's publications, and their extreme kindness made it most enjoyable.
    [Show full text]
  • British Reaction to the Sepoy Mutiny, 1857-1858 Approved
    BRITISH REACTION TO THE SEPOY MUTINY, 1857-1858 APPROVED: Major /Professor mor Frotessar of History Dean' ot the GraduatGradua' e ScHooT* BRITISH REACTION TO THE SEPOY MUTINY, 1857-185S THESIS Presented to the Graduate Council of the North Texas State University in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements For the Degree of MASTER OF ARTS By Samuel Shafeeq Denton, Texas August, 1970 PREFACE English and Indian historians have devoted considerable research and analysis to the genesis of the Sepoy Mutiny of 1857 but have ignored contemporary British reaction to it, a neglect which this study attempts to satisfy. After the initial, spontaneous, condemnation of Sepoy atrocities, Queen Victoria, her Parliament, and subjects took a more rational and constructive attitude toward the insurrection in India, which stemmed primarily from British interference in Indian religious and social customs, symbolized by the cartridge issue. Englishmen demanded reform, and Parliament-- at once anxious to please the electorate and to preserve the valuable colony of India--complied within a year, although the Commons defeated the first two Indian bills, because of the interposition of other foreign and domestic problems. But John Bright, Lord Edward Stanley, William Gladstone, Benjamin Disraeli, and their friends joined forces to pass the third Indian bill, which became law on August 2, 1858. For this study, the most useful primary sources are Parliamentary Debates. Journals of the House of Commons and Lords, British and Foreign State' Papers, English Historical Queen Victoria's Letters , and the Annual' Re'g'i'st'er. Of the few secondary works which focus on British reac- tion to the Sepoy Mutiny, Anthony Wood's Nineteenth Centirr/ Britain, 1815-1914 gives a good account of British politics after the Mutiny.
    [Show full text]
  • OPENING PANDORA's BOX David Cameron's Referendum Gamble On
    OPENING PANDORA’S BOX David Cameron’s Referendum Gamble on EU Membership Credit: The Economist. By Christina Hull Yale University Department of Political Science Adviser: Jolyon Howorth April 21, 2014 Abstract This essay examines the driving factors behind UK Prime Minister David Cameron’s decision to call a referendum if the Conservative Party is re-elected in 2015. It addresses the persistence of Euroskepticism in the United Kingdom and the tendency of Euroskeptics to generate intra-party conflict that often has dire consequences for Prime Ministers. Through an analysis of the relative impact of political strategy, the power of the media, and British public opinion, the essay argues that addressing party management and electoral concerns has been the primary influence on David Cameron’s decision and contends that Cameron has unwittingly unleashed a Pandora’s box that could pave the way for a British exit from the European Union. Acknowledgments First, I would like to thank the Bates Summer Research Fellowship, without which I would not have had the opportunity to complete my research in London. To Professor Peter Swenson and the members of The Senior Colloquium, Gabe Botelho, Josh Kalla, Gabe Levine, Mary Shi, and Joel Sircus, who provided excellent advice and criticism. To Professor David Cameron, without whom I never would have discovered my interest in European politics. To David Fayngor, who flew halfway across the world to keep me company during my summer research. To my mom for her unwavering support and my dad for his careful proofreading. And finally, to my adviser Professor Jolyon Howorth, who worked with me on this project for over a year and a half.
    [Show full text]
  • Howard J. Garber Letter Collection This Collection Was the Gift of Howard J
    Howard J. Garber Letter Collection This collection was the gift of Howard J. Garber to Case Western Reserve University from 1979 to 1993. Dr. Howard Garber, who donated the materials in the Howard J. Garber Manuscript Collection, is a former Clevelander and alumnus of Case Western Reserve University. Between 1979 and 1993, Dr. Garber donated over 2,000 autograph letters, documents and books to the Department of Special Collections. Dr. Garber's interest in history, particularly British royalty led to his affinity for collecting manuscripts. The collection focuses primarily on political, historical and literary figures in Great Britain and includes signatures of all the Prime Ministers and First Lords of the Treasury. Many interesting items can be found in the collection, including letters from Elizabeth Barrett Browning and Robert Browning Thomas Hardy, Queen Victoria, Prince Albert, King George III, and Virginia Woolf. Descriptions of the Garber Collection books containing autographs and tipped-in letters can be found in the online catalog. Box 1 [oversize location noted in description] Abbott, Charles (1762-1832) English Jurist. • ALS, 1 p., n.d., n.p., to ? A'Beckett, Gilbert A. (1811-1856) Comic Writer. • ALS, 3p., April 7, 1848, Mount Temple, to Morris Barnett. Abercrombie, Lascelles. (1881-1938) Poet and Literary Critic. • A.L.S., 1 p., March 5, n.y., Sheffield, to M----? & Hughes. Aberdeen, George Hamilton Gordon (1784-1860) British Prime Minister. • ALS, 1 p., June 8, 1827, n.p., to Augustous John Fischer. • ANS, 1 p., August 9, 1839, n.p., to Mr. Wright. • ALS, 1 p., January 10, 1853, London, to Cosmos Innes.
    [Show full text]
  • A Companion to Nineteenth- Century Britain
    A COMPANION TO NINETEENTH- CENTURY BRITAIN Edited by Chris Williams A Companion to Nineteenth-Century Britain A COMPANION TO NINETEENTH- CENTURY BRITAIN Edited by Chris Williams © 2004 by Blackwell Publishing Ltd 350 Main Street, Malden, MA 02148-5020, USA 108, Cowley Road, Oxford OX4 1JF, UK 550 Swanston Street, Carlton South, Melbourne, Victoria 3053, Australia The right of Chris Williams to be identified as the Author of the Editorial Material in this Work has been asserted in accordance with the UK Copyright, Designs and Patents Act 1988. All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted, in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording or otherwise, except as permitted by the UK Copyright, Designs and Patents Act 1988, without the prior permission of the publisher. First published 2004 by Blackwell Publishing Ltd Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data A companion to nineteenth-century Britain / edited by Chris Williams. p. cm. – (Blackwell companions to British history) Includes bibliographical references and index. ISBN 0-631-22579-X (alk. paper) 1. Great Britain – History – 19th century – Handbooks, manuals, etc. 2. Great Britain – Civilization – 19th century – Handbooks, manuals, etc. I. Williams, Chris, 1963– II. Title. III. Series. DA530.C76 2004 941.081 – dc22 2003021511 A catalogue record for this title is available from the British Library. Set in 10 on 12 pt Galliard by SNP Best-set Typesetter Ltd., Hong Kong Printed and bound in the United Kingdom by TJ International For further information on Blackwell Publishing, visit our website: http://www.blackwellpublishing.com BLACKWELL COMPANIONS TO BRITISH HISTORY Published in association with The Historical Association This series provides sophisticated and authoritative overviews of the scholarship that has shaped our current understanding of British history.
    [Show full text]
  • David Lloyd George and Temperance Reform Philip A
    University of Richmond UR Scholarship Repository Honors Theses Student Research 1980 The ac use of sobriety : David Lloyd George and temperance reform Philip A. Krinsky Follow this and additional works at: http://scholarship.richmond.edu/honors-theses Recommended Citation Krinsky, Philip A., "The cause of sobriety : David Lloyd George and temperance reform" (1980). Honors Theses. Paper 594. This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the Student Research at UR Scholarship Repository. It has been accepted for inclusion in Honors Theses by an authorized administrator of UR Scholarship Repository. For more information, please contact [email protected]. UNIVERSITY OF RICHMOND LIBRARIES llllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllll/11111 3 3082 01 028 9899 - The Cause of Sobriety: David Lloyd George and Temperance Reform Philip A. Krinsky Contents I. Introduction: 1890 l II. Attack on Misery: 1890-1905 6 III. Effective Legislation: 1906-1918 16 IV. The Aftermath: 1918 to Present 34 Notes 40 Bibliographical Essay 47 Temperance was a major British issue until after World War I. Excessive drunkenness, not alcoholism per se, was the primary concern of the two parliamentary parties. When Lloyd George entered Parliament the two major parties were the Liberals and the Conservatives. Temperance was neither a problem that Parliament sought to~;;lv~~ nor the single issue of Lloyd George's public career. Rather, temperance remained within a flux of political squabbling between the two parties and even among the respective blocs within each Party. Inevitably, compromises had to be made between the dissenting factions. The major temperance controversy in Parliament was the issue of compensation. Both Parties agreed that the problem of excessive drunkenness was rooted in the excessive number of public houses throughout Britain.
    [Show full text]
  • Leadership and Change: Prime Ministers in the Post-War World - Alec Douglas-Home Transcript
    Leadership and Change: Prime Ministers in the Post-War World - Alec Douglas-Home Transcript Date: Thursday, 24 May 2007 - 12:00AM PRIME MINISTERS IN THE POST-WAR WORLD: ALEC DOUGLAS-HOME D.R. Thorpe After Andrew Bonar Law's funeral in Westminster Abbey in November 1923, Herbert Asquith observed, 'It is fitting that we should have buried the Unknown Prime Minister by the side of the Unknown Soldier'. Asquith owed Bonar Law no posthumous favours, and intended no ironic compliment, but the remark was a serious under-estimate. In post-war politics Alec Douglas-Home is often seen as the Bonar Law of his times, bracketed with his fellow Scot as an interim figure in the history of Downing Street between longer serving Premiers; in Bonar Law's case, Lloyd George and Stanley Baldwin, in Home's, Harold Macmillan and Harold Wilson. Both Law and Home were certainly 'unexpected' Prime Ministers, but both were also 'under-estimated' and they made lasting beneficial changes to the political system, both on a national and a party level. The unexpectedness of their accessions to the top of the greasy pole, and the brevity of their Premierships (they were the two shortest of the 20th century, Bonar Law's one day short of seven months, Alec Douglas-Home's two days short of a year), are not an accurate indication of their respective significance, even if the precise details of their careers were not always accurately recalled, even by their admirers. The Westminster village is often another world to the general public. Stanley Baldwin was once accosted on a train from Chequers to London, at the height of his fame, by a former school friend.
    [Show full text]
  • George Canning and the Representation of Liverpool, 1812-1823 1
    'The Pride of my Publick Life': George Canning and the Representation of Liverpool, 1812-1823 1 Stephen M. Lee I George Canning (1770-1827) was one of the most significant figures on the Pittite side of British politics in the first three decades of the nineteenth century, and his successful campaign for a seat at Liverpool in 1812 both illustrated and contributed to the profound changes that his political career underwent during this period. Sandwiched between his failure to return to office in May-July 1812 following the assassination of Spencer Perceval and his decision to disband his personal following (his 'little Senate') in July i8i3,2 this campaign marked for Canning a turn away from the aristocratic political arena of Westminster, which he had come to find so frustrating, towards a political culture which, if at first alien, was replete with new possibilities. Moreover, Canning's experience as representative for Liverpool was indicative of wider changes in the political landscape of early nineteenth-century Britain. Before considering in detail some of the key aspects of Canning's outward turn, however, it will be useful to offer a brief description of the constituency of Liverpool and a short account of the elections that Canning fought there.3 1 This article is a revised version of chapter 3 of Stephen M. Lee, 'George Canning and the Tories, 1801-1827' (unpuh. Ph.D. thesis, Manchester Univ., 1999), PP- 93-128. 2 For a consideration of these two important episodes see Lee, 'Canning and the Tories', pp. 81-91. 1 Unless otherwise stated the following summary of the politics of Liverpool is 74 Stephen M.
    [Show full text]
  • Theme 3 – Ireland Subject: Political Views
    Politics of the 4th Duke of Newcastle http://www.nottingham.ac.uk/mss/elearning/dukeofnewcastle Theme 3 – Ireland Subtheme2 – Catholic Emancipation Transcripts for other primary sources Where the commentary refers to only sections of letters, these passages are shown in red. Contents o Ne C 5266 - Letter from Sir Robert Peel, London, to Henry, 4th Duke of Newcastle under Lyne; 9 Mar. 1821 o Ne C 5267 – Letter from Sir Robert Peel, Whitehall, London, to Henry, 4th Duke of Newcastle under Lyne; 22 Oct. 1824 o Ne C 5271 - Letter from Sir Robert Peel, Whitehall, London, to Henry, 4th Duke of Newcastle under Lyne; 22 Apr. 1825 o Ne C 5329 - Letter from George, 2nd Baron Kenyon, Portman Square, London, to Henry, 4th Duke of Newcastle under Lyne; 9 Mar. 1825 o Ne C 6990 - Letter from John W. Croker, 14 Duke Street, Westminster, London, to Henry Pelham-Clinton, 4th Duke of Newcastle under Lyne; 3 Feb. 1832 o Ne C 5448 - Letter from John W. Croker, West Molesey, Surrey, to Henry, 4th Duke of Newcastle under Lyne; 31 Mar. 1837 o Ne C 6765 - Letter from William Hirst, Boroughbridge, Yorkshire, to Henry Pelham-Clinton, 4th Duke of Newcastle under Lyne; 19 Feb. 1829 o Ne C 6694/1 - Letter from Edward Smith Godfrey, Newark, Nottinghamshire, to Henry Pelham-Clinton, 4th Duke of Newcastle under Lyne; 14 Jun. 1822 o Ne C 5255 - Letter from 'an Irish Protestant', Cork, Ireland, to Henry, 4th Duke of Newcastle under Lyne; 14 Feb. 1823 o Ne C 5344 - Letter from Richard, 2nd Duke of Buckingham and Chandos, Wotton, to Henry, 4th Duke of Newcastle under Lyne; 18 Aug.
    [Show full text]
  • Disraeli and Gladstone: Opposing Forces by Robert Blake
    Disraeli and Gladstone: Opposing Forces By Robert Blake Disraeli and Gladstone were both politicians of extraordinary ability - but their personalities clashed and they heartily loathed each other. Robert Blake, the British constitutional historian, compares their political careers, and charts their stormy relationship. Mutual dislike In the general election of 1 April 1880, the Conservative party under Benjamin Disraeli was crushingly defeated by the Liberals (known as Whigs) - under William Gladstone. Lord Granville, a moderate Whig, wrote to Queen Victoria who would, he knew, be bitterly disappointed by the decision of the electorate: 'Lord Beaconsfield [Disraeli] and Mr Gladstone are men of extraordinary ability; they dislike each other more than is usual among public men. Of no other politician Lord Beaconsfield would have said in public that his conduct was worse than those who had committed the Bulgarian atrocities. He has the power of saying in two words that which drives a person of Mr Gladstone's peculiar temperament into a state of great excitement.' There is no doubt that the two statesmen hated each other. There is no doubt that the two statesmen hated each other. Disraeli referred to his rival in a letter to Lord Derby as '...that unprincipled maniac Gladstone - extraordinary mixture of envy, vindictiveness, hypocrisy and superstition'. And Gladstone more moderately said of his old enemy, 'the Tory party had principles by which it would and did stand for bad and for good. All this Dizzy destroyed'. When Lord Granville wrote to Queen Victoria, Disraeli, born in 1804, had one more year to live; Gladstone, who was born in 1810, had another eighteen.
    [Show full text]
  • Nielsen Collection Holdings Western Illinois University Libraries
    Nielsen Collection Holdings Western Illinois University Libraries Call Number Author Title Item Enum Copy # Publisher Date of Publication BS2625 .F6 1920 Acts of the Apostles / edited by F.J. Foakes v.1 1 Macmillan and Co., 1920-1933. Jackson and Kirsopp Lake. BS2625 .F6 1920 Acts of the Apostles / edited by F.J. Foakes v.2 1 Macmillan and Co., 1920-1933. Jackson and Kirsopp Lake. BS2625 .F6 1920 Acts of the Apostles / edited by F.J. Foakes v.3 1 Macmillan and Co., 1920-1933. Jackson and Kirsopp Lake. BS2625 .F6 1920 Acts of the Apostles / edited by F.J. Foakes v.4 1 Macmillan and Co., 1920-1933. Jackson and Kirsopp Lake. BS2625 .F6 1920 Acts of the Apostles / edited by F.J. Foakes v.5 1 Macmillan and Co., 1920-1933. Jackson and Kirsopp Lake. PG3356 .A55 1987 Alexander Pushkin / edited and with an 1 Chelsea House 1987. introduction by Harold Bloom. Publishers, LA227.4 .A44 1998 American academic culture in transformation : 1 Princeton University 1998, c1997. fifty years, four disciplines / edited with an Press, introduction by Thomas Bender and Carl E. Schorske ; foreword by Stephen R. Graubard. PC2689 .A45 1984 American Express international traveler's 1 Simon and Schuster, c1984. pocket French dictionary and phrase book. REF. PE1628 .A623 American Heritage dictionary of the English 1 Houghton Mifflin, c2000. 2000 language. REF. PE1628 .A623 American Heritage dictionary of the English 2 Houghton Mifflin, c2000. 2000 language. DS155 .A599 1995 Anatolia : cauldron of cultures / by the editors 1 Time-Life Books, c1995. of Time-Life Books. BS440 .A54 1992 Anchor Bible dictionary / David Noel v.1 1 Doubleday, c1992.
    [Show full text]
  • Conservative Parties and the Birth of Democracy
    Conservative Parties and the Birth of Democracy How do democracies form and what makes them die? Daniel Ziblatt revisits this timely and classic question in a wide-ranging historical narrative that traces the evolution of modern political democracy in Europe from its modest beginnings in 1830s Britain to Adolf Hitler’s 1933 seizure of power in Weimar Germany. Based on rich historical and quantitative evidence, the book offers a major reinterpretation of European history and the question of how stable political democracy is achieved. The barriers to inclusive political rule, Ziblatt finds, were not inevitably overcome by unstoppable tides of socioeconomic change, a simple triumph of a growing middle class, or even by working class collective action. Instead, political democracy’s fate surprisingly hinged on how conservative political parties – the historical defenders of power, wealth, and privilege – recast themselves and coped with the rise of their own radical right. With striking modern parallels, the book has vital implications for today’s new and old democracies under siege. Daniel Ziblatt is Professor of Government at Harvard University where he is also a resident fellow of the Minda de Gunzburg Center for European Studies. He is also currently Fernand Braudel Senior Fellow at the European University Institute. His first book, Structuring the State: The Formation of Italy and Germany and the Puzzle of Federalism (2006) received several prizes from the American Political Science Association. He has written extensively on the emergence of democracy in European political history, publishing in journals such as American Political Science Review, Journal of Economic History, and World Politics.
    [Show full text]