DOCSLIB.ORG

Givlaari, INN-Givosiran

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Givlaari, INN-Givosiran 30 January 2020 EMA/CHMP/70703/2020 Committee for Medicinal Products for Human Use (CHMP) Assessment report Givlaari International non-proprietary name: givosiran Procedure No. EMEA/H/C/004775/0000 Note Assessment report as adopted by the CHMP with all information of a commercially confidential nature deleted. Official address Domenico Scarlattilaan 6 ● 1083 HS Amsterdam ● The Netherlands Address for visits and deliveries Refer to www.ema.europa.eu/how-to-find-us Send us a question Go to www.ema.europa.eu/contact Telephone +31 (0)88 781 6000 An agency of the European Union Table of contents 1. Background information on the procedure .............................................. 7 1.1. Submission of the dossier ..................................................................................... 7 1.2. Steps taken for the assessment of the product ........................................................ 9 2. Scientific discussion .............................................................................. 11 2.1. Problem statement ............................................................................................. 11 2.1.1. Disease or condition ........................................................................................ 11 2.1.2. Epidemiology and risk factors ........................................................................... 11 2.1.3. Aetiology and pathogenesis .............................................................................. 11 2.1.4. Clinical presentation, diagnosis and stage/prognosis ............................................ 12 2.1.5. Management ................................................................................................... 12 2.2. Quality aspects .................................................................................................. 14 2.2.1. Introduction.................................................................................................... 14 2.2.2. Active Substance ............................................................................................. 14 General information .................................................................................................. 14 Manufacture, characterisation and process controls ....................................................... 16 Specification ............................................................................................................ 18 Stability................................................................................................................... 19 2.2.3. Finished Medicinal Product ................................................................................ 19 Description of the product and Pharmaceutical development .......................................... 19 Manufacture of the product and process controls .......................................................... 22 Product specification ................................................................................................. 22 Stability of the product .............................................................................................. 23 Adventitious agents .................................................................................................. 24 2.2.4. Discussion on chemical, pharmaceutical and biological aspects.............................. 24 2.2.5. Conclusions on the chemical, pharmaceutical and biological aspects ...................... 24 2.2.6. Recommendation(s) for future quality development ............................................. 24 2.3. Non-clinical aspects ............................................................................................ 25 2.3.1. Introduction.................................................................................................... 25 2.3.2. Pharmacology ................................................................................................. 25 2.3.3. Pharmacokinetics ............................................................................................ 30 2.3.4. Toxicology ...................................................................................................... 39 2.3.5. Ecotoxicity/environmental risk assessment ......................................................... 45 2.3.6. Discussion on non-clinical aspects ..................................................................... 46 2.3.7. Conclusion on the non-clinical aspects ............................................................... 47 2.4. Clinical aspects .................................................................................................. 48 2.4.1. Introduction.................................................................................................... 48 2.4.2. Pharmacokinetics ............................................................................................ 49 2.4.3. Pharmacodynamics .......................................................................................... 54 2.4.4. Discussion on clinical pharmacology ................................................................... 56 2.4.5. Conclusions on clinical pharmacology ................................................................. 57 Assessment report EMA/CHMP/70703/2020 Page 2/101 2.5. Clinical efficacy .................................................................................................. 58 2.5.1. Dose response studies ..................................................................................... 58 2.5.2. Main study ..................................................................................................... 59 2.5.3. Discussion on clinical efficacy ............................................................................ 78 2.5.4. Conclusions on the clinical efficacy .................................................................... 81 2.6. Clinical safety .................................................................................................... 81 2.6.1. Discussion on clinical safety .............................................................................. 87 2.6.2. Conclusions on the clinical safety ...................................................................... 88 2.7. Risk Management Plan ........................................................................................ 88 2.8. Pharmacovigilance ............................................................................................. 94 2.9. New Active Substance ........................................................................................ 94 2.10. Product information .......................................................................................... 95 2.10.1. User consultation ........................................................................................... 95 2.10.2. Additional monitoring ..................................................................................... 95 3. Benefit-Risk Balance ............................................................................. 95 3.1. Therapeutic Context ........................................................................................... 95 3.1.1. Disease or condition ........................................................................................ 95 3.1.2. Available therapies and unmet medical need ....................................................... 96 3.1.3. Main clinical studies ......................................................................................... 96 3.2. Favourable effects .............................................................................................. 96 3.3. Uncertainties and limitations about favourable effects ............................................. 97 3.4. Unfavourable effects ........................................................................................... 97 3.5. Uncertainties and limitations about unfavourable effects ......................................... 98 3.6. Effects Table ...................................................................................................... 98 3.7. Benefit-risk assessment and discussion ................................................................. 99 3.7.1. Importance of favourable and unfavourable effects .............................................. 99 3.7.2. Balance of benefits and risks .......................................................................... 100 3.8. Conclusions ..................................................................................................... 100 4. Recommendations ............................................................................... 100 Assessment report EMA/CHMP/70703/2020 Page 3/101 List of abbreviations AAR Annualized attack rate ADA Anti-drug antibodies ADP ALAD-deficient porphyria AE Adverse events Af 2ʹ-fluoroadenosine AHP Acute hepatic porphyria AIP Acute intermittent porphyria ALA Aminolevulinic acid ALAD Aminolevulinic acid dehydratase ALAS1 Aminolevulinate synthase 1 ALT Alanine aminotransferase Am 2ʹ-O-methyladenosine ANCOVA Analysis of covariance AS Atomic Spectroscopy ASGPR Asialoglycoprotein receptor AST Aspartate aminotransferase AX Anion Exchange BPI-SF Brief Pain Inventory (Short Form) BMI Body mass index cERD circulating extracellular RNA detection Cf 2ʹ-fluorocytidine CHE Chronic high excreters CKD Chronic kidney disease CLR Clearance Cm 2ʹ-O-methylcytidine CPP Critical process parameter CPV Continuous process verification CQA Critical quality attribute DMT 4,4'-dimethoxy trityl DS Drug substance eGFR Estimated
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Carbon Monoxide Down-Regulates Α4β1 Integrin
    Chigaev et al. BMC Immunology 2014, 15:52 http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2172/15/52 RESEARCH ARTICLE Open Access Carbon monoxide down-regulates α4β1 integrin-specific ligand binding and cell adhesion: a possible mechanism for cell mobilization Alexandre Chigaev1,2,3*, Yelena Smagley1,2,3 and Larry A Sklar1,2,3 Abstract Background: Carbon monoxide (CO), a byproduct of heme degradation, is attracting growing attention from the scientific community. At physiological concentrations, CO plays a role as a signal messenger that regulates a number of physiological processes. CO releasing molecules are under evaluation in preclinical models for the management of inflammation, sepsis, ischemia/reperfusion injury, and organ transplantation. Because of our discovery that nitric oxide signaling actively down-regulates integrin affinity and cell adhesion, and the similarity between nitric oxide and CO-dependent signaling, we studied the effects of CO on integrin signaling and cell adhesion. Results: We used a cell permeable CO releasing molecule (CORM-2) to elevate intracellular CO, and a fluorescent Very Late Antigen-4 (VLA-4, α4β1-integrin)-specific ligand to evaluate the integrin state in real-time on live cells. We show that the binding of the ligand can be rapidly down-modulated in resting cells and after inside-out activation through several Gαi-coupled receptors. Moreover, cell treatment with hemin, a natural source of CO, resulted in comparable VLA-4 ligand dissociation. Inhibition of VLA-4 ligand binding by CO had a dramatic effect on cell-cell interaction in a VLA-4/VCAM-1-dependent cell adhesion system. Conclusions: We conclude that the CO signaling pathway can rapidly down-modulate binding of the VLA-4 -specific ligand.
    [Show full text]
  • Erythropoietic Protoporphyrias: Studies of the Natural History, Genotype-Phenotype Correlations, and Psychosocial Impact
    Erythropoietic Protoporphyrias: Studies of the Natural History, Genotype-Phenotype Correlations, and Psychosocial Impact PI: Dr. Manisha Balwani NCT01688895 Document Date: Jun 26, 2015 RDCRN PC #7207 EPP Natural History Version Date: V2 26Jun2015 Rare Diseases Clinical Research Network Porphyrias Consortium Erythropoietic Protoporphyrias: Studies of the Natural History, Genotype-Phenotype Correlations, and Psychosocial Impact This protocol is for research purposes only and should not be copied, redistributed, or used for any other purpose. The procedures in this protocol are intended only for use by the Porphyrias Consortium investigators in carefully controlled settings. The Study Chair of this study should be consulted before using this protocol. Study Chair: Manisha Balwani, MD, MS Department of Genetics & Genomic Sciences Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai One Gustave L. Levy Place, Box 1497 New York, NY 10029 Phone: 212-241-0915 Fax: 212-426-9065 Email: [email protected] Page 1 of 31 RDCRN PC #7207 EPP Natural History Version Date: V2 26Jun2015 Table of Contents Contents Participating Institutions/Investigators Table (contact information)............................................................... 4 1. Synopsis .................................................................................................................................................... 6 1.A. Protocol Overview .............................................................................................................................. 8 2. Objective
    [Show full text]
  • Noncanonical Coproporphyrin-Dependent Bacterial Heme Biosynthesis Pathway That Does Not Use Protoporphyrin
    Noncanonical coproporphyrin-dependent bacterial heme biosynthesis pathway that does not use protoporphyrin Harry A. Daileya,b,c,1, Svetlana Gerdesd, Tamara A. Daileya,b,c, Joseph S. Burcha, and John D. Phillipse aBiomedical and Health Sciences Institute and Departments of bMicrobiology and cBiochemistry and Molecular Biology, University of Georgia, Athens, GA 30602; dMathematics and Computer Science Division, Argonne National Laboratory, Argonne, IL 60439; and eDivision of Hematology, Department of Medicine, University of Utah School of Medicine, Salt Lake City, UT 84132 Edited by J. Clark Lagarias, University of California, Davis, CA, and approved January 12, 2015 (received for review August 25, 2014) It has been generally accepted that biosynthesis of protoheme of a “primitive” pathway in Desulfovibrio vulgaris (13). This path- (heme) uses a common set of core metabolic intermediates that way, named the “alternative heme biosynthesis” path (or ahb), has includes protoporphyrin. Herein, we show that the Actinobacteria now been characterized by Warren and coworkers (15) in sulfate- and Firmicutes (high-GC and low-GC Gram-positive bacteria) are reducing bacteria. In the ahb pathway, siroheme, synthesized unable to synthesize protoporphyrin. Instead, they oxidize copro- from uroporphyrinogen III, can be further metabolized by suc- porphyrinogen to coproporphyrin, insert ferrous iron to make Fe- cessive demethylation and decarboxylation to yield protoheme (14, coproporphyrin (coproheme), and then decarboxylate coproheme 15) (Fig. 1 and Fig. S1). A similar pathway exists for protoheme- to generate protoheme. This pathway is specified by three genes containing archaea (15, 16). named hemY, hemH, and hemQ. The analysis of 982 representa- Current gene annotations suggest that all enzymes for pro- tive prokaryotic genomes is consistent with this pathway being karyotic heme synthetic pathways are now identified.
    [Show full text]
  • Oregon Medicaid Pharmaceutical Services Prior Authorization Criteria
    Oregon Medicaid Pharmaceutical Services Prior Authorization Criteria HEALTH SYSTEMS DIVISION Prior authorization (PA) criteria for fee-for-service prescriptions for Oregon Health Plan clients March 1, 2021 Contents Contents ................................................................................................................................................................ 2 Introduction........................................................................................................................................................... 7 About this guide ......................................................................................................................................... 7 How to use this guide ................................................................................................................................. 7 Administrative rules and supplemental information .................................................................................. 7 Update information............................................................................................................................................... 8 Effective March 1, 2021 ............................................................................................................................ 8 Substantive updates and new criteria ............................................................................................. 8 Clerical changes ............................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Medicines Not Reimbursed Through National Prices and Directly Commissioned by Nhs England V14 Changes to Version 13
    MEDICINES NOT REIMBURSED THROUGH NATIONAL PRICES AND DIRECTLY COMMISSIONED BY NHS ENGLAND V14 CHANGES TO VERSION 13 PUBLISHED APRIL 2019 Changes to v13 Lines removed SUITABLE SPECIALIST FOR CENTRE SUITABLE FOR SHARED ONLY SHARED CARE CARE PRIOR (includng WITH PRIMARY BETWEEN STOPPING MONITORING/ AUDIT APPROVAL outreach CARE (IF DRUG NAME INDICATION COMMISSIONER PBR CATEGORY TA/POLICY STARTING CRITERIA SPECIALIST COMMENT CRITERIA REQUIREMENTS PROFORMA when SUPPORTED AND REQUIRED delivered as BY LOCAL SECONDARY part of a PRESCRIBING CARE VIA provider COMMITTEE) NETWORK network) MODEL PAEDIATRIC INDICATIONS (IN LINE WITH NHS ENGLAND AS PER ADULT TA'S (TA195, TA373, ABATACEPT NHS ENGLAND CYTOKINE MODULATORS NICE NICE NICE √ MEDICINES FOR CHILDREN TA375) POLICY) Now covered by comment 8 PAEDIATRIC INDICATIONS (IN AS PER TA455 OR ADULT TA'S (TA130 LINE WITH NHS ENGLAND (replaced by TA375), TA143 (repalced by ADALIMUMAB NHS ENGLAND CYTOKINE MODULATORS NICE NICE NICE AUDIT √ √ MEDICINES FOR CHILDREN TA383), TA146, TA187, TA199, TA329, POLICY) TA392, TA460) Now covered by comment 8 ALBUTREPENONACOG ALFA HAEMOPHILIA B PRODUCTS ON CMU Blood factor products simplified NHS ENGLAND BLOOD-RELATED PRODUCTS SSC 1652 SSC 1652 SSC 1652 √ FRAMEWORK to blood factor product VIII etc PAEDIATRIC INDICATIONS (IN LINE WITH NHS ENGLAND AS PER IFR AS PER IFR ANAKINRA NHS ENGLAND CYTOKINE MODULATORS NOT ROUTINELY COMMISSIONED AS PER IFR APPROVAL √ MEDICINES FOR CHILDREN APPROVAL APPROVAL POLICY) Now covered by comment 8 AS PER BCSH GUIDELINES ANTIHAEMOPHILIC FACTOR/VON
    [Show full text]
  • Emerging Concepts on the Anti-Inflammatory Actions of Carbon Monoxide-Releasing Molecules (CO-Rms)
    Emerging concepts on the anti-inflammatory actions of carbon monoxide-releasing molecules (CO-RMs). Roberto Motterlini, Benjamin Haas, Roberta Foresti To cite this version: Roberto Motterlini, Benjamin Haas, Roberta Foresti. Emerging concepts on the anti-inflammatory actions of carbon monoxide-releasing molecules (CO-RMs).. Medical Gas Research, BioMed Central, 2012, 2 (1), pp.28. 10.1186/2045-9912-2-28. inserm-00769904 HAL Id: inserm-00769904 https://www.hal.inserm.fr/inserm-00769904 Submitted on 3 Jan 2013 HAL is a multi-disciplinary open access L’archive ouverte pluridisciplinaire HAL, est archive for the deposit and dissemination of sci- destinée au dépôt et à la diffusion de documents entific research documents, whether they are pub- scientifiques de niveau recherche, publiés ou non, lished or not. The documents may come from émanant des établissements d’enseignement et de teaching and research institutions in France or recherche français ou étrangers, des laboratoires abroad, or from public or private research centers. publics ou privés. Motterlini et al. Medical Gas Research 2012, 2:28 http://www.medicalgasresearch.com/content/2/1/28 MEDICAL GAS RESEARCH REVIEW Open Access Emerging concepts on the anti-inflammatory actions of carbon monoxide-releasing molecules (CO-RMs) Roberto Motterlini*, Benjamin Haas and Roberta Foresti* Abstract Carbon monoxide-releasing molecules (CO-RMs) are a class of organometallo compounds capable of delivering controlled quantities of CO gas to cells and tissues thus exerting a broad spectrum of pharmacological effects. CO-RMs containing transition metal carbonyls were initially implemented to mimic the function of heme oxygenase-1 (HMOX1), a stress inducible defensive protein that degrades heme to CO and biliverdin leading to anti-oxidant and anti-inflammatory actions.
    [Show full text]
  • From99mtc@Citrateand9smtc-Pertechnetateion Netate in Saline Solution and Subsequently Treated with a Sephadex G25 Column
    jnin/CONCISE COMMUNICATION BINDING OF 9OmTcION TO HEMOGLOBIN MrinaI Kanti Dewanjee New England Medical Center, Tufts University School of Medicine, Boston, Massachusetts The mechanism and preferential site of bind removed, and the red cells were washed free of ing of 99―'Tcion to hemoglobin had been deter plasma with isotonic saline solution. The cells were mined by the separation of 9@Tc-hemoglobin then incubated with a small volume of oomTc@pertech@ from99mTc@citrateand9smTc-pertechnetateion netate in saline solution and subsequently treated with a Sephadex G25 column. This purified with the content of a kit containing mainly stannous fraction was analyzed by the HC1/acetone mix citrate and glucose. The method of labeling (6) is ture to determine the OsmTc activity distribution described below. with heme and globin. Most of the ssmTc activity Twenty milligrams of SnCl2 were dissolved in 20 is associated with globin fraction. The preferred ml of ACD solution (Abbott). The solution was fit chain for O9mTc ion binding was determined by tered with 0.22-micron Millipore filter paper. A 1-mi the splitting of otmTc.hemoglobin with para aliquot transferred to a serum vial was freeze-dried chloromercuribenzoate solution followed by sep and preserved under nitrogen atmosphere to prevent aration with a diethylaminoethyl cellulose col hydrolysis and oxidation of Sn(II) citrate. The kit umn equilibrated with phosphate buffer. The was reconstituted with I ml of isotonic saline solu @ tsmTc ion, like Cr' ion, tends to bind preferen tion, and the content was transferred to a washed red tially with the beta chain of hemoglobin.
    [Show full text]
  • Mapping Mass Spectral Databases in Genome-Scale Metabolic Networks Reveals Poorly Covered Areas
    H OH metabolites OH Article Mind the Gap: Mapping Mass Spectral Databases in Genome-Scale Metabolic Networks Reveals Poorly Covered Areas Clément Frainay 1 , Emma L. Schymanski 2,3, Steffen Neumann 4,5 , Benjamin Merlet 1, Reza M. Salek 6 , Fabien Jourdan 1,* and Oscar Yanes 7,8,* 1 Toxalim (Research Centre in Food Toxicology), Université de Toulouse, INRA, ENVT, INP-Purpan, UPS, 31555 Toulouse, France; [email protected] (C.F.); [email protected] (B.M.) 2 Eawag: Swiss Federal Institute for Aquatic Science and Technology, Überlandstrasse 133, 8600 Dübendorf, Switzerland; [email protected] 3 Luxembourg Centre for Systems Biomedicine (LCSB), University of Luxembourg, 7, avenue des Hauts-Fourneaux, L-4362 Esch-sur-Alzette, Luxembourg 4 Leibniz Institute of Plant Biochemistry, Department of Stress and Developmental Biology, Weinberg 3, 06120 Halle, Germany; [email protected] 5 German Centre for Integrative Biodiversity Research (iDiv), Halle-Jena-Leipzig Deutscher Platz 5e, 04103 Leipzig, Germany 6 The International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC), 150 Cours Albert Thomas, 69372 Lyon CEDEX 08, France; [email protected] 7 Metabolomics Platform, IISPV, Department of Electronic Engineering, Universitat Rovira i Virgili, Avinguda Paisos Catalans 26, 43007 Tarragona, Spain 8 Spanish Biomedical Research Center in Diabetes and Associated Metabolic Disorders (CIBERDEM), Monforte de Lemos 3-5, 28029 Madrid, Spain * Correspondence: [email protected] (F.J.); [email protected] (O.Y.); Tel.: +33-582-066-395 (F.J.); +34-977-776-617 (O.Y.) Received: 18 July 2018; Accepted: 7 September 2018; Published: 15 September 2018 Abstract: The use of mass spectrometry-based metabolomics to study human, plant and microbial biochemistry and their interactions with the environment largely depends on the ability to annotate metabolite structures by matching mass spectral features of the measured metabolites to curated spectra of reference standards.
    [Show full text]
  • Binding of Immunoglobulin G to Protoporphyrin IX and Its Derivatives: Evidence the Fab Domain Recognizes the Protoporphyrin Ring
    antibodies Article Binding of Immunoglobulin G to Protoporphyrin IX and Its Derivatives: Evidence the Fab Domain Recognizes the Protoporphyrin Ring Koichi Orino Laboratory of Veterinary Biochemistry, School of Veterinary Medicine, Kitasato University, Aomori 034-8628, Japan; [email protected]; Tel.: +81-176-23-3471; Fax: +81-176-23-8703 Received: 15 November 2018; Accepted: 27 December 2018; Published: 4 January 2019 Abstract: Immunoglobulin G (IgG) is known to bind zinc via the Fc domain. In this study, biotinylated protoporphyrin IX (PPIX) was incubated with human IgG and then zinc-immobilized Sepharose beads (Zn-beads) were added to the mixture. After washing the beads, the binding of biotinylated PPIX with IgG trapped on Zn-beads was detected using alkaline phosphatase (ALP)-labeled avidin. Human IgG and its Fab domain coated on microtiter plate wells recognized biotin-labeled PPIX and its derivatives, Fe-PPIX and Zn-PPIX, whereas the Fc domain showed some extent of reaction only with Zn-PPIX. When rabbit anti-bovine transferrin (Tf) antibodies were incubated with biotinylated PPIX, the binding of anti-Tf antibodies with apo-Tf was indirectly detected using ALP-labeled avidin, suggesting that even if the antibody is modified with PPIX, the antibody-antigen reaction occurs. These results suggest that the IgG Fab domain recognizes PPIX and its derivatives, probably via the recognition of the PPIX ring. It is unlikely that binding between the Fab domain and PPIX affects the Fc domain-zinc interaction or antigen-antibody reaction. Keywords: antibody; Fab domain; Fc domain; protoporphyrin; zinc 1. Introduction In 1890, von Behring and Kitasato reported the presence of an agent in the blood that functioned as an anti-toxin, neutralizing diphtheria toxin, and this agent was eventually identified as the antibodies that control infection in body tissues [1,2].
    [Show full text]
  • CDER Breakthrough Therapy Designation Approvals Data As of December 31, 2020 Total of 190 Approvals
    CDER Breakthrough Therapy Designation Approvals Data as of December 31, 2020 Total of 190 Approvals Submission Application Type and Proprietary Approval Use Number Number Name Established Name Applicant Date Treatment of patients with previously BLA 125486 ORIGINAL-1 GAZYVA OBINUTUZUMAB GENENTECH INC 01-Nov-2013 untreated chronic lymphocytic leukemia in combination with chlorambucil Treatment of patients with mantle cell NDA 205552 ORIGINAL-1 IMBRUVICA IBRUTINIB PHARMACYCLICS LLC 13-Nov-2013 lymphoma (MCL) Treatment of chronic hepatitis C NDA 204671 ORIGINAL-1 SOVALDI SOFOSBUVIR GILEAD SCIENCES INC 06-Dec-2013 infection Treatment of cystic fibrosis patients age VERTEX PHARMACEUTICALS NDA 203188 SUPPLEMENT-4 KALYDECO IVACAFTOR 21-Feb-2014 6 years and older who have mutations INC in the CFTR gene Treatment of previously untreated NOVARTIS patients with chronic lymphocytic BLA 125326 SUPPLEMENT-60 ARZERRA OFATUMUMAB PHARMACEUTICALS 17-Apr-2014 leukemia (CLL) for whom fludarabine- CORPORATION based therapy is considered inappropriate Treatment of patients with anaplastic NOVARTIS lymphoma kinase (ALK)-positive NDA 205755 ORIGINAL-1 ZYKADIA CERITINIB 29-Apr-2014 PHARMACEUTICALS CORP metastatic non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) who have progressed on or are intolerant to crizotinib Treatment of relapsed chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL), in combination with rituximab, in patients NDA 206545 ORIGINAL-1 ZYDELIG IDELALISIB GILEAD SCIENCES INC 23-Jul-2014 for whom rituximab alone would be considered appropriate therapy due to other co-morbidities
    [Show full text]
  • Kaiser Permanente Bernard J. Tyson School of Medicine, Inc. Exclusive Provider Organization (EPO) Student Blanket Health Plan Drug Formulary
    Kaiser Permanente Bernard J. Tyson School of Medicine, Inc. Exclusive Provider Organization (EPO) Student Blanket Health Plan Drug Formulary Effective September 1, 2021 Health Plan Products: Kaiser Permanente Bernard J. Tyson School of Medicine, EPO Student Blanket Health Plan offered by Kaiser Permanente Insurance Company For the most current list of covered medications or for help understanding your KPIC insurance plan benefits, including cost sharing for drugs under the prescription drug benefit and under the medical benefit: Call 1-800-533-1833, TTY 711, Monday through Friday, 7 a.m. to 9 p.m. ET Visit kaiserpermanente.org to: • Find a participating retail pharmacy by ZIP code. • Look up possible lower-cost medication alternatives. • Compare medication pricing and options. • Find an electronic copy of the formulary here. • Get plan coverage information. For cost sharing information for the outpatient prescription drug benefits in your specific plan, please visit kp.org/kpic-websiteTBD The formulary is subject to change and all previous versions of the formulary are no longer in effect. Kaiser Permanente Last updated: September 1, 2021 Table of Contents Informational Section...........................................................................................................................................3 ANTIHISTAMINE DRUGS - Drugs for Allergy.....................................................................................................9 ANTI-INFECTIVE AGENTS - Drugs for Infections...........................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Recent Advances in Oligonucleotide Therapeutics in Oncology
    International Journal of Molecular Sciences Review Recent Advances in Oligonucleotide Therapeutics in Oncology Haoyu Xiong 1, Rakesh N. Veedu 2,3 and Sarah D. Diermeier 1,* 1 Department of Biochemistry, University of Otago, Dunedin 9016, New Zealand; [email protected] 2 Centre for Molecular Medicine and Innovative Therapeutics, Murdoch University, Perth 6150, Australia; [email protected] 3 Perron Institute for Neurological and Translational Science, Perth 6009, Australia * Correspondence: [email protected] Abstract: Cancer is one of the leading causes of death worldwide. Conventional therapies, including surgery, radiation, and chemotherapy have achieved increased survival rates for many types of cancer over the past decades. However, cancer recurrence and/or metastasis to distant organs remain major challenges, resulting in a large, unmet clinical need. Oligonucleotide therapeutics, which include antisense oligonucleotides, small interfering RNAs, and aptamers, show promising clinical outcomes for disease indications such as Duchenne muscular dystrophy, familial amyloid neuropathies, and macular degeneration. While no approved oligonucleotide drug currently exists for any type of cancer, results obtained in preclinical studies and clinical trials are encouraging. Here, we provide an overview of recent developments in the field of oligonucleotide therapeutics in oncology, review current clinical trials, and discuss associated challenges. Keywords: antisense oligonucleotides; siRNA; aptamers; DNAzymes; cancers Citation: Xiong, H.; Veedu, R.N.; 1. Introduction Diermeier, S.D. Recent Advances in Oligonucleotide Therapeutics in According to the Global Cancer Statistics 2018, there were more than 18 million new Oncology. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2021, 22, cancer cases and 9.6 million deaths caused by cancer in 2018 [1].
    [Show full text]