DOCSLIB.ORG

Analysing Relational Components of Trust in US & Israeli Online Social Networks

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Analysing Relational Components of Trust in US & Israeli Online Social Networks DIGITAL DIPLOMACY & SOCIAL CAPITAL i Digital Diplomacy & Social Capital: Analysing Relational Components of Trust in US & Israeli Online Social Networks Anthony S. Deos University of Otago | Te Whare Wānanga o Otāgo Author Note Anthony S. Deos, Department of Politics | Te Tari Tōrangapū, University of Otago | Te Whare Wānanga o Otāgo. Correspondence concerning the dissertation should be addressed to Anthony S. Deos, Department of Politics Te Tari Tōrangapū, University of Otago Te Whare Wānanga o Otāgo, PO Box 56, Dunedin 9054, New Zealand Aotearoa. Email: [email protected]. DIGITAL DIPLOMACY & SOCIAL CAPITAL ii Abstract For diplomatic relations, the ability to influence through attraction, or soft power, rather than hard power is preferable in the interconnected 21st century global society. Although debate remains regarding the objectives of public diplomacy, the relational approach offers opportunities for reaching the goal of mutual understanding. The emergence of new public diplomacy and the relational approach coincided with extensive innovation in communication technologies. The digital arena became a possible place for outreach, interaction, and the generation of social capital. These limited studies into digital diplomacy initiatives have focused on quantitative measures and structural aspects. However, the mechanisms that provide for social capital development still require investigation. Therefore, questions remain about whether social capital is being generated through digital diplomacy, and if so, how? This research offers a framework for evaluating the development of trust and reciprocity, presumed prerequisites for social capital generation, through four components of relational interaction: access, openness, credibility, and commitment. This framework is then used to investigate the digital diplomacy initiatives of two specific cases—the US and Israel. Results suggest that digital diplomacy can generate social capital via a relational approach using communicative action. However, social capital is contextual and has both positive and negative implications for diplomatic relations. Keywords: social media, social capital, digital diplomacy, networks, relational public diplomacy DIGITAL DIPLOMACY & SOCIAL CAPITAL iii Dedication Für Klaus Hagemann, MdB Klaus ist ein wahrer Freund und Vorbild. Ein Mann von dem wir alle lernen können. Er hat immer ein offenes Ohr und setzt sich immer für jeden einzelnen Menschen ein. Einzigartig in Maß und Mut! DIGITAL DIPLOMACY & SOCIAL CAPITAL iv Acknowledgements Interestingly, my journey to complete this dissertation resembles the concepts discussed within, including the power of relationships, the intricacies of networks, and the delicacy of bonds. The experience has been truly rewarding with the resulting value greater than the sum of its parts. These pages of text are the physical, tangible products of the process. However, they hold hidden within them the intangible components of these efforts as well. US Supreme Court Justice, Sandra Day O’Connor is credited with having said, “we don't accomplish anything in this world alone ... and whatever happens is the result of the whole tapestry of one's life and all the weavings of individual threads form one to another that creates something.” I have always thought this to be true and, at least in completing this dissertation, I have found it undeniable. While I put great personal effort into this academic endeavour, I could never have been successful without all the people, opportunities, mistakes, and experiences along the way. I owe a great debt of gratitude to my academic supervisors Dr. Chris Rudd, Dr. Lena Tan, and Dr. Erika Pearson for their ever-helpful feedback, unending encouragement, and generosity with time. In addition, I thank Prof. Stephen Knowles who served as convenor and the three anonymous examiners for their thoughtful insight and feedback. In completing this task, I had great help from my colleagues, and the professional and academic staff at the University of Otago to whom I offer my appreciation. In addition, I am indebted to Dr. Geoff Pigman and Jacob Westlund for their interest, support, and feedback on drafts. A special note of thanks goes to Julie, Poppy, and Tom Cooper—all of whom welcomed me with open arms into their home and without whom I would not have been able to reach the goal-line. Likewise, I am grateful to Sheryl, Mike, and the entire Wright family, who always offered me great friendship and helpful advice. My family offered me great reassurance, without which I would have often found myself lost. Moreover, I am so very appreciative for my New Zealand whānau (extended family). The list is surely too long to include here, but I would be remiss if I did not acknowledge their friendship, love, and support. Finally, and most especially, I thank my partner Jeremy, for his constant care, open ears, and saintly patience. In the end, I have gained not just a great deal of knowledge about the presented research topic and academic process generally, but most significantly about myself. I assume that this is the goal of the process and for this opportunity I am thankful. DIGITAL DIPLOMACY & SOCIAL CAPITAL v Table of Contents Abstract…………………………………………………………………….……………………………………………..……ii Dedication……………………………………………………………….…………………………………………...………iii Acknowledgements………………………………………………….…………………………………………………...iv Table of Contents……………………………………………………………….………………………………………….v List of Tables & Figures...…………………………………………………….………………………………………..vii List of Abbreviations……………………………………………………………….…………………………………….xi Part 1: Theoretical Foundation & Research Methodology................................................................... 1 Outlining Key Assumptions & Objectives ............................................................................................. 11 Thesis Outline .................................................................................................................................................. 14 Chapter 1: Generating Social Capital via Relational Digital Diplomacy........................................ 15 1.1: The new public diplomacy and nuanced approaches ............................................................ 18 1.1.1: Towards a ‘Public’ Diplomacy: The Impact of Public Opinion ....................................... 19 1.1.2: A digital relational approach .................................................................................................... 28 1.1.3: Networks, ICTs, & diplomatic benefit ...................................................................................... 42 1.2: The social media revolution in public diplomacy .................................................................... 51 1.2.1: Avoiding biases & technological determinism in digital diplomacy ............................ 63 1.2.2: A note on actor network theory ................................................................................................ 75 Chapter 2: Relational Social Capital through Digital Diplomacy ..................................................... 82 2.1: Connecting social capital and public diplomacy ....................................................................... 88 2.2: Social capital & social media: the components of trust & reciprocity ............................. 92 2.3: Social capital and digital diplomacy .............................................................................................. 98 Chapter 3: Research Methodology & Methods Overview ............................................................... 105 3.1: Research design: case studies ....................................................................................................... 106 3.1.1: The United States & Israel: why these cases? .................................................................... 108 3.1.2: Ensuring rigor in the research design ................................................................................. 111 3.1.3: The research timeline ................................................................................................................ 113 3.2: Methods: collecting data & analysing the process ................................................................ 114 3.2.1: Archives, government documents, & media reports ....................................................... 115 3.2.2: Semi-structured interviews in Washington, D.C., Tel Aviv, & Jerusalem ................. 116 3.2.3: Cyber-ethnographic observation as a network member .............................................. 118 3.2.4: Operationalizing social capital & retracing data to theory test ................................ 123 3.3: Limitations ............................................................................................................................................ 126 Part 2: The Case Studies ................................................................................................................................ 129 DIGITAL DIPLOMACY & SOCIAL CAPITAL vi Chapter 4: Case Study 1—The United States of America ................................................................ 132 4.1: Out of isolation: US diplomacy from the progressive era to post-9/11 ....................... 136 4.2: New PD in the US: social capital, relationships, & digital diplomacy ............................ 147 4.3: Re-engaging the world with social media digital diplomacy ........................................... 158 4.3.1: The State department’s first forays in the digital realm
Load more

Recommended publications
  • The Populist Style and Public Diplomacy : Kayfabe As Performative Agonism in Trump’S Twitter Posts
    This is a repository copy of The populist style and public diplomacy : kayfabe as performative agonism in Trump’s twitter posts. White Rose Research Online URL for this paper: http://eprints.whiterose.ac.uk/166120/ Version: Published Version Article: Surowiec, P. and Miles, C. (2021) The populist style and public diplomacy : kayfabe as performative agonism in Trump’s twitter posts. Public Relations Inquiry, 10 (1). pp. 5-30. ISSN 2046-147X https://doi.org/10.1177/2046147X20979294 Reuse This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) licence. This licence allows you to distribute, remix, tweak, and build upon the work, even commercially, as long as you credit the authors for the original work. More information and the full terms of the licence here: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/ Takedown If you consider content in White Rose Research Online to be in breach of UK law, please notify us by emailing [email protected] including the URL of the record and the reason for the withdrawal request. [email protected] https://eprints.whiterose.ac.uk/ 979294 PRI0010.1177/2046147X20979294Public Relations InquirySurowiec and Miles research-article2020 Article Public Relations Inquiry 1 –26 The populist style and public © The Author(s) 2020 diplomacy: kayfabe Article reuse guidelines: sagepub.com/journals-permissions as performative agonism https://doi.org/10.1177/2046147X20979294DOI: 10.1177/2046147X20979294 in Trump’s Twitter posts journals.sagepub.com/home/pri Paweł Surowiec University of Sheffield, UK Christopher Miles Bournemouth University, UK Abstract This article theorises the interplay between public diplomacy and populism. Building on Baudrillard’s simulacra, we advance the hybridity approach to soft power statecraft by analysing a cultural shift in US presidential public diplomacy.
    [Show full text]
  • German Jewish Refugees in the United States and Relationships to Germany, 1938-1988
    UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN DIEGO “Germany on Their Minds”? German Jewish Refugees in the United States and Relationships to Germany, 1938-1988 A dissertation submitted in partial satisfaction of the requirements for the degree Doctor of Philosophy in History by Anne Clara Schenderlein Committee in charge: Professor Frank Biess, Co-Chair Professor Deborah Hertz, Co-Chair Professor Luis Alvarez Professor Hasia Diner Professor Amelia Glaser Professor Patrick H. Patterson 2014 Copyright Anne Clara Schenderlein, 2014 All rights reserved. The Dissertation of Anne Clara Schenderlein is approved, and it is acceptable in quality and form for publication on microfilm and electronically. _____________________________________________________________________ _____________________________________________________________________ _____________________________________________________________________ _____________________________________________________________________ _____________________________________________________________________ Co-Chair _____________________________________________________________________ Co-Chair University of California, San Diego 2014 iii Dedication To my Mother and the Memory of my Father iv Table of Contents Signature Page ..................................................................................................................iii Dedication ..........................................................................................................................iv Table of Contents ...............................................................................................................v
    [Show full text]
  • Barack Obama Deletes References to Clinton
    Barack Obama Deletes References To Clinton Newton humanize his bo-peep exploiter first-rate or surpassing after Mauricio comprises and falls tawdrily, soldierlike and extenuatory. Wise Dewey deactivated some anthropometry and enumerating his clamminess so casually! Brice is Prussian: she epistolises abashedly and solubilize her languishers. Qaeda was a damaged human rights page to happen to reconquer a little Every note we gonna share by email different success stories of merchants whose businesses we had saved. On clinton deleted references, obama told us democratic nomination of. Ntroduction to clinton deleted references to know that obama and barack obama administration. Rainfall carries into clinton deleted references to the. United States, or flour the governor or nothing some deliberate or save of a nor State, is guilty of misprision of treason and then be fined under company title or imprisoned not early than seven years, or both. Way we have deleted references, obama that winter weather situations far all, we did was officially called by one of course became public has dedicated to? Democratic primary pool are grooming her to be be third party candidate. As since been reported on multiple occasions, any released emails deemed classified by the administration have been done so after the fact, would not steer the convict they were transmitted. New Zealand as Muslim. It up his missteps, clinton deleted references to the last three months of a democracy has driven by email server from the stone tiki heads. Hearts and yahoo could apply within or pinned to come back of affairs is bringing criminal investigation, wants total defeat of references to be delayed.
    [Show full text]
  • Trump's Twiplomacy
    Trump’s Twiplomacy: A New Diplomatic Norm? Kajsa Hughes Two-year Political Science MA programme in Global Politics and Societal Change Dept. of Global Political Studies Course: Political Science Master’s thesis ST631L (30 credits) Thesis submitted: Summer, 2020 Supervisor: Corina Filipescu Kajsa Hughes 19940526-2867 Political Science: Global Politics Abstract This study examined how Trump frames various countries and their leaders and whether the framing changes from different factors. It also observed whether foreign leaders were following the same path as Trump in their diplomatic communication and interaction on Twitter. This was to contribute more knowledge that connects global politics with social media to see if changes of frames through Twitter caused any global politica l consequences. Theories including realist constructivism and framing theory, along with concepts of social norms, political context, events, and enemy images, were applied to the study. Using directed content analysis, together with longitudinal and comparative elements, the findings showed a separation between Trump’s and the other leaders’ tweets. Almost all tweets were connected to the concepts, and various techniques of framing were identified in tweets from most leaders. However, Trump’s informa l, disdain, and dramatics in his tweets have distanced himself from the rest of the leaders’ posts. Although a couple of leaders’ attempt to be hostile towards Trump and the U.S. in their tweets, they were still formal. It shows that not only is Trump’s Twiplomacy a reflection of American superpower forcefulne ss, but also a unique form that the rest choose to ignore. Keywords: framing, social norms, Trump, Twiplomacy, Twitter, Word count: 21,979 1 Kajsa Hughes 19940526-2867 Political Science: Global Politics Table of Contents 1.
    [Show full text]
  • Social Media Manipulation 2020 How Social Media Companies Are Failing to Combat Inauthentic Behaviour Online
    978-9934-564-92-5 SOCIAL MEDIA MANIPULATION 2020 HOW SOCIAL MEDIA COMPANIES ARE FAILING TO COMBAT INAUTHENTIC BEHAVIOUR ONLINE PREPARED BY THE NATO STRATEGIC COMMUNICATIONS CENTRE OF EXCELLENCE ____________________________________________________________________________ 1 ISBN: 978-9934-564-92-5 Project Manager: Rolf Fredheim Authors: Sebastian Bay, Anton Dek, Iryna Dek, Rolf Fredheim Research: Singularex Copy Editing: Anna Reynolds Design: Kārlis Ulmanis This report was completed in November 2020, based on an experiment that was conducted September to October 2020. Singularex is a Social Media Intelligence and Analytics company based in Kharkiv, Ukraine. Website: www.singularex.com Email: [email protected] NATO STRATCOM COE 11b Kalnciema Iela Riga LV1048, Latvia www.stratcomcoe.org Facebook/stratcomcoe Twitter @stratcomcoe This publication does not represent the opinions or policies of NATO or NATO StratCom COE. © All rights reserved by the NATO StratCom COE. Reports may not be copied, reproduced, distributed or publicly displayed without reference to the NATO StratCom COE. The views expressed here do not represent the views of NATO. 2 _____________________________________________________________________________ EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Introduction The experiment Antagonists, from foreign governments to To test the ability of social media compa- terror groups, anti-democratic groups, and nies to identify and remove manipulation, commercial companies, continually seek to we bought engagement on thirty-nine Face- manipulate public debate through the use of book, Instagram, Twitter, YouTube, and TikTok coordinated social media manipulation cam- posts, using three high-quality Russian social paigns. These groups rely on fake accounts media manipulation service providers. For and inauthentic behaviour to undermine on- 300 € we received inauthentic engagement in line conversations, causing online and offline the form of 1 150 comments, 9 690 likes, 323 harm to both society and individuals.
    [Show full text]
  • Web 2.0 and Public Diplomacy Hannes R. Richter University Of
    Web 2.0 and Public Diplomacy Hannes R. Richter University of Innsbruck The effectiveness of public diplomacy is measured in minds changed, not Dollars spent or slick production packages. - Joseph S. Nye, Jr. This research is supported by a stipend of the Austrian Marshall Plan Foundation, Vienna, Austria 2 Introduction Scholarly interest in the role of the Internet and its applications in political communication has been growing rapidly over the past years and has reached ultimate prominence with the presidential campaign of Barack Obama. The web’s role in international political communication and specifically as a tool of public diplomacy only recently began capturing wider audiences. Particularly with the rise of the social web and prominent applications like Facbook and Twitter, scholars and practitioners of public diplomacy alike became interested in how those tools can be used in the practice of public diplomacy. Recent developments have brought Twitter to the forefront of the debate; events surrounding protests in the aftermath of the Iranian election in what has been called the Twitter Revolution (e.g. Berman 2009) have been more and more communicated through tweets and other new media channels than the regular media. This comes as no surprise as the Iranian regime tried to hinder communications and reporting on the events to the outside world, but (so far) did not manage to get a full handle on these new communication channels. The importance of the new tools has been recognized by government officials on numerous occasions; Secretary of State Hillary Clinton asked Twitter to postpone system maintenance so Iranians could continue to feed information through it (Shater 2009).
    [Show full text]
  • The Seaman Family in America Captain John Seaman
    THE SEAMAN FAMILY IN AMERICA AS DESCENDED FROM CAPTAIN JOHN SEAMAN OF HEMPSTEAD, LONG ISLAND COMPILED BY MARY THOMAS SEAMAN Author of"Links in Genealogy" Life Member of The long Island Historical Society ASSISTl!I> BY JAMES HAVII.AND SEAMAN. JR. Member of the Loag Islaod Wstorial Socicly 1928 TOBlAS A. WRIGHT, INC. PRrNTERS AND PUBLISHERS NEW\"ORK SEAMAN FAMILY All.'-fS-Bal't'V wavy of six argent and a."1.1re, a c:rcscent or. CRJ;ST-A demi-sea-horse salient argent. Mono-Spcetcmur :igendo (kt us be judged by out actiot\S). CcS'aE coNTE.,'TS OF THIS BOOK ARE AUTHEllo'TIC TO THE BEST OF MY K.-.OWLEDGE. THE CONSIDEKATIO:S OF THE PUBLIC IS ASKED FOR SUCH ERRORS AS MAY J:sADVERTE.''TLY SLIP J:sTO THE MOST CAREFULLY PRE­ PARED MA!lo'USCRIPT. MARY THOMAS SEAMA:S ILLUSTRATIONS Coat of Arms and Crest . Frontispiece PAGE Deed of sale of land from Indians to John Seaman and others, July 4, 1657 . 16 Account of the Seaman Family, by Jordan Seaman, January, 18oo • 24 Deed of gift from John Seaman, senior, to sons Nathaniel and Richard, March 17, 1692/3 . 28 Deed of gift of Nathaniel Seaman to son Thomas, August 31, 1752 . 40 1\farriage certificate of NathaniP.1 Seaman and Rachel \Vil!is, August 9. 16g5 42 Deed of sale of land bv Richard Seaman to brother Nathaniel, September II, 1745 44 Deed of sale of land from Thomas Seaman to brothers Jacob, Nathaniel and Samuel, January 30, 1759 61 Marriage certificate of Thomas Seaman and Hannah \Villets, December 3, 174r/2 .
    [Show full text]
  • Routledge Handbook of Public Diplomacy the Spectrum of Listening
    This article was downloaded by: 10.3.98.104 On: 27 Sep 2021 Access details: subscription number Publisher: Routledge Informa Ltd Registered in England and Wales Registered Number: 1072954 Registered office: 5 Howick Place, London SW1P 1WG, UK Routledge Handbook of Public Diplomacy Nancy Snow, Nicholas J. Cull The Spectrum of Listening Publication details https://www.routledgehandbooks.com/doi/10.4324/9780429465543-5 Luigi Di Martino Published online on: 28 Jan 2020 How to cite :- Luigi Di Martino. 28 Jan 2020, The Spectrum of Listening from: Routledge Handbook of Public Diplomacy Routledge Accessed on: 27 Sep 2021 https://www.routledgehandbooks.com/doi/10.4324/9780429465543-5 PLEASE SCROLL DOWN FOR DOCUMENT Full terms and conditions of use: https://www.routledgehandbooks.com/legal-notices/terms This Document PDF may be used for research, teaching and private study purposes. Any substantial or systematic reproductions, re-distribution, re-selling, loan or sub-licensing, systematic supply or distribution in any form to anyone is expressly forbidden. The publisher does not give any warranty express or implied or make any representation that the contents will be complete or accurate or up to date. The publisher shall not be liable for an loss, actions, claims, proceedings, demand or costs or damages whatsoever or howsoever caused arising directly or indirectly in connection with or arising out of the use of this material. 3 The Spectrum of Listening Luigi Di Martino Introduction Gathering information on a nation’s friends and enemies has always been a key characteristic of diplomacy.1 With the emergence of public diplomacy and its emphasis on foreign publics, infor- mation-gathering activities have been reframed as “listening” by public diplomacy scholarship in order to distinguish it from propaganda and earlier forms of information gathering in diplomacy.
    [Show full text]
  • Digital Diplomacy: Global Trends, Opportunities and Challenges
    Digital Diplomacy: Global Trends, Opportunities and Challenges By Lucas Hibbeln Publication Details Published: March 3, 2021 Publisher: Invictus Corporation Ltd. Department: Emerging Technologies and Law Author: Lucas Hibbeln Editors: Harshita Bhattacharya, Ajatshatru Bhattacharya © INVICTUS CORPORATION LTD. and the author 2021 No part of this work may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying, microfilming, recording or otherwise, without written permission from the Publisher, with the exception of any material supplied specifically for the purpose of being entered and executed on a computer system, for exclusive use by the purchaser of the work. The use of general descriptive names, registered names, trademarks, service marks, etc., in this publication does not imply, even in the absence of a specific statement, that such names are exempt from the relevant protective laws and regulations and therefore free for general use. Produced, published and distributed by INVICTUS CORPORATION LTD., The Hague, The Netherlands Website: https://invictuscorp.org/ The registered company address is: New World Campus, Spaarneplein 2, 2515 VK The Hague, The Netherlands Abstract Since the outbreak of COVID-19, the role of digital tools in helping facilitate business, education, and governance has become increasingly relevant. In the context of international relations, the pandemic has shed light on the term ‘digital diplomacy’, the use of digital tools to facilitate dialogue relevant to foreign affairs. As new technologies relating to artificial intelligence (AI) and internet communication technologies (ICTs) pervade even the well—established area of interstate communication, it is important to assess the overall impact that such technologies have on the field of international relations.
    [Show full text]
  • The Apartheid Smear Israel Is Not an Apartheid State the Allegation Damages the Peace Process
    The ApArTheid SmeAr Israel is not an apartheid state The allegation damages the peace process Professor Alan Johnson BRITAIN ISRAEL COMMUNICATIONS & RESEARCH CENTRE 2 The Apartheid Smear As a movement we recognise the legitimacy of Palestinian nationalism just as we recognise the legitimacy of Zionism as a Jewish nationalism. We insist on the right of the state of Israel to exist within secure borders, but with equal vigour support the Palestinian right to national self-determination. We are gratified to see that new possibilities of resolving the issue through negotiation have arisen since the election of a new government in Israel. We would wish to encourage that process, and if we have the opportunity, to assist.1 Nelson mandela, 1993 The whole world must see that Israel must exist and has the right to exist, and is one of the great outposts of democracy in the world … Peace for Israel means security and that security must be a reality.2 martin Luther King Jr, 1967 The charge that Israel is an apartheid state is a false and malicious one that precludes, rather than promotes, peace and harmony.3 Judge richard J. Goldstone (former Justice of the South African Constitutional Court, who led the United Nations 2008-9 fact-finding mission on the Gaza conflict), 2011 If Israel were an apartheid state, I, for example, would not be allowed to work for a Jewish newspaper or live in a Jewish neighbourhood or own a home. The real apartheid is in Lebanon, where there is a law that bans Palestinians from working in over 50 professions.
    [Show full text]
  • Diplomacy, Globalization and Heteropolarity: the Challenge of Adaptation
    Diplomacy, Globalization and Heteropolarity: The Challenge of Adaptation by Daryl Copeland A POLICYAugust PAPER, 2013 POLICY PAPER Diplomacy, Globalization and Heteropolarity: The Challenge of Adaptation* by Daryl Copeland CDFAI Senior Fellow August, 2013 Prepared for the Canadian Defence & Foreign Affairs Institute 1600, 530 – 8th Avenue S.W., Calgary, AB T2P 3S8 www.cdfai.org ©2013 Canadian Defence & Foreign Affairs Institute ISBN: 978-1-927573-18-1 Executive Summary Globalization is the defining historical process of our times, conditioning, if not determining, outcomes across vast swathes of human activity. At the same time, a heteropolar world is emerging, one in which various and competing sources of power and influence are based more on difference than on similarity. In the face of these transformative forces, diplomacy is struggling to evolve. To date, none of the key elements of the diplomatic ecosystem – the foreign ministry, the Foreign Service, or the diplomatic business model – have adapted well, or quickly enough. If diplomacy is to achieve its full potential as a non-violent approach to the management of international relations and global issues through political communications, then radical reform will be required. These observations are particularly apt in Canada, where diplomatic performance has in recent years been troubled. The foreign ministry (formerly DFAIT), still struggling to absorb the deep cuts contained in the federal budget of March 2012, finds itself in the midst of a complicated merger with the aid agency (formerly CIDA). This unanticipated amalgamation has resulted in significant uncertainty and dislocation in both organizations, and is reminiscent of the disastrous split, and then re-integration, of the foreign and trade ministries 2004-06.
    [Show full text]
  • On January 3, Palestinian Security Authorities in the West
    2002 On January 3, Palestinian security authorities in the West Bank city of Hebron descended on the offices of the weekly newspaper, Hebron Times, and ordered its immediate closure, according to CPJ. No official reason was given, but staff from the newspaper alleged that the PNA was responding to US "pressure" to close the paper, which has frequently criticised Israel and the United States' Middle East policies. According to information obtained by RSF, since the beginning of 2002, with some exceptions, the GPO has not renewed press cards for Palestinians working for international media organisations. This decision, which affects journalists living in the Occupied Territories who work in Jerusalem as well as those who both live and work in the Occupied Territories, is said to be for "security reasons“. Without press cards, Palestinian journalists are at the mercy of the Israeli security forces, who have the authority to refuse them access. For example, Awad Awad, a Palestinian photographer for Agence France-Presse (AFP) in Ramallah, was unable to enter Jerusalem on January 14. He was stopped at a checkpoint because he did not have an Israeli press card. On January 15, 29 media organisations in Israeli and Palestinian Authority territories, including Reuters and RSF, issued a joint statement expressing concern and urging the government of Israel to renew accreditation of Palestinian journalists. The new regulation, which went into force on January 1, appears to be designed to prevent fair and balanced coverage of the Israeli-Palestinian conflict, coming on the back of a year in which Palestinian journalists had largely been prevented from entering Israel due to the "security situation".
    [Show full text]