Mining and the Right to Water in Porgera, Papua New Guinea

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Mining and the Right to Water in Porgera, Papua New Guinea Red Water: Mining and the Right to Water in Porgera, Papua New Guinea (February 2019) About the Authors The Columbia Law School Human Rights Clinic works to advance human rights around the world, and to train the next generation of strategic advocates for social justice. The clinic works in partnership with civil society organizations and communities to carry out human rights investigations, legal and policy analysis, litigation, report-writing, and advocacy. The Advanced Consortium on Cooperation, Conflict and Complexity (AC4) at Columbia University’s Earth Institute works to bring sustainable solutions to the issues of violent conflict, peace, and sustainable resource management. The Earth Institute, founded in 1995, leverages the expertise of its research centers, scientists, postdoctoral fellows, and staff at Columbia University to generate solutions for sustainable development. This unique institute brings together the intellectual, practical and theoretical resources needed to address some of the world’s most difficult problems including environmental sustainability, climate change and poverty. iii Acknowledgements This report is part of an ongoing human rights investigation and advocacy project regarding the impacts of gold mining operations in Porgera, Papua New Guinea. Since 2006, researchers from the human rights clinics of Harvard Law School, New York University School of Law, and Columbia Law School have investigated allegations of human rights violations at the site of the Porgera Joint Venture mine. Prior work has addressed allegations of widespread abuses by security forces at the mine – including arbitrary detentions, physical assaults, sexual violence, and killings – in violation of the rights of local residents. This report, jointly prepared by the Columbia Law School Human Rights Clinic and the Advanced Consortium on Cooperation, Conflict and Complexity (AC4) of Columbia University’s Earth Institute, analyzes the impacts of the mine on the environment and communities immediately surrounding the mine, with a particular focus on local water sources, the right to water, and the extent to which the government of Papua New Guinea and the mining companies have met their international human rights obligations and responsibilities. The Human Rights Clinic and AC4 would like to express their profound gratitude to the many people in Porgera whose experiences and demands for justice are the foundation for this report. The Clinic and AC4 would also like to thank the interpreters who provided their invaluable expertise in ensuring the careful relay of Porgerans’ important narratives. The Clinic and AC4 would also like to acknowledge and express gratitude for the external reviewers who provided invaluable feedback on drafts of this report. This report’s lead authors are Sarah Knuckey, Lieff Cabraser Associate Clinical Professor of Law, Director of the Human Rights Clinic and Faculty Co-Director of the Human Rights Institute, Columbia Law School; Benjamin Hoffman, Deputy Director, Columbia Law School Human Rights Clinic; Joshua Fisher, Director of the Advanced Consortium on Cooperation, Conflict, and Complexity (AC4) at the Earth Institute, Columbia University; and Tess Russo, Adjunct Associate Research Scientist, Columbia Water Center at the Earth Institute, Columbia University and formerly RL Slingerland Early Career Professor of Geosciences, Pennsylvania State University, Department of Geosciences. Contributing Authors and Research Team Beth Hoagland, Ph. D. ’18, Pennsylvania State University Alison Borochoff-Porte, J.D. ’15, Columbia Law School Human Rights Clinic Stephanie Persson, J.D. ’15, Columbia Law School Human Rights Clinic Holly Stubbs, J.D. ’15, Columbia Law School Human Rights Clinic Genevieve Taylor, LLM ’15, Columbia Law School Human Rights Clinic Whitney Hood, J.D. ’16, Columbia Law School Human Rights Clinic Gulika Reddy, LLM ’16, Columbia Law School Human Rights Clinic Lizzie O’Shea, LLM ’16, Columbia Law School Human Rights Clinic Candy Ofime, J.D. ’17, Columbia Law School Human Rights Clinic Su Anne Lee, LLM ’17, Columbia Law School Human Rights Clinic Doreen Ivy Bentum, J.D. ’18, Columbia Law School Human Rights Clinic Rachel LaFortune, J.D. ’18, Columbia Law School Human Rights Clinic iv Oyinkan Muraina, J.D. ’19, Columbia Law School Human Rights Clinic Kamilah Moore, J.D. ’19, Columbia Law School Human Rights Clinic Nia Morgan, J.D. ’19, Columbia Law School Human Rights Clinic Lara Wallis, LLM ’19, Columbia Law School Human Rights Clinic Laura O’Brien, LLM ’19, Columbia Law School Human Rights Clinic Tessa Baizer, J.D. ’20, Columbia Law School Human Rights Clinic Additional Acknowledgements The authors would additionally like to acknowledge and thank the following individuals who reviewed and commented upon earlier drafts of this report: Fola Adeleke, Clinical Advocacy Fellow, Harvard Law School International Human Rights Clinic Abigail Greg, MSc., Graduate Research Assistant, The Earth Institute Amanda Klasing, Senior Researcher, Women’s Rights Division, Human Rights Watch Margaret Satterthwaite, Faculty Director and Professor of Clinical Law, Center for Human Rights & Global Justice Inga Winkler, Lecturer in Human Rights, Institute for the Study of Human Rights, Columbia University The authors would also like to acknowledge the research and cite-checking assistance of the following individuals: Anna Clare Pogson, LLM ’16, Columbia Law School Jacob Bogart J.D. ‘18, Columbia Law School Laura Pond, J.D. ’18, Columbia Law School Sami Cleland, J.D. ’19, Columbia Law School Mari Zaldivar, J.D. ’19, Columbia Law School Daniel Greenfeld designed the cover. Emily McDuff designed and formatted the body of the report. This report does not represent the institutional views of Columbia Law School or Columbia University. Funding This project was funded by (a) Columbia Law School’s Human Rights Clinic, and (b) a Cross- Cutting Initiative grant from Columbia University’s Earth Institute from December 2013- December 2016. v Table of Contents About the Authors .............................................................................................................. iii Acknowledgements ............................................................................................................ iv Executive Summary .............................................................................................................. 1 Recommendations ............................................................................................................. 10 Methodology ...................................................................................................................... 19 Chapter I: Background: Water, Extractive Industries in Papua New Guinea, and Industrial Mining in Porgera ............................................................................................................... 28 Chapter II: Life Near a Mine: Social and Environmental Concerns .................................. 36 Chapter III: Legal Framework: The Right to Water and Interrelated Rights ..................... 44 Chapter IV: Water in Porgera: Findings from an Interdisciplinary Study .......................... 54 Part A: Analysis Of Water Sources In Porgera ....................................................... 56 Part B: Access To Information And Participation................................................... 91 Chapter V: Legal Analysis of the Realization of the Right to Water in Porgera ............... 110 Conclusion ...................................................................................................................... 118 Annex I ........................................................................................................................... 120 Annex II ........................................................................................................................... 127 Endnotes .......................................................................................................................... 138 vi EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Porgera gold mine in PNG . is a world-class gold mine project, with an annual gold production of 15 tonnes.1 – Zijin Mining Group, co-owner of Porgera Mine, 2015 With these assets, Barrick will have access to over 5,300 square kilometers of contiguous ground for exploration in one of the world’s most highly endowed, under-explored gold and copper regions, which is also home to the world-class Porgera mine. 2 – Barrick Gold Corporation, co-owner of Porgera Mine, 2007 People say it is a world-class mine, but the environment tells a different story. – Resident of Yarik Village, Porgera, January 5, 2015 Many indigenous residents of Porgera, Papua New Guinea express deep fear that their lands, water sources, and very bodies are being “poisoned” by the gold mine operating at the heart of their traditional lands. Upon entering the Porgera Valley, it is immediately apparent that industrial gold mining has brought profound physical changes to the landscape. The mine’s open pit has replaced an entire mountain. Fences topped with razor wire crisscross the land. Giant piles of waste rock create new, craggy terrain, across which the rumbling of trucks, helicopters, and dynamite blasts echo. An enormous “red river” of warm tailings waste flows out from the mine, charting a course through the valley until it meets with river systems downstream. A constant plume of white vapor wafts from a mill where gold is separated from rock, rising above local villages. Interspersed in this
Recommended publications
  • The Gold Panning Booklet
    GoldPanning A Guide to recreational goldpanning on the Kenai Peninsula, Chugach National Forest, Alaska GoldPANNING A guide to recreational gold panning on the Kenai Peninsula, Chugach National Forest, Alaska Written by Carol Huber Chugach national Forest, anchorage, alaska & Joseph Kurtak Bureau of Land Management, anchorage, alaska Technical assistance by nathan Rathbun Bureau of Land Management, anchorage, alaska (formerly with the U.S. Bureau of Mines) graphic design and editing by David L. allen & Charles Lindemuth Chugach national Forest, anchorage, alaska graphic art by Kathy Sarns Chugach national Forest, anchorage, alaska Contents Welcome . 2 gold – Significance and Use . 3 Kenai Peninsula Mining – a History . 5 Mining Right & guidelines . 7 geology of the northern Kenai Peninsula . 9 Equipment you will need . 10 For your safety . 10 Where to look for gold . 12 How to pan . 13 Kenai Peninsula gold panning areas . 16 map1: Panning sites on the Kenai Peninsula . 17 Bertha Creek panning area . 18 map 2: Bertha Creek . 19 Six Mile Creek panning area . 20 map 3: Sixmile Creek . 21 Resurrection Creek panning area . 22 map 4: Resurrection Creek . 23 Crescent Creek panning area . 24 map 5: Crescent Creek . 25 How much gold have you found? . 26 A glossary of mining terms . 27 Further Reading… . 28 More information… . 29 Welcome Striking it rich! Finding the mother lode! ‘Tis the stuff of miners’ dreams. Unlike professional gold seekers, recreational gold pan- ners benefit mostly from the adventure. The entire family can share in the fun of prospecting and gold panning. in this booklet, we explain basic gold panning techniques, how to find gold, discuss mining rights and guidelines, and identify areas available for recreational panning on the Chugach national Forest portion of alaska’s Kenai Peninsula.
    [Show full text]
  • Heart of Gold Lesson Plan Year 7
    Heart of Gold Lesson Plan Year 7 Lesson 1 Separation of Gold Curriculum Links: (ACSSU112) / Year 7 / Science / Science Understanding / Chemical Sciences (ACSSU222) / Year 7 / Science / Science Understanding / Earth and Space Sciences (ACSHE119) / Year 7 / Science / Science as a Human Endeavour / Nature and Development of Science (ACSHE121) / Year 7 / Science / Science as a Human Endeavour / Use and Influence of Science Background Information: It is actually quite unusual to find large nuggets of gold and most gold prospectors actually need to separate gold out from lots of other material. Depending on where the gold is found, this may be done by panning or through dry blowing. Each of these methods relies on the property of density. As gold has a very high density compared to the rock, soil and sediments it is contained in, it can be separated out by exploiting this property as it will fall to the bottom of mixtures that are allowed to settle out. The process of panning is used when small pieces of gold are found in creeks and rivers. It involves using a large shallow dish (pan) to scoop out some of the sediments in the riverbed and a small amount of water. You use a swirling motion with the pan tipped away from you and allow small amounts of the sediments and water to spill over the edge of the pan. When you have only a small amount of the sediments remaining in the pan, you will be able to see any gold particles that remain at the bottom of the pan. During the West Australian gold rush, most of the gold was being found in dry areas and water was a scarce commodity.
    [Show full text]
  • Delivering Value…Value… Fromfrom Assets,Assets, Peoplepeople && Projectsprojects
    BARRICK GOLD CORPORATION Scotia Capital Gold Conference Toronto – November 29, 2005 DeliveringDelivering Value…Value… FromFrom Assets,Assets, PeoplePeople && ProjectsProjects November 29, 2005 1 Important Information FORWARD LOOKING STATEMENTS Certain information included in this presentation, including any information as to our future financial or operating performance and other statements that express management's expectations or estimates of future performance, constitute "forward-looking statements." The words "expect", "will", “intend”, “estimate” and similar expressions identify forward-looking statements. Forward-looking statements are necessarily based upon a number of estimates and assumptions that, while considered reasonable by management are inherently subject to significant business, economic and competitive uncertainties and contingencies. The Company cautions the reader that such forward- looking statements involve known and unknown risks, uncertainties and other factors that may cause the actual financial results, performance or achievements of Barrick to be materially different from the Company's estimated future results, performance or achievements expressed or implied by those forward-looking statements and the forward-looking statements are not guarantees of future performance. These risks, uncertainties and other factors include, but are not limited to: changes in the worldwide price of gold or certain other commodities (such as fuel and electricity) and currencies; ability to successfully integrate acquired assets; legislative, political or economic developments in the jurisdictions in which the Company carries on business; operating or technical difficulties in connection with mining or development activities; the speculative nature of gold exploration and development, including the risks of diminishing quantities or grades of reserves; and the risks involved in the exploration, development and mining business.
    [Show full text]
  • Proyecto Megaminero PASCUA LAMA: El Agua Como Origen De La Vida
    Proyecto Megaminero PASCUA LAMA: El agua como origen de la vida. “El agua es el elemento y principio de las cosas” Tales de Mileto (624 AC-546 AC. Filósofo y matemático griego) Alexis E. Aranciva Reg. 16547 DNI 31728810 “Cátedra Virtual para la Integración Latinoamericana” Introducción Se intentará elaborar un informe que aborde las características del proyecto binacional de explotación minera denominado “Pascua Lama” y sus consecuencias para la calidad de vida de los pobladores a un lado y otro de la Cordillera de Los Andes. El principal recurso afectado por y para la explotación minera es el agua, puesto que la minería demanda enormes cantidades de agua, y contamina las cuencas hídricas con metales pesados y sustancias químicas como el cianuro, entre otros. Considerando que el agua es el origen de todo tipo de vida en nuestro planeta y que es considerado un recurso escaso, lo que se intentará demostrar en este trabajo es la inviabilidad de los explotación minera a cielo abierto, que requiere grandes cantidades de este recurso tan valioso para el desarrollo y la supervivencia del ser humano como tal. Fundamentación Minería y Contaminación: Daño a los Ecosistemas La minería es una industria altamente contaminante, afecta de manera directa al agua, suelo y aire, lo que se traduce con el tiempo en efectos sobre las personas, animales, plantas etc. es decir afectan a los ecosistemas con las implicaciones ambientales de la actividad minera. La pregunta es ¿Cómo la minería genera contaminación? y ¿Cuáles son los efectos adversos asociados a la actividad minera? La actividad minera contamina, en primer lugar el agua, ya que para poder separar los metales de la roca necesita utilizar agua en grandes cantidades, agua que luego del proceso productivo se encuentra contaminada con elementos como cianuro y metales pesados tales como cadmio, cobre, arsénico, plomo, mercurio, hierro etc.
    [Show full text]
  • S Ndlovu (PDF)
    Extraction of Gold Then, Now and the Future Prof Sehliselo Ndlovu DST/NRF SARChI: Hydrometallurgy and Sustainable Development University of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg Building a Robust Minerals Industry 3 – 4 July 2017, Cresta Lodge, Harare University of the Witwatersrand Johannesburg Founded Oct. 1896: School of Mines Approx. 37 000 Students 5 Faculties, 33 Schools, 3610 Courses >160 000 Degrees Conferred since 1922 55% Female Students 10 National Centres of Excellence Home to the Bidvest Football Club( Current PSL league Champions) Evolution in Gold Processing Past Technologies • Amalgamation • Panning Current Technologies • Cyanide leaching • Processing of Emerging and Future refractory ores Technologies • Bio-oxidation • Ionic liquids • Alternative leaching • Ultrasonic leaching reagents • Corn starch?? Past Technologies Used in Ancient Times History of gold extends back at least 6,000 years. Egypt and Mesopotamia around 4000 BC. Gravity Separation: Gold Panning Gold concentrated by washing lighter river sands with water Leaves dense gold particles Alternative- wash gold-bearing sand and gravel over a woollen fleece Traps heavier gold dust that would sink into the wool fibres. Advantages • Simplicity Disadvantages • Labour intensive Gravity Separation: Sluicing • Water is channelled to flow through a sluice-box. • Sluice-box is essentially a man-made channel with riffles (barriers) at the bottom. • Riffles create dead-zones in the water current which allows gold to drop out of suspension. Sluicing and panning results in the direct recovery of small gold nuggets and flakes. Gold Parting: Salt Cementation Process • Invented to remove Ag from Au-Ag mixtures around 6th century BC. Mix: argentiferous gold foil, common salt, brick dust or burnt clay and urine in a sealed container.
    [Show full text]
  • A Review of the Current State of Research on the Water, Energy, and Food Nexus
    A Review of the Current State of Research on the Water, Energy, and Food Nexus by Aiko Endo, Izumi Tsurita, Kimberly Burnett, And Pedcris M. Orencio Working Paper No. 2016-7 May 23, 2016 UNIVERSITY OF HAWAI‘I AT MANOA 2424 MAILE WAY, ROOM 540 • HONOLULU, HAWAI‘I 96822 WWW.UHERO.HAWAII.EDU WORKING PAPERS ARE PRELIMINARY MATERIALS CIRCULATED TO STIMULATE DISCUSSION AND CRITICAL COMMENT. THE VIEWS EXPRESSED ARE THOSE OF THE INDIVIDUAL AUTHORS. A Review of the Current State of Research on the Water, Energy, and Food Nexus Aiko Endo 1*, Izumi Tsurita2, Kimberly Burnett3, Pedcris M. Orencio4 1Research Department, Research Institute for Humanity and Nature, 457-4 Kamigamo-motoyama, Kita-ku, Kyoto 603-8047, Japan 2Department of Cultural Anthropology, Graduate School of Arts and Sciences, The University of Tokyo, 3-8-1 Komaba, Meguro-ku, Tokyo, 153-8902, Japan 3 University of Hawaii Economic Research Organization, University of Hawaii at Manoa, 2424 Maile Way Saunders Hall 540 Honolulu, Hawaii, 96822, U.S.A. 4 Catholic Relief Service Philippines (Manila Office) Urban Disaster Risk Reduction Department, CBCP Building 470 Gen Luna Street, Intramuros, 1002 Manila, Philippines *Author to whom correspondence may be addressed. Tel: +81-75-707-2477; Fax: +81-75-707-2509. [email protected] Abstract: 1. Study region Asia, Europe, Oceania, North America, South America, Middle East and Africa. 2. Study focus The purpose of this paper is to review and analyze the water, energy, and food nexus and regions of study, nexus keywords and stakeholders in order to understand the current state of nexus research.
    [Show full text]
  • Public Comments
    Revised Willamette Mercury TMDL and Water Quality Management Plan Public Comments Watershed Management 700 NE Multnomah St. Suite 600 Portland, OR 97232 Phone: 503-229-5696 800-452-4011 www.oregon.gov/DEQ DEQ is a leader in restoring, maintaining and enhancing the quality of Oregon’s air, land and water. State of Oregon Department of Environmental Quality 1 This report prepared by: Oregon Department of Environmental Quality 700 NE Multnomah Street, Suite 600 Portland, OR 97232 1-800-452-4011 www.oregon.gov/deq Contact: Kevin Brannan Alex Liverman Andrea Matzke Priscilla Woolverton 503-229-6629 503-229-5080 503-229-5350 541-687-7347 DEQ can provide documents in an alternate format or in a language other than English upon request. Call DEQ at 800-452-4011 or email [email protected]. Table of Contents Introduction ................................................................................................................................................. 1 Comments .................................................................................................................................................... 1 1. Steven Wright, Texas ................................................................................................................... 1 2. Craig & Linda Olson, Oregon ...................................................................................................... 1 3. Tom Quintal, Oregon .................................................................................................................... 6 4. Craig
    [Show full text]
  • Abuse by Barrick Gold Corporation Barrick's Porgera Gold Mine
    FACTSHEET: Abuse by Barrick Gold Corporation Representing survivors of gang rape and those killed by Barrick Gold Corporation’s security guards at the Porgera gold mine in Papua New Guinea Canadian mining company Barrick Gold Corporation, the largest gold mining company in the world, operates the Porgera mine in Papua New Guinea (PNG), where security guards have raped and gang-raped hundreds of local women and girls and killed several local men. EarthRights International (ERI) represents a number of survivors of rape and family members whose relatives were killed by Barrick security guards. Barrick’s Porgera Gold Mine Barrick has owned and operated the Porgera gold mine since 2006, when it acquired the previous owner, Placer Dome. Barrick also acquired a legacy of environmental damage and human rights abuses that it has failed to remedy. Each day, Barrick dumps more than 16,000 tons of waste into the Porgera River and local creeks that villagers have long relied upon for drinking water, bathing, and washing clothes and food. The mine’s ever-expanding waste dumps continue to take over the land and bury the homes of the original landowners that have lived in the region for generations, long before large-scale mining came to Porgera. Surrounded on all sides, villagers have no choice but to cross the dangerous dumps to reach agricultural land, commercial areas, schools or other villages. Many have not been compensated for the loss of their land and their homes, and Barrick has refused to relocate them. Without land to farm and sources of clean water, practically the only means of income available to some of the local indigenous communities is to scavenge for remnants of gold in the open pit or the treacherous waste dumps.
    [Show full text]
  • Annual Information Form for the Year Ended December 31, 2018 Dated As of March 22, 2019 BARRICK GOLD CORPORATION
    Barrick Gold Corporation Brookfield Place, TD Canada Trust Tower Suite 3700, 161 Bay Street, P.O. Box 212 Toronto, ON M5J 2S1 Annual Information Form For the year ended December 31, 2018 Dated as of March 22, 2019 BARRICK GOLD CORPORATION ANNUAL INFORMATION FORM TABLE OF CONTENTS GLOSSARY OF TECHNICAL AND BUSINESS TERMS 4 REPORTING CURRENCY, FINANCIAL AND RESERVE INFORMATION 10 FORWARD-LOOKING INFORMATION 11 SCIENTIFIC AND TECHNICAL INFORMATION 14 THIRD PARTY DATA 15 GENERAL INFORMATION 15 Organizational Structure 15 Subsidiaries 16 Areas of Interest 18 General Development of the Business 18 History 18 Significant Acquisitions 18 Strategy 19 Recent Developments 21 Results of Operations in 2018 22 NARRATIVE DESCRIPTION OF THE BUSINESS 26 Production and Guidance 26 Reportable Operating Segments 26 Barrick Nevada 27 Pueblo Viejo (60% basis) 28 Lagunas Norte 29 Veladero (50% basis) 29 Turquoise Ridge (75% basis) 30 Acacia Mining plc (63.9% basis) 31 Pascua-Lama Project 32 Mineral Reserves and Mineral Resources 33 Marketing and Distribution 46 Employees and Labor Relations 47 Competition 48 Sustainability 48 Operations in Emerging Markets: Corporate Governance and Internal Controls 49 Board and Management Experience and Oversight 50 Communications 51 - i - Internal Controls and Cash Management Practices 51 Managing Cultural Differences 52 Books and Records 52 MATERIAL PROPERTIES 52 Cortez Property 52 Goldstrike Property 58 Turquoise Ridge Mine 63 Pueblo Viejo Mine 69 Veladero Mine 76 Kibali Mine 86 Loulo-Gounkoto Mine Complex 93 EXPLORATION
    [Show full text]
  • Golden Rules Making the Case for Responsible Mining
    GOLDEN RULES Making the case for responsible mining A REPORT BY EARTHWORKS AND OXFAM AMERICA Contents Introduction: The Golden Rules 2 Grasberg Mine, Indonesia 5 Yanacocha Mine, Peru, and Cortez Mine, Nevada 7 BHP Billiton Iron Ore Mines, Australia 9 Hemlo Camp Mines, Canada 10 Mongbwalu Mine, the Democratic Republic of Congo 13 Rosia Montana Mine, Romania 15 Marcopper Mine, the Philippines, and Minahasa Raya and Batu Hijau Mines, Indonesia 17 Porgera Gold Mine, Papua New Guinea 18 Junín Mine, Ecuador 21 Akyem Mine, Ghana 22 Pebble Mine, Alaska 23 Zortman-Landusky Mine, Montana 25 Bogoso/Prestea Mine, Ghana 26 Jerritt Canyon Mine, Nevada 27 Summitville Mine, Colorado 29 Following the rules: An agenda for action 30 Notes 31 Cover: Sadiola Gold Mine, Mali | Brett Eloff/Oxfam America Copyright © EARTHWORKS, Oxfam America, 2007. Reproduction is permitted for educational or noncommercial purposes, provided credit is given to EARTHWORKS and Oxfam America. Around the world, large-scale metals mining takes an enormous toll on the health of the environment and communities. Gold mining, in particular, is one of the dirtiest industries in the world. Massive open-pit mines, some measuring as much as two miles (3.2 kilometers) across, generate staggering quantities of waste—an average of 76 tons for every ounce of gold.1 In the US, metals mining is the leading contributor of toxic emissions to the environment.2 And in countries such as Ghana, Romania, and the Philippines, mining has also been associated with human rights violations, the displacement of people from their homes, and the disruption of traditional livelihoods.
    [Show full text]
  • A Group of Coins Struck in Roman Britain
    A group of coins struck in Roman Britain 1001 Antoninus Pius (AD.138-161), Æ as, believed to be struck at a British travelling mint, laur. bust r., rev. BRITANNIA COS III S C, Britannia seated on rock in an attitude of sadness, wt. 12.68gms. (Sp. COE no 646; RIC.934), patinated, almost extremely fine, an exceptional example of this very poor issue £800-1000 This was struck to commemorate the quashing of a northern uprising in AD.154-5 when the Antonine wall was evacuated after its construction. This issue, always poorly struck and on a small flan, is believed to have been struck with the legions. 1002 Carausius, usurper in Britain (AD.287-296), Æ antoninianus, C mint, IMP C CARAVSIVS PF AVG, radiate dr. bust r., rev. VIRTVS AVG, Mars stg. l. with reversed spear and shield, S in field,in ex. C, wt. 4.63gms. (RIC.-), well struck with some original silvering, dark patina, extremely fine, an exceptional example, probably unique £600-800 An unpublished reverse variety depicting Mars with these attributes and position. Recorded at the British Museum. 1003 Carausius, usurper in Britain (AD.287-296), Æ antoninianus, London mint, VIRTVS CARAVSI AVG, radiate and cuir. bust l., holding shield and spear, rev. PAX AVG, Pax stg. l., FO in field, in ex. ML, wt. 4.14gms. (RIC.116), dark patina, well struck with a superb military-style bust, extremely fine and very rare thus, an exceptional example £1200-1500 1004 Diocletian, struck by Carausius, usurper in Britain (AD.287-296), Æ antoninianus, C mint, IMP C DIOCLETIANVS AVG, radiate cuir.
    [Show full text]
  • Columbia University Task Force on Climate: Report
    COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY TASK FORCE ON CLIMATE: REPORT Delivered to President Bollinger December 1, 2019 UNIVERSITY TASK FORCE ON CLIMATE FALL 2019 Contents Preface—University Task Force Process of Engagement ....................................................................................................................... 3 Executive Summary: Principles of a Climate School .............................................................................................................................. 4 Introduction: The Climate Challenge ..................................................................................................................................................... 6 The Columbia University Response ....................................................................................................................................................... 7 Columbia’s Strengths ........................................................................................................................................................................ 7 Columbia’s Limitations ...................................................................................................................................................................... 8 Why a School? ................................................................................................................................................................................... 9 A Columbia Climate School .................................................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]