Public Comments

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Public Comments Revised Willamette Mercury TMDL and Water Quality Management Plan Public Comments Watershed Management 700 NE Multnomah St. Suite 600 Portland, OR 97232 Phone: 503-229-5696 800-452-4011 www.oregon.gov/DEQ DEQ is a leader in restoring, maintaining and enhancing the quality of Oregon’s air, land and water. State of Oregon Department of Environmental Quality 1 This report prepared by: Oregon Department of Environmental Quality 700 NE Multnomah Street, Suite 600 Portland, OR 97232 1-800-452-4011 www.oregon.gov/deq Contact: Kevin Brannan Alex Liverman Andrea Matzke Priscilla Woolverton 503-229-6629 503-229-5080 503-229-5350 541-687-7347 DEQ can provide documents in an alternate format or in a language other than English upon request. Call DEQ at 800-452-4011 or email [email protected]. Table of Contents Introduction ................................................................................................................................................. 1 Comments .................................................................................................................................................... 1 1. Steven Wright, Texas ................................................................................................................... 1 2. Craig & Linda Olson, Oregon ...................................................................................................... 1 3. Tom Quintal, Oregon .................................................................................................................... 6 4. Craig & Linda Olson, Oregon ...................................................................................................... 9 5. Craig & Linda Olson, Oregon ...................................................................................................... 9 6. M. James Fox, Cresswell Water Control District, seat 2, Oregon .............................................. 13 7. Terrie Anicker, Northwest Mineral Prospecting Club, WA ....................................................... 15 8. Craig Olson, Oregon .................................................................................................................. 15 9. Clark Niewendorp, Northwest Mineral Prospecting Club .......................................................... 16 10. Dennis Hebard, Bohemia Mine Owners Association, Oregon ................................................... 17 11. John Becker, Northwest Mineral Prospecting Club .................................................................... 17 12. Dick Secord, Bohemia Mine Owners Association, Oregon ....................................................... 18 13. Tasha Webb, Bohemia Mine Owners Association, Oregon ....................................................... 18 14. Ron Anicker, Northwest Mineral Prospecting Club ................................................................... 19 15. John Gilbert, Bohemia Mine Owners Association, Oregon ....................................................... 19 16. Robert Rasey, Northwest Mineral Prospecting Club .................................................................. 21 17. Tom Pepiot, Bohemia Mine Owners Association, Oregon ........................................................ 22 18. Scott Atkinson, Northwest Mineral Prospecting Club, WA ....................................................... 23 19. Tom Quintel, Oregon .................................................................................................................. 25 20. Linda Olson, Oregon .................................................................................................................. 26 21. McKenzie Dukes ........................................................................................................................ 28 22. John Stepnik, Willamette Valley Miners, Oregon ...................................................................... 29 23. Howard Connor, Willamette Valley Miners, Oregon ................................................................. 29 24. Cheryl Greenlee, Oregon ............................................................................................................ 31 25. Various Commenters, Oregon .................................................................................................... 31 26. Stephen Roberts, Washington County Department of Land Use & Transportation, Oregon ..... 32 27. Tom Pepiot, President of the Bohemia Mine Owners Association, Oregon .............................. 37 28. Jeff Hays ..................................................................................................................................... 41 29. Richard Stocking, Oregon .......................................................................................................... 41 30. Michael Karnosh, The Confederated Tribes of the Grand Ronde Community of Oregon ......... 42 31. Jamie ........................................................................................................................................... 45 32. Charles R. Knoll, Linn County Road Department, Oregon ........................................................ 46 33. Brian Nicholas, Marion County Public Works, Oregon ............................................................ 55 34. Michael Jordan, Bureau of Environmental Services, City of Portland, Oregon ......................... 57 35. Jeff Warren ................................................................................................................................. 63 36. Dan O’Brien, Greenberry Irrigation District, Oregon ............................................................... 63 37. Odessa Smeltzer ......................................................................................................................... 67 38. Tom Quintal, Willamette Valley Miners Association ............................................................... 69 39. Tasha Lee Webb, Oregon .......................................................................................................... 70 40. Gary Stockhoff, Benton County, Oregon ................................................................................... 73 41. Jim James, Oregon Small Woodlands Association, Oregon ..................................................... 74 42. Therese Walch, City of Eugene, Oregon ................................................................................... 76 43. Blake Rowe, Oregon Wheat Growers League, Oregon .............................................................. 77 44. Richard and Laura Secord ......................................................................................................... 79 45. Michael Eliason, Association of Oregon Counties, Oregon ...................................................... 80 46. Paul Kirsch, G.A. Miller Drainage District, Oregon .................................................................. 83 47. Clark Niewendorp, Oregon ........................................................................................................ 85 48. Robert P. Baumgartner, Clean Water Services, Oregon ........................................................... 100 49. Vivian Christensen, Oregon...................................................................................................... 106 50. Sam Sweeney, Oregon .............................................................................................................. 106 51. Dave Bielenberg, East Valley Water District, Oregon ............................................................. 107 52. Jayne Carlin, EPA ..................................................................................................................... 109 53. Sidney Mulder, Polk County, Oregon ...................................................................................... 110 54. Kyle Abraham, Oregon Department of Forestry, Oregon ....................................................... 112 55. Greg Geist, Clackamas County and Water Environment Services, Oregon ............................. 119 56. Lee Folliard, Oregon/Washington Bureau of Land Management, Oregon ............................. 128 57. Karen Darnell , StreamSavers................................................................................................... 130 58. Meredith Nagely, Associated Oregon Hazelnut Industries, Oregon......................................... 131 59. Susan Smith, Oregon Association of Clean Water Agencies (ACWA), Oregon ..................... 133 60. Dave Dillon, Oregon Farm Bureau, Oregon Forest & Industries, Oregon Asso. of Nurseries 142 61. Mike Russell, Columbia County, Oregon ................................................................................ 151 62. Jared Rubin, Eugene Water & Electric Board, Oregon ............................................................ 153 63. Katie Fast, Oregonians for Food & Shelter (OFS), Oregon Cattlemen’s Association, Oregon 155 64. Mike Powers, Oregon Department of Agriculture, Oregon ...................................................... 157 65. Keri Morin Handaly, City of Gresham, Oregon ...................................................................... 162 66. Dennis Hebard, Oregon ........................................................................................................... 166 67. Jodi Hack, Oregon Home Builders Association, Oregon ......................................................... 169 68. David Mabe, Bureau of Reclamation, Pacific Northwest Region, Oregon .............................
Recommended publications
  • The Gold Panning Booklet
    GoldPanning A Guide to recreational goldpanning on the Kenai Peninsula, Chugach National Forest, Alaska GoldPANNING A guide to recreational gold panning on the Kenai Peninsula, Chugach National Forest, Alaska Written by Carol Huber Chugach national Forest, anchorage, alaska & Joseph Kurtak Bureau of Land Management, anchorage, alaska Technical assistance by nathan Rathbun Bureau of Land Management, anchorage, alaska (formerly with the U.S. Bureau of Mines) graphic design and editing by David L. allen & Charles Lindemuth Chugach national Forest, anchorage, alaska graphic art by Kathy Sarns Chugach national Forest, anchorage, alaska Contents Welcome . 2 gold – Significance and Use . 3 Kenai Peninsula Mining – a History . 5 Mining Right & guidelines . 7 geology of the northern Kenai Peninsula . 9 Equipment you will need . 10 For your safety . 10 Where to look for gold . 12 How to pan . 13 Kenai Peninsula gold panning areas . 16 map1: Panning sites on the Kenai Peninsula . 17 Bertha Creek panning area . 18 map 2: Bertha Creek . 19 Six Mile Creek panning area . 20 map 3: Sixmile Creek . 21 Resurrection Creek panning area . 22 map 4: Resurrection Creek . 23 Crescent Creek panning area . 24 map 5: Crescent Creek . 25 How much gold have you found? . 26 A glossary of mining terms . 27 Further Reading… . 28 More information… . 29 Welcome Striking it rich! Finding the mother lode! ‘Tis the stuff of miners’ dreams. Unlike professional gold seekers, recreational gold pan- ners benefit mostly from the adventure. The entire family can share in the fun of prospecting and gold panning. in this booklet, we explain basic gold panning techniques, how to find gold, discuss mining rights and guidelines, and identify areas available for recreational panning on the Chugach national Forest portion of alaska’s Kenai Peninsula.
    [Show full text]
  • Heart of Gold Lesson Plan Year 7
    Heart of Gold Lesson Plan Year 7 Lesson 1 Separation of Gold Curriculum Links: (ACSSU112) / Year 7 / Science / Science Understanding / Chemical Sciences (ACSSU222) / Year 7 / Science / Science Understanding / Earth and Space Sciences (ACSHE119) / Year 7 / Science / Science as a Human Endeavour / Nature and Development of Science (ACSHE121) / Year 7 / Science / Science as a Human Endeavour / Use and Influence of Science Background Information: It is actually quite unusual to find large nuggets of gold and most gold prospectors actually need to separate gold out from lots of other material. Depending on where the gold is found, this may be done by panning or through dry blowing. Each of these methods relies on the property of density. As gold has a very high density compared to the rock, soil and sediments it is contained in, it can be separated out by exploiting this property as it will fall to the bottom of mixtures that are allowed to settle out. The process of panning is used when small pieces of gold are found in creeks and rivers. It involves using a large shallow dish (pan) to scoop out some of the sediments in the riverbed and a small amount of water. You use a swirling motion with the pan tipped away from you and allow small amounts of the sediments and water to spill over the edge of the pan. When you have only a small amount of the sediments remaining in the pan, you will be able to see any gold particles that remain at the bottom of the pan. During the West Australian gold rush, most of the gold was being found in dry areas and water was a scarce commodity.
    [Show full text]
  • S Ndlovu (PDF)
    Extraction of Gold Then, Now and the Future Prof Sehliselo Ndlovu DST/NRF SARChI: Hydrometallurgy and Sustainable Development University of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg Building a Robust Minerals Industry 3 – 4 July 2017, Cresta Lodge, Harare University of the Witwatersrand Johannesburg Founded Oct. 1896: School of Mines Approx. 37 000 Students 5 Faculties, 33 Schools, 3610 Courses >160 000 Degrees Conferred since 1922 55% Female Students 10 National Centres of Excellence Home to the Bidvest Football Club( Current PSL league Champions) Evolution in Gold Processing Past Technologies • Amalgamation • Panning Current Technologies • Cyanide leaching • Processing of Emerging and Future refractory ores Technologies • Bio-oxidation • Ionic liquids • Alternative leaching • Ultrasonic leaching reagents • Corn starch?? Past Technologies Used in Ancient Times History of gold extends back at least 6,000 years. Egypt and Mesopotamia around 4000 BC. Gravity Separation: Gold Panning Gold concentrated by washing lighter river sands with water Leaves dense gold particles Alternative- wash gold-bearing sand and gravel over a woollen fleece Traps heavier gold dust that would sink into the wool fibres. Advantages • Simplicity Disadvantages • Labour intensive Gravity Separation: Sluicing • Water is channelled to flow through a sluice-box. • Sluice-box is essentially a man-made channel with riffles (barriers) at the bottom. • Riffles create dead-zones in the water current which allows gold to drop out of suspension. Sluicing and panning results in the direct recovery of small gold nuggets and flakes. Gold Parting: Salt Cementation Process • Invented to remove Ag from Au-Ag mixtures around 6th century BC. Mix: argentiferous gold foil, common salt, brick dust or burnt clay and urine in a sealed container.
    [Show full text]
  • The Pharaohs' Gold: Ancient Egyptian Metallurgy
    THE PHARAOHS' GOLD: ANCIENT EGYPTIAN METALLURGY TI n an age when mining is conducted on an lode country increased in size and scale, the clam­ industrial scale through the use of explosives, or for more efficient means of processing ores huge draglines, and enormous ore-carriers, there grew ever more strident and in response to this is a tendency to forget that mining was, and is, an demand milling processes grew increasingly activity involving the concerted efforts of human sophisticated. Greever notes that California's beings. In his depiction of mining activities in hardrock miners first relied on arrastras and California's nineteenth-century gold fields, Chilean mills to reduce their ores. When these William S. Greever in The Bonanza West: The Story devices failed to provide satisfactory returns of the Western Mining Frontier, 1848-1900 calls to California's argonauts then began to employ mind the human factor involved in the extraction stamp mills to process their gold ores.3 of ore from beneath the earth's surface: The processes underlying the operation of a stamp mill had changed little in the centuries [T)he deepest shafts in California leading up to the California gold rush.4 Greever quartz mining went down ... about compares the basic function of a stamp to that of a three hundred feet; often a deposit was pharmacist's mortar and pestle. In its simplest worked by a tunnel into a hillside or application, a stamp was dropped repeatedly on a even an open cut. The men used hand piece of metallic ore until the ore was reduced to drills, sledges, and a little black pow­ powder.
    [Show full text]
  • Upper Willamette WQ Monitoring
    Water Quality Results for the Middle and Coast Fork Willamette Watersheds and Eight Small Cities in the Upper Willamette Sub-basin: 2008- 2010 [Type text] Water Quality Results for the Middle and Coast Fork Willamette Watersheds and Eight Small Cities in the Upper Willamette Sub-basin: 2008- 2010 Prepared by Middle Fork Willamette Watershed Council Coast Fork Willamette Watershed Council Long Tom Watershed Council Aryana Ferguson, Madrona Consulting With support from Oregon Department of Environmental Quality Junction City Public Works Springfield Utility Board July 2011 [Type text] Table of Contents Acknowledgements ....................................................................................................................... 1 Executive Summary ...................................................................................................................... 2 Upper Middle Fork Willamette Watershed ............................................................................. 2 Lower Middle Fork Willamette Watershed ............................................................................. 3 Coast Fork Willamette Watershed ......................................................................................... 3 Long Tom Watershed ............................................................................................................ 4 Introduction ................................................................................................................................... 5 Chapter 1: ....................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • The Automobile Gold Rush in 1930S Arizona
    Chapter 10 THE AUTOMOBILE GOLD RUSH IN 1930S ARIZONA ©1998 Charles Wallace Miller Today the foremost image of the 1930s that remains years m such manner that the most appropriate in our national consciousness is undoubtedly the name is unquestionably "The Automobile Gold "down and out" lifestyle. Even those far too young Rush," while many participants can only be to remember the times have this image from school described as "amateurs." California naturally led textbooks, from documentary films patched from the movement, yet Arizona saw similar activity old newsreels, and from stories of grandparents. through much of its extent. Scenes of bread lines, of makeshift shanty towns called "Hoovervilles," of "Okies" crossing the By August of 1930 an even more significant news country in broken down trucks, symbolize the era. story appeared which was indicative of the early stages of the overall movement. Near Globe, Surprisingly, many individuals who might have oth­ Arizona, a local youth, Jess Wolf, recovered erwise been in similar circumstances found a nom­ nuggets in a gulch. He exhibited his find, totalling inal job and a place to live through mining. The two ounces, in the town of Globe where copper smallest operations accounted for less than 3% of miners were just then being discharged by the total gold production. Nevertheless, they certainly major mining firms. A local rush ensued. enhanced the psychological state of their workers Significantly, Jess Wolf was age seven, and did not who could feel much more productive than many use any equipment at all. The story went out on other victims of the Depression.
    [Show full text]
  • Implications for the Calapooya Divide, Oregon
    AN ABSTRACT OF THE THESIS OF Karen Joyce Starr for the degree of Master of Arts in Interdiscinlinary Studies in Anthr000loay. Geogranhv, and _Agricultural and Resource Economics presented on October 1, 1982 Title: THE CULTURAL SIGNIFICANCE OF MOUNTAIN REGIONS; IMPLICATIONS FOR THE QALAPOOYA DIVIDE. OREGON Abstract approved: Redacted for Privacy Thomas C. Hogg Altitudinal variations in upland regions of the earthcreate variable climatic zones and conditions. Plant andanimal communities must adapt to these conditions, andwhen theyreach their tolerance limits for environmental conditions at the upper levels of a zone, they cease to exist inthe environment. Humans also utilize mountains for a variety of reasons. The cultural traits which result from the adaptationof groups of people to mountainenvironments are unique from those of the surrounding lowlanders. Adaptation to upland areas is most often expressed in a transhumant or agro-pastoral lifestyle attuned to the climatic variations and demands of the mountain environment. This distribution of cultural traits suggests thatmountains are considered unique culture areas, apart from but sharing sometraits in common with neighboring lowland areas. The Cultural Significance of Mountain Regions Implications for the Calapooya Divide, Oregon by Karen Joyce Starr A THESIS submitted to Oregon State University in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Arts in Interdisciplinary Studies Completed October 1, 1982 Commencement June 1983 APPROVED: Redacted for Privacy Professor of Anthropology in charge of major Redacted for Privacy Chairman of Department of Anthropology Redacted for Privacy AssociateiDrofssor of Geography in charge of minor Redacted for Privacy Profe4or of Agricultural and Resource Economics in charge of minor Redacted for Privacy Dean of Graduat chool Date thesis is presented October 1.
    [Show full text]
  • Coast Fork Willamette Action Plan 2019-2029
    Coast Fork Willamette Watershed Strategic Action Plan – Jan 2019 Coast Fork Willamette Watershed Strategic Action Plan – Jan 2019 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS The Coast Fork Willamette Watershed Council thanks the many individuals and organizations who helped prepare this action plan. Partner organizations that contributed include U.S. Forest Service, City of Cottage Grove, City of Crewswell, Oregon Department of Fish and Wildlife, Bureau of Land Management, U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, McKenzie River Trust, and Weyerhaeuser Company. Plan Development Team Michael DeHart, City of Creswell Krista Farris, Cottage Grove River Ranger District, U.S. Forest Service Amanda Gilbert, Coast Fork Willamette Watershed Council Reilly Newman, Coast Fork Willamette Watershed Council Amada Ferguson, City of Cottage Grove Technical Advisory Group Steve Leibhart, Bureau of Land Management – Eugene/Salem District Krista Farris, Cottage Grove Ranger District, U.S. Forest Service Cameron Mitchell, Cottage Grove Ranger District, U.S. Forest Service Doug Garletts, U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Christer Lebreque, McKenzie River Trust Daniel Dietz, McKenzie River Trust Meghan Tuttle, Weyerhaeuser Company Katherine Nordholm, Springfield Office, Oregon Department of Fish and Wildlife Wes Messinger, U.S. Army Corps of Engineers i Coast Fork Willamette Watershed Strategic Action Plan – Jan 2019 Table of Contents EXECUTIVE SUMMARY .................................................................................................................... 1 1 INTRODUCTION ........................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Geology of the Central and Northern Parts of the Western Cascade Range in Oregon
    Geology of the Central and Northern Parts of the Western Cascade Range in Oregon GEOLOGICAL SURVEY PROFESSIONAL PAPER 449 Prepared in cooperation with the State of Oregon, Departtnent of Geology and Mineral Industries Geology of the Central and Northern Parts of the Western Cascade Range in Oregon By DALLAS L. PECK, ALLAN B. GRIGGS, HERBERT G: SCHLICKER, FRANCIS G. WELLS, and HOLLIS M. DOLE ·~ GEOLOGICAL SURVEY PROFESSIONAL PAPER 449 Prepared in cooperation with the State of Oregon, Department of Geology and Mineral Industries ,... UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE, WASHINGTON : 1964 UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR STEWART L. UDALL, Secretary GEOLOGICAL SURVEY Thomas B. Nolan, Director . -~ The U.S. Geological Survey Library catalog card for this publication appears after page 56. For sale by the Superintendent of Documents,. U.S. Government Printing Office · · ·. Washington, D.C. 20402 CONTENTS Page Page Stratigraphy-Continued 1 Abstract------------------------------------------- Sardine Formation-Continued Introduction ______ --------------------------------- 2 Lithology and petrography-Continued Scope of investigation ______ - ___ - __ -------------- 2 Location, accessibility, and culture __ -------------- 2 Pyroclastic rocks __________ -- __ ---------'-- 33 Physical features ______ --_---_-_- ___ -----_------- 3 Age and correlation ____ - _--- __ -------------- 34 Climate and vegetation ___ --- ___ - ___ -----_------- 4 Troutdale Formation _____ ------------------------ 35 Fieldwork and reliability of the geologic
    [Show full text]
  • Eastern Lane Maps Western Lane Maps
    Eastern Lane Maps Junction City Map 01 Junction City Map 02 Map 03 Map 04 Map 04 Map 06 Map 05 Map 05 Coburg Coburg Map 07 Map 08 Map 09 Veneta Eugene Map 10 Map 11 Eugene Springfield Map 12 Map 13 Map 14 Springfield Map 14 Map 15 Florence Map 16 Map 17 Creswell Dunes City Lowell Creswell Map 18 Map 19 Map 19 Map 20 Cottage Grove Cottage Grove Map 21 Westfir Oakridge Western Lane Maps Map 22 Map 22 Map 23 Map 24 Map 24 Goodman Lake Hulbert Lake Hult Log Storage Reservoir Neil Lake Deer Creek Love Lake Bear Creek Map 01 Map 02 Junction City Map 03 Long Tom River Tenas Lakes Hand Lake Map 04 Amazon Creek Willamette River Lookout Creek Benson Lake Campers Lake Map 06 Prince Lake Scott Lake Triangle Lake Melakwa Lake Little Lake Blue River Reservoir Spring Lake Map 05 Dearborn Island Linton Lake Blue River Collier Glacier Horse Creek Coburg Renfrew Glacier Deadwood Creek Lily Lake Eileen Lake e k Mohawk River Irving Glacier Lake Marr a L Map 07 Husband Lake Mussel Lake Lake Creek e Eugene Water And Electric Boar Map 08 g Map 09 d Dune Lake Mercer Lake Erskine Log Pond i R Cougar Reservoir Lost Creek Glacier n Buck Meadows r Amazon Creek Diversion Channel Tokatee Lakes Forcia And Larsen Reservoir e F Kidney Lake Clark Glacier Dew Lake Walterville Reservoir Map 10 Q Street Canal McKenzie River Separation Lake Eugene Walterville Canal Karl Lake Clear Lake Map 11 Little Hahnee Reservoir Veneta Springfield Map 12 Coyote Creek Quaking Aspen Swamp North Fork Siuslaw River Sweet Creek Noti Creek Reservoir Nash Lake Duncan Inlet Griffith Reservoir
    [Show full text]
  • Notes on the Bohemia Mining District, Oregon
    NOTES ON THE BOHEMIA MINING DISTRICT, OREGON. By DONALD FRANCIS MACDONALD. INTRODUCTION. The Bohemia mining district is in Lane and Douglas counties, west-central Oregon. It lies on Calapooya Mountain, in the western foothills of the Cascade Range. The district is about 30 miles south­ east of Cottage Grove, a small town on the Southern Pacific Railroad. The Oregon and Southeastern Railroad runs from Cottage Grove to Disston, within 12 miles of the mines, which are reached by stage. In August, 1908, the writer made a short stay in this district and incidentally to otl}er work visited some of the larger mineral proper­ ties. For some of the data presented• herein he is indebted to Mr. J. S. Diller, of the United States Geological Survey, who made a reconnaissance of the region in 1898,a and for many courtesies to Messrs. L. D. Ryan, F. J. Hard, W. W. Warner, and other mining men of the district. PHYSIOGRAPHY AND GENERAL GEOLOGY. The relief of the district is pronounced. Several peaks are more than 6,000 feet high, and the elevation of the lowest valleys is less than 2,000 feet. This bold relief is the result of mountain glaciation and stream ero&ion. The luxuriant vegetation due to the humid climate has somewhat masked the geologic features of the region. Great forests clothe the mountain slopes and the region is notable for its timber value. The rocks of the district are andesitic lavas and tuft's of Tertiary age, which are cut by dacite porphyry and probably by basalt.
    [Show full text]
  • Metalliferous Mineral Deposits of the Cascade Range in Oregon
    UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR Harold L. Ickes, Secretary GEOLOGICAL SURVEY W. C. Mendenhall, Director Bulletin 893 METALLIFEROUS MINERAL DEPOSITS OF THE CASCADE RANGE IN OREGON BY EUGENE CALLAGHAN AND A. F. BUDDINGTON Prepared in cooperation with the STATE MINING BOARD OF OREGON UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE WASHINGTON : 1938 For sale by the Superintendent of Documents, Washington, D.C. ------ Price 1.25 CONTENTS Page Abstract__. ..................................................... 1 Introduction ^..................................................... 3 Field work and acknowledgments..__---___-____.__..._.___.__._. 3 Previous work. .___________ ________________________________ 4 Surface features^ .:...-............ ____________..___..__.__.___ 6 Climate and vegetation__.___________________________________ 7 Accessibility- ________--___-___-___----_-___-__________________ 7 Geology. _ ___.-----_-----_----------------------------_--___---_-_ 7 General features.--------_-_----___----__----___--_-_,_____.___ 7 Sedimentary rocks of the Rogue River and Bear Creek Valleys._-__- 10 Black lavas of the western margin of the Cascade Range-_-__-_-_-__ 1C Gray andesitic lavas and associated rocks of the Western Cascades._ 11 General features-_---_--_--------_--------..----_--_------__ 11 Basalt -_-i__---___-_---__---_-___--___--._________-___ 12 Labradorite andesite (basaltic andesite)__.__________________ 13 Normal andesite_-________________________________________ 13 Rhyolite-_________________________________________________
    [Show full text]