DOCSLIB.ORG

Metalliferous Mineral Deposits of the Cascade Range in Oregon

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR Harold L. Ickes, Secretary GEOLOGICAL SURVEY W. C. Mendenhall, Director Bulletin 893 METALLIFEROUS MINERAL DEPOSITS OF THE CASCADE RANGE IN OREGON BY EUGENE CALLAGHAN AND A. F. BUDDINGTON Prepared in cooperation with the STATE MINING BOARD OF OREGON UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE WASHINGTON : 1938 For sale by the Superintendent of Documents, Washington, D.C. ------ Price 1.25 CONTENTS Page Abstract__. ..................................................... 1 Introduction ^..................................................... 3 Field work and acknowledgments..__---___-____.__..._.___.__._. 3 Previous work. .___________ ________________________________ 4 Surface features^ .:...-............ ____________..___..__.__.___ 6 Climate and vegetation__.___________________________________ 7 Accessibility- ________--___-___-___----_-___-__________________ 7 Geology. _ ___.-----_-----_----------------------------_--___---_-_ 7 General features.--------_-_----___----__----___--_-_,_____.___ 7 Sedimentary rocks of the Rogue River and Bear Creek Valleys._-__- 10 Black lavas of the western margin of the Cascade Range-_-__-_-_-__ 1C Gray andesitic lavas and associated rocks of the Western Cascades._ 11 General features-_---_--_--------_--------..----_--_------__ 11 Basalt -_-i__---___-_---__---_-___--___--._________-___ 12 Labradorite andesite (basaltic andesite)__.__________________ 13 Normal andesite_-________________________________________ 13 Rhyolite-_________________________________________________ 14 Fragmental rocks -_---_---__-------_--_----__----________ 14 Lavas and associated rocks of the High Cascades__-._____.___.____ 15 Dioritic intrusive rocks and contact metamorphism in the Western Cascades- ___------------__---_-:.--_----------_------_-----_ 16 Structure.. _ --__-___---___-_------------_-__-_-_--_-_--__--___ 18 Summary of geologic events__________________________________ 21 Mineral deposits-__-___--_._-_____.___-_----_-__-_--_________-____ 22 General features.-._-----____--_.-_-_--_-___-._-.__._____._-___ 22 History and production. _____________________i_________________ 23 Mineralogy ___________ .............^................... ___--__ 24 Classification of veins__-_---___-_---i___---.i-____________-__--_ 29 Rock alteration____ ...........L. ........^...^^.............. 30 Weathering of veins__-________-__i________________________--__ 32 Vein structure and ore shoots._ _ _ ^ _. i_i__-____.___________._____ 33 Zoning of mineral deposits.__.._-.__--__.-_--_.__-_.________--_. 35 Genesis__ _- -._--_---__-_-__-___--_______-_______________--__ 36 Placers__-_--_--_-_.----__-____-_ -_-__-__-_-___--_____-_-._---_ 36 Economic considerations.________________________________________ 37 Mineralized areas and mining districts.____-_--_-----_____-______---_ 38 Bohemia district.._i_-_-__--_---_-_--_---___-______-_____---_-- 38 Location and accessibility----.------.--..----._--..-_..---- 39 Surface features-_-_----_-____---------------_-_-__---_--_- 39 Geology- .........-..^..... ............................. 40 General features.---._--_-------_----_---_.-.--_-___--- 40 Volcanic rocks.____.-______-__-__-_-_-.______._-__---- 40 Dioritic-intrusive rocks_--_-_-_---.--------------------- 41 Contact-metamorphic rocks__--_------.-___---__---_---- 42 Structure- _____________________________________________ 42 ui IV CONTENTS Mineralized areas and mining districts Continued. Bohemia district Continued. Mineral deposits._________________.,.--_______-_____________.. 44 General features____---------------------------_---_._- 44 History and production._______________________________ 44 Classification...._ _______---__-_--_-__--_____-___-_____ 47 Base-metal veins with variable amounts of gold _______ 47 Veins of quartz and clay minerals_____.__-___._.-__ 47 Pyrite and cherty quartz veins._____________________ 48 Chalcopyrite and quartz veins__.____-__.___--__-__. 48 Gold-quartz and gold-calcite-quartz veins___________ 48 Stibnite-pyrite-quartz veins_______________________ 48 Specularite and magnetite veinlets and disseminated specularite..._-__--_----__------__-_____________ 48 Disseminated pyrite._-------__----___-____________ 48 Zonal arrangement._ .-----_-_------_______-___._____ 48 Hydrothermal and supergene alteration of wall rock. ______ 49 Future of the district_____----_---_----_--___-.__._____ 50 Mines and prospects._____----_-_--___---_-_-______________ 51 Champion and Evening Star.___________________________ 51 Helena._-__-_-__----_-_--___--_-________.____.______. 54 Musick_ ____----_--__-_-___-_____-__________________ 57 Noonday.____-_--_---_---__---____---________________ 60 Vesuvius.____________________________________________ 62 Combination. _ _____-_--_---__---______________________ 63 Cosmos ____-_-------------_-----__--__-___-__-_____._ 64 Cripple Creek.________________________________________ 65 Crystal_ ____________________________________________ 66 El Capitan, President, or ChurchiLL _ ____________________ 67 Glenwood.___________________________________________ 67 Four Monte._________________________________________ 67 Gem, Rico, and Slide._----_-_-__----___-_____-___.____ 67 Gold Cross..__.___.._-----__..._.......___..._. 67 Golden Slipper.-____------___-______--_---_______.__.. 67 Gray Eagle and Alice.---.-.---______________________ 68 Grizzly_____________________________________________ 68 Ingham. ________-_--_------__-__---_-______--_-______ 69 Leroy._ _______---_----_---_---__---_-----___-_______i 69 Mayflower________._- -..._ _____________________ 70 North Fairview_--_---------_------------------___---. 71 Ophir.______..--_---_----------___---_-.___.__ 72 Oregon-Colorado ______________________________________ 72 Orofino___________--__-____---_--_-__---__-.___-____ 73 Peekaboo___..__. __________ _. _____ 73 Rattlesnake..________-_-_---_-___---___---___-___-____ 74 Reed and Fletcher__---_-_---__--_-_---_-----_--__ 74 Riverside.- _ _-______-'--------------------------__--_-- 74 Shotgun _ ______________----__-____--------_---------_. 75 Star-.______-_____.-.--_-.-----.--------------------_ 75 Stonewall...--.-- _---_---_ _-____-____--_-_--___ 76 Sunset.__----_-_------------------ -_._--_--..-___ 70 Syndicate- _.-__-____--_-_----_----_--------_---------. 77 Sweepstakes __________________________________________ 78 CONTENTS V Mineralized areas and mining districts Continued. Bohemia district Continued. Mines and prospects Continued. Pftse Tall Timber-----.-'-----------------------..--.-----_.. 78 Utopian _______-_-_--__---_--__---------_-_-_-_------- 78 War Eagle.._._ - 79 Yellow Jacket..__-.---___.______-- .......... 80 Other prospects... ... -- -_ -_-~ 81 Cheeney Creek area______-_---_-_-_-.__----_-__-_____.__-_-_ 81 North Santiam di8trict______--_-------_-------_--__----_-_-_-__ 82 Location and accessibility---------.----------..-----------.. 82 Surface features..._____-_-------___-_--__-_-_.___---___.._ 82 Geology. _-.--__-. .-_..---- __.--____ .__ ._ 83 Volcanic rocks.__-_-_--_----____--__-_--__--_-___---__ 83 Dioritic intrusive rocks..___._-_____.__._---____..______ 83 Contact-metamorphic rocks _____-_--______._____..__. 84 Structure __---_ - - -._-.__ __ _ 84 Mineral deposits_____-_--_------_-_--_----_---_-_-_-_---_- 85 History and production.__._____-____._-_..__________-_ 85 Mineralogy and types of vein8_-_-_-_--_--__-----___.-_. 85 Mines and prospects.______________________________________ 87 Amalgamated ______-_---_______--_--_---__-__-_-___._- 87 Bimetallic and Goldbug-...__.-_.__._.-_.___.__ 89 Black Eagle--.--.--------___-_-_-__--_.--.-.__-.- 89 Blende Oro.........__---_-_-___---_______-._--.-_..- 90 Capital- ------.----.-.-------------------------__ 91 . Crown ._____-__--_-_-----__-__---_-_---__--_-_____-__ 91 Elkhorn Creek-..._--_--.._._..._.__________.. 93 Gold Creek M. & M-.-._.__....-----.-.-......__.._... 93 Mineral Harbor_______________________________________ 94 Ogle Mountain.____-____-.___.___.____.._-_--.____--._ 94 Riverside -__---_-__-__-________--.---__________-______ 95 Santiam._ ____________________________________________ 95 Silver King_____ _______ _ ____________ 97 Silver Star.._____..._______.__________._- 98 Wolz. -.__-.-----.-----------------.....-.--__-.__.--. 98i Other prospects.___-_-___.-______-_-_____.__________._ 99 Quartzville district..______-_----._______-_____-.-________-_-- 99 Location and accessibility.-..-__..______-________________.__. 99 Surface features._______---_-____-____-___-____-_-______.__ 99 Geology________.___._______.__________ 1(30 Volcanic rocks..-__-----___-_-_-_-__-_________________ 100 Dioritic intrusive rocks and contact metamorphism.___.__. 100 Structure.._-_--_-------__-__-_-_-_-____________._._.. 101 Mineral deposits--_____-_________________L__..____________ 101 History and production.--..___.._._-__-_-.._____---___ 101 Mineralogy and types of veins.-_------ ____-________._ 102 Mines and prospects.____--_--______-___________-____._.__. 103 Albany.-_-______________________________.____________ 103 Bob and Betty or Smith and McLeary.__________________ 105 Galena.--_-_.-_._________-_._....____________ 106 Golden Fleece.___._._-____._.__-____.__._.___... 106 Hastings.--_-.______-.__..__._..._.________________ 106 Y! CONTENTS Mineralized areas and mining districts Continued. Quartzville district Continued. Mines and prospects Continued. Lawler ______________---_____-_:._____.._______..________ 107 "Mammoth Reef_____--_--_--_-______________________ 108 Mule...._.--.._.._.-.__ __...___.______.. 108 Munro._..._.__.._-
Recommended publications
  • In Partial Fulfillment Of

    In Partial Fulfillment Of

    WATER UTILI AT'ION AND DEVELOPMENT IN THE 11ILLAMETTE RIVER BASIN by CAST" IR OLISZE "SKI A THESIS submitted to OREGON STATE COLLEGE in partialfulfillment of the requirements for the degree of MASTER OF SCIENCE June 1954 School Graduate Committee Data thesis is presented_____________ Typed by Kate D. Humeston TABLE OF CONTENTS CHAPTER PAGE I. INTRODUCTION Statement and History of the Problem........ 1 Historical Data............................. 3 Procedure Used to Explore the Data.......... 4 Organization of the Data.................... 8 II. THE WILLAMETTE RIVER WATERSHED Orientation................................. 10 Orography................................... 10 Geology................................. 11 Soil Types................................. 19 Climate ..................................... 20 Precipitation..*.,,,,,,,................... 21 Storms............'......................... 26 Physical Characteristics of the River....... 31 Physical Characteristics of the Major Tributaries............................ 32 Surface Water Supply ........................ 33 Run-off Characteristics..................... 38 Discharge Records........ 38 Ground Water Supply......................... 39 CHAPTER PAGE III. ANALYSIS OF POTENTIAL UTILIZATION AND DEVELOPMENT.. .... .................... 44 Flood Characteristics ........................ 44 Flood History......... ....................... 45 Provisional Standard Project: Flood......... 45 Flood Plain......... ........................ 47 Flood Control................................ 48 Drainage............
  • Strategy Habitat: Ponderosa Pine Woodlands

    Strategy Habitat: Ponderosa Pine Woodlands

    Habitat: Conservation Summaries for Strategy Habitats Strategy Habitat: Ponderosa Pine Woodlands Ecoregions: Conservation Overview: Ponderosa Pine Woodlands are a Strategy Habitat in the Blue Moun- Ponderosa pine habitats historically covered a large portion of the tains, East Cascades, and Klamath Mountains ecoregions. Blue Mountains ecoregion, as well as parts of the East Cascades and Klamath Mountains. Ponderosa pine is still widely distributed in eastern Characteristics: and southern Oregon. However, the structure and species composition The structure and composition of ponderosa pine woodlands varies of woodlands have changed dramatically. Historically, ponderosa pine across the state, depending on local climate, soil type and moisture, habitats had frequent low-intensity ground fires that maintained an elevation, aspect and fire history. In Blue Mountains, East Cascades open understory. Due to past selective logging and fire suppression, and Klamath Mountains ecoregions, ponderosa pine woodlands have dense patches of smaller conifers have grown in the understory of pon- open canopies, generally covering 10-40 percent of the sky. Their derosa pine forests. Depending on the area, these conifers may include understories are variable combinations of shrubs, herbaceous plants, shade-tolerant Douglas-fir, grand fir and white fir, or young ponderosa and grasses. Ponderosa woodlands are dominated by ponderosa pine, pine and lodgepole pine. These dense stands are vulnerable to drought but may also have lodgepole, western juniper, aspen, western larch, stress, insect outbreaks, and disease. The tree layers act as ladder fuels, grand fir, Douglas-fir, incense cedar, sugar pine, or white fir, depend- increasing the chances that a ground fire will become a forest-destroy- ing on ecoregion and site conditions.
  • Analysis of Fixed-Station Water-Quality Data in the Umpqua River Basin, Oregon

    Analysis of Fixed-Station Water-Quality Data in the Umpqua River Basin, Oregon

    ANALYSIS OF FIXED-STATION WATER-QUALITY DATA IN THE UMPQUA RIVER BASIN, OREGON By Joseph F. Rinella Water-Resources Investigations Report 85-4253 Portland, Oregon 1986 UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR DONALD PAUL HODEL, Secretary GEOLOGICAL SURVEY Dallas L. Peck, Director For additional information Copies of this report can write to: be purchased from: U.S. Geological Survey Open-File Services Section Water Resources Division Western Distribution Branch 847 N.E. 19th Ave., Suite 300 Box 25425, Federal Center Portland, Oregon 97232 Denver, Colorado 80225 (Telephone: (303) 776-7476) 11 CONTENTS Page Abstract--------------------------------------------------------- 1 Introduction----------------------------------------------------- 2 Purpose and scope------------------------------------------- 2 Description of study area----------------------------------- 2 Hydrogeology----------------------------------------------------- 5 Hydrology-------------------------------------------------------- 8 Population------------------------------------------------------- 10 Land use--------------------------------------------------------- 11 Point-source effluent-------------------------------------------- 11 Surface-water quality-------------------------------------------- 12 Description of available data base-------------------------- 12 Correlations between water-quality constituents and instantaneous river discharge----------------------------- 14 Comparision of constituent concentrations, loadings, and yields ------------------------------------------------
  • North Cascades Contested Terrain

    North Cascades Contested Terrain

    North Cascades NP: Contested Terrain: North Cascades National Park Service Complex: An Administrative History NORTH CASCADES Contested Terrain North Cascades National Park Service Complex: An Administrative History CONTESTED TERRAIN: North Cascades National Park Service Complex, Washington An Administrative History By David Louter 1998 National Park Service Seattle, Washington TABLE OF CONTENTS adhi/index.htm Last Updated: 14-Apr-1999 http://www.nps.gov/history/history/online_books/noca/adhi/[11/22/2013 1:57:33 PM] North Cascades NP: Contested Terrain: North Cascades National Park Service Complex: An Administrative History (Table of Contents) NORTH CASCADES Contested Terrain North Cascades National Park Service Complex: An Administrative History TABLE OF CONTENTS Cover Cover: The Southern Pickett Range, 1963. (Courtesy of North Cascades National Park) Introduction Part I A Wilderness Park (1890s to 1968) Chapter 1 Contested Terrain: The Establishment of North Cascades National Park Part II The Making of a New Park (1968 to 1978) Chapter 2 Administration Chapter 3 Visitor Use and Development Chapter 4 Concessions Chapter 5 Wilderness Proposals and Backcountry Management Chapter 6 Research and Resource Management Chapter 7 Dam Dilemma: North Cascades National Park and the High Ross Dam Controversy Chapter 8 Stehekin: Land of Freedom and Want Part III The Wilderness Park Ideal and the Challenge of Traditional Park Management (1978 to 1998) Chapter 9 Administration Chapter 10 http://www.nps.gov/history/history/online_books/noca/adhi/contents.htm[11/22/2013
  • Mineralization at Le Pulec, Jersey, Channel Islands; No. 1 Lode

    Mineralization at Le Pulec, Jersey, Channel Islands; No. 1 Lode

    134 SHORT COMMUNICATIONS REFERENCES McKay, W. J. (1975) Woodlawn copper-lead-zinc orebody. Ibid. 701-10. Davis, L. W. (1975) Captains Flat lead-zinc orebody. In Knight, C. L. (ed.). Economic Geology of Australia and Papua New Guinea I. Metals. Melbourne, Australasian [Revised manuscript received 2 June 1981] Institute of Mining and Metallurgy, 691-700. Malone, E. J., Olgers, F., Cucchi, F. G., Nicholas, T., and t~) Copyright the Mineralogical Society Dept. of Geology, University of Wollonoong, New South Wales, Australia F. IVOR ROBERTS [Present address: School of Applied Geology, University of New South Wales, PO Box 1, Kensinoton , NSW 2033, Australia] MINERALOGICAL MAGAZINE, MARCH 1982, VOL. 46, PP. 134-6 Mineralization at Le Pulec, Jersey, Channel Islands; No. 1 Lode THE No. 1 Lode is the westernmost and most Mineralization within the Brioverian sediments extensive of three lead-zinc veins cutting Brioverian sediments at Le Pulec. It was described by Williams Anatase is common within the sediments as 2-10 (1871) as being between 1.5 and 1.8 m in width and pm anhedral grains associated with silicates or 183 m in length, with a trend of 340 ~ and the as 10 x 2 #m laths, parallel to the basal cleavage galena was reported to have a high silver content. of the altered phyllosilicates, particularly musco- Since the investigation of the No. 3 Lode (Ixer and vite. Anatase is also found with hematite laths Stanley, 1980) it has been possible to examine (20x 2 /~m) included in early pyrite grains. A several specimens, collected from the recently re- coarse-grained (600 x 20 pm) generation of anatase discovered No.
  • The Nature of Waste Associated with Closed Mines in England and Wales

    The Nature of Waste Associated with Closed Mines in England and Wales

    The nature of waste associated with closed mines in England and Wales Minerals & Waste Programme Open Report OR/10/14 BRITISH GEOLOGICAL SURVEY MINERALS & WASTE PROGRAMME OPEN REPORT OR/10/14 The National Grid and other Ordnance Survey data are used with the permission of the The nature of waste associated Controller of Her Majesty’s Stationery Office. OS Topography © Crown with closed mines in England and Copyright. All rights reserved. BGS 100017897/2010 Wales Keywords Abandoned mine waste facilities; Palumbo-Roe, B and Colman, T England and Wales; mineral deposits; environmental impact; Contributor/editor European Mine Waste Directive. Cameron, D G, Linley, K and Gunn, A G Front cover Graiggoch Mine (SN 7040 7410), Ceredigion, Wales. Bibliographical reference Palumbo-Roe, B and Colman, T with contributions from Cameron, D G, Linley, K and Gunn, A G. 2010. The nature of waste associated with closed mines in England and Wales. British Geological Survey Open Report, OR/10/14. 98pp. Copyright in materials derived from the British Geological Survey’s work is owned by the Natural Environment Research Council (NERC) and the Environment Agency that commissioned the work. You may not copy or adapt this publication without first obtaining permission. Contact the BGS Intellectual Property Rights Section, British Geological Survey, Keyworth, e-mail [email protected]. You may quote extracts of a reasonable length without prior permission, provided a full acknowledgement is given of the source of the extract. The views and statements expressed in this report are those of the authors alone and do not necessarily represent the views of the Environment Agency.
  • In the Upper Blue River Drainage of the Mckenzie River Ranger District, Willamette National Forest

    In the Upper Blue River Drainage of the Mckenzie River Ranger District, Willamette National Forest

    FY2009 ISSSP Surveys for Salamander Slug [aka Axetail Slug] (Gliabates oregonius) in the Upper Blue River drainage of the McKenzie River Ranger District, Willamette National Forest. Authored by Joe Doerr and Tiffany Young, Wildlife Biologists, Willamette National Forest, 10/20/2009. In 2008, the salamander slug (Gliabates oregonius), also known as the axetail slug, was added to the sensitive species list for the Bureau of Land Management and the Forest Service in the Pacific Northwest. This species was first described as Gliabates oregonia from specimens collected in north-central Lane County (Webb 1959). The scientific name was subsequently changed to Gliabates oregonius by other researchers (Tom Burke personal communication). Gliabates oregonius is classified a S1 species endemic to Oregon and confirmed from a handful of locations in the Cascade and Coast Ranges within the Willamette River drainage. The mollusk is reported associated with conifer and leaf litter in Douglas-fir (Psuedotsuga menziesii) and western hemlock (Tsuga heterophylla) forest habitat. Due to its apparent low abundance and association with forest habitat, there is considerable potential for negative impacts from silvicultural activities, such as logging, fuel treatments and prescribed burning. There is a management need to better understand the abundance and distribution of this species. Following its inclusion on the sensitive species list, biologists on the McKenzie River Ranger District reviewed previous mollusk surveys conducted under the “Survey and Manage Program”. In their review they found a high number of reported detections of axetail slugs in the upper portion of the Blue River drainage. The reports showed detections of 139 individuals at 86 locations during surveys in the fall of 1998 and the spring of 1999 connected with a timber sale planned in that area.
  • Geological Sukvey

    Geological Sukvey

    DEPABTMENT OF THE IHTERIOE BULLETIN OF THE UNITED STATES GEOLOGICAL SUKVEY No. 148 WASHINGTON' G-OVEKNMENT PRINTING OFFICE 1897 UNITED STATES GEOLOGICAL SUEYEY CHARLES D. WALCOTT, 'DIRECTOR ANALYSES OF ROCKS ANALYTICAL METHODS LABORATORY OF THE UNITED STATES GEOLOGICAL SURVEY 1880 to 1896 BY F. W. CLAEKE AND W. F. HILLEBEAND WASHINGTON GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE 1897 CONTENTS. Pago. Introduction, by F. W. Clarke ....'.......................................... 9 Some principles and methods of analysis applied to silicate rocks; by W. F. Hillebrand................................................................ 15 Part I. Introduction ................................................... 15 Scope of the present paper .......................................... 20 Part II. Discussion of methods ..................................i....... 22 Preparation of sample....................:.......................... 22 Specific gravity. ............................: ......--.........--... 23 Weights of sample to be employed for analysis....................... 26 Water, hygroscopic ................................ ................. 26 Water, total or combined....... ^.................................... 30 Silica, alumina, iron, etc............................................ 34 Manganese, nickel, cobalt, copper, zinc.............................. 41 Calcium and strontium...................................... ........ 43 Magnesium......................................................... 43 Barium and titanium............... .... ............................
  • Mckenzie River Sub-Basin Action Plan 2016-2026

    Mckenzie River Sub-Basin Action Plan 2016-2026

    McKenzie River Sub-basin Strategic Action Plan for Aquatic and Riparian Conservation and Restoration, 2016-2026 MCKENZIE WATERSHED COUNCIL AND PARTNERS June 2016 Photos by Freshwaters Illustrated MCKENZIE RIVER SUB-BASIN STRATEGIC ACTION PLAN June 2016 MCKENZIE RIVER SUB-BASIN STRATEGIC ACTION PLAN June 2016 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS The McKenzie Watershed Council thanks the many individuals and organizations who helped prepare this action plan. Partner organizations that contributed include U.S. Forest Service, Eugene Water & Electric Board, Oregon Department of Fish and Wildlife, Bureau of Land Management, U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, McKenzie River Trust, Upper Willamette Soil & Water Conservation District, Lane Council of Governments and Weyerhaeuser Company. Plan Development Team Johan Hogervorst, Willamette National Forest, U.S. Forest Service Kate Meyer, McKenzie River Ranger District, U.S. Forest Service Karl Morgenstern, Eugene Water & Electric Board Larry Six, McKenzie Watershed Council Nancy Toth, Eugene Water & Electric Board Jared Weybright, McKenzie Watershed Council Technical Advisory Group Brett Blundon, Bureau of Land Management – Eugene District Dave Downing, Upper Willamette Soil & Water Conservation District Bonnie Hammons, McKenzie River Ranger District, U.S. Forest Service Chad Helms, U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Jodi Lemmer, McKenzie River Trust Joe Moll, McKenzie River Trust Maryanne Reiter, Weyerhaeuser Company Kelly Reis, Springfield Office, Oregon Department of Fish and Wildlife David Richey, Lane Council of Governments Kirk Shimeall, Cascade Pacific Resource Conservation and Development Andy Talabere, Eugene Water & Electric Board Greg Taylor, U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Jeff Ziller, Springfield Office, Oregon Department of Fish and Wildlife MCKENZIE RIVER SUB-BASIN STRATEGIC ACTION PLAN June 2016 Table of Contents EXECUTIVE SUMMARY .................................................................................................................................
  • Lightning Strikes As a Major Facilitator of Prebiotic Phosphorus Reduction on Early Earth ✉ Benjamin L

    Lightning Strikes As a Major Facilitator of Prebiotic Phosphorus Reduction on Early Earth ✉ Benjamin L

    ARTICLE https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-021-21849-2 OPEN Lightning strikes as a major facilitator of prebiotic phosphorus reduction on early Earth ✉ Benjamin L. Hess 1,2,3 , Sandra Piazolo 2 & Jason Harvey2 When hydrated, phosphides such as the mineral schreibersite, (Fe,Ni)3P, allow for the synthesis of important phosphorus-bearing organic compounds. Such phosphides are com- mon accessory minerals in meteorites; consequently, meteorites are proposed to be a main 1234567890():,; source of prebiotic reactive phosphorus on early Earth. Here, we propose an alternative source for widespread phosphorus reduction, arguing that lightning strikes on early Earth potentially formed 10–1000 kg of phosphide and 100–10,000 kg of phosphite and hypo- phosphite annually. Therefore, lightning could have been a significant source of prebiotic, reactive phosphorus which would have been concentrated on landmasses in tropical regions. Lightning strikes could likewise provide a continual source of prebiotic reactive phosphorus independent of meteorite flux on other Earth-like planets, potentially facilitating the emer- gence of terrestrial life indefinitely. 1 Department of Earth and Planetary Sciences, Yale University, New Haven, CT, USA. 2 School of Earth and Environment, Institute of Geophysics and Tectonics, The University of Leeds, Leeds, UK. 3 Department of Geology and Environmental Science, Wheaton College, Wheaton, IL, USA. ✉ email: [email protected] NATURE COMMUNICATIONS | (2021) 12:1535 | https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-021-21849-2 | www.nature.com/naturecommunications 1 ARTICLE NATURE COMMUNICATIONS | https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-021-21849-2 ife on Earth likely originated by 3.5 Ga1 with carbon isotopic Levidence suggesting as early as 3.8–4.1 Ga2,3.
  • Mount Mazama: Explosion Versus Collapse

    Mount Mazama: Explosion Versus Collapse

    Mount Mazama: Explosion versus Collapse WARREN D. SMITH, Ph.D. Professor of Geology University of Oregon CARL R. SWAR TZLOW, Ph.D. Park N aturalist Lassen National Park [Reprint from Bulletin of Geological Society of America. Vol. XLVII , December 1936. ] .. (. I I University of O regon EUGENE BULLETIN OF THE GEOLOGICAL SOCIETY OF AMERICA VOL. 47, PP. 1809-taso. 6 PLS., s FIGS. DECEMBER 31, 1936 MOUNT MAZAMA: EXPLOSION VERSUS COLLAPSE ~y WARREN D. SMITH AND CARL R. SWARTZLOW CONTENTS -Page Introduction ..................................................... •.:..... • 1809 Distribution, character, and amount of erupted material ..•.......• ·• . • . • . • . • 1812 Dillcr's "bn.ckflow" in Clcctwood Cove. • • . • . • • . • .. • . • • • . • • . .. • 1816 Shape nnd character of the crater. • . • . • . • • . • . • . • • • • . • . 1817 Absence of extruded lava of recent date. • . • • • . • . • • • • . • • . 1821 UNIVERSITY OF OREGON MONOGRAPHS· I\1nterinls of the rim . • . • • . • . • . • . • • • • • . 1822 · l\1cchanics of coJiapse. • • . • • • • . • . • • • • . 1824 Studies in Geology and Geography Records of some Pacific rim volcanoes .......•••••••... ·. • • • . • • . • • . • 1827 No; 1. February 1937 Summary and conclusions ........•.......•..•..••••.•.....•....•.•..•..•.• 1820 Published by' the University of Oregon Oregon State System of Higher ·· ILLUSTRATIONS Education, Eugene, Oregon Figure Pago I. Cross section of Crater Lake ............•••...•••••.....•••...••.••. : .. 1810 2. Pumice areas. • • • • . • . • . • . 1813 3. Section in Wheeler
  • Public Comments

    Public Comments

    Revised Willamette Mercury TMDL and Water Quality Management Plan Public Comments Watershed Management 700 NE Multnomah St. Suite 600 Portland, OR 97232 Phone: 503-229-5696 800-452-4011 www.oregon.gov/DEQ DEQ is a leader in restoring, maintaining and enhancing the quality of Oregon’s air, land and water. State of Oregon Department of Environmental Quality 1 This report prepared by: Oregon Department of Environmental Quality 700 NE Multnomah Street, Suite 600 Portland, OR 97232 1-800-452-4011 www.oregon.gov/deq Contact: Kevin Brannan Alex Liverman Andrea Matzke Priscilla Woolverton 503-229-6629 503-229-5080 503-229-5350 541-687-7347 DEQ can provide documents in an alternate format or in a language other than English upon request. Call DEQ at 800-452-4011 or email [email protected]. Table of Contents Introduction ................................................................................................................................................. 1 Comments .................................................................................................................................................... 1 1. Steven Wright, Texas ................................................................................................................... 1 2. Craig & Linda Olson, Oregon ...................................................................................................... 1 3. Tom Quintal, Oregon .................................................................................................................... 6 4. Craig