Copyright by Melissa Nicole Demos 2015

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Copyright by Melissa Nicole Demos 2015 Copyright by Melissa Nicole Demos 2015 The Dissertation Committee for Melissa Nicole Demos certifies that this is the approved version of the following dissertation: Time and the Experience of Narrative in Italian Renaissance Art Committee: ____________________________________ Louis Waldman, Supervisor ____________________________________ Douglas Biow ____________________________________ Mirka Benes ____________________________________ Jeffrey C. Smith ____________________________________ Stephen Campbell ____________________________________ Robert Gaston Time and the Experience of Narrative in Italian Renaissance Art by Melissa Nicole Demos, B.A.; M.A. Dissertation Presented to the Faculty of the Graduate School of the University of Texas at Austin in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree(s) of Doctor of Philosophy The University of Texas at Austin December 2015 Dedication I dedicate this dissertation to my parents, Ted and Bobbie, and to my sister, Krissy. Regardless of how far away from home my interests and studies have taken me over the years, they have always stood by me and supported me. Secondly, I dedicate this work to Maria Huber, my high school Spanish, Italian and Humanities teacher, who opened a door of discovery that changed my life’s trajectory and brought me to where I am today. She has always been, and continues to be, an inspiration. Finally, I dedicate this to my nephews, Hayden and Karson, along with some words of wisdom from Giovanni Pico della Mirandola: Ci invada l'animo una certa sacra ambizione così che non contenti delle cose mediocri aneliamo a quelle elevate, ci sforziamo di conseguirle con tutte le forze (allorché possiamo se lo vogliamo). -Oratio de hominis dignitate, 1486 Let a holy ambition pervade our soul, so that, not satisfied with mediocre things, we strive for the loftiest and apply ourselves with all our strength to pursue them (because we can achieve them, if we want.) -Oration on the dignity of man, 1486 Acknowledgments The idea for this dissertation grew out of two different papers I wrote for graduate courses at UT Austin: one on Dante’s use of art in the Divine Comedy, the other on Leonardo’s Last Supper (much of which became Chapter Four of this dissertation). My studies and interests have always been rooted in the early modern period: not only the art, but the history and literature as well. Thanks to the Italian Studies program at the University of Texas at Austin I was able to pursue both my interests: art history and literature. I feel additionally blessed to have been the part of the inaugural class of the Italian Studies doctoral program at UT Austin, which exists due to the passion and persistence of Daniela Bini. I have had the privilege to see this program grow and prosper. This dissertation is in a large part due to the dedication of my supervisor, Louis Waldman (Art History, UT Austin), who has believed in this project, and in me, from the beginning. He has been truly generous with his time and academic nurturing, and I am very grateful for his guidance and humor—and even for the occasional ‘tough love’ when it was needed. Following the wise advice of William Zinsser, Professor Waldman and I formed the SAEC -Superfluous Adverb Eradication Coalition. Like the Marine’s semper fi, our motto was simplify! It has been wonderful to work with him on this project, and I thank him for his input, for being my advocate, and for helping put together an all-star committee. My committee includes an exceptional group of international scholars to whom I owe much gratitude. To those beyond UT’s forty acres, Stephen Campbell (Johns Hopkins) and Robert Gaston (University of Melbourne), I wish to thank you for your much appreciated insight and feedback. I thank Prof. Campbell for his attentive participation via Skype at my dissertation defense and Prof. Gaston for his detailed report and words of encouragement. I owe many thanks also to Douglas Biow (UT, French and Italian), Mirka Benes (UT, Architecture) and Jeffrey C. Smith (UT, Art History) for taking this journey with me and for all your astute suggestions and comments. To Prof. Biow, I want to say thank you for always ‘keeping it real’ and for your wit. I enjoyed our Ariosto course and I appreciate the chat we had on our way back to the department after the dissertation defense. I have taken to heart what you said. To Professors Benes and Smith: although we did not have the opportunity to work together much at UT, I have really come to appreciate your keen observations and kind words of support and encouragement. Thank you for your valued contributions to my research. v Many thanks to the other professors with whom I have studied and worked over the years; their instruction and guidance have helped shape me and have made me a better teacher and scholar. At the University of Texas at Austin: Daniela Bini, Guy Raffa, Paola Bonifazio, Ann Johns, Allison Frazier and Eva Struhal At the University of Pittsburgh: Dennis Looney, Francesca Savoia, Lina Insana, Kathleen Christian and Rick Donato At the Universita` degli studi di Firenze: Giovanni Cipriani, Cristina de Benedictis, Mina Gregori, Carlo del Bravo, M. Grazia Ciardi Dupré, and Renzo Pecchioli At the California State University at Chico: Eugenio Frongia and Cliff Minor Many thanks to my friends and colleagues who have always being there through all the ups and downs of Grad school, in particular: Matt R., Beatrice M., Ettore M., Paola D., Martino L., Mary S., Paola B., Antonella O., Irene E., Adria F., Catherine J., Elisa V., Stephanie H., Tim A., Lorraine D., Jenny M. They say it takes a village to raise a child; producing a dissertation is no different. Grazie, amici! vi Time and the Experience of Narrative in Italian Renaissance Art by Melissa Nicole Demos, Ph.D. The University of Texas at Austin, 2015 SUPERVISOR: Louis Waldman Abstract For many centuries, painting and sculpture translated the written narratives into images for a host of audiences. Unlike the narratives expressed in literature, music, theater, and film, which develop over time, the static nature of painting and sculpture give them the appearance of being temporally frozen. As such, we tend to think of them as having the ability to evoke only a single moment of a given narrative. Such limitations were the product of scholarly debates of the eighteenth-century that argued that the pictorial arts should portray only a single and precise punctum temporis of any given story. Artists and art theorists of the Renaissance do not appear to have placed such stringent restrictions on visual narratives. Quite the contrary, among the art of the Italian Quattrocento and Cinquecento, one can find a variety of temporal expressions: from the split-second precision of a fixed instant, to the sequenced actions of continuous narratives, to the abridgement of collapsed narrative. Through close readings of both paintings and sculptures in relation to their source texts, this dissertation explores how narrative artwork vii suggested duration and the continuity of a storyline. It considers how some artists may have, wittingly or unwittingly, succeeded in lengthening the intrinsic timelines of their visual narratives through polynarrative approaches: for example, by juxtaposing multiple moments of a single narrative or by combining multiple narratives in a visually seamless manner that does not patently jeopardize the unities of space and time. This dissertation explores not only the polynarrative aspects of some works, it also investigates the importance of the role of the viewer and how the spectator’s process of reading and interaction with the image affects how the experience of narrative unfolds before them. The study presents a method of reading art that aims to serve as a critical model for future inquiries regarding the temporal natures of figurative narratives. viii Contents List of Figures ........................................................................................................ xi Tables .................................................................................................................. xvii Introduction ..............................................................................................................1 A brief historiography of the temporal “limitations” of pictorial arts ..........10 Modern scholarship regarding temporality in the pictorial arts ....................24 Chapter 1: Visualizing Narrative ..........................................................................43 Medieval allegories .......................................................................................52 Word and image ............................................................................................69 Ghiberti’s evolving narrative in the Commentarii ........................................71 Dante’s ekphrasis of Purgatory 10 ...............................................................77 Chapter Two: The Unfolding Annunciation ..........................................................92 The Annunciation: iconographic traditions ................................................103 The Scrovegni Annunciation.......................................................................109 The Dante/Giotto legacy .............................................................................114 Chapter 3: Combining Narrative Sources to Create Implied Timelines ..............122 Combining narrative in images of the Magi ...............................................135 Ghirlandaio’s
Recommended publications
  • THE LATE RENAISSANCE and MANNERISM in SIXTEENTH-CENTURY ITALY 591 17 CH17 P590-623.Qxp 4/12/09 15:24 Page 592
    17_CH17_P590-623.qxp 12/10/09 09:24 Page 590 17_CH17_P590-623.qxp 12/10/09 09:25 Page 591 CHAPTER 17 CHAPTER The Late Renaissance and Mannerism in Sixteenth- Century Italy ROMTHEMOMENTTHATMARTINLUTHERPOSTEDHISCHALLENGE to the Roman Catholic Church in Wittenberg in 1517, the political and cultural landscape of Europe began to change. Europe s ostensible religious F unity was fractured as entire regions left the Catholic fold. The great powers of France, Spain, and Germany warred with each other on the Italian peninsula, even as the Turkish expansion into Europe threatened Habsburgs; three years later, Charles V was crowned Holy all. The spiritual challenge of the Reformation and the rise of Roman emperor in Bologna. His presence in Italy had important powerful courts affected Italian artists in this period by changing repercussions: In 1530, he overthrew the reestablished Republic the climate in which they worked and the nature of their patron- of Florence and restored the Medici to power. Cosimo I de age. No single style dominated the sixteenth century in Italy, Medici became duke of Florence in 1537 and grand duke of though all the artists working in what is conventionally called the Tuscany in 1569. Charles also promoted the rule of the Gonzaga Late Renaissance were profoundly affected by the achievements of Mantua and awarded a knighthood to Titian. He and his suc- of the High Renaissance. cessors became avid patrons of Titian, spreading the influence and The authority of the generation of the High Renaissance prestige of Italian Renaissance style throughout Europe. would both challenge and nourish later generations of artists.
    [Show full text]
  • Catalogue of the Collection of Pictures and Bronzes in the Possession Of
    Catalogue of the Collection of Pictures and Bronzes IN THE POSSESSION OF MR. OTTO BEIT INTRODUCTION AND DESCRIPTIONS DR. WILHELM BODE DIRECTOR-GENERAL OF THE ROYAL MUSEUMS AT BERLIN LONDON PRIVATELY PRINTED AT THE CHISWICK PRESS Of this Catalogue only One Hundred and Twenty-Five Copies have been printed This is No. 26 The Photogravure plates in this Catalogue are by the Berlin Photographic Company of London and Berlin. The plates and letterpress are printed on handmade Japanese paper pro- cured from Tokio. TWf j P*W. INTRODUCTION iORKS of art, and more especially pidfures, have always been regarded as necessary adjundls to every well-appointed English house since the days when Englishmen, making the “ grand tour,” availed themselves of their opportunities for acquiring art treasures in the Netherlands, Italy, France, and Spain (in many cases diredf from private owners), works which in those days were sold for nominal sums, and sometimes were pradlically given away. Ridicule has been freely cast upon the English mania for picking up curios of every description as mementoes of foreign travel, nevertheless it is to this propensity that we owe the preservation of countless works of art which would otherwise have perished; while the descendants of these colledfors have thus become possessed of an inheritance, the value of which in these days is almost incalculable. Pidures thus acquired on the continent, added to innumerable family portraits by the best foreign artists, and later by the leading masters of the British School, gradually filled the halls, corridors, and galleries in the country seats and town houses of the English nobility and gentry, and in this way a large number of important private colledions of pidures came to be formed in Great Britain during the last two hundred years.
    [Show full text]
  • The Italian High Renaissance (Florence and Rome, 1495-1520)
    The Italian High Renaissance (Florence and Rome, 1495-1520) The Artist as Universal Man and Individual Genius By Susan Behrends Frank, Ph.D. Associate Curator for Research The Phillips Collection What are the new ideas behind the Italian High Renaissance? • Commitment to monumental interpretation of form with the human figure at center stage • Integration of form and space; figures actually occupy space • New medium of oil allows for new concept of luminosity as light and shadow (chiaroscuro) in a manner that allows form to be constructed in space in a new way • Physiological aspect of man developed • Psychological aspect of man explored • Forms in action • Dynamic interrelationship of the parts to the whole • New conception of the artist as the universal man and individual genius who is creative in multiple disciplines Michelangelo The Artists of the Italian High Renaissance Considered Universal Men and Individual Geniuses Raphael- Self-Portrait Leonardo da Vinci- Self-Portrait Michelangelo- Pietà- 1498-1500 St. Peter’s, Rome Leonardo da Vinci- Mona Lisa (Lisa Gherardinidi Franceso del Giacondo) Raphael- Sistine Madonna- 1513 begun c. 1503 Gemäldegalerie, Dresden Louvre, Paris Leonardo’s Notebooks Sketches of Plants Sketches of Cats Leonardo’s Notebooks Bird’s Eye View of Chiana Valley, showing Arezzo, Cortona, Perugia, and Siena- c. 1502-1503 Storm Breaking Over a Valley- c. 1500 Sketch over the Arno Valley (Landscape with River/Paesaggio con fiume)- 1473 Leonardo’s Notebooks Studies of Water Drawing of a Man’s Head Deluge- c. 1511-12 Leonardo’s Notebooks Detail of Tank Sketches of Tanks and Chariots Leonardo’s Notebooks Flying Machine/Helicopter Miscellaneous studies of different gears and mechanisms Bat wing with proportions Leonardo’s Notebooks Vitruvian Man- c.
    [Show full text]
  • Experience the Flemish Masters Programme 2018 - 2020
    EXPERIENCE THE FLEMISH MASTERS PROGRAMME 2018 - 2020 1 The contents of this brochure may be subject to change. For up-to-date information: check www.visitflanders.com/flemishmasters. 2 THE FLEMISH MASTERS 2018-2020 AT THE PINNACLE OF ARTISTIC INVENTION FROM THE MIDDLE AGES ONWARDS, FLANDERS WAS THE INSPIRATION BEHIND THE FAMOUS ART MOVEMENTS OF THE TIME: PRIMITIVE, RENAISSANCE AND BAROQUE. FOR A PERIOD OF SOME 250 YEARS, IT WAS THE PLACE TO MEET AND EXPERIENCE SOME OF THE MOST ADMIRED ARTISTS IN WESTERN EUROPE. THREE PRACTITIONERS IN PARTICULAR, VAN EYCK, BRUEGEL AND RUBENS ROSE TO PROMINENCE DURING THIS TIME AND CEMENTED THEIR PLACE IN THE PANTHEON OF ALL-TIME GREATEST MASTERS. 3 FLANDERS WAS THEN A MELTING POT OF ART AND CREATIVITY, SCIENCE AND INVENTION, AND STILL TODAY IS A REGION THAT BUSTLES WITH VITALITY AND INNOVATION. The “Flemish Masters” project has THE FLEMISH MASTERS been established for the inquisitive PROJECT 2018-2020 traveller who enjoys learning about others as much as about him or The Flemish Masters project focuses Significant infrastructure herself. It is intended for those on the life and legacies of van Eyck, investments in tourism and culture who, like the Flemish Masters in Bruegel and Rubens active during are being made throughout their time, are looking to immerse th th th the 15 , 16 and 17 centuries, as well Flanders in order to deliver an themselves in new cultures and new as many other notable artists of the optimal visitor experience. In insights. time. addition, a programme of high- quality events and exhibitions From 2018 through to 2020, Many of the works by these original with international appeal will be VISITFLANDERS is hosting an Flemish Masters can be admired all organised throughout 2018, 2019 abundance of activities and events over the world but there is no doubt and 2020.
    [Show full text]
  • Leonardo in Verrocchio's Workshop
    National Gallery Technical Bulletin volume 32 Leonardo da Vinci: Pupil, Painter and Master National Gallery Company London Distributed by Yale University Press TB32 prelims exLP 10.8.indd 1 12/08/2011 14:40 This edition of the Technical Bulletin has been funded by the American Friends of the National Gallery, London with a generous donation from Mrs Charles Wrightsman Series editor: Ashok Roy Photographic credits © National Gallery Company Limited 2011 All photographs reproduced in this Bulletin are © The National Gallery, London unless credited otherwise below. All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including BRISTOL photocopy, recording, or any storage and retrieval system, without © Photo The National Gallery, London / By Permission of Bristol City prior permission in writing from the publisher. Museum & Art Gallery: fig. 1, p. 79. Articles published online on the National Gallery website FLORENCE may be downloaded for private study only. Galleria degli Uffizi, Florence © Galleria deg li Uffizi, Florence / The Bridgeman Art Library: fig. 29, First published in Great Britain in 2011 by p. 100; fig. 32, p. 102. © Soprintendenza Speciale per il Polo Museale National Gallery Company Limited Fiorentino, Gabinetto Fotografico, Ministero per i Beni e le Attività St Vincent House, 30 Orange Street Culturali: fig. 1, p. 5; fig. 10, p. 11; fig. 13, p. 12; fig. 19, p. 14. © London WC2H 7HH Soprintendenza Speciale per il Polo Museale Fiorentino, Gabinetto Fotografico, Ministero per i Beni e le Attività Culturali / Photo Scala, www.nationalgallery. org.uk Florence: fig. 7, p.
    [Show full text]
  • Janson. History of Art. Chapter 16: The
    16_CH16_P556-589.qxp 12/10/09 09:16 Page 556 16_CH16_P556-589.qxp 12/10/09 09:16 Page 557 CHAPTER 16 CHAPTER The High Renaissance in Italy, 1495 1520 OOKINGBACKATTHEARTISTSOFTHEFIFTEENTHCENTURY , THE artist and art historian Giorgio Vasari wrote in 1550, Truly great was the advancement conferred on the arts of architecture, painting, and L sculpture by those excellent masters. From Vasari s perspective, the earlier generation had provided the groundwork that enabled sixteenth-century artists to surpass the age of the ancients. Later artists and critics agreed Leonardo, Bramante, Michelangelo, Raphael, Giorgione, and with Vasari s judgment that the artists who worked in the decades Titian were all sought after in early sixteenth-century Italy, and just before and after 1500 attained a perfection in their art worthy the two who lived beyond 1520, Michelangelo and Titian, were of admiration and emulation. internationally celebrated during their lifetimes. This fame was For Vasari, the artists of this generation were paragons of their part of a wholesale change in the status of artists that had been profession. Following Vasari, artists and art teachers of subse- occurring gradually during the course of the fifteenth century and quent centuries have used the works of this 25-year period which gained strength with these artists. Despite the qualities of between 1495 and 1520, known as the High Renaissance, as a their births, or the differences in their styles and personalities, benchmark against which to measure their own. Yet the idea of a these artists were given the respect due to intellectuals and High Renaissance presupposes that it follows something humanists.
    [Show full text]
  • Meet the Masters February Program Grade 3 How Artists Portray Women
    Meet the Masters February Program Grade 3 How Artists Portray Women Mary Cassatt "The Child's Bath" Leonardo Da Vinci "Ginevra De' Bend" About the Artist: (See the following pages.) About the Artwork: "The Child's Bath" by Mary Cassatt was painted in 1893. This is one of Cassatt's most famous works, it is typical of her art due to it's emphasis on the figure and the common theme of woman and child. This was painted over one hundred years ago, when homes did not have running water and separate rooms for bathing. Unlike Renaissance painters who tried to create an illusion of reality and depth by using scientific perspective, Cassatt's composition tilt's toward us as if we were looking down from above. Our attention is drawn to the tenderness displayed between the woman and her child. The stripes of the woman's dress and the diamond patterns in the carpet provide an almost flat background on which the figures appear to be three dimensional. Both figures are totally absorbed in the bathing ritual. "Ginevra De' Benci" by Leonardo Da Vinci was painted around 1474. During the time of Leonardo it was customary for young women to have their portraits painted just before their weddings. This was probably Ginevra's wedding portrait as she was married in 1474 at the age of seventeen. In this portrait of Ginevra De' Benci the light floods her face and hair to reveal a glowing the tiny curls of her hair and the rounded shape of her face. The soft fabric of her clothing can be seen in the lower part of the painting.
    [Show full text]
  • The Last Supper Seen Six Ways by Louis Inturrisi the New York Times, March 23, 1997
    1 Andrea del Castagno’s Last Supper, in a former convent refectory that is now a museum. The Last Supper Seen Six Ways By Louis Inturrisi The New York Times, March 23, 1997 When I was 9 years old, I painted the Last Supper. I did it on the dining room table at our home in Connecticut on Saturday afternoon while my mother ironed clothes and hummed along with the Texaco. Metropolitan Operative radio broadcast. It took me three months to paint the Last Supper, but when I finished and hung it on my mother's bedroom wall, she assured me .it looked just like Leonardo da Vinci's painting. It was supposed to. You can't go very wrong with a paint-by-numbers picture, and even though I didn't always stay within the lines and sometimes got the colors wrong, the experience left me with a profound respect for Leonardo's achievement and a lingering attachment to the genre. So last year, when the Florence Tourist Bureau published a list of frescoes of the Last Supper that are open to the public, I was immediately on their track. I had seen several of them, but never in sequence. During the Middle Ages the ultima cena—the final supper Christ shared with His disciples before His arrest and crucifixion—was part of any fresco cycle that told His life story. But in the 15th century the Last Supper began to appear independently, especially in the refectories, or dining halls, of the convents and monasteries of the religious orders founded during the Middle Ages.
    [Show full text]
  • The Representations of Elderly People in the Scenes of Jesus’ Childhood in Tuscan Paintings, 14Th-16Th Centuries
    The Representations of Elderly People in the Scenes of Jesus’ Childhood in Tuscan Paintings, 14th-16th Centuries The Representations of Elderly People in the Scenes of Jesus’ Childhood in Tuscan Paintings, 14th-16th Centuries: Images of Intergeneration Relationships By Welleda Muller The Representations of Elderly People in the Scenes of Jesus’ Childhood in Tuscan Paintings, 14th-16th Centuries: Images of Intergeneration Relationships By Welleda Muller This book first published 2016 Cambridge Scholars Publishing Lady Stephenson Library, Newcastle upon Tyne, NE6 2PA, UK British Library Cataloguing in Publication Data A catalogue record for this book is available from the British Library Copyright © 2016 by Welleda Muller All rights for this book reserved. No part of this book may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted, in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording or otherwise, without the prior permission of the copyright owner. ISBN (10): 1-4438-9049-9 ISBN (13): 978-1-4438-9049-6 This book is dedicated to all of my colleagues and friends from MaxNetAging: Inês Campos-Rodrigues, Kristen Cyffka, Xuefei Gao, Isabel García-García, Heike Gruber, Julia Hoffman, Nicole Hudl, Göran Köber, Jana Kynast, Nora Mehl, and Ambaye Ogato. TABLE OF CONTENTS List of Illustrations ..................................................................................... ix Acknowledgments .................................................................................... xiii Introduction ................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Mona Lisa: a Comparative Evaluation of the Different Versions S
    ONA LISA: A COMPARATIVE EVALUATION OF THE MDIFFERENT VERSIONS AND THEIR COPIES Salvatore Lorusso* Dipartimento di Beni Culturali Alma Mater Studiorum Università di Bologna, Ravenna, Italy Andrea Natali Dipartimento di Beni Culturali Alma Mater Studiorum Università di Bologna, Ravenna, Italy Keywords: “Mona Lisa”, versions, copies 1. Introduction In a previous study [1], which included stylistic and diagnostic analyses, it was found that the oil painting on canvas “Mona Lisa with columns”, part of a private collection in a museum in St. Petersburg (Figure 1), is a copy of the “Mona Lisa” by Leonardo (Figure 2) dating to a period between 1590 and 1660. Noteworthy features include the good quality, readability and expressiveness emanating from the work, which presum- ably is of Nordic influence, specifically German-Flemish. Figure 1. Photograph in the visible of the painting “Mona Lisa with Columns”, St. Petersburg (oil on canvas 63.2 x 85.2 cm ) CONSERVATION SCIENCE IN CULTURAL HERITAGE * Corresponding author: [email protected] 57 Figure 2. The Louvre “Mona Lisa” More specifically, given the importance of the subject, which includes Leonardo’s well-known masterpiece, the conclusion that was reached in defining the above paint- ing a copy of the original, involved examining, from a methodological point of view, investigations carried out in 2004 on the Louvre “Mona Lisa” by the “Center for Re- search and Restoration of the Museums of France”, and published in “Au coeur de La Joconde – Léonard de Vinci Décodé”. This sequence of investigations – which were certainly not aimed at authentication – were examined together with those of the Na- tional Gallery in London, thus enabling comparisons to be made with other works by Leonardo [2-3].
    [Show full text]
  • Church History Building-In-Time
    Church History http://journals.cambridge.org/CHH Additional services for Church History: Email alerts: Click here Subscriptions: Click here Commercial reprints: Click here Terms of use : Click here Building-in-Time: From Giotto to Alberti and Modern Oblivion. By Marvin Trachtenberg. New Haven, Conn.: Yale University Press, 2010. xxvi + 490 pp. \$65.00 cloth. Caroline Bruzelius Church History / Volume 82 / Issue 02 / June 2013, pp 431 - 436 DOI: 10.1017/S0009640713000231, Published online: 20 May 2013 Link to this article: http://journals.cambridge.org/abstract_S0009640713000231 How to cite this article: Caroline Bruzelius (2013). Church History, 82, pp 431-436 doi:10.1017/ S0009640713000231 Request Permissions : Click here Downloaded from http://journals.cambridge.org/CHH, IP address: 193.205.243.200 on 16 Sep 2013 BOOK REVIEWS AND NOTES 431 and polished over Bernard’s entire lifetime and the part cited could come from the 1140s like the other evidence that she cites. It is probably a misreading of the secondary source on the Order’s administration, that we read the statement by Kerr: “individual Cistercian houses were joined together in familial bonds and arranged in a hierarchy” (82). This is only partially correct, for a foremost principle of the Cistercian Charter of Charity (whatever its date) is that Cistercian abbeys and their abbots were to treat one another equally, unlike in the monarchical hierarchy of Cluny. Despite calling Cîteaux “the mother of us all,” there is no single abbot ruling the Order, but a collective head, the General Chapter of all abbots. The chapter on Cistercian spirituality, given the limited space, provides interesting evidence from saints’ lives about (often female) mystics who may have had ties to Cistercians.
    [Show full text]
  • The L3 Exhibitions Catalogue 2010-2014
    The L3 Exhibitions Catalogue 2010-2014 Leonardo da Vinci overview Leonardo da Vinci is a universal genius. He What the public knows about Leonardo is bare- was, of course, an Italian, but he belongs to a ly the tip of the iceberg. His manuscripts con- past that is part of the cultural heritage of every tinue to hide secrets and are worthy of inquiry person and every nation. He is a singular exam- and presentation in new, innovative ways. L3 ple throughout history of a man who possessed explores, discovers and reveals the “unknown an enormous talent and excelled not only as a Leonardo” in order to spark the hidden genius scientist, but also as an artist. Most of the inven- that lies within us all. tions and machines that he designed can in fact be considered works of art. On the same note, Leonardo3 (L3) is the world leader in exclu- his artistic works are both the creations of a sive exhibitions and publications on da Vinci’s master artist and the products of a formidable genius. Each of our exhibitions is the result of scientific brain. work carried out by our own team of researchers who investigate and develop never-seen-before Just as his paintings deserve the kind of investi- machines for each event. gation to which only today’s technology can do justice, so the full extent of his scientific work Our exhibitions are “dynamic” rather than “stat- has yet to be revealed to the public. ic”. We make extensive use of 3D animations, physical models and interactive software to of- fer the public a unique level of interaction and a hands-on “edu-tainment” experience.
    [Show full text]