Floods Flooding Since Early March Has Killed at Least 83 People and Damaged Hundreds of Houses Across Afghanistan

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Floods Flooding Since Early March Has Killed at Least 83 People and Damaged Hundreds of Houses Across Afghanistan Afghanistan: Floods Flooding since early March has killed at least 83 people and damaged hundreds of houses across www.reliefweb.int Afghanistan. Up to 25,000 affected by floods and avalanches. Floods have hit the capital, Created by ReliefWeb on 04 April 2007 Kabul, and cut off major highways, hampering relief efforts. Office for the Coordination of Humanitarian Affairs GMT +4:30 - OCHA Situation Report No. 1, 04 Apr 2007 United Nations KAZAKHSTAN UZBEKISTAN TAJIKISTAN UZBEKISTAN CHINA KYRGYZSTAN TURKMENISTAN Badakhshan Province TAJIKISTAN CHINA - 36 missing due to TURKMENISTAN avalanche on 28 March Kabul JAMMU and KASHMIR AFGHANISTAN Fayzabad IRAN NEPAL Zebak District BADAKHSHAN PAKISTAN AFGHANISTAN - 13 killed, 3 injured INDIA Faryab Province Panjshir Province - 36 damaged houses OMAN - 9 killed Zebak - 40 houses destroyed Meymaneh Shinwari District Laghman Province Badghis Province FARYAB - 4 killed - 8 killed, 8 injured - 1,575 affected - 900 families affected Bamyan Province - 2,500 displaced - 78 houses destroyed - 28 killed JAMMU BADGHIS - 60 houses destroyed PANJSHIR Gulran KAPISA Kunar Province Bamyan - 13 killed, 8 injured Qala-I-Naw PARWAN KUNAR Gulran District - 1,100 houses damaged and Chaghcharan BAMYAN Asadabad - 6 killed Kabul LAGHMAN - 1,530 families affected Hirat KABUL Jalalabad - 1,700 houses destroyed KASHMIR* HIRAT GHOR NANGARHAR ISLAMIC DAY KUNDI Nangarhar Province Ghazni - 99 families affected REPUBLIC OF KHOST GHAZNI IRAN Khost URUZGAN Kabul City Day Kundi Province - 240 houses destroyed Tirin Kot - 35 killed, 24 injured - 1,100 displaced - 40,754 affected SITUATION - 1,268 houses destroyed • Besides human casualties, tens of thousands of hectares of Lashkar Gah agricultural land damaged INTERNATIONAL BOUNDARY • Over 300km of roads destroyed ACTION AFFECTED PROVINCE HILMAND • GovernmentPAKISTAN of Afghanistan declared humanitarian emergencies in 13 of Affected District its 34 provinces and requested assistance from international community National Capital • WFP, UNHCR, IOM, UNHCR and UNICEF, Afghan Red Crescent Society, Populated Place Care and NRC responding with food, shelter and other vital assistance LINKS 0 50 100 • OCHA Situation Report No. 1 Kilometres • Latest updates for Afghanistan: Floods and avalanche INDIA • Related maps Map data sources: UNCS, ESRI, AIMS ______________________________________________________ Based on OCHA Situation Report No. 1, issued 04 April 2007 The boundaries and names shown and the designations used on this map do not imply official endorsement or acceptance by the United Nations. *Dotted line represents approximately the Line of Control in Jammu and Kashmir agreed upon by India and Pakistan. The final status of Jammu and Kashmir has not yet been agreed upon by the parties..
Recommended publications
  • AFGHANISTAN - Base Map KYRGYZSTAN
    AFGHANISTAN - Base map KYRGYZSTAN CHINA ± UZBEKISTAN Darwaz !( !( Darwaz-e-balla Shaki !( Kof Ab !( Khwahan TAJIKISTAN !( Yangi Shighnan Khamyab Yawan!( !( !( Shor Khwaja Qala !( TURKMENISTAN Qarqin !( Chah Ab !( Kohestan !( Tepa Bahwddin!( !( !( Emam !( Shahr-e-buzorg Hayratan Darqad Yaftal-e-sufla!( !( !( !( Saheb Mingajik Mardyan Dawlat !( Dasht-e-archi!( Faiz Abad Andkhoy Kaldar !( !( Argo !( Qaram (1) (1) Abad Qala-e-zal Khwaja Ghar !( Rostaq !( Khash Aryan!( (1) (2)!( !( !( Fayz !( (1) !( !( !( Wakhan !( Khan-e-char Char !( Baharak (1) !( LEGEND Qol!( !( !( Jorm !( Bagh Khanaqa !( Abad Bulak Char Baharak Kishim!( !( Teer Qorghan !( Aqcha!( !( Taloqan !( Khwaja Balkh!( !( Mazar-e-sharif Darah !( BADAKHSHAN Garan Eshkashem )"" !( Kunduz!( !( Capital Do Koh Deh !(Dadi !( !( Baba Yadgar Khulm !( !( Kalafgan !( Shiberghan KUNDUZ Ali Khan Bangi Chal!( Zebak Marmol !( !( Farkhar Yamgan !( Admin 1 capital BALKH Hazrat-e-!( Abad (2) !( Abad (2) !( !( Shirin !( !( Dowlatabad !( Sholgareh!( Char Sultan !( !( TAKHAR Mir Kan Admin 2 capital Tagab !( Sar-e-pul Kent Samangan (aybak) Burka Khwaja!( Dahi Warsaj Tawakuli Keshendeh (1) Baghlan-e-jadid !( !( !( Koran Wa International boundary Sabzposh !( Sozma !( Yahya Mussa !( Sayad !( !( Nahrin !( Monjan !( !( Awlad Darah Khuram Wa Sarbagh !( !( Jammu Kashmir Almar Maymana Qala Zari !( Pul-e- Khumri !( Murad Shahr !( !( (darz !( Sang(san)charak!( !( !( Suf-e- (2) !( Dahana-e-ghory Khowst Wa Fereng !( !( Ab) Gosfandi Way Payin Deh Line of control Ghormach Bil Kohestanat BAGHLAN Bala !( Qaysar !( Balaq
    [Show full text]
  • Afghanistan: Extreme Weather Regional Overview (As of 11 March 2015)
    Afghanistan: Extreme Weather Regional Overview (as of 11 March 2015) Key Highlights: Since 1 February 2015, an estimated 6,181 families have been affected by floods, rain, heavy snow and avalanches in 120 districts in 22 provinces. A total of 224 people were killed and 74 people1 were injured. 1,381 houses were completely destroyed and 4,632 houses were damaged2. The government has declared a phase out of the emergency response in Panjsher. 160 families were reportedly displaced by heavy snowfall in four districts of Faryab province. 300 families are at risk of possible landslides in Kaledi Qashlaq village of Shal district in Takhar province. Meetings and Coordination: National Security Council technical working group As the situation has now stabilized and all provinces are in response mode. Therefore, the frequency of the Working Group meetings is now twice a week, every Sunday and Wednesday. Overview of assessment status: Number of villages yet to be assessed (based on initial unverified reports) Disclaimer: The designations employed and the presentation of material on this map, and all other maps contained herein, do not imply the expression of any opinion whatsoever on the part of the Secretariat of the United Nations concerning the legal status of any country, territory, city or area or of its authorities, or concerning the delimitation of its frontiers or boundaries. Dotted line represents approximately the Line of Control in Jammu and Kashmir agreed upon by India and Pakistan. The final status of Jammu and Kashmir has not yet been agreed upon by the parties. Data sources: AGCHO, OCHA field offices.
    [Show full text]
  • THE ANSO REPORT -Not for Copy Or Sale
    The Afghanistan NGO Safety Office Issue: 72 16-30 April 2011 ANSO and our donors accept no liability for the results of any activity conducted or omitted on the basis of this report. THE ANSO REPORT -Not for copy or sale- Inside this Issue COUNTRY SUMMARY Central Region 2 The IEA announced the ini- salary lines, banks, demon- A second, equally lethal 5 Northern Region tiation of their ‘Spring Offen- stration, arbakai shura and effective trend that has Western Region 10 sive’ on April 29th, an event meetings and shops but we developed in line with the that occurs an a yearly basis will need to monitor the previous, is the surgical Eastern Region 14 and is generally intended as a target pattern closely to targeting of key leadership Southern Region 20 strategic statement regarding fully understand this scope (military, political, and ci- their goals, methodology, as of this term. When taken in vilian) with suicide attacks. 27 ANSO Info Page well as guidance to their lead- conjunction with the in- Of note, this trend, when ership though is also an ele- struction to deliver coupled with the above, ment of their wider infor- “meticulous military plans” proves to be particular dif- YOU NEED TO KNOW mation operations plan. The however we would stop ficult to mitigate for the operation, known as ‘Badar’, short of seeing it as carte target groups, as seen in • IEA announces spring offen- while short on tactical details, blanche to attack any place the penetration of the sive, Operation Badar contains a few comments of that targets recreate or gath- MoD this period in Kabul.
    [Show full text]
  • Transitioning Afghanistan in the Post-Withdrawal Era: Setting the Stage for a Stable Political Order
    Transitioning Afghanistan in the Post-Withdrawal Era: Setting the Stage for a Stable Political Order Reza Sanati * Abstract : Within the coming year, the American led-NATO mission will begin withdrawing troops from Afghanistan. Though the decrease in troop levels in the short-term has been expected, the final date wherein all American and NATO troops leave the country is still a matter of heated debate, primarily for two reasons: the inconclusive steadiness of the present Afghan regime and the uncertainty of what a post-withdrawal Afghanistan would like. With this in mind, this article intends to explore both the logic of NATO intervention and the subsequent occupation of that war-torn country. It examines the primary reasons why stability and progress within Afghanistan have been elusive, the current debate amongst policy makers regarding the steps ahead, and finally proposing an alternative model that proposes a new US and NATO regional strategy that places the burden on Afghanistan stability and reconstruction on neighbors who share the larger NATO goal of a self-sufficient and stable Afghan government. Accordingly, the most potentially successful NATO approach towards Afghan stability would adopt the proven economic, social, political, infrastructural, and local governance models of regional states, and honing and adopting those models into the broader Afghan domestic theatre. For this to happen, a new plan of cooperation from both NATO and American policy makers with regional states and their respective civil societies needs to be
    [Show full text]
  • Men, Masculinities, Conflict and Peacebuilding in Afghanistan
    Navigating norms and insecurity: Men, masculinities, conflict and peacebuilding in Afghanistan WORKING PAPER | NOVEMBER 2018 Henri Myrttinen European Union initiative CONTENTS ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS ........................................................................................................................... 1 INTRODUCTION ....................................................................................................................................... 2 GENDER, CONFLICT AND PEACEBUILDING .............................................................................................. 3 Why masculinities? ............................................................................................................................. 4 BACKGROUND ......................................................................................................................................... 5 Project background ............................................................................................................................. 5 Women, peace and security in Afghanistan ....................................................................................... 6 Background to the target provinces ................................................................................................... 7 RESEARCH FINDINGS ............................................................................................................................. 11 Gender norms ..................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Afghanistan: Floods
    P a g e | 1 Emergency Plan of Action (EPoA) Afghanistan: Floods DREF Operation n° MDRAF008 Glide n°: FL-2021-000050-AFG Expected timeframe: 6 months For DREF; Date of issue: 16/05/2021 Expected end date: 30/11/2021 Category allocated to the disaster or crisis: Yellow EPoA Appeal / One International Appeal Funding Requirements: - DREF allocated: CHF 497,700 Total number of people affected: 30,800 (4,400 Number of people to be 14,000 (2,000 households) assisted: households) 6 provinces (Bamyan, Provinces affected: 16 provinces1 Provinces targeted: Herat, Panjshir, Sar-i-Pul, Takhar, Wardak) Host National Society(ies) presence (n° of volunteers, staff, branches): Afghan Red Crescent Society (ARCS) has around 2,027 staff and 30,000 volunteers, 34 provincial branches and seven regional offices all over the country. There will be four regional Offices and six provincial branches involved in this operation. Red Cross Red Crescent Movement partners actively involved in the operation: ARCS is working with the International Federation of Red Cross and Red Crescent (IFRC) and International Committee of the Red Cross (ICRC) with presence in Afghanistan. Other partner organizations actively involved in the operation: (i) Government ministries and agencies, Afghan National Disaster Management Authority (ANDMA), Provincial Disaster Management Committees (PDMCs), Department of Refugees and Repatriation, and Department for Rural Rehabilitation and Development. (ii) UN agencies; OCHA, UNICEF, Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO), International Organization for Migration (IOM) and World Food Programme (WFP). (iii) International NGOs: some of the international NGOs, which have been active in the affected areas are including, Danish Committee for Aid to Afghan Refugees (DACAAR), Danish Refugee Council (DRC), International Rescue Committee, and Care International.
    [Show full text]
  • Ethnicity, Space, and Politics in Afghanistan
    University of Pennsylvania ScholarlyCommons Urban Studies Senior Seminar Papers Urban Studies Program 11-2009 Ethnicity, Space, and Politics in Afghanistan Benjamin Dubow University of Pennsylvania Follow this and additional works at: https://repository.upenn.edu/senior_seminar Dubow, Benjamin, "Ethnicity, Space, and Politics in Afghanistan" (2009). Urban Studies Senior Seminar Papers. 13. https://repository.upenn.edu/senior_seminar/13 Suggested Citation: Benjamin Dubow. "Ethnicity, Space, and Politics in Afghanistan." University of Pennsylvania, Urban Studies Program. 2009. This paper is posted at ScholarlyCommons. https://repository.upenn.edu/senior_seminar/13 For more information, please contact [email protected]. Ethnicity, Space, and Politics in Afghanistan Abstract The 2004 election was a disaster. For all the unity that could have come from 2001, the election results shattered any hope that the country had overcome its fractures. The winner needed to find a way to unite a country that could not be more divided. In Afghanistan’s Panjshir Province, runner-up Yunis Qanooni received 95.0% of the vote. In Paktia Province, incumbent Hamid Karzai received 95.9%. Those were only two of the seven provinces where more than 90% or more of the vote went to a single candidate. Two minor candidates who received less than a tenth of the total won 83% and 78% of the vote in their home provinces. For comparison, the most lopsided state in the 2004 United States was Wyoming, with 69% of the vote going to Bush. This means Wyoming voters were 1.8 times as likely to vote for Bush as were Massachusetts voters. Paktia voters were 120 times as likely to vote for Karzai as were Panjshir voters.
    [Show full text]
  • Länderinformationen Afghanistan Country
    Staatendokumentation Country of Origin Information Afghanistan Country Report Security Situation (EN) from the COI-CMS Country of Origin Information – Content Management System Compiled on: 17.12.2020, version 3 This project was co-financed by the Asylum, Migration and Integration Fund Disclaimer This product of the Country of Origin Information Department of the Federal Office for Immigration and Asylum was prepared in conformity with the standards adopted by the Advisory Council of the COI Department and the methodology developed by the COI Department. A Country of Origin Information - Content Management System (COI-CMS) entry is a COI product drawn up in conformity with COI standards to satisfy the requirements of immigration and asylum procedures (regional directorates, initial reception centres, Federal Administrative Court) based on research of existing, credible and primarily publicly accessible information. The content of the COI-CMS provides a general view of the situation with respect to relevant facts in countries of origin or in EU Member States, independent of any given individual case. The content of the COI-CMS includes working translations of foreign-language sources. The content of the COI-CMS is intended for use by the target audience in the institutions tasked with asylum and immigration matters. Section 5, para 5, last sentence of the Act on the Federal Office for Immigration and Asylum (BFA-G) applies to them, i.e. it is as such not part of the country of origin information accessible to the general public. However, it becomes accessible to the party in question by being used in proceedings (party’s right to be heard, use in the decision letter) and to the general public by being used in the decision.
    [Show full text]
  • Transition to Afghan Lead: Inteqal
    North Atlantic Treaty Organization Media Backgrounder Transition to Afghan lead: Inteqal Inteqal - the Dari and Pashtu word for Transition – is the process by which security responsibility for Afghanistan is gradually transitioned from NATO/ISAF to Afghan leadership. Key dates: 28 August 2008: Lead security responsibility for Kabul city transferred to Afghan Forces 19 November 2009: President Karzai, having won a second Presidential term, expresses his ambition to see the Afghan National Security Forces take the lead security responsibility across Afghanistan by the end of 2014 20 July 2010: Kabul Conference. The Joint Afghan-NATO Inteqal Board (JANIB) is established as the mechanism to assess districts and provinces for transition 20 November 2010: NATO Lisbon Summit. The Inteqal process is agreed between the Afghan Government and NATO Bamyan Provincial Governor Dr. Sarabi 22 March 2011: Afghan New Year. President Karzai announces the first set of Afghan districts and provinces to start the addresses attendees during the Transition ceremony in Bamyan Province. Transition process 17 July 2011: First Transition ceremony takes place, in Bamyan province October 2011: Afghan Government to announce the second tranche of Transition “Afghanistan’s Transition Tranche 1 On 22 March 2011, President Karzai announced the first set of Afghan districts and provinces to start Transition. This decision drew future is clear: on the assessment and recommendations of the Afghan Government and NATO/ISAF through the Joint Afghan-NATO Inteqal a country led Board (JANIB). Based upon operational, political and economic considerations, the following areas were identified for inclusion in the first ‘tranche’ by Afghans, of Transition: Bamyan province (all districts), Panjshir province (all districts), Kabul province (all districts except Surobi), as well as the municipalities of Mazar-e-Sharif (Balkh province), Herat (Herat province), Lashkar Gah (Helmand province) and Mehtar Lam defended by (Laghman province).
    [Show full text]
  • Afghanistan: Politics, Elections, and Government Performance
    Afghanistan: Politics, Elections, and Government Performance Kenneth Katzman Specialist in Middle Eastern Affairs November 8, 2011 Congressional Research Service 7-5700 www.crs.gov RS21922 CRS Report for Congress Prepared for Members and Committees of Congress Afghanistan: Politics, Elections, and Government Performance Summary The limited capacity and widespread corruption of all levels of Afghan governance are factors in debate over the effectiveness of U.S. policy in Afghanistan and in implementing a transition to Afghan security leadership by the end of 2014. The capacity of the formal Afghan governing structure has increased significantly since the Taliban regime fell in late 2001, but many positions, particularly at the local level, are unfilled. Widespread illiteracy limits expansion of a competent bureaucracy. A dispute over the results of the 2010 parliamentary elections paralyzed governance for nearly a year and was resolved in September 2011 with the unseating on the grounds of fraud of nine winners of the elected lower house of parliament. Karzai also has tried, through direct denials, to quell assertions by his critics that he wants to stay in office beyond the 2014 expiration of his second term, the limits under the constitution. While trying, with mixed success, to build the formal governing structure, Afghan President Hamid Karzai also works through an informal power structure centered around his close ethnic Pashtun allies as well as other ethnic and political faction leaders. Some faction leaders oppose Karzai on the grounds that he is too willing to make concessions to insurgent leaders in search of a settlement—a criticism that grew following the September 20 assassination of the most senior Tajik leader, former President Burhanuddin Rabbani.
    [Show full text]
  • Monthly IDP Report
    CONFLICT - INDUCED INTERNAL DISPLACEMENT—MONTHLY UPDATE UNHCR AFGHANISTAN A P R I L 2 0 1 4 IDPs profiled by the IDP Taskforce in April During April 2014, 7,197 persons (1,185 families) were profiled by the IDP Taskforces. Of those profiled 2,616 persons (36%) were displaced in April, 536 persons (7%) in March, 448 persons (6%) in February, 1,165 persons (16%) in January 2014, 1,338 persons (19%) in December, 629 persons (9%) in November, 270 persons (4%) in October, and 44 persons (1%) in September 2013 while 151 persons (3%) were displaced before September 2013. Total Increase Decrease Total disp laced February March March (all) 2014 2014 2014 659,961 7,197 0 667,158 Regional overview of persons profiled in April end-Mar end-Apr Region Increase Decrease 2014 2014 North 95,644 2,376 - 98,020 South 184,484 - 184,484 Southeast 16,457 498 - 16,955 East 116,821 640 - 117,461 West 175,215 3,320 - 178,535 Central 71,340 363 - 71,703 Central Highlands - - - - Total 659,961 7,197 - 667,158 Comparison of Monthly Trends (2012-2014) *Often, due to lack of humanitarian access or other issues, IDPs are not profiled by the IDP Taskforces until at least several months after their displacement occurred. As a result, this graph is constantly updated to reflect new groups profiled by the Taskforce Snapshot of displacement profiled in April 2014 Fa ryab: 307 families ( 1842 Sarepul: 38 families (261 individuals ) Ba lkh : 4 families ( 26 individuals ) Kunduz: 8 families ( 46 Badakhshan : 33 families ( 201 individuals ) were displaced within were displaced within Sarepul due to were displaced from Alborz village individuals ) were displaced individuals ) were displaced Qaisar district to the district center insecurity, extortion and forced to Mazar city due to armed from Khanabad district to within Badakhshan due to armed due to armed conflict, recruitment in February 2014 .
    [Show full text]
  • Key Highlights Meetings and Coordination Overview of Assessment Status
    Afghanistan: Extreme Weather Regional Overview (as of 24 March 2015) Next update: 1 April 2015 Key highlights Since 1 February, an estimated 8,176 families have been affected by floods, rain, heavy snow and avalanches in 133 districts in 24 provinces. A total of 281 people were killed and 81 people were injured. 1,429 houses were completely destroyed and 6,357 houses were damaged1. MRRD to present to cabinet the consolidated spring contingency plan for Afghanistan. Meetings and coordination National Security Council technical working group MRRD presented the spring contingency plan for Afghanistan, highlighting areas exposed to hazard risks and assumption of possibility of combination of sudden-onset and slow-onset natural disasters, based on early warning information provided by IOM, OCHA, ARCS and ANDMA. Three main hazard risks were identified: floods; landslides, and drought. The contingency plan outlines planning assumptions, disaster management and coordination structures, preparedness requirements and response capacities (stockpiles) of humanitarian and government partners, including line ministries. The contingency plan is still being finalized and will be presented to cabinet on 30 March for final review and endorsement. The Afghanistan Natural Disaster Management Authority (ANDMA) will lead in disseminating the plan to the provinces and follow up on implementation of the plan. Overview of assessment status Number of villages yet to be assessed (based on initial unverified reports) Disclaimer: The designations employed and the presentation of material on this map, and all other maps contained herein, do not imply the expression of any opinion whatsoever on the part of the Secretariat of the United Nations concerning the legal status of any country, territory, city or area or of its authorities, or concerning the delimitation of its frontiers or boundaries.
    [Show full text]