DOCSLIB.ORG

2010 Official Population List

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
2010 Official Population List 2010 Official Population List Official population figures are as of September 1, 2010 in compliance with the Determination of Population Regulation 63/2001 under Section 604 of the Municipal Government Act. Unofficial population figures refer to First Nations population on-reserve as of December 2009. Municipal Services Branch 17th Floor Commerce Place 10155 - 102 Street Edmonton, Alberta T5J 4L4 Phone: (780) 427-2225 Fax: (780) 420-1016 E-mail: [email protected] Printed Version: ISBN 978-0-7785-8022-5 Website Version: ISBN 978-0-7785-8021-8 September 15, 2010 Page 1 of 11 ALBERTA MUNICIPAL AFFAIRS 2010 OFFICIAL POPULATION LIST 2010 MUNICIPAL FEDERAL MUNICIPALITY POPULATION CENSUS DATE CENSUS DATE CITIES (17) Airdrie 39,822 01-Apr-10 Brooks 13,581 07-May-07 Calgary 1,071,515 01-Apr-10 Camrose 16,543 03-Apr-08 Cold Lake 13,924 01-Apr-09 Edmonton 782,439 01-Apr-09 Fort Saskatchewan 18,653 03-May-10 Grande Prairie 50,227 01-Apr-07 Lacombe (see p. 10 for additional information) 11,733 15-Apr-09 Leduc 23,293 03-May-10 Lethbridge 86,659 01-Apr-10 Lloydminster – Alberta side only 17,402 15-Apr-09 (see p. 10 for additional information) Medicine Hat 61,097 01-Jun-09 Red Deer 90,084 09-Apr-10 Spruce Grove 24,646 09-Apr-10 St. Albert 60,138 01-Apr-10 Wetaskiwin 12,285 01-Apr-09 Cities Total 2,394,041 SPECIALIZED MUNICIPALITIES (5) Municipality of Crowsnest Pass 5,749 16-May-06 (see p. 10 for additional information) Municipality of Jasper 4,745 23-Jun-08 (see p. 10 for shadow population) Mackenzie County 10,002 16-May-06 Regional Municipality of Wood Buffalo 91,612 01-Apr-07 (see p. 10 for populations of Fort McMurray and rural service area including shadow population) Strathcona County 87,998 01-May-09 (see p. 10 for populations of Sherwood Park and rural service area) Specialized Municipalities Total 200,106 MUNICIPAL DISTRICTS (64) Acadia No. 34, M.D. of 545 16-May-06 Athabasca No. 12, County of 7,592 16-May-06 (revised federal census) Barrhead No. 11, County of 5,845 16-May-06 Beaver County 5,676 16-May-06 Big Lakes, M.D. of 4,030 16-May-06 Bighorn No. 8, M.D. of 1,454 16-May-06 (revised federal census) Birch Hills County 1,610 14-May-08 Bonnyville No. 87, M.D. of 9,047 16-May-06 Brazeau County 7,040 16-May-06 Camrose County 7,577 01-May-08 September 15, 2010 Page 2 of 11 2010 MUNICIPAL FEDERAL MUNICIPALITY POPULATION CENSUS DATE CENSUS DATE MUNICIPAL DISTRICTS continued . Cardston County 4,266 04-Jun-08 Clear Hills County 3,293 01-Apr-08 (see p. 10 for shadow population) Clearwater County 11,826 16-May-06 Cypress County 6,729 16-May-06 Fairview No. 136, M.D. of 1,856 16-May-06 (revised federal census) Flagstaff County 3,506 16-May-06 Foothills No. 31, M.D. of 19,736 16-May-06 Forty Mile No. 8, County of 3,414 16-May-06 Grande Prairie No. 1, County of 17,989 24-Mar-06 Greenview No. 16, M.D. of 5,464 16-May-06 Kneehill County 5,218 16-May-06 Lac La Biche County 9,123 16-May-06 Lac Ste. Anne County 10,220 15-Apr-08 Lacombe County 10,507 09-Apr-08 Lamont County 3,925 16-May-06 Leduc County 13,260 16-May-06 (see p. 10 for additional information) Lesser Slave River No. 124, M.D. of 2,820 16-May-06 Lethbridge, County of 10,302 16-May-06 Minburn No. 27, County of 3,319 16-May-06 Mountain View County 12,570 11-Jun-07 Newell No. 4, County of 7,101 11-May-09 Northern Lights No. 22, M.D. of 3,556 16-May-06 Northern Sunrise County 2,880 10-Mar-10 (see p. 10 for shadow population) Opportunity No. 17, M.D. of 3,259 01-Apr-07 Paintearth No. 18, County of 2,126 16-May-06 Parkland County 30,089 01-May-09 Peace No. 135, M.D. of 1,487 16-May-06 Pincher Creek No. 9, M.D. of 3,309 16-May-06 Ponoka County 8,640 16-May-06 Provost No. 52, M.D. of 2,547 16-May-06 Ranchland No. 66, M.D. of 86 16-May-06 Red Deer County 19,108 16-May-06 Rocky View County 34,597 03-Apr-06 Saddle Hills County 2,478 26-May-08 Smoky Lake County 2,716 16-May-06 Smoky River No. 130, M.D. of 2,442 16-May-06 Spirit River No. 133, M.D. of 662 16-May-06 St. Paul No. 19, County of 5,925 16-May-06 Starland County 2,371 16-May-06 Stettler No. 6, County of 5,216 16-May-06 Sturgeon County 19,165 26-May-08 Taber, M.D. of 6,714 15-May-08 Thorhild No. 7, County of 3,547 16-May-06 September 15, 2010 Page 2 of 11 2010 MUNICIPAL FEDERAL MUNICIPALITY POPULATION CENSUS DATE CENSUS DATE MUNICIPAL DISTRICTS continued . Two Hills No. 21, County of 2,926 16-May-06 (see p. 10 for additional information) Vermilion River, County of 7,900 01-May-08 Vulcan County 3,830 25-May-07 Wainwright No. 61, M.D. of 4,113 15-May-07 Warner No. 5, County of 3,776 16-May-06 (revised federal census) Westlock County 6,910 16-May-06 Wetaskiwin No. 10, County of 10,535 16-May-06 Wheatland County 8,164 16-May-06 Willow Creek No. 26, M.D. of 5,337 16-May-06 Woodlands County 4,158 16-May-06 Yellowhead County 10,045 16-May-06 Municipal Districts Total 447,474 TOWNS (108) Athabasca 2,734 21-May-08 Banff 8,721 12-Jun-07 (see p. 10 for shadow population) Barrhead 4,209 16-May-06 Bashaw 868 06-Jun-07 Bassano 1,390 01-Jun-07 Beaumont 12,586 01-May-10 Beaverlodge 2,264 16-May-06 Bentley 1,132 01-May-09 Black Diamond 2,308 08-Jun-09 Blackfalds 5,610 01-May-09 Bon Accord 1,534 16-May-06 Bonnyville 6,470 13-Apr-09 Bow Island 1,868 01-Jun-07 Bowden 1,236 11-May-09 Bruderheim 1,215 16-May-06 Calmar 2,033 01-Apr-09 Canmore 12,226 10-Jun-09 Cardston 3,578 15-May-07 Carstairs 2,656 16-May-06 Castor 931 16-May-06 Chestermere 14,285 15-May-10 Claresholm 3,700 16-May-06 Coaldale 6,943 01-Apr-09 Coalhurst 1,953 07-Jun-10 Cochrane 15,424 23-Apr-09 Coronation 1,015 16-May-06 Crossfield 2,861 01-May-10 Daysland 818 16-May-06 Devon 6,534 01-May-09 Didsbury 4,599 28-Apr-08 September 15, 2010 Page 3 of 11 MUNICIPALITY 2010 MUNICIPAL FEDERAL POPULATION CENSUS DATE CENSUS DATE TOWNS continued . Drayton Valley 6,893 16-May-06 Drumheller 7,932 16-May-06 Eckville 1,002 10-May-07 Edson 8,365 26-May-05 Elk Point 1,512 14-May-07 Fairview 3,297 16-May-06 Falher 941 16-May-06 Fort Macleod 3,072 16-May-06 Fox Creek 2,278 16-May-06 Gibbons 2,848 27-Jun-07 Grande Cache 3,783 16-May-06 Granum 445 01-Apr-07 Grimshaw 2,537 16-May-06 Hanna 2,847 16-May-06 Hardisty 761 28-Jun-05 High Level 3,887 16-May-06 High Prairie 2,836 01-Jun-07 High River 11,783 25-May-10 Hinton 9,825 13-Apr-09 Innisfail 7,883 11-May-09 Irricana 1,243 16-May-06 Killam 1,019 16-May-06 Lamont 1,664 16-May-06 Legal 1,192 16-May-06 Magrath 2,302 01-Jun-10 Manning 1,493 16-May-06 Mayerthorpe 1,474 16-May-06 McLennan 824 16-May-06 Milk River 846 01-May-07 Millet 2,125 20-May-05 Morinville 7,636 26-May-09 Mundare 823 01-Apr-09 Nanton 2,124 01-Jun-09 Okotoks 23,201 01-May-10 Olds 7,248 16-May-06 Onoway 1,021 07-Jun-10 Oyen 1,190 15-Jun-09 Peace River 6,315 16-May-06 Penhold 2,322 18-May-10 Picture Butte 1,658 10-May-10 Pincher Creek 3,712 13-May-08 Ponoka 6,576 16-May-06 Provost 2,078 16-Jun-05 Rainbow Lake 1,082 01-Jun-07 September 15, 2010 Page 4 of 11 2010 MUNICIPAL FEDERAL MUNICIPALITY POPULATION CENSUS DATE CENSUS DATE TOWNS continued . Raymond 3,868 03-May-10 Redcliff 5,096 16-May-06 Redwater 2,192 16-May-06 Rimbey 2,496 01-May-08 Rocky Mountain House 7,231 15-Jun-07 Sedgewick 891 16-May-06 Sexsmith 2,255 10-Apr-07 Slave Lake 7,031 01-May-07 Smoky Lake 1,010 16-May-06 Spirit River 1,148 16-May-06 St. Paul 5,632 15-May-10 Stavely 497 01-Jun-07 Stettler 5,843 26-May-08 Stony Plain 14,177 15-Apr-10 Strathmore 12,139 01-May-10 Sundre 2,518 16-May-06 Swan Hills 1,858 20-May-08 Sylvan Lake 11,115 14-Apr-08 Taber 7,821 02-Jun-08 Three Hills 3,322 21-Apr-08 Tofield 1,876 16-May-06 Trochu 1,113 26-Jun-09 Turner Valley 2,022 20-May-08 Two Hills 1,232 07-May-07 Valleyview 1,884 01-May-07 Vauxhall 1,069 16-May-06 Vegreville 5,834 01-Apr-09 Vermilion 4,472 01-Apr-07 Viking 1,085 16-May-06 Vulcan 1,940 16-May-06 Wainwright 5,775 01-May-08 Wembley 1,443 16-May-06 Westlock 4,964 07-May-08 Whitecourt 9,202 05-May-08 Towns Total 441,647 VILLAGES (95) Acme 730 01-Jun-10 Alberta Beach 884 16-May-06 Alix 851 16-May-06 Alliance 197 15-Jun-07 Amisk 172 16-May-06 Andrew 465 16-May-06 Arrowwood 224 01-Jun-07 September 15, 2010 Page 5 of 11 2010 MUNICIPAL FEDERAL MUNICIPALITY POPULATION CENSUS DATE CENSUS DATE VILLAGES continued .
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Shoestring Ranch Recognized for Environmental
    2018 WINTER management, but once they switched to SHOESTRING RANCH focus more on the soil, everything came together. The ranch practices minimum tillage when seeding crops to keep residue RECOGNIZED FOR anchored in the soil and protect the structure to prevent erosion. ENVIRONMENTAL “We try to take an environmental focus on PAGE 2 all the decisions that we do here at the NEW BEGINNINGS STEWARDSHIP ranch, and try to include it in all of our management steps,” said Ian. “We have PAGE 3 Alberta Beef Producers (ABP) presented tried to work with nature as much as we RISKS AND REWARDS Ian and Carman Murray with the 2018 can and we’ve changed the management of Environmental Stewardship Award at the our ranch dramatically to do so.” PAGE 4 ABP Annual General Meeting in December. Dugouts are fenced off with several solar Each year, ABP recognizes a cattle NOW’S THE TIME TO power watering systems to provide better operation that demonstrates leadership CONNECT WITH YOUR VET quality water for the cattle and support in environmental stewardship – one that healthy riparian areas. Shelterbelts are PAGE 5 contributes to the land while improving maintained to protect from wind erosion productivity and profitability. REVAMPING EDUCATION and provide wildlife habitat. PAGE 6 Ian is a fifth-generation Alberta rancher “I’d like to continue to improve upon the whose family originally homesteaded INCENTIVISING ECOSYSTEM utilization of our land, our production, our in 1883, west of Calgary in the Jumping SERVICES cattle and pastures. I’d like to continue to Pound District. In 2007, Ian and Carman improve the health of our soil PAGE 7 moved from north of Cochrane to and the cleanliness of our water,” said Ian.
    [Show full text]
  • Municipal Guide
    Municipal Guide Planning for a Healthy and Sustainable North Saskatchewan River Watershed Cover photos: Billie Hilholland From top to bottom: Abraham Lake An agricultural field alongside Highway 598 North Saskatchewan River flowing through the City of Edmonton Book design and layout by Gwen Edge Municipal Guide: Planning for a Healthy and Sustainable North Saskatchewan River Watershed prepared for the North Saskatchewan Watershed Alliance by Giselle Beaudry Acknowledgements The North Saskatchewan Watershed Alliance would like to thank the following for their generous contributions to this Municipal Guide through grants and inkind support. ii Municipal Guide: Planning for a Healthy and Sustainable North Saskatchewan Watershed Acknowledgements The North Saskatchewan Watershed Alliance would like to thank the following individuals who dedicated many hours to the Municipal Guide project. Their voluntary contributions in the development of this guide are greatly appreciated. Municipal Guide Steering Committee Andrew Schoepf, Alberta Environment Bill Symonds, Alberta Municipal Affairs David Curran, Alberta Environment Delaney Anderson, St. Paul & Smoky Lake Counties Doug Thrussell, Alberta Environment Gabrielle Kosmider, Fisheries and Oceans Canada George Turk, Councillor, Lac Ste. Anne County Graham Beck, Leduc County and City of Edmonton Irvin Frank, Councillor, Camrose County Jolee Gillies,Town of Devon Kim Nielsen, Clearwater County Lorraine Sawdon, Fisheries and Oceans Canada Lyndsay Waddingham, Alberta Municipal Affairs Murray Klutz, Ducks
    [Show full text]
  • Annual Report 2014 04 10 12 14 Corporate Overview Board Chair & Ceo Messages 2014 Highlights Our Operations
    ANNUAL REPORT 2014 04 10 12 14 CORPORATE OVERVIEW BOARD CHAIR & CEO MESSAGES 2014 HIGHLIGHTS OUR OPERATIONS 02 2014 ANNUAL REPORT 24 28 30 32 ECO CENTRE AWARD OUR COMMUNITIES OUR PEOPLE FINANCIAL OVERVIEW 03 WHO WE ARE Aquatera is a full-service utility corporation – the provider of choice for governments, businesses and communities. Our business is to provide high-quality utility services and optimize value to consumers, the environment, and shareholders. WHAT WE DO • We provide safe drinking water for community health. • We provide utility services that foster regional prosperity. • We are stewards of air, land and water. VISION To be the most innovative municipal company in Canada by 2020. By 2020, we will: • Generate $25 million in cash flow • Be below the median Alberta utility rate • Double our dividends to shareholders • Enhance the public trust by prudently managing company risks 04 2014 ANNUAL REPORT OUR PRINCIPLES All Aquatera employees endorse and commit to exemplifying the following principles that have been established by our board. These principles will guide our actions and ensure our success: • Be an exemplary employer • Provide first class customer service • Model environmental stewardship • Expand markets within the bounds of a • Ensure an appropriate balance between profitability sound business approach and affordability • Communicate to enhance understanding, • Innovate and lead in the development of best practices acceptance and support 05 CORE VALUES We commit to the following Core Values, which guide our day-to-day operations and our interactions with our customers, partners, suppliers and each other. QUALITY RESPECT We provide quality customer service by: We are environmental stewards, always meeting and • doing the right job right the first time striving to exceed environmental standards while • demonstrating pride in our work seeking to minimize the environmental impact of • always meeting our standards our services.
    [Show full text]
  • Communities Within Rural Municipal
    Communities Within Specialized and Rural Municipalities Updated December 31, 2013 Municipal Services Branch 17th Floor Commerce Place 10155 - 102 Street Edmonton, Alberta T5J 4L4 Phone: 780-427-2225 Fax: 780-420-1016 E-mail: [email protected] COMMUNITIES WITHIN SPECIALIZED AND RURAL MUNICIPAL BOUNDARIES COMMUNITY STATUS MUNICIPALITY Abee Hamlet Thorhild County Acadia Valley Hamlet Municipal District of Acadia No. 34 ACME Village Kneehill County Aetna Hamlet Cardston County ALBERTA BEACH Village Lac Ste. Anne County Alcomdale Hamlet Sturgeon County Alder Flats Hamlet County of Wetaskiwin No. 10 Aldersyde Hamlet Municipal District of Foothills No. 31 Alhambra Hamlet Clearwater County ALIX Village Lacombe County ALLIANCE Village Flagstaff County Altario Hamlet Special Areas Board AMISK Village Municipal District of Provost No. 52 ANDREW Village Lamont County Antler Lake Hamlet Strathcona County Anzac Hamlet Regional Municipality of Wood Buffalo Ardley Hamlet Red Deer County Ardmore Hamlet Municipal District of Bonnyville No. 87 Ardrossan Hamlet Strathcona County ARGENTIA BEACH Summer Village County of Wetaskiwin No. 10 Armena Hamlet Camrose County ARROWWOOD Village Vulcan County Ashmont Hamlet County of St. Paul No. 19 ATHABASCA Town Athabasca County Atmore Hamlet Athabasca County Balzac Hamlet Rocky View County BANFF Town Improvement District No. 09 (Banff) BARNWELL Village Municipal District of Taber BARONS Village Lethbridge County BARRHEAD Town County of Barrhead No. 11 BASHAW Town Camrose County BASSANO Town County of Newell BAWLF Village Camrose County BEAUMONT Town Leduc County Beauvallon Hamlet County of Two Hills No. 21 Beaver Crossing Hamlet Municipal District of Bonnyville No. 87 Beaver Lake Hamlet Lac La Biche County Beaver Mines Hamlet Municipal District of Pincher Creek No.
    [Show full text]
  • 2018 Municipal Codes
    2018 Municipal Codes Updated November 23, 2018 Municipal Services Branch 17th Floor Commerce Place 10155 - 102 Street Edmonton, Alberta T5J 4L4 Phone: 780-427-2225 Fax: 780-420-1016 E-mail: [email protected] 2018 MUNICIPAL CHANGES STATUS / NAME CHANGES: 4353-Effective January 1, 2018 Lac La Biche County became the Specialized Municipality of Lac La Biche County. 0236-Effective February 28, 2018 Village of Nobleford became the Town of Nobleford. AMALGAMATED: FORMATIONS: 6619- Effective April 10, 2018 Bonnyville Regional Water Services Commission formed as a Regional service commission. 6618- Effective April 10, 2018 South Pigeon Lake Regional Wastewater Services Commission formed as a Regional service commission. DISSOLVED: CODE NUMBERS RESERVED: 4737 Capital Region Board 0524 R.M. of Brittania (Sask.) 0462 Townsite of Redwood Meadows 5284 Calgary Regional Partnership STATUS CODES: 01 Cities (18)* 15 Hamlet & Urban Services Areas (396) 09 Specialized Municipalities (6) 20 Services Commissions (73) 06 Municipal Districts (63) 25 First Nations (52) 02 Towns (109) 26 Indian Reserves (138) 03 Villages (86) 50 Local Government Associations (22) 04 Summer Villages (51) 60 Emergency Districts (12) 07 Improvement Districts (8) 98 Reserved Codes (4) 08 Special Areas (4) 11 Metis Settlements (8) * (Includes Lloydminster) November 23, 2018 Page 1 of 14 CITIES CODE CITIES CODE NO. NO. Airdrie 0003 Brooks 0043 Calgary 0046 Camrose 0048 Chestermere 0356 Cold Lake 0525 Edmonton 0098 Fort Saskatchewan 0117 Grande Prairie 0132 Lacombe 0194 Leduc 0200 Lethbridge 0203 Lloydminster* 0206 Medicine Hat 0217 Red Deer 0262 Spruce Grove 0291 St. Albert 0292 Wetaskiwin 0347 *Alberta only SPECIALIZED MUNICIPALITY CODE SPECIALIZED MUNICIPALITY CODE NO.
    [Show full text]
  • Edmonton Region External Truck Commodity Survey Commodity Origin / Destination by Locality – Weekday 24 Hour Daily
    EDMONTON REGION EXTERNAL TRUCK/COMMODITY SURVEY Published: July, 2003 Revised: July, 2004 EDMONTON REGION EXTERNAL TRUCK/COMMODITY SURVEY REPORT AND RESULTS Prepared by: Meheboob Ishani, P.Eng July 2003 SYNOPSIS In the fall of 2001, Alberta Transportation and the City of Edmonton undertook an External Truck/Commodity Survey to allow them to study the movement of commercial goods by the truck mode into and out of the Edmonton Region. The survey was structured similar to the survey undertaken by the City of Calgary in 2000. The intent of the study is to provide planners with information to assess the transportation needs of both Alberta Transportation and the City of Edmonton. Roadside interviews were conducted between September and November 2001 at 24 sites on provincial highways entering the study area (Exhibit 1.2.1 Section 1.2) between the hours of 8:00 AM and 4:00 PM. In all just, over 6,500 truckers transporting commodities into and out of the Edmonton Region were interviewed entering and exiting the region on various provincial highways. The information gathered from the survey was scaled up to represent daily truck and commodity movement into and out of the study area. Findings of the study indicate: D Almost 16,000 trucks enter or exit the region on a typical weekday on a 24-hour basis; D Approximately 16,200 Commodity trips are made on a typical weekday on a 24- hour basis; D The highways that carry the majority of the trips into and out of the region include Highway 2 South (20%), Highway 16W (13%), Highway 43 (10%), Highway
    [Show full text]
  • Communities Within Specialized and Rural Municipalities (May 2019)
    Communities Within Specialized and Rural Municipalities Updated May 24, 2019 Municipal Services Branch 17th Floor Commerce Place 10155 - 102 Street Edmonton, Alberta T5J 4L4 Phone: 780-427-2225 Fax: 780-420-1016 E-mail: [email protected] COMMUNITIES WITHIN SPECIALIZED AND RURAL MUNICIPAL BOUNDARIES COMMUNITY STATUS MUNICIPALITY Abee Hamlet Thorhild County Acadia Valley Hamlet Municipal District of Acadia No. 34 ACME Village Kneehill County Aetna Hamlet Cardston County ALBERTA BEACH Village Lac Ste. Anne County Alcomdale Hamlet Sturgeon County Alder Flats Hamlet County of Wetaskiwin No. 10 Aldersyde Hamlet Foothills County Alhambra Hamlet Clearwater County ALIX Village Lacombe County ALLIANCE Village Flagstaff County Altario Hamlet Special Areas Board AMISK Village Municipal District of Provost No. 52 ANDREW Village Lamont County Antler Lake Hamlet Strathcona County Anzac Hamlet Regional Municipality of Wood Buffalo Ardley Hamlet Red Deer County Ardmore Hamlet Municipal District of Bonnyville No. 87 Ardrossan Hamlet Strathcona County ARGENTIA BEACH Summer Village County of Wetaskiwin No. 10 Armena Hamlet Camrose County ARROWWOOD Village Vulcan County Ashmont Hamlet County of St. Paul No. 19 ATHABASCA Town Athabasca County Atmore Hamlet Athabasca County Balzac Hamlet Rocky View County BANFF Town Improvement District No. 09 (Banff) BARNWELL Village Municipal District of Taber BARONS Village Lethbridge County BARRHEAD Town County of Barrhead No. 11 BASHAW Town Camrose County BASSANO Town County of Newell BAWLF Village Camrose County Beauvallon Hamlet County of Two Hills No. 21 Beaver Crossing Hamlet Municipal District of Bonnyville No. 87 Beaver Lake Hamlet Lac La Biche County Beaver Mines Hamlet Municipal District of Pincher Creek No. 9 Beaverdam Hamlet Municipal District of Bonnyville No.
    [Show full text]
  • AREA Housing Statistics by Economic Region AREA Housing Statistics by Economic Region
    AREA Housing Statistics by Economic Region AREA Housing Statistics by Economic Region AREA Chief Economist https://albertare.configio.com/page/ann-marie-lurie-bioAnn-Marie Lurie analyzes Alberta’s resale housing statistics both provincially and regionally. In order to allow for better analysis of housing sales data, we have aligned our reporting regions to the census divisions used by Statistics Canada. Economic Region AB-NW: Athabasca – Grande Prairie – Peace River 17 16 Economic Region AB-NE: Wood Buffalo – Cold Lake Economic Region AB-W: 19 Banff – Jasper – Rocky Mountain House 18 12 Economic Region AB-Edmonton 13 14 Economic Region AB-Red Deer 11 10 Economic Region AB-E: 9 8 7 Camrose – Drumheller 15 6 4 5 Economic Region AB-Calgary Economic Region AB-S: 2 1 3 Lethbridge – Medicine Hat New reports are released on the sixth of each month, except on weekends or holidays when it is released on the following business day. AREA Housing Statistics by Economic Region 1 Alberta Economic Region North West Grande Prairie – Athabasca – Peace River Division 17 Municipal District Towns Hamlets, villages, Other Big Lakes County - 0506 High Prairie - 0147 Enilda (0694), Faust (0702), Grouard Swan Hills - 0309 (0719), Joussard (0742), Kinuso (0189), Rural Big Lakes County (9506) Clear Hills – 0504 Cleardale (0664), Worsley (0884), Hines Creek (0150), Rural Big Lakes county (9504) Lesser Slave River no 124 - Slave Lake - 0284 Canyon Creek (0898), Chisholm (0661), 0507 Flatbush (0705), Marten Beach (0780), Smith (0839), Wagner (0649), Widewater (0899), Slave Lake (0284), Rural Slave River (9507) Northern Lights County - Manning – 0212 Deadwood (0679), Dixonville (0684), 0511 North Star (0892), Notikewin (0893), Rural Northern Lights County (9511) Northern Sunrise County - Cadotte Lake (0645), Little Buffalo 0496 (0762), Marie Reine (0777), Reno (0814), St.
    [Show full text]
  • Financial Indicator Graphs 2017
    2017 Financial Indicator Graphs Generated for: FLAGSTAFF COUNTY Financial Indicator Graphs Introduction The financial indicator graphs are intended to serve as a tool that may assist council and administration with operational decisions. The comparative measures may be useful in assessing past performance and for budget planning. Each municipality is compared to a group of similar size urban municipalities, or to rural municipalities with similar tax base. The comparison group is shown on the last slide. Custom graphs can be created comparing your municipality to other Alberta municipalities. Financial Advisory Services is available to assist you in interpreting the information contained in the graphs. Please be aware that advisors will not have access to any of the custom graphs you create, but would still be able to assist with the underlying formulas and data used to create all graphs. It should be noted that that the financial indicator graphs are point-in-time documents. The system is updated daily as new information is added to the municipal financial database. As such graphs will reflect the current data set and the results will be subject to change as the database is updated and verified. However, most information from the previous reporting year will have been posted by the fall of the subsequent year. Other points to note are: - The range for most of the graphs is 2012 to 2017. - Caution should be used when interpreting results as each municipality has unique characteristics affecting how it compares to the group. Also, circumstances
    [Show full text]
  • Of 5 Agricultural Service Board Athabasca County October 26, 2011 - 9:30 AM County Administration Office
    Agricultural Service Board Athabasca County October 26, 2011 - 9:30 AM County Administration Office PRESENT: Chairman Kevin Haines; Members Allen Balay, Denis Willcott, Doris Splane, Christi Bilsky, David Yurdiga, Jack Dowhaluk, and Larry Armfelt; Director Ron Jackson; Farm Production Specialist Trent Keller; County Manager Gary Buchanan; and Recording Secretary Roxanne Senyk. ABSENT: Member Mike Demko CALL TO ORDER: Chairman Haines called the meeting to order at 9:34 a.m. APPROVAL OF AGENDA: Resolution Moved by Member Balay to accept the agenda with the addition, as ASB 11-118 presented: 6.4 Sale of Shed Motion Carried. APPROVAL OF MINUTES: Resolution Moved by Member Dowhaluk to approve the minutes of the meeting from ASB 11-119 September 28, 2011. Motion Carried. BUSINESS ARISING FROM THE MINUTES: NW Regional Conference - Review Mr. Jackson reviewed the presentations from the regional conference hosted in Parkland County on October 24th. Discussions were held regarding bounty on wild boars; ALUS (alternative land use strategies); use of the subdivision process to complete property weed inspections (as done in Parkland County); along with the direction of investigating the purchase of a wet blade mowing system to control weeds. It was noted that County of Thorhild will host the northwest regional conference next year. Alberta Environment Meeting - Dapp Creek Information was shared with Members regarding the meeting attended by Mr. Jackson with Alberta Environment, Westlock County, and Ducks Unlimited. Discussion was held about the cost of maintenance on Dapp Creek along with funding of maintenance on water resource projects. Alberta Environment noted that Athabasca County was the only Chairman Agricultural Fieldman Page 1 of 5 Agricultural Service Board Athabasca County October 26, 2011 - 9:30 AM County Administration Office municipality that had received funding for maintenance of these projects and indicated that an increased tax assessment on improved lands could theoretically be used to fund these maintenance projects.
    [Show full text]
  • OVERVIEW Group at Stopping House Enroute to Athabasca Edmonton from Landing Courtesy NA-2788-2 Archives Glenbow of The
    Historic Athabasca Landing Trail AN OVERVIEW Group at Stopping House enroute to Athabasca Edmonton from Landing courtesy NA-2788-2 Archives Glenbow of the ii iv Stantec Consulting Ltd. Introduction The historic Athabasca Landing Trail (ALT) was the first overland route between Fort Edmonton and the southern loop of the Athabasca River known as Athabasca Landing. The trail played a major role in the transportation of goods and services between Edmonton and Athabasca Landing in the late 1800s and early 1900s and was an important corridor for the settlement of the region. Many portions of the historic route are still in use as rural roads, and some portions are being used as recreation trails. Other portions have been abandoned. The ALT is recognized as a significant recreation, tourism, and heritage amenity and is registered as part of the Trans Canada Trail (TCT). The TCT route follows the historic route where possible and utilizes other county roads and undeveloped road allowances where use of the historic route is not feasible. The ALT is a key component of the TCT, linking the east- west land route with the northern land and water routes, as shown by the yellow circle in the figure below. Local trail groups have been working for years on revitalizing sections of the trail and recreating a continuous corridor for the ALT. The ALT steering committee was formed in 2008 to guide preparation of a conceptual master plan for the ALT corridor. Its mission statement is: “ . to promote and support the development of the Athabasca Landing Trail, a continuous, non-motorized recreational trail that follows the historic route from Fort Saskatchewan north to Athabasca, and links to other trail systems in Alberta and Canada.” Stuck on the Landing the on Stuck Trail - courtesy Provincial of Alberta/B5682 Archives Historic Athabasca Landing Trail 1 A tha bas ca R iver Athabasca ATHABASCA TRAIL first 100 Landing surveyed by HBC in 1877 (HBC 1875) by Dominion in 1879/80 Kinnoull KINNOULL: named after theScottish home of D.
    [Show full text]
  • Infrastructuremasterplan Sturge
    Corporate Authorization This document entitled “Sturgeon County Infrastructure Master Plan” has been prepared by ISL Engineering and Land Services Ltd. (ISL) for the use of Sturgeon County. The information and data provided herein represent ISL’s professional judgment at the time of preparation. ISL denies any liability whatsoever to any other parties who may obtain this report and use it, or any of its contents, without prior written consent from ISL. Barry Raynard, M.Eng., P.Eng. Daniel Zeggelaar, P.Eng., PTOE Manager, Municipal/Water Resources Engineering Project Manager – Transportation islengineering.com Sturgeon County Infrastructure Master Plan July 2019 Sturgeon County – Report i FINAL Council endorsed Sturgeon County's Infrastructure Master Plan to be used as a key infrastructure planning input for the community. Motion 338/19 September 10th, 2019 Table of Contents 1.0 Introduction .................................................................................................................. 1 1.1 Background 2 1.2 Study Purpose 2 1.3 Terminology 2 2.0 Methodology ................................................................................................................ 4 2.1 Project Management Approach 5 2.2 Data Collection 5 2.3 Trends / Growth Projections 5 2.4 Existing Infrastructure Analysis 5 2.5 Future Infrastructure Analysis 6 2.6 Implementation Strategy 6 2.7 Performance Indicators 7 3.0 Trends and Growth Projections .................................................................................... 8 3.1 Introduction
    [Show full text]