DOCSLIB.ORG

Financial Indicator Graphs 2017

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Financial Indicator Graphs 2017 2017 Financial Indicator Graphs Generated for: FLAGSTAFF COUNTY Financial Indicator Graphs Introduction The financial indicator graphs are intended to serve as a tool that may assist council and administration with operational decisions. The comparative measures may be useful in assessing past performance and for budget planning. Each municipality is compared to a group of similar size urban municipalities, or to rural municipalities with similar tax base. The comparison group is shown on the last slide. Custom graphs can be created comparing your municipality to other Alberta municipalities. Financial Advisory Services is available to assist you in interpreting the information contained in the graphs. Please be aware that advisors will not have access to any of the custom graphs you create, but would still be able to assist with the underlying formulas and data used to create all graphs. It should be noted that that the financial indicator graphs are point-in-time documents. The system is updated daily as new information is added to the municipal financial database. As such graphs will reflect the current data set and the results will be subject to change as the database is updated and verified. However, most information from the previous reporting year will have been posted by the fall of the subsequent year. Other points to note are: - The range for most of the graphs is 2012 to 2017. - Caution should be used when interpreting results as each municipality has unique characteristics affecting how it compares to the group. Also, circumstances may have changed since the December 31, 2017 reporting date. Financial Indicator Graphs Introduction Financial Indicator Graphs include: o Equalized Tax Rates - Municipal/Residential/Non-Residential o Equalized Assessment Per Kilometer of Road o Non-Residential Equalized Assessment as % of Total o Tax Collection Rate o Debt & Debt Service as % of the Limits o Long Term Debt Per Capita o Major Revenue Sources Per Capita o Major Revenue Sources As % of Total Revenue (only 2017) o Broad Function Expenses Per Capita (only 2017) o Per Capita Expenses by Major Type: - Salaries, Wages & Benefits - Contracted & General Services - Materials, Goods, Supplies & Utilities - Bank Charges & Interest - Amortization o Net Book Value As % of Capital Costs o Accumulated Surplus Categories, As % (only 2017) o Accumulated Surplus Categories, Per Capita (only 2017) o Ratio of Current Assets to Current Liabilities Financial Indicator Graphs FLAGSTAFF COUNTY Equalized Tax Rates: Net Municipal FLAGSTAFF COUNTY Median Range 15 14.6 14.4 14.4 14.0 2012 13.1% 9.9% 13.5 13.1 2013 13.5% 10.1% 2014 14.0% 9.6% 2015 14.6% 10.6% 2016 14.4% 10.6% 2017 14.4% 10.4% 10 5 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 Note: Municipal Equalized Tax Rate is calculated based on total equalized assessment and net municipal property tax. Created on: May 21, 2019 05:14 Page 1 Financial Indicator Graphs FLAGSTAFF COUNTY Equalized Tax Rates: Residential FLAGSTAFF COUNTY Median Range 15 2012 11.5% 8.1% 2013 11.8% 8.5% 11.8 12.0 11.5 11.7 11.5 11.6 2014 11.7% 8.1% 2015 12.0% 8.6% 10 2016 11.5% 8.7% 2017 11.6% 8.8% 5 0 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 Note: Residential Equalized Tax Rate is calculated based on gross residential property taxes and residential equalized assessment. Created on: May 21, 2019 05:14 Page 2 Financial Indicator Graphs FLAGSTAFF COUNTY Equalized Tax Rates: Non-Residential FLAGSTAFF COUNTY Median Range 30 2012 17.9% 16.7% 2013 18.5% 16.4% 2014 19.2% 16.8% 20.1 19.7 20.1 2015 20.1% 17.3% 20 19.2 18.5 2016 19.7% 17.9% 17.9 2017 20.1% 18.1% 10 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 Note: Non-Residential Equalized Tax Rate is calculated based on gross non-residential property taxes and non-residential equalized assessment Created on: May 21, 2019 05:14 Page 3 Financial Indicator Graphs FLAGSTAFF COUNTY Total Equalized Assessment Per KM of Roads FLAGSTAFF COUNTY Median 10,000,000 Range 8,000,000 2012 479,428 576,960 2013 491,138 587,655 2014 505,056 610,157 6,000,000 2015 519,298 641,213 2016 523,579 649,161 2017 569,937 626,788 4,000,000 2,000,000 479,428 491,138 505,056 519,298 523,579 569,937 0 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 Created on: May 21, 2019 05:14 Page 4 Financial Indicator Graphs FLAGSTAFF COUNTY Non-Residential Assessment as % of Total Equalized Assessment FLAGSTAFF COUNTY Median Range 80 2012 70.5% 58.5% 70.5 70.6 69.9 69.1 68.0 68.3 2013 70.6% 58.5% 2014 69.9% 57.6% 2015 69.1% 56.8% 60 2016 68.0% 56.3% 2017 68.3% 53.1% 40 20 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 Created on: May 21, 2019 05:14 Page 5 Financial Indicator Graphs FLAGSTAFF COUNTY Tax Collection Rates FLAGSTAFF COUNTY Median 100 Range 98.2 97.3 97.1 97.0 96.9 2012 98.2% 97.7% 96.5 2013 96.5% 97.6% 2014 97.3% 98.1% 95 2015 97.1% 97.3% 2016 96.9% 96.9% 2017 97.0% 96.1% 90 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 Note: This indicator reflects the percentage of taxes and grants in place of taxes which are collected by the municipality in the year in which they are levied. Created on: May 21, 2019 05:14 Page 6 Financial Indicator Graphs FLAGSTAFF COUNTY Percent of Debt Limit Used FLAGSTAFF COUNTY Median Range 60 2012 0.1% 16.6% 2013 0.2% 15.6% 2014 0.1% 13.7% 2015 0.1% 12.4% 40 2016 0.4% 13.0% 2017 11.4% 17.2% 20 11.4 0.1 0.2 0.1 0.1 0.4 0 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 Note: This graph shows, in percentage terms, the municipality's debt as a percentage of the regulated limit. This is compared to the median for the group of similar municipalities. Created on: May 21, 2019 05:14 Page 7 Financial Indicator Graphs FLAGSTAFF COUNTY Percent of Debt Service Limit Used FLAGSTAFF COUNTY 60 Median Range 2012 0.6% 9.7% 40 2013 0.4% 10.7% 2014 0.3% 12.2% 2015 0.2% 11.0% 2016 0.8% 11.8% 2017 15.0% 14.0% 20 15.0 0.6 0.4 0.3 0.2 0.8 0 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 Note: This graph shows, in percentage terms, the municipality's current debt servicing requirement relative to the regulated limit. This is compared to the median for the group of similar municipalities. Created on: May 21, 2019 05:14 Page 8 Financial Indicator Graphs FLAGSTAFF COUNTY Long Term Municipal Debt Per Capita FLAGSTAFF COUNTY 5,000 Median Range 4,000 2012 9 682 2013 20 725 3,000 2014 15 633 2015 9 614 2016 44 809 2017 1,099 969 2,000 1,099 1,000 9 20 15 9 44 0 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 Created on: May 21, 2019 05:14 Page 9 Financial Indicator Graphs FLAGSTAFF COUNTY Revenue Sources Per Capita: Net Municipal Property Taxes FLAGSTAFF COUNTY 8,000 Median Range 6,409 6,267 6,098 2012 5,406 2,875 6,000 5,744 5,696 2013 5,744 3,054 5,406 2014 6,098 3,040 2015 6,409 3,457 2016 6,267 3,766 2017 5,696 3,679 4,000 2,000 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 Created on: May 21, 2019 05:14 Page 10 Financial Indicator Graphs FLAGSTAFF COUNTY Revenue Sources Per Capita: Total Grants FLAGSTAFF COUNTY Median Range 8,000 2012 1,137 909 2013 864 1,139 6,000 2014 433 643 2015 294 821 2016 773 848 2017 1,644 789 4,000 2,000 1,644 1,137 864 773 433 294 0 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 Created on: May 21, 2019 05:14 Page 11 Financial Indicator Graphs FLAGSTAFF COUNTY Revenue Sources Per Capita: Sales and User Charges FLAGSTAFF COUNTY Median Range 1,000 2012 90 208 2013 280 224 2014 233 228 2015 199 232 2016 260 222 2017 259 205 500 280 260 259 233 199 90 0 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 Created on: May 21, 2019 05:14 Page 12 Financial Indicator Graphs FLAGSTAFF COUNTY Major Revenue Sources As % of Total Revenue, 2017 FLAGSTAFF COUNTY Group Median Group Maximum 85 80 72 65 60 40 32 21 21 20 18 5 3 0 Net Municipal Property Tax Total Grants Sales and User Charges Created on: May 21, 2019 05:14 Page 13 Financial Indicator Graphs FLAGSTAFF COUNTY Major Expenditures Per Capita by Broad Function, 2017 FLAGSTAFF COUNTY Group Median 8,000 Group Maximum 7,595 6,000 5,887 4,873 4,734 4,000 3,543 2,501 2,411 2,000 1,663 851 634 689 696 308 319 303 196 193 169 0 General Government Protective Services Transportation Environment Recreation Total Created on: May 21, 2019 05:14 Page 14 Financial Indicator Graphs FLAGSTAFF COUNTY Major Expenditures Per Capita by Type: Salaries, Wages and Benefits FLAGSTAFF COUNTY Median Range 2,500 2,197 2,156 2012 1,893 1,038 2,061 2,052 2,020 2013 2,052 1,150 2,000 1,893 2014 2,156 1,204 2015 2,197 1,236 2016 2,061 1,345 2017 2,020 1,279 1,500 1,000 500 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 Created on: May 21, 2019 05:14 Page 15 Financial Indicator Graphs FLAGSTAFF COUNTY Major Expenditures Per Capita by Type: Contracted and General Services FLAGSTAFF COUNTY Median Range 6,000 2012 579 595 2013 795 795 2014 716 645 2015 804 804 4,000 2016 886 723 2017 744 674 2,000 886 795 716 804 744 579 0 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 Created on: May 21, 2019 05:14 Page 16 Financial Indicator Graphs FLAGSTAFF COUNTY Major Expenditures Per Capita by Type: Materials, Goods, Supplies and Utilities FLAGSTAFF COUNTY 2,500 Median Range 2,000 2012 961 589 2013 1,286 538 1,500 2014 1,240 563 1,286 1,311 2015 1,259 635 1,240 1,259 2016 1,099 551 1,099 2017 1,311 584 961 1,000 500 0 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 Created on: May 21, 2019 05:14 Page 17 Financial Indicator Graphs FLAGSTAFF COUNTY Major Expenditures Per Capita by Type: Interest and Banking FLAGSTAFF COUNTY Median Range 150 2012 0 12 2013 1 15 2014 1 32 2015 0 27 100 2016 0 26 2017 1 25 50 0 1 1 0 0 1 0 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 Created on: May 21, 2019 05:14 Page 18 Financial Indicator Graphs FLAGSTAFF COUNTY Major Expenditures Per Capita by Type: Amortization of Tangible Capital Assets FLAGSTAFF COUNTY Median 2,500 Range 2,000 2012 1,111 668 2013 1,149 752 2014 1,200 906 2015 1,214 799 1,500 2016 1,250
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Shoestring Ranch Recognized for Environmental
    2018 WINTER management, but once they switched to SHOESTRING RANCH focus more on the soil, everything came together. The ranch practices minimum tillage when seeding crops to keep residue RECOGNIZED FOR anchored in the soil and protect the structure to prevent erosion. ENVIRONMENTAL “We try to take an environmental focus on PAGE 2 all the decisions that we do here at the NEW BEGINNINGS STEWARDSHIP ranch, and try to include it in all of our management steps,” said Ian. “We have PAGE 3 Alberta Beef Producers (ABP) presented tried to work with nature as much as we RISKS AND REWARDS Ian and Carman Murray with the 2018 can and we’ve changed the management of Environmental Stewardship Award at the our ranch dramatically to do so.” PAGE 4 ABP Annual General Meeting in December. Dugouts are fenced off with several solar Each year, ABP recognizes a cattle NOW’S THE TIME TO power watering systems to provide better operation that demonstrates leadership CONNECT WITH YOUR VET quality water for the cattle and support in environmental stewardship – one that healthy riparian areas. Shelterbelts are PAGE 5 contributes to the land while improving maintained to protect from wind erosion productivity and profitability. REVAMPING EDUCATION and provide wildlife habitat. PAGE 6 Ian is a fifth-generation Alberta rancher “I’d like to continue to improve upon the whose family originally homesteaded INCENTIVISING ECOSYSTEM utilization of our land, our production, our in 1883, west of Calgary in the Jumping SERVICES cattle and pastures. I’d like to continue to Pound District. In 2007, Ian and Carman improve the health of our soil PAGE 7 moved from north of Cochrane to and the cleanliness of our water,” said Ian.
    [Show full text]
  • Municipal Guide
    Municipal Guide Planning for a Healthy and Sustainable North Saskatchewan River Watershed Cover photos: Billie Hilholland From top to bottom: Abraham Lake An agricultural field alongside Highway 598 North Saskatchewan River flowing through the City of Edmonton Book design and layout by Gwen Edge Municipal Guide: Planning for a Healthy and Sustainable North Saskatchewan River Watershed prepared for the North Saskatchewan Watershed Alliance by Giselle Beaudry Acknowledgements The North Saskatchewan Watershed Alliance would like to thank the following for their generous contributions to this Municipal Guide through grants and inkind support. ii Municipal Guide: Planning for a Healthy and Sustainable North Saskatchewan Watershed Acknowledgements The North Saskatchewan Watershed Alliance would like to thank the following individuals who dedicated many hours to the Municipal Guide project. Their voluntary contributions in the development of this guide are greatly appreciated. Municipal Guide Steering Committee Andrew Schoepf, Alberta Environment Bill Symonds, Alberta Municipal Affairs David Curran, Alberta Environment Delaney Anderson, St. Paul & Smoky Lake Counties Doug Thrussell, Alberta Environment Gabrielle Kosmider, Fisheries and Oceans Canada George Turk, Councillor, Lac Ste. Anne County Graham Beck, Leduc County and City of Edmonton Irvin Frank, Councillor, Camrose County Jolee Gillies,Town of Devon Kim Nielsen, Clearwater County Lorraine Sawdon, Fisheries and Oceans Canada Lyndsay Waddingham, Alberta Municipal Affairs Murray Klutz, Ducks
    [Show full text]
  • County of Stettler No. 06
    AAAF SPRING FORUM 2012 AGRICULTURAL FIELDMAN’S DIRECTORY –CURRENT TO April 25, 2012 SOUTH REGION M.D. of Acadia Rick Niwa (AF) Office: (403) 972-3808 Box 30, Acadia Valley Shop: (403) 972-3755 T0J 0A0 Fax: (403) 972-3833 Cell: (403) 664-7114 email [email protected] Cardston County Rod Foggin (AF) Ph: (403) 653-4977 Box 580, Cardston Stephen Bevans (AAF) Fax: (403) 653-1126 T0K 0K0 Cell: (403) 382-8236 (Rod) (403) 634-9474 email: [email protected] [email protected] Municipality of Crowsnest Pass Kim Lutz (AF) Ph: (403)-563-8658 Mail: email: [email protected] Box 600 Crowsnest Pass, AB T0K 0E0 Office: Room 1, MDM Community Center 2802 - 222 Street Bellevue, AB Cypress County Jason Storch (AF) Director Ph: (403) 526-2888 816 2nd Ave, Dunmore Christina Barrieau (AAF) Fax: (403) 526-8958 T1B 0K3 email : [email protected] [email protected] M.D. of Foothills Ron Stead (AF) Ph: (403) 603-5410 (Ron) Box 5605, High River Bree Webb (AAF) Shop: (403) 652-2423 (Bree) T1V 1M7 ext 5446 Fax : (403) 603-5414 email : [email protected] [email protected] County of Forty Mile Dave Matz (AF) Phone (403) 867-3530 Box 160, Foremost Vacant (AAF) fax (403) 867-2242 T0K 0X0 Kevin Jesske (Fieldman’s Asst.) cellular (403) 647-8080 (Dave) email [email protected] [email protected] Lethbridge County Don Bodnar (AF) Ph: (403) 328-5525 905-4th Ave. South Gary Secrist (AAF) shop: (403) 732-5333 Lethbridge T1J 4E4 Terry Mrozowich Fax: (403) 732-4328 Cell : (403) 634-0713 (Don) (403) 634-0680 (Gary) email : [email protected] [email protected] County of Newell Todd Green (AF) Office: (403) 362-2772 Box 130, Brooks Holly White (AAF/Rural Cons.
    [Show full text]
  • Annual Report 2014 04 10 12 14 Corporate Overview Board Chair & Ceo Messages 2014 Highlights Our Operations
    ANNUAL REPORT 2014 04 10 12 14 CORPORATE OVERVIEW BOARD CHAIR & CEO MESSAGES 2014 HIGHLIGHTS OUR OPERATIONS 02 2014 ANNUAL REPORT 24 28 30 32 ECO CENTRE AWARD OUR COMMUNITIES OUR PEOPLE FINANCIAL OVERVIEW 03 WHO WE ARE Aquatera is a full-service utility corporation – the provider of choice for governments, businesses and communities. Our business is to provide high-quality utility services and optimize value to consumers, the environment, and shareholders. WHAT WE DO • We provide safe drinking water for community health. • We provide utility services that foster regional prosperity. • We are stewards of air, land and water. VISION To be the most innovative municipal company in Canada by 2020. By 2020, we will: • Generate $25 million in cash flow • Be below the median Alberta utility rate • Double our dividends to shareholders • Enhance the public trust by prudently managing company risks 04 2014 ANNUAL REPORT OUR PRINCIPLES All Aquatera employees endorse and commit to exemplifying the following principles that have been established by our board. These principles will guide our actions and ensure our success: • Be an exemplary employer • Provide first class customer service • Model environmental stewardship • Expand markets within the bounds of a • Ensure an appropriate balance between profitability sound business approach and affordability • Communicate to enhance understanding, • Innovate and lead in the development of best practices acceptance and support 05 CORE VALUES We commit to the following Core Values, which guide our day-to-day operations and our interactions with our customers, partners, suppliers and each other. QUALITY RESPECT We provide quality customer service by: We are environmental stewards, always meeting and • doing the right job right the first time striving to exceed environmental standards while • demonstrating pride in our work seeking to minimize the environmental impact of • always meeting our standards our services.
    [Show full text]
  • Heartland Pipeline Project
    Heartland Pipeline Project Appendix A Project Overview Map October 2013 Heartland Pipeline GP Ltd. Appendix A Heartland Pipeline Project Project Overview Map Redwater St. Paul Smoky Lake County Saddle Lake No. 125 Upper 57 Thérien 855 Lower Sturgeon County 831 À¿ 57 À¿ Thérien Lake 38 B 45 Andrew ¤£ e ¤£ a Lake v 643 e 646 À¿ r À¿ h 45 45 36 i ¤£ ¤£ ¤£ Elk Point 56 ll À¿645 Lac County of St. Paul No. 19 830 C À¿ re 56 Santé ek Whitford Willingdon Lead Pump Bruderheim Lake Gibbons Station Rail Crossing Lac (KP 0) Bellevue Lake Highway 15 Eliza D (!D Rail Crossing À¿637 £15 (!D Lamont À¿637 ¥ ¤ 55 55 KP 10 45 County of Two Hills No. 21 FORT KP 20 Lamont County ¤£ # SASKATCHEWAN # Two Hills KP 30 45 Valve Site #1 Chipman Watt ¤£ (KP 25.14) Lake À¿855 $ 54 831 À¿857 À¿830 À¿ KP 40 54 ¤£15 I.D. No. 13 Myrnam 870 Strathcona County Elk Island À¿ Tawayik # KP 50 EDMONTON Elk # Mundare 53 Lake Valve Site #2 Island (KP 50.23) 16 Plain 881 ¤£16 ¤£ National 53 À¿ !D Lake Park ( KP 60 Highway 16 À¿631 À¿631 À¿631 V e r KP 70 m 52 36 i ¤£ lio Vegreville n 52 R i v 834 e À¿ 855 Valve Site #3 (KP 81.93) r À¿ KP 80 630 Beaverhill # À¿ # # Lake (!D# Lavoy Vermilion River Valve Site #4 (KP 83.39) County of Minburn No. 27 51 KP 90 Hastings 51 Cooking 14 857 ¤£ Lake À¿ Lake Booster Pump Station (KP 97.89) 14 Innisfree ¤£ À¿626 # À¿626 # Leduc County Tofield ^_ KP 100 Valve Site #5 (KP 97.89) 22 Joseph 20 Ministik 19 18 £14 17 50 Lake 50 ¤ 16 15 14 13 Minburn Lake 12 10 9 Ryley Birch ¤£16 36 Lake New Sarepta À¿833 À¿ 834 KP 110 À¿ ¤£14 À¿870 49 Holden Alice Beaver County 49 Lake Hay Valve Site #6 617 623 617 (KP 119.77) À¿ À¿ # Big Lakes À¿ KP 120 Hay # Lake 48 Camrose County À¿854 À¿616 milion Ver River 48 KP 130 Thomas 833 Dusty À¿ Demay Lake KP 197Lake Lake À¿619 À¿857 Viking À¿619 Bittern Heartland Pipeline (!D 47 Lake Rail Crossing 47 Hardisty North À¿870 Metering Station CAMROSE Highway 14 KP 140 14 26 ¤£ 13 ¤£ À¿615 ¤£ Bittern # Valve Site #7 (KP 148.04) Lake KP 197.9 # M.D.
    [Show full text]
  • Communities Within Rural Municipal
    Communities Within Specialized and Rural Municipalities Updated December 31, 2013 Municipal Services Branch 17th Floor Commerce Place 10155 - 102 Street Edmonton, Alberta T5J 4L4 Phone: 780-427-2225 Fax: 780-420-1016 E-mail: [email protected] COMMUNITIES WITHIN SPECIALIZED AND RURAL MUNICIPAL BOUNDARIES COMMUNITY STATUS MUNICIPALITY Abee Hamlet Thorhild County Acadia Valley Hamlet Municipal District of Acadia No. 34 ACME Village Kneehill County Aetna Hamlet Cardston County ALBERTA BEACH Village Lac Ste. Anne County Alcomdale Hamlet Sturgeon County Alder Flats Hamlet County of Wetaskiwin No. 10 Aldersyde Hamlet Municipal District of Foothills No. 31 Alhambra Hamlet Clearwater County ALIX Village Lacombe County ALLIANCE Village Flagstaff County Altario Hamlet Special Areas Board AMISK Village Municipal District of Provost No. 52 ANDREW Village Lamont County Antler Lake Hamlet Strathcona County Anzac Hamlet Regional Municipality of Wood Buffalo Ardley Hamlet Red Deer County Ardmore Hamlet Municipal District of Bonnyville No. 87 Ardrossan Hamlet Strathcona County ARGENTIA BEACH Summer Village County of Wetaskiwin No. 10 Armena Hamlet Camrose County ARROWWOOD Village Vulcan County Ashmont Hamlet County of St. Paul No. 19 ATHABASCA Town Athabasca County Atmore Hamlet Athabasca County Balzac Hamlet Rocky View County BANFF Town Improvement District No. 09 (Banff) BARNWELL Village Municipal District of Taber BARONS Village Lethbridge County BARRHEAD Town County of Barrhead No. 11 BASHAW Town Camrose County BASSANO Town County of Newell BAWLF Village Camrose County BEAUMONT Town Leduc County Beauvallon Hamlet County of Two Hills No. 21 Beaver Crossing Hamlet Municipal District of Bonnyville No. 87 Beaver Lake Hamlet Lac La Biche County Beaver Mines Hamlet Municipal District of Pincher Creek No.
    [Show full text]
  • Flagstaff County Health Data and Summary
    Alberta Health Primary Health Care - Community Profiles Community Profile: Flagstaff County Health Data and Summary Primary Health Care Division February 2013 Alberta Health, Primary Health Care Division February 2013 Community Profile: Flagstaff County Table of Contents Introduction .................................................................................................................................................. i Community Profile Summary .............................................................................................................. iii Zone Level Information .......................................................................................................................... 1 Map of Alberta Health Services Central Zone .......................................................................................... 2 Population Health Indicators ..................................................................................................................... 3 Table 1.1 Zone versus Alberta Population Covered as at March 31, 2012 ........................................... 3 Table 1.2 Health Status Indicators for Zone versus Alberta Residents, 2010 and 2011 (BMI, Physical Activity, Smoking, Self-Perceived Mental Health) ............................................................................................... 3 Table 1.3 Zone versus Alberta Infant Mortality Rates (per 1,000 live births) Fiscal Years 2008/2009 to 2010/2011 ..................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Alberta Beaver Survey Comprehensive Data Report
    Alberta Beaver Survey Comprehensive Data Report Holly Kinas, Danah Duke and Nisha Panesar Document prepared for Putting Beavers to Work for Watershed Resiliency and Restoration Innovative research. Engaged communities. Healthy landscapes. Alberta Beaver Survey Comprehensive Data Report Prepared by Holly Kinas, Danah Duke and Nisha Panesar December 2017 Miistakis Institute Rm U271, Mount Royal University 4825 Mount Royal Gate SW Calgary, Alberta T3E 6K6 Phone: (403) 440-8444 Email: [email protected] Web: www.rockies.ca Contents Introduction ....................................................................................................... 5 Survey Methods ................................................................................................. 5 Survey Creation ................................................................................................. 5 Survey Distribution ............................................................................................ 6 Analysis ............................................................................................................ 7 Text Analysis Assumptions ........................................................................ 7 Responses .......................................................................................................... 8 Summary of Key Results by Section .................................................................. 9 Demographic .................................................................................................... 9 Eligibility
    [Show full text]
  • 2010 Official Population List
    2010 Official Population List Official population figures are as of September 1, 2010 in compliance with the Determination of Population Regulation 63/2001 under Section 604 of the Municipal Government Act. Unofficial population figures refer to First Nations population on-reserve as of December 2009. Municipal Services Branch 17th Floor Commerce Place 10155 - 102 Street Edmonton, Alberta T5J 4L4 Phone: (780) 427-2225 Fax: (780) 420-1016 E-mail: [email protected] Printed Version: ISBN 978-0-7785-8022-5 Website Version: ISBN 978-0-7785-8021-8 September 15, 2010 Page 1 of 11 ALBERTA MUNICIPAL AFFAIRS 2010 OFFICIAL POPULATION LIST 2010 MUNICIPAL FEDERAL MUNICIPALITY POPULATION CENSUS DATE CENSUS DATE CITIES (17) Airdrie 39,822 01-Apr-10 Brooks 13,581 07-May-07 Calgary 1,071,515 01-Apr-10 Camrose 16,543 03-Apr-08 Cold Lake 13,924 01-Apr-09 Edmonton 782,439 01-Apr-09 Fort Saskatchewan 18,653 03-May-10 Grande Prairie 50,227 01-Apr-07 Lacombe (see p. 10 for additional information) 11,733 15-Apr-09 Leduc 23,293 03-May-10 Lethbridge 86,659 01-Apr-10 Lloydminster – Alberta side only 17,402 15-Apr-09 (see p. 10 for additional information) Medicine Hat 61,097 01-Jun-09 Red Deer 90,084 09-Apr-10 Spruce Grove 24,646 09-Apr-10 St. Albert 60,138 01-Apr-10 Wetaskiwin 12,285 01-Apr-09 Cities Total 2,394,041 SPECIALIZED MUNICIPALITIES (5) Municipality of Crowsnest Pass 5,749 16-May-06 (see p. 10 for additional information) Municipality of Jasper 4,745 23-Jun-08 (see p.
    [Show full text]
  • Watershed Resiliency and Restoration Program Maps
    VU32 VU33 VU44 VU36 V28A 947 U Muriel Lake UV 63 Westlock County VU M.D. of Bonnyville No. 87 18 U18 Westlock VU Smoky Lake County 28 M.D. of Greenview No. 16 VU40 V VU Woodlands County Whitecourt County of Barrhead No. 11 Thorhild County Smoky Lake Barrhead 32 St. Paul VU County of St. Paul No. 19 Frog Lake VU18 VU2 Redwater Elk Point Mayerthorpe Legal Grande Cache VU36 U38 VU43 V Bon Accord 28A Lac Ste. Anne County Sturgeon County UV 28 Gibbons Bruderheim VU22 Morinville VU Lamont County Edson Riv Eds er on R Lamont iver County of Two Hills No. 21 37 U15 I.D. No. 25 Willmore Wilderness Lac Ste. Anne VU V VU15 VU45 r Onoway e iv 28A S R UV 45 U m V n o o Chip Lake e k g Elk Island National Park of Canada y r R tu i S v e Mundare r r e Edson 22 St. Albert 41 v VU i U31 Spruce Grove VU R V Elk Island National Park of Canada 16A d Wabamun Lake 16A 16A 16A UV o VV 216 e UU UV VU L 17 c Parkland County Stony Plain Vegreville VU M VU14 Yellowhead County Edmonton Beaverhill Lake Strathcona County County of Vermilion River VU60 9 16 Vermilion VU Hinton County of Minburn No. 27 VU47 Tofield E r i Devon Beaumont Lloydminster t h 19 21 VU R VU i r v 16 e e U V r v i R y Calmar k o Leduc Beaver County m S Leduc County Drayton Valley VU40 VU39 R o c k y 17 Brazeau County U R V i Viking v e 2A r VU 40 VU Millet VU26 Pigeon Lake Camrose 13A 13 UV M U13 VU i V e 13A tt V e Elk River U R County of Wetaskiwin No.
    [Show full text]
  • 2018 Municipal Codes
    2018 Municipal Codes Updated November 23, 2018 Municipal Services Branch 17th Floor Commerce Place 10155 - 102 Street Edmonton, Alberta T5J 4L4 Phone: 780-427-2225 Fax: 780-420-1016 E-mail: [email protected] 2018 MUNICIPAL CHANGES STATUS / NAME CHANGES: 4353-Effective January 1, 2018 Lac La Biche County became the Specialized Municipality of Lac La Biche County. 0236-Effective February 28, 2018 Village of Nobleford became the Town of Nobleford. AMALGAMATED: FORMATIONS: 6619- Effective April 10, 2018 Bonnyville Regional Water Services Commission formed as a Regional service commission. 6618- Effective April 10, 2018 South Pigeon Lake Regional Wastewater Services Commission formed as a Regional service commission. DISSOLVED: CODE NUMBERS RESERVED: 4737 Capital Region Board 0524 R.M. of Brittania (Sask.) 0462 Townsite of Redwood Meadows 5284 Calgary Regional Partnership STATUS CODES: 01 Cities (18)* 15 Hamlet & Urban Services Areas (396) 09 Specialized Municipalities (6) 20 Services Commissions (73) 06 Municipal Districts (63) 25 First Nations (52) 02 Towns (109) 26 Indian Reserves (138) 03 Villages (86) 50 Local Government Associations (22) 04 Summer Villages (51) 60 Emergency Districts (12) 07 Improvement Districts (8) 98 Reserved Codes (4) 08 Special Areas (4) 11 Metis Settlements (8) * (Includes Lloydminster) November 23, 2018 Page 1 of 14 CITIES CODE CITIES CODE NO. NO. Airdrie 0003 Brooks 0043 Calgary 0046 Camrose 0048 Chestermere 0356 Cold Lake 0525 Edmonton 0098 Fort Saskatchewan 0117 Grande Prairie 0132 Lacombe 0194 Leduc 0200 Lethbridge 0203 Lloydminster* 0206 Medicine Hat 0217 Red Deer 0262 Spruce Grove 0291 St. Albert 0292 Wetaskiwin 0347 *Alberta only SPECIALIZED MUNICIPALITY CODE SPECIALIZED MUNICIPALITY CODE NO.
    [Show full text]
  • Petrochemicals
    PETROCHEMICAL INVESTMENT OPPORTUNITIES The Alberta HUB region offers excellent investment opportunities in the petrochemical sector, which is a natural fit with vast oil & gas industry. The western side of the Alberta HUB region, featuring Lamont County, is highly active in petrochemicals. As a municipal partner in Alberta’s Industrial Heartland, one of the world’s most attractive locations for chemical, petrochemical, oil and gas investment, Lamont County is committed to the continued development and diversification of petrochemical industry within its Industrial Heartland and Alberta HUB area. Situated northeast of the capital city of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta’s Industrial Lamont County’s Industrial Heartland area includes Heartland in the approximately 60 sq. km of western Alberta HUB land zoned for industrial & region has over $40B in commercial development. current investment Lamont County is uniquely and billions more in situated between the Alberta future potential. HUB region in the east and Alberta's Industrial Heartland in the LAC LA BICHE COUNTY west, and is an ideal transportation hub for industry to connect with world markets. Lamont County’s heavy haul routes are a part of the Ports to Plains highway system and provide access to the Edmonton Capital Region and Alberta’s Oil Sands. Its rail access provides east-west regional service for industries within Alberta’s Industrial Heartland to M.D. OF BONNYVILLE Edmonton and Calgary, and direct access to the U.S. through Chicago to the Gulf of Mexico, and to Prince Rupert and the Port of Vancouver. THORHILD COUNTY SMOKY LAKE COUNTY ST. PAUL COUNTY LAMONT COUNTY TWO HILLS COUNTY Lamont County, on the west side of the Alberta COUNTY OF MINBURN Hub region, is one of the High Load Corridor few areas in Canada where Railway COUNTY OF Intersecting Rail VERMILION RIVER the Canadian National and Canadian Pacific Railways intersect.
    [Show full text]