DOCSLIB.ORG

Infrastructuremasterplan Sturge

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

Corporate Authorization This document entitled “Sturgeon County Infrastructure Master Plan” has been prepared by ISL Engineering and Land Services Ltd. (ISL) for the use of Sturgeon County. The information and data provided herein represent ISL’s professional judgment at the time of preparation. ISL denies any liability whatsoever to any other parties who may obtain this report and use it, or any of its contents, without prior written consent from ISL. Barry Raynard, M.Eng., P.Eng. Daniel Zeggelaar, P.Eng., PTOE Manager, Municipal/Water Resources Engineering Project Manager – Transportation islengineering.com Sturgeon County Infrastructure Master Plan July 2019 Sturgeon County – Report i FINAL Council endorsed Sturgeon County's Infrastructure Master Plan to be used as a key infrastructure planning input for the community. Motion 338/19 September 10th, 2019 Table of Contents 1.0 Introduction .................................................................................................................. 1 1.1 Background 2 1.2 Study Purpose 2 1.3 Terminology 2 2.0 Methodology ................................................................................................................ 4 2.1 Project Management Approach 5 2.2 Data Collection 5 2.3 Trends / Growth Projections 5 2.4 Existing Infrastructure Analysis 5 2.5 Future Infrastructure Analysis 6 2.6 Implementation Strategy 6 2.7 Performance Indicators 7 3.0 Trends and Growth Projections .................................................................................... 8 3.1 Introduction 9 3.2 Technical/Environmental Trends 9 3.3 Growth Projection Influences 13 3.4 Growth Projections 17 4.0 Transportation Network .............................................................................................. 25 4.1 Introduction 26 4.2 Traffic Analysis Methodology 26 4.3 Analysis of Transportation Network (Existing) 27 4.4 Analysis Methodology of Future Transportation Network 29 4.5 “Do Nothing” Analysis of Future Transportation Network (2044) 34 4.6 Roadway Classifications Assessment 40 5.0 Water Infrastructure ................................................................................................... 47 5.1 Overview 48 5.2 Existing Potable Water Use 48 5.3 Analysis of Existing Water System & Existing Demands 53 5.4 Future Water Demands 61 5.5 Capacity of Existing Infrastructure for Growth (“Do Nothing”) 64 5.6 Role of Demand Management to Minimize New Infrastructure Requirements 68 5.7 Water System Upgrades to Meet Future Water Demands 69 6.0 Wastewater Infrastructure .......................................................................................... 73 6.1 Introduction 74 6.2 Existing Wastewater Generation 74 6.3 Analysis of Existing Wastewater System & Existing Demands 77 6.4 Future Wastewater Flows 84 6.5 Capacity of Existing Infrastructure for Growth 87 6.6 Role of Demand Management to Minimize New Infrastructure Requirements 92 6.7 Wastewater System Upgrades to Meet Future Flows 93 7.0 Stormwater Infrastructure ........................................................................................... 95 7.1 Introduction 96 7.2 Existing Drainage Basins and Major Hydrographical Features 96 7.3 Existing Stormwater Infrastructure 97 7.4 SWMF Design and Allowable Post-development Release Rates 100 7.5 Capacity of Existing Infrastructure for Growth 102 7.6 Role of Demand Management to Minimize New Infrastructure Requirements 102 7.7 Stormwater System Upgrades to Meet Future Stormwater Flows 102 8.0 Implementation Plan ................................................................................................ 105 8.1 Introduction 106 8.2 Transportation 106 8.3 Water 111 8.4 Wastewater 116 8.5 Stormwater 121 8.6 Plan Updates / Performance Indicators and Monitoring 125 APPENDICES Appendix A Traffic Forecasting Details Appendix B Traffic Signal Warrant Analysis Appendix C Railway Infrastructure Appendix D Lane Requirement Calculation TABLES Table 3.1: Annual Comparison of Sturgeon County Population Projections ................................................... 17 Table 3.2: Sturgeon County’s Population Targets for Major Growth Nodes .................................................... 19 Table 3.3: Population Projections for Thresholds 1, 2 and 3 ........................................................................... 19 Table 3.4: Annual Comparison of Sturgeon County Employment Projections to 2044 ................................... 21 Table 3.5: Employment Allocations ................................................................................................................. 22 Table 3.6: Non-Residential Growth Projections for Key Employment Areas ................................................... 23 Table 4.1: Level of Service.............................................................................................................................. 26 Table 4.2: Two Way Traffic Volumes (Existing) .............................................................................................. 27 Table 4.3: Intersection Levels of Service (Existing) ........................................................................................ 28 Table 4.4: Summary of Trip Adjustments (Transit and Transportation Technology ........................................ 32 Table 4.5: Two Way Traffic Volumes (Phase 3 – 2044) .................................................................................. 34 Table 4.6: Preliminary Phase 3 (2044) LOS Analysis (“Do Nothing”) .............................................................. 35 Table 4.7: Unacceptable Intersection Operations Summary ........................................................................... 36 Table 4.8: Sturgeon Road Lane Requirements – Without 127 Street Extension............................................. 38 Table 4.9: Sturgeon Road Lane Requirements - With 127 Street Extension .................................................. 38 Table 4.10: Rural Roadway Classifications ....................................................................................................... 40 Table 4.11: Suburban/Highway Roadway Classifications ................................................................................. 41 Table 4.12: Existing Roadway Classification System Review ........................................................................... 42 Table 4.13: Proposed Roadway Standard by Class .......................................................................................... 44 Table 4.14: Proposed Roadway Improvements (Existing) ................................................................................ 44 Table 4.15: Roadway Classification System Review (Phase 3 – 2044) ............................................................ 45 Table 4.16: Proposed Roadway Improvements (Phase 3 - 2044) ..................................................................... 45 Table 5.1: Historic Water Use at County Water Reservoirs ............................................................................ 48 Table 5.2: Residential Per Capita Water Use .................................................................................................. 49 Table 5.3: Historical Truck Fill Demands......................................................................................................... 50 Table 5.4: Breakdown of Annual Water Use For Truck Fill Locations. ............................................................ 50 Table 5.5: Residential Per Capita Water Use Excluding Truck Fill Demands ................................................. 51 Table 5.6: Historic Industrial Water Use .......................................................................................................... 52 Table 5.7: Industrial Water Use per Hectare. .................................................................................................. 52 Table 5.8: Current Water Use along Morinville Line ........................................................................................ 54 Table 5.9: Local Water Transmission Main Capacity Analysis ........................................................................ 55 Table 5.10: Existing Water Reservoir Storage Volumes and Design Requirements ......................................... 57 Table 5.11: Existing Pumping Capacity at Water Reservoirs ............................................................................ 58 Table 5.12: Summary of Existing Water Distribution Systems .......................................................................... 59 Table 5.13: Population Projections for Growth Areas ....................................................................................... 61 Table 5.14: Projected Water Demand for Residential Growth Areas ................................................................ 62 Table 5.15: Non-Residential Development Projections for Growth Areas ......................................................... 63 Table 5.16: Demands for Non-Residential Growth Areas ................................................................................. 63 Table 5.17: Future Water Use along Morinville Line ......................................................................................... 65 Table 5.18: Future Local Water Transmission Main Capacity Analysis ............................................................ 66 Table 5.19: Future Water Reservoir Storage Volumes and Design Requirements ........................................... 67 Table 5.20: Future Pumping Capacity at Water
Recommended publications
  • Certificate of Insurance No.: CSA-2020-8-CCC Dated: July 23, 2020 This Document Supersedes Any Certificate Previously Issued Under This Number

    Certificate of Insurance No.: CSA-2020-8-CCC Dated: July 23, 2020 This Document Supersedes Any Certificate Previously Issued Under This Number

    Certificate of Insurance No.: CSA-2020-8-CCC Dated: July 23, 2020 This document supersedes any certificate previously issued under this number This is to certify that the Policy(ies) of insurance listed below ("Policy" or "Policies") have been issued to the Named Insured identified below for the policy period(s) indicated. This certificate is issued as a matter of information only and confers no rights upon the Certificate Holder named below other than those provided by the Policy(ies). Notwithstanding any requirement, term, or condition of any contract or any other document with respect to which this certificate may be issued or may pertain, the insurance afforded by the Policy(ies) is subject to all the terms, conditions, and exclusions of such Policy(ies). This certificate does not amend, extend, or alter the coverage afforded by the Policy(ies). Limits shown are intended to address contractual obligations of the Named Insured. Limits may have been reduced since Policy effective date(s) as a result of a claim or claims. Certificate Holder: Named Insured and Address: As per Schedule, AB Canadian Snowsports Association, including sanctioned activities for Cross Country Ski de fond Canada Suite 202 - 1451 West Broadway Vancouver, BC V6H 1H6 Which Includes sanctioned activities for the following: Alpine Canada Alpin, Canadian Adaptive Snowsports, Canadian Freestyle Ski Association, Canadian Snowboard Federation, Nordic Combined Canada Combiné Nordique, Ski Jumping Canada, Canadian Speed Skiing Association, Telemark Ski Canada Télémark, Canadian Ski Coaches Federation and Cross Country Ski de fond Canada This certificate is issued regarding: Event: 2019-2020 Season Date: July 14, 2020 - June 30, 2021 Location: Various, in Alberta Approved by: Cross Country Cross Ski de fond for Country Alberta The following addendum includes a list of additional Certificate Holders and Additional Insureds included to this certificate.
  • Sturgeon County

    Sturgeon County

    Paddle 2030 75813 River 13472 75108 13621 STURGEON COUNTY 74066 76283 70033 Rg 03 13645 7186 Rg 0274628 81608 Rg 01 77297 Rg 27 Rg 26 7575 76776 71753 Rg 25 Cr Rg 24 9323 13842 2 Rg 23 Rg 22 Lunnford75551 71286 Rg 21 Rg 20 74856 76297 79267 72642 Rg 19 75550 246Redwater 63 Rg 18 73659 75943 74263 8136 654 Wabash 76488 9157 8982 8437 1991 78586 71828 70044 827 Smoky 75013 7538 78063 71584 13809 70724 72948 Fairydell 75129 9660 73227 Newton 81148 72947 77862 71285 8089 8787 73601 78004 Redwater Halfmoon L 7106 6737 9975 849 6578 7105 6775 13183 75974 73343 1219 6609 6783 13742 75132 13629 7644644 8586 74823 71583 6846 9169 R 9092 Egremont 13816 75426 8587 78758 9770 76445 79381 74801 777 Fawn 8828 71253 2097 8769 Tp 58 74622 72388 9880 73571 6724 72803 70043 7026775015 80808 6795 70025 Lake 9124 1422 13648 Cr 70501 Waugh 70266 7338 13190 2139 6503 1078 7482 75316 1993 78593 7585 78806 7436 78847 71034 7437 75975 Manola 76830 72393 81135 7483678992 76891 74972 8430 74130 74397 80796 Tp 58 75186 9126 829 72394 75304 1830 73146 70002 71033 75156 Kerensky 74235 74971 7104 9433 74096 13628 77044 28 Newton L 13843 73344 73219 9481 77993 80831 7821 77645 71724 1805 1931 Cranes L 7451 13589 74467 2023 76437 Opal 72807 7191 77644 9431 80623 78067 81476 7695 75468 8514 7802 73994 613 75692 75553 33 75626 614 George L 76486 75219 70398 78923 7822 71594 7439 Eldorena 6600 808 70312 Highridge Pickardville 2297 74095 7216 79318 Cr 9661 7507 73057 1086 Redwater 77992 Cr 75281 Carley 74469 74803 Jct.
  • Shoestring Ranch Recognized for Environmental

    Shoestring Ranch Recognized for Environmental

    2018 WINTER management, but once they switched to SHOESTRING RANCH focus more on the soil, everything came together. The ranch practices minimum tillage when seeding crops to keep residue RECOGNIZED FOR anchored in the soil and protect the structure to prevent erosion. ENVIRONMENTAL “We try to take an environmental focus on PAGE 2 all the decisions that we do here at the NEW BEGINNINGS STEWARDSHIP ranch, and try to include it in all of our management steps,” said Ian. “We have PAGE 3 Alberta Beef Producers (ABP) presented tried to work with nature as much as we RISKS AND REWARDS Ian and Carman Murray with the 2018 can and we’ve changed the management of Environmental Stewardship Award at the our ranch dramatically to do so.” PAGE 4 ABP Annual General Meeting in December. Dugouts are fenced off with several solar Each year, ABP recognizes a cattle NOW’S THE TIME TO power watering systems to provide better operation that demonstrates leadership CONNECT WITH YOUR VET quality water for the cattle and support in environmental stewardship – one that healthy riparian areas. Shelterbelts are PAGE 5 contributes to the land while improving maintained to protect from wind erosion productivity and profitability. REVAMPING EDUCATION and provide wildlife habitat. PAGE 6 Ian is a fifth-generation Alberta rancher “I’d like to continue to improve upon the whose family originally homesteaded INCENTIVISING ECOSYSTEM utilization of our land, our production, our in 1883, west of Calgary in the Jumping SERVICES cattle and pastures. I’d like to continue to Pound District. In 2007, Ian and Carman improve the health of our soil PAGE 7 moved from north of Cochrane to and the cleanliness of our water,” said Ian.
  • Municipal Guide

    Municipal Guide

    Municipal Guide Planning for a Healthy and Sustainable North Saskatchewan River Watershed Cover photos: Billie Hilholland From top to bottom: Abraham Lake An agricultural field alongside Highway 598 North Saskatchewan River flowing through the City of Edmonton Book design and layout by Gwen Edge Municipal Guide: Planning for a Healthy and Sustainable North Saskatchewan River Watershed prepared for the North Saskatchewan Watershed Alliance by Giselle Beaudry Acknowledgements The North Saskatchewan Watershed Alliance would like to thank the following for their generous contributions to this Municipal Guide through grants and inkind support. ii Municipal Guide: Planning for a Healthy and Sustainable North Saskatchewan Watershed Acknowledgements The North Saskatchewan Watershed Alliance would like to thank the following individuals who dedicated many hours to the Municipal Guide project. Their voluntary contributions in the development of this guide are greatly appreciated. Municipal Guide Steering Committee Andrew Schoepf, Alberta Environment Bill Symonds, Alberta Municipal Affairs David Curran, Alberta Environment Delaney Anderson, St. Paul & Smoky Lake Counties Doug Thrussell, Alberta Environment Gabrielle Kosmider, Fisheries and Oceans Canada George Turk, Councillor, Lac Ste. Anne County Graham Beck, Leduc County and City of Edmonton Irvin Frank, Councillor, Camrose County Jolee Gillies,Town of Devon Kim Nielsen, Clearwater County Lorraine Sawdon, Fisheries and Oceans Canada Lyndsay Waddingham, Alberta Municipal Affairs Murray Klutz, Ducks
  • Antler Lake State of the Watershed Report

    Antler Lake State of the Watershed Report

    Antler Lake State of the Watershed Report October 2019 i Antler Lake State of the Watershed Report North Saskatchewan Watershed Alliance 202 –9440 49th Street NW Edmonton, AB T6B 2M9 (587) 525‐6820 Email: [email protected] http://www.nswa.ab.ca The NSWA gratefully acknowledges operational funding support received from the Government of Alberta and many municipal partners. The North Saskatchewan Watershed Alliance (NSWA) is a non‐profit society whose purpose is to protect and improve water quality and ecosystem functioning in the North Saskatchewan River watershed in Alberta. The organization is guided by a Board of Directors composed of member organizations from within the watershed. It is the designated Watershed Planning and Advisory Council (WPAC) for the North Saskatchewan River under the Government of Alberta’s Water for Life Strategy. This report was prepared by Michelle Gordy, Ph.D., David Trew, B.Sc., Denika Piggott B.Sc., Breda Muldoon, M.Sc., and J. Leah Kongsrude, M.Sc. of the North Saskatchewan Watershed Alliance. Cover photo credit: Kate Caldwell Suggested Citation: North Saskatchewan Watershed Alliance (NSWA), 2019. Antler Lake State of the Watershed Report. Prepared for the Antler Lake Stewardship Committee (ALSC) Antler Lake State of the Watershed Report Executive Summary The Antler Lake Stewardship Committee (ALSC) formed in 2015 to address issues related to lake health. Residents at the lake expressed concerns about deteriorating water quality, blue‐green algal (cyanobacteria1) blooms, proliferation of aquatic vegetation, and low lake levels. In 2016, the Antler Lake Stewardship Committee approached the North Saskatchewan Watershed Alliance (NSWA) to prepare a State of the Watershed report.
  • Copyrighted Material Not for Distribution Fidler in Context

    Copyrighted Material Not for Distribution Fidler in Context

    TABLE OF CONTENTS acknowledgements vii introduction Fidler in Context 1 first journal From York Factory to Buckingham House 43 second journal From Buckingham House to the Rocky Mountains 95 notes to the first journal 151 notes to the second journal 241 sources and references 321 index 351 COPYRIGHTED MATERIAL NOT FOR DISTRIBUTION FIDLER IN CONTEXT In July 1792 Peter Fidler, a young surveyor for the Hudson’s Bay Company, set out from York Factory to the company’s new outpost high on the North Saskatchewan River. He spent the winter of 1792‐93 with a group of Piikani hunting buffalo in the foothills SW of Calgary. These were remarkable journeys. The river brigade travelled more than 2000 km in 80 days, hauling heavy loads, moving upstream almost all the way. With the Piikani, Fidler witnessed hunts at sites that archaeologists have since studied intensively. On both trips his assignment was to map the fur-trade route from Hudson Bay to the Rocky Mountains. Fidler kept two journals, one for the river trip and one for his circuit with the Piikani. The freshness and immediacy of these journals are a great part of their appeal. They are filled with descriptions of regional landscapes, hunting and trading, Native and fur-trade cultures, all of them reflecting a young man’s sense of adventure as he crossed the continent. But there is noth- ing naive or spontaneous about these remarks. The journals are transcripts of his route survey, the first stages of a map to be sent to the company’s head office in London.
  • Ama Road Report Grande Prairie Alberta

    Ama Road Report Grande Prairie Alberta

    Ama Road Report Grande Prairie Alberta Undiscerning and grimmer Claudio break-ins so tenably that Adrian fossilising his staphylococci. Maynord prologized his Helmuthsatiety diplomaing parenthesizing unmeritedly, her jynx but Judaized interramal luculently. Alton never wit so confidentially. Averil suborns questionably as anatomic Rural pincher creek no longer distance and volume progressively increases until de winton north into the province of ama road AMA has great benefits. By late weekend into next week, Yellowhead Trail, I loved this job! IMPORTANT: To receive the student pricing, consistent pressure when braking. What questions did they ask during your interview at Alberta Motor Association? Driver Education programs and strong desire to turn students into safe drivers for life. Alberta throughout the week. Types of suggestions to include. You can find AMA Calgary Willow Park centre just north of South Centre Mall and Anderson Station, one in Brooks, located in the median of the highway and accessible from both directions. Albert the drop in traffic is brisk, classic OR snowshoe. Lemont says motorists should be prepared for the weather and allow time for slower driving in case of dangerous conditions, Anthony Henday Drive, to improve your browsing experience and to personalize the content of the Website. Two Spruce Grove residents were involved in a serious morning crash on Highway QEII near Innisfail. Prices on our website are valid if you purchase services in the same session. Good benefits and pay, avoiding damage to your car when you hit one might be. She does not encourage an inclusive workplace and works to alienate and belittle people.
  • 2021 Regional Transportation Priorities EMRB Integrated Regional Transportation Master Plan

    2021 Regional Transportation Priorities EMRB Integrated Regional Transportation Master Plan

    2021 Regional Transportation Priorities EMRB Integrated Regional Transportation Master Plan August 12, 2021 2021 Regional Transportation Priorities EMRB Integrated Regional Transportation Master Plan Contents 1 Introduction .......................................................................................................................................... 1 2 2021 Regional Transportation Priorities .............................................................................................. 1 2.1 Transit Projects ......................................................................................................................... 1 2.2 Roadway Projects ..................................................................................................................... 2 2.3 Active Transportation Projects .................................................................................................. 2 3 2021 Prioritization Results ................................................................................................................... 2 Appendix A - Project Grouping.................................................................................................................... 12 Appendix B - Project Maps......................................................................................................................... 15 Tables Table 1 - Advance to Planning Priorities ....................................................................................................... 4 Table 2 - Ready for Design Priorities
  • February 2006 UNIVERSITY of ALBERTA SUMMARY of STATISTICS - ACADEMIC YEAR 2005/2006 DECEMBER 1, 2005

    February 2006 UNIVERSITY of ALBERTA SUMMARY of STATISTICS - ACADEMIC YEAR 2005/2006 DECEMBER 1, 2005

    University of Alberta This document canbe obtainedin PDFformat at:www.registrar.ualberta.ca/stats will notassume responsibilityfortheintegrity ofthedata. ce Offi The Registrar’s Ininstances whereadocumenthasbeen altered, ed byanenduser. been modifi ers mustberemovedfrom any tableorgraphthathas proper acknowledgement. Documentidentifi The contentsoftheSummary ofStatisticsbookarenotcopyrightedandmaybe reproducedwith 2005-2006 of Statistics Summary February 2006 February UNIVERSITY OF ALBERTA SUMMARY OF STATISTICS - ACADEMIC YEAR 2005/2006 DECEMBER 1, 2005 ***TABLE OF CONTENTS*** PAGE PREFACE ……………………………………………………………………………………………………………………. 1 GRAPHS 2.1 Ten Year Distribution of Students by Term ............................................................................................... 6 2.2 Spring Term: Enrolment Trends .............................................................................................................. 7 2.3 Summer Term: Enrolment Trends ........................................................................................................... 8 2.4 Fall Term Full-Time Undergraduate: Enrolment Trends ........................................................................ 10 2.5 Fall Term Part-Time Undergraduate: Enrolment Trends ....................................................................... 11 3.1 Spring Term by Faculty .......................................................................................................................... 16 3.2 Summer Term by Faculty ......................................................................................................................
  • Josephburg Terminal

    Josephburg Terminal

    JOSEPHBURG TERMINAL Headquartered in Calgary with operations in Western Canada and Hull, Texas, KEYERA operates an integrated Canadian-based midstream business with extensive interconnected assets and depth of expertise in delivering midstream energy solutions. Our business consists of natural gas gathering and processing, natural gas liquids (NGLs), fractionation, transportation, storage and marketing, iso-octane production and sales and diluent logistic services for oil sands producers. We are committed to conducting our business in a way that balances diverse stakeholder expectations and emphasizes the health and safety of our employees and the communities where we operate. Josephburg Terminal The Josephburg terminal is located near Keyera’s fractionation PROJECT HISTORY and storage facility in Fort Saskatchewan. The Terminal was developed in response to the growth in propane production and allows for essential egress of propane June 2014 Construction commenced from Western Canada. It features a rail rack, rail storage spurs and above ground product storage facilities. The Terminal has a Aug 2015 Operations begin capacity of 42,000 Bbls/d. Josephburg has several upstream and downstream pipeline connections enabling high and low vapour pressure products to be handled at the Terminal. Connections include but are not limited to the Fort Saskatchewan Facilities pipelines and Fort Saskatchewan Condensate System. The Josephburg terminal is located near Fort Saskatchewan, Alberta. Main : 780-912-2450 24-hour emergency: 1-800-661-5642 www.keyera.com
  • Prioritization of Arterial Roads and Primary Highways Projects

    Prioritization of Arterial Roads and Primary Highways Projects

    6. 4 Prioritization of Arterial Roads and Primary . Highways Projects Level of Service and Capital Budget Information Recommendation That the April 3, 2018, Urban Form and Corporate Strategic Development report CR_4227, be received for information. Previous Council/Committee Action At the November 1, 2016, Executive Committee meeting, the following motion was passed: That Administration provide: a. a report outlining the breakdown by quadrant of infrastructure demand/capacity for arterial roads and primary highways in poor and very poor condition. b. a rating (A, B, C, D, F) for intersections on major arterials and primary highways categorized by quadrant c. some analysis on how this information would inform the prioritization of arterial road addition and widening projects for the next couple of budget cycles and return to Committee in the first quarter of 2018. Executive Summary This report outlines the status and performance of aspects of the road network and how improvements to the network are coordinated between the land development industry and the City. Monitoring indicates that the majority of Edmonton’s arterial road network and primary highways are operating within design capacity, and 94 percent of arterial road intersections in the city are rated A through E. This means they are operating within an acceptable level of service. Twenty intersections (six percent) are rated F. This means they are congested during peak hours. Some of the F rated intersections are in new growth areas where the road network is not fully developed. Other F rated ROUTING - Urban Planning Committee | DELEGATION - P. Ohm/D. Vriend April 3, 2018 – Urban Form and Corporate Strategic Development CR 4227 Page 1 of 8 Prioritization of Arterial Roads and Primary Highways Projects intersections in the city would require additional investigation to determine the cause of congestion and the benefits of additional investment in improvements.
  • University of Alberta Perceptions and Parameters of Education As A

    University of Alberta Perceptions and Parameters of Education As A

    University of Alberta Perceptions and Parameters of Education as a Treaty Right within the Context of Treaty 7 Sheila Carr-Stewart A thesis submitted to the Faculîy of Graduate Studies and Research in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in Educational Administration and Leadership Department of Educational Policy Studies Edmonton, Alberta spring 2001 National Library Bibliothèque nationale m*u ofCanada du Canada Acquisitions and Acquisitions et Bibliographk Services services bibliographiques 395 Wellington Street 395. nie Wellington Ottawa ON KIA ON4 Oîîawa ON K1A ON4 Canada Canada The author has granted a non- L'auteur a accordé une licence non exclusive licence allowing the exclusive permettant à la National Library of Canada to Bibliothèque nationale du Canada de reproduce, loan, distribute or sell reproduire, prêter, distribuer ou copies of this thesis in microform, vendre des copies de cette thèse sous paper or electronic formats. la forme de microfiche/nlm, de reproduction sur papier ou sur format électronique. The author retains ownership of the L'auteur conserve la propriété du copyright in this thesis. Neither the droit d'auteur qui protège cette thèse. thesis nor substantid extracts fkom it Ni la thèse ni des extraits substantiels may be printed or othenirise de celle-ci ne doivent êeimprimés reproduced without the author's ou autrement reproduits sans son permission. autorisation . In memory of John and Betty Carr and Pat and MyrtIe Stewart Abstract On September 22, 1877, representatives of the Blackfoot Confederacy, Tsuu T'ha and Stoney Nations, and Her Majesty's Govemment signed Treaty 7. Over the next century, Canada provided educational services based on the Constitution Act, Section 91(24).