L Ib RAR1 E S Submitted to the Program in Science, Technology, and Society in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree Of

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

L Ib RAR1 E S Submitted to the Program in Science, Technology, and Society in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree Of The Herds Shot Round the World: Native Breeds and the British Empire, 1800-1900 by Rebecca J. H. Woods MAiSSAHUSETSsSTNTE "IF TEkCIHNCILnY M.A., B.A. University of Western Ontario, 2006 McGill University, 2003 L iB RAR1 E S Submitted to the Program in Science, Technology, and Society in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy in History, Anthropology, and Science, Technology and Society at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology September 2013 © 2013 Rebecca J. H. Woods All Rights Reserved. The author hereby grants to MIT permission to reproduce and distribute publicly paper and electronic copies of this tis isdocument in whole or in part in any medium now known or 1ereafter created. Signature of Auth OE I '/-~nthropology, f and Science, Technology and Society 24 June 2013 Certified by: Harriet Ritvo Arthur J. Conner Professor of History Thesis Supervisor Certified by: Dav*d Shumway Jones A. Bernard Ackerman Professor of the Culture of Medicine (Harvard University; formerly MIT-STS) Thesis Committee Member Certified by: Janet Browne Aramont Professor of the History of Science (Harvard University) Thesis Committee Member Acceptcd by: ____________ ________ Harriet Ritvo Arthur J. Conner Professor of History Director pftqraduate Studies, History, Anthropology, and STS Accepted by: David Kaiser Germeshausen Professor of the History of Science, STS Director, Program in Science, Technology, and Society Senior Lecturer, Department of Physics The Herds Shot Round the World: Native Breeds and the British Empire, 1800-1900 by Rebecca J. H. Woods Submitted to the Program in Science, Technology, and Society on June 23, 2013, in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy in History, Anthropology, and Science, Technology and Society Abstract This dissertation explores the relationship between types of livestock and place in the context of Great Britain's expanding agro-pastoral empire. Specifically, it examines how the distribution and circulation of breeds of livestock native to the British Isles influenced understandings of kind and location-of the dynamic interaction between heredity, human influence and environmental conditions, and their various fluid effects on ovine and bovine diversity. Drawing on extensive archival work in the United Kingdom, New Zealand, and Australia, I trace both the national origins and imperial expansion of British breeds. As Britain industrialized in the early nineteenth century, breeders faced the need to convert the specificity of their animals into fungibility while maintaining the distinctive character of their breeds, seemingly incompatible aims that nonetheless guaranteed the economic viability of their stock. Thus they reoriented local variability towards market standardization, transforming regional types of cattle and sheep into geographically transposable, bulky, and quick-fattening beasts suited for increasingly sophisticated economies and industrialized production. Tension between standardization and specialization shaped the dispersal of breeds throughout the empire as well. Here, stockbreeders served two masters: the unfamiliar climates and topographies of Australia, New Zealand, and North America, which demanded local adaptations, and the British consumer, whose dinner table was the end of the line for the bulk of colonial beef and mutton. As they tried to balance local adaptation and metropolitan taste, breeders experimented with heredity, testing the limits of contemporary understandings of heritability and breed plasticity, and developed of new strains of livestock genetically derived from British breeds, but culturally, economically and environmentally hybrid. In the process, imperialism itself was instantiated in these animals. Bodies of sheep and cattle were remade to suit new lands and later to fill the refrigerated holds of ocean liners. The empire itself was recast as a vast apparatus for feeding Britons. This system, divested of its imperial trappings and disseminated still further, brings meat to tables around the world today. Thesis Supervisor: Harriet Ritvo Title: Arthur J. Conner Professor of History i ii Acknowledgments In researching and writing this dissertation, I have benefited from the support of several funding agencies. Tuition and stipend were provided by MIT's History, Anthropology, ans Science, Technology and Society (HASTS) graduate program, and by the MIT Kenan Sahin Presidential Fellowship. Early research in the United Kingdom was funded by a Dissertation Proposal Development Fellowship from the Social Sciences Research Council (SSRC), while an extended research trip to New Zealand and the UK in 2009-2010 was possible thanks to an International Dissertation Research Fellowship (SSRC) and a Fulbright Fellowship to New Zealand (Fulbright-IEE and Fulbright New Zealand). Completing the final stages of the project would hardly have been possible without the benefit of a Mellon-ACLS Dissertation Completion Fellowship awarded by the American Council of Learned Societies in 2012. The History Project at Harvard University and the University of Cambridge also generously funded a final research trip to the United Kingdom in April 2013. Practical and material support from these funding agencies made it possible for me to undertake the work necessary for executing this dissertation, but without the intellectual and moral support of mentors and colleagues in the HASTS graduate program at MIT, I can scarcely imagine having brought this project to fruition. My greatest debt is to Harriet Ritvo, who has been a superb advisor and most generous mentor throughout. It has been an honor and a pleasure to work with her. David Jones and Janet Browne at Harvard University have been integral to the formulation and execution of my dissertation, and I am grateful for their support. Stefan Helmreich, Heather Paxson, Leo Marx, Chris Capozzola, and David Kaiser have each made my time at HASTS intellectually richer, as have my fellows in arms in the graduate program. Special thanks to Etienne Benson, Laurel Braitman, Peter Doshi, Lisa Messeri, Sophia Roosth, Caterina Scaramelli, Ryan Shapiro, Shira Shmu'ely, David Singerman, Alma Steingart, Michaela Thompson, Emily Wanderer, iii and Ben Wilson. Karen Gardner, Bianca Sinaulsky, and Paree Pinkney in STS Headquarters, and Margo Collett and Mabel Chin Sorett in the History Department provided administrative support, and made it a pleasure to spend time in Building E5 1. I have benefited from a broad intellectual community throughout the process of preparing this dissertation. I thank the members of the Darwin Correspondence Project at Harvard University and the University of Cambridge, and for Janet Browne for providing me with the opportunity to join a wonderful team of researchers. I also owe a special thanks to Bill Turkel at the University of Western Ontario, who deserves credit for setting me on this path, and gave me necessary early encouragement. Julie Kleinman, Jonathan Echeverri Zuluaga, Louisa Lombard, and Claudio Sopranzetti have been excellent remote colleagues in the Anthro Writers' Group. Parts of this dissertation benefited from feedback received at several conferences and workshops, including the HASTS Program Seminar (2012), the DPDF Animals Studies group (June and September 2008), the International Workshop for PhD Scholars in Environmental History (Australian National University, October 2010), the IDRF workshop (March 2011), the Harvard Symposium on Energy and Environment in Global History (Harvard University, April 2011), the German Historical Institute Conference on Global Cash Crops (June 2011), and the Nonhuman Empires: Between Agents and Actants Conference at the Department of History and Philosophy of Science (University of Cambridge, March 2012). While researching this dissertation, I benefited greatly from the assistance and expertise of a number of librarians, archivists, and livestock breeders close to home and throughout the United Kingdom and New Zealand. Critical support came from the librarians and archivists at the British Library; the Walter Frank Perkins Agricultural Library (Southampton Univeristy); the Museum of English Rural Life (University of Reading); the University Library (University of Cambridge); the National Archives of Scotland; the Herefordshire Record Office; Lincolnshire Record Office; Derbyshire Record Office; the Hereford Cattle Society; Lincoln Sheep Breeders' Association; the Rare Breeds Survival Trust; the library of the Royal Agricultural Society of England; the Australian National Library; Archives New Zealand and the Alexander Turnbull Library in Wellington, New Zealand; and the Hocken Library (University of Otago). Special thanks to John Charles, Associate University Librarian at Massey University (Palmerston North, NZ), and Michelle Baildon at MIT. Les Cook, Peter Talbot, and Bev Trowbridge were among the practical breeders who generously shared their time and knowledge with me. Finally, I thank my family-my brothers Ned and Alex, and my parents, Betty and Frank-for their love, support, and patience. iv Contents Abstract Acknowledgements - III Introduction Chapter 1 - Defining the Problem 23 Chapter 2 - Much Ado About Mutton_ - 59 Chapter 3 - Measuring Purity 99 Chapter 4 - New Zealand's Own 145 Chapter 5 - Return of the Native Breed 199 Conclusion __ ___ 25 1 Bibliography-_ 261 v vi Introduction Introduction In 1949, the Earl of Halifax graced a promotional handbook on British breeds of livestock with an
Recommended publications
  • CATAIR Appendix
    CBP and Trade Automated Interface Requirements Appendix: PGA April 24, 2020 Pub # 0875-0419 Contents Table of Changes ............................................................................................................................................4 PG01 – Agency Program Codes .................................................................................................................... 18 PG01 – Government Agency Processing Codes ............................................................................................. 22 PG01 – Electronic Image Submitted Codes.................................................................................................... 26 PG01 – Globally Unique Product Identification Code Qualifiers .................................................................... 26 PG01 – Correction Indicators* ...................................................................................................................... 26 PG02 – Product Code Qualifiers.................................................................................................................... 28 PG04 – Units of Measure .............................................................................................................................. 30 PG05 – Scie nt if ic Spec ies Code .................................................................................................................... 31 PG05 – FWS Wildlife Description Codes .....................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • ATIC1294 {By Email}
    Animal and Plant Health Agency F 01932 357608 Access to Information Team Weybourne Building Ground Floor www.gov.uk/apha Woodham Lane New Haw Addlestone Surrey KT15 3NB Our Ref: ATIC1294 {By Email} 17 April 2018 Dear PROVISION OF REQUESTED INFORMATION Thank you for your request for information about bovine Tb in rare breeds which we received on 18 March 2018. Your request has been handled under the Freedom of Information Act 2000 (FOIA) The information you requested and our response is detailed below: ‘I am looking into the impact bovine TB has on traditional/rare breeds of cattle in the United Kingdom. I should be very grateful if you could provide me with the following information:’ ‘Number of cattle of the breeds listed below (pure bred) compulsorily slaughtered as reactors or direct contacts in 2016 and 2017 and if possible, listed by region’ 1) Beef Shorthorn Breed code BSH 2) Whitebred Shorthorn " WS 3) British White " BW 4) Devon " DEV 5) Dexter " DEX 6) Gloucester " GL 7) Guernsey " GU 8) Hereford " HE 9) Jersey " JE 10) Lincoln Red " LR 11) Red Poll " RP 12) South Devon " SD 13) Sussex " SU 14) Welsh Black " WB 15) White Park " WP 16) English Longhorn " LH The Animal and Plant Health Agency is an Executive Agency of the Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs working to safeguard animal and plant health for the benefit of people, the environment and the economy. The information you have requested has been placed on a spreadsheet and attached to our reply as Appendix 1. N.B.
    [Show full text]
  • "First Report on the State of the World's Animal Genetic Resources"
    Country Report of Australia for the FAO First Report on the State of the World’s Animal Genetic Resources 2 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY................................................................................................................5 CHAPTER 1 ASSESSING THE STATE OF AGRICULTURAL BIODIVERSITY THE FARM ANIMAL SECTOR IN AUSTRALIA.................................................................................7 1.1 OVERVIEW OF AUSTRALIAN AGRICULTURE, ANIMAL PRODUCTION SYSTEMS AND RELATED ANIMAL BIOLOGICAL DIVERSITY. ......................................................................................................7 Australian Agriculture - general context .....................................................................................7 Australia's agricultural sector: production systems, diversity and outputs.................................8 Australian livestock production ...................................................................................................9 1.2 ASSESSING THE STATE OF CONSERVATION OF FARM ANIMAL BIOLOGICAL DIVERSITY..............10 Major agricultural species in Australia.....................................................................................10 Conservation status of important agricultural species in Australia..........................................11 Characterisation and information systems ................................................................................12 1.3 ASSESSING THE STATE OF UTILISATION OF FARM ANIMAL GENETIC RESOURCES IN AUSTRALIA. ........................................................................................................................................................12
    [Show full text]
  • O R R I E D a L E Official Newsletter of the Australian Corriedale Association Inc
    Australian O R R I E D A L E Official Newsletter of the Australian Corriedale Association Inc. G.P.O. Box 75, Melbourne, Vic. 3001. web: www.corriedale.org.au FEBRUARY 2010 Phone: (03) 9817 6711 Email: [email protected] Australian Wool Innovation There is a lot of science FROM THE supporting wool in the home, PRESIDENT Much of my time in recent so we hope that the market months has been occupied will eventually wake up to with corresponding with the science. AWI. At our Federal Council meeting in July, we There is more to be done in invited the CEO of AWI, our relationship with AWI, Brenda McGahan to address but a start has been made and Corriedale breeders on the they are more than happy to role AWI is playing in communicate. We have just marketing Corriedale wool. sent them a selection of While she focussed mainly photos to use in their next on the new structure of AWI, promotional campaign. If general manager of AWI, anyone wishes to receive the Stuart McCullough, spoke AWI magazine „Beyond the about options for increasing Bale‟, contact demand for broader micron Communications manager, wools. Marius Cuming at [email protected] Since then, the ACA has Brenton J. Lush been communicating with Prince Charles promotes President AWI and other breeds about Wool marketing options for broader wools. This resulted Some of you may have heard It is always pleasant to be in an invitation to join other that Prince Charles has able to write a report and wool growers at an AWI launched a campaign in look at the positive news and Grower Forum in Sydney in Britain to promote wool.
    [Show full text]
  • Would You Like to Receive a 2020 Catalog?
    Would you like to receive a 2020 catalog? There will be a $5 shipping fee to cover the cost of postage on all mailed catalogs. Return this card along with a check for $5 made payable to Maryland Sheep & Wool Festival to PO Box 99, Glenwood, MD 21738, or order a catalog online at www.sheepandwool.org. There will be a $25 charge on any check returned for any reason. Please send me a 2020 Festival Catalog Please Print Clearly Name Address City State Zip Phone # or email Check if this is a change of address. I have enclosed a check for $5 per catalog to cover shipping. Number of catalogs ordered _____. I have enclosed a donation of $_____. Total enclosed $ __________. The Forty-Sixth Annual May 4 & 5, 2019 Howard County Fairgrounds Sponsored by The Maryland Sheep Breeders Association Cover art by Bart Walter Artist information on page 40 Cover design by Ashton Design The Maryland Sheep & Wool Festival is presented by the Maryland Sheep Breeders Association, Inc., a not for profit organization. The Festival’s purpose is to educate the public about sheep and wool. The Festival is organized and conducted by volunteers from the sheep breeding and fiber arts communities. Maryland Sheep & Wool Festival PO Box 99, Glenwood, MD 21738 410-531-3647 www.sheepandwool.org Festival Location: Howard County Fairgrounds 2210 Fairgrounds Road, West Friendship, MD 21794 2020 Festival Dates: May 2 & 3 CONTENTS Festival Map ........................................2 Sheep Breeds Display .....................118 2019 Sheep & Wool Festival Sheep Shearing Demonstrations
    [Show full text]
  • Agriculture in the Falkland Islands
    Department of Agriculture Introduction Vision and Goals Falkland Islands Government The Falkland Islands supports an extensive range- Department of Agriculture land based agriculture sector. The main product is wool, with an EU approved abattoir producing Our Vision - A prosperous and self-reliant agricultural mutton and lamb for local and export markets and sector that creates opportunities for Falkland Islanders beef for local markets. and is highly valued locally and internationally. Our Mission - To foster a viable and internationally Wool produced in the Falklands is of superior competitive agricultural industry through integrated length and is regarded as some of the whitest and applied research, extension, business skills develop- cleanest wool in the world. ment and regulatory programmes. Goals Location . Provide research and extension support to improve . 483km from South America profitability and sustainability of farming businesses . Latitude: 51° - 53° South . Evaluate advances in animal and plant science for . Longitude 57° - 62° West adoption in the Falklands . 3,200 Falkland Island residents (2016 census) . Improve reproductive performance of sheep flocks . To improve genetics of sheep and cattle herds Geography through Artificial Insemination and Embryo Transfer . Total Land Area of 12,173km² programmes . Two main islands plus 778 smaller islands . To provide farms across the Falklands with superior . Topographically generally hilly sheep genetics via the National Stud Flock . Highest point is 705 m . To assist with marketing of wool through: . Administering The ‘Quality Falklands Wool’ Agriculture Climate scheme for excellence in wool preparation. Average annual rainfall range: 400—800mm . Sampling, analysis and certification of wool . Average temperature range: 2.2°C—9.4°C .
    [Show full text]
  • Spinning Daily Presents Wool Washing
    presents Wool Washing ©F+W Media, Inc. ■ All rights reserved ■ F+W Media grants permission for any or all pages in this issue to be copied for personal use Spin.Off ■ spinningdaily.com ■ 1 ou’re ready to take the plunge—literally—into raw fiber processing, and you know that wool can felt and Yshrink into a matted mess. But it doesn’t have to (after all, sheep get wet without shrinking). Let our experts guide you through selecting the proper animal fiber to meet your goals, then through washing wool without fear. It’s not nearly as difficult as you might think, and it produces great results. Have fun splashing in a basin of water. Watch wool transform from a greasy, dirty handful into a fluffy, puffy, silky mass. It’s like magic. Happy washing and spinning! Anne Merrow [email protected] 3 Choosing Fiber—Where to Start? by Diane Lalomia 8 Washing Wool Fleece by Rita Buchanan 11 Washing Wool by Robin Russo 14 On Washing Fleece by Judith MacKenzie Spin•O It’s about making yarn by hand! Spin•O magazine, published four times a year, features articles about the ancient and thriving cra of spinning. Each issue highlights the vibrant and diverse spinning community and explores the intricacies of spinning. spinningdaily.com ©F+W Media, Inc. ■ All rights reserved ■ F+W Media grants permission for any or all pages in this issue to be copied for personal use Spin.Off ■ spinningdaily.com ■ 2 Choosing Fiber— Where to Start? BY D IANE L ALOMIA o many of us choose the project after the yarn is spun, especially when we’re working with just 4 ounces Sof fi ber.
    [Show full text]
  • UK National Inventory of Farm Animal Genetic Resources: Bovines
    UK National Inventory of Farm Animal Genetic Resources Bovines This table is part of the UKs national inventory of farm animal breeds present in the UK, and updates the 2012 inventory published in the Country Report: https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/uk-country-report-on-farm-animal-genetic-resources-2012 The inventory helps Defra monitor breed populations and identify breeds that may be at risk, and the updated inventory shows the current breed data for Bovines (cows), Ovines (sheep), Equines (horses), Porcines (pigs), Caprines (goats) and Camelids (llamas/alpacas) as at 10 August 2016. Breed General Breed Status Breed Name Average Estimated Estimated Estimated C Breed origin Breed status females pedigree pedigree pedigree o in the UK registered for registered registered registered m 3 years (2012, breeding breeding breeding p 2013 & 2014) females in females in females in a 2015 2012 2002 r i s Aberdeen-Angus 9,653 33,977 29,486 11,500 N ZR Aberdeen-Angus (Original 45 157 144 <150 N BAR, NBAR, Population) ZR Albion 3 11 163 95 E (formerly BID native) Ancient Cattle of Wales 28 97 92 E BID, GC? (Coloured Welsh Cattle / Belted Welsh Black) Ayrshire 6,647 23,396 11,264 7,000 N ZR Bazadaise 96 338 560 300 E Beef Shorthorn 2,486 8,752 7,207 582 N NBAR, ZR Belted Galloway 791 2,783 3,520 1,400 N BAR, NBAR, ZR British Blonde 896 3,155 3,847 8,500 E ZR, GC? British Blue 730 2,568 3,769 10,000 E BID, ZR British Charolais 4,009 14,112 13,153 15,000 E ZR British Friesian (Original) 2824 * 9,940 1,924 N BAR, NBAR, ZR British Friesian including
    [Show full text]
  • April 2020 PARISH NEWS
    80P Parish News April 2020 PARISH NEWS APRIL 2020 THE PARISHES OF THE LULWORTHS, WINFRITH NEWBURGH AND CHALDON 1 Parish News April 2020 Parish Organisations ORGANISATION CONTACT POSITION TELEPHONE Benefice of the lulworths, winfrith & chaldon Priest-in-Charge 01929 400741 Benefice of the lulworths, winfrith & chaldon Mr Paul Pinnock Lay Pastoral Assistant 01929 400143 Benefice of the lulworths, winfrith & chaldon Mr John Yonwin Lay Benefice Vice Chairman 01305 852117 Holy Trinity, West Lulworth Mr Paul Simpson Churchwarden 01929 400376 St Christopher's, Winfrith Mr Giles Marsh Churchwarden 01929 400259 St Nicholas, Chaldon Mr Jeremy Selfe Churchwarden 01305 852138 St Andrew’s, East Lulworth Mr Paul Pinnock Churchwarden 01929 400143 BENEFICE Parochial Church Council Mr Eddie Morrison Secretary 01305 853272 Mrs V Blandamer Treasurer 01929 400584 Benefice of the lulworths, winfrith & chaldon Mrs Barbara Marsden Parish Safeguarding Rep 01929 400259 Administrator, Holy Rood Church Chaldon Herring Village Hall Carole Redhouse Secretary 01305 851827 Chaldon Parish Council Miss Emily Blake Clerk 01305 853965 Children’s Drama Group Chris Eldred Organiser 01929 406175 DANCE FOR KIX Gemma Dale Organiser 01305 852137 East Lulworth Parish Council Liz Maidment Clerk 07909924692 Friends of Lulworth & Winfrith PRIMARY School Anna Veal Secretary 01305 852830 Ladies’ Friendship Circle Mrs Marjorie Bird Secretary 01305 852908 Lulworth & District Garden Society Mr J Watts Secretary 01929 400749 Lulworth & Winfrith CE VC PRIMARY School Mr Richard Skinner Head Teacher 01929 400330 Share and Care Link Persons 07751 968 944 The Lulworth Players TBA Chairman West Lulworth Artsreach TBA Promoter West Lulworth Parish Council Miss Emily Blake Clerk 01305 853965 West Lulworth Village Hall Mrs Pauline Hill Bookings Sec.
    [Show full text]
  • Animal Genetic Resources Information Bulletin
    The designations employed and the presentation of material in this publication do not imply the expression of any opinion whatsoever on the part of the Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations concerning the legal status of any country, territory, city or area or of its authorities, or concerning the delimitation of its frontiers or boundaries. Les appellations employées dans cette publication et la présentation des données qui y figurent n’impliquent de la part de l’Organisation des Nations Unies pour l’alimentation et l’agriculture aucune prise de position quant au statut juridique des pays, territoires, villes ou zones, ou de leurs autorités, ni quant au tracé de leurs frontières ou limites. Las denominaciones empleadas en esta publicación y la forma en que aparecen presentados los datos que contiene no implican de parte de la Organización de las Naciones Unidas para la Agricultura y la Alimentación juicio alguno sobre la condición jurídica de países, territorios, ciudades o zonas, o de sus autoridades, ni respecto de la delimitación de sus fronteras o límites. All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying or otherwise, without the prior permission of the copyright owner. Applications for such permission, with a statement of the purpose and the extent of the reproduction, should be addressed to the Director, Information Division, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, Viale delle Terme di Caracalla, 00100 Rome, Italy. Tous droits réservés. Aucune partie de cette publication ne peut être reproduite, mise en mémoire dans un système de recherche documentaire ni transmise sous quelque forme ou par quelque procédé que ce soit: électronique, mécanique, par photocopie ou autre, sans autorisation préalable du détenteur des droits d’auteur.
    [Show full text]
  • CATAIR Appendix
    CBP and Trade Automated Interface Requirements Appendix: PGA February 12, 2021 Pub # 0875-0419 Contents Table of Changes .................................................................................................................................................... 4 PG01 – Agency Program Codes ........................................................................................................................... 18 PG01 – Government Agency Processing Codes ................................................................................................... 22 PG01 – Electronic Image Submitted Codes.......................................................................................................... 26 PG01 – Globally Unique Product Identification Code Qualifiers ........................................................................ 26 PG01 – Correction Indicators* ............................................................................................................................. 26 PG02 – Product Code Qualifiers........................................................................................................................... 28 PG04 – Units of Measure ...................................................................................................................................... 30 PG05 – Scientific Species Code ........................................................................................................................... 31 PG05 – FWS Wildlife Description Codes ...........................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Final Report 2017 - 2018
    BY394 Ecology Project Final Report 2017 - 2018 Impacts of livestock grazing on winter woodland bird diversity By Guy Border In part fulfilment of requirements for the degree of BSc (Hons) Biological Sciences Abstract An increasing interest in the use of conservation grazing as a tool to restore wood pasture environments poses possible implications for winter woodland bird diversity, due to the known ability of livestock grazing to alter woodland vegetation structure. In order to gain a clearer understanding of the impact this management technique has upon woodland birds during this season, this study compares the bird species richness, abundance of dense understory foragers (Robin Erithacus rubecula, Dunnock Prunella modularis, Wren Troglodytes troglodytes and Blackbird Turdus merula), and percentage cover of understory vegetation in two livestock-grazed and two un- grazed Sussex woodlands during the winter of 2017/18. No significant difference is found between either three of these variables in grazed and un-grazed woodland, attributed in part to the grazing pressure on the grazed woodlands being too low to significantly alter their understories. This demonstrates the potential for small numbers of livestock to be introduced into woodlands without significantly altering bird communities or vegetation structure. Elements of this study’s data collection methods are then critiqued and recommendations to future repeat studies are discussed, namely to survey woodlands with a range of grazing pressures and grazing histories, enabling an assessment of bird and vegetation-related variables under varying grazing levels. Introduction Vegetation structure is considered to be the primary factor determining habitat suitability for temperate woodland birds, with tree species composition regarded as playing a lesser role (Hewson et al., 2011).
    [Show full text]