DOCSLIB.ORG

SHELLEY MODERN JUDGEMENTS General Editor: P

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
SHELLEY MODERN JUDGEMENTS General Editor: P Modern judgements SHELLEY MODERN JUDGEMENTS General Editor: P. N. FURBANK Dickens A. E. Dyson Henry James Tony Tanner Milton Alan Rudrum Walter Scott D. D. Devlin Shelley R. B. W oodings Swift A. NormanJeffares IN PREPARATION Matthew Arnold P. A. W. Collins Freud F. Cioffi Marvell M. Wilding 0'Casey Ronald Ayling Pasternak Donald Davie and Angela Livingstone Pope Graham Martin Racine R. C. Knight Shelley MODERN JUDGEMENTS edited by R. B. WOODINGS Macmillan Education Selection and editorial matter @ R. B. W oodings 1968 Softcover reprint of the hardcover 1st edition 1968 Published by MACMILLAN AND CO LTD Little Essex Street London w c 2 and also at Bombay Calcutta and Madras Macmillan South Africa (Publishers) Pty Ltd Johannesburg The Macmillan Company ofAustralia Pty Ltd Melbourne The Macmillan Company ofCanada Ltd Toronto ISBN 978-0-333-01677-0 ISBN 978-1-349-15257-5 (eBook) DOI 10.1007/978-1-349-15257-5 Contents Acknowledgements 7 General Editor's Prefoce 9 Introduction II Chronology 29 FREDERICK A. POTTLE The Case ofShelley 35 c. E. PULOS Thelmportance ofShelley's Scepticism 52 NEVILLE ROGERS Shelley and the West Wind 58 GLENN o'MALLEY Shelley's 'Air-prism': the Synesthetic Scheme ofAlastor 72 HAROLD BLOOM The Quest: Alastor 87 HAROLD BLOOM The Witch ofAtlas 93 K. N. CAMERON The Political Symbolism of Prometheus Unbound 102 EARL R. WASSERMAN MythinShelley'sPoetry 130 D. J. HUGHES Potentiality in Prometheus Unbound 142 G. M. MATTHEWS A Volcano'sVoiceinShelley 162 JOSEPH RABEN Shelley as Translator 196 CARLOS BAKER The Evening Star: Adonais 213 M. WILSON Pavilioned upon Chaos: the Problem of Hellas 228 E. E. BOSTETTER ShelleyandtheMutinousFlesh 241 J. J. McGANN The Secrets of an Elder Day: Shelley after Hellas 253 6 Contents MANFRED WOJCIK lnDefenceofShelley 272 Select Bibliography 286 Notes on Contributors 288 Index 291 Acknowledgements F. A. Pottle, 'The Case of Shelley', from Publications of the Modern Language Association of America, LXVn {1952) {The Modern Language Association of America); C. E. Pulos, The Deep Truth (University of Nebraska Press); N. Rogers, 'Shelley and the West Wind', from the London Magazine, m v; Glenn O'Malley, 'Shelley's Air Prism: the Synthetic Scheme of Alastor', from Modern Philology, LV (1958) {University of Chicago Press); The Visionary Company (Doubleday & Co. Inc.; © Harold Bloom 1961); Kenneth N. Cameron, 'The Political Symbolism of Prometheus Unbound', from Publications of the Modern Language Association of America, LVIn (1943) {The Modern Language Association of America); Earl R. Wasserman, Shelley's 'Prometheus Unbound' (Johns Hopkins Press); D. J. Hughes, 'Poten­ tiality in Prometheus Unbound', from Studies in Romanticism, XI (1963) {Boston University); G. M. Matthews, 'A Volcano's Voice in Shelley', from Journal of English Literary History, XXIV (1957) (Johns Hopkins Press); Joseph Raben, 'Milton's Influence on Shelley's Translation of Dante's "Matilda Gathering Flowers"', from Review of English Studies, NS XIV (1963) (The Clarendon Press); Carlos Baker, 'The Evening Star: Adonais', from Shelley's Major Poetry: The Fabric of a Vision {Princeton University Press); M. Wilson, Shelley's Later Poetry (Columbia University Press); Edward E. Hostetter, 'Shelley and the Mutinous Flesh', from Texas Studies in Literature and Language, 1 (1959) {University of Texas Press); Jerome J. McGann, 'The Secrets of an Elder Day: Shelley after Hellas', from Keats-Shelley Journal, xv (1966} (The Keats-Shelley Association of America Inc.); Manfred Wojcik, 'In Defence of Shelley', from Zeitschrift fur Anglistik und Amerikanistik, no. 2 (1963) {VEB Deutscher Verlag der Wissenschaften). The editor would like to thank Neville Rogers and Geoffrey Matthews for their suggestions, Peter Salus and Mihail Bogdan of Cluj University 8 Acknowledgements for providing reference details, and especially Nicholas Brooke for his kindness in reading and commenting on a version of the Introduction. He is grateful to Jane Lott for her very patient typing. General Editor's Preface LITERARY criticism has only recendy come of age as an academic discipline, and the intellectual activity that, a hundred years ago, went into theological discussion, now finds its most natural oudet in the critical essay. Amid a good deal that is dull or silly or pretentious, every year now produces a crop of critical essays which are brilliant and pro­ found not only as contributions to the understanding of a particular author, but as statements of an original way oflooking at literature and the world. Hence it often seems that the most useful undertaking for an academic publisher might be, not so much to commission new books of literary criticism or scholarship, as to make the best of what exists easily available. This at least is the purpose of the present series of anthologies, each ofwhich is devoted to a single major writer. The guiding principle of selection is to assemble the best modern criticism - broadly speaking, that of the last twenty or thirty years - and to include historic and classic essays, however :&mous, only when they are still influential and represent the best statements of their particular point of view. It will, however, be one of the functions of each editor's Introduction to sketch in the earlier history of criticism in regard to the author concerned. Each volume will attempt to strike a balance between general essays and ones on specialised aspects, or particular works, of the writer in question. And though in many instances the bulk of the articles will come from British and American sources, certain of the volumes will draw heavily on material in other European languages - most of it being translated for the first time. P. N. FURBANK A2 w.s. Introduction IN June 1822 Shelley once more became the centre of public contro­ versy. This time, however, the cause was neither the publication of a new poem, nor the circulation of a new rumour, but the confirmation of news that the poet was dead. The notes heard so many times before in reviews and reports took on a firmer tone. Leigh Hunt, a resolute friend and early admirer of Shelley, lamented in the pages of the Morning Chronicle: 'God bless him! I cannot help thinking ofhim as if he were alive as much as ever, so unearthly he always appeared to me, and so seraphical a King of the elements.' But in their August notice the Courier, one of the Tory journals, announced bluntly: 'Shelley, the writer of some infidel poetry, has been drowned, now he knows whether there is a God or no.' 1 The declarations have in common the same fervour, the fervour that drapes Shelley in the borrowed robes of either angel or atheist. For from the beginning Shelley attracted extreme comments, in just the same way as he used to stimulate them. The very mixture that is clearly marked in these comments by Hunt and the Courier writer, of almost personal abuse or moral justification, characterises nearly all of Shelley criticism, and makes him unique even among such a colourful gathering as the Romantic poets. Even today the strife still blazes. In 1950, for example, K. N. Cameron was able to write his study of Shelley's early development as social thinker and revolutionary poet, with an obstinate conviction of the rightness of the youthful writer's actions that turned a scornful eye on all who refused to confess it. He accounted for the 'power and beauty' of Queen Mab as 'the bitter and angry cry of a young revolutionary, its visionary penetration that of a man rising on the wave of a titanic historical struggle to see deep and far'. 2 Representing the alternative challenge 1 Both quotations from N.l. White, Shelley (1947) n 39o-1. a The Yotmg Shelley (New York, reprinted 1962) p. 267. 12 Introduction stands Douglas Bush, who, in the course of writing a scholarly study of the treatment of classical myth by nineteenth-century poets, could slip in some dismissive generalisations about the worth of Shelley's poetry, and facetiously offer the following critical comment on the well-known 'Life ofLife' lyric from Prometheus Unbound: At this point all good Shelleyans face to the east, and regard any attempt to discern the meaning as both prosaic and profane; those who desire more in poetry than rapturous reverie, who ask that feeling shall have direction as well as intensity, must not enter the temple with thick-soled shoes.1 The inevitable conclusion to be drawn is that the middle path for the reader of Shelley is hard to come by - you're either for him or against him, and in either case his poetry represents a peak of accomplishment, whether ofsuccess or failure. Any brief review of Shelley criticism shows that moderation has never been one of its virtues. As a result of this, the various attacks and counter-attacks have achieved almost as much fame as their subject, frequently to the point where critical accuracy has been sacrificed to anecdote. What is signi£cant, however, is that the same issues have arisen as each new critical generation has tried to decide on its attitude to Shelley. For his poetry draws attention to certain constant problems in literary theory. Shelley's own theorising, and the nature ofhis poetic practice, brought him up against the apparent critical trespasses that he was committing: the yoking together of didacticism and aestheticism; the reliance on the precise, detailed word beside the emotive, general one; the unity of the personal and the mythic, self-communion and public expression. Since the treatment of these problems tends to pursue certain definable paths, Shelley criticism does display a firm unity over the past 140 years. This pattern, and, as a result, the motives behind much subsequent interpretation, is well illustrated in the fate of his poetry during the last century.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Fearless Therefore Powerful» Sociability and Emotions in Mary Shelley’S Frankenstein
    «FEARLESS THEREFORE POWERFUL» SOCIABILITY AND EMOTIONS IN MARY SHELLEY’S FRANKENSTEIN Cristina Paoletti Università di Bologna, Dipartimento di Filosofia, [email protected] Abstract. «Fearless therefore Powerful». Sociability and Emotions in Mary Shelley’s Frankenstein This paper analyses the role played by fear as the motive of both Victor Frankenstein and his monster’s behaviour. Moving from the natural horror the monster excites, fear is mostly considered by Mary Shelley as a normal reaction, and its absence marks pathological circumstances, such as cruelty or unsympathetic and antisocial feelings. Referring to the philosophical debate on moral sympathy and to the scientific discussion on Erasmus Darwin’s account of animal instincts, Shelley also provided remarkable criticis Keywords: Enlightenment, Emotions, English Literature, Seventeenth Century. So should young SYMPATHY, in female form, Climb the tall rock, spectatress of the storm; Life's sinking wrecks with secret sighs deplore, And bleed for others' woes, Herself on shore; To friendless Virtue, gasping on the strand, Governare la paura – 2008, giugno Cristina Paoletti Bare her warm heart, her virgin arms expand1. An essay on Mary Shelley’s Frankenstein might perhaps appear an obvious choice when dealing with fear and its literary and artistic representations. Victor Frankenstein’s odd and shocking story was firstly received with dismay and disappointment and an early reviewer explained the terror produced by the novel with the folly of the author. The [author’s] dreams of insanity are embodied in the strong and striking language of the insane, and the author, notwithstanding the rationality of his preface, often leaves us in doubt whether he is not as mad as his hero.
    [Show full text]
  • Select Letters of Percy Bysshe Shelley
    ENGLISH CLÀSSICS The vignette, representing Shelleÿs house at Great Mar­ lou) before the late alterations, is /ro m a water- colour drawing by Dina Williams, daughter of Shelleÿs friend Edward Williams, given to the E ditor by / . Bertrand Payne, Esq., and probably made about 1840. SELECT LETTERS OF PERCY BYSSHE SHELLEY EDITED WITH AN INTRODUCTION BY RICHARD GARNETT NEW YORK D.APPLETON AND COMPANY X, 3, AND 5 BOND STREET MDCCCLXXXIII INTRODUCTION T he publication of a book in the series of which this little volume forms part, implies a claim on its behalf to a perfe&ion of form, as well as an attradiveness of subjeâ:, entitling it to the rank of a recognised English classic. This pretensión can rarely be advanced in favour of familiar letters, written in haste for the information or entertain­ ment of private friends. Such letters are frequently among the most delightful of literary compositions, but the stamp of absolute literary perfe&ion is rarely impressed upon them. The exceptions to this rule, in English literature at least, occur principally in the epistolary litera­ ture of the eighteenth century. Pope and Gray, artificial in their poetry, were not less artificial in genius to Cowper and Gray ; but would their un- their correspondence ; but while in the former premeditated utterances, from a literary point of department of composition they strove to display view, compare with the artifice of their prede­ their art, in the latter their no less successful cessors? The answer is not doubtful. Byron, endeavour was to conceal it. Together with Scott, and Kcats are excellent letter-writers, but Cowper and Walpole, they achieved the feat of their letters are far from possessing the classical imparting a literary value to ordinary topics by impress which they communicated to their poetry.
    [Show full text]
  • On the Rise and Progress of Popular Disaffection,” in Es- Says, Moral and Political, 2 Vols
    Notes Introduction 1. Robert Southey, “On the Rise and Progress of Popular Disaffection,” in Es- says, Moral and Political, 2 vols. (1817; London: John Murray, 1832), II, 82. The identity of Junius remained a mystery, and even Edmund Burke was suspected. For an argument that he was Sir Philip Francis, see Alvar Ellegård, Who Was Junius? (The Hague, 1962). 2. Byron, “The Vision of Judgment” in Lord Byron: The Complete Poetical Works, ed. Jerome J. McGann and Barry Weller, 7 vols. (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1980–92), VI, 309–45. 3. M. H. Abrams, Natural Supernaturalism: Tradition and Revolution in Ro- mantic Literature (New York: W. W. Norton, 1971), p. 13. 4. See Anne K. Mellor, English Romantic Irony (Cambridge: Harvard Univer- sity Press, 1980). 5. Jerome J. McGann, The Romantic Ideology: A Critical Investigation (Chicago and London: University of Chicago Press, 1983), pp. 23–24. 6. Jerome J. McGann, Towards a Literature of Knowledge (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1989), p. 39. 7. McGann, Towards a Literature of Knowledge, p. 39. 8. McGann, “Literary Pragmatics and the Editorial Horizon,” in Devils and Angels: Textual Editing and Literary Theory, ed. Philip Cohen (Charlottesville and London: University Press of Virginia, 1991), pp. 1–21 (13). 9. Marilyn Butler, “Satire and the Images of Self in the Romantic Period: The Long Tradition of Hazlitt’s Liber Amoris,” in English Satire and the Satiric Tradition, ed. Claude Rawson (Oxford: Basil Blackwell, 1984), 209–25 (209). 10. Stuart Curran, Poetic Form and British Romanticism (New York and Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1986), pp. 12–13. 11. Gary Dyer, British Satire and the Politics of Style, 1789–1832 (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1997).
    [Show full text]
  • John Keats 1 John Keats
    John Keats 1 John Keats John Keats Portrait of John Keats by William Hilton. National Portrait Gallery, London Born 31 October 1795 Moorgate, London, England Died 23 February 1821 (aged 25) Rome, Italy Occupation Poet Alma mater King's College London Literary movement Romanticism John Keats (/ˈkiːts/; 31 October 1795 – 23 February 1821) was an English Romantic poet. He was one of the main figures of the second generation of Romantic poets along with Lord Byron and Percy Bysshe Shelley, despite his work only having been in publication for four years before his death.[1] Although his poems were not generally well received by critics during his life, his reputation grew after his death, so that by the end of the 19th century he had become one of the most beloved of all English poets. He had a significant influence on a diverse range of poets and writers. Jorge Luis Borges stated that his first encounter with Keats was the most significant literary experience of his life.[2] The poetry of Keats is characterised by sensual imagery, most notably in the series of odes. Today his poems and letters are some of the most popular and most analysed in English literature. Biography Early life John Keats was born in Moorgate, London, on 31 October 1795, to Thomas and Frances Jennings Keats. There is no clear evidence of his exact birthplace.[3] Although Keats and his family seem to have marked his birthday on 29 October, baptism records give the date as the 31st.[4] He was the eldest of four surviving children; his younger siblings were George (1797–1841), Thomas (1799–1818), and Frances Mary "Fanny" (1803–1889) who eventually married Spanish author Valentín Llanos Gutiérrez.[5] Another son was lost in infancy.
    [Show full text]
  • Robert Southey, Politics, and the Year 1817 Ian Packer
    Document generated on 09/30/2021 4:56 a.m. Romanticism on the Net An open access journal devoted to British Romantic literature Robert Southey, Politics, and the Year 1817 Ian Packer Robert Southey Article abstract Number 68-69, Spring–Fall 2017 This article examines Robert Southey’s interactions with both politics and politicians in the year 1817. The publication of the sections of the Collected URI: https://id.erudit.org/iderudit/1070619ar Letters of Robert Southey covering the period 1815-21 makes possible a much DOI: https://doi.org/10.7202/1070619ar closer and more nuanced examination of how Southey responded to the controversy over the unauthorised appearance of his early radical play, Wat See table of contents Tyler, and his subsequent condemnation in the House of Commons as a “renegado.” The Collected Letters make clear that Southey’s reaction to these events became entangled with his determination to gather support for his distinctive political programme, which he believed would save the country Publisher(s) from revolution. However, Southey’s interventions in the fraught political and Université de Montréal cultural debates of 1817 only served to cement his reputation as a particularly reactionary conservative. ISSN 2563-2582 (digital) Explore this journal Cite this article Packer, I. (2017). Robert Southey, Politics, and the Year 1817. Romanticism on the Net, (68-69). https://doi.org/10.7202/1070619ar Copyright © Ian Packer, 2017 This document is protected by copyright law. Use of the services of Érudit (including reproduction) is subject to its terms and conditions, which can be viewed online. https://apropos.erudit.org/en/users/policy-on-use/ This article is disseminated and preserved by Érudit.
    [Show full text]
  • Quarterly Review
    John Wilson Croker’s Image of France in the Quarterly Review David Morphet Introduction Political developments in France provided a substantial topic for British periodicals during the first half of the nineteenth century. The most sustained comment came from the Rt Hon. John Wilson Croker, the principal contributor to the Quarterly Review (QR) on political matters over the period. His thirty or so articles on France published up to 1851 constitute a significant part of his total QR output, and are the main focus of this paper. 1 Consideration will also be given to a number of articles on France which appeared during this period in the Edinburgh Review (ER) , Fraser’s Magazine (FM) and the Westminster Review (WR) . All of these were published under the ruling convention of anonymity. Within four or five years of its foundation in 1802, the ER began to attack the policies of the Tory government. By 1809, it had sharpened its attack to include the evacuation of British forces from Corunna, the debacle of the Walcheren Campaign, and the scandal over the sales of Army commissions by the Duke of York’s mistress. The QR was founded in that year to counter the ER , and achieved a rapid success. Its first editor, William Gifford, estimated in 1812 that it was read by ‘at least 50,000 of that class whose opinions it is most important to render favourable, and whose judgment it is most expedient to set right’. 2 Its founders included the publisher John Murray and Sir Walter Scott, whose son-in-law J.
    [Show full text]
  • Walter Savage Landor - Poems
    Classic Poetry Series Walter Savage Landor - poems - Publication Date: 2004 Publisher: Poemhunter.com - The World's Poetry Archive Walter Savage Landor(30 January 1775 – 17 September 1864) an English writer and poet. His best known works were the prose Imaginary Conversations, and the poem Rose Aylmer, but the critical acclaim he received from contemporary poets and reviewers was not matched by public popularity. As remarkable as his work was, it was equaled by his rumbustious character and lively temperament. Summary of his work In a long and active life of eighty-nine years Landor produced a considerable amount of work in various genres. This can perhaps be classified into four main areas – prose, lyric poetry, political writings including epigrams and Latin. His prose and poetry have received most acclaim, but critics are divided in their preference between them. Landor’s prose is best represented by the Imaginary Conversations. He drew on a vast array of historical characters from Greek philosophers to contemporary writers and composed conversations between pairs of characters that covered areas of philosophy, politics, romance and many other topics. These exercises proved a more successful application of Landor’s natural ability for writing dialogue than his plays. Although these have many quotable passages the overall effect suffered because he never learned the art of drama. Landor wrote much sensitive and beautiful poetry. The love poems were inspired by a succession of female romantic ideals – Ione, Ianthe, Rose Aylmer and Rose Paynter. Equally sensitive are his “domestic” poems about his sister and his children. In the course of his career Landor wrote for various journals on a range of topics that interested him from anti-Pitt politics to the unification of Italy.
    [Show full text]
  • Shelley's Adonais As a Communicative Elegy
    59 Shelley's Adonais as a Communicative Elegy (Received December 26, 2002) KyushuInstituteofTechnology KeiNijibayashi Introduction Peter Sacks discusses English elegy tradition in The English Elegor from the Freudian psychoanalytical view. He interprets elegy as "the• very means and practice of substitution"(Sacks 8). He regards language as the essential raison d'etre of elegy: "The dead, like the forbidden object of a primary desire, must be separated from the poet, partly -by a veil of words"(Sacks 9). Words have the magical power of substitution for a narrator to get rid of the mentally lost. His difficulty with Adonais derives from Shelley's negation of re-creating the narrator's spiritual force by words or poetry. In A Defence of Poet7y, he defines poetic composition as an imperfect representation of ideal poetry: "when composition begins, inspiration is already on the decline, and the most glorious poetry that has ever been communicated to the world is probably a feeble shadow of the original conception of the poet."i) Inspiration "arises from within"(504) but the poet only feebly translates it into words. He simultaneously has a privilege and a flaw in realizing his own art. So composition itself is imperfect as compensation for or substitution of " pre-language" in the poet's consciousness. In this sense, poetry is inevitably an elegy, which mourns the loss of its original idea and is doubly insufficient for substituting the losses of inspiration and of the dead in an elegy. Sacks's last question highlights problems not only about the elegiac genre but also about Shelley's anxiety about poetic composition and publication: " `Adonais' surely concludes on a suicidal note, and we may wonder what measure of success to accord the poet's work of mourning.
    [Show full text]
  • Nineteenth Century Literary Manuscripts, Part 4
    Nineteenth Century Literary Manuscripts, Part 4 NINETEENTH CENTURY LITERARY MANUSCRIPTS Part 4: The Correspondence and Papers of John Gibson Lockhart (1794-1854), Editor of the Quarterly Review, from the National Library of Scotland Contents listing PUBLISHER'S NOTE CONTENTS OF REELS DETAILED LISTING EXTRACTS: On the Cockney School of Poetry When Youthful Faith has Fled Nineteenth Century Literay Manuscripts, Part 4 Publisher's Note John Gibson Lockhart (1794-1854) desrves our attention for many reasons: He was one of the most important critics of the 19th century He was Editor of The Quarterly Review He became Scott’s Boswell, writing an acknowledged masterpiece of biography He played an important part in the rise of the novel as a literary form His letters provide a detailed account of literary society in Edinburgh and London His papers are now opened to a wider audience through the publication of this microform edition. They include: 14 volumes of correspondence received by Lockhart as Editor of The Quarterly Review, 1825-1854 (NLS MSS.923-936); 3 volumes of letters from Lockhart to Whitwell Elwin, his successor as Editor (NLS MSS.145, 341 & 2262); 3 volumes of correspondence between Lockhart and Scott, 1818-1832 (NLS.MSS.142-143, & 859); 7 volumes of family letters, 1820-1854 (NLS.MSS.1552-1558); 1 volume of letters from Lockhart to Allan Cunningham about the Lives of British Painters (NLS.MS.820); and 10 volumes of literary manuscripts by Lockhart (NLS.MSS.1623-1626, 3995 & 4817-4822). The Editorial correspondence is especially rich and includes letters from Byron, Coleridge, Croker, Disraeli, Edgeworth (one entire volume and numerous other letters besides), Murray, Norton, Southey (“a willing and ready assistant in your new undertaking”), and Wordsworth.
    [Show full text]
  • Robert Southey John Spalding Gatton University of Kentucky
    The Kentucky Review Volume 4 Number 1 This issue is devoted to a catalog of an Article 8 exhibition from the W. Hugh Peal Collection in the University of Kentucky Libraries. 1982 Catalog of the Peal Exhibition: Robert Southey John Spalding Gatton University of Kentucky Follow this and additional works at: https://uknowledge.uky.edu/kentucky-review Part of the English Language and Literature Commons Right click to open a feedback form in a new tab to let us know how this document benefits you. Recommended Citation Gatton, John Spalding (1982) "Catalog of the Peal Exhibition: Robert Southey," The Kentucky Review: Vol. 4 : No. 1 , Article 8. Available at: https://uknowledge.uky.edu/kentucky-review/vol4/iss1/8 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the University of Kentucky Libraries at UKnowledge. It has been accepted for inclusion in The Kentucky Review by an authorized editor of UKnowledge. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Robert Southey An intimate of Coleridge and Wordsworth, and their neighbor at Keswick, Robert Southey (1774-1843) merits the title of "Lake mb. Poet," but being also prolix and prolific, he remains forever saddled l- with the Byronic rhyming epithet of "mouthey"; never collected, his writings would fill upwards of one hundred volumes. His longer poems, though little read today, earned the admiration of uch contemporaries as diverse as Scott, Shelley, and Macaulay. His prose, which evidences an unexpected simplicity and frankness, ater impressed even Byron as "perfect." ge Born in Bristol, Southey attended London's Westminster School, where he roomed with Charles Watkin Williams Wynn, a lifelong friend and a future Member of Parliament.
    [Show full text]
  • Romantic Periodicals and the Invention of the Living Author
    University of Pennsylvania ScholarlyCommons Publicly Accessible Penn Dissertations 2016 Romantic Periodicals and the Invention of the Living Author Christine Marie Woody University of Pennsylvania, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://repository.upenn.edu/edissertations Recommended Citation Woody, Christine Marie, "Romantic Periodicals and the Invention of the Living Author" (2016). Publicly Accessible Penn Dissertations. 2102. https://repository.upenn.edu/edissertations/2102 This paper is posted at ScholarlyCommons. https://repository.upenn.edu/edissertations/2102 For more information, please contact [email protected]. Romantic Periodicals and the Invention of the Living Author Abstract ROMANTIC PERIODICALS AND THE INVENTION OF THE LIVING AUTHOR Christine Marie Woody Michael Gamer This dissertation asks how the burgeoning market of magazines, book reviews, and newspapers shapes the practice and meaning of authorship during the Romantic period. Surveying the innovations in and conventions of British periodical culture between 1802 and 1830, this study emphasizes the importance of four main periodicals—the Edinburgh Review, Quarterly Review, London Magazine, and Blackwood’s Edinburgh Magazine—to the period’s understanding of what it means to be, or read, an author who is still living. In it, I argue that British periodicals undertook a project to theorize, narrativize, and regulate the deceptively simple concept of a living author. Periodicals confronted the inadequacy of their critical methods in dealing with the living and came to define the “living author” as a disturbing model for the everyday person—an encouragement to self-display and a burden on public attention. Through their engagement with this disruptive figure, periodical writers eventually found in it a potential model for their own contingent, anonymous work, and embraced the self-actualizing possibilities that this reviled figure unexpectedly offered.
    [Show full text]
  • John Scott, John Taylor, and Keats's Reputation John R
    Lehigh University Lehigh Preserve Theses and Dissertations 1963 John Scott, John Taylor, and Keats's reputation John R. Gustavson Lehigh University Follow this and additional works at: https://preserve.lehigh.edu/etd Part of the Arts and Humanities Commons Recommended Citation Gustavson, John R., "John Scott, John Taylor, and Keats's reputation" (1963). Theses and Dissertations. 3152. https://preserve.lehigh.edu/etd/3152 This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by Lehigh Preserve. It has been accepted for inclusion in Theses and Dissertations by an authorized administrator of Lehigh Preserve. For more information, please contact [email protected]. .•••·· -·"' -· '1/- .~ •. -. ..... '·--·-· -- .. - ' . .. ·~ ... - ... ·-··--·--- ·-·--·-··-~•-•¥••----., ...... .. ' ·:.0.--:'_• _ _.., ___•1-' .......""T,b.-~-~~f'Mt,'lllr!iill. 1"• ... ,~'"!".~·· -- . ~..... .... ,Ill\ ,, •• ,":• -r---1 'I • - .. , .•. - ... -----fQS' ·--·~· ....... 1:·.·" ...... ~ , • ' ..,.: .tf>•Z • .... -..... ' ........ -.--···· ... _ .. _ ' i .I JOHN SCOTT,.. JOHN TAYLOR, AND KEATS'S REPUTATION - by John Raymond Gustavson A THESIS Presented to the Graduate Faculty of Lehigh University in candidacy for the Degree of Master of Arts 1, ·• Lehigh University ··,~-- 1963 -•• · l• -- ·.:·_ .;·~: ..:,.:... _. - -- - --· -- ·---..: --;---:•--=---· -, ~ _., --.~ .... •.-' ... ------- ,.1 ... !" ·.,i .1 l,! ; ': ·)1 :i - ' -~·-· ~ _ _.,.,::_ '. -• .:,•,,", .,_ '' - . ' ... -.. ~.:-_•;,." -, ii ... • '~,:~ ...... ··rt· • -···-•-Y: .. --~--,-•,:·,·,:-~:.• .~,' .,~
    [Show full text]