Health Indicators 1

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Health Indicators 1 Health Indicators 1. Population 1-01. Population Pyramid in EO Area Description Source: 2011 Census, Statistics Canada Updated in February 2013 English- English- French- English- Multiple Region French NOL* NOL French-NOL Responses N % N % N % N % Canada 639540 144685 22.6% 396330 62.0% 74430 11.6% 24095 3.8% Ontario 287290 46605 16.2% 219425 76.4% 13645 4.7% 7615 2.7% EO Area 3815 3130 82.0% 465 12.2% 125 3.3% 85 2.2% UC-SDG* 2175 1705 78.4% 335 15.4% 70 3.2% 55 2.5% UC-PR 1640 1425 86.9% 130 7.9% 55 3.4% 30 1.8% Cornwall City 1205 945 78.4% 195 16.2% 40 3.3% 30 2.5% Stormont County* 280 235 83.9% 35 12.5% 5 1.8% 5 1.8% Dundas County 205 130 63.4% 50 24.4% 15 7.3% 0 0.0% Glengarry County 475 395 83.2% 50 10.5% 10 2.1% 20 4.2% Prescott County 605 495 81.8% 60 9.9% 30 5.0% 15 2.5% Russell County 1045 930 89.0% 65 6.2% 30 2.9% 15 1.4% Alexandria Office 755 640 84.8% 75 9.9% 20 2.6% 25 3.3% Casselman Office 765 660 86.3% 65 8.5% 25 3.3% 10 1.3% Cornwall Office 1775 1415 79.7% 265 14.9% 50 2.8% 50 2.8% Hawkesbury Office 790 660 83.5% 75 9.5% 35 4.4% 20 2.5% Rockland Office 665 600 90.2% 40 6.0% 10 1.5% 5 0.8% Winchester Office 300 210 70.0% 60 20.0% 20 6.7% 0 0.0% South Stormont 185 155 83.8% 25 13.5% 0 0.0% 5 2.7% North Stormont 95 80 84.2% 10 10.5% 5 5.3% 0 0.0% South Dundas 75 45 60.0% 20 26.7% 5 6.7% 0 0.0% North Dundas 130 85 65.4% 30 23.1% 10 7.7% 0 0.0% South Glengarry 290 235 81.0% 35 12.1% 5 1.7% 15 5.2% North Glengarry 185 160 86.5% 15 8.1% 5 2.7% 5 2.7% Hawkesbury 250 205 82.0% 25 10.0% 15 6.0% 10 4.0% East Hawkesbury 80 60 75.0% 10 12.5% 5 6.3% 0 0.0% Champlain 130 105 80.8% 10 7.7% 10 7.7% 5 3.8% Alfred & Plantagenet 145 125 86.2% 15 10.3% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% The Nation Municipality 185 165 89.2% 15 8.1% 5 2.7% 5 2.7% Casselman 70 55 78.6% 5 7.1% 5 7.1% 0 0.0% Clarence-Rockland 520 475 91.3% 25 4.8% 10 1.9% 5 1.0% Russell TP 270 235 87.0% 20 7.4% 10 3.7% 5 1.9% Multiple English-French English-NOL* French-NOL* English- Region responses N % N % N % N % Canada 1162370 131205 11.3% 875135 75.3% 109700 9.4% 46330 4.0% Ontario 565270 37955 6.7% 509105 90.1% 6370 1.1% 11845 2.1% EO Area 4315 3175 73.6% 900 20.9% 100 2.3% 135 3.1% UC-SDG* 2275 1515 66.6% 650 28.6% 30 1.3% 70 3.1% UC-PR 2040 1660 81.4% 250 12.3% 70 3.4% 65 3.2% Cornwall City 1285 830 64.6% 405 31.5% 20 1.6% 35 2.7% Stormont County* 230 165 71.7% 65 28.3% 0 0.0% 10 4.3% Dundas County 190 95 50.0% 85 44.7% 5 2.6% 0 0.0% Glengarry County 570 435 76.3% 105 18.4% 5 0.9% 25 4.4% Prescott County 695 520 74.8% 110 15.8% 25 3.6% 35 5.0% Russell County 1345 1130 84.0% 135 10.0% 45 3.3% 25 1.9% Alexandria Office 945 735 77.8% 170 18.0% 5 0.5% 35 3.7% Casselman Office 870 705 81.0% 125 14.4% 10 1.1% 15 1.7% Cornwall Office 1845 1240 67.2% 540 29.3% 25 1.4% 60 3.3% Hawkesbury Office 990 765 77.3% 150 15.2% 25 2.5% 40 4.0% Rockland Office 845 710 84.0% 75 8.9% 45 5.3% 15 1.8% Winchester Office 270 150 55.6% 110 40.7% 5 1.9% 5 1.9% South Stormont 150 110 73.3% 40 26.7% 0 0.0% 5 3.3% North Stormont 80 55 68.8% 25 31.3% 0 0.0% 5 6.3% South Dundas 90 40 44.4% 45 50.0% 5 5.6% 0 0.0% North Dundas 100 55 55.0% 40 40.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% South Glengarry 330 245 74.2% 70 21.2% 5 1.5% 15 4.5% North Glengarry 240 190 79.2% 35 14.6% 0 0.0% 10 4.2% Hawkesbury 320 230 71.9% 55 17.2% 5 1.6% 25 7.8% East Hawkesbury 70 45 64.3% 10 14.3% 10 14.3% 5 7.1% Champlain 160 130 81.3% 25 15.6% 5 3.1% 5 3.1% Alfred & Plantagenet 145 115 79.3% 20 13.8% 5 3.4% 0 0.0% The Nation Municipality 295 245 83.1% 40 13.6% 0 0.0% 5 1.7% Casselman 90 80 88.9% 5 5.6% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% Clarence-Rockland 700 595 85.0% 55 7.9% 40 5.7% 15 2.1% Russell TP 260 210 80.8% 35 13.5% 5 1.9% 5 1.9% Multiple English English-NOL* French-NOL* English- Region Responses N % N % N % Canada 148055 40280 27.2% 49905 33.7% 56385 38.1% 1485 1.0% Ontario 44190 6970 15.8% 15600 35.3% 21270 48.1% 350 0.8% EO Area 435 75 17.2% 130 29.9% 230 52.9% 5 1.1% UC-SDG* 220 30 13.6% 60 27.3% 130 59.1% 5 2.3% UC-PR 215 45 20.9% 70 32.6% 100 46.5% 0 0.0% Cornwall City 120 20 16.7% 35 29.2% 60 50.0% 0 0.0% Stormont County* 15 5 33.3% 0 0.0% 5 33.3% 0 0.0% Dundas County 20 0 0.0% 5 25.0% 15 75.0% 0 0.0% Glengarry County 65 5 7.7% 15 23.1% 50 76.9% 0 0.0% Prescott County 85 10 11.8% 25 29.4% 50 58.8% 0 0.0% Russell County 130 25 19.2% 45 34.6% 50 38.5% 0 0.0% Alexandria Office 100 20 20.0% 20 20.0% 60 60.0% 0 0.0% Casselman Office 95 20 21.1% 30 31.6% 40 42.1% 0 0.0% Cornwall Office 180 30 16.7% 45 25.0% 95 52.8% 0 0.0% Hawkesbury Office 110 20 18.2% 30 27.3% 55 50.0% 0 0.0% Rockland Office 75 10 13.3% 25 33.3% 35 46.7% 0 0.0% Winchester Office 30 5 16.7% 5 16.7% 20 66.7% 0 0.0% South Stormont 5 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% North Stormont 10 5 50.0% 0 0.0% 5 50.0% 0 0.0% South Dundas 10 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 10 100.0% 0 0.0% North Dundas 10 0 0.0% 5 50.0% 5 50.0% 0 0.0% South Glengarry 45 5 11.1% 10 22.2% 30 66.7% 0 0.0% North Glengarry 20 0 0.0% 5 25.0% 20 100.0% 0 0.0% Hawkesbury 35 10 28.6% 5 14.3% 15 42.9% 0 0.0% East Hawkesbury 20 0 0.0% 10 50.0% 10 50.0% 0 0.0% Champlain 15 0 0.0% 5 33.3% 15 100.0% 0 0.0% Alfred & Plantagenet 15 0 0.0% 5 33.3% 10 66.7% 0 0.0% The Nation Municipality 25 10 40.0% 5 20.0% 5 20.0% 0 0.0% Casselman 5 0 0.0% 5 100.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% Clarence-Rockland 60 10 16.7% 20 33.3% 25 41.7% 0 0.0% Russell TP 40 5 12.5% 15 37.5% 20 50.0% 0 0.0% Total English only French only English-French Neither E nor F Report Population N % N % N % N % Canada 33121175 22564665 68.1% 4165015 12.6% 5795570 17.5% 595920 1.8% Ontario 12722060 10984360 86.3% 42980 0.3% 1395805 11.0% 298920 2.3% EO Area 193780 82890 42.8% 12305 6.3% 98350 50.8% 230 0.1% UC-SDG* 109440 65385 59.7% 1525 1.4% 42360 38.7% 165 0.2% UC-PR 84340 17505 20.8% 10780 12.8% 55990 66.4% 65 0.1% Cornwall City 45395 25185 55.5% 510 1.1% 19590 43.2% 110 0.2% Stormont County* 19185 12260 63.9% 225 1.2% 6690 34.9% 5 0.0% Dundas County 21770 18200 83.6% 50 0.2% 3505 16.1% 15 0.1% Glengarry County 23090 9745 42.2% 735 3.2% 12575 54.5% 35 0.2% Prescott County 31220 4550 14.6% 5650 18.1% 20990 67.2% 30 0.1% Russell County 53110 12950 24.4% 5125 9.6% 34990 65.9% 30 0.1% Alexandria Office 41360 15780 38.2% 2450 5.9% 23075 55.8% 45 0.1% Casselman Office 45955 13115 28.5% 4790 10.4% 28015 61.0% 25 0.1% Cornwall Office 77675 43350 55.8% 1010 1.3% 33170 42.7% 140 0.2% Hawkesbury Office 42760 6775 15.8% 7210 16.9% 28735 67.2% 35 0.1% Rockland Office 31925 6235 19.5% 3780 11.8% 21890 68.6% 20 0.1% Winchester Office 28500 22010 77.2% 205 0.7% 6260 22.0% 20 0.1% South Stormont 12455 8450 67.8% 70 0.6% 3935 31.6% 0 0.0% North Stormont 6730 3810 56.6% 155 2.3% 2755 40.9% 5 0.1% South Dundas 10675 9355 87.6% 10 0.1% 1305 12.2% 5 0.0% North Dundas 11095 8845 79.7% 40 0.4% 2200 19.8% 10 0.1% South Glengarry 13095 5905 45.1% 275 2.1% 6890 52.6% 25 0.2% North Glengarry 9995 3840 38.4% 460 4.6% 5685 56.9% 10 0.1% Hawkesbury 10355 960 9.3% 2415 23.3% 6965 67.3% 15 0.1% East Hawkesbury 3335 565 16.9% 515 15.4% 2250 67.5% 5 0.1% Champlain 8510 1730 20.3% 1075 12.6% 5695 66.9% 5 0.1% Alfred & Plantagenet 9020 1295 14.4% 1645 18.2% 6080 67.4% 5 0.1% The Nation Municipality 11540 2225 19.3% 1560 13.5% 7745 67.1% 5 0.0% Casselman 3500 320 9.1% 585 16.7% 2590 74.0% 0 0.0% Clarence-Rockland 22905 4940 21.6% 2135 9.3% 15810 69.0% 15 0.1% Russell TP 15165 5465 36.0% 845 5.6% 8845 58.3% 10 0.1% Total English only French only English-French Neither E nor F Report Population N % N % N % N % Canada 33121175 24662900 74.5% 7507890 22.7% 367635 1.1% 582755 1.8% Ontario 12722065 11844580 93.1% 500270 3.9% 84230 0.7% 292980 2.3% EO Area 193780 114085 58.9% 78005 40.3% 1480 0.8% 215 0.1% UC-SDG* 109440 85285 77.9% 23235 21.2% 765 0.7% 155 0.1% UC-PR 84340 28800 34.1% 54770 64.9% 715 0.8% 60 0.1% Cornwall City 45395 33860 74.6% 10995 24.2% 430 0.9% 105 0.2% Stormont County* 19185 15675 81.7% 3430 17.9% 70 0.4% 5 0.0% Dundas County 21780 20415 93.7% 1285 5.9% 60 0.3% 10 0.0% Glengarry County 23090 15330 66.4% 7525 32.6% 210 0.9% 25 0.1% Prescott County 31225 8465 27.1% 22455 71.9% 280 0.9% 30 0.1% Russell County 53120 20330 38.3% 32310 60.8% 440 0.8% 30 0.1% Alexandria Office 41360 24020 58.1% 16945 41.0% 350 0.8% 40 0.1% Casselman Office 45965 19655 42.8% 25985 56.5% 285 0.6% 25 0.1% Cornwall Office 77675 58845 75.8% 18065 23.3% 620 0.8% 130 0.2% Hawkesbury Office 42765 12110 28.3% 30230 70.7% 390 0.9% 40 0.1% Rockland Office 31935 9970 31.2% 21690 67.9% 255 0.8% 20 0.1% Winchester Office 28510 25460 89.3% 2930 10.3% 90 0.3% 15 0.1% South Stormont 12455 10630 85.3% 1785 14.3% 40 0.3% 0 0.0% North Stormont 6730 5045 75.0% 1645 24.4% 30 0.4% 5 0.1% South Dundas 10680 10190 95.4% 455 4.3% 25 0.2% 5 0.0% North Dundas 11100 10225 92.1% 830 7.5% 35 0.3% 5 0.0% South Glengarry 13095 9310 71.1% 3640 27.8% 120 0.9% 20 0.2% North Glengarry 9995 6020 60.2% 3885 38.9% 90 0.9% 5 0.1% Hawkesbury 10350 1910 18.5% 8280 80.0% 150 1.4% 15 0.1% East Hawkesbury 3335 1265 37.9% 2025 60.7% 40 1.2% 5 0.1% Champlain 8515 3165 37.2% 5290 62.1% 55 0.6% 5 0.1% Alfred & Plantagenet 9025 2125 23.5% 6860 76.0% 35 0.4% 5 0.1% The Nation Municipality 11540 3645 31.6% 7775 67.4% 110 1.0% 10 0.1% Casselman 3500 630 18.0% 2845 81.3% 25 0.7% 0 0.0% Clarence-Rockland 22910 7845 34.2% 14830 64.7% 220 1.0% 15 0.1% Russell TP 15170 8210 54.1% 6860 45.2% 85 0.6% 5 0.0% 1-02.
Recommended publications
  • Eastern Ontario Counties
    Focus Group on Maternal-Newborn Health Services and Programs EASTERN ONTARIO COUNTIES Prepared by France Morin and Debbie Aylward, Perinatal Consultants Champlain Maternal Newborn Regional Program INTRODUCTION The Champlain Maternal Newborn Regional Program (CMNRP) is conducting focus groups as part of one of its strategic priorities focused on enhancing the transition of maternal-newborn care from hospital to community. The focus groups are one of the activities of the CMNRP Mapping Maternal Newborn Services Workgroup. CMNRP is pleased to present a summary report of key findings and recommendations from the focus group that was conducted at the Eastern Ontario Health Unit in Casselman on October 26 th , 2016 from 13:30 to 16:00. A total of 19 health care providers from various organizations that provide maternal- newborn health services and/or programs 1 in the Eastern Ontario Counties participated. Those include: Stormont, Dundas, Glengarry, Prescott/Russell and Akwesasne. The purpose of this focus group was to: 1) confirm and identify additional maternal-newborn health services and/or programs currently available in this community; 2) explore the views of participants about the strengths, challenges and gaps of existing services and programs in relation to access, navigation and continuity of supports; and 3) identify opportunities for improvement and make recommendations to improve the current system. The focus group was divided into four parts. Notes were taken and the session was audio-recorded in order to accurately capture participants’ contributions. Information from the notes and the recording were reviewed, collated and presented in this report. PART 1 – Document Current Maternal-Newborn Health Services & Programs Prior to attending the focus group, participants received a list of maternal-newborn health services and programs that were identified by CMNRP through searches of portals ( thehealthline.ca ; 211.ontario ) and websites of organizations as well as telephone calls with key informants.
    [Show full text]
  • Escribe Agenda Package
    TOWNSHIP OF CHAMPLAIN REGULAR MEETING April 8, 2021 Electronic Participation 1. OPENING - 7:00 P.M. Call to order. 2. DISCLOSURE OF PECUNIARY INTEREST (on any items that appear on the agenda) 3. ADOPTION OF AGENDA 4. PRESENTATION BY COUNCIL 5. PRESENTATION − COMMITTEES / CONSULTANTS 6. DEPUTATION 7. STAFF REPORTS 7.1. Planning 7.1.1. On-Going Planning Projects 7.1.2. Zoning By-Law Amendment Application Z-01-2021 - Gestion Par-5 7.1.3. Land Severance Application B-016-2021 - Cameron Rodger 7.1.4. Report PED-04-2021 - 2021 Temporary Patio Extension 7.2. ADOPTION OF PLANNING BY-LAWS 7.2.1. By-Law 2021-19 - to amend Zoning By-Law 2000-75 (Gestion Par-5 - Z-01-2021) 7.2.2. By-Law 2021-34 - to designate road widening as public highway (Fitzpatrick Road) 7.2.3. By-Law 2021-35 - to designate road widening as public highway (Longueuil Street) 7.3. Administration 7.3.1. Administration Report AD-05-21 - Update on COVID-19 7.4. Finance 7.4.1. Accounts 7.4.2. Memorandum - MNP to acquire subset of Deloitte 7.5. Fire Department 7.5.1. Fire - Monthly Report - March 2021 7.5.2. 2020-2021 Fire Safety Grant 7.6. Parks & Recreation 7.6.1. REC Monthly Report - March 2021 7.6.2. REC Report REC-03-21 - Agreement with Fisheries and Oceans - Lease of L'Orignal Marina 7.6.3. REC Report REC-04-21 - LED Lighting Retrofit for Vankleek Hill Community Centre/Area 7.7. Public Works 7.7.1.
    [Show full text]
  • Township of East Hawkesbury Zoning By-Law: November, 2020 NOVATECH TABLE of CONTENTS
    Township of East Hawkesbury Zoning By-law No. _____ Draft November 2020 NOVATECH Engineers, Planners & Landscape Architects Suite 200, 240 Michael Cowpland Dr. Ottawa, Ontario K2M 1P6 tel: (613) 254-9643 fax: (613) 254-5867 www.novatech-eng.com THE CORPORATION OF TOWNSHIP OF EAST HAWKESBURY ZONING BY-LAW No. _________ A by-law to regulate the use of lands and the character, location and the use of buildings and structures in Township of East Hawkesbury WHEREAS the Planning Act, R.S.O., 1990, Chapter P.13, as amended, provides that the council of a municipal corporation may pass by-laws to regulate the use of land and the character, location and use of buildings and structures; NOW THEREFORE, the Council of the Corporation of Township of East Hawkesbury enacts as follows: 1 Township of East Hawkesbury Zoning By-law: November, 2020 NOVATECH TABLE OF CONTENTS SECTION 1 APPLICATION AND INTERPRETATION .......................................................... 5 1.1 Title of By-law ...............................................................................................................5 1.2 Scope of By-law............................................................................................................5 1.3 Interpretation of By-law .................................................................................................5 1.4 Schedule to By-law .......................................................................................................6 1.5 Zoning Administrator ....................................................................................................6
    [Show full text]
  • Table of Contents
    OFFICIAL PLAN United Counties of Prescott and Russell Planning Department 59 Court Street P.O. Box 304 L’Orignal, Ontario K0B 1K0 Tel: (800) 667-6307 Fax: (613) 675-1007 www.prescott-russell.on.ca OFFICE CONSOLIDATION - May 2017 Official Plan - United Counties of Prescott and Russell Office Consolidation – May 2017 Table of Contents 1 INTRODUCTION __________________________________ 7 1.1 PLANNING AREA ______________________________________________ 7 1.2 PURPOSE AND STRUCTURE OF THE OFFICIAL PLAN ________________ 8 1.2.1 Purpose of the Official Plan ________________________________ 8 1.2.2 Title and Components of the Official Plan _____________________ 8 1.2.3 Political and Administrative Framework ______________________ 10 1.2.4 Provincial Policy Statement _______________________________ 10 1.3 PLANNING PERIOD ____________________________________________ 11 2 SUSTAINABLE COMMUNITIES _____________________ 13 2.1 INTRODUCTION _______________________________________________ 13 2.1.1 Population, Housing Units and Employment Forecasts __________ 13 2.1.2 Growth Targets ________________________________________ 16 2.1.3 Objectives ____________________________________________ 19 2.2 URBAN POLICY AREA _________________________________________ 20 2.2.1 General ______________________________________________ 20 2.2.2 Urban Policy Area Boundaries _____________________________ 20 2.2.3 Urban Policy Area Boundary Expansions ____________________ 21 2.2.4 Development on Adjacent Land ____________________________ 22 2.2.5 Water and Sewer Services ________________________________
    [Show full text]
  • ONTARIO COURT of JUSTICE :';;'~~";;~ "~+'«L'
    Enbridge Pipelines Inc. Schedule A - Six Nation - Statement of Claim Line 10 Westover Segment Replacement Project Filed on October 14, 2016 OH-001-2016 File OF-Fac-Oil-E101-2015-09 0201 Page 1 of 39 \ Court File No. 406/95 __/ J ., rd, =J LOt d-oD[) ONTARIO COURT OF JUSTICE :';;'~~";;~ " ~+'«l' . (GENERAL DIVISION) ~ ~ ~l - -(13{\Jb-:.l'}f) .B.AR~ARA J. DA WS N ,.. _.... ,, .. '-U:"" 8 E TWEEN: w: : ·. ' ·: ·-----1~_ THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF CANADA F/J,' :.::_. ______ 19_ and HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN IN RIGHT OF ONTARIO GREFFiE~i LOCAL. COUR DE L'ONTARIO ION . stft;; Defendants AMENDED STATEMENT OF CLAIM TO THE DEFENDANTS A LEGAL PROCEEDING HAS BEEN COMMENCED AGAINST YOU by the plaintiff. The claim made against you is set out in the following pages. IF YOU WISH TO DEFEND THIS PROCEEDING, you or an Ontario lawyer acting for you must prepare a statement of defence in Form 18A prescribed by the Rules of Civil Procedure, serve it upon the plaintiff's lawyer or, where the plaintiff does not have a lawyer, serve it on the plaintiff, and file it, with proof of service, in this court office, WITHIN TWENTY DAYS after this statement of claim is served on you, if you are served in Ontario. If you are served in another province or territory of Canada or in the United States of America, the period for serving and filing your statement of defence is forty days. If you are served outside Canada and the United States .of America, the pe~iod ··';.1' is s1·xty days • AJ._'ff-:: ..,__, :::!.Jt-::•r: •• - 0{ f//rJI' c:•''•• :y:...,;, l /PI/:5 P.,,..,..r r.·.r:-n :-· :•-:: tl.
    [Show full text]
  • Transportation Impact Assessment
    CITY OF CLARENCE-ROCKLAND EXPANSION LANDS SECONDARY PLAN TRANSPORTATION IMPACT ASSESSMENT Report No. 01-2019 June 2019 A000817 CONTACT Gordon Scobie [email protected] T 613-860-2462 ext. 6663 CIMA CANADA INC. (CIMA+) 110–240 Catherine Street, Ottawa, ON K2P 2G8 T 613-860-2462 F 613-860-1870 cima.ca June 2019 Table of Contents 1. Introduction .......................................................................................................... 1 Planning Context ......................................................................................................1 Provincial Planning .....................................................................................................2 County Planning .........................................................................................................2 Municipal Planning Context .........................................................................................2 Study Area .................................................................................................................3 2. Existing Conditions .............................................................................................. 4 Study Area Road Network ........................................................................................4 Study Area Intersections ..........................................................................................5 Existing Active Transportation ................................................................................7 Pedestrian Facilities ....................................................................................................7
    [Show full text]
  • Appendix 9-1 Municipal and Regional Authorities and Emergency
    CA PDF Page 1 of 35 Energy East Pipeline Ltd. Energy East Project Consolidated Application Volume 9: Community Engagement Appendix 9-1 Municipal and Regional Authorities and Emergency Response Stakeholders May 2016 CA PDF Page 2 of 35 Appendix 9-1 Energy East Pipeline Ltd. Engaged Municipalities and Emergency Consolidated Application Response Stakeholders Table 9-1: Engaged Municipalities and Regional Authorities Engaged Municipalities and Regional Authorities – Alberta Alberta Association of Municipal Districts & Counties (AAMDC) Alberta Rural Municipalities Administrators Association (ARMAA) Alberta Urban Municipalities Association (AUMA) City of Camrose City of Medicine Hat County of Newell County of Paintearth County of Stettler Cypress County Flagstaff County MD of Acadia MD of Provost MD of Wainwright Special Areas Board Town of Castor Town of Coronation Town of Daysland Town of Hanna Town of Hardisty Town of Killam Town of Oyen Town of Provost Town of Sedgewick Town of Vermilion Town of Viking Town of Wainwright Village of Alliance Village of Amisk Village of Cereal Village of Consort Village of Czar Village of Empress Village of Forestburg Village of Galahad Village of Halkirk Village of Heisler Village of Hughenden Village of Lougheed Village of Strome May 2016 Page 1 of 34 CA PDF Page 3 of 35 Appendix 9-1 Engaged Municipalities and Emergency Energy East Pipeline Ltd. Response Stakeholders Consolidated Application Table 9-1: Engaged Municipalities and Regional Authorities (cont’d) Engaged Municipalities and Regional Authorities
    [Show full text]
  • Hawkesbury CIP Draft Report6
    Socio-Economic Benefits Study Hawkesbury CIP Lagoons Remediation Town of Hawkesbury December PLANNING & URBAN DESIGN 2007 Socio-Economic Benefits Study Hawkesbury CIP Lagoons Remediation Prepared for: Town of Hawkesbury Prepared by: McSweeney & Associates 900 Greenbank Road, Suite 201 Ottawa, Ontario K2J 1S8 FoTenn Consultants Inc. 223 McLeod Street Ottawa, Ontario K2P 0Z8 T: 613.730.5709 F: 613.730.1136 December www.FoTenn.com 2007 CONTENTS 1. INTRODUCTION ......................................................................... 1 1.1.Background ...........................................................................................1 1.2.Purpose ..................................................................................................1 1.3.Approach ................................................................................................1 2. ASSUMPTIONS ..............................................................................3 3. EXISTING CONDITIONS ...............................................................5 3.1. Community Context ..............................................................................5 3.2. Site Context ...........................................................................................8 3.3. Policy and Regulatory Context ...............................................................9 4. MARKET ASSESSMENT ................................................................ 13 4.1. Market Supply .....................................................................................13
    [Show full text]
  • Meeting Agenda
    SOUTH NATION CONSERVATION DE LA NATION SUD 38 rue Victoria Street, Finch, ON KOC1KO Tel: 613-984-2948 Fax:613-984-2872 Toll Free: 1-877-984-2948 www.nation.on.ca Board of Directors Meeting Agenda Date: April 18th, 2019 Time: 9:00 am Location: Watershed Room, SNC Address: 38 Victoria Street, Finch, ON KOC 1KO Note: Source Protection Authority Meeting Immediately following Board meeting SOUTH NATION CONSERVATION DE LA NATION SUD Board of Directors Meeting Agenda April 18th, 2019 at 9:00 am 1. Chair's Remarks a. Conservation Ontario Meeting 4-7 2. Approval of SNC Board of Directors Main and Supplemental Agendas 3. Declaration of Conflict of Interest 4. Recognition for Years of Service: Ronda 8-9 • Cheyene Brunei, 5 Years Philip Duncan, 5 Years • Michel Leger, 10 Years 5. SNC Project Update - Powerpoint Presentation: Staff 6. Approval of: a. Board of Directors meeting minutes of March 21st, 2019 10-22 7. New Business: a. Update: Environmental Bill of Rights Postings Regarding Conservation Authorities: Angela 23-25 b. Request for Approval: Agreement with Association of Municipal Clerks and Treasurers of Ontario: Angela 26 c. Request for Approval: 2019 SNC Emergency Preparedness Plans: Sandra 27 d. Request for Approval: 201 9 SNC Fee Structure for Tree Seedlings: Cheyene 28-31 e. Request for Approval: Flood Risk Mapping: Sandra 32-33 f. Request for Approval: 201 9-2020 National Disaster Mitigation Program: Sandra 34-36 g. Request for Approval: Funding Applications, Infrastructure: Jason 37-38 -^ SOUTH NATION ^ CONSERVATION DE LA NATION SUD h. Request for Approval: Funding Applications, Education: John 39 Update: Leitrim Wetland: John 40-42 j.
    [Show full text]
  • Township of Alfred and Plantagenet Agenda Regular Meeting
    TOWNSHIP OF ALFRED AND PLANTAGENET AGENDA REGULAR MEETING Tuesday, September 7, 2021, 7:00 P.M. ELECTRONIC PARTICIPATION Pages 1. CALL TO ORDER 2. ADOPTION OF THE AGENDA 3. DISCLOSURES OF PECUNIARY INTERESTS 4. MAYOR’S REPORT 5. CONSENT AGENDA 5.1. Adoption of the minutes of the regular Council meeting held on June 1, 2021. 1 5.2. Adoption of the minutes of the regular Council meeting held on August 17, 34 2021. 5.3. Adoption of the minutes of the special Council meeting held on August 17, 58 2021. 5.4. Accounts payables as of September 1, 2021. 64 5.5. BUILDING - C-08-2021 - Building permits for the month of August 2021. 96 5.6. CLERK - By-law 2021-60 to authorize the use of an alternative voting method, the use of French in forms and notices and to add provisions to hold an advanced voting </span> 5.7. CLERK - By-law 2021-61 to authorize the execution of a service agreement with Intelivote Systems Inc. 5.8. MUNICIPAL DRAINS - Report from the Drainage Superintendent for the month 100 of August 2021. 6. COMMITTEES/DEPARTMENT REPORTS 6.1. FINANCES - F-15-2021 - Cancellations, reductions and/or reimbursements of 102 taxes in accordance with sections 357 & 358 of the Municipal Act, 2001. 6.2. PLANNING - URB-30-2021 -Request for authorization Luc Lamoureux. 106 B-069-2021 6.3. PLANNING - URB-31-2021 - Request for authorization Tina Stamatina 113 Arvanitis. B-072-2021 6.4. PLANNING - URB-32-2-21 - Robertson Framing inc. 122 B-073-2019 6.5.
    [Show full text]
  • INCOME SPLITTING: IS IT TIME to RE-VISIT a 1966 Negative Effect on Canada’S Economy
    TAX Published twice monthly 2017 Issue No. 16 — August 25, 2017 IN THIS ISSUE Commentary .................................... 1 Organisation for Economic Co-Operation and Recent Government Publications . 3 Development (OECD) .......................... 6 Supreme Court Appeals .......................... 3 Case Law Update ............................... 6 News Releases ................................. 3 McCarthy Tétrault Commentary Update to Canada Tax Service, Release 1629 . 8 Notice to Industry: Final List of Designated Regions for 2016 Under the Livestock Tax Deferral Provision ......................... 3 COMMENTARY of private corporations). We heartily agree with such criticisms. These proposals, if implemented, will — without a doubt — have a INCOME SPLITTING: IS IT TIME TO RE-VISIT A 1966 negative effect on Canada’s economy. CANADIAN TAX REFORM IDEA? Notwithstanding, the purpose of this article is to explore the other The following article was written by Kim G C Moody, FCA, TEP, side of the argument of one of the proposals: Income splitting. and Kenneth Keung, CA, CPA (CO, USA), CFP, LLB, MTAX, TEP, What is income splitting? An example is the paying of dividends to Directors, Canadian Tax Advisory at Moodys Gartner, dated family shareholders (active or non-active), which often results in August 9, 2017. a reduced overall family tax burden as compared to the situation where dividends were simply paid to the active shareholder. Is On July 18, 2017, a blockbuster package of proposed tax law income splitting really that offensive and unfair as suggested by changes (the “proposals”) aimed at private corporations and our government? their shareholders, was released by the Department of Finance. The proposed changes target common tax management practices A typical private business is often started and capitalized with available to private business owners, such as income splitting family assets.
    [Show full text]
  • Annual Report 2 Contents Table of Table 2012
    ANNUAL REPORT 2 TABLE OF A NEW CORPORATE BRAND FOR A NEW HOSPITAL 4-5 MISSION | VISION | VALUES 5 CONTENTS 3 REPORT OF THE CHAIR OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS 6 REPORT OF THE CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER 7 REPORT OF THE RETIRING CHIEF OF STAFF 8 2012-2013 BOARD OF DIRECTORS 9 COMPASSION: A VIBRANT TESTIMONY! 10 -11 INNOVATION: TELEMEDECINE SERVING PATIENTS! 12-13 EXCELLENCE: SUPERIOR QUALITY STANDARDS! 14-15 ROCKLAND AND CASSELMAN… SERVING OUR COMMUNITIES! 16-17 2012 . 2013 FINANCIAL STATEMENT 18 2012 . 2013 STATISTICS 19 2012 . 2013 ANNUAL REPORT 2012 . 2013 ANNUAL REPORT HAWKESBURY GENERAL HOSPITAL FOUNDATION WORD OF THE CHAIR OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS 20 2012-2013 BOARD OF DIRECTORS 20 2012-2013 FOUNDATION’S FINANCIAL STATEMENT 21 MAJOR CAMPAIGN FINANCIAL STATEMENT 21 A NEW HOSPITAL IN 2017. 2018 22-23 TO BETTER SERVE YOU... 25 4 A NEW In the forthcoming years, HGH will experience the most important development of its 100-year-old history. Starting in 2017-2018, the Glengarry and Prescott- CORPORATE Russell population served by HGH will have access to an expanded healthcare campus, which will include a new 100-bed regional hospital and a regional BRAND FOR A healthcare hub in Hawkesbury, as well as satellite services in Casselman NEW HOSPITAL and Rockland. To reflect this transformation, the hospital’s corporate brand has been redesigned and adapted. The initials (HGH) are now prominent, rather than the legal form previously used. The logo adopted in 2000 is kept as it reflects community spirit. The corporate colors are also retained. Blue is associated with life and well-being, and by extension to the health mission of the hospital.
    [Show full text]