DOCSLIB.ORG

2007 Summary (PDF)

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
2007 Summary (PDF) THE STATE CLIMATOLOGIST 2007 Annual Summary Volume 26, Issue 1 The State Climatologist is a publication of the American Association of State Climatologists Paul Knight, President, Pennsylvania State Climatologist Hope Mizzell, Secretary/Treasurer David Robinson, ARSCO Deborah Bathke & Melissa Griffin, South Carolina State Climatologist Coordinator Editors, The State Climatologist New Jersey State Climatologist New Mexico & Florida Climate Centers Marjorie McGuirk, Ex-Officio Robert Leffler, Ex-Officio Member Jan Curtis, Ex-Officio Member Member National Weather Service – Climate NRCS –National Water and Climate National Climatic Data Center Services Division Center Editor’s Note The State Climatologist is an annual report of the activities of the members of the American Association of State Climatologists. It has been a pleasure to be the editors of this year’s edition, spanning the period of January – December 2007. We would like to express appreciation to all of the state climate offices, regional climate centers, AASC partners and others who contributed to this year’s edition. Deborah Bathke New Mexico Climate Center New Mexico State University Melissa L. Griffin Florida Climate Center Florida State University July 7, 2008 1 Table of Contents About the American Association of State Climatologists.................................................4 ARSCO...........................................................................................................................4 Letter From The AASC President....................................................................................5 2007 SUMMARY OF THE UNITED STATES CLIMATE ............................................6 NOAA/National Weather Service Climate Services Division ........................................ 15 NOAA’s National Climatic Data Center (NCDC).......................................................... 18 Natural Resources Conservation Service ....................................................................... 19 Midwestern Regional Climate Center............................................................................ 21 Southeast Regional Climate Center ............................................................................... 24 Western Regional Climate Center ................................................................................. 25 Alabama Office of the State Climatologist (AOSC)....................................................... 27 Alaska Climate Research Center ................................................................................... 29 Office of the Arizona State Climatologist...................................................................... 31 Office of the California State Climatologist................................................................... 35 Colorado Climate Center............................................................................................... 37 Connecticut State Climate Center.................................................................................. 40 Office of the Delaware State Climatologist.................................................................... 41 Florida Climate Center.................................................................................................. 44 Georgia State Climatology Office ................................................................................. 46 Hawaii State Climate Office (HSCO)............................................................................ 47 Idaho State Climate Services......................................................................................... 48 Illinois State Water Survey............................................................................................ 50 Iowa State Climatologist Office .................................................................................... 52 Kentucky Climate Center .............................................................................................. 54 Louisiana Office of the State Climatologist ................................................................... 56 Maryland State Climatologist Office ............................................................................. 58 Minnesota State Climatology Office.............................................................................. 59 Office of the Mississippi State Climatologist................................................................. 61 Missouri Climate Center ............................................................................................... 65 Nevada State Climate Office ......................................................................................... 69 Office of the New Jersey State Climatologist ................................................................ 71 2 New Mexico Climate Center ......................................................................................... 74 State Climate Office of North Carolina.......................................................................... 76 North Dakota State Climate Office................................................................................ 78 Oklahoma Climatological Survey.................................................................................. 83 Oregon Climate Service ................................................................................................ 86 Pennsylvania State Climate Office ................................................................................ 88 South Carolina Office of Climatology ........................................................................... 90 South Dakota Office of Climate and Weather................................................................ 93 Office of the Texas State Climatologist ......................................................................... 96 Utah Climate Center...................................................................................................... 99 Vermont State Climate Office ..................................................................................... 102 University of Virginia Climatology Office .................................................................. 104 Office of Washington State Climatologist ................................................................... 107 Wisconsin State Climatology Office............................................................................ 109 Wyoming State Climate Office.................................................................................... 111 AASC 2007 Annual Meeting Minutes......................................................................... 113 3 About the American Association of State Climatologists The American Association of State Climatologists (AASC) is a professional scientific organization composed of state climatologists (one per state), directors of the six Regional Climate Centers and associate members who are persons interested in the goals and activities of the Association. State Climatologists are individuals who have been identified by a state entity as the state's climatologist and who are also recognized by the Director of the National Climatic Data Center of the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration as the state climatologist of a particular state. State Climatologists currently exist in 44 states and Puerto Rico. They are typically either employees of state agencies or are staff members of state-supported universities. Associate members may be assistant state climatologists or other climatologists under the employ of the state climatologist, representatives of federal climate agencies, retired state climatologists, or others interested in climate services. The total membership of the Association is approximately 150. For more info, see http://lwf.ncdc.noaa.gov/oa/climate/stateclimatologists.html. ARSCO A state climate office may gain status as the AASC-Recognized State Climate Office (ARSCO) by providing: 1. A document detailing current and planned activities meeting ARSCO requirements; 2. A letter of support from the state’s Regional Climate Center Director; 3. A letter of support from at least one National Weather Service Forecast Office serving the state. Candidate offices must demonstrate the following capabilities: • Communication capabilities – the office must be able to communicate with its clientele via multiple media, including telephone, Internet, mail, E- mail, and fax; • Information services – the office must be capable of providing a range of data and information; • Research – the office must conduct research on climate and human activities; • Outreach – the office should design products and services for education, climate information, awareness, and the media; • Monitoring and assessments – monitoring climate conditions, evaluating future impacts, and providing historical context to events are activities conducted by ARSCOs. Upon receipt of the materials and approval of the AASC Executive Board, a Memorandum of Agreement (MOA) with the National Climatic Data Center shall be issued. Currently, 37 states have received ARSCO status. 4 Letter From The AASC President Summer, 2008 Dear Fellow Climatologists, Partners and Friends of the AASC, It is my pleasure to present to you this annual report summarizing the work of both AASC Recognized State Climate Offices (ARSCO), Regional Climate Centers, fledgling State Climate Offices and our valuable federal partners. The summaries within represent quite a diverse group ranging from the nearly volunteer
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Phd Literature Review
    Measuring Media Coverage of Electricity Public Policy in New Zealand for the period 2006-2007 : A new approach Jeanette Susan Elley A thesis submitted to Auckland University of Technology in fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy (PhD) 2014 Institute of Public Policy Faculty of Culture and Society Primary Supervisor : Marilyn J. Waring Second Supervisor: L. Grant Duncan Contents Contents 2 List of Figures 5 List of Tables 10 List of Example Articles 11 Attestation of Authorship 12 Acknowledgements 13 Abstract 14 Chapter 1 – Introduction 16 1.1 Overview 16 1.2 Fields of Investigation 20 1.3 Chapter Guide 23 Chapter 2 – Literature Review 24 2.1 Introduction 24 2.2 Media Context 24 2.3 Political Economy and Electricity 53 2.4 Comparable Studies 83 2.5 Conclusion 100 Chapter 3 – Categorisation Framework 102 3.1 Introduction 102 3.2 Constructing the Categorisation Framework 103 3.3 Issues Affecting the Electricity Sector 119 3.4 Combined Influences on Electricity Sector Policy 126 3.5 Comparisons with Other Models 128 3.6 Conclusion 140 2 Chapter 4 – Research Design 142 4.1 Introduction 142 4.2 Methodology 144 4.3 Research Process 159 4.4 Categorisation 181 4.5 Key Indicators 213 4.6 Processing Features 227 4.7 Article Selection 256 4.8 Conclusion 272 Chapter 5 – Data 273 5.1 Overview 273 5.2 Topic Set Results 279 5.3 Case Study Results 309 5.4 Parameter Set Results 328 5.5 Conclusion 351 Chapter 6 – Discussion 355 6.1 Introduction 355 6.2 Addressing Thesis Questions 356 6.3 Case Study Analysis 363 6.4 Other
    [Show full text]
  • MASARYK UNIVERSITY BRNO Diploma Thesis
    MASARYK UNIVERSITY BRNO FACULTY OF EDUCATION Diploma thesis Brno 2018 Supervisor: Author: doc. Mgr. Martin Adam, Ph.D. Bc. Lukáš Opavský MASARYK UNIVERSITY BRNO FACULTY OF EDUCATION DEPARTMENT OF ENGLISH LANGUAGE AND LITERATURE Presentation Sentences in Wikipedia: FSP Analysis Diploma thesis Brno 2018 Supervisor: Author: doc. Mgr. Martin Adam, Ph.D. Bc. Lukáš Opavský Declaration I declare that I have worked on this thesis independently, using only the primary and secondary sources listed in the bibliography. I agree with the placing of this thesis in the library of the Faculty of Education at the Masaryk University and with the access for academic purposes. Brno, 30th March 2018 …………………………………………. Bc. Lukáš Opavský Acknowledgements I would like to thank my supervisor, doc. Mgr. Martin Adam, Ph.D. for his kind help and constant guidance throughout my work. Bc. Lukáš Opavský OPAVSKÝ, Lukáš. Presentation Sentences in Wikipedia: FSP Analysis; Diploma Thesis. Brno: Masaryk University, Faculty of Education, English Language and Literature Department, 2018. XX p. Supervisor: doc. Mgr. Martin Adam, Ph.D. Annotation The purpose of this thesis is an analysis of a corpus comprising of opening sentences of articles collected from the online encyclopaedia Wikipedia. Four different quality categories from Wikipedia were chosen, from the total amount of eight, to ensure gathering of a representative sample, for each category there are fifty sentences, the total amount of the sentences altogether is, therefore, two hundred. The sentences will be analysed according to the Firabsian theory of functional sentence perspective in order to discriminate differences both between the quality categories and also within the categories.
    [Show full text]
  • Capital Adequacy (E) Task Force RBC Proposal Form
    Capital Adequacy (E) Task Force RBC Proposal Form [ ] Capital Adequacy (E) Task Force [ x ] Health RBC (E) Working Group [ ] Life RBC (E) Working Group [ ] Catastrophe Risk (E) Subgroup [ ] Investment RBC (E) Working Group [ ] SMI RBC (E) Subgroup [ ] C3 Phase II/ AG43 (E/A) Subgroup [ ] P/C RBC (E) Working Group [ ] Stress Testing (E) Subgroup DATE: 08/31/2020 FOR NAIC USE ONLY CONTACT PERSON: Crystal Brown Agenda Item # 2020-07-H TELEPHONE: 816-783-8146 Year 2021 EMAIL ADDRESS: [email protected] DISPOSITION [ x ] ADOPTED WG 10/29/20 & TF 11/19/20 ON BEHALF OF: Health RBC (E) Working Group [ ] REJECTED NAME: Steve Drutz [ ] DEFERRED TO TITLE: Chief Financial Analyst/Chair [ ] REFERRED TO OTHER NAIC GROUP AFFILIATION: WA Office of Insurance Commissioner [ ] EXPOSED ________________ ADDRESS: 5000 Capitol Blvd SE [ ] OTHER (SPECIFY) Tumwater, WA 98501 IDENTIFICATION OF SOURCE AND FORM(S)/INSTRUCTIONS TO BE CHANGED [ x ] Health RBC Blanks [ x ] Health RBC Instructions [ ] Other ___________________ [ ] Life and Fraternal RBC Blanks [ ] Life and Fraternal RBC Instructions [ ] Property/Casualty RBC Blanks [ ] Property/Casualty RBC Instructions DESCRIPTION OF CHANGE(S) Split the Bonds and Misc. Fixed Income Assets into separate pages (Page XR007 and XR008). REASON OR JUSTIFICATION FOR CHANGE ** Currently the Bonds and Misc. Fixed Income Assets are included on page XR007 of the Health RBC formula. With the implementation of the 20 bond designations and the electronic only tables, the Bonds and Misc. Fixed Income Assets were split between two tabs in the excel file for use of the electronic only tables and ease of printing. However, for increased transparency and system requirements, it is suggested that these pages be split into separate page numbers beginning with year-2021.
    [Show full text]
  • Synergistic Effects of Land Cover, Rain and Fog Seasonality, and Interannual Precipitation Variability
    Global Change Biology (2009), doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2486.2009.01985.x Water inputs across a tropical montane landscape in Veracruz, Mexico: synergistic effects of land cover, rain and fog seasonality, and interannual precipitation variability ALEXANDRA G. PONETTE-GONZA´ LEZ*, KATHLEEN C. WEATHERSw and LISA M. CURRANz *Yale School of Forestry & Environmental Studies, 195 Prospect Street, New Haven, CT 06511, USA, wCary Institute of Ecosystem Studies, PO Box AB, Millbrook, NY 12545, USA, zStanford University, 450 Serra Mall Bldg 50, Stanford, CA 94305, USA Abstract Land-cover change can alter the spatiotemporal distribution of water inputs to mountain ecosystems, an important control on land-surface and land-atmosphere hydrologic fluxes. In eastern Mexico, we examined the influence of three widespread land-cover types, montane cloud forest, coffee agroforestry, and cleared areas, on total and net water inputs to soil. Stand structural characteristics, as well as rain, fog, stemflow, and throughfall (water that falls through the canopy) water fluxes were measured across 11 sites during wet and dry seasons from 2005 to 2008. Land-cover type had a significant effect on annual and seasonal net throughfall (NTF o0 5 canopy water retention plus canopy evapora- tion; NTF 40 5 fog water deposition). Forest canopies retained and/or lost to evaporation (i.e. NTFo0) five- to 11-fold more water than coffee agroforests. Moreover, stemflow was fourfold higher under coffee shade than forest trees. Precipitation seasonality and phenological patterns determined the magnitude of these land-cover differences, as well as their implications for the hydrologic cycle. Significant negative relationships were found between NTF and tree leaf area index (R2 5 0.38, Po0.002), NTF and stand basal area (R2 5 0.664, Po0.002), and stemflow and epiphyte loading (R2 5 0.414, Po0.001).
    [Show full text]
  • Chubb Are You Disaster Ready? White Paper 7.09.20
    Are You Disaster-Ready? What You Need to Know Before Hurricane Season Introduction In 2019, Chubb published a White Paper entitled “Staying Ahead of the Storm: Preparing for Upcoming Hurricane Seasons,” which noted that major hurricanes during the two previous years, 2017 and 2018, caused storm-related damage totaling hundreds of billions of dollars, while at the same time outlining the lessons learned for mitigating hurricane losses in the future. The 2019 hurricane season was not nearly as costly as the previous two. However, hurricanes in 2019 did cause above-average property damage for the fourth year in a row1, highlighting the critical importance of applying risk management lessons learned from year to year. 1 Are You Disaster-Ready? What You Need to Know Before Hurricane Season The 2019 Storm Season At the same time, Hurricane Barry pummeled Louisiana as a Category 1 Impact of the The 2019 hurricane season was also the storm, dropping heavy rainfall in that 2019 Storm Season fourth most active on record for named state as well as Arkansas, and costing Atlantic storms. Producing 18 named $600 million.3 storms and 20 cyclones, the damage left behind totaled $11.6 billion.2 Hurricanes in 2019 caused above- During 2019, two hurricanes reached average property damage for the Category 5 status: Hurricane Dorian fourth year in a row, highlighting the critical importance of applying risk • Hurricane Dorian hit the Virgin Islands, Bahamas, and Eastern seaboard, leaving behind management lessons learned from $4.68 Billion $4.68 billion worth of estimated damage, year to year. • Hurricane Lorenzo and Hurricane Lorenzo, formed of the western coast of Africa, made its Since tropical storms and hurricanes $362 Million way north to the United Kingdom and deliver overpowering wind, rain, and Ireland, damaging the Azores along the • Tropical Storm Imelda fooding that can cause structural and way, causing estimated damages around environmental devastation, strategies $5 Billion $362 million.
    [Show full text]
  • Fall/Winter 2007
    St rm Signals Houston/Galveston National Weather Service Office Volume 76 Fall/Winter 2007 Houston/Galveston Meteorologist In Charge - Bill Read Detailed to National Hurricane Center In August, I was given the unique opportunity to serve as Acting Deputy Director of the Tropical Prediction Center/National Hurricane Center (NHC) for an as yet to be determined period of time beginning Labor Day. This came about when the Director position became vacant and Dr. Ed Rappaport, the current Deputy Director, was elevated to Acting Director until such a time as the vacancy can be filled through the competitive process. My duties are to administer some ten actions that arose from the report of a Management Assessment Team which looked at the operation during late June and early July. Operationally, I will oversee the activities of the Hurricane Liaison Team (HLT). Gene Hafele and I have served as meteorologists on the HLT a number of times over the recent past, hence this was a natural task for me to take on. As of this writing (September 17th), I have been on the job only two weeks, but a lot of interesting events have happened. Operationally, NHC covers all systems in the Atlantic and Eastern Pacific, so almost every day this time of year there is either a storm or suspect area requiring our attention. In addition to the well known tropical cyclone warning process, another branch, known as the Tropical Analysis and Forecast Branch, works 24/7 producing forecasts and analyses of the tropical Atlantic and eastern Pacific oceans. Detailed analysis maps are produced and sent to the marine community, as are high seas and offshore wind and seas forecasts, similar to the coastal waters forecast we produce at the local forecast office.
    [Show full text]
  • Are Cyclones with Tropical Origin a Risk for Portugal?
    UNIVERSIDADE DE LISBOA FACULDADE DE CIÊNCIAS DEPARTAMENTO DE ENGENHARIA GEOGRÁFICA, GEOFÍSICA E ENERGIA Are Cyclones with Tropical Origin A Risk for Portugal? Tiago Saraiva Marques Ferreira Mestrado em Ciências Geofísicas Especialização em Meteorologia e Oceanografia Dissertação orientada por: Doutor Alexandre Miguel Ramos Doutor João Paulo Afonso Martins 2020 ACKNOWLEDGMENTS In addition to thanking my official advisors, Alexandre Ramos and João Paulo Martins, a big thank you also to Pedro Sousa, who even though not officially acknowledged as advisor, was present in all discussions and supported the guidance of this work. This thesis was done in the framework of the project Weather Extremes in the Euro Atlantic Region: Assessment and Impacts (WEx-Atlantic, PTDC/CTA-MET/29233/2017) funded by Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia, Portugal (FCT). i ABSTRACT Tropical Cyclones are weather systems well-known for causing considerable damage to both human life and property. As global climate change continues to be an area of concern and significant scientific inquiry, there are many questions on how tropical cyclones frequencies and intensities may be affected by a warming climate. In the North Atlantic, most systems originate and remain near the Caribbean Sea, the Gulf of Mexico and even along the east coast of North America. Only a few actually reach the western and northwestern Europe. Recent research suggests that climate warming causes a poleward and eastward extension of the tropical cyclone genesis area, but it is still uncertain whether these changes, along with the increase of sea surface temperature, are large enough to allow tropical cyclones to reach Europe.
    [Show full text]
  • Tropical Cyclone Report Hurricane Lorenzo (AL132007) 25-28 September 2007
    Tropical Cyclone Report Hurricane Lorenzo (AL132007) 25-28 September 2007 James L. Franklin National Hurricane Center 18 October 2007 Hurricane Lorenzo was a category 1 hurricane (on the Saffir-Simpson Hurricane Scale) that made landfall in Mexico south of Tuxpan - in virtually the same location that Hurricane Dean had struck a month earlier. a. Synoptic History Lorenzo formed from a tropical wave that moved across the west coast of Africa around 11 September. Convection associated with the wave increased in the western Caribbean on 21 September, and the northern portion of the wave crossed the Yucatan Peninsula and entered the southern Gulf of Mexico. On 24 September, the wave spawned a small surface low in the southwestern Gulf of Mexico, and convection with the system increased. Strong upper-level winds initially inhibited development, but the upper flow began to relax the following day and a tropical depression formed around 1800 UTC 25 September, when the system was centered about 150 n mi east-northeast of Tuxpan, Mexico. The “best track” chart of the tropical cyclone’s path is given in Fig. 1, with the wind and pressure histories shown in Figs. 2 and 3, respectively. The best track positions and intensities are listed in Table 1. Steering currents surrounding the cyclone were weak initially, and the depression made a small cyclonic loop over the next 30 hours or so. There was little development during this period, due to upper-level southwesterlies associated with a trough near the Texas coast. As the trough moved westward, however, the southwesterly upper flow gave way to an anticyclone above the depression, and the system became a tropical storm at 1200 UTC 27 September, when it was about 130 n mi east of Tuxpan.
    [Show full text]
  • Arxiv:2003.14291V1 [Cs.SI] 31 Mar 2020
    Hurricanes and hashtags: Characterizing online collective attention for natural disasters Michael V. Arnold,1, ∗ David Rushing Dewhurst,1, 2 Thayer Alshaabi,1 Joshua R. Minot,1 Jane L. Adams,1 Christopher M. Danforth,1 and Peter Sheridan Dodds1 1MassMutual Center of Excellence in Complex Systems and Data Science, Computational Story Lab, Vermont Complex Systems Center, and the Department of Mathematics and Statistics, University of Vermont, Burlington, Vermont 05405, USA 2MassMutual Data Science, Boston, Massachusetts 02110, USA (Dated: April 1, 2020) We study collective attention paid towards hurricanes through the lens of n-grams on Twitter, a social media platform with global reach. Using hurricane name mentions as a proxy for aware- ness, we find that the exogenous temporal dynamics are remarkably similar across storms, but that overall collective attention varies widely even among storms causing comparable deaths and dam- age. We construct `hurricane attention maps' and observe that hurricanes causing deaths on (or economic damage to) the continental United States generate substantially more attention in English language tweets than those that do not. We find that a hurricanes Saffir-Simpson wind scale cat- egory assignment is strongly associated with the amount of attention it receives. Higher category storms receive higher proportional increases of attention per proportional increases in number of deaths or dollars of damage, than lower category storms. The most damaging and deadly storms of the 2010s, Hurricanes Harvey and Maria, generated the most attention and were remembered the longest, respectively. On average, a category 5 storm receives 4.6 times more attention than a category 1 storm causing the same number of deaths and economic damage.
    [Show full text]
  • Forecast of Atlantic Hurricane Activity For
    SUMMARY OF 2007 ATLANTIC TROPICAL CYCLONE ACTIVITY AND VERIFICATION OF AUTHOR’S SEASONAL AND MONTHLY FORECASTS The 2007 Atlantic basin hurricane season had activity at near-average levels. This activity was less than predicted in our seasonal forecasts. By Philip J. Klotzbach1 and William M. Gray2 with special assistance from William Thorson3 This forecast as well as past forecasts and verifications are available via the World Wide Web at http://hurricane.atmos.colostate.edu/Forecasts Emily Wilmsen, Colorado State University Media Representative, (970-491-6432) is available to answer various questions about this verification. Department of Atmospheric Science Colorado State University Fort Collins, CO 80523 Email: [email protected] 27 November 2007 1 Research Scientist 2 Professor of Atmospheric Science 3 Research Associate 1 ATLANTIC BASIN SEASONAL HURRICANE FORECASTS FOR 2007 Forecast Parameter and 1950- Update Update Update Update Update Observed 2000 Climatology (in 8 Dec 3 April 31 May 3 Aug 4 Sep 2 Oct 2007 parentheses) 2006 2007 2007 2007 2007 2007 Total Named Storms (NS) (9.6) 14 17 17 15 15 17 14 Named Storm Days (NSD) 70 85 85 75 71.75 53 33.50 (49.1) Hurricanes (H) (5.9) 7 9 9 8 7 7 6 Hurricane Days (HD) (24.5) 35 40 40 35 35.50 20 11.25 Intense Hurricanes (IH) (2.3) 3 5 5 4 4 3 2 Intense Hurricane Days (IHD) 8 11 11 10 12.25 8 5.75 (5.0) Accumulated Cyclone Energy 130 170 170 150 148 100 68 (ACE) (96.2) Net Tropical Cyclone Activity 140 185 185 160 162 127 94 (NTC) (100%) Figure courtesy of Weather Underground (http://www.weatherunderground.com) 2 ABSTRACT This report summarizes tropical cyclone (TC) activity, which occurred in the Atlantic basin during 2007 and verifies the authors’ seasonal and monthly forecasts of this activity.
    [Show full text]
  • Factors Affecting the 2019 Atlantic Hurricane Season and the Role of the Indian Ocean Dipole
    Wood Kimberly, M. (Orcid ID: 0000-0002-1436-5137) Klotzbach Philip (Orcid ID: 0000-0001-5372-6241) Collins Jennifer, M (Orcid ID: 0000-0001-6780-8280) Caron Louis-Philippe (Orcid ID: 0000-0001-5221-0147) Truchelut Ryan, Eugene (Orcid ID: 0000-0002-7251-695X) Factors affecting the 2019 Atlantic hurricane season and the role of the Indian Ocean Dipole Kimberly M. Wood1, Philip J. Klotzbach2, Jennifer M. Collins3, Louis-Philippe Caron4, Ryan E. Truchelut5, Carl J. Schreck6 1Department of Geosciences, Mississippi State University, Mississippi State, MS, USA 2Department of Atmospheric Science, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, CO, USA 3School of Geosciences, University of South Florida, Tampa, FL, USA 4Barcelona Supercomputing Center, Barcelona, Spain 5WeatherTiger, Tallahassee, FL, USA 6North Carolina State University (NCSU), Cooperative Institute for Satellite Earth System Studies (CISESS), Asheville, NC, USA Corresponding author: Kimberly M. Wood ([email protected]) Key Points: Most 2019 Atlantic tropical cyclone activity occurred during a 6-week period of conducive environmental conditions. The subtropical Atlantic was more favorable than normal for tropical cyclones. The strongly positive Indian Ocean Dipole likely contributed to below-normal Atlantic tropical cyclone activity in October. This article has been accepted for publication and undergone full peer review but has not been through the copyediting, typesetting, pagination and proofreading process which may lead to differences between this version and the Version of Record. Please cite this article as doi: 10.1029/2020GL087781 ©2020 American Geophysical Union. All rights reserved. Abstract The 2019 Atlantic hurricane season exhibited above-average Accumulated Cyclone Energy— 60% of which was produced by Hurricanes Dorian and Lorenzo.
    [Show full text]
  • Facts + Statistics: Hurricanes Hurricanes
    Facts + Statistics: Hurricanes Catastrophes IN THIS FACTS + STATISTICS 2021 Hurricane Season 2020 Hurricane Season 2019 and 2018 Hurricane Seasons Earlier Hurricane Seasons Costliest U.S. Hurricanes Top 10 Costliest Hurricanes In The United States (1) Estimated Insured Losses For The Top 10 Historical Hurricanes Based On Current Exposures (1) Hurricanes And Related Deaths In The United States, 2000-2020 Storm Surge Risk By State By Number Of Single-Family Homes and Reconstruction Value, 2020 (1) Top 10 States, By Population Change In Coastal Counties, 1960-2010 Top Coastal Counties Most Frequently Hit By Hurricanes: 1960-2008 Top 10 Most Significant Flood Events By National Flood Insurance Program Payouts (1) SHARE THIS DOWNLOAD TO PDF The official Atlantic hurricane season runs from June through November, but occasionally storms form outside those months. September is the most common month for hurricanes making landfall in the U.S., followed by August and October, according to an analysis of 1851 to 2015 data by the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration. No hurricanes made U.S. landfall before June and after November during the period studied. A tropical cyclone is a rotating low-pressure weather system that has organized thunderstorms but no fronts, according to the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration. Hurricanes are tropical cyclones which have sustained winds of 74 mph. At this point a hurricane reaches Category 1 on the Saffir-Simpson Hurricane Wind Scale, which has a range of 1 to 5, based on the hurricane's intensity at the time of landfall at the location experiencing the strongest winds. The scale provides examples of the type of damage and impacts in the United States associated with winds of the indicated intensity.
    [Show full text]